Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInitial Plan IPZR2004016 - Supporting Documentsr 00 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 FAx No : (714) 374-1540 PHONE No: (714) 536-5271 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET To: HARRY MONCK FROM: RAMI TALLEH FAX NUMBER : DATE : 9/28/04 (714) 246-3601 COMPANY : TOTAL No. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 3 PHONE NUMBER: (714) 5366748 RE: 1102 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SUN"N"SANDS MOTEL URGENT FOR REVIEW PLEASE COMMENT PLEASE REPLY PLEASE PUBLISH NOTES COMMENTS: V 4k HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Huntington Beach • Department of Planning CONFERENCE NOTES PROJECT: ,SU „5 I LOCATION:C. DATE: L NOTES TAKEN BY: TN IN ATTENDANCE:1>11*1. MEETING PHONE SUMMARY: 1 6-C rrh' b2.a u.¢._ CC) -0, an Ir l s L co e t C w So U r 2 \l- ."2, ow.,©k"-Li 1 . CD ftvK! n t it i L,- C) L/ , lam. V d 2, U 1 d / 1)0 st-Q Glri (J Urn `mot ct3 1NL ACTION: COPY TO: (g forms/confnte/6 01 rev ) HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Huntington Beach • Department of Planning CONFERENCE NOTES PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE: IN ATTENDANCE: SUMMARY: 0 ACTION: COPY TO: NOTES TAKEN BY: MEETING PHONE forms/confnte/6 01 rev ) .AA 'City of untie t0 0 n Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Phone 536-5271 Fax 374-1540 374-1648 June 23, 2004 Keith Wichnei 17400 Biookluust St , Suite # 102 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Re: ZONING COMPLIANCE LETTER NO. 04-20 (1102 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 - Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 024-038-09) Dear Mi Wichnei This zoning compliance letter is provided in response to youi letter received and dated lune 8, 2004 Please be advised the subject piopeity is currently zoned SP5-2-CZ, (Downtown Specific Plan- Distiict 2-Coastal Zone) with a General Plan designation of RH-30-d-sp (Residential High Density- 30 units pet net acie with design and specific plan overlays) District 2 of the Downtown Specific Plan is a tesidential zoning distiict and permits residential uses Development of single-family homes on each parcel is petmitted subject to the base zoning district requirements, compliance with Planning Policy No 63R, Single Fumily Resiclential Developments in the Downtown Specific Plan (see enclosed), and the plan check process Currently the subject parcels are developed with a swimming pool and are part of a laigai development consisting of four other parcels containing a motel (a nonconforming use), with associated paiking, and landscaping Finally, according to the February 18, 2004, Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) (Map No 06059C-0242H) issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the City of Huntington Beach, the subject piopeity is located in Flood Zone X However as stated in a letter addressed to David Kekich dated May 24, 2004 (see enclosed), removal of the pool fiom the two subject paicels and the construction of two single-family homes is subject to the iequirements outlined in the May 24, 2004 letter Specifically, if a development consists or rehabilitation, an expansion of less than 10%, of demolition of less than 10% to existing facilities, approval of a conditional use permit IS iequiied The conditional use permit piocess involves a minimum six to eight month process, a public hearing before the City's Planning Commission, and a filing tee of $6,815 Additional entitlements and fees may be necessary upon review of more site- specific plans and information If you have any questions, please contact me at (714) 374-1682 Sincerely,;11r Rami Talleh, Assistant Planner Enclosures cc Fleib Fauland, Principal Planner Wayne Cai 'alho, Associate Plannei -J-4 AT City o f Huntington B each 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFO RNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Phone Fax May 24, 2004 536-5271 374-1540 374-1648 David A. Kekich Attn: Phil Lenda 228 Seventh Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: ZONING COMPLIANCE LETTER 04-13 (1100-1102 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach , CA 92648 - Assessor 's Parcel Numbers : 024-038-09 & 10) Dear Mr. Kekich: Thank you for your letter dated April 12, 2004. In your letter you ask whether you can build two homes on two of the six lots comprising a development consisting of a motel with associated parking, landscaping and a swimming pool. In order to answer your questions, a thorough research of the site's history, entitlement and building permit files was conducted along with a zoning analysis. The initial research indicates that the motel site has been in operation since approximately 1958. The primary question is whether the pool for the existing motel on the subject property could be demolished/eliminated to permit the construction of two single family residential units. The original building permits and Certificate of Occupancy reveal that an 18 unit motel was built in 1958 and a pool was added in 1961 as an amenity to the motel site. In 1983, the City approved Administrative Review No. 82-49, Use Permit No. 83-2• and Negative Declaration. No. 83-1, a request to permit the expansion of the motel site. However, construction associated with the entitlements were not pursued as a result of the adjacent property owner rescinding authorization for the consolidation of the two lots with the motel property as required by a condition of approval. We have attached some of the background information for your review. With the adoption of the Downtown Specific Plan (SP 5) in 1983, the motel site became a non-conforming use. As a result, any development proposed at the site is subject to the non- conforming provisions of SP 5. Pursuant Section 4.2.01, General Provisions, and further clarified by Planning Policy No. 69 (attached), rehabilitation proposals must meet certain criteria. Based on this information, it has been determined that if a development consists of rehabilitation. an expansion of less than 1011%%. or demolition of less than 10% to existing facilities, approval of a conditional use permit is required. Please see Scenario B of policy No. 6Q 'therefore. -.0 permit the demolition.'elimination of the pool from the motel sire and -er-Mil he construLaon r b0 homes. a conditional 'a_e permit is recurred. Mr. Kekich re: 1100-1102 PCH May 24, 2004 Page Two of Two The conditional use permit process involves a minimum six to eight month process, a public hearing before the City's Planning Commission, and a filing fee of $6,815. Please note, additional entitlements and fees may be necessary upon review of more site specific plans and information. For more information on the conditional use permit process or any further questions, please contact me at (714) 374-1684 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Rosemary Medel, Associate Planner Enclosures cc: Herb Fauland, Principal Planner Wayne Carvalho, Associate Planner ho 9 á ii11T .i(T W U H CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACI+ DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT This is to certify that the 17 unit motel and office under Building P.rmit No exia t n+ and is id.ntifvd os and described as in the build ing owned by 1 ii I. as authorized complies with the provisions of all pertinent laws, codes, ordinances and any imputed conditions for the use descrilyd and classified as an MAXIMUM OCCUPANT LOAD PERMITTED Ne rice: This Certificate of Occupancy SHALL BE posted in a conspicuous place on the premises and shall not be removed except by the Building Official, N .1 n ,it occupancy John F. Behrens O".cio. Of eutk9 U & COiemuiiify Oe.lopin.nr By 'l:l R d 9)3ie • CIT't OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ItV'IIIK.IIN 111CH To FILE - A.R. No. 82-49 and From Glen K. Godfrey U.P. No. 83-2 Subject SUN N SANDS MOTEL Date March 28, 1983 1102 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Ms. Simmet called me today. She is forwarding a letter wherein she revokes her permission to enter into an agreement for the applicant to purchase her-property so as to construct an expansion to the existing motel over an existing property line. She has also indicated that she would not be a partyto the filing of a parcel map. GKG: js I I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 92648 BUILDINO DIVISION (714152b 5241 PLANNINC DIVISION 17 141 530 1271 P.O. BOX 190 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 2, 1984 Jitendra P. Barot x'1102. Pacific' Coast Highway -''Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Barot: Staff has evaluated your request to construct a motel on lots 5 6 6, block 111 of Huntington Beach Tract (1110-1112 Pacific Coast Highway). You may not be aware of the recent adoption of the Downtown Specific Plan which rezoned this location to District 2, a residential area exclusively. A motel at this location is not a permitted use. It is indeed unfortunate that you are unable to proceed with your prior approval for expansion. Sin r y, Glen Godfrey, Deputy Dirc'c t r Development Services GG:SP:sr ;, k=o-4-:.•t- - -- - • • BOARD of ZOni(1G RDJUSTME11TS.I1 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH •CALIFORNIA 3 PHONE (714) 536-5271 NCCATIVD DECLARATION NO. 83-1 and UST, PERMIT NO. 83 -2 (In conjunction with A.R. No . 82-49) Applicant: Request: Location:. Date of Approval: P.O. BOY 190 -9264e Dar.t Commissariat 16168 Beach Blvd. - #261 Huntington Beach, CA To permit expansion of existing ,,motel having non-conforming setbacks. 1102 Pacific Coast Highway February 23, 1983 FINDINGS: 1.-,The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not he detrimental to.,_ a. The qencral welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; h. Property and improvements -inthe-vicinity of such use or building. I I`-k_, 4.,}Density and lot coverage -are in conformance with the'current existing requirements.4 The addition to the visitor-serving facility will be an economic Land Use. '3."' The proposal is consistent with the City 's General Plan of 2. The granting of a use5permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of, Huntington Beach. ;enhancement to the area. `<_ 1 0 NEGATIVE Drcr,ARATIO NO. 83-1 and USC PT:RNIT NO. 83-2 (In conj . with A.R. No. 82-49) App cant : ttr. Dara Commissariat CONDITIONS Or APPROVAL: A. TO BC COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OE BUILDING PERMITS: • 1. The conceptual plot plan received January 11, 1983, and elevations submitted October 28, 1982, shall be the approved layout. A revised plot plan, with elevations, shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval providing the following modifications: a. Parking layout modifications to the existing unit, proper setbacks, elevations reflecting the height of the building not exceeding thirty-five (35) foot. b. Include all existing structures that will be removed (canopy, etc.) . c. Show access ingre9s and egress provided to the alley. d. The existinq building at the north end shall be structurally modified no as to be in conformance with the rear yard requirements in the C-4 District. c. No encroachment of structural support columns in to the required turning area for parking. IC such plan complies with the modifications outlined by the hoard, said plan shall be approved and'made a permanent part of the administrative file. , 2. A parcel map shall be filed combining Parcels 9 and 10 shown on Assessor 's map into one (1) parcel pr4or to issuance of building permits (All property owners' signatures arc required on the parcel map). , GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. All cxistinq'non-conforming signs shall be removed. Proposed signago shall be in conformance with the, City's Sign Ordinance. 2. Dedication of 7-1/2 feet ohall be provided for allay purposes. ` 3. The project shall comply with all applicable City ordinances. -2- ?rFGATIVC DCCLARAT[ON N0. R3-1 and USE Pt UP NO. 83-2 in conj with A.R. No. 82-49) Applicant. Mr. Dara Commissarial. In its approval action, the Board of Zoning Adjustments considered the following issues relating to the conceptual plan: Parking layout; Lot area, Lot width and lot depth. The Department of Development Services will perform a comprehensive plan check relating to all ordinance Code requirements upon submittal of your completed structural drawings. Please be advised that the Board of Zoning Adjustments reviews the conceptual plan as a basic request for entitlement of the use applied for in relation to the vicinity in which it is proposed. The con- ceptual plan should not be construed as a precise plan reflecting conformance to all Ordinance Code requirements. It is recbmmended that you immediately pursue completion of the Conditions of Approval and address all requirements of the Huntington Doach Ordinance Code in order to expedite the processing of your total application. I hereby certify that Negative Declaration No. 83-1 (with Conditions imposed as outlined in AdminisLrativo Review No. 82-49 ) and Use Permit No. 83-2 were approved by the Doard of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, California on February 23, 1983, upon the foregoing conditions and citations. Sincerely, Glen K. Go ray, Secretary Secretary of the Doard -3- 0 A BOARD of ZQf((1G ADJUSTMenTS .aI r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH-CALIFORNIA -NOTICE: or ACTION- DATE :February 24, 1983 APPLICANT:Dara Commissariat SUBJECT:Negative Declaration No. 83-1 and /.0 BOX 190,91648 PUONE(714) 536.527; Your applic: Lion was acted upon by the Huntington peach Board of zoning Ad ustmentrs on February 23, 1983 and your request was: CONDITIONALLY APPROVCD X (sec attached) CONTINUED UNTIL WITHDRAWN APPROVED DCNICD RCrrRRrn TO TIM PLANNING COMMISSION (data certain) Under the provi,ions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the Board of Zoning Adjustments is final unless an appeal is filed by the Planning Commission by you or by an interested party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the action and grounds by which the applicant or interested party dooms himself aggrieved. Said appeal mugt be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred and sixty ttve ($165.) dollars and suhmittcd to the Secretary of the Planning Commission within tan (10) days of the data of the Doard'a decision. The last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee for the above noted application is March 7, 1983 Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any application becomes null and void one (1) l*car after the final approval, unless actual construction has begun. Sincnr y, Men K .'Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments ^-q 'r'- _,.I __ .w , -' .. , _"- . •d .I/1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH-CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 190-97648 PHONE (714) 336-5271 I ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-49 (In conj .'w/U.P. 83-2 & N.D. 83-1) Applicant: Request: Location: Date of Approval: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A. TO 1. Dara Commissariat 16168 Beach Blvd. - 1261 Huntington Beach, CA To permit an expansion to an :isting motel. 1102 Pacific Coast Highway February 23, 1983 BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: The conceptual plot plan received January 11, 1983 and elevations submitted October 28, 1982, shall be the approved layout.- A revised plot plan, with elevations, shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board for review and approval including Conditions of Approval imposed in Use Permit No. 83-2.': The following plans shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board: a.' Landscape and irriaation'plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. b. Rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. If such plans comply with, the modifications outlined by the Board, said plans shall be approved and made a permanent part of the administrative file. _ BOARD of ZOlif1G ADJUSTfEt1TS ADMINLSTRATIVr ICVIDW NO. 8 2-19 (In conj. w/U.P. 83 -2 & N.D. 83-1) A licant: Dara Commissa-int. 2. Low volume heads shall be used on all showers. 3. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other.surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 4. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall he constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNCL contours of the property. The interior noise levels of all dwelling units shall not exceed the California insulation standards of 45 D[3A community noise equivalent level. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person oxpcricnrcd in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permits. All measures recommended to mitigate noise to a.:ceptable levels shall be incorporated into the design of the prcjoct. 5. If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or recreation area energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 6. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the building department. The Department of Development Services will perform a comprehensive plan check relating to all Ordinance Code requirements upon submittal of your completed structural drawings. Please bo advised that the Board of Zoning Adjustments reviews the conceptual plan as a basic request for entitlement of the use applied for in relation to the vicinity in which it is proposed . The con- ceptual plan should not be construed as a precise plan reflecting conformance to all Ordi-ance Coda requirements. it is recommended that you immediately pursue completion of the Conditions of Approval and address all requirements of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code in order to expedite the processing of your total application. I hereby certify that Administrative Review No. 0 2-49 (In conj. w/ U.P. 83-2 and N.D. 83-1 ) was approved by the Poarcl of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, California on :abruary 23, 1983, upon the o"goipJc /,47pditj,on and citations.- Glen K. Go ray, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments -2- 0 Minutes : H.D. Board of Zoning Adjustments rehruary 21, 1983 Page rive a. Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works. B. GENERAL CONDITION: NOES: None ABSTAIN: None 976 of the City's code. AYCS: Godfrey, Crosby, Smith, Parker, Vogelsang 1. All existing non-conforming signs shall be removed and any signs proposed shall be in conformance with Article *NBGATIVI' DECLARATION NO. 83-1/USE PERMIT NO. 83-2 The administrative review is required to allow the construction of a motel in this C-3 (General Business District) Zone. `Secretary Godfrey informed all-concernad that certain requirements be met before issuance ,of a building permit to assure, conformance to existing zoning, require- -5- BZA 2/23/83 eliminating any possibility of a dispute in,the future .'. To permit expansion of existing motel having non-conforming setbacks. Heard in conjunction with ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW _NO. J2-49 To permit an expansion to an existing motel. Applicant : Mr. Dara Commissariat. Secretary Godfrey explained that the use permit request for expansion to an existing motel is a legally non-conforming structure with relation to current setback requirements. The use permit approval, if granted, will allow the non-conforming aspect to remain with certain modifications to the existing stricture recommended by staff and conditioned under Administrative Review No. 82-49. The proposed structure, prior to construction over existing lot lines, will requir., filing of a tentative parcel map. ,'The situation is complicated by the fact that the applicant is'leasing both parcels - > over a long term - from two property owners . Secretary Godfrey stated the Board is in receipt of a letter from one of the`property owners (Barbara Simmet), stating that under the terms of the existing lease on stbjgct property , she has the right tc 'acquire'the motel improvements upon '..emination of the lease. As such, her position is that all improvements on her property be kept within the boundary of her property and not integrated by boune,-ry-crossing improvements on property of which she 'has no interest therein. By, requesting that a parcel map be filed and recorded prior ,to building permits being issued, will require both property owners cooperation and acceptance of the recombining of two parcels into a single parcel, thereby 0 .Minutes: II.D. Board of Zoninq Adjustments February 23, 1983 Dagc Six ments by the proposed building and substantial conformance with the existing building. The public hearing was opened by Acting Chairman Crosby. Dara Commiagariat (Applicant) introduced himself to the Board. Ile mentioned that aq to the height of the building, setbacks, etc. they will comply with all modifications outlined by the Board. Mr. Jitendra Barrot, other property owner, responded to the letter received by the Board from Barbara Simmet (present) opposing expansion over the boundary on to her property. ,He stated that prior to today's hearing negotiations transpired wherein an offer to purchase Ms. Simmet's portion of property under the lease was made. There being no one else present to speak in`favor'orapposition of the applicant's request, the Public hearing was closed.' ON MOTION BY CROSBY AND SECOND BY VOGELSANG, USC PERMIT NO. 83-2 (IN CONJUNCTION WITH N.D. NO. 83-1 AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 82-49) WAS APPROVED, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOLLOWING, BY VOTE AS FOLLOWS: FINDINGS: i 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to., a." The general welrare of persons residing or working An the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. - ' 2. The granting of a use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington.Beach. The proposal is consistent with the.City's General -Plan of Land Use. 4. Density and lot coverage are in conformance with the current -existing requirements. 5. The addition to the visitor-serving facility will be an economic enhancement to the area. -6- BZA 2/23/83 l DOWNTOWN _ .,CIFIC PLAN PROCESSING DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS December 11, 1996 +J)cv'41Ol! fG t iccp ;r i?i,,` :G> 'r x::,` A;ic #io s ;:et ac v" 'axi4tigr.; 1angnni' ` , r rr v`f,i f•fL, tf x.>f '•,iS a`.;F„ for,..v;nY„XIi`j`Iv ,> r¢v J.rH`r.., ,'f i f`` v 4 ,° `ry;4 u,i ,i,`,r<f :. r ' '•<f , ,.required, A ,w;; "Aeyeloplncilt.•_'.,: ;; ,> f: fr ;iv.- ter,, ; < fral.r r r „•r..„ f.ffr r.r.?f,.a/^fti. .ids r,r,:f'+'2,:"x `f``N< 'v%,• fl°'' ,. .. ,,, f . `: : ,.."`,.. wf + r „` l` `, .r<. f n ,..f f , r iY Yew,: A. Seismic Retrofit/ No Tenan t Improvement No < 1/3 $ value of sauce use - no increase to building I eighUtlensity ------------- lt. itchuh 10% Expansion 50% Demolished/ i ci;onstructed Same use - no increase to height/density C. Rehuh 10% Expansion 50% Demolished/ lteconsti ucted Sane use - no increase to height/density t). Expansion 10% Expansion Same use - no increase to height/density No No Yes > 1/3 value of building No Yes < 1/3 $ value of Yes building Yes > 1/3 $ value of building Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes •i)cign, ,RcvcY:lioar'd Yes (exterior improvements) No (inletior improvements) Yes Yes Yes q c: Value or valuation of building shall be as defined in the Uniform Building Code as adopted by reference by the City of I tuntington Beach. Valuation shall be the cumulative valuation of building improvements. Determination of conceptual development s scenarios may be modified pending staff review of architectural/structural drawings of proposed development. 0 0 t, Admi % Lltt ) J MARCH 1948 6 $ OLIVE 115 2 24'23°1805. 22 21 •17 A16 15 X14 WALIWT TRACT COAST 25 a 1.5 19 . Its;23 117.50 to 7 _BLK.t}2 P.M. 32-41101 ° PAIR 19` nJA .2 0 h6 5 3 • 14 13 .14 12 11 ALLEY 250.56 10' 9M 20 b 11730' . PROJECT 939-50-190-231 LOT161 0.90 AC. NO. 12936*. M 75' HUNT I NG TON BEACH TRACT NO. 12238 TRACT NO. 12936 PARCEL MAP Its, 111.50' 117.50' 140 13 12 Is if AL Y AC.x 285-5 Q 75•ti 03 !0 a' ea 25' 25' a - - 11730' N7 tPRWcr9 -17 25 • 26 • R 30 t 27 21 511.50' 5 II . 147.50' 1t5' Its, n saaz' 50' 25' 2s'5 4 50.02' P.A PROJ. B L ,1 f P.N. 939-50 f 45-64PAR - •PAR 1PAR19 18 17 16 13 ' - X 10 0.187 =120. 294-50 25' 29' 25.01' M.M. 03-36- M.M. 569-165 17 M.M. 582-40541 P.M. 118-18. 28550. 294-50 75' L 117 a .j5' 0730- --n. LA -.(-- 25 a v10 v. 23-17 .19 2 1gs0' a 2 1n73p 15 ' TRACT .5 20!.04' 23 PftG EC7 939-5 0-081-185 Lor 13 } 188 AC 4 0. NO. 12238 n .n 13 24g,Ie. m 12 W 18 -' a 17 0' p J 75• 4 75' b 5825 h&K4•, m' 157,50• 117 13 *1 14 12 6 7 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK & PARCEL NUMBERS SHOWN IN CIRCLES II e I5 b 20' W • 6 20; AVEMLE' 1 Q 15' 0 21 23 19 Ia• 0 10 n7.50' 0' 7. 8 7 15 22 1 =3 18 2 1 17 .4 3 A VEAL 1 A .5 L. 6 5 4 31 It . 1 . 12s' A I I• U!^l 25' 501 0'1 'I I ,1 n • . L ,t5 ASSESSOR'S MAP' BOOK 024 PAGE 03 COUNTY OF ORANO (,If r 9'15/2004 2 49 36 PM 4 0 1. 1102 PCH N Ift W E S City of Huntington Beach Scale = 40' s Ft 14 .If Location Map