The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLocal Coastal Program Amendment LCPA1992002 - Supporting DocumentsCASH RECEIPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH 9ECEIVED FROM ADDRESS FOR RECEIVED BY CIT)T OF hUNTINCTON 13EACI7 Address All Correspondence To. P.O. BOX ISO OR CALL BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92648 CALL (714) 536-5241 „`/"..fy'7 /BSrORDATE rP TR FUND ACCOUNT DEPT. DIV. R AA 3-01-00 CD 234 R AA 3-u6-00 CD 234 R AA 7-05-00 CD 234 R AA 3-07-00 CD 234 R AA 3-08-00 CD 234 R AA 3-09-00 CD 234 R AA 3-15-00 CD 234 R SK 3-55-00 CD 234 R AA 7-11-00 CD 234 R AA 3-11-00 PW 411 R AA 7-24-00 PW 411 R AA 7-19-00 CD 234 R AA 7-01-00 CD 231 R SK 3-14-00 CD G AA 2-01-16 00 000 loll CASH CHECK DESCRIPTION BUSINESS LICENSE BUILDING PERMITS PLAN CHECK FEES PLUMBING PERMITS ELECTRICAL PERMITS HEATING PERMITS POOL PERMITS PARK & REC (UNIT LOT FEE) LIBRARY FEES (CELF) GRADING PERMITS GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ZONING APPLICATIONS PARK & REG (SUBDIV. LICENSE) SMIP OTHER OTHER AMOUNT 3037/54 6Feb92 001/10 $1500.00 0_VEL0PI1ENTSVC No.CD 2891.72 A Building Planning Housing 536-5241 536-5271 536-5271 November 12, 1992 CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE"L'PMENT Charles Damm South Coast District Director California Coastal Commission 245 W. Broadway , Suite 380 Long Beach , CA 90802 NOV,1.31992 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOIJTI4 COAST DISTRICT Subject: CITY OF HUNTT "IGTON BEACH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 2-92 Dear Mr. Datum: Staff has received the Coastal Commission staff report dated November 3, 1992 which analyzes City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 2-92. Staff supports the staff recommendation to certify the Implementation Plan Amendment as submitted. Thank you for your diligence in this application and should you have any questions , do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 576-5571. Siprely, Robert L. Franklin Associate Planner RLF: lp (5080d) City of H untingt o n Beach t Coastal Comission Procedures for Permits and A eels Because the State Coastal Commission now isasuea all coastal permits for areas without LCPs, it has developed new, streamlined procedures for considering these permits. Appli- cants ahonid submit their permit applications at the appropriate office. Because regional cc issions no longer exist. the state c ammissirnis vprkload has increased tremendously. The fellewing procedures ere intended to speed up the process without nerlectins important coastal issues. IF YOU ARE A.2' APPLlCAlT: In most cases , your , application will be reviewed by the distri'ct' staf f and placed on the state cos3s:riscion agenda foz the earliest possible meeting. ftaff will determine if tlhe'epplieation can be put on either the consent or administrative ealesidar or whether it must receive a full public hearin.:. 9sv1F7r.T&ATTV£ CALMAR: Administrative permits may be granted by the execut ive 44reetor for -projects which are minDr new developments. additions to existing structures (not exceeding 5,00,000 in cost), single family residences, or multi-family projects of four units or less The Coastal Act requires that all administrative permits be reported to the Caw-44r? r at its next nbsting before they take effect. Administrative permits will be reoorted on the administrative calendar. If four or more cossmsissioners request that an item be held for public hearing, the project sill be removed from the administrative calendar and scheduled for a public hearing and possible vote at the next regular ce - nisssion meeting. Conditions, may be attached to an administrative permit. Applicants and other interested parties may speak in opposition to the pr',ject or its conditions. Testimony is limited to 3 minutes for each side. COASEN'T CALENDAR: Projects considered by staff to be c^naiatent with the Coastal Act but which do not qualify for the administrative calendar sway be placed an the consent calendar. Projects on the consent calendar will be approved by the co=ission with a single vote for the entire calendar. if three or more com. isaioners with to pull an item off consent, that item will normally be rescheduled for a regular public hearing and possible vote at the next regular ee ission meeting. Conditions way be attached to consent calendar permits. Applicants who accept these conditions need not speak. Opponents should tell the co=ission why the project is inconsistent with the Coastal Act. Three minutes will be alloyed for each side to s eak to the cer=ission. If there are several-persons wishing- to address an itct , efforts should be made to eonsoliie to pre- sentations in order to stay within the time-limits. Interested persons should check with the commission staff regarding subsequent hearings. REC.°L*ZCALM AR I'ET Tfl' A?PL7CATIONS : Projects potentir .11y inconsistent with the Coastal Act or which can be approved only with conditions for which there are no clear precedents will be pieced on the regular calendar and will be considered after i full public hearing. Persons supporting or opposing the project should tell the commission why .they think the project is or is not consistent with the Act . Testimony nest address coastal act policies and environmental Impact& of the project and should not be redundant. F.®ch side is allotted 10 minutes, with the applicant apeakin? 'irst and then the opposition. Spoken rebuttal is not allowed, but written rebuttal or other pertinent material may be submitted to the staff following the hearing. Projects on the regular calendar will normally be scheduled for continued bearing and voting at the neat regular a iasion neetisg. - On acre projects, the staff may have enough Information to sake a preliminary r ecommen- dation for approval after the public bearing; bas been be?,d. In that ease, the commission nay vote that day and not postpone the decision. When ,n staff recommendation ws'presented to the cennission ,-both the applicant and opponents have five minutes each to comment on the recommendat i ons. After the hearing is closed , the commission will discuss the matter and vote. e3- I3Enl'ES7 FOR AECONSIDEPAT10PM. An applicant may -.*quest that ie eamission reconsider lts previous action on a it. The applicant asst show that there is relevant new evidence which could not have reasonably been presented at the original bearing or that an error of fact or Ira occurred. C ly the applicant and persons who participated to the briginal proceedings are eligible to testify. Testimony Is limited to three minutes for each side. Should the c iesioners vote to grant the reconsideration request,the matter will be scheduled for a public hearing as if It were a new application. ?ER%IIT A?? 'D`?EATS: An applicant any apply for an amendment to a previously approved project. The amendment will be scheduled for a public hearing and any person any speak in support of or opposition to the amendment. Five minutes will be allotted to each side. ?BLIC BEARING PROCEDURES : If the item you are interested in Speaking an Ss scheduled for a public searing, you must Lill out a "'Request to Speak" form and give it to a' staff person before the hearing starts. Sign-up forms will be available on a table at the back of the hearing roam. lime limits for spoken testimony vary according to the three different Calendars. 9eeause of this linited time, applicants and opponents are encouraged to submit written comments to the eo=ission office at least one week in advance of the hearing. Cc+®enta of up to two pages will be copied and forwarded to the cc=issioners by the staff. If you wish to otibmit lengthy co=ents , you must submit 20 copies to the con fission office at least one week before the hearing. 3f it is convenient, you may also wish to bring 20 copies of your spoken testimony to the hearing fo.: distribution to the commissioners. Speakers may use maps, slides, photographs, models, sad other visual materials in their presentations to the ca-ission . Since such materials become part of the public record on the permit, reproductions of the materials shown must be submitted to the crnaissior staff before or during the co:^nission meeting, or the criminals will be retained by the coeission for 60 days. A carousel slide projector and screen will be available at the eetings. ' TTZ\ t, 'ILL AN AGENDA IMi BE BEARD: Unfortunately , no one can predict how quickly the Commission will complete agenda items. Each session begins at the time noted on the meet- ing notice. Each item is considered in the order listed, except In extraordinary cir- e=stances . The Cobs;ion Will consider an item even though the interested persons are not present. Staff at the appropriate commission office can give you sore information prior to the hearing date and you can call the staff at the bearing location for last- minute information. CA`PAIC?t CO Rl3rTioNS : To ensure the integrity of the permit process, the Coastal Ca- mission has adopted regulations (Sections 23025.1 and 23043) prohibiting a Ce missioner Srcm voting on a permit matter if be or she has r eceived a campaign contribution from an interested party. If you intend to speak on a permit matter, please indicate on your speaker alp and/or in your testimony, If you have made campaign contributions in excess of $100 to ,any Commissioner within the l ast year , and If ao, to which Commissioner you can- tributed. 'HOP fliAN VOTRS DO.".o IT TAKE TO A PROD AN APPLICATION ? Each permit east be app70 °as3 by a majority of the commissioners who are authorised to vote ash vbo.are rep sent .in the room. All permits on the consent calendar will be voted up= at one time with just one notion and co roll Call. T°DBL?C RECORDS: Public records an matters before the e omisssion will be available for inspection at the meeting and at other ti8les in the co®mission office . Zatra Copies of staff reports will also be available at the meeting. ACCESS To NLOINCS: CC®isaion meetings are in centralised locations and are accessibleto persons With dime;: slides. -ALA City of Huntington B each 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building 536-5241 Planning 536-5271 Housing 56-5271 October 26, 1992 Meg Vaughn California Coastal Commission South Coast Area 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380 Long Beach, CA 90802-4416 Subject: AMENDMENT 2-`'2 TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Dear Meg: I- G-, L h V, Es ( ^i % 99 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION UTHCOAST DISTRICT The following is an item analysis to the letter dated October 16, 1992 which indicates an inconsistency between the City's certified land use designation of Low Density-Residential and the proposed zone change from R2-PD-O-CZ to ROS-O-CZ: 1. On page 100 of the Coastal Element (see attachment 1), which is the City's Coastal Land Use Plan, Section 9.2.1 states "All of the following residential designations also allow certain support uses by special permit: elementary and private schools, neighborhood parks and rivate re reation areas..." Since this section states that private recreation areas are permitted in residential land use designations, the proposed zone change from R2-PD-O-CZ to ROS-O-C: is in conformance with the City's Certified Land Use Plan and would not create an inconsistency between the proposed zoning and existing land use designation. 2. As stated in the City's transmittal dated September 15, 1992, the adopted provisions contained in the City's General Plan do not require an amendment to the Land Use Plan the parcel is less than 20 acres. The Size Criteria for Determining Land Use Designations table on Page 109 (see attachment 2) of the City's General Plan indicates only parcels 20 acres or more in size need an amendment to the City's Land Use Plan. Since the Coastal Land Use Plan is a portion at the City-wide land use plan, an amendment is not required. Meg Vaughn Page Two 3. On page 144 of the City's adopted General Plan (see attachment 3) ROS zoning is clearly consistent with all, residential zoning classifications therefore an amendment is not necessary. Since the Coastal Element and Coastal Land Use Plan are a part of the City's overall General Plan, the City has demonstrated internal consistency between the existing Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential and the proposed zoning classification of ROS (Recreation Open Space). 4. Also, the proposed zone change is consistent with the existing use of the property. The current use of the property is the tennis courts for the Seacliff Country Club. Since the Country Club is a permitted recreational use, the rezoning of the parcel to ROS-O-CZ recognizes the existing use of the parcel. In fact, the rezone will guarantee the continued recreational use of the parcel. In summary, staff feels that the rezone request from R2-PD-0-CZ to ROS-O-CZ has been processed properly and is consistent with the adopted policies of the City's General Plan and Certified Local Coastal Program. The City's Coastal Element states that recreation used are consistent with all residential land use categories therefore internal consistency has been achieved. Staff also maintains that since the Coastal Element is a part of the City's General Plan, the rezone request is consistent with the existing Coastal Land Use Plan. Based on this information, staff recommends that the rezone request be supported and approved by the California Coastal Commission at the November meeting in Santa Monica. Robert L.- Franklin Associate Planner 1 ,w. 9.2 LAND USE CATEGORIES The land use plan utilizes the same designations currently found in the Land Use Element, as well as six new or revised designations which more specifically reflect intended coastal land uses . This section describes the various categories and briefly discusses their relationship within the coastal zone. The general height limit for all categories of development is three stories. In specified areas , bonuses for parcels of one half block or more may be granted provided that the following conditions are met: 1. The bulk and siting of structures shall be controlled to protect public access and scenic and visual resources. A number of approaches may be used to achieve this, such as a step approach to building heights, staggered building envelopes, limits on the site coverage and building orientation, and use of view corridors. 2. Adequate parking shall be provided. Areas where increased intensities may be granted are depicted in Figure 9.8 on page 123. 9.2.1 Residential Residential uses are planned for approximately 1,600 acres of the coastal zone to provide opportunities for people to live near the coast. A range of allowable residential densities is proposed in keeping with the City's goal to provide a variety of housing opportunities by type, tenure, and cost for households of all sizes throughout the City. All of the following residential desi nations also allow certain sup ort uses by specie permit: a emertary a private schools, neighbor o pa s a rivate recreation areas, churches , fire stations , utility substations , day care centers, and convenience commercial centers (less than 1.5 'acres in size). Low Density - The low density designation is intended to provide the lowest intensity of residential development in the coastal zone and is applied to areas where residential uses currently exist or are planned to be developed at an intensity of less then seven dwelling units per gross acre of land . Principal uses permitted under the low density residential designation include detached single family dwellings, condominiums, and mobile home parks. Primary areas for low density include sites bounded by arterial highways and conveniently served by nearby elementary schools, commercial development and park and recreation areas. Medium Densit - This designation provides for more intense housing development and allows a density range of seven to 15 dwelling units per. gross acre of land . Principal uses include condominiums , single family dwellings in small lot areas , small multiple -family apartments (2-4 units), and motile home parks . Medium density residential uses are located convenient to schools, parks , shopping areas , and primary transportation routes, and may act as buffers or transitions between low and higher density residential areas and between residential and more intense non-residential uses. 100 ATTACHMENT NO.-4 SIZE CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS LAND USE CATEGORY CRITERIA* Residential Estate 1 acre or more Low Density 1 acre or more Medium Density 1'acre or more High Density 1 acre or more Commercial General Office -Professional Mixed Development Industrial General Public Uses Public, Quasi-Public, Institutional Open Space Planning Units 1; acres or more 10 acres or more 1' acres or more 1Z acres or more 20 acres or more (A) For parks --coamunity parks, Huntington Central Park or 20 acres of mire. (B) All others - 20 acres or sore Planned Community 50 acres or more Planning Reserve Other Uses Any size 20 acres or more *If a land use does not meet the criteria, a designation more ap- propriate to the character of the area will be assigned. The criteria should be applied flexibly since determination of the character of an area is the overriding issue. ATTACHMENT NQ. Figure 3-15 109 Z0l --wLAND USEigZ zCATEGORIES O 0 FA1.0 RESIDENTIAL1.1 ESTATE1.2 LOW DENSITY1.3 MEDIUM DENSITY1.4 MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY13 HIGH DENSITY2.0 COMMERCIAL2.IGENERAL2.2OFFFICE PROFESSIONAL2.3MIXED DEVELOPMENT3.0INOUSTRIAL3,1GENERAL4.0 PUBLIC USE4.1 PUB., QUASI-PUB., INSTIT.4.20PEN SPACE5.0 PLANNING UNITS5.1 PLANNED COMMUNITY5.2 PLANNING RESERVE6,0 OTHER6.1 RESOURCE PRODUCTIONuu13u000NFig- 4-1Gmeislencv with the land Use ElemuilHUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIFZONING AND LAND USE ELEMENTmay also be determined by reference toPLANNING DIVISIONsiu and,localional criteria.CONSISTENCY MATRIXATTACHMENT NO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST AREA 245 W. BROADWAY, STE. 380 P.O. BOX 1450 LONG BEACH, CA 90802-4416 (310) 59).507'l October 16, 1992 Mike Adams Director of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PETE WILSON, Governor Re: Amendment 2-92 to the City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program (Zone Change 90-12 and Zone Change 92-1) Dear Mr. Adams, This office received several items representing the above-described request on September 16, 1992. Pursuant to Section 13553 of the California Code of Regulations, the Executive Director has ten working days to review a submittal to determine whether it is in proper order and legally adequate to comply with the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 30510(b). As the tenth working day has passed, the application is considered complete. Therefore, as of September 30, 1992, this item is deemed properly submitted. For future reference, this item has been assigned the following title: Amendment 2-92 to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program. The submittal involves an amendment to the Implementation Plan portion of the Local Coastal Program; the amendment has been classified as a major amendment. As a major amendment, the Coastal Commission has 90 days to review a land use plz;n revision or 60 days to review an implementation plan modification. Therefore, the amendment has been tentatively scheduled for Commission review at its November 17-20, 1992 meeting in Santa Monica. Once the acitual agenda is set for the meeting, you will receive a more specific notice for the time and date of the public hearing. Although the ten working day review period has passed, some questions concerning the amendment request have arisen. The request is for three zone changes. Our records indicate that two of the proposed changes would bring the Implementation Plan into conformance with the certified Land Use Plan. However, one proposed change would create an inconsistency between the LUP and the IP. This conflict would result from zone change 92-1, parcel A. The proposed change from R-2-PD-O-CZ to ROS-O-C7 would be inconsistent with the certified land use designation of Residential Low Density. Page Two LCP Amendment 2-92 As the standard of review for amendments to an Implementation Plan is consistency with and adequacy to carry out the certified Land Use Plan, this portion of zone change 92-1 would have to be recommended for denial. An amendment to the Land Use Plan would have to be approved by the Coastal Commission for the site before the proposed change to the IP could take place. Any further information the City Planning staff could provide regarding the LUP land use designation of-parcel A would be helpful in our analysis of the amendment request. This office will keep you informed as we continue our review on this amendment request. The planner who will be reviewing this item is Meg Vaughn. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Teresa Henry Assistant District Director 6389E City of Huntin gton Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 926/48 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building 536-5241 Planning 536-5271 Housing 536-5271 September 15, 1992 Charles Damm South Coast District Director California Coastal Commission 245 W. Broadway, Suite 360 Long Beach, CA 90802 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMIG5lOi; SOUTH ""MST DISTRICT Subject: HUNTINGTON BEACH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 92-2 Dear Mr. Damn: The City of Huntington Beach is transmitting Local Costal Program Amendment (LCPA) No. 92-2 pursuant to City Council Resolution 17o. 6404. LCPA No. 92-2 is a request to amend the City's Certified Local Coastal Program resulting from the adoption of Zone Change no. 90-12 and Zone Change No. 92-1. Pursuant to Section 13551(a) of Article 15 of-the California Coastal Commission Regulations, Resolution No. 6404 was adopted by the City Council on July 20, 1992. A copy of Resolution No. 6404 is included in this transmittal. In addition, the City Council has requested that LCPA No. 92-2 take effect automatically upon Coastal Commission approval. The following is a summary of processing pursuant to Section 13552 (b)(c) of the Coastal Regulations concerning Local Coastal Program Amendment 92-2 and the relationship to other sections of the City's Certified Local Coastal Program. Zone Chan e No. 90-12 • On August 16, 1990 , 'Pacific Coast Homes submitted a Zone Change application to change the zoning on 1.76 acre parcel from R2-PD-01-CZ (Medium Density Residential-Planned Development-Oil Production-Coastal Zone) to R1-01-CZ (Low Density Residential-Oil Production-Coastal Zone). 1:-,_- r,4t&- .4 September 15, 1992 Page 2 On January 28, 1992, the Planning Commission approved Zone Change No. 90-12 and recommended approval to the City Council. On June 15, 1992, the City Council approved Zone Change No. 90-12. During all the public hearings, no coastal concerns were raised. • The City Council retained the Coastal zone suffix which will require a Coastal Development Permit prior to issuance of building permits for permanent structures. Zone Chance No. 92-1: • On January 21, 1992, Pacific Coast Homes submitted a zone change to change the zoning on two (2) parcels in the Coastal Zone. Parcel Acreage Former New A 1.64 RZ-PD-0-CZ ROS-O-CZ C 1.96 R4-01-CZ ROS-01-CZ Both parcels have been rezoned to Recreation Open Space which is consistent with the existing uses on the parcels. Parcel A is currently being used for the Seacliff Country Club Tennis Courts. Parcel C is presently the Tee Box for the Fifth Hole for the Seacliff Golf Course. (Parcel B a third zone change site is not located in the coastal zone). • On June 3, 1992, the Planning Commission approved Zone Change No. 92-1 and recommended approval to the City Council. On July 20, 1992, the City Council approved Zone Change No. 92 -1. During all the public hearings , no coastal concerns were raised. The City Council retained the Coastal Zone S Zfix on both parcels which will require a Coastal Development Permit prior to issuance of building permits for permanent structures. As the certified minutes indicate, there were no coastal concerns expressed by any of the speakers or by written correspondence regarding local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2. Envelopes with postage have been included in this transmittal with the names and addresses of each interested party who spoke at the public hearings. -'July 27, 1992 Page 3 The proposed LCPA No. 92 -2 for Zone Change No . 90-12 and Zone Change No. 92 -1 is submitted pursuant to Section 13511 of the Coastal Commission Administrative Regulations which conforms to the requirements of Chapter 6 of the Coastal Act. The Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2 is consistent with the goals objectives and policies contained within the Coastal Element of the City 's General Plan. These policies address Recreation and Shoreline Access (Section 3 .6.2.1) Visual Resources (Section 3.6.2.3 ) and Community Facilities (Section 3 .6.2.7). Regarding public hear ings , all legal notices made reference to the future Local Coastal Program Amendment and all staff reports were available for public review in the Department of Community Development and the Huntington Beach Public Library. Enclosed are copies of legal notices an the minutes from public hearings . Dura_ng the public hearing process , staff made every effort to maximize public participation in the process. Pursuant to Section 13552(a), enclosed you will find the measures taken to ensure public participation , a list of public hearing dates and public hearing notices indicating where and when published. Please refer to the enclosed public hearing minutes for a summary of comments received at the public hearings. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. If you should have any questions regarding this submittal or any detail of LCPA 92-2, contact Robert Franklin , Associate Planner , of my staff. Sincerely, J`{(`ml,PAP44W_" Mike Adams Director of Community Development Enclosed : Supplemental Information MA:RLF:ip (39.10d) ok,_ Z n Chan N 0-12: 1. Notice of January 28, 1992 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Zone Change No. 90-12. 2. January 28, 1992 Planning Commisison Staff Report. 3. Minutes from January 28, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. 4. Notice of June 15,.1992 City Council Public Hearing. 5. June 15, 1992 City Council Staff Report. 6. Minutes from June 15, 1992 City Council meeting. 7. City Council Ordinance No. 3157. Zone Chan e No. 92-1: Notice of June 3, 1992 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Zone Change No. 92-1. 2.June 3, 1992 Planning Commisison Staff Report. 3.Minutes from June 3,1992 Planning Commission meeting. 4.Notice of July 20, 1992 City Council Public Hearing. 5.July 2i, 1992 City Council Staff Report. 6.Minutes from July 20,1992 City Council meeting. 7.City Council Ordinance Nos. 3166 and 3168. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2: 1. July 20, 1992 LCPA 92-2 City Council Staff Report. 2. Minutes from July 20, 1992 City Council meeting. 3. City Council Resolution No. 6404. (4107d) PLANNING ZONING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA GARFIELD CC-CZ R4-0-CZ4AM2-o-o2 OS-OR nLv°' r Y- - C.T7 COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 LDNE zONE LEGEND,P4JNOED [[5E OPG_NA . AMENDED EAST ORO NO. IxOVS70751 911179 3 0.-21 5C6L. #G01T mL n1 o-16.6•7-62 256 938 2.7-70 76-4 2]e8 u0l 01 Sr «x+X gt415301712.3.62 26 938 1-7 -50 915 flESMf`. 162# 6.07 2:010911 d5[21R 2.21•66 945 545 1196 1-19.87 91.14 25]6 CIIICC•111401 10N.YC6-20-66 66.19 1216 7.6•#3 83.6 2610 010704719D0 61 q:P[ 12-5.66 66-19 1271 )•2-61 e1.i 2606 .Z, P 601111 IOISL 62R{ D15rg95 6-17.68 66-13 1419 1-ii -fi]FED ]OZONE2o06 C7 «34x7[5 317769 P2wd5iq ([t Ptwrv[xt 10'3.6' f' 2-05 [ SMOq[[g6 115 6 2111 66'21-10 49.31 1582 9-!9.86 BS•9 2359 1001300 M::dt 00097104 Ix u[a "1 "7210-!9770 10-10 1606 aw-rrK 007m nE Ongt" 'i sir[MiMii 449 at.O 12(sil 1:9951747W0 11577 55•]-)1 71-1 1 3 r 1707,175.15.12 12-13 0746 -E T-7-72 72-11267 1'761 ,.' 1 71*1-f5-T3 00.35 813 0 CDY6ryx4 OIL 7-2-73 72.39 1055 099600D wnx aL77044CTwxy _ 10.15-73 73-20 1976 7027Fx.21 011229 _. .9.16.71 73-31 1943 %/. 91746 P1 7011 1002-19-76 P10616.50024 AVENUE DM3 M2-01 PL[•- R4-OI Il..n,t H.S"U I 3-6-11 ...,..._., .,..,... _ ...... NOTE. R4-01 " `I.a :.-•91-01 x w•!•i. Dnl.s ars ."El .. ..ol[ «rlq 5RA-0 I -CD M/12-0 i -CD STATEMENT OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, July 20, 1992 A videotape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk's Office. Mayor Silva called the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Ht,'tington Beach to order at 7 p.ni. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Robitaille, Winchell, Silva, Green, MacAllister, Kelly ABSENT: Moulton-Patterson Cit Council ADOPTS LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 92-2 - ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-12 - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-1 - RESOLUTION NO. 6404 - ADOPTED (420.85) The City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator pertaining to Resolution No. 6404 which adopts Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2: Zone Change No. 90-12 and Zone Change 92-1. The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 6404 for Council adoption - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 92-2 SEACLIFF AREA ZONE CHANGES." (Incorpora s Zone Change No. 90-12 and Zone Change No. 92-1 into the City's certic*ed cal Coastal Program) A motion was made by MacAllister, seceded by Kelly, to adopt Resolution No. 6404. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Robitaille, Winchell, Silva, careen, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: None ABSENT: Moulton-Patterson 1. 1.-:.rk !"i _-___QA.s -c ( . Page 2 - Statement of Action - 7/20/92 Mayor Silva adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council and the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to 5:30 p.m., August 3, 1992, Room B-8, Civic Center. ATTEST:Connie Brockwa City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Connie Brockwa City Clerk Connie Brockwa City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Deputy STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Peter Green County of Orange ) Mayor City of Huntington Beach) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected and qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the 20th day of July 1992. WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 19th day of August 1992. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 3157 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R2-PD -01 TO R1-01 ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PALM AVENUE AND CHERRYHILL LANE (DISTRICT MAP 3) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Change No. 90-12 wherein all information has been carefully considered at said hearings and after due consideration of findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council finds that Zone Change No . 90-12 is proper and consistent with the City 's General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: Residential -Planned Development with oil production ) to R1-01 (Low Density Residential with oil production). SECTION 1 . The following real property located on the southeast corner of Palm Avenue and Cherryhill Lane (Exhibit A attached hereto), is hereby changed from R2-PD-01 (Medium Density 1 SECTION 2 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District'Map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-6-11 ) is hereby amended to reflect Zone Change No . 90-12 contained in this ordinance and on District Map 3 attached hereto. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of District Map 3 as amended , shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , California , at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of ,July 1992. Mayor City Clerk IEWED AND .. PROVED : CL- istrator-d - APPROVED AS TO FORM: yy City Attorney y47/ I VITIAT AND PROVED : Director of Community Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING PURPOSES OF TRACT NO. 14243 BEING THAT PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON THE M7.P RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 2-- 7-0I-L7 +o M1-6;7t BEGINNING AT A SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 9 OF TRACT NO. 10069, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF Ct:,TORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 504, PAGES 37 THROUGH 43, INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID CORNER BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED AS "NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 303.36 FEET" FOR A PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 10069; THENCE SOUTH 19°00'00" WEST 49.00 FEET THENCE SOUTH 71°00'00" EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19°00'00" WEST 198.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PALM AVENUE, 100.00 FEET IN WIDTH, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF SAID TRACT NO. 10069, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 850.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 04°33'02" WEST; THENCE WESTERLY 271.85 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PALM AVENUE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°19'27" TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 1, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 83-566, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 184, PAGES 35 AND 36 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PALM AVENUE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 83- 556 THE FOLLOWING COURSE; NORTH 22°52'29" EAST 67.13 FEET, NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 35.00 FEET, NORTH 19°00'00" EAST 165.00 FEET AND NORTH 62°31'46" EAST 55..17 FEET TO THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID TRACT NO. 10069; THENCE SOUTH 71°00'00" EAST 252.00 FEET ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 1.762 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ALDEN & SSOCIATES z- qo-Iv LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING PURPOSES OF TRACT NO. 14243 CIVIL ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS 18012COWAIM SUITE 210-IRVINE . CA 92714 WO. No.0844-162-1X Date 10/09/90 714/660-0110 FAX : 6604419 En '.SJ?1 Chk.PER 3157 Sheet 1 of 2 SCD.L9- P•fo0' 1 li 17 19 0 00'00" w 449.0 0 ' L_ o d N W i. /( 2 AG(ZE5 1 lrtE " NIQ°00 '00"E tfo5.00' E.A'TE.RL1 LINE 'I c ! /of PA 1.. 2 /r7t )C'- / P ,'til. ,^/.8 '-5 h 5./8 4 3 5 -36 1"ALDJEN & g, SSO,'7IATES CIVIL ENOINEERS - PLANNER! - LAND SURVEYORS 11012 COWAN, SUITE 210 • IRVINE. CA 92714 714/6660-0110 FAX:360-011E 4 20.00' 919°DO'00'W I 00 0 TOL N71'00'0o"W " 6'7.13'sy6?.j,,5.001..(. I G KETCH TO ACCO M pA N ' A LEGAL DESCRIPTION HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. at o. NO.084-4- 162-IX En,. 47•M- Chk. F•P•. Q' 0i1i 1o-13-90 SI..l Z• Of 2 LANNSN( SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP CITY OF 1IUNTINGTGN BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA GARFIELD ZONING 11 2-10.71 PPSaT-32076 2.17.66 1 .31 14726.26.70 61.34 1562 10-11.70 70.9 1606 1.3-TI 71.1 166]1-]-72 7197 1706 9.15.72 72-13 1766 7.7.77 72.55 1761 1.-73 7745 111,.. T-22.73 12•>7 1153 W5.73 12-20 ten9.16.76 n•1 1942 5D0PT77 M56CH T-1160 CITY COUNCIL 011D'5."" N0. 256 C 5476373 ORD_jW 5*2607D Or6T_.NC 1.7.62 234 11f 2-3-79 76.6 2363 9.1.62 211,212 631 1-0-f0 147374 6126 2•L•61 363 1166 I-16.62. 61-14 23361.20.66 67170 1216 9.6.63 6Y0 2660 6- 3.61 16.+1 1221 7.2 - 66 6+-7 2701 6-17.61 66.13 1611 ITT •B3 Fl. 20.C 3644.67 52.1 29199.19-ee 6B•9 M2-01 2-162.,. 4111- _ ; n6r 3]9 R4-a-- R4-OI vp °• 61_-1' 8ROS-O '. 3-6-11 DM 3 NOTE- p r r[r r ti 1[ lira: :s.,a7 ..,a r.t ct.t[.1. EGEND' u :Rn<san+ytlglr v]1K156n776KI .Uµ .uw.1.5 prt+er1R VLT4 O6I6St +PCef lew pul Yf • 91-v t p7IeCT ] -^• r1y 0 Tp71.n n.rwK taaal6wnr ogl +6:Ip( fJrrt !E I a..•pr..n' .b• o«.a o-1. ® rwm.u%/, rum 5(2-77.f \7 • AVENUE .L RA-0 I -CD 1. No. 3157 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ss: I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at ,a. regular meeting therof held on the days of June 19.22 , and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 6th day of Jul , 19 92 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Council members: Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Silva, Green, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Council members: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None I, Connie Brockway CITY CLERK e! !h^ City of Huntington Beach and ex-ofh:;:• ^.,fy Council, do hereby certf, ordinance has been pubis;,, In accordance with the City C . Connie Br.: ., . City Clerk and ex-officio lerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California I r^1 -i ! y yc REQI ; TM FO R CITY COUNCIL ACTION- s`, rr• Submitted to: Submitted by: Prepared by: Subject: Hclo)arb-le"Mayo r Date July 20, 1992 and City Council Members Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Michael Adams, Director of Community Develop RESOLUTION NO. ____ WHICH ADOPTS LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 92-2: ZONE CHANGE NO. 90 -12 AND ZONE CHANGE 92-1 Consistent with Council Policy? 14Yes [ j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis , Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: TATEMENT OF IS UE : Transmitted for City Council consideration is Resolution No.&-/which is a request to adopt Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2 which will incorporate Zone Change No. 90-12 and Zone Change No. 92-1 into the City's certified Local Coastal Program. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2 will be transmitted to the California Coastal Commission for final approval. RECOMMENDATI N: Motion to:ti. "Approve Resolution No. b y whi:h adopts Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2 and transmit to the California Coastal Commission for final approval". ANALYSIS: The California Coastal Commission certified the City's Local Coastal Program in 1985. The California Coastal Act requires that any amendments to the City's General Plan and Ordinance Code in the Coastal Zone be approved by the California Coastal Commission. The method of transmitting Zone Change No. 90-12 and Zone Change No. 92-1 is to adopt Resolution No. 655 and then forward the resolution to the Coastal Commission. 1 .Ppg D By CITY COUNCILI CI-I' 19 16. CLFY(K - Zs n han N -12 On June 1, 1992 , the Huntington Beach City Council approved Zone Change No. 90-12 which changed the zoning on a 1.76 acre parcel from R2-PD -01-CZ to R1 -CZ. The Zone Change was requested by Pacific Coast Homes which permits the construction of eight (8) single family homes in the Seacliff Area (See Attachment 2). As with all properties in the Coastal Zone, prior to issuance of building permits, a Coastal Development Permit will be required. All rules and regulations contained in the City's Coastal Land Use Plan and the Coastal Commission regulations will be enforced. Zone Chan e No. 92-1: On June 15 , 1992, the Huntington Beach City Council approved Zone Change No . 92-1 which changed the zoning on three (3) parcels in the Seacliff area (see Attachment 3). Two (2) of the parcels are located within the Coastal Zone boundary, therefore the City's Certified Local Coastal Program must be amended . Both Zone Change requests are consistent with the City's Coastal Land Use Plan, and all coastal regulations will be enforced. The request by Pacific Coas : Homes to change the zoning on Parcel A (1.64 acre) from R2 -PD-0-CZ to ROS -CZ and for Parcel C (1.96 acre) from R4-01 -CZ to ROS-CZ is consistent with the existing Coastal Land Use Plan which depicts a recreation land use designation. Parcel B is not located in the City 's Coastal Zone area. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable.h ALTERNATIVE A TION: The City Council may deny Resolution No.6/O 4 which prevents zone Change No . 90-12 and Zone Change No. 92-1 from becoming effective. ATTACHMENTS : 1.Resolution No. 2.Location map of Zone Change N o.90-12 3.Location map of Zone Change No.92-1 MTU:MA:RLF:lp RESOLUTION NO. 6404 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA , ADOPTING LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 92-2 SEACLIFF AREA ZONE CHANGES WHEREAS, after notice duly given pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and , as required by Public Resour es Code Sections 30503 and 30510, the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach each held public hearings to consider the adoption of zone change No. 90-12 and zone change No. 92 -1, and Both zone changes were determined to be consistent with the c rtified Huntington Beach Coastal Land Use Plan and of the Lalifornia Coastal Act, and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach intends to implement the Local Coastal Program in a manner fully consistent with the California Coastal Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 92-2 which includes zone change No. 90-12 and zone change No. 92-1, are hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Progiam Amendment No. 92-2 will take effect automatically upon Coastal Commission approval subject to Public Resources Code sections 30512, and 30519. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of Jul , 1992. Mayor ' ATTEC 4'd City Clerk REVIEWED ' ND 7 OVED: i Adnini'sctrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney INITIATE ND AROVED: Director of Community Development ZC 90-12HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISIONHUNTINGTON REACH ZC 92-1HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISIONHUNTINGTON BEACH Res. No. 6404 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July , 19 92 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Robitaille Winchell Silva Green MacA llister Kell NOES: Council members: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Moulton-Patterson 1 y er an ex-o ticsv er of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ZC 92-1HUNTINGTON 6EACH PLANNING DIVISION