The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutInitial Plan IPZR2003027 - Supporting Documents.08 lbr 5a zol ZS' z S141 I4,--7WIlh 02 151 I fi. 10' z :- I Ik 0'•(Sf( 14 .OL ar CA 'D 4 -6 'D is-r . Iot o t t 11 + s l 35 6o 2 v Id ,0 .06 .0? 05 -01 ZS 4 z s 2S°-Vr®4° id,;/g§-5z -n Z.o-3.° or 1501 ZDZ, 3 '01 e ,4 ,o#%-}o 6"Zz- U r 4r 3 5 o' D Ioe_ (o S. Oa l 5 /?,00 cam. Is Z5o /Jo 51#4 6; Co J f25o .'r• 2rxd=t¢sspx =4 á DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH PARKING MASTER PLAN UPDATE September 27, 2000 Prepared for: THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Prepared by: KAKU ASSOCIATES, INC. 1453 Third Street, Suite 400 Santa Monica, California 90401 (310) 458-9916 Ref: 1224 AP TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Study Scope ................................................................................................... 1 Study Area Boundaries ..................................................................................... 1 Data Collection Program .................................................................................. 3 11 Parking Inventory ......................................................................................... . . 4 On-Street Parking Spaces ........................................................................ .. 4 Off-Street Parking Facilities ................... ............................ .......... ........ 4 Ill. Parking Utilization ........................................................................................................ 10 Weekday Parking Utilization Surveys ............................................................... 10 Saturday Parking Utilization Survey .............................................................. 17 IV. Parking User Survey ............ .................................................................................. 23 User Survey ..................................................................................................... 23 User Survey Results - Friday ........................................................................... 25 User Survey Results - Saturday ........................................................................ 26 Comparison of Friday and Saturday Results ..................................................... 26 V. Parking Duration ........................ .............................................................................. 30 VI. Analysis of Parking Demand ... .................................................................................. 33 Peaking Characteristics .................................................................................. 33 Development of Methodology ............................................................................ 38 Parking Generation Rates ........................................................................ ...... 38 Analysis of Existing Parking Demand ................................................................ 47 Issues .............................................................................................................. 53 VII Future Parking Demand ........................................................................................... 55 Forecasting Methodology ..... ........................................................................ 55 Future Land Forecasts .................................................................................. 55 Peak Parking Demand ...................................................................................... 56 Analysis of Future Parking Demand .................................................................. 60 VIII. Strategies for Downtown ............................................................................................... 65 Analysis of Potential Parking Needs .................................................................. 65 Evaluation of General Strategies ...................................................................... 70 Analysis of Potential Future Parking Scenarios ............................................ 72 IX. Recommended Parking Master Plan .............................................................................. 74 Strategy 1: Modified Parking Code Requirements ............................................. 74 Strategy 2: On-Site Parking ................................................................................ 74 Strategy 3: Parking Management Techniques ................................................... 74 Strategy 4: Use of Supplemental Supply of Parking ......................................... 75 Appendix A - Existing and Proposed Development Appendix B - Parking Survey LIST OF FIGURES NO. 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................2 2 Inventory of On-Street Parking Spaces .........................................................................7 3 Inventory of Off-Street Parking Spaces .........................................................................9 4 Results of Utilization Survey - All Spaces (Friday) .........................................................13 5 Results of Utilization Survey - All Spaces (Saturday) ....................................................19 6 Location of User Surveys ............................................................................................24 7 Location of Duration Surveys ....................................................................................31 8 Variation in Monthly Parking Utilization of City Structures ............................................34 9 Base Parking Utilization Under Peak Summer Conditions (Friday) ........................... .36 10 Base Parking Utilization Under Peak Summer Conditions (Saturday) .........................37 11 Hourly Variation of Parking Demand by Land Use (Friday) .....................................40 12 Summary of Utilization Survey (Friday) ....................................................................41 13 Hourly Variation of Parking Demand by Land Use (Saturday) ...................................43 14 Summary of Utilization Survey (Saturday) ...................................................................44 15 Existing Parking Demand Under Peak Summer Conditions (Friday) ...........................51 16 Existing Parking Demand Under Peak Summer Conditions (Saturday) .......................52 17 H l V i ti f P ki D P t f P k Dd douryaraon o ar ng eman ercenage oas ea eman (Friday) .............................................................................................................. 58 18 Future Parking Demand Under Peak Summer Conditions (Friday) .............................. 59 19 Hourly Variation of Parking Demand as Percentage of Peak Demand (Saturday.) .........................................................................................................62 20 Future Parking Demand Under Peak Summer Conditions (Saturday) .........................63 21 Future Parking Supply ................................................................................................64 22 Projected Parking Demand for Potential Block A Development ..................................67 LIST OF TABLES NO. 1 Parking Space Inventory ...............................................................................................5 2 Inventory of On-Street Parking Spaces ........................................................................6 3 Summary of Parking Utilization - Base Conditions (Friday) ..........................................11 4 Summary of Parking Utilization - On-Street Spaces (Friday) ....................... ............15 5 Summary of Parking Utilization - Off-Street Spaces (Friday) ......................................16 6 Summary of Parking Utilization - Base Conditions (Saturday) ...................................18 7 Summary of Parking Utilization - On-Street Spaces (Saturday) ...................................21 8 Summary of Parking Utilization - Off-Street Spaces (Saturday) ..................................22 9 Summary Results of User Survey (Friday) ........................................................... ...27 10 Summary Results of User Survey (Saturday) ...................................................... ...28 11 Results of Parking Duration Survey .............................................................................32 12 Land Use Inventory in Downtown Parking Master Plan Area - Base Conditions ................................................................................................ 46 13 Parking Demand Ratios by Land Use Type Derived from Surveys .............................. 48 14 Land Use Inventory in Downtown Parking Master Plan Area - Existing Conditions ...........................................................................................50 15 Analysis of Existing Conditions - Peak Parking Demand ...............................................54 16 Proposed Parking Ratios for Downtown Huntington Beach .........................................54 17 Land Use Forecasts for Downtown Parking Master Plan Area - Buildout Conditions .........................................................................................57 18 Results of Analysis of Future Parking Demand ...................................................... ...61 19 Parking Demand by Month as Percentage of Peak Demand ................................. ...69 20 Results of Analysis of Monthly Parking Demand .........................................................69 21 Parking Demand by Day of Week as Percentage of Friday .........................................69 22 Results of Analysis of Parking Scenarios .....................................................................73 23 Proposed Parking Ratios for Downtown Huntington Beach .........................................75 DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH PARKING MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The analysis of existing parking conditions in the Downtown study area indicates that the current supply of parking is adequate to accommodate current demand. The analysis indicates that overall the study area has sufficient excess capacity to accommodate increases in parking demand up to 513 spaces under peak summer conditions. ANALYSIS OF FUTURE CONDITIONS The analysis of future parking demand in the downtown area has indicated that a potential deficiency would exist in the study area with buildout of the master land use plan. At closer inspection, the results indicate that the deficiency in Area 1 (south of Orange Ave.) could be as high as 130 spaces with a surplus of 115 spaces in Area 2 (north of Orange Ave.) A review of these future conditions reveals the following: • Although it appears that the localized deficiency in Area 1 may be as high as 130 spaces, the size of the downtown area is such that most of the parking supply located in Area 2 can conveniently serve the needs of Area 1. Therefore, the local needs are not as relevant as the overall study area needs in the identification of the future requirements for downtown. • The analysis of future parking conditions assumes that other than the potential development on Block A, no additional parking supply would be provided by any of the new projects in the area. Although the specific nature of these projects is not known at this time, the total future density of development projected for the area in the buildout scenario over and above that projected for Block A is about 73,000 square feet of commercial development. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The recommended parking improvement program for the Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Master Plan includes the following four strategies: Strate 1: Modified Parkin Code Re uirements It is recommended that the City Parking Code Requirements for the Downtown Parking Master Plan be modified from the current requirements to the proposed rates. As indicated in Table 23 on page 75, it is recommended that the same rate be used for both Areas I and 2. The table indicates the current rates including separate rates for the two areas under existing conditions. It is also recommended that the provision that allows applicants to pay an in-lieu fee be maintained. This allows the City to maintain its flexibility in addressing each individual applicant's requests. i Strate 2: On-Site Parkin It is recommended that the city encourage all future projects proposing a density of development for a commercial project that is over 30,000 square feet to provide and satisfy at least 50% of its city code-required parking requirement. It is estimated that requiring these projects to develop 50% of the spaces would add a total of 100 to 150 spaces to the study area's inventory. If this policy were successfully implemented throughout the study area, the majority of the implied parking deficiency under buildout conditions could be addressed with existing and future supply. Strate 3: Parkin Mana ement Techni ues It is recommended that the City require larger projects in the area, such as the potential development on Block A, to utilize on-site attendants during the peak season. The use of these attendants would allow the parking managers to provide valet service to patrons and other users of the system and allow for the use of tandem parking in the facilities. By parking vehicles in tandem and using the aisles, the effective capacity of the parking supply of these larger facilities can be increased. This measure is only required during the peak summer months, i.e., June through August, and would help address the implied parking deficiency that is projected in the study area at buildout. Strate 4: Use of Su lemental Su I of Parkin It is recommended that the City of Huntington Beach not engage in a capital improvement program to construct additional parking facilities to add to the supply of parking. A review of the current parking inventory in the periphery area of downtown, Blocks 131 to F2, and the beach parking south of Pacific Coast Highway indicates that there are hundreds of existing parking spaces in the area that are unoccupied during the peak nighttime periods. The results of the utilization surveys and observations made during these surveys indicates that there over 300 unoccupied parking spaces within a 2 to 3 block radius of the downtown area. Although these spaces cannot be include in the official inventory of parking for the Downtown Parking Master Plan Area, they can be viewed as supplemental spaces that are available for use during key critical periods. During the nighttime peak, even in the summer months, many of these spaces are available and can accommodate the excess demand that is projected to occur at buildout. The fact that these projected deficiencies only occur for about 35 days of the year is not adequate justification to engage in a building program to add new parking facilities to the parking supply. ii I. INTRODUCTION The City of Huntington Beach proposes to update its downtown parking master plan that was adopted by the City Council in 1995. The plan was prepared with shared parking concepts in the downtown area, especially at night and on weekends. In August 1999, the City of Huntington Beach contracted with Kaku Associates, Inc. to conduct a study to analyze current parking conditions in the downtown area and to prepare recommendations toward the update of the parking master plan for the area. This report documents the results of this analysis and includes the study background, existing conditions, future conditions, issues which must be addressed, and a recommended parking improvement program for the City. The Huntington Beach Downtown Parking Master Plan has a maximum development threshold for uses to ensure the proper mix of uses and the proper function of the shared parking concept. The maximum threshold is 500,000 sq. ft. with a commercial/retail threshold of 250,000 sq. ft., an office threshold of 100,000 sq. ft., a restaurant threshold of 100,000 sq. ft. and a miscellaneous threshold of 50,000 sq. ft. The 500,000 sq. ft. of development activity in the DPMP shares the total inventory of parking spaces. STUDY SCOPE The scope for this study, which was developed in conjunction with the City of Huntington Beach, assumed that performance of the study would be separated into following eight tasks: ®Task 1 - Initiate Project and Review Data ®Task 2 - Document Existing Parking Supply ®Task 3 - Establish Existing Parking Demand ®Task 4 - Assess Current Parking Conditions ®Task 5 - Project Future Demand ®Task 6 - Identify And Review Alternative Strategies •Task 7 - Evaluation of Alternatives ®Task 8 - Recommended Parking Management Plan STUDY AREA BOUNDARIES The Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Master Plan study area has been defined as the area generally bounded by 1st Street on the east, 6th Street on the west, Pacific Coast Highway on the south, and Acacia Avenue on the north. The study area includes the entire downtown area along Main Street but does not include the beach area or the beach parking facilities. Figure 1 illustrates the study area boundary as defined above. 1 (:\r `/ 00 /PJ5 QGP A zANUL AV - - i LEGEND: - Downtown Parking Master Plan Boundary - Study Area Boundary 0 - Area 1 n -Area 3 (Periphery) -Area 2 A OLIVE AV - Block Identification FIGURE 1 STUDY AREA 2 I I I I • • • • - G1 (ON-STREET) I 1 F2 0 NOT 70 SGIE KAKU ASSOCIATES DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM The assessment of existing parking conditions includes several activities directed at the development of a comprehensive and detailed data base for the parking system in the downtown area of Huntington Beach (henceforth referred to as "Downtown"). The necessary elements of this data collection effort include Task 2 Document Existing Parking Supply, the inventory of all public and those privately-owned spaces that are available to the general public, residents and business employees and customers within the study area, and Task 3 Establish Existing Parking Demand and Task 4 Assess Current Parking Conditions, a parking utilization survey by time of day for these spaces, a duration survey for users of these spaces, and a direct survey of users in the Downtown area. As illustrated in Figure 1, the study area has been sub-divided into 3 Areas: 1, 2, and 3. Areas 1 and 2 constitute the actual area for the Downtown Parking Master Plan. Area 3, the periphery area, represents the area outside the parking master plan area but within the study area. These three areas were further subdivided into 16 subareas, which are referred to as Blocks, to assist with the presentation and analysis of the parking data. The specific components of the analysis described above include: • Parking space inventory of the entire study area • Parking utilization survey of all spaces • Parking user survey for a sample of parking facilities • Parking duration survey for a sample of parking facilities The results of the parking data collection effort are summarized in the following chapters. The parking inventory is summarized in Chapter II, the results of the parking utilization surveys in Chapter III, the results of the survey of parking space users in Chapter IV, and the data summarizing duration and length of stay in parking spaces in Chapter V. Chapter VI provides a summary of the existing parking conditions in the study area. 3 II. PARKING INVENTORY An inventory of all the available parking for public use was conducted for the entire downtown study area. The inventory included spaces in all publicly-owned facilities including on-street spaces and the city-owned off-street parking facilities, and the major privately-owned off-street parking facilities that are available for use by the general public within Areas 1 and 2. The inventory included the on-street spaces in the periphery area. The inventory did not include off- street parking spaces reserved for residential use. The inventory identified the location, type and number of spaces in each of the off-street facilities that were inventoried, and the location and applicable restriction for each of the on-street parking spaces located in the study area. The results of this effort, which are summarized in Table 1, indicate that there are a total of 2,189 spaces located within the study area. Of total, 679 are on-street spaces and the remaining 1,510 spaces are located in off-street facilities. Details of these spaces are described in the paragraphs below. ON-STREET PARKING SPACES The inventory of the available on-street parking spaces included the identification of any restrictions, such as metered parking spaces and time restricted spaces, as well as the number of spaces by location. The results of this effort, which are summarized in Table 2 for each block, indicate that of the total 679 on-street spaces located in the study area, 204 spaces are located in Area 1, 156 in Area 2, and 319 in the periphery. Of the total on-street spaces, 278 are un- metered and are available to potential users without any restrictions. Of the remaining 401 spaces, 345 are metered spaces, 54 are un-metered but with a 24-minute limit, and 2 are on- street spaces which are reserved for the handicapped. Of the metered spaces, 270 spaces are available at a rate of $1.50 per hour from 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. with a 2-hour limit. Of the remaining 75 spaces, 11 are available at a rate of $1.00 per hour from 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. with a 2 hour limit and 64 are available at a rate of $1.00 per hour from 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. with a 1 hour limit. As indicated in Figure 2, the restrictions on the use of these on-street spaces in the study area varies from block to block, side to side and area to area. OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES The inventory for off-street parking facilities was designed to identify parking supply available for public use as well as by employees in the study area. Off-Street parking spaces reserved for use by residents only that are unavailable to the general public are not included in this inventory nor are they addressed in this study. 4 TABLE 1 PARKING SPACE INVENTORY BLOCK PAZ ON-STREET OFF-STREET TOTAL A 60 176 236 B 32 285 317 C 34 20 54 D 36 826 862 E n/a n/a n/a F 42 60 102 AREA I TOTAL 204 1,367 1,571 G 59 44 103 H 75 78 153 I 22 21 43 AREA 2 TOTAL 156 143 299 AREA I & 2 SUBTOTAL 360 1,510 1,870 B1 20 0 20 C1 43 0 43 D1 39 0 39 D2 40 0 40 El 46 0 46 F1 42 0 42 F2 18 0 18 G1*71 0 71 PERIPHERY TOTAL 319 0 319 TOTAL AREA 679 1,510 2,189 G1 includes the following street segments (see Figure 1). 6th Street between Orange Avenue and Main Street - west side Main Street between 6th Street and Acacia Avenue - west side Acacia Avenue between Main Streeet and Lake Street - north side Lake Street between Acacia Avenue and Orange Avenue - east side Orange Avenue between 3rd Street and 1st Street - north side 5 TABLE 2 INVENTORY OF ON-STREET PARKING SPACES Meter S aces 6am-12am BLOCK (PAZ) 2 Hour 1 Hour $1.50/Hour $1.00/Hour $1.00/Hour Total 24 minute No Restriction Handicap Total Spaces A 28 7 12 47 4 9 0 60 B 16 0 10 26 6 0 0 32 C 16 0 13 29 5 0 0 34 D 11 0 17 28 8 0 0 36 E n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a F 13 4 12 29 9 4 0 42 AREA 1 TOTAL 84 11 64 159 32 13 0 204 G 0 0 0 0 17 40 2 59 H 0 0 0 0 2 73 0 75 1 0 0 0 0 2 20 0 22 AREA 2 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 21 133 2 156 AREA 1 & 2 SUBTOTAL 84 11 64 159 53 146 2 360 B1 20 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 C1 17 0 0 17 0 26 0 43 01 38 0 0 38 1 0 0 39 D2 40 0 0 40 0 0 0 40 El 18 0 0 18 0 28 0 46 F1 35 0 0 35 0 7 0 42 F2 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 G1•0 0 0 0 0 71 0 71 PERIPHERY TOTAL 186 0 0 186 1 132 0 319 TOTAL AREA 270 11 64 345 54 278 2 679 G1 includes the following street segments (see Figure 1): 6th Street between Orange Avenue and Main Street - west side Main Street between 6th Street and Acacia Avenue - west side Acacia Avenue between Main Streeet and Lake Street - north side Lake Street between Acacia Avenue and Orange Avenue - east side Orange Avenue between 3rd Street and 1st Street - north side 6 3j B A G AV 44 1G ' 7 ixt"rn s J 2Y s 2 WALNUT A 7 LEGEND: Master Plan BoundaryDowntown Pge #H - Handicap®- Meter Space: .SWhrl #Y -Yegow Loading Zone®• Meter Space: 2hr, $1.00/hr #W - White Passenger ZoneQ- Meter Space: lhr, $1.00/hr #P - Reserved Police#G - 24 Minutes # - No Restddion 101 D2 LC I- NOT TO SCALE 4 3 1a F2 KAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 2 INVENTORY OF ON-STREET PARKING SPACES 7 As illustrated in Figure 3, two of the facilities in Area 1 are city-owned facilities. The remainder is privately-owned. Three of the facilities charge a rate for the use of their spaces; the others do not. The inventory of off-street spaces in the Periphery area was not included in the inventory. A detailed inventory of the off-street spaces is available and included in the appendix. Table A in the appendix summarizes the results of the off-street parking facility inventory for each block within the study area. The data describes each specific parking facility in the study area and includes its general locations (i.e., in Area 1 or Area 2), its specific location (e.g., address), the block in which it is located, the user type (i.e., employee, customer, tenant, etc.), any restrictions on its use, the rates charged, and the number of spaces. 8 PG\C \/ A, PJ t 2 I JUNANUL AV LEGEND: Downtown Parldng Master Plan Boundary Oft-Street Parking Lot-Privately Owned - Off-Street Parking Lot-City Owned 0 NOT TO SME KAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 3 INVENTORY OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES 9 1 F2 to 1 z D 2 N I I III. PARKING UTILIZATION In order to analyze the characteristics of the pattern of usage of existing parking spaces within the study area, it was necessary to conduct a detailed parking utilization survey. This survey was conducted by determining the occupancy of each space within the study area on an hourly basis. This data was collected on a typical weekday, Friday September 24, 1999 and on a Saturday during the summer months on September 11, 1999. The data collected from these surveys were used to determine the peak parking demand for each facility, each parking analysis block and for the entire study area for both weekdays and Saturdays during the summer months. It is recognized that both survey dates occurred after the Labor Day weekend and do not, therefore, represent peak summertime conditions in the downtown Huntington Beach area. In order to ensure that peak parking demand estimates are used to conduct the analysis, historical data describing the seasonal variation in the level of activity in the downtown area was used to make the necessary adjustments. The methodology used to develop the adjustment factor, which is described in Chapter VI, Analysis of Parking Demand, is an acceptable technique used to illustrate and verify the impact of seasonal variation in parking demand. FRIDAY PARKING UTILIZATION The parking utilization survey conducted as part of this study consisted of an hour by hour count of the number of occupied parking spaces in each off-street facility and each on-street space within the study area. The weekday survey was conducted between 9 a.m. and 1 a.m., a 16 hour period that addresses the morning peak period, the midday, the evening peak period, and the nighttime period on Friday September 24, 1999. Total Parkin Utilization The results of the weekday parking utilization surveys, which are summarized in Table 3, indicate that the peak parking demand for the entire study area occurs between 9:00 and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays when a total of 1,273 spaces were occupied, which represents 58% utilization of the surveyed parking spaces. The peak utilization for each block indicates that several of the blocks have levels of usage that are much higher than the 58% for the study area during this peak period. The results indicate that highest concentration of parking demand occurred in the following Parking Analysis Zones (PAZ) during the peak period: •PAZ I 77% occupancy •PAZ C1 91% •PAZ El 87% 10 1 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF PARKING UTILIZATION BASE CONDITIONS - FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 PARKING PEAK UTILIZATION # Occup. AREA SUPPLY Spaces % Occup.PEAK PERIOD Area 1 1,571 ALL SPACES 936 60%9-10 .m. Area 2 299 177 59%3-4 .m. Peri he 319 212 66%10-11 .m. TOTAL 2,189 1,273 58%9-10 .m. Area 1 204 ON-STREET 151 74%10-11 .m. Area 2 156 104 67%3-4 .m. Peri he 319 212 66%10-11 .m. TOTAL 679 441 65%10-11 .m. Area 1 1,367 OFF-STREET 790 58%9 - 10 .m. Area 2 143 76 53%4-5 .m. Peri he na na na na TOTAL 1,510 845 56%8-9 m. 11 The following issues were noted from the results of the weekday parking utilization survey: • Although the utilization of PAZ C is only 56% between 9 and 10 p.m., the data indicates that its utilization was over 70% between 12 noon and 2 p.m and between 4 and 8 p.m. • Although the utilization of PAZ G is only 30% between 9 and 10 p.m., the data indicates that its utilization was over 70% between 12 noon and 6 p.m. •The utilization of PAZ I was over 70% from 6 to 10 p.m. • The utilization of PAZ C1 was over 70% from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. with utilization figures of 100% from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m. • The utilization of PAZ El was over 70% from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. with utilization of 98% from 5 to 6 p.m. The results of the surveys also indicate that: • 936 of the 1,571 spaces, 60%, in Area 1 are occupied between 9 and 10 p.m. • 129 of the 299 spaces, 43%, in Area 2 are occupied between 9 and 10 p.m • The peak utilization in Area 2 occurs at 3 p.m. when 177 of the 299 spaces, 59%, are occupied • The peak utilization in the Periphery occurs at 10 p.m. when 212 of the 319 spaces, 66%, are occupied The results of the utilization survey are also illustrated in graphic format in Figure 4. The bar graph illustrates the hourly parking demand by type of space (i.e., on-street versus off-street) by time of day for the entire study area. It can be seen that on weekdays, the parking demand is relatively low in the morning (600 occupied parking spaces at 9 a.m.), increases until 3:00 p.m. when the midday peak parking demand occurs (1,141 occupied spaces), decreases slightly until the evening when the demand increases to the nighttime and daily peak at 9:00 p.m. with 1,273 occupied spaces, and then decreases for the remainder of the survey period. The detailed summary of the results of the weekday utilization surveys is provided in the appendix in Table B. The table presents the actual number of occupied spaces and corresponding percent utilization for each type of parking space (i.e., on-street, public off-street, or private off-street) by time of day for the entire study area. 12 FIGURE 4 RESULTS OF UTILIZATION SURVEY - ALL SPACES FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24,1999 c.) 2,400 2,200 Total supply = 2,189 spaces .................................................................................................................................................... 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1 000 1,273 , 800 845 600 400 200 0 441 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY M ON-STREET M OFF-STREET TOTAL On-Street Parkin Utilization The parking utilization survey results for on-street spaces were analyzed separately to provide a more detailed assessment of their current use and the potential availability of unused on-street parking spaces. Table 4 has been prepared to summarize the results of the utilization survey of on-street parking spaces during the 16 hour period of the survey from 9 a.m. to 1 a.m. As indicated in the table, the period of peak occupancy of on-street parking spaces occurs between 10:00 and 11:00 p.m. when 441 parking spaces, 65%, are occupied. The results indicate that the occupancy of the blocks varies from a low of 33% occupancy in Block F2 to a high of 96% in Block El. Both blocks are located in the periphery. In Area 1, the utilization during the peak period varies from 50% in B!ock F to 88% in Block A. In Area 2, the variation is 42% in Block G to 64% in Block I. The following issues were noted from the results of the Friday parking utilization survey of on- street spaces. • Although the utilization of Parking Analysis Zone (PAZ) C is only 74% between 10 and 11 p.m., the data indicates that its utilization was over 90% between 1 and 2 p.m. and between 4 and 7 p.m. • Although the utilization of PAZ G is only 42% between 10 and 11 p.m., the data indicates that its utilization was over 90% between 2 and 4 p.m. and between 5 and 6 p.m. • The utilization of PAZ C1 was over 100% from 1 to 7 p.m. • The utilization of PAZ El was over 80% from 2 to 11 p.m. Table C in the Appendix provides a detailed summary of the utilization of on-street spaces on a block by block basis for each hour of the survey. Off-Street Parkin Utilization Table 5 provides a summary assessment of the utilization of the off-street parking spaces between 9 a.m. and 1 a.m. within the downtown study area. The results indicate that 843 of the 1,510 off-street parking spaces, or 56%, are occupied during the weekday peak. This level of usage occurs in these off-street spaces from 8 p.m. until 11 p.m. on a weekday. With a few exceptions, the utilization of off-street parking is relatively low, i.e., at or below 70%, in each of the Parking Analysis Zones during the entire period of the surveys. The exceptions are: 14 TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF PARKING UTILIZATION - ON-STREET SPACES FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24,1999 AREA 1 AREA 2 PERIPHERY TOTAL Available Available Available Available Time of Da Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ. 9:00 AM 204 79 39%156 45 29%319 104 33%679 228 34% 10:00 AM 204 107 52%156 64 41%319 139 44%679 310 46% 11:00 AM 204 129 63%156 74 47%319 137 43%679 310 46% 12:00 PM 204 139 68%156 77 49%319 155 49%679 371 55% 1:00 PM 173 120 69%156 88 56%319 172 54%648 380 59% 2:00 PM 173 119 69%156 103 66%319 176 55%648 398 61% 3:00 PM 173 126 73%156 103 66%319 182 57%648 398 61% 4:00 PM 173 128 74%156 95 61%319 190 60%648 413 64% 5:00 PM 173 120 69%156 98 63%319 192 60%648 410 63% 6:00 PM 173 112 65%156 90 58%319 193 61%648 395 61% 7:00 PM 184 135 73%156 74 47%319 184 58%659 393 60% 8:00 PM 204 130 64%156 79 51%319 201 63%679 410 60% 9:00 PM 204 146 72%156 79 51%319 208 65%679 430 63% 10:00 PM 204 151 74%156 79 51%319 212 66%679 441 65% 11:00 PM 204 128 63%156 78 50%319 190 60%679 379 56% 12:00 AM 204 120 59%156 61 39%319 189 59%679 378 56% TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF PARKING UTILIZATION - OFF-STREET SPACES FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 AREA 1 AREA 2 TOTAL Available Available Available Time of Da Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ. 9.00 AM 1,367 341 25%143 36 25%1,510 377 25% 10:00 AM 1,367 382 28%143 46 32%1,510 428 28% 11:00 AM 1,367 443 32%143 49 34%1,510 492 33% 12:00 PM 1,367 553 40%143 49 34%1,510 602 40% 1:00 PM 1,367 613 45%143 58 41%1,510 671 44% 2:00 PM 1,367 642 47%143 66 46%1,510 708 47% 3 00 PM 1,367 656 48%143 73 51%1,510 729 48% 4:00 PM 1,367 606 44%143 76 53%1,510 682 45% 5:00 PM 1,367 609 45%143 70 49%1,510 679 45% 6.00 PM 1,367 653 48%143 69 48%1,510 722 48% 7:00 PM 1,367 690 50%143 58 41%1,510 748 50% 8.00 PM 1,367 781 57%143 64 45%1,510 845 56% 9:00 PM 1,367 790 58%143 53 37%1,510 843 56% 10:00 PM 1,367 765 56%143 45 31%1,510 810 54% 11:00 PM 1,367 560 41%143 29 20%1,510 589 39% 12:00 AM 1,367 410 30%143 29 20%1,510 439 29% 16 • The utilization of Parking Analysis Zone (PAZ) A is 73% between 2 and 3 p.m. • The utilization of PAZ I is over 70% from 7 to 11 p.m. with a high of 100% between 9 and 10 p.m. A detailed summary of the utilization of the public off-street spaces can be found in Table D of the appendix. This table illustrates the parking utilization for each facility in each block for each hour of the survey. SATURDAY PARKING UTILIZATION The Saturday survey was conducted between 9 a.m. and 11 p.m., a 14 hour period that addresses the midday, the evening, and the nighttime periods. Total Parkin Utilization The summary of the results of the Saturday utilization surveys, which were conducted on September 11, 1999, are presented in Table 6. The results indicate that the peak parking demand for the entire study area occurs between 3:00 and 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays when a total of 1,265 spaces were occupied, which represents 58% utilization of the surveyed parking spaces. The peak utilization for each block indicates that several of the blocks have utilizations which are much higher than the 58% for the study area with some over 85%. The results in Table 6 also indicate the following: • 902 of the 1,571 spaces in Area 1, or 57%, are occupied between 9 and 10 p.m. •188 of the 299 spaces in Area 2, or 63%, are occupied between 3 and 4 p.m. • The peak occurs at 2 p.m. in the periphery area when 232 of the 319 spaces, or 73%, are occupied. The results of the utilization survey are also illustrated in graphic format in Figure 5. The bar graph illustrates the hourly parking demand by type of space (i.e., on-street versus off-street) by time of day for the entire study area. It can be seen that on Saturdays, the parking demand is relatively low in the morning (less than 700 occupied parking spaces at 9 a.m.), increases until 3:00 p.m. when the peak parking demand occurs (1,265 occupied spaces), decreases slightly until the evening when the demand increases to the nighttime peak at 9:00 p.m. with 1,223 occupied spaces, or 55%. The results indicate that there a significant number of unoccupied spaces providing a large surplus of parking supply. 17 TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF PARKING UTILIZATION BASE CONDITIONS - SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1999 PARKING PEAK UTILIZATION # Occup. AREA SUPPLY Spaces ALL SPACES % Occup.PEAK PERIOD Area 1 1,571 902 57%9-10 .m. Area 2 299 188 63%3-4 .m. Peri he 319 232 73%2-3 .m. TOTAL 2,189 1,265 ON-STREET 58%3-4 .m. Area 1 204 173 85%4-5 .m. Area 2 156 109 70%3-4 .m. Peri he 319 232 73%2 -3 .m. TOTAL 679 508 OFF-STREET 75%3-4 .m. Area 1 1,367 791 58%10-11 .m. Area 2 143 79 55%5-6 .m. Peri he na na na na TOTAL 1,510 798 53%10-11 m. 18 FIGURE 5 RESULTS OF UTILIZATION SURVEY - ALL SPACES SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1999 tD 2,400 - 2,200 Total supply = 2,189 spaces ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,265 1,223 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 798 508 508 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY SON-STREET El OFF-STREET TOTAL Table E in the appendix provides a detailed summary of the utilization of all spaces on Saturday. On-Street Parkin Utilization The parking utilization survey results for on-street spaces were analyzed separately to provide a more detailed assessment of their current use and the potential availability of unused on-street parking spaces. Table 7 has been prepared to summarize the number of occupied spaces and the percent occupancy of each block during both the 14 hour period of the utilization survey, i.e., between 9 p.m. and 11 p.m., and for the peak period of occupancy for on-street spaces as a specific type of space. The results indicate the following: • 508 parking spaces, 75%, are occupied between 3 and 4 p.m. • The occupancy for the entire study area varies from a low of 48% occupancy in Block D2 to 102% in Block C1 during the 3 to 4 p.m. peak period. Both blocks are located in the periphery. • In Area 1 the occupancy varies from 69% in Block F to 88% in Blocks A and C. • In Area 2, the variation is 67% in Block H to 77% in Block I. Table F in the Appendix provides a detailed block by block analysis of on-street spaces for each hour of the survey. Off-Street Parkin Utilization Table 8 provides a summary assessment of the utilization of the off-street parking spaces between 9 a.m. and 11 p.m. within the downtown study area. The results indicate the following: • 757 of the 1,510 off-street parking spaces, or 50%, are occupied during the Saturday peak between 3 and 4 p.m. • The peak demand for off-street spaces actually occurs between 10 p.m. and 11 p.m. when 798 spaces, or 53%, are occupied. A detailed summary of the utilization of the public off-street spaces can be found in Table G of the appendix, which illustrates the parking utilization for each facility in each block for each hour of the survey. 20 TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF PARKING UTILIZATION - ON-STREET SPACES SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1999 AREA 1 AREA 2 PERIPHERY TOTAL Available Available Available Available Time of Da Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ. 9:00 AM 204 88 43%156 59 38%319 170 53%679 317 47% 10:00 AM 204 122 60%156 76 49%319 182 57%679 380 56% 11:00 AM 204 161 79%156 95 61%319 209 66%679 465 68% 12:00 PM 204 168 82%156 97 62%319 221 69%679 486 72% 1:00 PM 204 168 82%156 100 64%319 223 70%679 491 72% 2:00 PM 204 168 82%156 101 65%319 232 73%679 501 74% 3:00 PM 204 168 82%156 109 70%319 231 72%679 508 75% 4:00 PM 204 173 85%156 107 69%319 228 71%679 508 75% 5:00 PM 204 165 81%156 99 63%319 209 66%679 473 70% 6:00 PM 204 144 71%156 80 51%319 189 59%679 413 61% 7:00 PM 204 138 68%156 82 53%319 201 63%679 421 62%N 8:00 PM 204 150 74%156 80 51%319 207 65%679 437 64% 9:00 PM 204 152 75%156 71 46%319 215 67%679 . 438 65% 10:00 PM 204 120 59%156 79 51%319 207 65%679 406 60% TABLE 8 SUMMARY OF PARKING UTILIZATION - OFF-STREET SPACES SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1999 AREA 1 AREA 2 TOTAL Available Available Available Time of Da Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ.Su I Occu ied % Occ. 9:00 AM 1,367 333 24%143 31 22%1,510 364 24% 10:00 AM 1,367 388 28%143 46 32%1,510 434 29% 11:00 AM 1,367 504 37%143 45 31%1,510 549 36% 12:00 PM 1,367 571 42%143 55 38%1,510 626 41% 1:00 PM 1,367 617 45%143 67 47%1,510 684 45% 2:00 PM 1,367 654 48%143 68 48%1,510 722 48% 3:00 PM 1,367 678 50%143 79 55%1,510 757 50% 4:00 PM 1,367 665 49%143 76 53%1,510 741 49% 5:00 PM 1,367 613 45%143 79 55%1,510 692 46% 6:00 PM 1,367 653 48%143 75 52%1,510 728 48% 7:00 PM 1,367 638 47%143 61 43%1,510 699 46% 8:00 PM 1,367 694 51%143 50 35%1,510 744 49% 9:00 PM 1,367 750 55%143 35 24%1,510 785 52% 10:00 PM 1,367 761 56%143 37 26%1,510 798 53% 22 IV. PARKING USER SURVEY As part of the effort to better understand the parking characteristics and needs of the users of the downtown area parking supply, a survey was conducted among these users. Results of the user survey are important elements of the process used to identify needs, develop alternative strategies, and to evaluate the feasibility of proposed improvements to the parking system. USER SURVEY The parking user survey was conducted in Downtown Huntington Beach on September 11 and September 24, 1999. A random sample of employees, business patrons, visitors, tourists, shoppers, beach goers and other individuals were surveyed to obtain information on their behavior and attitudes. The user surveys were conducted in selected areas of the downtown area which are illustrated in Figure 6. These locations included on-street spaces on Main Street throughout the study area; on Walnut Avenue, Olive Avenue and Orange Avenue between 3rd Street and 5th Street; on 3rd Street and 5th Street north of PCH; portions of Lake Street and 6th Street north of Orange Avenue; and in the City Structure in Block D, and the parking lots in Blocks A and B. Surve Methodolo The survey was conducted by having surveyors place questionnaires on the windshields of each parked vehicle in each of the facilities identified above. The surveyors circulated throughout each parking facility every two hours from 9 a.m. until 12 a.m. on the Friday and between 9 a.m. and 11 p.m. on Saturday. The survey questionnaire was addressed with postage allowing respondents to mail the questionnaire back. It was determined that a more efficient method could be used at the city's parking structure on Walnut Avenue in Block D. At this facility, the surveyors stood at the entrance and handed survey questionnaires to the driver of all vehicles that entered the parking structure during the survey. The users would still be able to mail the questionnaires back to Kaku Associates by merely placing it in a mail box. Surve Questionnaire The questionnaire, a sample of which is illustrated in Figure A in the appendix, was designed to provide an indication of the relationship between the users of the parking spaces and the land uses that exist in the downtown area. Questions used to assess these relationships were directed at the following issues: 23 Gtr PGP d7 H-C (0 1 F2 U)0 orf zrte)N D 2 1 1 B LEGEND: GIs------ - Downtown Panting Master Plan Boundary - Location of User Survey NOT TO SCALE KAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 6 LOCATION OF USER SURVEYS 24 • Trip origin • Trip frequency • Trip purpose • Walking distance to destination • Auto occupancy • Whether parking was validated or not • Willingness to pay for parking Surve Results The returned questionnaires were analyzed separately for Friday and Saturdays. A total of 7,790 survey questionnaire forms were distributed on the two days of the survey. Of these, 397 were returned from the weekday survey and 414 from the Saturday survey for a total of 811 questionnaires, about a 10% return. A 10% response rate is normal for surveys of this type and serves to provide a useful and valid sample size from which appropriate decisions can be made. USER SURVEY RESULTS - FRIDAY The following summarizes the results of the weekday users survey. Trip Origin. The results indicate that the trip origin for a large majority of the respondents, 84% on weekdays, was their home. The next highest category was work at 11 % indicating that no more 5% come from other destinations. Hotels represented the origin for only 1% of the respondents. Tri Fre uenc . 65% of the respondents come to the study area at least once per week with 20% coming every day. The users that come every day and those that come 3 to 4 times per week are likely to be employees and represent over half of the respondents. Trip Purpose. The most common purposes for parking in one of the study area facilities are to patronize the Farmer's Market, other shopping, dining, or the beach pier. Users were asked to mark all purposes that apply so most had multiple responses. While recognizing that respondents had multiple responses, it is noted that 16% shopped in the area, 47% dined, and 17% visited the Huntington Beach Pier. The next highest trip purposes were movie/entertainment, visiting a business in the area, and employment in the area. Walkin Distance. The respondents walked an average of about 1.4 blocks from the location the vehicle was parked to the primary destination for the trip. Auto Occu anc . The average auto occupancy of the respondents was 1.8 persons per vehicle, a relatively high average. 25 Parking Rate. The respondents were also asked how much they would be willing to pay to park in the area. Of those who responded, 42% indicated that they felt there should be no charge for parking, 25% were willing to pay $0.50 per hour, and 30% would pay $1.00 per hour. Table 9 provides a summary of the results of the user survey for Friday. USER SURVEY RESULTS - SATURDAY The results of the Saturday user survey are summarized below. Trip Origin. The results indicate that a high percentage, 93%, responded that their trip origin was home. The second highest origin for trips to the study area was work at 2%. This indicates that less than 5% came from other destinations. Hotels represented the origin for only 1% of the respondents. Tri Fre uenc . A relatively high percentage of the Saturday respondents, 67%, come to the study area at least once per week with 19% coming every day. Trip Purpose. The three most common purposes for parking in one of the study area facilities are to shop, dine, or come to a movie/entertainment. Users were asked to mark all purposes that apply so most had multiple responses. Recognizing that most respondents had multiple purposes, 18% shopped in the area, 58% dined, and 19% came for a movie. Other purposes with high percentages of responses were beach, Huntington Beach Pier, and visiting a business. Auto Occu anc . The average auto occupancy of the Saturday respondent was 2.1 persons per vehicle, a relatively high average. Walkin Distance. The respondents had to walk an average distance of 1.6 blocks from the location they parked their vehicle to their destination. Parking Rate. The respondents were also asked how much they would be willing to pay to park in the area. Of those who responded, 38% indicated that they felt there should be no charge for parking, 23% were willing to pay $0.50 per hour, and 33% would pay $1.00 per hour. These are very similar to the weekday response. Table 10 summarizes Saturday survey results of the user survey. COMPARISON OF FRIDAY AND SATURDAY RESULTS The survey results from the two days have many similarities and some differences. Results from both days indicate that the origin for a large majority of the users was their home and about 40% visit downtown at least 3 or 4 days per week. Less than 10% of the users were employees in the 26 TABLE 9 SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF USER SURVEY FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 3. From where did you begin your trip to this area today? (2 No Response) 1 333 84% Home 4 0 1% Hotel 2 43 11% Work 5 11 3% Other (Describe) 3f 31 1% School 4. How often do you come to this area? (3 No Response) 1 100 25% 1-2 days per week 4 31 8% 1-3 times per month 2 78 20% 3-4 days per week 5 102 26% less than once a month 3 78 20% 5 or more days per week 6 51 1 % first time visitor 5. What was the primary purpose of your trip today? (mark all that apply) (2 No Response) 1 83 21% Farmer's Market 7 31 8% Live in downtown area 2 65 16% Shopping 8 50 13% Employed in downtown area 3 187 47% Eating/Drinking 9 16 4% Visiting area resident 4 48 12% Movie/Entertainment 10 78 20% Visiting area business 5 474 11% Beach 11 11 3% Other (Describe) 6 66 17% Huntington Beach Pier 158 multi-purpose trips out of 397 respones 6. How many blocks did you have to walk from your parking space to your primary destination?(6 No Response) Avera e: 1.4 Blocks 7. How many persons (including yourself) were in this vehicle when it was parked at this location?(8 No Response) Avera e: 1.8 ersons 8. Was your parking validated today?(9 No Response)1 141 9. How much are you willing to pay per hour to park in the downtown area? 1 2 3 163 96 1117 42% Nothing 25% less than $0.50 per hour 30% $0.50 to $1.00 per hour 4 12 5 0 16 11 36% Yes 2 247 3% $1.00 to $2.00 per hour 0% $2.00 to $3.00 per hour 0% over $3.00 per hour 64% No 27 TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF USER SURVEY SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1999 3. From where did you begin your trip to this area today? (2 No Response) 1 382 93% Home 4 1% Hotel 2 10 2% Work 5 12 3% Other (Describe) 3 21 0% School 4. How often do you come to this area? (3 No Response) 1 1 22 25% 1-2 days per week 4 46 11% 1-3 times per month 2 94 23% 3-4 days per week 5 78 19% less than once a month 3 86 19% 5 or more days per week 6 11 3% first time visitor 5. What was the primary purpose of your trip today? (mark all that apply) (2 No Response) 1 0 0% Farmer's Market 7 30 7% Live in downtown area 2 73 18% Shopping 8 29 7% Employed in downtown area 3 238 58% Eating/Drinking 9 22 5% Visiting area resident 4 77 19% Movie/Entertainment 10 77 19% Visiting area business 5 77 19% Beach 11 1% Other (Describe) 6 98 24% Huntington Beach Pier 197 multi-purpose trips out of 411 responses 6. How many blocks did you have to walk from your parking space to your primary destination? (13 No Response) Avera e: 1.6 Blocks 7. How many persons (including yourself) were in this vehicle when it was parked at this location? (8 No Response) Avera e: 2.1 ersons 8. Was your parking validated today? (10 No Response)1 41% Yes 1240 9. How much are you willing to pay per hour to park in the downtown area? (10 No Response) 2 1 154 38% Nothing 4 18 4%$1.00 to $2.00 per hour 2 94 23% less than $0.50 per hour 5 2]0%$2.00 to $3.00 per hour 31135 33% $0.50 to $1.00 per hour 6 0% over $3.00 per hour 28 area on both days. While the single most common purpose to come downtown on both days was to visit an eating/drinking establishment, the percentage was much higher on Saturday. The percentage that came to the area to go to the beach or to the pier was also higher on Saturday. The primary difference between the two days was'the lack of any visitors of the Farmer's Market on Saturday which only occurs on Friday. 29 V. PARKING DURATION A parking duration analysis was conducted for each of the types of parking facilities in the area, i.e., for on-street and off-street, for both Friday and Saturday. The surveys were conducted over a 12-hour period from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. in each parking area on both days. Parking duration data is particularly useful in assessing the types of users that park in the various types of parking spaces in the area. The parking duration survey for on-street spaces was conducted on the four blocks of Main Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Frankfort Avenue. These segments of Main Street are illustrated with shading in Figure 7. The survey was also conducted in the parking facility in Block A as illustrated in the figure. This specific facility was selected because it served as a good example of a facility that attracted a wide range of customers and employees. Table 11 summarizes the results of the duration survey conducted on these 4 blocks of Main Street and the one parking lot. The results indicate that the average length of stay for users of the on-street parking spaces varies from 56 minutes in Area 1 to 1 hour 17 minutes in Area 2 on Friday, and 56 minutes in Area 1 and 1 hour 10 minutes in Area 2 on Saturday. These results are contrasted with the average length of stay in the off-street parking lot for the two days of 2 hours 9 minutes for Friday and 1 hour 35 minutes on Saturday. The differences, which are more significant on Friday, is expected since many of the users are likely to be employees who have a much longer length of stay. It also vindicates the city's objective of achieving a higher turnover for the on-street spaces. This same situation can be seen with 60% of users of on-street spaces in Area 1 and 64% in Area 2 staying less than 1 hour on Friday. This compares with only 33% of those users in Lot A on 5th Street on Friday. On Saturday, the 57% of the users of on-street spaces in Area 1 and 60% of the users in Area 2 stay less than one hour. This compares with 35% in the off-street parking lot on Saturday. A closer inspection of the duration survey results from Friday indicates that 10% of the users of on-street spaces on Main Street between Orange Avenue and PCH and 18% of the users of spaces on Main Street between Orange Avenue and Frankfurt Avenue stay over 2 hours. Although these percentages are relatively low, it is an indication that 10 to 18% of the users are illegally parked in the on-street spaces. The survey results from Saturday are similar with 9% between Orange and PCH and 18% between Orange and Frankfurt. This rate of illegal parking among the users of the various on-street spaces is relatively low. Therefore, no apparent parking enforcement problem exists in the Downtown Huntington Beach study area. 30 I I I I Gar GPP P \/X 0 I I- LEGEND: W T AV ® ®-- - Downtown Parking Master Plan Boundary - Location of Duration Survey N D 2 B NOT TO SCALE KAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 7 LOCATION OF DURATION SURVEY 31 Ar I 1 F2 ' 0 AV I p 1 I ' TABLE 11 RESULTS OF PARKING DURATION SURVEY FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24,1999 Area 1 - Off-Street Area 1 - On-Street Area 2 - On-Street Time Lot Al 78 s aces - 5th St Main St - Oran e and PCH Main St - Frankfort and Oran e < 1 Hour 101 33%354 60%200 64% 1-2 Hours 91 29%175 30%55 18% 2-3 Hours 45 15%42 7%28 9% 3-4 Hours 18 6%17 3%14 4% 4-5 Hours 12 4%2 0%4 1% 5-6 Hours 12 4%1 0%1 0% 6 + Hours 30 10%1 0%12 4% Total 309 100%592 100%314 100% Avera e hr:min 2:09 0:56 1:17 SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1999 Area 1 - Off-Street Area 1 - On-Street Area 2 - On-Street Time Lot Al 78 s aces - 5th St Main St - Oran e and PCH Main St - Frankfort and Oran e < 1 Hour 130 35%350 57%156 60% 1-2 Hours 140 37%210 34%61 23% 2-3 Hours 56 15%42 7%26 10% 3-4 Hours 28 7%11 2%8 3% 4-5 Hours 5 1%3 0%3 1% 5-6 Hours 6 2%2 0%5 2% 6 + Hours 10 3%1 0%1 0% Total 375 100%619 100%260 100% Avera e hr:min 1:35 0:56 1:10 VI. ANALYSIS OF PARKING DEMAND The previous chapters presented an overview of the current conditions of the operation of the existing shared parking system in Downtown Huntington Beach during a summer Friday and Saturday. The overview includes a detailed description of the parking supply, a summary of the utilization of these spaces, an analysis of the users of the system based on a survey, and the results of a parking space duration survey. The data was used in conjunction with additional historical data associated with the shared parking system to develop an understanding of the parking demand and its relationship to the existing land uses in the study area. PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS Although every attempt was made to conduct the various parking surveys during the peak season of activity in Downtown Huntington Beach, it was determined that because of weather conditions and normal peaking characteristics in the area, the Saturday surveys in mid-September and the Friday surveys in September were conducted during a period when the level of activity had already receded. Therefore, it is likely that some of the results of the survey do not represent peak conditions in the study area. In an effort to assess the degree to which the survey results may need to be adjusted, it was determined that a review of the data summarizing the usage patterns of the city's parking structure (Main Street Promenade) located at 200 Main Street be used to develop a historical perspective of the seasonal variation in the activity levels in the downtown study area. Figure 8 illustrates the monthly usage of the city structure for 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 The graphs indicate that the parking demand in the downtown area of Huntington Beach reaches its peak during the period from early June until the first of September. During this 13 week period, the level of activity in Downtown Huntington Beach, and therefore the parking demand, is significantly higher than the remainder of the year. As illustrated in Figure 8, although the historical data indicates that the parking demand in mid- to late-September is relatively high, the results do not reflect peak conditions in Downtown Huntington Beach. Although the data from Figure 8 indicates that the parking utilization data collected for this study does not represent the peak parking conditions that can be generated in the study area, a further review of the September 1999 utilization survey results ensures that other characteristics and factors derived from this data appear to be accurate and usable in this analysis. Data from the survey can be appropriately used to determine the hourly variation in the parking utilization, the time of day when parking demand peaks, and the relative relationship between parking demand and land use type by time of day. It was determined, however, that it would be necessary to develop an adjustment factor for the parking utilization data is to be used to estimate peak parking demand. The value of the peak parking demand generated by users of the Downtown Huntington 33 FIGURE 8MONTHLY VARIATION IN USAGE OF CITY STRUCTURE1997/1998 -1998/1999120,000100,00080,00060,00040,000I20,0000000vm3 3C. a-m mMONTHC-C- > Cl)C C C CDco _0CD aCD3CD®1997/1998 1998/1999 Beach parking system is used to develop parking demand ratios that quantify the relationship between peak parking demand and land use. Ad"ustment Factor The parking demand within the city structure was analyzed to determine the appropriate relationship between the demand measured during the utilization surveys in September 1999 described above and the actual summertime peak that can normally be expected between June and August. Parking demand in the City structure during June, July and August 1998 and June, July and August 1999 was compared to the parking demand in the structure during September 1999 to estimate this relationship. Several factors were developed that quantified the relationship between the peak parking demand from the September 1999 data and peak parking demand for other time periods. These other time periods included the average of the six months between June 1998 through August 1998 and June 1999 and August 1999, the average of June 1998 through August 1998 only, the average of June 1999 through August 1999 only, the absolute peak demand during these six month period just described, the average of July 1998 and July 1999, the average of June 1998 and June 1999, and the average of August 1998 and August 1999. Based on a review of these various factors, it was determined that an adjustment factor based on the ratio between the average parking demand during the period 13 peak weekends in 1998 and the same 13 weekends in 1999 and the peak parking demand from September 1999 provided the most realistic and relevant relationship between the collected data and data which represented peak summer conditions in Downtown Huntington Beach. Using this data, the parking utilization figures from September 1999 should be adjusted by a factor of 1.32 for Friday and 1.24 for Saturday. Peak Summertime Parkin Demand The adjustment factors discussed above, i.e., 1.32 for Friday and 1.24 for Saturday, were used to prepare Figure 9, the Base Parking Utilization Under Summer Conditions on Fridays on an hourly basis for the study area. The figure illustrates the hourly parking demand for Area 1 and Area 2 for a typical Friday that has been adjusted to reflect conditions during the peak summer months The figure indicates that the peak parking demand on a Friday during the summer is estimated to be 1,406 spaces which represents 75% of the total available supply of 1,870 spaces. This is based on a peak usage of 1,236 occupied spaces out of an available supply of 1,571 spaces in Area 1 and 170 occupied spaces out of an available supply of 299 spaces in Area 2. It should be noted that the data in Figure 9 does not include the parking demand or supply in the periphery area, i.e., in Blocks B1 to G1. Figure 10, which illustrates similar information for a Saturday during the summer months, indicates that the peak parking demand is estimated to be 1,282 spaces, which represents 69% of the total supply within the study area. This is based on a peak usage of 1,049 occupied spaces out of an available supply of 1,571 spaces in Area 1 and 233 occupied spaces out of an available supply of 299 spaces in Area 2. 35 FIGURE 9 BASE PARKING UTILIZATION UNDER PEAK SUMMER CONDITIONS FRIDAY wJ 2,400 2,200 2,000 Area 1 & 2 Supply = 1,870 spaces 1,800 1,600 1,406 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY 800 600 400 200 0 AREA 1 ®AREA 2 FIGURE 10 BASE PARKING UTILIZATION UNDER PEAK SUMMER CONDITIONS SATURDAY 2,400 2,200 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Area 1 & 2 Supply = 1,870 spaces ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . 1,282 9 to 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY AREA 1 ®AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT OF METHODOLOGY A key element of the Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Study is the development of parking generation rates as exhibited by the existing land uses in the study area. To conduct this analysis, it was necessary to implement a process that includes the following steps: • Ste I - Anal ze Results of User Surve - Each of the users of parking spaces in the downtown area was placed into one of several land use categories. These categories were based on the primary purpose of the trip that generated the need to park the vehicle as indicated by the user. The inter-relationship between the various land uses was determined for multi-purpose trips and used to estimate the adjustment made in calculating the parking demand for each land use type. • Ste 2 - Determine Peak Parkin Demand b Land Use Cate o - The parking demand by each land use category was estimated for each hour of the day. The data was used to determine the total parking demand that was generated for the study by time of day. • Ste 3 - Estimate Parkin Demand Rates - The inventory of square footages for each of the existing land uses was obtained from the city staff and used in conjunction with the parking demands for each land use group to estimate the parking demand rates for each land use category by time of day. This calculation of parking demand by land use divided by total square footage for each land use type resulted in an empirically developed parking demand rate for the DPMP area. • Ste 4 - Determine Peak Parkin Generation Rates - The hourly parking demand rates developed using Step 3 were analyzed to identify the peak parking generation rates for each land use category. • Ste 5 - Corn are to T ical Standards - The rates developed from the survey data were compared to the existing City Code Requirements. Appropriate adjustments were made prior to the development of a recommended set of rates for the Downtown Huntington Beach Shared Parking System. PARKING GENERATION RATES The following summarizes the results of the use of this process to develop parking generation rates for the various land uses in Downtown Huntington Beach. 38 Hourl Parkin Demand b User Grou /Land Use Cate o Steps 1 and 2 described above were used to develop an estimate of the hourly parking demand by land use type based on the user categories identified in the survey. The user group/land use categories used in this study were those identified in the user survey and include the following: • Retail • Restaurant • Office • Miscellaneous (includes cinema, art center, etc.) The results of the user surveys were used in conjunction with the hourly parking utilization during summer months for Areas 1 and 2 to prepare Figure 11. Figure 11 illustrates the parking demand generated by retail uses, restaurant, office, cinema on Fridays during the summer months. It can be seen from these figures that not only does the magnitude of the parking demand vary by time of day for each land use type, but the pattern of parking demand varies differently for each land use. The peak parking demand and the time of day when this peak demand occurs is summarized below: PEAK PARKING DEMAND FOR EACH LAND USE - FRIDAYS •Retail 331 spaces 3 p.m. •Restaurant 696 spaces 8 p.m. •Office 162 spaces 9 a.m. •Miscellaneous Total 459 spaces 1,648 spaces 10 P.M. The parking demand for office use peaks at 10 a.m. on Fridays while retail uses peak at 3 p.m. and restaurants peak at 8 p.m. Combining the parking demand profiles for each of the land uses results in an hourly pattern of parking demand for the entire downtown which does not match any of the individual uses but does indicate a profile which provides an example of the shared use concept which is in effect in Downtown Huntington Beach. The total parking demand for the downtown area, which is illustrated in Figure 12, is a combination of each of the four specific land uses and several miscellaneous uses. It can be seen that during the period of peak parking demand within Areas 1 and 2 of the study area, a total parking demand of 1,406 spaces is generated at 9 to 10 p.m. The parking demand generated by each of the primary land use types identified above which occurs at 9 p.m. is as follows: 39 800 700 600 U)Lu '500 v xw 0 400 o wm 300z 200 100 0 FIGURE 11 HOURLY VARIATION OF PARKING DEMAND BY LAND USE FRIDAY 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY MRETAIL OFFICE ORESTAURANT OCINEMA 2,400 2,200 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 FIGURE 12 SUMMARY OF UTILIZATION SURVEY FRIDAY Area 1 & 2 Supply = 1,870 spaces ..................................................................................................................................................................... . 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM 1,406 MISC O RESTAURANT OCINEMA OFFICE RETAIL 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 PM PM PM AM b TIME OF DAY PEAK PARKING DEMAND FOR FRIDAY BY LAND USE (9 p.m.) •Retail 193 spaces •Restaurant 675 spaces •Office 3 spaces •Miscellaneous 535 spaces Total 1,406 spaces Figure 12 indicates that a parking demand of 136 spaces is generated by miscellaneous uses other than cinema during the peak period of 9 to 10 p.m. As indicated, the conditions illustrated in Figure 12 are an example of the concept of shared parking in operation. This concept allows various land uses to share in a common supply of parking by taking advantage of the variation in the hourly demand for parking so that a smaller supply of parking can accommodate the needs of the entire area than if the parking for each use was provided separately. The data above indicates that the actual peak parking demand currently generated by the four specific land uses in Downtown Huntington Beach is 1,406 spaces but the sum of the peak parking demands for each of the individual uses is 1,648 spaces. Figure 13 provides the hourly variation for each land use for Saturdays. The data in Figure 13 indicates that the parking demand by primary land use during the peak period for each individual land use is: PEAK PARKING DEMAND FOR EACH LAND USE - SATURDAYS •Retail 367 spaces 3 p m. •Restaurant 615 spaces 8 p.m. •Office 30 spaces 10 a m •Miscellaneous 575 spaces 10 P.M. Total 1,587 spaces Figure 14 illustrates the parking demand for the entire study area with the four uses combined for a Saturday. The peak parking demand for the combination of the four land uses and some miscellaneous uses occurs at 3 p.m. and has a demand of 1,282 spaces. The parking demand generated by each of the four individual land uses is as follows: 42 FIGURE 13 HOURLY VARIATION OF PARKING DEMAND BY LAND USE SATURDAY 800 700 600 th 200 100 0 I 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY RETAIL OFFICE RESTAURANT CINEMA FIGURE 14 SUMMARY OF UTILIZATION SURVEY SATURDAY 2,400 2,200 2,000 Area 1 & 2 Supply = 1,870 spaces 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 MISC RESTAURANT CINEMA ® OFFICE ® RETAIL } d 600 400 200 0 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1,282 A 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY PEAK PARKING DEMAND FOR SATURDAYS BY LAND USE (3 p.m.) •Retail 367 spaces o Restaurant 491 spaces •Office 23 spaces ®Miscellaneous 401 spaces Total 1,282 spaces Figure 14 also illustrates the effects of shared parking in Downtown Huntington Beach on Saturdays indicating the advantages of common parking supply for mixed land uses. The peak parking demand is 1,282 spaces while the sum of the peak individual parking demands is 1,587 spaces. Parkin Demand and Parkin Generation Rates The inventory of the land uses under base conditions within the study area obtained from the City staff is summarized in Table 12 and was used to implement Steps 3 and 4. The table provides a summary of the land use by the category for the Areas 1 and 2, Parking Analysis Zones (PAZ) A to I. It indicates that there is a total of 352,675 square feet of occupied non-residential development in the study area. Of this total, 273,500 s.f. is located in Area 1 and 79,175 s.f. in Area 2. It should be noted that a large commercial development (Plaza Almeria) was recently completed in Block E but was not completed at the time of the parking surveys. Because the parking generation characteristics exhibited by users during the survey were not affected or influenced by the activities of this commercial project, the parking ratios should be developed without consideration of the project. The parking ratios, which reflect base conditions in Huntington Beach, are still valid for use in developing data which reflects existing conditions, i.e., conditions which include the project, and can also be used to project future conditions. Therefore, the land use inventory does not include this project and the development of the parking ratios is completed without this data. The land use data from Table 12 was used in conjunction with the parking demand data illustrated in Figure 11 and Figure 13 to develop parking demand rates for each of the land uses for Fridays and Saturdays, respectively. The following are issues which should be noted when reviewing the methodology used to develop the parking demand ratios for each of the land uses: Separate parking demand rates were developed for Friday and Saturday to ensure that all potential alternatives and conditions are addressed in this analysis. Although the parking demands generated by the study area appear to be higher on Fridays than on Saturdays, it is possible that some anomalies could exist, especially as they relate to specific land use categories. 45 TABLE 12 LAND USE INVENTORY IN DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA BASE CONDITIONS Block Restaurant Retail Office Misc. Occu ied Vacant Area 1 A 6,700 34,300 28,600 0 69,600 2,000 B 24,800 23,200 16,000 30,000 [a] 94,000 10,000 C 26,800 14,400 11,800 2,400 [b] 55,400 5,100 D 9,900 13,800 3,000 0 26,700 5,400 E UNDER CONSTRUCTION 0 41,000 F 1,200 7,200 19,400 0 27,800 0 Area 1 Total 69,400 92,900 78,800 32,400 273,500 63,500 Area 2 G 0 17,500 7,200 H 0 15,400 5,800 I 7,000 5,700 0 Area 2 Total 7,000 38,600 13,000 Total of Area 1 & 2 76,400 131,500 91,800 Notes: [a] 1,750 seat cinema [b] Surf Museum [c] Auto Body Shop [d] Arts Center Source: City of Huntington Beach, September 1999. 0 24,700 2,000 10,000 [c] 31,200 0 10,575 [d] 23,275 0 20,575 79,175 2,000 52,975 352,675 65,500 46 ® The peak parking demands for the various land use categories do not all occur at the same time of the day. This difference is noted to ensure that the needs of each land use are addressed individually as well as within the context of the entire downtown area. • In order to develop a set of parking generation rates which can be used to project future parking requirements, it was determined that an adjustment factor of 1.10 would be applied to the actual parking demand which provides a 10% contingency factor in the identification of potential solutions for the area. This 10% contingency is a standard adjustment used in the planning of parking systems. The parking demand ratios that are developed in this analysis reflect the effects of shared parking in the area because of the interrelationship of the land uses. The survey results verify that most patrons make multiple purpose trips when visiting Downtown Huntington Beach. The parking demand ratios for each of the land use categories are summarized in Table 13 It can be seen that the table provides the existing land use density in each land use category (i.e., base conditions at the time of the parking surveys), the number of parking spaces generated during the peak period by users of each category, the unadjusted parking demand ratio, and the adjusted parking demand ratio using the 1.10 factor to provide the 10% contingency. This contingency is a nationally accepted standard used in conducting parking planning studies and is, therefore, an appropriate adjustment when developing parking rates for code requirements. Parking ratios are provided for both Fridays and Saturdays. It can be seen that the comparison of parking demand ratio for Fridays and Saturdays indicate that there is no pattern between days for higher rates. The ratios for retail and cinema are higher on Saturday while the ratios for office and restaurants are higher on Friday. The higher of the two ratios was used to develop the projections of future parking demand and for the purposes of developing a revised set of parking standards for Downtown Huntington Beach. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING PARKING DEMAND The analysis of the parking demand conditions currently found in Downtown Huntington Beach must assess the level of activity in the study area as a whole and in each individual PAZ to ensure at both the global and local issues are fully analyzed and ultimately addressed. To conduct an analysis of existing conditions that is both accurate and relevant, it is necessary to adjust the "base conditions", i.e., parking conditions as observed from data obtained in the surveys, to reflect actual existing conditions at the time of the analysis. The Plaza Almeria project, which was under construction at the time the parking utilization surveys were conducted, is now completed and should be assumed to a part of the Existing Conditions. This project is located in Block E and provides a total of 41,000 square feet of commercial development. 47 TABLE 13 PARKING DEMAND RATIOS BY LAND USE TYPE DERIVED FROM SURVEYS Number of FRIDAY Implied Number of SATURDAY Implied Land Use Size Occupied S aces Peak Time Parking Ratio a Occupied S aces Peak Time Parking Ratio a Retail 131,500 sf 331 3:00 PM 2.80 367 3.00 PM 3.10 Office 91,800 sf 162 9:00 AM 1.97 30 10:00 AM 0.37 Cinema 1,750 seats 459 10:00 PM 0.29 575 10:00 PM 0.37 Restaurant 76,400 sf 696 8.00 PM 10.13 615 8:00 PM 8.95 [a] Includes 10% contingency; per 1,000 s.f. 48 Ad'ustments to Reflect Existin Conditions The land use inventory of base conditions in the downtown area in September 1999 summarized in Table 12, which is referred to as Base Land Use Conditions, indicates that there was a total of 352,675 square feet of occupied commercial development at that time. Of this total, 273,500 square feet was located in Area 1 and 79,175 square feet in Area 2. The table also provides a block by block breakdown of the inventory by land use type. The current land use inventory, including the addition of the project, which is summarized in Table 14 and is referred to as Existing Land Use Conditions, has a total of 393,675 square feet of commercial development. The land use description for the Plaza Almeria project, which accounts for the 41,000 square foot difference between base and existing conditions, includes the following program: • Restaurant 15,000 square feet • Retail 15,000 • Office 11,000 • Parking 204 spaces (includes 36 on-street spaces) The project also includes 42 residential units and 97 parking spaces that are dedicated to the residential units. The dwelling units and the associated parking are not included in the inventory or the analysis. As indicated in Table 14, the Existing Land Use Conditions for the study area have 314,500 square feet of commercial development in Area 1 and 79,175 square feet in Area 2. Anal sis of Ad'usted Data Parking demand for the Downtown Huntington Beach study area for Existing Parking Utilization under Summer Conditions on a Friday is illustrated in Figure 15. The hourly profile of parking demand in the study area includes two adjustments over data observed in the utilization surveys. The first adjustment reflects the summertime peak conditions versus the September data that was collected, i.e., the use of an adjustment factor of 1.32. The second adjustment reflects the addition of parking demand generated by the new 41,000 sq. ft. mixed-use commercial project in Block E to reflect existing conditions rather than the base conditions measured during the surveys. Figure 16 illustrates the Existing Parking Utilization under Summer Conditions on a Saturday. The data in Figures 15 and 16 indicate that the peak parking demand by land use type under existing conditions is as follows: 49 TABLE 14 LAND USE INVENTORY IN DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS Block Restaurant Retail Office Misc. Occu ied Vacant Area 1 A 6,700 34,300 28,600 0 69,600 2,000 B 24,800 23,200 16,000 30,000 [a] 94,000 10,000 C 26,800 14,400 11,800 2,400 [b] 55,400 5,100 D 9,900 13,800 3,000 0 26,700 5,400 E 15,000 15,000 11,000 0 41,000 0 F 1,200 7,200 19,400 0 27,800 0 Area 1 Total 84,400 107,900 89,800 32,400 314,500 22,500 Area 2 G 0 17,500 H 0 15,400 I 7,000 5,700 Area 2 Total 7,000 38,600 7,200 0 24,700 2,000 5,800 10,000 [c] 31,200 0 0 10,575 [d] 23,275 0 13,000 20,575 79,175 2,000 Total of Area 1 & 2 91,400 146,500 Notes: [a] 1,750 seat cinema [b] Surf Museum [c] Auto Body Shop [d] Arts Center Source: City of Huntington Beach 102,800 52,975 393,675 50 24,500 FIGURE 15 EXISTING PARKING DEMAND UNDER PEAK SUMMER CONDITIONS FRIDAY 2,400 2,200 - Area 1 & 2 Supply = 2,074 spaces 000oooo.aoo.o••o.mor.a.........o•aooaoeoaoeaeoooaaooaeeooe ooo•ooo. oooooooaooeoaoaoooaeoeoooeo o aoeoaoooeoo 2,000 - 1,800 - 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 - 800 600 400 200 0 ?- It V, i ,. 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM 1,561 MISC RESTAURANT CINEMA OFFICE ® RETAIL 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY FIGURE 16 EXISTING PARKING DEMAND UNDER PEAK SUMMER CONDITIONS SATURDAY 2400 MISC 2200 -Area 1 & 2 Supply = 2,074 spaces O RESTAURANT OCINEMA• .................................................................................• •........................ 2000 OFFICE 1800 M RETAIL 1600 w 1,423J v 1400xw LL 1200 ww 1000 z 800 600 ., _t 400 200 0 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY Friday (9 p.m.)Saturda 3 m. Retail 215 409 Restaurant 807 587 Office 4 26 Miscellaneous 535 401 Total 1,561 1,423 The analysis of the existing parking conditions was conducted by assessing parking demand/supply relationships for each block as well as Area 1, Area 2 and the study area as a whole. Table 15 summarizes the peak parking demand by Parking Analysis Zone (PAZ), the available parking supply, and the percent utilization of this supply during peak conditions for Fridays and Saturdays. It can be seen from Table 15 that the overall peak parking demand of 1,561 spaces on Friday and 1,423 spaces on Saturday represents 75% and 69% of the total supply of parking available. This indicates that a relatively large surplus, 513 spaces on Friday and 651 spaces on Saturday, is still available even on summer days with the addition of the new project in Block E and taking into consideration the adjustment factor for peak conditions during the summer. The data indicates, however, that a few of the individual PAZ's are currently experiencing a high rate of parking utilization during the summertime peak. PAZ D and PAZ I have utilization rates of over 75% on Friday or Saturday, or both days under existing conditions. Although a utilization rate of 75% is not critical, it is elevated to a degree that should be monitored as development in the downtown continues. ISSUES The data discussed above was used to develop an understanding of the existing parking demand and its relationship to the supply. The analysis indicates that existing parking demands are currently satisfied by the available supply. The current demand is 78% of the available supply in Area 1 and 57% of the supply in Area 2 for an overall average of 75%. A more detailed assessment of the parking utilization data indicates that PAZ D and I are the only zones with a usage that is over 90% on Fridays and PAZ C on Saturdays. Table 16 summarizes proposed parking requirement ratios for the Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Master Plan area based on this analysis. The table compares the possible rates to those that currently exist in the study area for Areas 1 and 2. It can be seen that the possible rates are similar to those that currently exist but include potential changes that would affect the on-site parking requirements for future development projects. 53 TABLE 15 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS - PEAK PARKING DEMAND PLANNING EXISTING FRIDAYS SATURDAYS ANALYSIS PARKING NUMBER OF NUMBER OF ZONE SUPPLY OCCUPIED SPACES ova OCCUPIED OCCUPIED SPACES OCCUPIED A 236 176 75%161 68% B 317 190 60%104 33% C 54 40 74%51 94% D 862 785 91%647 75% E 204 155 76%141 69% F 102 45 44%86 84% AREA 1 TOTAL 1,775 1,391 78%1,190 67% G 103 41 40%82 80% H 153 86 56%113 74% I 43 43 100%38 88% AREA 2 TOTAL 299 170 57%233 78% STUDY AREA TOTAL 2,074 1,561 75%1,423 69% TABLE 16 PROPOSED PARKING RATIO FOR DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Proposed Current City Parking Downtown Shared Rate [a] Land Use Parking Ratio [a]Area 1 Area 2 Retail 3.00 4.00 2.50 Office 2.00 1.00 2.00 Cinema 0.30 0.20 n/a Restaurant 10.00 6.67 10.00 [a] Per 1,000 s f of floor area. 54 VII. FUTURE PARKING DEMAND In order to develop a recommended parking management plan for Downtown that will serve the needs of the city for the next ten years and beyond, it is necessary to estimate the future parking demand for the study area based on future land use development projections. This analysis will provide a realistic assessment of future conditions in the study area based on parking demand characteristics exhibited by users of the existing system. The following chapter describes the methodology used to develop these future parking demand forecasts, discusses the projected parking supply/demand relationship for the study area, and identifies parking issues which must be addressed, and locates the potential problem areas. FORECASTING METHODOLOGY Land use forecasts for the Downtown Huntington Beach study area were obtained from the city and used to project future parking demand expected to be generated by the changes in commercial activity in the study area. The land use forecasts represent the city's projected expectation for the buildout of the study area. The future parking demand by land use for Areas 1 and 2 was estimated by using the parking demand rates developed for Downtown Huntington Beach, as described above, along with the City's land use forecasts. The hourly variation in parking demand for each land use was also estimated to ensure that a realistic projection of parking demand for each land use was developed in order to identify the most critical period of the day under these future conditions. These parking demand estimates resulted in forecasts of future conditions for Fridays and Saturdays under buildout conditions in the downtown study area. FUTURE LAND USE FORECASTS The City Department of Planning has developed a land use scenario for the study area that estimates future buildout of Downtown Huntington Beach. The forecasts which describe this scenario, the proposed Master Plan Land Use Buildout, were developed within the context of two issues which affect the ultimate plan: • In the approval of the Downtown Parking Master Plan, the California Coastal Commission has imposed a requirement on the City of Huntington Beach that limits the density of commercial development in the Downtown Master Plan area to 500,000 square feet. This limit is based on conditions that assume that the existing parking system has a supply of 1,984 parking spaces. 55 • The City is currently analyzing future development throughout the study area. The proposed future development is expected to add over 315,000 square feet of commercial development in Blocks A to I in Areas 1 and 2. As indicated, the City has forecasted future land use conditions in the study area that reflect buildout of the Downtown Master Plan area. Table 17 summarizes the density of development projected under these future conditions including development under Existing Conditions as well as the incremental increase projected for each block by land use type. Future growth is expected to include the following approximate levels of additional development: •Retail 149,000 square feet •Restaurant 52,000 •Office 23,000 •Hotel 139 rooms (103,110 square feet) •Parking 403 spaces Table 17, which summarizes the Downtown Master Plan Buildout, indicates that the buildout of the study area would result in 709,806 square feet of total commercial development, 626,085 square feet in Area 1 and 83,721 square feet in Area 2. The buildout scenario for Downtown Huntington Beach includes a total of 143,747 square feet of restaurant use, 295,320 square feet of retail, 125,454 square feet of office, 30,000 square feet of cinema, and a 139-room hotel. A remaining 12,175 square feet of development would be for miscellaneous uses. PEAK PARKING DEMAND From the analysis discussed in Chapter VI, the parking demand characteristics exhibited by the various land use types in the study area under base conditions were used to estimate future parking demand under Master Plan Buildout conditions. The results of the analysis of existing parking conditions indicated that the parking demand for each land use type varied by time of day and by day of week. These variations, which allow the City of Huntington Beach to take advantage of the shared parking concept, were also included in the preparation of the parking demand projections for the study area under buildout conditions. Figure 17 illustrates the hourly variation of the parking demand for each land use type as a percentage of the peak parking demand on a Friday. The figure illustrates the percentage of the peak parking demand that is generated during each hour of the day by each land use type. The peak parking demand rates, which were developed under base conditions, and the hourly variation graphs illustrated in Figure 17 were used with the land use projections to develop a parking demand profile for the study area under Downtown Master Plan Buildout conditions. Figure 18 illustrates the parking demand profile for the study area for a Friday under these future buildout conditions. The figure indicates that the peak daily parking demand for the study would 56 TABLE 17 LAND USE FORECASTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN PARKING MASTER PLAN AREA BUILDOUT CONDITIONS Block Restaurant Retail Office Misc.Total Area 1 A 51,693 118,338 40,779 103,110 [a]313,920 B 31,773 27,834 16,000 30,000 [b]105,607 C 28,335 37,815 23,975 1,600 [c]91,725 D 5,000 24,073 3,000 32,073 E 15,000 15,000 11,000 41,000 F 4,000 24,760 13,000 41,760 Subtotal 135,801 247,820 107,754 134,710 626,085 Area 2 G 0 25,000 4,700 29,700 H 0 20,000 13,000 33,000 1 7,946 2,500 0 10,575 [d]21,021 Subtotal 7,946 47,500 17,700 10,575 83,721 Total of Area 1 & 2 143,747 295,320 125,454 145,285 709,806 Notes: [a] 139 room hotel [b] 1,750 seat Cinema [c] Police substation [d] Art Center Source: City of Huntington Beach 57 FIGURE 17 HOURLY VARIATION OF PARKING DEMAND AS PERCENTAGE OF PEAK DEMAND FRIDAY 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 100% 90% 80% 70% 900 1000 1100 1200 AM AM AM PM 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 900 1000 1100 1200 AM AM AM PM i 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%14 _ 100 PM 200 PM 300 400 500 600 PM PM PM PM TIME OF DAY 700 PM 800 PM 900 PM 1000 1100 1200 PM PM AM 900 AM 1000 1100 1200 AM AM PM 100 PM 200 PM 300 PM 400 500 600 PM PM PM TIME OF DAY 700 PM 800 PM 900 PM 1000 1100 1200 PM PM AM 0 RETAIL OCINEMA 100% 90% 1.R 80%11 70% 60% LL 50% 2 40% w 30%UK 20% 10%I 0%4N 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 900 1000 1100 1200 100 200 300 400 500 800 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY ©OFFICE 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 900 10 00 11 00 12 00 1 00 2 00 3 00 4 00 500 600 7 00 8 00 9 00 10 00 11 00 12 00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY [OHOTE1 TIME OF DAY 0 RESTAURANT "^'^" ,)urly v : --' -s from "Q""-1 Parkr-" '-pan Lar"^-• • de. 19P' FIGURE 18 FUTURE PARKING DEMAND UNDER PEAK SUMMER CONDITIONS FRIDAY 2,600 Projected Parking Supply = 2,271 spaces................................................................................................................................................... 2,401 .............................. 2,400 2,200 2,000 1,800 Cl) v 1,600 -J 2 >1,400 ILL O w 1,200w 1,000 z 800 600 400 200 0 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY I DMP Buildout Conditions occur at night on Fridays at 9 p.m. with a peak demand of 2,401 spaces. The daytime peak, which occurs at 12 p.m., is 1,915 spaces. Figures 19 and 20 illustrate the parking demand variations for each land use type and the projected parking demand under buildout, respectively, for Saturdays in the Downtown study area. The peak parking conditions on Saturday is expected to occur at 3 p.m. with a peak demand of 2,247 spaces. ANALYSIS OF FUTURE PARKING DEMAND The future parking demand projected for the study area was analyzed to assess the ability of the proposed parking system to accommodate the peak summertime demands expected to be generated by the buildout of the commercial development. Future Parkin Su I The supply of parking in the study area under buildout conditions is based on forecasts of changes that are expected based on information provided by the City staff. Increases and losses in parking supply are expected to occur as a result of the following: • A net increase of 204 spaces from the completion of the Plaza Almeria project. • A net increase of 189 spaces from the potential development of Block A with a loss of 214 spaces and an increase of 403 spaces. These figure are for the commercial uses on the site only. • A net increase of 30 spaces on 5`h Street based on 90-degree layout. Figure 21 illustrates a summarized version of the projected parking supply under these future buildout conditions in the study area on a block-by-block basis. Results of Demand/Su I Anal sis Table 18 summarizes the results of this analysis indicating the future parking supply, the peak parking demand and the projected surplus or deficit. The table provides an assessment of future parking conditions for both Area 1 and Area 2 as well for the entire Downtown Parking Master Plan area. The table projects the future parking demand/supply relationship for peak conditions during the day and at night under summer conditions. It can be seen that a surplus is expected during the daytime peak but a shortage of 130 spaces overall is projected at night. This shortage occurs because of the 245-space shortage in Area 1 which is partially compensated by a surplus of 115 spaces in Area 2. 60 TABLE 18 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF FUTURE PARKING DEMAND Block Future Su I Da Future Demand a Surplus/ Deficit Future Su I Ni ht Future Demand a Surplus/ Deficit Area 1 1,972 1,697 275 1,972 2,217 (245) Area 2 299 218 81 299 184 115 Total of rea 1 & 2 2,271 1,915 356 2,271 2,401 (130) Note: [a] Includes some pier/beach and resident users. 61 FIGURE 19 HOURLY VARIATION OF PARKING DEMAND AS PERCENTAGE OF PEAK DEMAND SATURDAY 9 00 1000 1100 1200 100 200 3 00 4 00 500 600 7 00 8 00 9 00 1000 900 10 00 1100 12 00 100 2 00 3 00 400 500 600 7 00 800 900 10 00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%ri 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%14 TIME OF DAY D RETAIL 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 900 1000 1100 1200 100 200 3.00 400 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM TIME OF DAY ®OFFICE 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 900 10 00 11 00 1200 100 200 300 4 00 500 600 7 00 800 900 1000 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM TIME OF DAY OHOTEL 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% TIME OF DAY OCINEMA 500 600 700 800 900 1000 900 1000 1100 1200 100 200 300 400 500 6 00 700 800 900 1000 PM PM PM PM PM PM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM TIME OF DAY P RESTAURANT "^'^' ^urly va• '•^^ •- from " "^•^ Parkin`" ' •^^ Land '^^'•'•'^ 1987 FIGURE 20 FUTURE PARKING DEMAND UNDER PEAK SUMMER CONDITIONS SATURDAY 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2.00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5.00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY I El DMP Buildout Conditions GPI c t 9 S 2 1 m YGt1YAV 4 1G 1 LEGEND: •• - Downtown Parking Master Plan Boundary ® Meter Space: 2hr, $1.501hr Meter Space: 2hr, $1.001u - Meter Space: lhr, $1.001hr #G - 24 Minutes k I Cn I #H -Handicap #Y - Yellow Loading Zone #W - White Passenger Zone #P - Reserved Police # - No Restriction 4 3 1 F2 9 ®- Off-Street Parking Lot 'D NOT 10 SCALE KAKU ASSOCIATES FIGURE 21 FUTURE PARKING SUPPLY 64 4 i VIII. STRATEGIES FOR DOWNTOWN The previous chapters of this report have described existing conditions, projected future conditions based on land use forecasts consistent with the Buildout of the Downtown Master Plan area, and have identified potential areas that may need to be addressed as part of the update for the Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Master Plan. The analysis of existing parking conditions in the Downtown study area indicates that the current supply of parking is adequate to accommodate current demand. The analysis indicates that overall the study area has sufficient excess capacity to accommodate increases in parking demand up to 513 spaces under summer conditions. The analysis of future conditions indicates that a shortage of 130 spaces overall is projected at night. This shortage occurs because of the 245-space shortage in Area 1 that is partially compensated by a surplus of 115 spaces in Area 2. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL PARKING NEEDS The analysis of future parking demand in the downtown area has indicated that a potential deficiency would exist in the study area with buildout of the master land use plan. At closer inspection, the results indicate that the deficiency in Area 1 could be as high as 130 spaces with a surplus of 115 spaces in Area 2. A review of these future conditions reveals the following: ® Although it appears that the localized deficiency in Area 1 may be as high as 130 spaces, the size of the downtown area is such that most of the parking supply located in Area 2 can conveniently serve the needs of Area 1. Therefore, the local needs are not as relevant as the overall study area needs in the identification of the future requirements for downtown. ® The analysis of future parking conditions assumes that other than the potential development on Block A, no additional parking supply would be provided by any of the new projects in the area. Although the specific nature of these projects is not known at this time, the total future density of development projected for the area in the buildout scenario over and above that projected for Block A is about 73,000 square feet of commercial development. ® A review of the projected development of Block A indicates that a possible parking supply of 403 spaces is anticipated as part of the development of this site. The development of the site would result in the loss of 214 existing spaces resulting in a net increase of 189 spaces. The peak parking demand 65 generated by the potential development of this site is estimated to be 690 spaces. Based on this assessment, the current development program expected for Block A would result in a net deficiency of 501 spaces. The analysis of future parking conditions is based on peak summertime conditions in Downtown Huntington Beach. These peak conditions only occur during the 13 weeks between the beginning of June through the end the August. The absolute peak parking demand is only generated on Fridays and Saturdays and primarily at night. Parkin Demand for Develo ment of Block A The City expects that the potential development of Block A would include 243,610 square feet of commercial development. This is based on the following potential development program assumed for the site: •Restaurant 44,210 square feet •Retail 89,860 •Office 6,430 •Hotel 139 rooms (103,110 square feet) If the existing city parking code requirements were strictly applied to each of the land use densities described above, the parking requirement for this project would be 834 spaces. If the parking rates for commercial properties developed from survey data as summarized in Table 16 are strictly applied, the required parking would be 899 spaces. However, a more realistic assessment of the potential parking demand generated by a project with a land use mix and densities as described above would be to take advantage of the hourly variation in the parking demand profile of each land use. The shared parking applications for the possible development project on Block A can be viewed as small version of the shared parking system that exists in Downtown Huntington Beach today and is expected to continue as additional development occurs. Assuming that each land use type in the possible development on Block A would have a parking demand profile similar to that exhibited by existing land uses in the Downtown study area, a parking demand profile for the project was developed. This profile, which is illustrated in Figure 22, identifies the parking demand by time of day for each of the potential land uses in this projected mixed-use project. Each use has its own unique parking demand profile both in terms of the peak demand and the hourly variation of the demand. The peak parking demand for this project as described above is 690 spaces. Although the peak demand projected for the Block A development is less than the parking requirement based on city code, it is more than the projected supply of 403 spaces anticipated for this site. It is also anticipated that the implementation of the development project on Block A 66 FIGURE 22 PROJECTED PARKING DEMAND FOR POTENTIAL BLOCK A DEVELOPMENT 800 700 600 528 690 200 100 0 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM TIME OF DAY RETAIL OFFICE ORESTAURANT MHOTEL would result in the loss of 150 spaces of existing parking supply and the elimination of existing uses that generate a parking demand of 64 spaces. Therefore, the incremental increase in the supply of parking provided by the potential development of Block A, which is 253 spaces, is 437 spaces less than the incremental increase in parking demand expected to be generated by its implementation. A net deficiency of 437 spaces would result if the project is developed as currently anticipated. SeasonallWeekl /Dail Variation of Parkin Demand As previously discussed, the level of activity in Downtown Huntington Beach and the associated parking demand, is directly related to the season of the year. The peak period of activity occurs during the 13-week period between June and August. Table 19, which was prepared from data obtained from the City staff, indicates the magnitude of the parking demand in Downtown Huntington Beach for each month of the year as a percentage of the parking demand during the peak month. The data indicates that parking demand for each of the months other than June, July and August is less than 77 percent of the parking demand during the peak month. If these percentages are applied to the results of the analysis of future parking conditions summarized in Table 18, the results can be used to assess the future parking conditions during all periods of the year other than the peak months between June and August. Table 20 summarizes the results of this analysis indicating that the parking demand during the other months of the year can be accommodated by the parking supply projected for the study area even under future buildout conditions in Downtown. Further investigation of parking demand data on a week-to-week and even day-to-day basis during the 13 weeks of the summer, the peak period, was conducted. The results of this analysis indicate that there is also a significant variation in the parking demand on a day-to-day basis. The two peak days are Friday and Saturday. The parking demand remains relatively high on Sundays but is significantly lower than the peak on Monday through Thursday. Table 21 was prepared to illustrate the magnitude of the parking demand for each day of the week as a percentage of the parking demand on Friday and Saturday. The data in this table also indicates that the parking demand on Monday through Thursday is 70 percent of the peak parking demand on Friday. If these percentages are also used to adjust the data in Table 19, the results indicate that the parking demand on Monday through Thursday can be accommodated by the projected supply in Downtown even during the peak summer peak months of June, July and August under buildout conditions. This analysis indicates that the peak parking demands projected for the study area generally occur only 3 days per week for 13 weeks, for a total of 39 days per year. The deficiencies that were identified only occur for 11 % of the year. During the remaining 326 days of the year, the projected parking demands can be accommodated by the projected parking supply. 68 TABLE 19 PARKING DEMAND BY MONTH AS PERCENTAGE OF PEAK DEMAND % of Peak Month Month a January 65% February 61% March 70% April 71% May 77% June 84% July 100% August 83% September 64% October 62% November 59% December 55% Note: [a] Based on Main Promenade parking structure data provided by the City of Huntington Beach. TABLE 20 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF MONTHLY PARKING DEMAND Pro'ected Parkin Su I =2,271 s aces Peak Parking Surplus/ Month Demand Deficit January 1,563 708 February 1,466 805 March 1,686 585 April 1,705 566 May 1,839 432 June 2,019 252 July 2,401 (130) August 1,998 273 September 1,544 727 October 1,484 787 November 1,410 861 December 1,329 942 TABLE 21 PARKING DEMAND BY DAY OF WEEK AS PERCENTAGE OF FRIDAY Da of the Week % of Peak Da a Sunday 86% Monday 67% Tuesday 68% Wednesday 70% Thursday 70% Friday 100% Saturda 97% Note: (a] Based on Main Promenade parking structure data provided by the City of Huntington Beach. 69 EVALUATION OF GENERAL STRATEGIES The potential parking strategies that were considered for the study can generally be categorized into three areas: • Those that relate to the policies regarding provision for providing on-site parking supply when prospective new development projects require entitlement to implement the proposal. • Those that would actually increase the supply of parking within the study area by constructing additional facilities or expanding existing facilities. • Those that would use parking supply in facilities outside the study area using shuttle buses and other related means to transport patrons to and from the study area. • Operational measures at existing facilities using attendants and/or valet service to parking vehicles in aisles and in tandem. • Use of the in-lieu parking fee fund to pay for the operational measures such as attendant parking and shuttle bus service. Provisions to Provide On-Site Parkin in New Develo ments Although it is allowable for development projects in the Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Master Plan area to pay an in-lieu fee to the City rather than provide the code-required parking supply in an on-site facility, effort should be made to encourage all larger developments to provide this on-site parking. It would be difficult for projects that are on a parcel of land that covers less that 1/2 block to provide on-site parking for their projects. Therefore, it is unrealistic to expect all potential new development projects to comply with this requirement. However, for those projects that have sufficient property, it may be more advantageous to the City to have projects provide at least some of the required parking on-site rather than to receive the in-lieu payment. Ca ital Im rovements Although the construction of additional capital intensive parking facilities is not the preferred strategy for the City of Huntington Beach, it is a solution that directly addresses the existing and future parking needs during both weekdays and on Saturday. This strategy is capable of adding parking supply to the area that can be dedicated to the growth and development planned and expected in the area. It would require that the city identify and acquire property, preferably property that is vacant or under-utilized, and construct a facility to address the potential deficiencies that are projected to occur at buildout. 70 Because the potential deficiencies in parking supply expected under buildout conditions would only occur on 11 % of the days of each year, use of this option does not appear to be a cost- effective means of addressing the parking problems identified above. Use of Off-Site Facilities Use of off-site parking is a concept that can be considered for use with employees but is not feasible for visitors. This concept has had some success with employees, especially in areas with heavy congestion and high parking rates. Use of off-site city-owned facilities is a concept that appears to be a compromise between the two discussed above. Use of off-site facilities provides additional parking supply to the study area without construction of new structures and makes use of facilities that do not have overlapping peak demands for parking. The most logical location for this off-site parking would be the beach parking facilities located on the south side of PCH along the beach areas. These facilities have little usage during the non-summer months and at night during the summer months. During the summer months, their peak usage is on weekend days and are under-utilized at night when the peaks occur in the Downtown area. However, they do have significant usage during the day on weekdays during summer months limiting their availability for any significant weekday deficiencies. Because this measure is not capital intensive and can be construed as more of an operational measure that would be implemented for limited periods of time, it may be a cost-effective measure to address these issues. However, the user survey indicates that only 13% of the Friday users of the parking system and 7% of the Saturday users are employees. Since the employees are the logical market source for this measure, its ability to be an effective means of addressing the issues is limited. Attendants and Valets The effective parking supply in a facility can be increased 20 to 30% if vehicles are parked in the aisles and in tandem using attendants and/or valets to continually maneuver these vehicles so users can have access without significant inconvenience. This measure can be a useful technique for parking shortages that occur occasionally and for a short period of time. It should not be viewed as a solution for a recurring problem that occurs on a regular basis during long periods of the day. Use of In-Lieu Fees for 0 erational Im rovements One strategy that has been under consideration is the use of the funds collected as part of the in- lieu fee program for Downtown Huntington Beach to implement some of the operational improvements suggested for the study area. These include the operation of the valet parking program and the potential shuttle bus system that would provide access to off-site parking facilities. A review of this concept indicates that these funds should be kept in reserve to finance 71 any future capital improvement project that may be needed. The funds, which were collected to allow the city to replace the on-site parking supply that was not provided by existing development projects in the area, should not be used for operational activities since they do not have a mechanism replace these funds. Operational measures are ongoing activities that should not be financed by a source that has a finite amount of funding. A separate source which has the ability to be replenished, even the general fund, should be used to implement operational improvements such shuttle bus service or attendant parking. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL FUTURE PARKING SCENARIOS An analysis was conducted to assess several future parking management scenarios for Downtown including one in which no changes are made, one which assumes that up to 50% of the potential new developments would provide on-site parking supply that satisfies the code requirements, and one which assumes only new projects over 30,000 square feet in density would be required to satisfy code requirements for on-site parking supply. The following conclusions, which were derived from summaries in Table 22, include the following: • The total peak parking demand on weekdays is projected to be 2,401 spaces at night. Based on the total future supply of 2,271 spaces, the future deficiency is projected to be 130 spaces. • If new developments in the study area provide at least 50% of its code required parking on-site, the potential parking deficiency in Area 1 is projected to be 121 spaces at buildout. This deficiency is compensated by a surplus of 133 spaces in Area 2. • If all new developments over 30,000 square feet in density in the study area provide its code required parking on-site, the potential parking deficiency in Area 1 is projected to be 135 spaces at buildout. The majority of the deficiency is compensated by a surplus of 130 spaces in Area 2. 72 TABLE 22 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS PARKING SCENARIOS Results of Analysis of Future Parking Demand Da Ni ht Future Future Surplus/ Block Su I Demand a Deficit Future Su I Future Demand a Surplus/ Deficit Area 1 1,972 1,697 275 1,972 2,217 (245) Area 2 299 218 81 299 184 115 Total of Area 1 & 2 2,271 1,915 356 2,271 2,401 (130) 50% of Future Developments to Provide Parking Da Ni ht Future Future Surplus/Future Future Surplus/ Block Su I Demand a Deficit Su I Demand a Deficit Area 1 2,096 1,697 399 2,096 2,217 (121) Area 2 317 218 99 317 184 133 Total of Area 1 & 2 2,413 1,915 498 2,413 2,401 12 Future Developments 30,000+ sf to Provide Parking Da Ni ht Future Future Surplus/ Future Future Surplus/ Block Su I Demand a -Deficit Su I Demand a Deficit Area" I 2,082 1,697 385 2,082 2,217 (135) Area 2 314 218 96 314 184 130 Total of Area 1 & 2 2,397 1,915 482 2,396 2,401 (5) Note: [a) Includes some pier/beach and resident users. 73 IX. RECOMMENDED PARKING MASTER PLAN The recommended parking improvement program for the Downtown Huntington Beach Parking Master Plan includes the following four strategies: STRATEGY 1: MODIFIED PARKING CODE REQUIREMENTS It is recommended that the City Parking Code Requirements for the Downtown Parking Master Plan be modified from the current requirements to the proposed rates. As indicated in Table 23, it is recommended that the same rate be used for both Areas 1 and 2. The table indicates the current rates that include separate rates for the two areas under existing conditions. It is also recommended that the provision that allows applicants to pay an in-lieu fee be maintained. This allows the City to maintain its flexibility in addressing each individual applicant's requests. STRATEGY 2: ON-SITE PARKING It is recommended that the city encourage all future projects proposing a density of development for a commercial project that is over 30,000 square feet to provide and satisfy at least 50% of its city code-required parking requirement. It is estimated that requiring these projects to develop 50% of the spaces would add a total of 100 to 150 spaces to the study area's inventory. If this policy were successfully implemented throughout the study area, the majority of the implied parking deficiency under buildout conditions could be addressed with existing and future supply. STRATEGY 3: PARKING MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES It recommended that the City require larger projects in the area, such as the potential development on Block A, to utilize on-site attendants during the peak season. The use of these attendants would allow the parking managers to provide valet service to patrons and other users of the system and allow for the use of tandem parking in the facilities. By parking vehicles in tandem and using the aisles, the effective capacity of the parking supply of these larger facilities can be increased. This measure is only required during the peak summer months, i.e., June through August, and would help address the implied parking deficiency that is projected in the study area at buildout. 74 TABLE 23 PROPOSED PARKING RATIO FOR DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Proposed Current City Parking Downtown Shared Rate [a] Land Use Parking Ratio [a]Area 1 Area 2 Retail 3.00 4.00 2.50 Office 2.00 1 00 2.00 Cinema 0.30 0 20 n/a Restaurant 10.00 6.67 10 00 [a] Per 1,000 s f of floor area. STRATEGY 4: USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPLY OF PARKING It is recommended that the City of Huntington Beach not engage in a capital improvement program to construct additional parking facilities to add to the supply of parking. A review of the current parking inventory in the periphery area of downtown, Blocks B1 to F2, and the beach parking south of Pacific Coast Highway indicates that there are hundreds of existing parking spaces in the area that are unoccupied during the peak nighttime periods. The results of the utilization surveys and observations made during these surveys indicates that there over 300 unoccupied parking spaces within a 2 to 3 block radius of the downtown area. Although these spaces cannot be include in the official inventory of parking for the Downtown Parking Master Plan Area, they can be viewed as supplemental spaces that are available for use during key critical periods. During the nighttime peak, even in the summer months, many of these spaces are available and can accommodate the excess demand that is projected to occur at buildout The fact that these projected deficiencies only occur for about 35 days of the year is not adequate justification to engage in a building program to add new parking facilities to the parking supply. APPENDIX A EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Existing and Proposed Development BLOCK A PRE-DEVELOPMENT (1982)EXISTING/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000)BUILDOUT (2005) ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 101 Main Retail 2,500 0 Oceanview Promenade Abdelmuti Oceanview Promenade Abdelmuti Residential Retail 13,953 13,953 2,798 30,299 2 (13 DU)Restaurant 2,798 109 Main Retail 2,500 0 Office 30,299 111 Main Retail 2,500 0 2 113 Main Retail 2,500 0 115 Main Retail 2,500 0 Office 2,500 406 PCH Restaurant 2,200 0 410 PCH Retail 4 000 10 117 Main Restaurant 2,500 0 117-123 Main Block 104/105 Office 2,500 Retail 9,525 89,860 44,210 6,430 103,110 403 119 Main Retail 2,500 0 Restaurant 4,685 Hotel 121 Main Retail 2,500 0 Office 4,050 123 Main Retail 1,500 2 416 PCH Retail Residential (4 du) 3,000 12 16 PCH Retail Residential (4 du) 3,000 12 122 5th Auto Sales 12,000 12 122 5th Auto Sales 12,000 12 151 5th Theatre 5,500 50 151 5th Theatre 5,500 50 501 Walnut Office 1,500 0 501 Walnut Office 1,500 0 505 Walnut Residential (1 du) 1,200 0 505 Walnut Residential (1 du) 1,200 0 504 PCH Retail 1,250 0 504 PCH Retail 1,250 0 508 PCH Restaurant 1,250 8 508 PCH Restaurant 1,250 8 Residential (1 du) 2 Residential (1 du) 2 520 PCH Retail Residential 1 du 1,500 16 520 PCH Retail Residential 1 du 1,500 16 127 Main Retail 3 500 6 127 Main Retail 3 500 6 Lane/Te 5,000 N/A 513 Walnut Retail 2,500 0 orth Pro'ect 'orth Pro'ect Residential B&B 12 B&B (12 du)(12 du)(12 du)12 519 Walnut Retail 800 0 128 6th Residential 1 du TOTAL:66,700 118 TOTAL:96,010 120 TOTAL:108,813 47,008 36,729 103,110 417 DPMP Update - Oct. 2000 Source : City of Huntington Beach Existing and Proposed Development BLOCK B PRE-DEVELOPMENT 1982 EXISTING/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000)BUILDOUT (2005) ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 112 Main Retail 2,500 Pierside Pavilion Pierside Pavilion 114 Main Retail 2,500 Retail 14,459 14,459 23,773 16,000 30,000 296 Residential Restaurant 23,773 306 PCH (4 du) Nite Club 5,500 25 Office 16,000 302 PCH Auto Repair 8,250 Theatre 30,000 115 3rd Auto Repair 4,500 12 (1,750 seats) 301 Walnut Office 2,400 296 311 Walnut Office 2,000 317 Walnut Retail 1,000 102 PCH Residential 1 du 85 Pier Colon - Pier Colon 112 3rd 24 130 du 130 du 118 3rd Res. (2 du) 120 3rd Res (1 du) 122 3rd Res. (4 du) 124 3rd Res. (1 du) 217 Walnut 215 Walnut 213 Walnut 127 2nd Res. (1 du) Res. (1 du) Res. (1 du) Res. 1 du 126 Main Retail/ Res. (6du) 5,875 Standard Market Retail 5,875 . Standard Market 5,875 3,000 Restaurant 3,000 116 Main Retail 2,500 116 Main Retail 2,500 2,500 118 Main Retail 2,500 118 Main Retail 2,500 2,500 120 Main Retail 2,875 120 Main Retail 2,875 2,500 122 Main Retail 1,250 122 Main Retail 1,250 2,500 124 Main Retail 2,125 124 Main Retail 2,125 2,500 TOTAL:45 775 146 TOTAL:104 357 296 TOTAL:27 834 31 773 16 000 30 000 296 Source* City of Huntington BeachDPMP Update - Oct 2000 Existing and Proposed Development BLOCK C PRE-DEVELOPMENT 1982 EXISTING/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000 BUILDOUT (2005 ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 201 Main Restaurant 2,125 201 Main Restaurant 5,000 201 Main 4,500 5000 203 Main Retail 2,875 203 Main Retail 4,500 205 Main Retail 1 650 205 Main Retail 1,650 205 Main 1 650 207 Main Retail 4 900 207 Main Retail 4,900 207 Main 4,900 209 Main Restaurant 2,000 209 Main Restaurant 2,000 209 Main 2,000 211 Main Retail 2,625 211 Main Retail 2,625 211 Main 2,625 675 Office 675 213 Main Retail 540 213 Main Retail 540 213 Main 540 1,585 213 1/2 Main Restaurant 585 213 1/2 Main Restaurant 585 213 1/2 Main Patio 1,000 215 Main Restaurant 1,750 215 Main Office 1,800 215 Main 2,500 1,800 Res. (6 du)Restaurant 1,750 Patio 750 217 Main MTG Room 1,000 217 Main Restaurant 1,000 217 Main 2,500 Patio 1,500 221 Main Retail 2,500 6 221 Main Retail 4,250 221 Main 4,250 9,100 4,200 223 Main Retail 1,750 223 Main Restaurant 9,100 223 Main Res. 4 du Office 4,200 411 Olive Retail 2,000 6 11 Olive Retail 4,400 6 411 Olive 4,400 2,400 Office 2,400 12 Walnut Restaurant 1,800 12 Walnut Restaurant 3,600 12 Walnut 3,600 Office 1,800 202 5th Res. (6 du)202 5th Office 1,600 202 5th 1,600 1,600 Police 1,600 Police 206 5th Res 1 du 206 5th 208 5th Restaurant 4,000 2 208 5th Retail 1,000 2 208 5th 1,000 3,500 Res (2 du)Restaurant 3,000 Patio 500 214 5th Auto Repair 5,000 214 5th Retail 5,000 214 5th 5,000 3,000 Office 3,000 218 5th Office 1,000 2 218 5th Retail 2,500 2 218 5th 2,500 2,500 Office 2,500 220 5th Office 1,000 2 220 5th Retail 2,500 2 220 5th 2,500 2,500 Office 2,500 222 5th Retail 3,500 4 222 5th Retail 3,500 4 222 5th 3,500 3,500 Res. 2 du Office 3,500 TOTAL:44,400 22 TOTAL:90,925 16 TOTAL:37,365 29,785 22,175 1,600 0 Source : City of Huntington BeachDPMP Update - Oct. 2000 BLOCK D Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT (1982)EXISTINGIAPPROVED DEVELOPMENT 2000)BUILDOUT (2005) ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 202 Main Retail 5875 Main Promenade Main Promenade 1750 Retail 24,073 24,073 5,000 3,000 815 208 Main Office 5,500 Restaurant 5,000 210 Main Retail 2,750 Office 3,000 212 Main Retail! Res (6 2,750 815 214 Main Retail! Res (6 2,750 218 Main Retail 5,875 220 Main Retail 1,250 10 222 Main Office 1,500 224 Main Retail 2,938 226 Main Retail 2,938 228 Main Retail/ Res (6 2,938 6 209 3rd n!a 40 211 3rd Res (6 du) 218 3rd n/a 30 221 3rd Res (1 du) 223 3rd Res (2 du) 225 3rd n/a 24 321 Walnut Office 1,000 TOTAL:39,814 110 TOTAL:32,073 815 TOTAL:24,073 5,000 3,000 815 DPMP Update - Oct. 2000 Source: City of Huntington Beach BLOCK E Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT 1982 EXISTINGIAPPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000)BUILDOUT (2005) ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 303 Main Retail 500 12 Plaza Almeria Plaza Almeria 305 Main Retail! Res (8 1,750 4 Retail 15,000 15,000 15,000 11,000 Res 42 du 168 307 Main Retail! Res (8 1,750 4 Restaurant 15,000 includes 309 Main Retail 2,938 8 Office 11,000 11 shared 311 Main Retail 1,600 20 Other Res 42 du 325 Main n/a 40 302 5th Retail 5,500 20 Office 5,500 310 5th Retail/ Res (2 2,125 314 5th Office 3,500 328 5th Res (1 du) 320 5th n/a 25 TOTAL:25,163 133 TOTAL:41,000 0 TOTAL:15,000 15,000 11,000 168 DPMP Update - Oct. 2000 Source, City of Huntington Beach BLOCK F Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT (1982)EXISTING/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000)BUILDOUT (2005) ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 316 Olive Post Office 3,575 316 Olive Post Office 3,575 316 Olive 5,000 3,575 M 316 M R tail 0005 316 Main Post Officeain316 318 Main Retail 1,250 6 ain 318 Main e Retail , 1,250 6 318 Main 6,000 4,000 8,000 320 Main Retail 1,250 6 320 Main Retail 1,250 6 320 Main 322 Main Office 1,000 6 322 Main Office 1,000 6 322 Main 324 Main Office 1,000 2 324 Main Office 1,000 2 324 Main 326 Main Office 2,250 6 326 Main Office 2,250 6 326 Main 328 Main Retail 4,250 328 Main Retail 4,250 328 Main 303 3rd Auto Re air 8,250 303 3rd Health Club 8,250 303 3rd 13,200 315 3rd Office 2,500 25 315 3rd Office 2,500 25 315 3rd 2,500 305 Oran e Office 2 500 6 305 Oran e Office 2,500 6 305 Oran e 2 500 TOTAL:27 825 57 TOTAL:32 825 57 TOTAL:24 200 4 000 13 000 3 575 0 DPMP Update - Oct. 2000 Source: City of Huntington Beach Existing and Proposed Development BLOCK G PRE-DEVELOPMENT 1982)EXISTING/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000 BUILDOUT (2005 ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 20 5th Retail 2,500 own S uare own S uare 416 Orange Res (1 du)Retail 10,000 15 10,000 Res 89 du 15 408 5th Res (1 du)Residential 89 du 410 5th Res (1 du) 412 5th Office 1,000 416 5th Res 1 du 401 Main Retail 7,700 01 Main Retail 7,700 01 Main 7,700 405 Main Retail n/a 17 05 Main Retail 4,000 05 Main 4,000 411 Main Retail 3,300 11 Main Retail 3,300 11 Main 3,300 417 Main Office 2,500 17 Main 2,500 417 Main 2,500 419 Main Office 2,200 19 Main 2 200 19 Main 2200 TOTAL:19 200 17 TOTAL:29 700 15 TOTAL:25 000 4 700 15 Source: City of Huntington BeachDPMP Update - Oct 2000 Existing and Proposed Development BLOCK H PRE-DEVELOPMENT 1982)EXISTING/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000)BUILDOUT 2005) ADDRESS 410 Main USE Retail SIZE 6,900 PARKING 24 NAME 410 Main USE Retail SIZE 6,900 PARKING 24 NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER Fourth Block East PARKING 424 Main Auto Repair 8,500 24 Main Auto Repair 8,500 23,750 13,000 150 428 Main Retail 5,500 28 Main Retail 5,500 438 Main Retail 2,550 38 Main Retail 2,550 440 Main Retail 2,500 40 Main Retail 2,500 504 Main Retail (4 du)6,300 504 Main Retail (4 du)6,300 01 Lake 405 Lake 407 Lake 409 Lake 421 Lake 427 Lake 431 Lake 435 Lake 437 Lake 43 Lake 505 Lake 201 Pecan 205 Pecan 209 Pecan Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (3 du) Res (1 du) Res (4 du) Res (4 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res 1 du TOTAL:32 250 24 01 Lake 405 Lake 07 Lake 09 Lake 21 Lake 27 Lake 31 Lake 35 Lake 37 Lake 443 Lake 505 Lake 201 Pecan 205 Pecan 209 Pecan TOTAL: Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (3 du) Res (1 du) Res (4 du) Res (4 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res (1 du) Res 1 du 32 250 24 TOTAL:23 750 13 000 150 Source: City of Huntington BeachDPMP Update - Oct 2000 BLOCK I Existing and Proposed Development PRE-DEVELOPMENT 1982)EXISTING/APPROVED DEVELOPMENT (2000)BUILDOUT (2005) ADDRESS USE SIZE PARKING NAME USE SIZE PARKING NAME RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE OTHER PARKING 520 Main Restaurant 5,280 520 Main Restaurant 5,280 5 280 522 Main Restaurant 2,666 522 Main Restaurant 2,666 2,666 526 Main Retail Res 3 du 2,500 526 Main Retail Res 3 du 2,500 2,500 538 Main Office 10,575 10 538 Main Office 10,575 10 10,575 Art Center 21 TOTAL:21 021 10 TOTAL:21 021 10 TOTAL:2 500 7 946 10 575 21 Source: City of Huntington BeachDPMP Update - Oct. 2000 APPENDIX B PARKING SURVEY FIGURE A SAMPLE USER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE PARKING SURVEY Serial# This survey is being conducted for the City of Huntington Beach and will be used to help improve the public parking facilities in the downtown area. This survey is anonymous, is not related to parking enforcement,and parking violations will not be reported. Please take a minute to answer the following questions and mail this post-paid card by SEPT, 1999. Thank you for your participation. 1. Approximately what time did you arrive in the downtown area today? 2. Approximately what time did you leave the downtown area today? 3 From where did you begin your trip to this area today? 1 Home 4 Hotel 2 Work 5 Other (Describe) 3 School What is the zip code of your beginning location? (Note: if zip code unknown, give city or region) 4. How often do you come to this area? 1 1-2 days per week 4 1-3 times per month 2 3-4 days per week 5 less than once a month 3 5 or more days per week 6 first time visitor 5 What was the primary purpose of your trip today? (mark all that apply) 1 Farmer's Market 7 Live in downtown area 2 Shopping 8 Employed in downtown area 3 Eating/Drinking 9 visiting area resident 4 Movie/Ente rtainment 10 visiting area business 5 Beach 11 (Describe) 6 Huntington Beach Pier 6. How many blocks did you have to walk from your parking space to your primary destination? 7. How many persons (including yourself) were in this vehicle when it was parked at this location? 8. Was your parking validated today? 1 Yes 9. How much are you willing to pay per hour to park in the downtown area? 2 No I F-1 Nothing 4 $1.00 to $2.00 per hour 2 less than $0.50 per hour ti 5 $2.00 to $3.00 per hour 3 $0.50 to $1.00 per hour 6 over $3.00 per hour 10. Do you have any comments or suggestions regarding the parking facilities in the downtown area? TABLE A INVENTORY OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES Block ION Description Address Name of Company Operating the Lot A Al Parking Lot 5th St A A2 Parking Lot 5th St A A3 Perking Lot Center Of Block Tenant Only A A4 Parking Lot Center Of Block Tenant Only/Main St Street Usage A AS Parking Lot Center Of Block Tenant Only EL Don Liquor A6 Parking Lot Walnut Av & City Owned 5th St A7 Parking Lot PCH B B3 Parking Lot Walnut Av Ace Parking Inc. / Plerside Parking C Cl Surf Museum Comer of Olive Parking Av & 5th St C C2 Private Lot Center Of Block Tenant C C3 Parting Lot Center Of Block NaiUBeauty Place D D2 Public Lot Walnut Av City Owned F Fl Parking Lot Orange Av Patient Parking 305 Orange Av F F2 Parking Lot Orange Av Tenant F F3 Parking Lot Orange Air HB reality F F4 Parking Lot Orange Air Making Waves F F5 Parking Lot Orange Air Restaurant F F6 Private Lot 3rd Lawyers, Men Styles. Hayes & Ass , Others Su G G1 Private Lot Center of Block Mixed Retail on Main St Street G G2 Private Lot Main St Auto Guy, Reel Estate. Barber, Others Su G G3 Private Lot Main St MLT Logistics Hl Ht Private Lot Pecan Ay Laundry Place Su Pu Su Su Su on Su Su Su Su Su Su Su Su Su Su Su Hl H2 Private Lot Main St Dirt Unused Parking Lot Su HI H3 Private Lot H2 H4 Private Lot H2 HS Private Lot Public Lot Main St & Sunni Electric Chair on Su Orange Av 8th St & Main Food Stuff Su St Main St & Retail Location Pecan Av Main St Art Center Parking Su Su 11 0 5 3 Hourly street clean, Valet AREA I 8a-12Mrd Permit Pr C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr C E T 15 min NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr St Pu C V E T Pr T NP-TenantOny Pr C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only St Pu C V E T Pr C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr C E T NP-Tenant/Customer Only Pr E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr C E T NP -Tenant/Customer Only Pr C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only St Pr C E T AREA 2 NP-Tenant /Customer Only C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pr C E T NP-Tenant Only T NP-Tenant /Customer Only C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Pu C V E T NP-Tenant /Visitor Only T T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Sunrise to 3a C E T NP-Tenant /Customer Only Monday-Saturday c $q- $100 per hr 52 00 per hr-$8 00 net 15 min Free, $1 00 pe 1/2 hr, $7 00 Flat a x 76 8 6 14 5 55 8 279 Comment 2 2 Permit Required 8 11 Tandom Spaces 5 11 X 4 816 10 4 Spaces unavailable 8 4 4 7 11 26 15 19 8 7 14 28 12 13 20 7 spaces, 3 spaces unavailable Under, Mixed-Use Development 1 I Sectioned off by ropes 2 2 1 Area 1 0 0 1347 0 20 Area 2 0 0 136 0 7 Total 0 0 1483 0 27 3 r > A Xmm g a mm a Z o v .11 Gm - -1-1.15101 9 0 TABLE B RESULTS OF PARKING UTILIZATION SURVEY - ALL SPACES FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24,1999 Invento TIME OF DAY gam-1 pm 900 AM 1000 AM 11.00 AM 1200 PM 1.00 PM 200 PM 300 PM 4 00 PM PAZ 8pm-12am 1 pm-7pm 7pm-8pm Occ. % Occ Doc % Occ Occ. % Occ Occ % Occ Occ % Occ. Occ % Occ Occ % Occ Doc. % Occ A 236 231 236 60 25% 74 31% 110 47% 127 54% 147 62% 163 69% 156 66% 135 57% B 317 317 317 58 18% 72 23% 87 27% 107 34% 112 35% 111 35% 120 38% 104 33% C 54 44 50 23 43% 28 52% 37 69% 38 70% 32 73% 30 68% 26 59% 33 751 D 862 846 846 240 28% 261 30% 287 33% 366 42% 387 46% 402 48% 424 50% 398 47% F 102 102 102 39 38% 54 53% 51 50% 54 53% 55 54% 55 54% 56 55% 64 63% AREA I TOTAL 1,571 1,540 1,551 420 27% 489 31% 672 36% 692 44% 733 48% 761 49% 782 51% 734 48% G 103 103 103 41 40% 47 46% 53 51% 54 52% 72 70% 78 76% 79 77% 78 76% H 153 153 153 32 21% 46 30% 53 35% 54 35% 58 38% 75 49% 73 48% 71 46% I 43 43 43 8 19% 17 40% 17 40% 18 42% 16 37% 16 37% 25 58% 22 51% AREA 2 TOTAL 299 299 299 81 27% 110 37% 123 41% 126 42% 146 49% 169 57% 177 59% 171 57% AREA I & 2 SUBTOTAL 1,870 1,839 1,850 501 27% 599 32% 695 37% 818 44% 879 48% 930 51% 959 52% 905 49%1 B1 20 20 20 5 25% 7 35% 7 35% 4 20% 6 30% 5 25% 6 30% 5 25%' Cl 43 43 43 17 40% 33 77% 33 77% 38 88% 42 98% 44 102% 44 102% 46 107% D1 39 39 39 5 13% 10 26% 12 31% 18 46% 21 54% 22 56% 22 56% 19 49%' D2 40 40 40 13 33% 13 33% 12 30% 13 33% 14 35% 13 33% 16 40% 15 38% El 46 46 46 24 52% 30 65% 35 76% 35 76% 36 78% 40 87% 42 91% 40 87%' Fl 42 42 42 11 26% 18 43% 14 33% 15 36% 18 43% 17 40% 17 40% 23 55% F2 18 18 18 3 17% 4 22% 5 28% 5 28% 6 33% 3 17% 3 17% 4 22% GI 71 71 71 26 37% 24 34% 19 27% 27 38% 29 41% 32 45% 32 45% 38 54% PERIPHERY TOTAL 319 319 319 104 33% 139 44% 137 43% 155 49% 172 54% 176 55% 182 57% 190 60% TOTAL AREA 2,189 2,158 2,169 605 28% 738 34% 832 38% 973 44% 1,051 49% 1,106 51% 1,141 53% 1.095 51% Invento TIME OF DAY gam-fpm 500 PM 600 PM 700 PM 800 PM 9.00 PM 10.00 PM 1100PM 1200 AM PAZ 8pm-12am 1 pm-7pm 7pm-8pm Dee % Doc Occ. % Occ Oec. % Occ. Occ % Dec Dec % Occ Occ. % Doc. Occ. % Dec Occ % Occ. ' A 236 231 236 132 56% 106 45% 117 50% 114 48% 133 56% 141 60% 110 47% 104 44%, B 317 317 317 86 27% 93 29% 123 39% 180 57% 144 45% 128 40% 96 30% 73 23%' C 54 44 50 34 77% 33 75% 36 72% 34 63% 30 56% 36 67% 26 48% 22 41%- D 862 846 846 419 50% 495 59% 507 60% 555 64% 595 69% 574 67% 406 47% 294 34%' F 102 102 102 58 57% 38 37% 42 41% 28 27% 34 33% 37 36% 50 49% 37 36% AREA 1 TOTAL 1,571 1,540 1,551 729 47% 765 60% 825 53% 911 58% 936 60% 916 58% 688 44% 530 34% G 103 103 103 84 82% 64 62% 47 46% 43 42% 31 30% 30 29% 18 17% 21 20%' H 153 153 153 61 40% 63 41% 55 36% 69 45% 65 42% 64 42% 48 31% 53 35%, 1 43 43 43 23 53% 32 74% 30 70% 31 72% 33 77% 29 67% 24 56% 24 56%' AREA 2 TOTAL 299 299 299 168 66% 159 63% 132 44% 143 48% 129 43% 123 41% 90 30% 98 33% AREA I & 2 SUBTOTAL 1,870 1,839 1,850 897 49% 924 60% 957 52% 1,054 66% 1,065 67% 1,039 56% 778 42% 628 34%' B1 20 20 20 7 35% 5 25% 7 35% 5 25% 10 50% 12 60% 9 45% 9 45%' Cl 43 43 43 45 105% 42 98% 40 93% 44 102% 39 91% 37 86% 31 72% 26 60% Dl 39 39 39 17 44% 23 59% 22 56% 26 67% 26 67% 27 69% 27 69% 27 69% D2 40 40 40 16 40% 15 38% 16 40% 18 45% 21 53% 21 53% 15 38% 21 53% El 46 46 46 45 98% 40 87% 38 83% 39 85% 40 87% 44 96% 35 76% 32 70% Fl 42 42 42 18 43% 21 50% 16 38% 21 50% 21 50% 25 60% 28 67% 29 69% F2 18 18 18 7 39% 7 39% 7 39% 8 44% 11 61% 6 33% 6 33% 5 28% G1 71 71 71 37 52% 40 56% 38 54% 40 56% 40 56% 40 56% 39 55% 40 56% PERIPHERY TOTAL 319 319 319 192 60% 193 61% 184 58% 201 63% 208 65% 212 66% 190 60% 189 59% TOTAL AREA 2,189 2,158 2,169 1,089 50% 1,117 52% 1.141 53% 1,255 57% 1,273 58% 1,251 57% 968 44%. 817 37% Vv'n :2D <NT O 2 m N N- xo O 0 W Dm D DDIVD r r Fp N p OD1 NI1 NIpp1 (I.1 ((m C- to N A tWD tail O O Ol N U tUD A N U 4 N HS t0 _- t0 N O1 O H W O IO Ol N -V ID' V N 8 L N P.7OVaa /pIpp NI1 pp 1 W OtD + O N 0 IWD W O OIpOI IJ cn ID A N OIOC I.N WOO N V V m U Ol V a V OD 0D U m U O (Nn V W 0 VIHi F 7K X X X XNX X X X X bC X X X XN u V O U W N U N O O) O N N U Ol LNi O VI Hqq 1pp ppl1 (V1 QXr rVU H N DI N 4al 01 W m lSX X X T £ X X X X XNX F 3 TX X X X X Xfff11110.1WV U H OI N O V t0 A U O tD N VNi OD N fJ A HWay - u N WX Xaaaa XXX X X X X X kaXXXnO + D) W O) U A U N t6 U A O O A i)) O' N W H01gN A OcQf V?Vn Q ._X X X X X X X X X X X 29 aR K x oTO O -N` O+ Ol IWO O N OVl N V J 01 U L NtN.lfaD'"H DD p w pXA Ol 1 l 141 O) U U f![{l1Tto a Ol V Q) A A NaX X X X Y X X X X dX X X X X X Xp r N g N W V W N N N N U QN O Ol U V V N O P ID U V U U 4411 Og G QX Vell 219, 98 1*, a, 3R le, er A! e 2-90ND V 0D N O 69 O m0 + U Cm O% Ol N H U% V C to 13pl01N H v ;I U N N Y 2- W VY N W EJ W W f5X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVR b O U tD N V W tD 100 100 01 W O U O 8 2 9 Or$a;a twEs t S?amVxD{ N-- 0 0 n m N- S 47 1 O n m D Dm D i A OIVY r rp p NI Oyu y Nyp (.t ( pIVO 10 + t0 N Ofa1WD W O O 01 N N IUD A N Of L H ONV aC m J m Na AtWD tJ O IO Oi N N IUD u fs H A Iii T,3V0b b+ U N 01 O tWD W O O 01 N N tUD A N O O N O UfCpp II N1 a J1 roNto A OI W - L W U V U A {n A A V f0 tJ + m VHO(,I /N t yy p (X TA u W 01 (Jpq N A Oi rWq 4i![(qCX a`4e a2 X X d X X X X X 7R 2C X X X X X d 2t NOm a A m 16) 'w o i v 1 16' °v t Io t to VS./ 8 O 'nN A A N W NX X29 OI V A OgX+ ryXO1UXOl WXA N NmyX X XX X XXX X0 F.(p( (.lNp N N N N WvO V ID Vf P W N N (J V 4! A Ol V b N fD a O/ J 3z mX HtC)yQ M;uX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X pJYI v U U V1 W U H a Ol V W+ W b V W m Ol NNtq Ip { QX8X X X X X X X aK X X X X ak^;;(Q,ap II1 ttIp0 I N I l0O N tD Ol fD OI P A N 01 OD 0 O t0 taD O m Of N Of WHDX'98 X X X X X X X X8X X X a XPRX arOmD OV1 N W V a W N U IJ 10.1 O IWD A IO N m O N H1,1 D_p p1 1p g mXN VV W UO NQ1 01Val N NAp W I UO v3X01X X X X X X X a X X X X a k a X XN N N W V N U N Ol O A U 8 6. 01 W V v fN/1 A Hvp1 0y1 q V V V UA fD (jtAX XXXakXX2 a' a XXa X XXX X X "u a w o In m $i InNa w °i Sd Si o'l rs "t3 f''.lHAQj1N N 0pl1AQO NlO CiIUQ. A m g;tqy N 8 3X a= XXXXXaXX X X aCXX X Xa-£, X Xcocoti O 4 TABLE D RESULTS OF PARKING UTILIZATION SURVEY - OFF-STREET SPACES FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 TIME OF DAY 9 00 AM 1000 AM 11.00 AM 12 00 PM 1 00 PM 2 00 PM 3 00 PM 4 00 PM PAZ Inventory Occ. % Occ Occ % Occ. Occ. % Occ Occ % Occ. Occ % Occ Occ % Occ Occ % Occ Occ % Occ A 176 30 17% 41 23% 74 42% 85 48% 111 63% 129 73%122 69%102 58% B 285 51 18% 63 22% 73 26% 91 32% 94 33% 89 31%95 33%81 28% C 20 5 25% 5 25% 9 45% 10 50% 10 50% 10 50%9 45%11 55% D 826 229 28% 242 29% 258 31% 340 41% 371 45% 384 46%407 49%382 46% F 60 26 43% 31 52% 29 48% 27 45% 27 45% 30 50%23 38%30 50% AREA I TOTAL 1,367 341 25% 382 28% 443 32% 553 40% 613 45% 642 47%656 48%606 44% G 44 14 32% 17 39% 16 36% 21 48% 23 52% 24 55%26 59%27 61% H 78 18 23% 19 24% 27 35% 23 29% 29 37% 36 46%37 47%40 51% I 21 4 19% 10 48% 6 29% 5 24% 6 29% 6 29%10 48%9 43% AREA 2 TOTAL 143 36 25% 46 32% 49 34% 49 34% 58 41% 66 46%73 51%76 53% TOTAL AREA 1,510 377 25% 428 28% 492 33% 602 40% 671 44% 708 47%729 48%682 45°%o 5 00 PM 6:00 PM 7 00 PM 8 00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12.00 AM PAZ Inventory Occ. % Occ. Occ. % Occ. Occ. % Occ. Occ. % Occ Occ. % Occ. Occ % Occ.Occ % Occ.Occ % Occ A 176 97 55% 71 40% 73 41% 71 40% 84 48% 88 50%72 41%66 38% B 285 66 23% 73 26% 100 35% 158 55% 121 42% 103 36%76 27%52 18% C 20 11 55% 10 50% 11 55% 8 40% 5 25% 11 55%8 40%6 30% D 826 402 49% 479 58% 489 59% 530 64% 561 68% 547 66%376 46%264 32% F 60 33 55% 20 33% 17 28% 14 23% 19 32% 16 27%28 47%22 37% AREA 1 TOTAL 1,367 609 45% 653 48% 690 50% 781 57% 790 58% 765 56%560 41%410 30% G 44 29 66% 22 50% 18 41% 13 30% 4 9% 5 11%1 2%1 2% H 78 33 42% 33 42% 25 32% 35 45% 28 36% 25 32%20 26%20 26% I 21 8 38% 14 67% 15 71% 16 76% 21 100% 15 71%8 38%8 38% AREA 2 TOTAL 143 70 49% 69 48% 58 41% 64 45% 53 37% 45 31%29 20%29 20% TOTAL AREA 1,510 679 45% 722 48% 748 50% 845 56% 843 56% 810 54%589 39%439 29% .. TABLE E RESULTS OF PARKING UTILIZATION 11V1 99 ALL SPACES SATURDAY, TIME OF DAY 1 00 PM 2 00 PM 3 00 PM 12.00 PM1100 AM % Occ900 AM 1000 AM o Occ Occ % Occ Occ!O oOCC. % OCC. Occ% Occcc°Occ Jo Occ.% Occ 2 64%130 55%.Inventory OccPAZ 0%123 52%134 57%15 A B C D F AREA 1 TOTAL G 236 56 317 38 54 28 862 270 102 29 1,571 421 103 36 41 24% 12% 52% 31% 28% 27% 35% 27% 78 33% 47 15% 37 69% 304 35% 44 43% 510 32% 47 46% 51 33% 94 4 58 18% 44 81% 417 48% 52 51% 665 42% 60 58% 61 40% 73 23% 41 76% 452 52% 50 49% 739 47% 71 69% 62 41% 77 24% 41 76% 478 55% 55 54% 785 50% 71 69% 76 50% 47% 75 40 492 63 822 69 82 18 24% 74% 57% 62% 52% 67% 54% 42% 84 41 522 69 846 66 91 31 261/. 76°! 61% 680/ 54e/ 64% 59°/ 72°/ H 153 19 44%19 44%20 63%1 43 13 90 30% 30% 24 56% 122 41%140 47%152 51%16T 56%169 57%1188 AREA 2 TOTAL 299 91 53%1034 55°i AREA 1&2 891 48%952 51%805 43% 9 SUBTOTAL 1,870 511 27% 20 2 10% 632 34% 3 15%16 80%10 500/0 11 55% 46 107% 15 75% 44 102% 16 60°%o 44 102°!0 81 41 95 %39 91%1 Cl D1 D2 43 36 84% 39 14 36% 40 14 35% 40 93% 17 44% 14 35% 24 62%26 67%24 21 53% 22 55% 21 43 93%42 62% 53% 91% 24 62% 18 45% 46 100% 25 64 19 480, 40 87% El Ft F2 G1 46 36 78% 42 27 64% 18 6 33% 71 35 49% 170 53% 40 87%40 87% 27 64%24 26 62%24 57% 5 28%3 17%5 28%9 47 66%46 37 521!0 42 59% 182 57%209 66%221 69%223 57% 50% 65% 70% 25 10 50 232 60% 56% 70% 73% 25 600. 10 56°. 52 73% 231 721/. rERIPHE RY TOTAL TOTAL AREA 319 2,189 681 31%814 37%1,014 46% 1,112 51% 1,175 54°/0 1,223 56%1,265 580. TIME OF DAY 00 PM 9 00 PM 10 00 PM PM 7 00 PM 8. 00 PM4 5 00 PM 6 00 % OOcc Ooc %Occ. Occ % Occ %Occ %Occ Occ /o Occ '%% Occ!OOcc OccO 29 55%130 55PAZInventorycc11047%124 53%1 A 236 125 53%125 53%116 49% 41%128 40%152 48%150 47% 82 26/026%97 31%98 31%129 56%34 63%26 48°% B 317 31 57%33 61%30 0 33 621544074%39 72%529 61%552 64%5 C 54154%505 59%472 55%4%42 41' 862 519 60%465 0 31/31%33 32%35 3 D F 102 72 71%52 51%47 46% a 32 776 0 49%844 640!0 902 57%881 56% AREA 1 TOTAL 1,571 838 53%778 50%797 51 k 050 43 4242%39 38%32 31%35 34' 41' G 103 69 67%65 63%51 /0%6 1 42%59 39%56 37%62 153 79 52%74 48%69 45 32 74%18 42%19 44%j H 91°1 35 81%36 W/o ` 3901 1 43 35 81%39 0 143 48h48%130 43%106 35%116 0 AREA 2 TOTAL 299 183 61%178 60%155 52% 3 AREA I & 2 51%919 49%974 52%1,008 54%997 5 SUBTOTAL 1,870 1,021 55%956 51%952 95%20 1000/01 81 20 13 65%10 50%11 55% 4%0 10 34 50% 79% 15 40 7 9 5% 3% 19 43 100%35 81 Cl 43 43 100%44 102%36 8 59%24 ° 62%25 64%26 67%26 67 1 D1 39 24 62%27 69%23 %19 48%17 43%19 48%17 !043 °/ D2 40 23 58%19 48%19 48 34 74%42 91%40 87%41 89 El 46 38 83%35 76%31 67% 5%26 62%24 57%24 57%23 55 Fl 42 21 50%19 45%19 4 %6 33%5 28%5 28%8 44 F2 18 9 50%6 33%6 33 2%48 68%39 55%39 55010 37 52% 71 57 80%49 69%44 6 65%215 67%207 65 PE G1 RIPHERY TOTAL 319 228 71%209 66%189 59%201 20763% i55% TOTAL AREA 2,189 1,249 57%1,165 53%1,141 52% 1,120 51%1,181 54%1,223 56% 1,204 1 R TABLE F1*RESULTS OF PARKING UTILIZATION SURVEY - ON-STREET SPACES SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11,1999 9.00 AM 1000 AM 11'00AM TIME OF DAY 1200 PM 100 PM 200 PM 300 PM PAZ Invento Dec.% Occ Occ.% Occ.Occ.% Occ Occ.% Occ Occ % Occ.Occ % Occ Occ.% Occ A 60 32 53%43 72%47 78%53 88%56 93%59 98%53 88% B 32 10 31%15 47%25 78%26 81%21 66%21 66%25 78% C 34 20 59%26 76%30 88%29 85%31 91%28 82%30 88% D 36 14 39%19 53%32 89%33 92%31 86%30 83%31 86% F 42 12 29%19 45%27 64%27 64%29 69%30 71%29 69% AREA 1 TOTAL 204 88 43%122 60%161 79%168 82%168 82%168 82%168 82% G 59 22 37%27 46%42 71%49 83%48 81%48 81%42 71% H 75 29 39%32 43%41 55%39 52%43 57%44 59%50 67% I 22 8 36%17 77%12 55%9 41%9 41%9 41%17 77% AREA 2 TOTAL 156 59 38%76 49%95 61%97 62%100 64%101 65%109 70% AREA 1 & 2 TOTAL 360 147 41%198 55%256 71%265 74%268 74%269 75%277 77% B1 20 2 10%3 15%16 80%10 50%11 55%15 75%16 80% CI 43 36 84%40 93%39 91%41 95%46 107%44 102%44 102% Dl 39 14 36%17 44%24 62%26 67%24 62%24 62%25 64% D2 40 14 35%14 35%21 53%22 55%21 53%18 45%19 48% El 46 36 78%40 87%40 87%43 93%42 91%46 100%40 87% Fl 42 27 64%26 62%24 57%27 64%24 57%25 60%25 60% F2 18 6 33%5 28%3 17%5 28%9 50%10 56%10 56% G1 71 35 49%37 52%42 59%47 66%46 65%50 70%52 73% PERIPHERY TOTAL 319 170 53%182 57%209 66%221 69%223 70%232 73%231 72% TOTAL AREA 679 317 47%380 56%465 68%486 72%491 72%501 74%508 75'/. 4:00 PM 500 PM 6.00 PM TIME OF DAY 7:00 PM 800 PM 900 PM 10.00 PM PAZ Invento Occ % Occ Occ.% Occ Dec.% Occ Occ % Occ Occ.% Occ.Occ % Occ Occ % Occ A 60 55 92%57 95%48 80%44 73%53 88%52 87%47 78% B 32 25 78%26 81%24 75%25 78%26 81%24 75%19 59% C 34 28 82%30 88%25 74%25 74%22 65%27 79%20 59% D 36 30 83%29 81%27 75%27 75%31 86%30 83%17 47% F 42 35 83%23 55%20 48%17 40%18 43%19 45%17 40% AREAITOTAL 204 173 85%165 81%144 71%138 68%150 74%152 75%120 59% G 59 47 80%41 69%32 54%31 53%32 54%27 46%30 51% H 75 44 59%39 52%32 43%35 47%32 43%33 44%38 51% I 22 16 73%19 86%16 73%16 73%16 73%11 50%11 50% AREA 2 TOTAL 156 107 69%99 63%80 61%82 63%80 51%71 46%79 51% AREA I & 2 TOTAL 360 280 78%264 73%224 62%220 61%230 64%223 62%199 55% B1 20 13 65%10 50%11 55%10 50%15 75%19 95%20 100% Cl 43 43 100%44 102%36 84%34 79%40 93%43 100%35 81% Dl 39 24 62%27 69%23 59%24 62%25 64%26 67%26 67% D2 40 23 58%19 48%19 48%19 48%17 43%19 48%17 43% El 46 38 83%35 76%31 67%34 74%42 91%40 87%41 89% Fl 42 21 50%19 45%19 45%26 62%24 57%24 57%23 55% F2 18 9 50%6 33%6 33%6 33%5 28%5 28%8 44% G1 71 57 80%49 69%44 62%48 68%39 55%39 55%37 52% PERIPHERY TOTAL 319 228 71%209 66%189 59%201 63%207 65%215 67%207 65% TOTAL AREA 679 608 75%473 70%413 61%421 62%437 64%438 65%406 60% TABLE G RESULTS OF PARKING UTILIZA i ION SURVEY - OFF-STREET SPACES SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1999 TIME OF DAY +I 900 AM 10.OOAM 1100AM 12'00 PM 100 PM 200 PM 300 PM PAZ Inventory Occ % Occ 0cc % Occ Occ. % Occ Occ. % Occ Occ % Occ 0cc % Occ 0a. % Occ A 176 24 14%35 20%47 27%70 40%78 44%93 53%77 44% B 285 28 10%32 11%33 12%47 16%56 20%54 19%59 21% C 20 8 40%11 55%14 70%12 60%10 50%12 60%11 55% D 826 256 31%285 35%385 47%419 51%447 54%462 56%491 59% F 60 17 28%25 42%25 42%23 38%26 43%33 55%40 67% AREA I TOTAL 1,367 333' 24%388 28%504 37%571 42%617 45%654 48%678 50% G 44 14 32%20 45%18 41%22 50%23 52%21 48%24 55% H 78 12 15%19 24%20 26%23 29%33 42%38 49%41 53% I 21 5 24%7 33%7 33%10 48%11 52%9 43%14 67% AREA 2 TOTAL 143 31 22%46 32%45 31%55 38%67 47%68 48%79 55% TOTAL AREA 1,510 364 24%434 29%549 36%626 41%684 45%722 48%757 50% TIME OF DAY 400 PM 500 PM 600 PM 700 PM 800PM 900 PM 1000 PM PAZ Inventory Occ % Occ Occ % Occ Occ % Occ Occ % Occ. Occ % Occ.Occ % Occ.Occ % Occ A 176 70 40%68 39%68 39%66 38%71 40%77 44%83 47% B 285 57 20%71 25%74 26%104 36%102 36%128 45%131 46% C 20 12 60%9 45%6 30%8 40%8 40%7 35%6 30% D 826 489 59%436 53%478 58%445 54%498 60%522 63%516 62% F 60 37 62%29 48%27 45%15 25%15 25%16 27%25 42% AREA 1 TOTAL 1,367 665 49%613 45%653 48%638 47%694 51%750 55%761 66% G 44 22 50%24 55%19 43%12 27%7 16%5 11%5 11% H 78 35 45%35 45%37 47%29 37%27 35%23 29%24 31% I 21 19 . 90%20 95%19 90%20 95%16 76%7 33%8 38% AREA 2 TOTAL 143 76 63%79 55%75 52%61 43%50 35%35 24%37 26% TOTAL AREA 1,510 741 49%692 46%728 48%699 46%744 49%785 52%798 53% f N1 75' 75' S 25 26 0 1115' PM 8-21 PM 8-39 24 -22 20 a 28 26 s 44 76'` 14 1J 76' Le ll2012 15 0 101 91 8 7 6 5 I Box 9I 28 MARCH ,1948 CNTY COAST 265 AC 17 41312 1061 1,a 117 5'N 0 1 RS35- 0 I-I I0 1 n n 25' 15' 13 75'117 5' 22 3 1175' 26 27 26 25 14 1075' 21----•a - 19 -..L_ 15 a 13 12 11 1075' 6.49 AC 14, HUNTINGTON BEACH MM 3-36 - I 60' "TRACT ,NO. 13722 'MAC 636-38 TO 4 1 7INC.- N 107, 22 21 6 25 17 7, ML 17 1175- 110'18,110 1174x 16 15L-- 13 PM 275-1 21 79' 75' lAJ °R1_ K... hcn- -103 12 25 11 -' AVENUE o n 3 105' NOTE --ASSESSORS BLOCK S PARCEL' NUMBERS SHOWN IN CIRCLES 22 20 18 16 a' 94 HIGHWAY THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPT. PURPOSES ONLY. THE ASSESSOR MAKES t'1O GUARANTEE 'AS TO, - ITS ACCURACY NOR ASSUMES ANY L1'8{LITY FOROTHER USES-'NOT TO 9E REPRO UCED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, © COPYRIGHT ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSOR 1994 0., 13722'r16' Jt76.' 28 10456' ' 1m=1001 ASSESSORS MAP BOOK 24 PAGE 15 COUNTY OF.,,ORANGE