HomeMy WebLinkAboutInitial Plan; Zoning Review IPZR2006004 - Supporting Documents0
City of Huntington Beach
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
Phone
Fax
536-5271
374-1540
374-1648
October 4, 2006
Michael C. Adams
21190 Beach Boulevard
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
SUBJECT: INITIAL PLAN ZONING REVIEW NO. 2006-004
Mixed Use Development or Residential Only Development
402 Seventeenth Street
Dear Mr. Adams:
Planning staff has reviewed your letter submitted on August 15, 2006, for a proposal to
develop the subject site with the following options:
1. A mixed-use development consisting of commercial businesses and residential uses.
2. A residential development consisting of single-family dwellings or condominiums.
Based on this review, the following analysis is provided:
Option 1-Mixed-Use Development
Based on the existing General Plan designation (CN-F1-d-Neighborhood Commercial-
0.35 FAR-Design Overlay), Zoning (CG-General Commercial), and the surrounding
development pattern and predominate residential land uses, staff believes a vertical mixed-
use concept could be an appropriate land use at this location. The mixed-use concept
would have neighborhood serving commercial uses on the ground floor and a residential
component above. In this instance, staff believes the retention of the neighborhood-serving
commercial use is an important and overriding land use for the area.
The objective of maintaining commercial uses is to provide for the continuation of existing
retail and service commercial uses that are oriented to the needs of local residents. The
mixed-use concept would enable residents to live in proximity to their jobs, commercial
services, and reduce the need for automobile use. The retention of the commercial
component would also continue to serve the overall area that is predominately residential.
The determination on this type of mixed-use land use is based on ensuring compatibility
between commercial and residential uses. In a vertical mixed-use project, design elements
could be integrated to create visual and physical separation and mitigate potential conflicts
between commercial and residential uses.
IPZR NO. 06-04: 402 SeventeS Street
October 4, 2006
Page 2 of 2
0
However, the existing General Plan (CN-F1-d) and Zoning (CG) designations would have to
be amended to allow this type of land use and development. Also, please note that the City
currently does not have a mixed-use zoning classification to permit this type of
development. This type of zoning designation with applicable development regulations
would have to be prepared as part of a zoning text amendment. I have attached a list of
necessary entitlements required for implementation of Option 1 (see attached).
Option 2-Residential Only Development
Based on the existing General Plan designation (CN-F1-d), Zoning (CG), and the
surrounding development pattern and land uses, staff believes the removal of the
neighborhood-serving commercial land use designation, to permit residential only, would not
be an appropriate land use at this location. As noted in the comments above, the goal of
the General Plan land use designation of neighborhood-serving commercial is to maintain
and develop a diversity of retail and service commercial uses that are oriented to the needs
of local residents. The possible removal of this designation to permit residential only will not
meet that goal and furthermore would remove existing uses that serve the surrounding
residents and area. Staff believes that it is important to continue commercial uses in areas
designated on the General Plan Land Use Map and can serve an area that is predominately
residential. Preserving commercial uses at this location and retaining a diversity of land
uses to a larger extent enhances the City's economic viability and fiscal stability.
To permit residential only, the existing General Plan (CN-F1-d) and Zoning (CG)
designations would have to be amended to allow a residential land use and development. I
have attached a list of necessary entitlements required for implementation of Option 2 (see
attached).
The comments provided in this letter reflect a preliminary Planning Department review only
and should be considered in that context. Please note that the proposed options are
subject to discretionary action by the Planning Commission and City Council and may be
approved, conditionally approved, or denied with findings based on a complete analysis and
environmental review. For more information regarding fees and entitlements, please refer
to the attached enclosure. Please call me at (714) 374-1744 if you have any questions
regarding the information in this letter.
Sincerely,
f
TESS NGUYEN
Associate Planner
Enclosure
copy: Herb Fauland - Acting Planning Manager
Chuck and Wanda Robison
Project File
INITIAL PLAN ZONING REVIEW NO. 2006-004
Mixed Use Development Residential Development
402 Seventeenth Street
OPTION 1: A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
1.Required Entitlements
The following entitlements are required to implement a vertical integration mixed use
development. These entitlements require review and recommendation by the Planning
Commission to the City Council.
Entitlement Fee Request
General Plan Amendment $32,948 To change the General Plan designation
Zoning Text Amendment $15,178
from CN-F1-d to a mixed-use designation.
To establish mixed-use regulations.
Zoning Map Amendment $19,271 To change the zoning from General
Environmental Review TBD
Commercial to a zone that allows mixed-
use.
Depends on the scope of the project.
The following entitlements can be processed concurrently with the General Plan Amendment,
Zoning Text Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment. These entitlements require review by the
Planning Commission only.
Entitlement Fee Request
Conditional Use Permit $20,153 To permit the construction of a vertically
integrated mixed-use development with
neighborhood serving commercial uses.
Tentative Tract Map $21,150
+ $30/lot
To subdivide land for condominiums.
Environmental Review TBD Depends on the scope of the project.
2. Design Recommendations - Urban Design Guidelines
Please refer to the Design Guidelines for Mixed Use Projects in Section H of Chapter 6 of the
City of Huntington Beach Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines is on the city's website at
htt ://www.surfcit -hb.or /cit de artments/ lannin /desi n.
3. Processing Time
The processing of the above entitlements would take approximately 8-12 months from date of
submittal to date of action by the City. Staff recommends that the applicant/property owner
conduct public meeting(s) with the surrounding property owners and residents to discuss the
proposal prior to or early in the entitlement process.
Page 1 of 2
OPTION 2: A RESIDENTIAL ONLY DEVELOPMENT
1. Required Entitlements
The following entitlements are required to implement a residential only development. These
entitlements require review and recommendation by the Planning Commission to the City
Council.
Entitlement Fee Request
General Plan Amendment $32,948 To change the General Plan designation
from CN-F1-d to a residential designation.
Zoning Map Amendment $19,271 To change the zoning from General
Commercial to a residential zone.
Environmental Review TBD Depends on the scope of the project.
The following entitlements can be processed concurrently with the General Plan Amendment
and Zoning Map Amendment. These entitlements require review by the Planning Commission
only.
Entitlement Fee Request
Conditional Use Permit $20,153 To permit the construction of a residential
development.
Tentative Tract Map $21,150
+ $30/lot
To subdivide land for single family
dwellings or condominiums.
Environmental Review TBD Depends on the scope of the project.
2. Design Recommendations - Urban Design Guidelines
Please refer to the Design Guidelines for Single Family (Chapter 2) and Multi-Family
Residential (Chapter 3) of the' City of Huntington Beach Design Guidelines. The Design
Guidelines is on the city's website at htt ://www.surfcit -
hb.or /cit de artments/ lannin /desi n.
3. Processing Time
The processing of the above entitlements would take approximately 8-12 months from date of
submittal to date of action by the City. Staff recommends that the applicant/property owner
conduct public meeting(s) with the surrounding property owners and residents to discuss the
proposal prior to or early in the entitlement process.
Page 2 of 2
402 SEVENTEENTH STREET
APPLICATION: Initial Plan Zoning Review IPZR No. 06-04
(Mixed Use Development or Residential Development)
DATE OF SUBMITTAL: August 15, 2006
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OWNER:
REQUEST:
Michael Adams
21190 Beach Boulevard
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Chuck and Wanda Robison
40217 th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
To develop:
1. a mixed-use development consisting of commercial businesses
and residential uses
or
2. a residential development consisting of single-family dwellings
or condominiums
PROJECT LOCATION: 402 Seventeenth Street
(corner of Seventeenth Street & Orange Avenue)
GENERAL PLAN:
ZONING:
CN-F1-d (Neighborhood Commercial - 0.35 Floor Area Ratio -
Design Overlay)
No residential uses (SFDs or condos) are allowed
Small-scale neighborhood serving commercial uses only
CG (General Commercial)
No residential uses (SFDs or condos) are allowed
REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS: General Plan Amendment (Major-Map)-Planning Commission
Application Fee $32,948
from CN-F1-d to a mixed use designation
Zoning Text Amendment-Planning Commission
Application Fee $15,178
to establish a mixed use regulations
Zoning Map Amendment-Planning Commission
Application Fee $19,271
from General Commercial zone to a zone that allows mixed use
Page 1 of 2
0
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL:
CODE REQUIREMENTS:
PLAN CORRECTIONS:
URBAN DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS:
ISSUES:
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
•
402 SEVENTEENTH STREET
If the GPA ZTA and ZMA are a roved then roceed to:
Conditional Use Permit-Planning Commission
Application Fee $20,153 (mixed use, '/ block or greater)
Tentative Tract Map-Planning Commission
Application Fee $21,150 + 30/lot
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
The propose uses are not allowed per General Plan and Zoning.
A vertical integration mixed-use development with neighborhood
serving commercial uses only.
Page 2 of 2
• 4i -I1oAsty
WhQ- f LAki C /N F i
4 0,2h°1
x
110 y-e .
. m fixed-(iL,,-&(o r wue-k
GvyV l W. r,i 4 tt c, -e s S
I"e Sri -ems,-Ise,( w sF D yr C,aL S
?VMT-"1-1, 2-1 1
6tv,oJ PL';kri
tnJov 32,15
0
SEE SPECIAL PACE 23-159 FOR SUBSURFACE FEE TITLE ASSESSMENT
u•
3 PECAN
34
na 30 z4 7J 37 '
t. Q ? 28 is 27
5.2536
33 22 21
•BLK 28 12 11 17418-
k 29 to 9 16
i8W7 11
32 20 19 19
N
ti
N
23 Is jr 22
24 16 5 15 21
27 74
13
18
C 6 5 13
i:4 3 14
,,.15 n ^".
x ORANGE
4,44w jp1 y. P7
5 °S
22 t1`.
A s•I 25 •21 ,,,•
fYt01 897-R ' 2 Irs 2J 27 -w
19 , 28
23 ns
W
16 24
i 6 1 c
4 14 3 ns•
n,
it, 897-1412,4
€8LK 15_ , c 20
7 17 °s
14 r.. 5 18 „
,,26 JF 12--^
,y'•s ,w 25 1 it RM108,49 b:
OUVE
---- -1 1
MARCH 1948
rr
----fo-----
B 17 -V
CLY-- --------4
zlls• l it
m.sr 24 28's 76
23 n,.sr '6
is 25 26 25'22,
us'a 26 24 L+ 25•19
ans.w.27
(VA6YXLG AYEJ
22
IS' 1.'a Y0 ).
,c 20
8 - I 7 - 18 v 1;71 =
ur•;- - - kr6
BLK 31 12
30 10 ,a 9 14nrsra
urx 5 8 7 • P. 168
6 6 5 IS ,n.
NTEE T 3 S .
28 29 n. ic2 ,. 1 is • 16 ;
M.MTINGTON BEACH
MANTAVGTON BIEAL71 SEVENTEENTH ST. SEC
16 1
ALA E 3-38
ALM 4-10
W
M
h
r
ti
A VENLE t
w O r4,
! ---28 7 C
---- 26 25 ItV '"
24 23
22 L 21 8 3 „'ISVs
- i- 20 's l9 11 s r:
18 17 12
_ +1
BLK__ 12
--- 10 9
-_8, 7W
-----6,+5
is
at 5 14 ,,,.
2 r 7 13 „s.
>r R28 27 k
- 10-_26 25
24 23
ar a22 21
19
18
17
16
BLK. 15
14
13
20 19
to
r5 ---8
13
u
50 9
415
B 7
- 20 6 5
us
4aJ 22
yd` = 2 1 21
A VEM,E' r;
20
T
19 22
i.w 21
ns 18M,2
nvso I 1' `lnrsr
113•
2
ns
27 k 4'
W
22,14 1 • ,,s.
15 16
15 15
9 416rf
10
19
-`J-1-
M, 14
RBLK
r
• 1 9 _316
"Las'
us
n•
7 •v us
6 M 5
a 2 is 4ss•
' 4,
w
X 28 w via 21 Iw•',
x•m 15 26 25•20
-- '21 tu 23• 17
16 •22 21'18
20 19-J--•
-t4 18 f7 •rs•H.w
, 13'sa
12 11
BLK. ,p "9 11r,J
8 ne 7 10 M.w•
6 -W
a n R34'- - - }I2 1 a.+N us ats• st ss•
NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK Q
PARCEL NUMBERS
SHOWN IN CIRCLES
AVEME
L
ti
rr
ASSESSOR'S MAP
BOOK 023 PAGE 15
COUNTY OF ORANGE
023-15
II
1