Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInitial Plan IPZR2004021 - Supporting DocumentsI --- --- C-lq 937 Index Article 937 NORTH HUNTINGTON CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (2026-12/75, 2730-10/84, 2731-10/84, 2773-6/85, 2791-10/85, 3057-11/90, 3110-7/91) Sections: 9370 Definitions 9371 Establishment of Specific Plan 9371.1 General Location 9371.2 Legal Description 9371.3 Administration of Plan 9371.4 Minor Modifications 9371.5 Use Limitations and Location Requirements 9371.6 General Provision Building Height 9371.7 General Provision Pedestrian Walkway System 9371.8 General Provisions. Perimeter Setbacks 9371.9 General Provisions. Sign Regulations 9371.10 General Provisions. Transit Facilities 9371.11 General Provisions. Parking and Loading Requirements 9371.12 General Provisions. Landscaping and Screening Requirements 9371.13 General Provisions. Setback Landscaping 9371.14 General Provisions. Undeveloped Areas 9371.15 General Provisions. Parking Area Landscaping 9371.16 General Provisions. Sloped Banks 9371.17 General Provisions. Refuse Collection Areas 9371.18 General Provisions. Telephone and Electrical Service 9371.19 General Provisions. Sewage and Water Systems. Fire Prevention 9371.20 Site Regulations 9372 Site I Regulations. Permitted Uses 9372.1 Site I Regulations. Maximum Density 9372.2 Site I Regulations. Minimum Dwelling Unit Size 9372.3 Site I Regulations. Building Coverage 9372.4 Site I Regulations. Setback From Street 9372.5 Site I Regulations. Setback From Interior Property Line 9372.6 Site-I Regulations. Minimum Distance Between Buildings 9372.7 Site I Regulations. Private Driveways 9372.8 Site I Regulations. Parking Facilities 9372.9 Site I Regulations. Parking Assignments 9372.10 Site I Regulations. Recreation Areas 9372.11 Site I Regulations. Landscaping 9372.12 Site I Regulations. Trash Pickup Areas 9372.13 Site I Regulations. Storage Space 9372.14 Site I Regulations. Appearance Standards 9373 Site II Regulations. Uses Permitted 9373.1 Site II Regulations. Additional Permitted Uses 9373.2 Site II Regulations. Setbacks 9373.3 Site II Regulations. Residential Use 9374 Site III Regulations. Uses Permitted 7/91 9370--9371.1 370 Definitions. Whenever the following terms are used in this article they shall have the meaning specified below unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary. (a) "Active Land Use" shall mean that physical area of property within the specific plan which is utilized by building coverage, parking, storage, recreation area and pedestrian circulation purposes. (b) "Director" shall mean Director of Planning and Environmental Resources. (c) "General Plan" shall mean the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. (d) "Minor Modification" shall mean where unforeseen engineering or design problems are encountered in construction of the project in accordance with the approvals previously granted by the City, the Director may approve minor deviations. (e) "Perimeter wall" shall mean any opaque screen which is located on or within five (5) feet of a property line designed to screen the buildings, yards, or activities from adjacent property or right-of-way. (f) "Site" shall mean a physical boundary delineated upon the Specific Plan Map which correlates with site development regulations contained in this article. (g) "Specific Plan" shall mean the North Huntington Center Specific Plan as adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. (h) "Specific Plan Map" shall mean the map described in Section 9375 which delineates the physical boundaries of the specific plan in addition to other regulatory provisions cited herein. 371 Establishment of S ecific Plan. There is hereby established the North Huntington Center Specific Plan. Property included within this plan shall be developed in accordance with the provisions contained in this article and all applicable provisions of Division 9 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 71.1 eneral Location. The general location of the North Huntington Center Specific Plan is that area bounded by McFadden Avenue to the north, San Diego Freeway to the east, Center Drive to the south and the Southern Pacific Railroad to the west. 7/91 9371.1--9371.6 I clrf otirf6 777 3 R/w d a J V 71.2 1 D ri i n. That portion of the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Boisa Chica, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, lying Southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the Westerly line of said Southeast quarter, said point being South 0' 16' 13" West 30.05 feet from the Northwest corner of said Southeast quarter, said point also being the point of intersection of a line that is parallel with and distant Southerly 30.00 L r 7/91 9371.1--9371.5(a) feet, measured at right angles, from the Northerly line of said Southeast qu§rter with said Westerly line of the Southeast quarter; thence South 89 43' 57" East at right angles to said Westerly line of the Southeast quarter 15.00 feet to a point in a non-tangent curve concave Southwesterly having a radius of 35.00 feet,4 radius of 35.00 feet, a radial line through said point bears North 16 27' 37" West; thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 98 17' 40" an arc distance of 60.04 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 120.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 57 31' 24" an arc distance of 120.48 feet; thence South 650 41' 21" East tangent to said last mentioned curve 581.07 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said West half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 14. Excepting therefrom the Southerly 30.00 feet. Also excepting therefrom that portion included within the right-of-way of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company. And those portions of the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, S. B. M., and the South half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 14, bounded Westerly by the Westerly line of said East half, bounded Southerly by the Southerly lines of said East half and said South half; bounded Northerly by the Southerly boundary of the San Diego Freeway and the Southerly boundary of Parcel 1 of State Highway Relinquishment recorded in book 8649, page 882 of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said County. 71. Admini tration of Plan. Proposed development under the concepts of) this specific plan shall be subject to approval of a conditional use permit7 pursuant to Article 984 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Said 1- conditional use permit shall encompass the entire specific plan area./ 71.4 Minor Modifi ation . Where a minor modification to an approved conditional use permit is proposed, a written request shall be submitted to the Director. Said request.shall comply with all requirements of this article and the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The request shall specify the exact modifications described and reasons therefor. In reviewing such a request, the Director shall not approve the minor modification if he finds that said amendment substantially alters the plot plans, which were relied upon in approval of a conditional use permit for a proposed development. If there is a substantial alteration to said plans, a conditional use permit modification shall be required. 9371.5 U e Limitations and Location Re uirement . The following _ regulations shall govern the proportion of land use activity and locational requirements of the Specific Plan: (a) Residential Us Limitations: Except as provided in Section 9373.1, residential development within the boundaries of the specific plan shall not encompass an area in excess of 8.5 gross acres and shall comply with Section 9372 (Site I Regulations) of this article. 7/91 9371.5(b)--9371.12 (b) Locational Criteria: Proposed uses shall be located in the specific plan area in accordance with the Site Regulations contained in this article. 9371.6 General Provision B it in Hei ht. Building height within the specific plan area shall not exceed the limitations for each site as delineated upon the specific plan map. Exceptions: Height limitations as specified for each district shall not be deemed to regulate the height of chimneys, flagpoles, scenery lofts, ornamental towers, spires, domes, cupolas, parapet walls not exceeding four (4) feet in height, rooftop mechanical equipment, or other similar appurtenances not designed for habitation. 371.7 eneral Provisions. Ped strian Walkwa S stem. A continuous pedestrian walkway system shall be provided in the specific plan area as delineated on the specific plan map. 9371.8 Gener 1 Provisions. Perimeter Setbacks. All structures greater than forty-two (42) inches in height shall set back from the exterior boundaries of the specific plan in accordance with the designations of the specific plan map. Exceptions. Perimeter setbacks are not applicable to Section 9371.10 or to perimeter walls. _ 371. eneral Provisi ns. Si n Re ula i ns. All signs shall conform to Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, however, freestandi_ng._____ signs shall be limited in the number permitted as designated on the specific plan map.7 No other freestanding signs shall be permitted. 9371.10 General Provisions. Transit Facilities. There shall be a transportation transfer facility provided adjacent to Center Drive for the purpose of accommodating mass transit vehicles. Said facility may include a canopy shelter for the convenience and comfort of persons utilizing the facility which shall not be subject to setback requirements of this article. The location of the facility shall generally conform to the location designated upon the specific plan map. 371.11 General Provisions. Parkin and Loadin Re uirement . jUpon submittal of an applicationfor a conditional use hermit; the-amount ofjr parking to accommodate the needs of the proposed land uses shall be providecP based upon a combination of the following methods: 0 057-7/91)--- J Peak hour demand analysis: (b) Joint use of parking based upon divergent needs; C (c) Ratios of parking in relation to building square footage; (2078-8/76) Except as provided in Section 9372.8, all developments shall comply. with standards outlined in Article 960. (3057-7/91) - 37112--General Provisions . Landsca 'n and_S-cr_eenin Re u-i_ nts. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans, prepared by a licensed architect or under the direction of a landscape architect, shal__1_be submitted to anJ 7/91 9371.12--9371.19(b) (sub-id-c- to approval by the Director prior to issuance of a building__permi,t and nstall -ed-pr -i-or-to -final -i-nspection.Lan dscape -ir the public right-of-way shall be installed in accordance with plans and specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. All unpaved areas not utilized for active land use shall be landscaped. 9371.13 General Pr visions. e back Landsca in . Except as provided in Section 9371.8, the entire area of perimeter setbacks shall be landscaped except for driveway openings and street intersections in said area. 371.14 General Provisions. Und veto ed Areas. Undeveloped areas proposed for future expansion shall be maintained in a weed and dust-free condition and shall remain free of debris. 371.15 eneral Provi ns_. ar Area Landsca in . Trees, equal in-?___ number to one (1) per each five (5) parking stalls shall be provided in the parking area. Trees within planting areas around buildings shall not be 2 included in calculating the number of trees required for parking areas. Planting of trees may be in groups and need not necessarily be in regular spacing. Screening of parking areas shall comply with Article 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 9371.16 eneral Provisions. Slo ed Banks. All sloped banks adjacent to a public right-of-way shall be stabilized, planted and irrigated with full coverage in accordance with plans submitted to and subject to approval by the Director of Public Works. 9371.17 General Provisions. Refuse Collection Areas: (a) /Opaque materials shall be used to screen outdoor refuse containers from view from access streets, freeways and adjacent property. (b) No refuse container area shall be permitted between a frontage street and the building line. (c) Minimum width for landscaping shall-be three (3) feet around refuse container areas except for access areas to said facility. 9371.18 General Provisions. Tele h n and Electrical Service. All "on-site" electrical lines (excluding lines in excess of 12KV) and telephone lines shall be placed underground. Transformer or terminal equipment shall be visually screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. 9 71.1 eneral Provision . Sewa e and Water S stems. Fire Prevention. (a) All sewage systems shall comply with standard plans and specifications of the City and shall connect to the City sewage system. (b) All water systems shall comply with standard plans and specifications of the City and shall connect to the City water system. 7/91 9371.19(c)--9372.6 (c) All fire protection appliances, appurtenances, emergency access and any other applicable requirements pursuant to Chapter 17.56 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, shall meet the standard plans and specifications on file with the Fire Department. 371.20 ite R ula i n . This specific plan is divided into site areas for purposes of development. Development of each site shall comply with the specific provisions contained herein, in addition to the general provisions of Section 9371. 9372 Site I Re ulations. Permitted Uses. (1) Residential, or (2) Commercial, subject to the same regulations applicable to Site III. 372.1 Site I Re ula ion . Maximum Den i . Residential density within Site I shall not exceed 34.85 dwelling units per gross acre. 372.2 Site I Re ula ions. Minimum Dwellin Unit Size. Unit Type Bachelor and Single One Bedroom Two Bedroom Three Bedroom Four Bedroom Minimum Floor Area 400 square feet 600 square feet 900 square feet 1100 square feet 1300 square feet 372. Site I Re ulations. Buildin Covera e. The maximum building coverage of all roofed structures shall not exceed forty-five percent (45%) of the gross acreage minus streets and drives. 372.4 Site I Re ulations. Setback From S r et. The setback from a street shall average twenty (20) feet from any structure exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height. In no case shall the minimum setback be less than fifteen (15) feet. Any exception to these requirements shall be designated on the specific plan map. 0 9372.5 Site I Re ulations. Setback From Interior Pro ert Line. The setback from interior property lines shall be not less than ten (10) feet except where a perimeter setback is designated in Section 9375 in which case the perimeter setback shall prevail as the minimum setback. Any exceptions to these requirements shall be designated on the specific.pl an 9372.6 Site I Re ulations. Minimum Distance Between Buildin s. The minimum distance between buildings thirty (30) feet or less in height shall be not less than fifteen (15) feet. The minimum distance between buildings greater than thirty (30) feet in height shall be not less than twenty (20) feet. Any e:,:eptions to these requirements shall be designated on the specific plan map. 7;' )1 9372.7--9372.9 9372.7 Site I Re ulations. Private Drivewa s. In order to provide sufficient driveway widths for traffic flow and maneuverability, the following standards shall apply: (a) Where a driveway serves as the primary access to or within an apartment development and vehicles can park parallel on both sides of such driveway, the minimum paved width shall be forty (40) feet.' (b) Where vehicles can parallel park on only one side of a driveway, which serves as the primary access to or within an apartment development, and where open or enclosed parking, other than parallel, is provided on the opposite side of such driveway, the minimum paved width shall be thirty-three (33) feet. (c) A minimum paved width of twenty-eight (28) feet shall be provided where open or enclosed parking, other than parallel, is provided on both sides of a driveway, which exceeds 150 feet in length and serves as the primary access to or within an apartment development. (d) Any driveway exceeding 150 feet in length which terminates within an apartment development shall be provided with a curbed turnaround having a twenty (20) foot radius. NOTE: The air space above all minimum widths for driveways within an apartment development shall remain open to the sky except for roof overhang or eaves above a height of fourteen (14) feet which may project, into such air space a maximum of four (4) feet. The developer is encouraged to provide covered parking spaces under main buildings to increase open space. 372.8 Site I Re ulations. Parkin Facilities. (3057-11/90) (a) Fully-enclosed garages shall be provided for any required covered parking spaces that are entered directly from any public alley. Physical separation such as drywall, masonry or similar material shall be provided between each enclosed parking space. (3057-11/90) (b) Carports may be used to satisfy the remaining covered parking requirement. (3057-11/90) -- (c) Carports and open parking compounds shall be screened from adjacent__ property lines, and such screening shall be compatible with the project- surroundings. (3057-11/90) (d) No carport and garage facility shall be permitted to face any public- street. (2078-8/76, 3057-11/90) 9372. ite I Re lati ns. Parkin Assi nments. Each dwelling unit shall - have an assigned, covered, parking space within two hundred (200) feet walking distance of such dwelling unit. - --- If off-street parking facilities are detached from the unit, each unit shall be assign a parking space and such space shall be so designated on a plot plan. 7/91 9372.10--9372.14(a) 72.1 i I Re ul tions. Re r ation Areas. Recreation areas shall be provided for each dwelling unit. Said recreation areas shall be allocated as follows: Unit Type Recreation Area Bachelor and Single 150 square feet One bedroom 200 square feet Two bedroom 325 square feet Three or more bedrooms 400 square feet I Enclosed recreation areas may be utilized to fulfill not more than fifteen percent (15%) of this requirement. The remaining area shall be supplied out-of-doors pursuant to this section. Recreation areas may include: game courts or rooms, swimming pools, sauna baths, putting greens, play lots, or other similar type areas serving all residents of the development; but shall not include balconies, decks or areas used exclusively for pedestrian access ways. Game courts, swimming pools or putting greens situated on top of a parking structure may be considered as recreation area. Recreation areas shall not be located within ten (10) feet of the wall of any ground floor unit having a door or window or within five (5) feet of any other wall. Also, such recreation area shall have a minimum width of twenty (20) feet. 372.11 Site I Re ulation . Landsca in . All setback areas fronting on or visible from a public street, and all recreation areas shall be landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner. Such landscaping shall primarily consist of ground cover, ferns, trees, shrubs, or other living plants. Decorative design elements such as fountains, pools, benches, sculpture, plants and similar elements may be permitted, provided such elements are incorporated as an integral part of the landscaping plan. 372.12 i e I Re ulations: Tr h Picku Ar s. Trash collection areas shall be provided within two hundred (200) feet of the unit they are intended to serve. - -- - 372.13 Site I Re ulations. Stora e S ac . A minimum of one hundred (100) cubic feet of storage space shall be provided for each unit. Special attention shall be given to the amount and location of such storage space. 9372.14 Site I Re ulations. A earance Standards. In order to retain and strengthen the unity and order of the surroundings, and to insure that the structures enhance their sites and are harmonious with the highest standards of improvements in the surrounding area and the community, the following standards shall apply. (a)- Architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development shall not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the occupancy thereof, or the community as a whole. 7/91 9372.14--9373.1(e) (b) Buildings exceeding 120 feet in length shall have variations in the wall setback of at least four (4) feet for each 120 feet of building length. (c) Architectural features shall be incorporated into the design of all vertical exterior surfaces of the buildings in order to create an aesthetically-pleasing project when viewed from outside the project as well as within. 373 Site II Re ulations. Uses Permitted. (a) Retail stores. (b) Restaurants, nightclubs, coffeehouses, snack bars and other related facilities. (c) Services such as barber shops, beauty shops, shoe repair. (d) Art galleries, art studios, art shops, antique shops, bookstores, photography studios and shops, gift shops, newspaper and magazine shops, import shops, interior design studios. (e) Chapel. (f) Travel agencies. (g) Motel (Not to exceed twelve (12) units). (h) Banks. (i) Handicraft shops, leathercraft shops, hobby-related shops. (j) Fortunetelling subject to issuance of a conditional use permit. (2773-7/85) 937 .1 it II Re ulations. Additional P rmitted ses. The following uses are permitted provided they are located above or behind a permitted use designated elsewhere: in this: article. (a) Single-family dwelling units. (b) Art, drama, music, dancing or language schools. (c) Any other use which the Planning Commission may find to be similar in character consistent with the uses permitted on Site II. (d) Adult dancing and/or live entertainment as a primary or secondary use subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit, and the requirements set-out_in.Section 9730.83 of.this-code. (2730-10/84, 2791-10/85)-- (e) Teen dancing for patrons under the age of twenty-one (21) subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit and the requirements contained in Section 9730.82. (2730-10/84, 2791-10/85)---- - - 7/91 9373.2--9374(m) 7 .2 1 II Re ul i n . t a k . Except where rim r k govern the following minimum yard setbacks measured from the' boundaries of Site II as delineated in Section 9375 shall apply: Front and exterior side: Twenty (20) feet Interior side and rear: Fifteen (15) feet Exceptions: Setbacks are not applicable to perimeter walls. 73.3 Si e II Re ulation . Re id nti 1 Use. If residential dwelling units are proposed for construction in Site II, the number of single family dwelling units shall not exceed forty-five (45). Each dwelling unit shall be provided with a_recreation area containing not less than three hundred (300) square feet having a minimum dimension of fifteen (15) feet. Said recreation area shall be situated adjacent to each dwelling unit. 374 it III Re ulations. Use P rmitted. The following uses are permitted in Site III of the North Huntington Center Specific Plan: (2730-10/84, 2791-10/85, 3110-7/91) (a) Retail stores. (b) e-staurant-s--, s'dew lk cafes, nightclubs, coffeehouses, snack bars and -the.r-r_el aced facilities. (c) Services such as barber shops, beauty shops, shoe repair. (d) Art galleries, art studios, art shops, antique shops, book stores, photography studios and shops, gift shops, newspaper and magazine shops, import shops and interior design studios. (e) Travel agencies. (f) Banks. (g) Motion picture theaters, legitimate theaters. (h) Handicraft shops, leathercraft shops and hobby-related shops. (i) Hotels and motels. (j) Offices for professional services. (k) Art, drama, music, dancing or language schools. (1) Automobile parking facilities. (m) Any other use which the Planning Commission may find to be similar in character consistent with the uses permitted in Site II.- 7/91 9374(1)--9374(p (n) Adult dancing and/or live entertainment as a primary or secondary use subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit and the requirements contained in Section 9730.83 of this code. (2730-10/84, 2791-10/85) (o) Teen dancing for patrons under the age of twenty-one (21), subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit and the requirements contained in Section 9730.82. (2730-10/84,'2791-10/85) (p) Single room occupancy/living units pursuant to Section 9220.15. (3110-7/91) 7/91 alit 4Yafp...-------_.------------ --- L--r-----------.$oH/.9APAYI'N7 Sairza4ydSdNWakl, AvM,YtyM 1'Nd-mnnoa nndil"O nolr0ncf 19NId v-63J-5--IKi'2fJWiIOol :!II II /N(Lwn 1n411"•ldald)z *,aOw J1$'I3H :Usc)T 31Ks -1191\Y!rwl 9 91 4G, S 6F d::/ AccI 1 I • 11111. 0 9A E N G I N E E R S ENGINEERS & PLANNERSa TRAFFIC, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING 1580 Corporate Drive, Suite 122 ®Costa Mesa, California 92626 Phone: 714 641-1587 a Fax. 714 641-0139 May 24, 2004 Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY 7755 Center Avenue, Suite 845 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Philip M. Lmscott, P E (1924-2000) lack M. Greenspan, P E William A. Law, P E. (Ret ) Paul W. Wilkinson, P.E. John P Keating, P.E David S Shender, P.E John A Boarman, P E Clare M Look-Jaeger, P E Richard E Barretto, P E LLG Reference No. 2-042532-1 SUBJECT : PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED ONE PACIFIC PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Huntington Beach , California Dear Ms. Blanchart: As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Demand Analysis for the proposed One Pacific Plaza redevelopment project to be named "Beach Pointe". The proposed One Pacific Plaza redevelopment project includes a new 40,000 SF health club and "Plaza" feature within the existing site. The One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project site is bound by Center Avenue on the south, Huntington Village Drive on the west, and the 1-405 Freeway on the north and east in the City of Huntington Beach, California. Based on our understanding, a parking study is required by the City to determine the parking demand for the proposed redevelopment project. Exhibit 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the project and depicts the surrounding street system Table 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents the existing land use development summary for One Pacific Plaza. As presented in Table 1, the site includes three office towers, two medical office buildings, and two restaurant/nightclub buildings totaling 466,888 SF. The site currently has 1,790 parking spaces within a five-level parking structure and several surface lots. Exhibit 2, attached, presents the existing site plan for One Pacific Plaza. The existing hotel located adjacent to the One Pacific Plaza site is not a part of the parking demand analysis and has sufficient parking within the hotel property. Based on research, there is a current reciprocal parking agreement with the adjacent Old World development, which allows parking within the One Pacific Plaza development during non-peak times (night time and weekend). Based on discussions with One Pacific Plaza management services, the Old World development only utilizes the parking structure during Oktoberfest festivities. Pasadena - 626 796-2322 a San Diego - 619 299-3090 a Las Vegas - 702 451-1920 a Founded 1966 a An LG2WB Company • . . E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 2 Briefly, based on this parking demand analysis for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project, a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces will be provided to accommodate the parking demand for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project. I On that basis, this parking analysis evaluates the project development parking requirements based on the City of Huntington Beach zoning code, the methodology outlined in Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Shared Parking guidelines, and parking surveys conducted on site. Briefly, based on direct application of City of Huntington Beach parking codes to the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project, a total of 2,055 parking spaces would be required for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project. In addition, based on the results of our shared parking analysis, the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project is forecast to have a weekday and weekend peak parking demand of 1,855 parking spaces and 448 parking spaces, respectively. Also, based on parking surveys at the current One Pacific Plaza site combined with the shared parking methodology , the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project is forecast to have a weekday and weekend peak parking demand of 1,273 parking spaces and 436 parking spaces , respectively. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project consists of replacing the existing 8,660 square-foot (SF) restaurant/night club building, currently "Liquid Lounge", with a 40,000 SF health club and construction of a "Plaza" feature in the center area of the three existing office towers. Exhibit 3, attached, presents the proposed site plan for the portion of the site to be redeveloped, prepared by GAA Architects, Inc. As a result o e One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project, the new parking supply for the site will be 1,760 arking spaces without any modification to the existing parking structure to provide addition I spaces. Table 2, attached, presents the proposed land use development summary for the propose " Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project. As presented in Table 2, the proposed Redevelopment project includes a 40,000 SF health club in place of the existing 8,660 SF restaurant/nightclub building at 7887 Center Avenue resulting in a total development of 498,228 SF. I 1 I I • • E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 3 PARKING REQUIREMENT -DEMAND ANALYSIS This parking analysis for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project involves determining the expected parking needs , based on the size and type of proposed development components. In general, there are three methods that can be used to estimate the site's peak parking requirements. These methods include: 1. Application of City code requirements (which typically treat each use in the project as a "stand alone" use at maximum demand); and 2. Application of shared parking usage patterns by time-of-day (which recognizes that the parking demand for each land use component varies by time of day, day of week, and/or month of year); and 3. Application of parking survey information combined with the shared parking methodology , which combines actual parking demand data with reoccupancy of vacant uses and proposed uses based on city code and time of day profiles. The shared parking methodology is certainly applicable to a development such as the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project, as the individual land uses (i.e., restaurant, health club, and office uses) experience peak demands at different times of the day and the parking survey/shared parking combination is the most accurate parking requirement forecast. PARKING CODE REQUIREMENTS To determine the number of parking spaces required to support the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project, parking demand was first calculated using the City of Huntington Beach Zoning Code. As mentioned previously , City parking code requirements typically treat each individual use in the project as a "stand alone" use at maximum demand, as opposed to an integrated part of the entire project. As such, the City of Huntington Beach Zoning Code (Chapter231 .04; Off-Street Parking and Loading Spaces Required) specifies a parking ratio of 1 space per 250 SF of office use, I space per 100 SF of restaurant and outdoor dining use, I space per 175 SF of medical office use, and 1 space per 200 SF of health club use. Table 3, attached, summarizes the parking requirements for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project using the above code parking ratios. As shown, direct application of City parking ratios to the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project program results in a City parking code requirement of 2,055 parking spaces, which overstates the amount of parking which will be needed to accommodate the mix of uses proposed within the Redevelopment project. However, as previously mentioned, there is an opportunity to share parking spaces based on the utilization profile of each land use component. 1 1 I I11 • .0A E N G I N E E R 5 SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 4 Based on the mix of uses proposed within both alternatives of the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project on the block south of Pacific View Avenue, the parking demand can be calculated using shared parking criteria as established by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) which lays out a calculation matrix for computing the project's realistic parking needs. The shared parking calculations included in this report are based on proposed land uses/mix of tenants for One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment, and reflects the most recent development tabulation presented in Table 2. Shared Parking Rationale and Basis Accumulated experience in parking demand characteristics indicates that a mixing of land uses results in an overall parking need that is less than the sum of the individual peak requirements for each land use. Shared Parking calculations recognize that different uses often experience individual peak parking demands at different times of day, or days of the week. When uses share a common parking footprint, the total number of spaces needed to support the collective whole is determined by adding parking profiles (by time of day or day of week), rather than individual peak ratios as represented in the City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (Chapter 231 - Off- Street Parking and Loading Provisions). The analytical procedures for Shared Parking Analyses are well documented in the Shared Parking publication by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and have been previously accepted by the City of Huntington Beach for the Plaza Almeria project and proposed Bella Terra project, for example. As for other local application, the City of Costa Mesa, and the City of Irvine, among others, have adopted Shared Parking procedures into their Zoning Ordinances based on the ULI techniques and individual parking studies, which validate and/or refine the ULI demand projections and profiles. Shared parking calculations for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project utilize peak parking ratios and hourly parking accumulations developed from field studies of single developments in free-standing settings, where travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the shared parking approach will result, at other than peak parking demand times, in an excess amount of spaces that will service the overall needs of One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project. l 1 A • E N G I N E E R S Shared Parking Example Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 5 Graphic below illustrates the typical parking demand variation for a 50,000 square foot office building on a typical weekday. It shows that the office reaches its peak parking demand of 200 spaces in the late morning, and uses a relatively high percentage of the parking between 10 am and 4 pm. Hourly Office Parking Demand 0 600 7.00 8 00 9,00 10 00 1100 12 00 100 2 00 3 00 4,00 500 6 00 7'00 8.00 9'00 AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Time of Day • E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 6 Similarly, the graphic below illustrates a typical parking demand for restaurant space totaling 25,000 square feet of floor area (area consists of several restaurants). The peak parking demand of 250 spaces occurs in the evening with moderate use during the middle of the day. 1 I 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Hourly Restaurant Parking Demand 1 OP oP oP OOP OP oP OQ OQ OoQ OQ 4 1 oOQ OOQ OQO ,`O O ADO 04V NO r ,50 b.(§, o A -ChO Time of Day I Without accounting for the hourly parking demand variations, the total parking required to serve both uses together would be 450 parking spaces (200 office + 250 restaurant). Merging the two hourly parking demand graphics together, as illustrated below, reveals the concept of shared parking. Using the hourly demand variations, a more realistic estimate of the parking needed to serve the two uses can be obtained. In essence,°by taking advantage of the significant differences in hourly parking demand between two uses, a well planned mixed use development will require fewer total parking spaces to serve the demand, resulting in more cost effective and aesthetically pleasing developments. In this case, 355 parking spaces would be needed, versus the stand alone totals of 450 spaces. • E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 7 Hourly Shared Parking Demand Il 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 OP Oi OP OP OP Oi OQ OQ OQ OQ OQ OQ OQ OQ OQ OQqO ,`O ,0 N.-O-O.O qO "O b O roo 1 Time of Day Shared Parking Ratios And Profiles The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of peak demand) are based on profiles developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and published in Shared Parking. The ULI publication presents hourly parking demand profiles for seven general land uses: office, retail, restaurant, cinema, residential (Central Business District: CBD and non-CBD), hotel (consisting of separate factors for guest rooms, restaurant/lounge, conference room, and convention area). These factors present a profile of parking demand over time and have been used directly, by land use type, in the analysis of this project. Since the primary project component for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project is office space, the ULI office use profiles are applied directly. In doing so, there is an intermediate step in expressing ULI profiles as a percentage of the week-long peak, thus arriving at a weekday profile and weekend profile each expressed as a percentage of the baseline parking ratio (ULI actually starts with separate ratios for weekday and weekend day, and develops profiles for each accordingly; we've found it more convenient to translate both profiles to a percent of expected maximum demand, which, for retail, turns out to be on a Saturday). The resulting profiles represent the most likely hourly parking demand profile, and are applied to a recommended parking ratio of I space per 250 SF (4.0 spaces per 1000 SF) of GLA for office uses consistent with City's parking code. U 1 E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 8 In addition, the office profile directly derived from ULI was utilized for the medical office land use. The peak parking ratio for medical office use exactly equals the City's Parking Code requirement of l space per 175 SF (5.71 spaces per 1000 SF). The restaurant use profile is based on a quality/sit-down restaurant (typically non fast-food). Like the office profiles, the restaurant profile derives exactly from the ULI baseline. The City's parking requirement for restaurants is I space/100 SF (10 spaces/1000 SF) for establishments with more than 12 seats, and I space/200 SF (5 spaces/1000 SF) for places with less than 12 seats. The restaurant parking ratio recommended as part of the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Shared Parking Criteria exactly matches the City code rate of 10 spaces/1000 SF of GBA. A fitness facility (i.e., health club) is not included in the ULI studies. Therefore, the fitness facility hourly parking profiles are based on an amalgamation of sports club operation data from actual LLG studies at typical sports clubs (i.e., 24-Hour Fitness, West Hollywood Sports Connection, Spectrum Club, etc.). The peak demand for the fitness facility is expected to occur in the early morning hours (6:00 AM - 8:00 AM) and the early evening hours (5:00 PM - 7:00 PM) of weekday, and the morning hours of a weekend day. Shared Parking Results for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Project Tables 4 and 5, attached, apply the ULI methodology directly and forecast the theoretical weekday and weekend shared parking requirements for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project, respectively , based upon the development summary presented in Table 2. As shown in Table 4, the theoretical peak parking requirement for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project during a weekday totals 1,855 parking spaces and occurs at 10:00 AM. As shown in 5, the theoretical peak parking requirement for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project during a weekend totals 448 parking spaces and occurs at 11:00 AM and 12:00 PM (noon). As a result, the total theoretical shared parking demand for the Redevelopment project is 1,855 parking spaces . With a proposed on-site parking supply of 1,760 parking spaces, a theoretical parking deficiency of 95 spaces is forecast. As a result, based on the parking demand characteristics of the mix of proposed uses within the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project and the theoretical shared parking demand analysis for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project, 95 parking spaces would need to be added to the existing parking supply of 1,760 spaces to accommodate the theoretical shared parking demand. A E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 9 PARKING SURVEY ANALYSIS U To determine the existing parking demand of the existing uses at One Pacific Plaza, parking surveys were conducted by Transportation Studies, Inc. (TSI) on a "typical" weekday and weekend day. The parking surveys were performed at hour intervals between 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM on Thursday February 12, 2004 and Saturday February 14, 2004 and consisted of counting the number of parked vehicles within five parking zones, which include the on-site surface parking areas and the five-level parking structure. Exhibit 4, attached, presents the five parking survey zones and indicates the parking supply within each zone. Please note that the parking area west of Building "G" within Zone II was included in the survey (to capture patrons of Building "G") but is not included in the parking supply number for the site. In addition, Please note that Zone I has restricted access between 6:00 AM and 5:00 PM to preserve the parking for the restaurants and to restrict office tenants from parking in this area. The results of the weekday parking surveys are summarized in Table 6. This table presents the parking demands at the study site for each hour of the weekday count day. As shown in Table 6, the study site experienced peak parking demands of 722 vehicles at 2:00 PM and 706 vehicles at 10:00 AM, which is the typical peak demand hour for the office land use. It should be noted that the card entry gate-controlled area of the parking structure (Zone IV) experienced a peak parking demand of 482 parking spaces of the Zone IV supply of 1,349 spaces. The results of the weekend parking surveys are summarized in Table 7. This table presents the parking demands at the study site for each hour of the weekend count day. As shown in Table 7, the study site experienced a peak parking demand of 210 vehicles at 9:00 PM, which is based primarily on the existing restaurant and nightclub uses on the eastern portion of the site in Zone I. Survey Data Shared Parking Demand Analysis In order to determine the peak parking requirement for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project utilizing the existing survey data, which is the most accurate approach, the current on site vacancy and proposed uses are combined with the existing parking demand within the shared parking model. Based on leasing information provided by the Muller Company, One Pacific Plaza currently has 112,924 SF of office vacancy and 2,653 SF of medical office vacancy. Tables 8 and 9, attached, presents an approach which applies the City code parking requirement and ULI time of day parking profiles to the vacant office and medical office square-footage as well as to the proposed 40,000 SF health club use for the weekday and weekend time frame, respectively, while directly applying the parking survey results as a time of day parking profile l I • E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 10 for the occupied square-footage within the current One Pacific Plaza development. As shown in Table 8, the peak parking requirement for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project during a weekday totals 1,273 parking spaces and occurs at 10:00 AM. As shown in Table 9, the peak parking requirement for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project during a weekend totals 436 parking spaces and occurs at 11:00 AM. As a result, the total parking survey data shared parking demand for the Redevelopment project is 1,273 parking spaces. With a proposed on-site parking supply of 1,760 parking spaces, a parking surplus of 487 spaces is forecast. While this a significant amount of surplus parking compared to the theoretical shared parking analysis, the parking survey data shared parking demand analysis indicates that there is currently adequate parking on site, particularly within the parking structure, to accommodate the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project. In addition, based on the proximity of the proposed health club to the parking structure in conjunction with valet parking operation for the existing quality restaurant (Buca di Beppo), the parking structure is a viable parking resource and will likely be utilized extensively. * * * * * * * * * * * * I I SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The Proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project consists of replacing the existing 8,660 square-foot (SF) restaurant/night club building, currently "Liquid Lounge", with a 40,000 SF health club and construction of a "Plaza" feature in the center area of the three existing office towers. The new parking supply for the site will be 1,760 parking spaces without any modification to the existing parking structure to provide additional spaces. 2. Direct application of City parking ratios to the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project program results in a City parking code requirement of 2,055 parking spaces . 2,055 parking spaces for the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project would result in a significant amount of excess parking spaces than which is actually needed to serve the project. 3. The Shared Parking Analysis indicates that the theoretical peak parking demand for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project (Table 4) during a weekday totals 1,855 parking spaces and occurs at 10:00 AM. In addition, the theoretical peak parking demand for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project (Table 5) during a weekend totals 445 parking spaces and occurs at 11:00 AM. With a proposed on-site parking supply of 1,760 parking spaces, a theoretical parking deficiency of 95 spaces is forecast. . . E N G I N E E R S Ms. Jennifer Blanchart THE MULLER COMPANY One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment Parking Study May 24, 2004 Page 11 4. The Survey Data Shared Parking Analysis indicates that the peak parking demand for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project (Table 8) during a weekday totals 1,273 parking spaces and occurs at 10:00 AM. In addition, the peak parking demand for the proposed One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project (Table 9) during a weekend totals 436 parking spaces and occurs at 11:00 AM. With a proposed on-site parking supply of 1,760 parking spaces, a parking surplus of 487 spaces is forecast. 1 I Based on the attached parking analysis , parking demand will be less than the code required number of spaces; and the proposed uses within the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project will not generate additional parking demand beyond the 1, 760 parking spaces proposed with the One Pacific Plaza Redevelopment project. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis for the Muller Company. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at (714) 641-1587. Very truly yours, LINSCOTT , LAW & ENSPAN , ENGINEERS 11-0.1J i I I Kell D. ab fry, P.E. Associ;4rincipal Attachments N \2500\2042532\Report\One Pacific Plaza Parking Demand Analysis Letter doc 1 I E N G I N E E R S A TABLE 1 EXISTING LAND USE SUMMARY One Pacific Plaza , Huntington Beach 7979 Center Avenue B 7887 Center Avenue C 7777 Center Avenue D 7711 Center Avenue E 7755 Center Avenue F 7677 Center Avenue G 7801 Center Avenue "TOTAL EXISTINGBUILD :'LAND°USE BUILDING SIZE GLA Restaurant 9,982 SF Restaurant 8,660 SF Office 94,506 SF Office 95,101 SF Office 191,895 SF Medical Office 55,616 SF Medical Office 11,128 SF 466,888 SF A E N G I N E E R S TABLE 2 PROPOSED LAND USE SUMMARY Beach Pointe , Huntington Beach I BUILDING yID_ . , ,,.ADDRESS`.IA =USE: -BLT-- SIZE GLA A 7979 Center Avenue Restaurant 9,982 SF B 7887 Center Avenue Health Club 40,000 SF C 7777 Center Avenue Office 94,506 SF D 7711 Center Avenue Office 95,101 SF E 7755 Center Avenue Office 191,895 SF F 7677 Center Avenue Medical Office 55,616 SF G 7801 Center Avenue Medical Office 11,128 SF TOTAL PROP OSED :'BUILDJNG: AREA -498,228 SF 0 46 E N G I N E E R S CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT [11 Beach Pointe, Huntington Beach Z.anc' Use' Office [2] Medical Office No. 1 [3] Medical Office No. 2 Restaurant Health Club 'TOTAL PARKING CODE TABLE 3 bi"Huntiug#i3n 1 each Spaces ode:P rl ng'Ratio '[11 Required 381,502 SF I Space per 250 SF 1526 55,616 SF 1 Space per 175 SF 165 11,128 SF 1 Space per 175 SF 64 9,982 SF 1 Space per 100 SF 100 40,000 SF I Space per 200 SF 200 OIREMEN1 2055 Notes: (I ] Source. Chapter 231 04, Off-Street Parking & Loading Spaces Required . City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance [2] Consists of three office buildings [3] 165 parking spaces allocated per agreement for 7677 Center Avenue building (Bldg. F) and remaining 153 required parking spaces are located in parking area off-site n \2500\2042532\Tables\2532 City Parking Code Requirement.xls I E N G I N E E R S TABLE 4 WEEKDAY MIXED-USE SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Beach Pointe, Huntington Beach (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Land Use Health Club Size (SF) 40,000,SF P Rate ®1 SP/200'SF R 'd S aces - S aces 1 200 Ad'ustments n/a Seasonal Ad'. 100% Percent No. of Time of Peak Parking of Da -,,Demand S aces 6 00 AM 80% 160 7.00 AM 80% 160 8:00 AM 65% 130 9.00 AM 55% 110 10:00 AM 50% 100 11.00 AM 40% 80 NOON 40% 80 1 00 PM 40% 80 2.00 PM 30% 60 3 00 PM 50% 100 4.00 PM 67% 134 5:00 PM 90% 180 6 00 PM 100% 200 7 00 PM 95% 190 8.00 PM 50% 100 9.00 PM 10% 20 10 00 PM 10% 20 11 00 PM 0% 0 MIDNIGHT 0% 0 Medical Office Restaurant Office , . Comparison 66,744 9,982 SF 381,502 SF' w/Proposed @ 1 SP/175 SF Q I SP/100 SF 1 SP/250 SF- Parking S aces 229 S aces 100 S aces 1;526='' Supply n/a n/a n/a 100% 100% 100%' . Total , . Percent No. of Percent No.,of Percent - No. of Shared Hourly, Surplus/ of Peak Parking of Peak Parking of Peak Parking Parking Parking Uef ciency, Demand S aces Demand S aces Demand , S aces Demand. Supply i 3% 7 0% 0 3% 46 213 1760 1547 20% 46 0% 0 20% 305 511 1760 1249 63% 144 0% 0 63% 961 1,235 1760 525 93% 213 0% 0 93% 1,419 1,742 1760 18 100% 229 0% .0 100% 1,526: 1,855 - , 1760; .-951 100% 229 0% 0 100% 1,526 1,835 1760 -75 90% 206 0% 0 90% 1,373 1,659 1760 101 90% 206 0% 0 90% 1,373 1,659 1760 101 97% 222 0% 0 97% 1,480 1,762 1760 -2 93% 213 0% 0 93% 1,419 1,732 1760 28 77% 176 0% 0 77% 1,175 1,485 1760 275 47% 108 70% 70 47% 717 1,075 1760 685 23% 53 90% 90 23% 351 694 1760 1066 7% 16 100% 100 7% 107 413 1760 1347 7% 16 100% 100 7% 107 323 1760 1437 3% 7 100% 100 3% 46 173 1760 1587 3% 7 90% 90 3% 46 163 1760 1597 0% 0 70% 70 0% 0 70 1760 1690 0% 0 50% 50 0% 0 50 1760 1710 Notes. [I] Medical Office parking space total consists of 165 parking spaces allocated to 7677 Center Avenue per agreement and 64 parking spaces per code for 7801 Center Avenue it \2500\2042532\tables\2532 Weekday Shared Parking 3-1-04 xIs E N G I N E E R 5 Land Use Health Club Medical Office Size (SF) 40,000 SF 66,744 P Rate @ 1 SP/200 SF @ 1 SP/175 SF R 'd,S"aces S aces 200 S aces 11 229 Ad'ustments n/a n/a Seasonal•Adl. 100% 100% Percent No., of Percent No. of Time of Peak Parking of Peak Parking ofDa - Demand S aces . Demand S aces 6-00 AM 10% 20 0% 0 7.00 AM 30% 60 3% 7 8:00 AM 85% 170 10% 23 9.00 AM 70% 140 13% 30 10:00 AM 50% 100 13% 30 11:00 AM 75% 150 '17% 39 NOON 75% 150 17% 39 1.00 PM 50% 100 13% 30 2:00 PM 45% 90 10% 23 3.00 PM 50% 100 7% 16 4.00 PM 45% 90 7% 16 5.00 PM 25% 50 3% 7 6.00 PM 10% 20 3% 7 7:00 PM 5% 10 3% 7 800 PM 5% 10 3% 7 9.00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 10.00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 11 00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 MIDNIGHT 0% 0 0% 0 WEEKEND MIXED-USE SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Beach Pointe , Huntington Beach TABLE 5 (3)(4) (5) (6) Restaurant Office, Comparison. 9,982 SF 381,502 SF w/Proposed Q 1 SP/100 SF 1 SP/250 SF Parking S aces 100 S aces 1,526 Supply n/a n/a ' 100% 100% Total Percent No. of Percent , No. of Shared' Hourly Surplus/ of Peak Parking of'Peak Parking , Rsrking Parking Deficiency Demand S aces Demand . , S 'ace4 ' Demand supply -, (+/-)` 0% 0 0% 0 20 1760 1740 0% 0 3% 46 113 1760 1647 0% 0 10% 153 346 1760 1414 0% 0 13% 198 368 1760 1392 0% 0 13% 198 328 1760 1432 0% 0 17% 259 , 448 1760 4312 0% 0 17% 259 448 1760 1312 0% 0 13% 198 328 1760 1432 0% 0 10% 153 266 1760 1494 0% 0 7% 107 223 1760 1537 0% 0 7% 107 213 1760 1547 70% 70 3% 46 173 1760 1587 90% 90 3% 46 163 1760 1597 100% 100 3% 46 163 1760 1597 100% 100 3% 46 163 1760 1597 100% 100 0% 0 100 1760 1660 90% 90 0% 0 90 1760 1670 70% 70 0% 0 70 1760 1690 50% 50 0% 0 50 1760 1710 Notes (I ] Medical Office parking space total consists of 165 parking spaces allocated to 7677 Center Avenue per agreement and 64 parking spaces per code for 7801 Center Avenue n•\2500\2042532\tables\2532 Weekend Shared Parking 3-01-04 As E N G I N E E R S TABLE 6 Tinie ' Zone-1, e n- Oecu"' ie&S aces - EXISTING WEEKDAY PEAK PARKING DEMAND THURSDAY FEBRUARY 12, 2004 (9:00 AM TO 9:00 PM) One Pacific Plaza, Huntington Beach Zone}II - Occu ied. S aces Zone U1,,•ZoneXV Occu ied, S aces Occu ied;S' aces:' Zone, V Total . Peak- - Occu WS aces --.Parkin Demand: 9:00AM 5 32 47 366 138 588 10:00 AM 8 36 61 474 127 706 11:00 AM 8 43 42 416 135 644 12:00 PM 10 33 36 394 110 583 1:00 PM 11 48 60 454 129 702 2:00 PM,9 .52 .51 482 129`..722 3:00 PM 11 68 42 389 125 635 4:00 PM 10 69 45 458 114 696 5:00 PM 20 59 31 136 49 295 6:00 PM 32 47 31 109 36 255 7:00 PM 50 38 27 23 14 152 8:00 PM 58 35 24 19 12 148 E N G I N E E R S Time Be 'n TABLE 7 EXISTING WEEKEND PEAK PARKING DEMAND SATURDAY FEBRUARY 14, 2004 (9:00 AM TO 9:00 PM) One Pacific Plaza , Huntington Beach Zone H = ..Occu i&1 S• aces Zone-111 - Occu ied,•S aces 'zone Iv'_. ` ' _ _ Zone V''`'; "{as " l otal Peak : Occu ied S aces.,N dOccn 'edkS aces;-.;YParkin Demand :; 9:00 AM 5 99 57 17 27 205 10:00 AM 6 79 72 19 33 209 11:00 AM 8 68 72 23 35 206 12:00 PM 26 25 8 7 12 78 1:00 PM 29 25 9 8 12 83 2:00 PM 44 28 11 6 10 99 3:00 PM 58 9 5 6 9 87 4:00 PM 81 27 5 5 9 127 5:00 PM 87 34 5 5 11 142 6:00 PM 119 61 4 6 3 193 7:00 PM 125 64 4 6 1 200 :8:00 PM 109"'93-.210'..• E N G I N E E R S TABLE 8 WEEKDAY SURVEY DATA SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Beach Pointe, Huntington Beach (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) Vacant Parking Vacant Land Use Health Club Medical=Office Survey Data Office Comparison Size (SF)40,000 SF 2,653 112,924SF w/Proposed P Rate ®1 SP/200 SF ®1 SP/175 SF 2/12/2004 1 SP/250 SF Parking R 'd S -aces S aces 200 S aces 15 S aces 452 Supply Ad'ustments,ft/a n/a n/a Seasonal,Ad':100%100%100%_Total Percent No. of Percent No. of Percent No. of Percent No: of Shared Hourly,Surplus/ Time of Peak Parking of Peak Parking of Peak Parking of Peak Parking Parking Parking ,Deficiency of Da 'Demand S aces Demand S aces Demand S aces Demand `S aces_Demand,;Supply 6:00 AM 80% 160 3% 0 --ND 3% 14 174 1760 1586 7.00 AM 80% 160 20% 3 --ND 20% 90 253 1760 1507 8:00 AM 65% 130 63% 9 ND 63% 285 424 1760 1336 9:00 AM 55% 110 93% 14 81%588 93% 420 1,132 1760 628 10:00 AM 50% 100 100% 15 98%706 100% 452 1,273,1.760 487 11:00 AM 40% 80 100% 15 89%644 100% 452 1,191 1760 569 NOON 40% 80 90% 14 83%583 90% 407 1,084 1760 676 1:00 PM 40% 80 90% 14 97%702 90% 407 1,203 1760 557 2.00 PM 30% 60 97% 15 100%722 97% 438 1,235 1760 525 3.00 PM 50% 100 93% 14 88%635 93% 420 1,169 1760 591 4 00 PM 67% 134 77% 12 96%696 77% 348 1,190 1760 570 5 00 PM 90% 180 47% 7 41%295 47% 212 694 1760 1066 6 00 PM 100% 200 23% 3 35%255 23% 104 562 1760 1198 7.00 PM 95% 190 7% I 21%152 7% 32 375 1760 1385 8 00 PM 50% 100 7% 1 21%148 7% 32 281 1760 1479 9.00 PM 10% 20 3% 0 ND 3% 14 34 1760 1726 10:00 PM 10% 20 3% 0 --ND 3% 14 34 1760 1726 11:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 --ND 0% 0 0 1760 1760 MIDNIGHT 0% 0 0% 0 --ND 0% 0 0 1760 1760 Notes ND mNo Data collected n.\2500\2042532 \tables\2532 Weekday Survey Shared Parking xls E N G I N E E R S TABLE 9 WEEKEND SURVEY DATA SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Beach Pointe , Huntington Beach (1) Land Use Health Club Size (SF) 40,000 SF Pkg Rate @ 1SP/200 SF Rq'd Spaces S aces 200 Adjustments n/a Seasonal.Adj.: 100% Percent No. of Time ofPeak Parking of Da - Demand S aces 6.00 AM 10% 20 7:00 AM 30% 60 8.00 AM 85% 170 9 00 AM 70% 140 10:00 AM 50% 100 11:00 AM 75% 150 NOON 75% I50 1.00 PM 50% 100 2:00 PM 45% 90 3:00 PM 50% 100 4:00 PM 45% 90 500 PM 25% 50 6.00 PM 10% 20 7:00 PM 5% 10 8.00 PM 5% 10 9:00 PM 0% 0 1000 PM 0% 0 11.00 PM 0% 0 MIDNIGHT 0% 0 (2) Vacant Medical'Office 2,653 @ 1SP/175 SF S aces 15 n/a 100% Percent - No. of of Peak Parking Demand S aces 0% 0 3% 0 10% 2 13% 2 13% 2 17% 3 17% 3 13% 2 10% 2 7% 1 7% 1 3% 0 3% 0 3% 0 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 (3) (4) (5) (6) Parking Vacant Survey Data Office Comparison 112,924 SF w/Proposed 2/14/2004 1 SP/250 SF Parking Spaces 452 Supply u/a 100°/a Total Percent 'No.' of Percent No. of Shared -Hourly- 'Surplus/ ofPeak Parking- ofPeak Parking Parking Parking; Deficiency, Demand--• S aces Demand L S aces ;Demand- • Supply, ND 0% 0 20 1760 1740 ND 3% 14 74 1760 1686 -- ND 10% 45 217 1760 1543 98% 205 13% 59 406 1760 1354 100% 209 13% 59 370 1760 1390 98% 206 17% 77 436,' '17,60 1324' 37% 78 17% 77 308 1760 1452 40% 83 13% 59 244 1760 1516 47% 99 10% 45 236 1760 1524 41% 87 7% 32 220 1760 1540 60% 127 7% 32 250 1760 1510 68% 142 3% 14 206 1760 1554 92% 193 3% 14 227 1760 1533 95% 200 3% 14 224 1760 1536 100% 210 3% 14 234 1760 1526 -- ND 0% 0 0 1760 1760 ND 0% 0 0 1760 1760 ND 0% 0 0 1760 1760 ND 0% 0 0 1760 1760 Note ND - No Data collected n \2500\2042532\tables\2532 Weekend Survey Shared Parking xls ---A --- I - - - F NO SCALE LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN E N 0 1 N E E R S I J.LU4Ini« rim O t 4 "' I Lr A' NIEP V SOURCE: THOMAS BROS. KEY PROJECT SITE L .W ucv IL4. a air PI ©2001 Thomas Bros. Ma EXHIBIT 1 VICINITY MAP ONE PACIFIC PLAZA/BEACH POINTE, HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSMITTAL TO Planning Department CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 T 714-536-5271 PROJECT Muller Company - Beach Point / Huntington Beach REF NO 2004-21 (Purposed Health Club on Center Drive) DATE November 9, 2004 TRANSMIT A ARCHITECTS City of Huntington Beg6h ?tr15 2004 10: Sc/ - 0 ENCLOSED UNDER SEPARATE COVER UPS PICK UP MAIL MESSENGER CA OVERNIGHT FAX [ page(s) total ] DESCRIPTION: Enclosed please find the Parking Demand Analysis reference in the Project Description of the above- referenced project, submitted November 8, 2004. Please contact me at 949 -474-1775 x237, should you have any questions. Thank you. IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE SINCERELY, COPIES TO: Roger Deitos, AIA Principal F \Prolecls\MuVWIUL020 18\Correspondence\CITY Planning Tr 110904 doc GAA ARCHITECTS, INC. 4 Park Plaza, Suite 120, Irvine, CA 92614 T' 949 474 1775 F. 949 553 9133 p DtS PREPARED FOR OPE COUNTY ASSES -PURPOSES ONLWE ACCURACYUSES ANY LIAR LITY FOR OTHER USES. 040GHT ORANGE COUNTY IASS SSOR 1995 X92 6' 42 • N .. 1/2,SE //4, SEC. 14, r 5S., R. 11W /0$ G) L12AC. 'P2 16.02 AC, 942- 34 06 AVENUE 50' 1230 \ 5 TRAC a d E. 1/4 COR. SEC. 14 -5-11R. .63-28 200'J 5 NO.5194 r92' 10 6 200' 2 S0' MC FADDEN $ 3.20 R S 1)5-49 PM 81-12 1.07AC. y0 PM. 144-31 zbi.47' /6 ?3 97' 168 So' (SUGAR) 0 if9 97' 05 e°a 03See' PAR. . 3.7j0 AC. z9o,32 CENTER AVENUE 0i3 7 MARCH 1966 07 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK & NO 5194TR M. M. 2/9-24 25.. PARCEL MAP ) P. M 81-12,144-31,179-07 PARCEL NUMBERS SHOWN IN CIRCLES I I Off, N !02' ASSESSOR'SI MAP BOOK142 PAGE 34 COUNTY OF ORANGE 2 1•"200r sMu r ,.