Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Amendment GPA1990004 - Correspondence Reviewed (City and Other Agencies)I HUNTINGTON REACH CITY O P HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Louis Sandoval, Director Public Works From Mike Adams, Director Community Development Subject Date GENERAL-PLAN AMENDMENT NO.90-4 September 27, 1.990 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4).consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial. to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 uigac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac ) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically , we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction . Please include in your reply the following information: The nature and magnitude of any problems associated with the proposed and alternative land uses on streets , sewers, water system or storm drains. - Location and size of existing water, sewer and storm drain systems currently serving the project area. If necessary , the location and type of improvements needed to provide service to the above mentioned proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation . If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at (714) 536 -5271. MA:TR:lp Attachment (7317d) (1003D ) variables CP.,TY OF IHUNTINCTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH -1,4,E -,-? i To Raymond Picard Fire Chief From Mike Adams, Director Community Development Subj :ct Date GENERAL*PLAN AMENDMENT NO.90 -4 September 2:, 1990 NEGATIVE DECLARATION CO. 90-22 The City's Department of Community Develo•-went is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4)•consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to'attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis c-1vbs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically , we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: - The nature and magnitude of any problems associated with the proposed and alternative land uses. - The average response time to the area. - Additional manpower or equipment needed to serve the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation . If,you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. MA:TR:Ip Attachment (7317d) (1003D ) variables General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u1gac) alternative would allow for develop ment of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac ) alternative would allnw for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: - The nature and magnitude of any problems associated with the proposed alternative land uses. - The average response time to the area. - Additional manpower or equipment needed to serve the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comm.nts by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please peel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. MA:TR:Ip Attachment (7317d) (1003D) variables CITY OF HUN T INGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Jim Engle, Acting Director Community Services From Subject Date GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Mike Adams, Director Community Development October 1, 1990 The City's Department of.Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Vi-sitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington, Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As r: part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with'the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum o f 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: Any comments you may have regarding providing library or recreation services to the proposed and alternative land uses. Any comments you may have regarding the proposed public beach and the loss of the tennis club and banquet facilities. Due to a limited tine schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation . If you have any questions , please feel free to contact Tom Rogers of my staff at (714) 536-5271. MA:TR:lp Attachment (7341d) Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1990 Mr. David Nunenkamp Office of Planning and Researach 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22, Dear Mr. Nunenkamp: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are. evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The-project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses„ This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac ) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction . Please include in your reply the following information: Any State concerns regarding the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation . If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner TR:lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D ) variables s City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Plann7ng Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Mr. Jerry Dominguez Southern California Edison Company 7333 Bolsa Ave. Westminster, CA 92683 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Dominguez: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open. Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Day Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several. tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. 0 General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac ) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically , we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or ju:cisdiction . Please include in your reply the following information!: The nature and magnitude of any problems associated with servicing the proposed and alternative land uses. The location and size of all existing lines in the project area. • If needed, the location and size of any improvements needed to serve the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation . If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner TR:lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPART MENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Mr. Gera ld Smith Southern California Gas Company P. O. Box 3334 Anaheim , CA 92803 Subject: GENERAL 1`1AAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr . Smith: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space ai;d Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 unit; per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached locat.on map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 A;;.`,ernative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development or a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3• A Medium High Density (25 u;'gac ) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically , we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction . Please include in your reply the following -.iformation: • The nature and magnitude of problems associated with servicing the proposed and alternative land uses. • The location and size of existing gas lines. • If necessary , the location and size of any improvements needed to service the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for t-' preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comm-hts by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions , please fee! free to contact me at (714) 536 -5271. Sincerely, Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner TR:lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D ) variables City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Mr. Jim Kennedy Southern California Edison Company 390 E . 17th Street, Unit E Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90--22 Dear Mr. Kennedy: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment. to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure andcompatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. Page 2 Alternative 2: Alternative 3: 90-4 A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. in preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: The nature and magnitude of ary problems associated with servicing the proposed and alternative land uses. The location and size of all existing lines in the project area. If needed, the location and size of any improvements needed to serve the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, G C Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner TR:lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Mr. Stanley Tkacyzk Rainbow Disposal Company P. O. Box 1026 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. ^0-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 9'u-22 Dear Mr . Tkacyzk: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. i! General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require some assistance from your office . Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction . Please include in your reply the following information: The nature and magnitude of any problems associated with servicing the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner TR:lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables C City of Huntington Beach 2000 IMAI N STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Ms. Christine Spencer Orange County Transit District P. O. Box 3005 Garden Grove, CA 92642-3005 Subject : GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Ms. Spencer: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses . This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. 4. General Plan No. Page 2 Alternative 2: Alternative 3: 90-4 A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: The location of the routes which currently serve the project area. The nature and magnitude of problems associated with servicing the proposed land use and the alternative land uses. • Any modifications to routes and/or additional buses that may be needed to be added to existing routes to service the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, omas Rogers Assistant Planner TR:lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables t City of Huntington Beach 1 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -,. Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Mr. Thomas Dawes Orange County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Dawes: The ^ity's Department of Community Development is currently in the proc,.s of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor--Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. i General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac ) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require sane assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction . Please include in your reply the following information: The nature and magnitude of any problems associated with servicing the proposed ana alternative land uses. The location and size of existing sewer lines. If necessary , the location and type of additional equipment needed to serve the proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance , for your cooperation . If you have ,any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sin;: rely, Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner TR: lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D ) variables Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1990 Thomas Mathews, Director of Planning County of Orange EMA P. O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Mathews: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation /Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue , immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment i n itself does not constitute any new development ; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units ). The developer has proposed 19 single -family dwellings on the site . A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as fellows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches,, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. P General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: Any comments you have on the impacts of the proposed and alternative land uses on the Bolsa Chica. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner TR:lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables r "dft City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Michael Haynes SCAIMD 9150 Flair Drive El Monte, CA 91731 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Haynes: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses . This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: Any comments you have on the impacts the proposed and alternative land uses will have on air quality in the region. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, (J Thomas Rogers. Assistant Planner TR: lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables b. J c°, City of Huntingto n Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA D2648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Robert Joseph Caltrans District 12 2501 Pullman Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Joseph: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses . This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. i General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: Any comments you may have on the impacts of the proposed and alternative land uses on Pacific Coast Highway. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, bmas Rogers Assistant Planner TR: lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STCL'•ET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536.5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Richard Spicer SCAG 818 West 7th, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Spicer: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General, Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; hewev:.-, it would provide for future residential development (u,; to 9 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses . This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. r General Plan No. Page 2 Alternative 2: Alternative 3: 90-4 A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: Any comments you have as to the impacts the proposed and alternative land uses may have on the region. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, T omas Rogers Assistant Planner TR: lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536.5241 Planning Division 536-5271 July 25, 1990 Tom Dawes Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-5 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Dawes: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to Rl (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps ). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the following information in your reply: The capacity of existing sewer facilities in the project vicinity and their ability to serve the proposed land use. 4. The location of the existing sewer lines which currencly serve the project area. The nature and magnitude of problems associated with servicing the proposed land use. Mr. Dawes Page 2 The location and type of improvements required to serve the proposed land use. Mitigation measures which OCSD recommends be placed on the proposed project or subsequent development. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later thazi Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, 1 0 Julie Osugi Planning Aide JO: lp Attachment: Location Maps (6612d) 4 HUNTINGTON BEACH To CITY O F HUNTINGT O N. BEACH INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Bruce Gilmer Public Works Subject GPA NO.90-4, ZC NO.90-5, EA NO.90-22 From Date Juli6Lbsugi Planning Aide July 25, 1990 The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),corrsists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to R1 (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will requir6 some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the following information in your reply: Are the arterials in the project vicinity operating at a LOS of C or better?. Are any modifications to arterials and/or intersections that needed to serve the proposed land use? If so what are they? What is the nature and magnitude of traffic/circulation problems associated with the proposed land use at the given location? Note: Project will access from Sceptre Lane i N Bruce Gilmer Page 2 Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. JO: lp Attachment: Location Maps (6619d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Tom Huntley Fire Department Subject GPA NO.90-4, ZC NO.90-5, EA NO.90-22 From Jul Osugi Planning Aide Date July 25, 1990 The' City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to R1 (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your department. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the following information in your reply: 1.The nature and magnitude of problems associated with providing Fire service to the proposed land use. 2.Will the proposed General Plan Amendment and require any additional manpower or facilities project site. Zone to Change serve the Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. JO:lp Attachment: Location Maps (6618d) t`. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICA:TION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Bob Eichblatt Public works Subject GPA NO.90-4, ZC NO.90-5, EA NO.90-22 From Juli sugi Pla ing Aide Date July 25, 1990 The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process o f analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site , from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to R1 (Low Density Residential ). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north F ide of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attache ; location maps ). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your department. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the following information in your reply: 1. The nature and magnitude of problems associated with servicing the proposed land use. a. Sewers b. Storm Drains c. Water Systems d. Transportation Systems 2. The location and type of any improvements needed to provide the above services to the proposed land use. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial ,study I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. JO:lp Attachment: Location Maps (6617d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Jim Moore From Julie sugi Police Department Plan Ing Aide Subject GPA NO.90-4, ZC NO.90-5, EA NO.90-22 Date July 25, 1990 The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to R1 (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner. Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums' and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your department. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the following information in your reply: 1.The nature and magnitude of problems associated with providing Fire service to the proposed land use. 2.Will the proposed General Plan Amendment and require any additional manpower or facilities project site. Zone to Change serve the Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. JO:lp Attachment: Location Maps (6630d) !L City of Huntington Beach Euilding Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 July 25, 1990 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Bill Glines Southern California P. O. Box 3334 Gas Company Anaheim,CA 92803-3334 SUBJECT:GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.90-4, ZONE CHANGE NO.90-5 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-22 Dear Mr.Glines: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to R1 (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banque: Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the foglowing information in your reply: The location and size of existing gas lines The nature and magnitude of problems associated with the proposed land use. Bill Glines Page 2 If necessary, the location and size of additional equipment needed to serve the project area. Any mitigation measures which the Southern California Gas Company recommends be imposed upon the project or subsequent development. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Iv UJulie Osugi Planning Aide JO: 11p Attachment, Location Maps (6613d) 4 t City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536.5241 Planning Division 536-5271 July 25, 1990 Tim Skeber Rainbow Disposal Company 17121 Nichols Huntington Beach, CA 92647 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4, ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-5 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Skeber: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to Rl (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the following information in your reply: The nature and magnitude of problems associated with servicing the proposed land use in the project area. w r Mr. Skeber Page 2 Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Julie Osugi Planning Aide JO: I p Attachment: Location Maps (6614d) f City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALI FORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 July 25, 1999 Chuck McKimmey Southern California Edison Company 7333 Bolsa Avenue Westminster, CA 92683 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4, ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-5 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. McKimmey: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90•-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to Rl (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps ). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone change may have on your service or jurisdiction„ Please include the following information in your reply: The location and size of existing lines in the project area. 4 The nature and magnitude of problems associated with the proposed land use. If necessary, the location and size of additional equipment needed to serve the project area. r9 Chuck McKimmey Page 2 t' • Any mitigation measures which Southern California Edison Company recommends be imposed upon the proposed project subsequent development. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation.' If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Planning Aide ulie Osugi JO: lp Attachment: Location Maps (6615d) 4 City of Huntingt o n Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 55o-5241 Planning Division 536.5271 July 25, 1999 Kay Van Siskel Orange County Transportation District Anaheim,, CA 92642-3033 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4, ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-5 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-22 Dear Ms. Van Siskel: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in t,q process of analyzing an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed amendment (90-4), and concurrent zone change request (90-5),consists of an amendment from Mixed Use Development and Recreational Open Space land use designations to a Medium Density Residential land use designation and a zone change, on the north most portion of the site, from the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to R1 (Low Density Residential). The project site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue on the north side of Warner Avenue at Sceptre Lane (please refer to the attached location maps). The 3.54 acre site is currently occupied by the 9,000 square foot Huntington Harbour Bay Club Banquet Facility which is anticipated to be demolished and rebuilt as 19 condominiums and one single family home. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests in themselves do not constitute new development. However, if approved, the request will allow for development of 19 condominium units and one single family home on the site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts that the proposed amendment and zone c Mtge may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include the fu4lowing information in your reply: A. The location of routes which currently serve the project area. The nature and magnitude of problems associated with serving the proposed land use. Any modifications to routes and/or additional buses that may be needed to serve tie proposed use. it Ms. Van Sish l Page 2 ( Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the initial study, I would appreciate it if you could send your comments to me no later than Friday, August 10, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel fr_., to call me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, JiYlie Osugi Planning Aide JO: lp Attachment: Location Maps (6616d) 4 STATEMENT OF RE UIREMENTS Gross area: Net lot area: Number and type of units: 3.541 2.613 (9)30" x 60" marina units (4)30" x 80" marina units (3)30' x 80'off water units (2)30' x 65'off water units (1)30" x 42' marina unit 19 total units Units and bedrooms per gross acre: 88 per gross acre Floor area of each unit: (9)3,100 sf (2)3,567 sf (3)3,750 sf (4)5,000 sf Percentage of site coverage of all buildings: (9) 71 (2) 56 (3) 69 (4) 69 Number and type of covered parking spaces: I Parking Required Parking Provided Covered:38 Covered:57 Guest:9.5 Guest:30 Total required : 47.5 Total provided: 87.0 Useable common open space : .510 acres Useable recreational open space: .4 2 2 acres ,4W/NA!0) rv ic.WA--K'I1.14 A9 E I r (___- I pfftlaF- I- - -4IEMF NCYf ft5)**ANE10- AVE,Hsi!?/'Yc 7 7'/ f U/e Pr4}'' GL l/.' MANN/IA!Qt WIM rM.-IC.WAI-11WAN/CCE55W tNEP-, AVENV.AJQe,Pr1 rH =-yi1yr1Wr4W HAoC A AMYc rig/ 'raca UNITS - G'ON DO.Wry oi:v;: vsiavr /a.cd• cwwccr .wo,acrFSS w/,.rJ ,rec ..vnmriysrzr ,.wa .e-cc .Fi(/-q -d A drC. / JirC A e rFPrxa 9l. eruieniC"lvcC6°f ,acts -- -,- '2'N . J sCr +.YS Oi' .vim'sUr/-JU.B.t.Cfa.'/CScW Win..-iriJiz'ic-ra• rt101WIDE PUPWc WR44,,W4%YtVal IQ14ER fVWUeA( ApHA*rPAWbENCACC,SS r%1s He PROJECT c Cl-.ja RECORDED BY -Re _ INDIVIDUAL AND/OR GROUP DESCRIPTION: PERSONS IN ATTENDANCE: AGENDA: DISCOUR yr-t - rre> C cXViI t 4 u ()J Gi l?cwxC 6z- rv, rs' tx f S 3 mac' O,Z 14 4-0 5 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR ACTIO AKEN: OSJ r-Q2 h0. w - C- AGREEMENT z DATE: 1-M 2t-k cop I enQ-r, DISAGREEMENTS A SFi--) I huntington ;beach planning department L,`ca.cX QcU ^,i t ar (tt u Y.Pe {5 ' p cJe ¢ oV. .LOA- Z V e Germs s CS 7 a hL s `°s crIsI sO 54 1/_ s- /GvL`-!°-C,wrt71 p. ' ,c.lu.ti.,V•F-, __ ,1.`fGt,.S. l; G ,C,Ct..v .e:.'t- BAYCLUB PHASE II MEETING AGENDA Date: September 27, 1990 Time: 2:00 P.M., 3rd Flonr Conference Room 1. Project Schedule 2. Additional Information Required 3. Coastal Element Update 4. Environmental Assessment Update 5. Draft Specific Plan a) format b) areas of concern 6. Other Business 7. Adjourn (7286d) U DATE September 5 September 12 - October 2 September 19 Week of September 24 October 2 Week of October 8 October 16 November 6 November 15 November 16 December 4 December 17 December 21 December 2.5 January 7, 1991 January 11, 1991 (7290d) WORK PROGRAM GENEk„L. PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 9C-4 /ZONE L,,NGE NO. 90-5 NEGATIVE DECLARAT'.tON NO. 90-22 ACTION Environmental Assessment Committee - mitigated negative declaration recommended. Comment period for proposed Negative Declaration No. 90-22 (21 days). Staff Meeting - discuss land use alternatives. Meet with Applicant to discuss project, transmit areas of concern, and recommend modifications of the Coastal Element and the Specific Plan. Close of Comment Period for Negative Declaration. Meet with applicant to discuss project status, revised Specific Plan and Coastal Element. Planning Commission Study Session. 1. Staff report to Senior Planner. 2. Prepare Legal Notice. Staff report distributed to Planning Commission (2 weeks in advance). Legal Notice due for publication (labels required). Planning Commission Public Hearing. Legals and labels to City Clerk for City Council Meeting. RCA to Senior Planner. RCA to City Administrator. City Council Public Hearing. Local Coastal Program Amendment forwarded to California Coastal Commission for adoption. me PROJECT 1'`--- RECORDED BY INDIVIDUAL AND/OR GROUP DESCRIPTION: PERSONS IN ATTENDANCE: ' dv\ -4 AGENDA: D DISCOURSE:i- o- - 7- o Vc_ AGREEMENTS AGREEMENTS RECOMMENDED ACTION OR ACTION TAKEN: t huntington beach planning department -ski(-TO S? VS zc T,77.1c1-,( R tea,r , AGENDA MEETING WITH THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REGARDING HUNTINGTON HARBOR BAY CLUB - PHASE I & II MONDAY AUGUST 20, 1990 - 3:30 P.M. Parties Attendin :Howard Zelefsky Sarah Lazarus Scott Hess Tom Rogers Dick Harlow Jar Coultrup Kathy Freeman I. Items For Discussion on Phase I: A. Parceling off pool and recreation room 1. Parcel map acceptance by City. 2. Other options II.Items For Discussion on Phase II:A. Team players designated B. Status of processing 1. Items still required for environmental assessment 2. Estimated completion of environmental assessment C.Time line for remainder of processing (City Council & tract map approval) D.Specific plan 1. Legal descriptions of subareas 2. other items required? i pc.:Nar•e.:iJ 24-5d2 1 °^-5-IIPIZ r.CT SITEI -T -OM 28\ OM 21 DM:J3 j ---- --N --- ,- 9-5-II 10-5-II ``.O M 9 DM 11 16-5-11. 15-5-II 14-5 11 •, DiiT - Chi 17 DV:15 I2A-II 22--11 2 -5-II 0M24 0 25 W ,'••-` 2e,3U-5-11 I 295-II /DM 35 DM 34 Dtf 33 - -32-5 11 33-5-II N-, 3C''-II• DM 06 DM 37 ."W 38 -. - 0h1,32 p \-- -I---,..,- - r- 5-6-II 3-6-11 DM4 0 DM3 9-6-II DM 10 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA srr cw[n•wo- cr b.r. 0- 6-11 DM a s 24-I DM 27 A . e V6. 27-5-II ZONING INDEX MAP LEGEND 19-6'-10-SECTION -TOWNSHIP- RANGE DM 22-DISTRICT MAP 22 26-s-II 25- -II OM 31 DM 30 35-5-II 36- 5-1I fbM 39 DM 40 2-6-II 1- I-II 106-6-5 -10/ D 2 DA I IDM 6 DM 1 /•II--11 7-6 -10 8-G-10 D 12. !!. DM 13 DM7 t9M8 14-6- I IO 13-6-I fti 18-6-10,;7-6-10 O<` DM I ONCE i4 DM120 .DM19 4-/ 24-6-I 19- -10 DM 29 0 -,22 WESTPORTINDHILLCC-RmIno mwv a.IALADDIN Dh.WARNERIwEOGEWAIE4JREZONEFROMHHBCSPPIERHEAD LINETO Rl-CZWEATHERLY BAYPROJECTAREAPROJECT(PHASE I I )ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTNO, 90-22HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISIONacpUft'1AVE.UHUNTINGTON BEACH aTATa OP CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION tc..;k11M*m coev, Cbnllwlb LIC L MLCU119Y, LAe.n.lw Cownwr ueu U. MOP, &ttDW of FA-.w ro7w Trv[ o,rlc. 1107. 12th stop"' ,• eao w..nte. W1...4'. Soil ewne T.PLDn1Cb( Q..wUvs,GY1Nw ..: LS 11TS e .+, a 1 January 31, 1985 Mr. Richard A, Harlow 333 West Yorktown Avenue Huntington Beach , California 92648 /y File"Ref. SO 85-01-16' Dear Mr. Harlon Thin is if response to'your request for a det+rminatioti of'State interestin ti` Land proposed for residential development , by the Huntington clay and Racquet Club ,'located in the -City of Huntington Beach, Orange County. Based on information available to us at this time,. the peoject`does not. appear to involve State land.,!Therefore , a permit fr om the State Lands Cohenis;4cm Willnot be regr .ired. This artinn does not constitute, nor shall it be construed as, a waiver of any right, title or interest , in any lands owned by or under the jurisdiction; of the State df California. or any of its agencies, or any grantee in trust bt,,, sovereign lands, including,-but not limited to,,political corporationt or sub divisions bf .the State. If you have any questions, please call Debbie Townsend at (9i6) 322-,1219.. Stntereiy, HUNTINGTON BEACH I)EVELJPMENT SERVICES LESLIE ii.. GRIMES, Deputy`Chief Division of Land Management and Conservation ` '<Le OLOIIOL OL'J 1tMEJV :. FEB13 1984 P,Ci, Bo* I5113 Huiltirigtun P,uach, CA 92648 & Environmental Board HUI A GTON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Department of Community Development Oct Environmental Resources Section City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1., 1990 ECJIV ;. 1990 IC,^,^,I.U'.till OLV 'T1rIt..sN,t;,c I. Subject: Draft Negative Declaration No. 90-22 In conjunction with General Plan Amendment No. 90-4, Zone Change No. 90-5, and Code Amendment No. 90-5. Attn: Julie Osugi Project Request: To amend the City's Local Coastal Program by modifying the Land Use Plan and lmplememting ordinances redesignating the use on the subject site from visitor -serving commercial to medium -density residential . The request also Includes modifying the boundaries of the Huntington Harbour Bay Club Specific Plan to reflect the existing plerhead line and a proposed transfer of property 'aetween the applicant and an adjacent property owner. Location: The site is located at 4121 Warner Avenue (Northwest Corner of Warner Avenue and Sceptre Lane). II. Findings : T`,e Environmental Board has completed it review of the Huntington Beach Assessment Checklist and the Standard mitigating measures for the referenced subject. Comments: 1. Reference 2 A soils re ort should be done stating proper co tr c n re uir ment for foundati n a d footin s for 3 stor construction versus the more rominate 2 stor construction of the existin area since the ro' ct lies I a It zone s 'e t to li uifaction 2. Reference 14d: Formal assurances of ingress and egress should be in place for the public 's use of the bay club beach which is now under public d- u n. 3. Reference 16d: Sewage should also be considered due to the ca ties of the existing pumping station limits. [I Recommendation : APPROVAL SUBJECT TO FINDINGS - The Environmental Board recommends approval only on the adequacy of Draft Negative 90-43 subject to staff recom,epded miti ons and the above listed concerns. Ro,( H. Richardson Ad hoc Committee Chairman Jeffrey Edens, Chair Charles Montero cc: Mayor Thomas Mays James Cathcart Councilman Peter Green Planning Commissioner Victor Leipzig 1'4 a- COURTNEY D E EW TER LANE HOMEOWNERS G OUP _ 17220 (,' irtney Lane Huntington Bea.,h, CA 92649 (714) 840-3802 (714) 840-1092 „FAX (714) 968-2472 September 10, 1990 1990 Mr. Mike Adams Director Community Development N ,ta,ra , City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 It was our understanding that based upon our meeting in May that we would be advised of all public meetings as they related to the Coultrup Development at the Huntington Harbour Bay and Racquet site. It came to our attention that there was an Environment Assessment Committee Meeting September 5, at 2 P.M. discussing the change in zoning of the Bay Club to medium density housing (19) single family homes. We understand that public comment is not allowed at these meetings but the public can attend. We would have liked to have had the opportunity to attend that meeting. I spoke with Michael Uberuaga today, and we informed me that this letter should ensure us being notified of all such meetings on this project in the future. We appreciate your cooperation. Sincerely, Michael Cavallo cc: M. Uberuaga Membership r E 4Tf IL R ?Z&V 4062 ALADDIN DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 Ti D Mr. Mike Adams Director of Planning City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 DEC 1 <) 1981 DEPARTMENT OF COt.Mt1NITV DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION The Coultrup Development Company's in-progress and proposed developments at 4124 Warner Avenue are located immediately east of and adjacent to our 98 Weatherly Bay townhouses, which were built in 1965. The first phase of the Coultriup project consists of thirty-six 3 3/4-story condom iri iums;on the east portlor of the property : along' the north side of Warner Ave. Adjacent to and northeast of the condos is an existing parking lot, which is going to remain intact to provide parking for non-resident boat owners using the marina. The marina is.owned by Mr, Ferydoun Ahadpour. -The phase now under consideration includes 13 single-family homes at the West end of the Coultrup development, on the north side of Warner Avenue east of Sceptre Lane, This site is presently occupied by the Bay and Racquet Club. One additional home is planned, l believe, on'the Waterfront, h.t.:in theinorthwest corner of the property, but will be owned by Mr. Ahadpour. Frankly, plans for the actual housing units look great. Our concern is with the traffic situation being established by a combination of the three projects described above: condos, marina parking, and 19 single-family homes. As we understand the developer's plans, he proposes to remove the existing driveway to the parking lot from Edgewater Lane, therefore, all condo and marina vehicles would enter anr' exit via a driveway on Warner Ave. east of Sceptre Lane. Next, he plans to cut a new driveway from the 19 proposed single-family homes onto Sceptre, a small residential street which serves as our only exit/entry point. This cor;ibination of actions would cause a great deal of congestion and danger to our residents as well as those of the 3 Coultrup/Ahadpour projects. The entrance/exit for Weatherly Bay is confined to one point--Sceptre and Warner. Traffic on Warner already makes exiting very difficult on heavy traffic days. It seems certain that Warner Ave. at the location of the proposed Coultrup driveway will be a divided street, which is proper. The had news is that all of the vehicles exiting this driveway will have to turn right and travel west on Warner. Logically, at least half of these vehicles will really be trying to l,.PAGE 1 OF 2 proceed east on Warner. Therefore, 5031' of the Westbound, vehicles, upon reaching the first intersection, which is sceptre, will either attempt a U-turn or, more likely, enter our tract at Sceptre, circle around, and join the rest of us in what will then be one big traffic jam attempting to exit Sceptre to eastbound Warner. We, the Board of Governors of Weatherly Bay Homewowners Association request that: 1. Driveway to parking lot from Edgewater Lane be kept in operation . This will reduce the traffic on Warner, and allow those people in the parking lot and condos who desire to head somewhere other than west on Warner to exit onto Edgewater Lane and eventually head east and north via the numerous residential streets available, as has been done for the past 25 years. 2. A traffic signal be installed on Warner Ave. at Sceptre Lane. This provides a legal and reasonably safe location for the U -turners and relieves the conflict between these vehicles and those which enter and exit our tract If this cannot be funded by the City, we feel that costs should be born by Coultrup, as the additional traffic necessitating the signal will be generated by residents of the Coultrup development. 3. No driveway be permuted on Sceptre Lane for the 18 Coultrup homes. This proposed driveway Would result in increased traffic through the only existing Weatherly Bay exit, which is already sometimes overloaded. Respectfully submitted for your consideration, Board of Governors, WBHOA cc Jon Coultrup Ferydoun Ahadpour H.B. City Council c - G•ter Donald N. Miller , President Terry Sweem, Vice-President Willis George, Treasurer David Hepburn, Secretary F. Van Harrison, Member-at-Large Robert Richardson, Manager PAGE 2 OF 2 P 6SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ! gas ICOMPANY ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION • P O. BOX 3334, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92803 October 2, 1990 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Thomas Rogers Subject; General Plan Amendment #90-4 Negative Declaration #90-22 of 06 Ptpq ,lj comowsvv GptWStON . This is in response to y)ur letter dated 9-26-90 requesting maps and data on our facilities. For your use, atlas prints showing the general location of our facilities are attached. For more precise location information before you begin construction, contact USA (Underground Service Alert) at 1-800-422-4133. It is the responsibility of the utility, developer or engineering firm to determine if a conflict exists between the proposed development and our facilities. If a conflict is identified and can only be resolved by alteration of our facilities, or additional information is required, please contact our local District Distribution Supervisor at (714)634-3134. Please note that any alteration of our facilities is 100% collectible from the respective agency. Sincerely, 1 ` 7f Bill Glines Technical Supervisor LC/du attachments Cc: Jack Allen Ile N / City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 September 26, 1990 Mr. Gerald Smith Southern California Gas Company P. O. Box 3334 Anaheim, CA 92803 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Smith: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres )(please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow f or development of a maximum of 17 single -family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac ) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis , we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically , we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction . Please include in your reply the following information: • The nature and magnitude of problems associated with servicing the proposed and alternative land uses. • The location and size of existing gas lines. • If necessary , the location and size of any improvements needed to service the proposed and alternat-.ve land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation . If you have any questions , please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, omas Rogers Assistant Planner TR: lp Attachment (7239d) (1002D ) variables rSTATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS AND TRANSF ATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 2501 PULLMAN STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92705 Mr. Thomas Rogers City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92683 GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor October ii,.1990 File: IGR\CEQA Negative Dec for General Plan Amendment # 90-4 Neg ,Dec # 90-22 SCH #none Subject: Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 90-4 Mr. Rogers: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment number 90-4. Caltrans District 12 has no comment at this time. Please continue to keep us informed of any future developments which could potentially impact our State Transportation Facilities. If you have any questions or if we can be of any further assistance feel free to call Chuck Limon at 714 724 2249. Thank you, r tw 12obert J eph,'Chief Advance Planning Branch CE IV OCT 1 71990. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION cc: Ron Helgeson, HQTRS Planning Terri Lovelady, OPR ,+: r,S.7nrz JFAPIN= 1 CIR.sa: -e.a ...r r•rnnl h LOS pA7 S u ITIT' 5.557395 d } `al .Iq 1-h-41 5157J 3b5a7-04q 2' :I N ° T ^1 --, o..%T`B 11°`o•1 t:-DORADO a"G::SB u -r ) .„ t•n .ix BY. /n 1y4 `{lam L. 1 .r•f - x•K f1M1 W I \w^% 'N n \ 9 '7542 24B(4T PT ,V I N3 4:.SB PTV) 2PEM IY83 I yERyiGE3 Fb¢%1 ' 120' 2 FEM 12.63 •./ \ BLD65 G•II Iis 1 171x 1 84,0.431BB 101•'rt I5 ti I xl 30542 .258( 2S3N 5-3054 Ou1 Y .I,I 7'EMLIx•P,T)L84Q B - 12't1N 9 N S Q j 5'^3 Vt PE \ D 5w •.TII2P[u4 .84 JIZ.TORTUG filt3CS6L0i1 1i-fEYT 5NPT; ZR• ' - '•' - r' 4.6., 'hFE N x2.1:P b lS`.' S/PE -rpE l E' OF $0\,THERH :OLH 'ri;S GAS -:MPANf OF CALIP7RNIA _ o J TII :•O Icy 7 •s•°.q. " d N I Y.\\ Q - J ^i • R 2)/ '• C Y "`I S^ C V ri J r.f ,.,..3J?`:'py 2"T_3.;.•_c •t'r ti •,,,^ ''t • 2' ,,gel Z Z. k 3 '.°5 1.w •aa °i; Y - " GLf/t:c70Y I t yz - 7 kre / =6 •' I I •Wi tr .y , \ \ :-I °/.7Z'YOY yTP •J, j Oh `.\ /•N -• I ^ =I j ri u ,a?' • .': •..", ! ; ,,,.,^.^. I , Iir/f/' C.Q/ G V V IFS1J rte} t q•¢3' ; #r ,r -T r-C3C5i 2 ". a• B6 r-i h ` z3oesa-/L_ rd I l,i .PT .b II flirt I I;%,.`I'\ _I ¶ I J '•. 14N GAB / .:, h i • n ( I f t C, 92 - 19,28 88-4 Fp ti r,1 ^••1 PFD 'r B• J a a, • 7, r s 't• N >' N p •70 of LOS PATOS $ a•S. 17 B1P;TB7i 17181 8PP 1'691 J s re •H , 17/6Z •7,F•t'•38568 5,y d N -77 z N S•156l39 15 a 0.9021 5.2oloiS "nT1 41/.Y,-FE dB•II-S73a6 Y• '1 /n3Z7e•a•w467vs• /7%42 It Y245 7y s eso4f 17191 /pr.a - - -O 5 4One76-a -38470 /EP-U-41L201 gip[ -e2 z'7 •r ru ^ _iiaY56 /'Y A fz^IL• /7202', I1t01 ``t r-- s.. u.u v "' 76-5-C20C94 "• I 7BN•BJ2'E• ` 1Yhr 5'115.1 7 .11b201. %' IE h 'PE./ hr • nis nLi '17235 .1 r nz11 WK z 77•I,y PL'/692L ea a•Sasei 7F-N-4237179•P-46839 N pf, 3 265' I • -M n n 30542.013 2'PEM Z-10 *5521-04 r PSM iµ1:,. 3T 718.ai50 n. -5909b 1PE•n!1 1719/ . :SS 73•N•11Z94 55 07 ,5.141 1E•PE 7.6'07 erl, OC 88-3 LLRECHT a 8 4 I- 1 L 7141 6.61 U Par[. Yu• 17191ae 117.07 _.• / O 4 4 n%L l T t 67-T•364T1 7Th Q '1 vzvE r, s 'y 9;s°r t `y 4af£ ' I 0I /6ZOZ I4ERMfV1 `sN O o 6 n/62/2 y 1 r 87•7-94971 /6722 - 75T)2C2 (0Cic9]2 '3. S yy'i' I 1.36 if 1 d1' 4171 15'6E ' 17212 q a J 21D N77-'•09693 4. Apia39 16 6- e xz hy1 m i e7ase?•} q ...-X 1F q L IoI hV1w 191' W 115'• 7 Ojl _ u tr h ^ 1.` _ .I+ 61 I Gi. 60 95.47 Z 3 PEM a &30547821.E PEM•1 `_9555 '3°565-a0L 21•77' 4D3 1} S VACATED 221' 92 Rr-14 Srr y.3-"1 77-A"PE• C.URTIS N y N Y"re. 2 25 nzlz 76'176 yy. kv,17 77i7.53LZ6`. 16/CI /[g• IL •77•/1-53625 di,r7 h u w AEA/9' E I C3. .5 17231 83- •428183 1 P_ 'x- 90 'A-O2C'30549•8-19r,t 92 52 [ All rn/s zcE 9, 26' M%• oaf "f9 $2 'Q6 )Z'J8 `..1c 88-3 Cd'. ruuz _ . r•YF.ITHE.PLY.IM%1-11.91 -4.t•4>4an4-041h OilBeC(`I" 6•Aa' SCEPT.PE%IL 1&4 4s'N6J7lroLN.lii4,-a"UF,'rri> a6aTy is16brI4")s -0C7 N rA s uS ,W n tc {t 3•lao x 9-,:sk . ,3y' rM°0 r S iF a• uM S,• P C•2LOOSO •QJ / :••°uT `• A. ae1rM.a :•00 lta7 f4 fM -••••G __ J a c,rr Fib . F 5•N///)-d Nh '4 h• zw?rs 92 - 19,2$ 98-150 S.1 een•u 2 RECEIVED C T1 9 199O RAM C`a E DEPARTMENT OF .COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY OCT171 9 Thomas Rogers, Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , CA 92648 FILE MICHAEL M. RUANE DIRECTOR, EMA 12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CA 92702-4048 TELEPHONE; (714) 834-2306 FAX II 834-2395 NCL 90-143 SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 90-4, Negative Declaration No. 90-22 Dear Mr. Rogers: The above referenced project is an analysis of an amendment to the Coastal Element of the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach. The General Plan would provide for future residential development (Medium Density Residential) in an area now designated for Open Space/Recreation and Visitor- Serving Commercial uses. The project area is approximately 2.6 acres on the north side of Warner Avenue immediately east of Sceptre Lane. The County of Orange has reviewed the proposed Amendment resulting in the following comment provided by our Harbors, Beaches and Parks (HBP) Program Planning Division: Huntington Harbor is largely a private residential harbor and currently has little in the way of recreation/open space and visitor-serving commercial land uses. We cannot support the proposed land use change for this reason. However, if the project moves forward, we recommend that it be conditioned to provide for retention of the existing beach area for public use. This should be in the form of a vertical accessway irrevocably offered to the City of Huntington Beach from harner Avenue to the beach, and a lateral easement over the beach also to be irrevocably offered to the City. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the proposed amendment. Tf you have questions regarding these recommendations, please call. Fric Jessen or the HBP Program Planning Office at (714) 563-4990. Very truly yours, Joan S. Golding, Program Manager Regional Coordination Office By: ari A. Rigon , . Planner D(JN TY C3 F CH: tk 0101707440366 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA O S 4.195 y R1OE COUNT P.O. 80X 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 962-2411 October 22, 1990 Thomas Rogers Assistant Planner City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 90-4 Negative Declaration No. 90-22 bEPARTPC COMMUNITY PLANNII„ ' 12 ..1ggo This is in response to your September 26, 1990 notice that the City is analyzing General Plan Amendment No. 90-4 and Negative Declaration No. 90-22. This is a change to your July 25, 1990 notice of a similar action, except that this proposal allows three separate alternatives, the most significant of which includes up to sixty-five condominium or apartment units on the 2.6 acre site of the existing Huntington Harbor Bay Club, located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane. This area is within County Sanitation District No. 11, and previous planning has shown medium density residential usage for this parcel. You are requested to calculate the expected sewage to be generated from the proposed development and compare it to the District's previous plans. For your calculations, use the flow coefficients of: - 1615 94llons per day per acre (gpd/acre) for low density residential (4-7 d.u. acre); - 5880 gpd/a:re for medium-high density residential (17-25 d.u./acre), and - 200 gpd/acre for recreation and open space usage. The closest County Sanitation District No. 11 sewer line is the existing 21-inch VCP Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Phase II, located in Los Patos Avenue, which begins at the end of a 12-inch local force main in Warner Avenue. The gravity flow continues from Los Patos to Bolsa Chica Road, to Warner Avenue, to Springdale Street and ends at the Slater Avenue Pump Station. This pump station is the immediate bottleneck in the District's system. It must he replaced before significant sewage flow increases can come on-line. The soonest that the Slater Avenue Pump Station can be upgraded is in late 1992. This project, however, does not appear to be a significant increase, even with a maximum of sixty-five condominum or apartment units. Therefore, it should not present a problem at this time. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Thomas Rogers October 22, 1990 Page Two 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 82728.8127 17141962.2411 1JJa,stewater generated within the District's service area is processed at treatment plants 1 • .,`I in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. The Districts operate un`x' an NPDES permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Boaru and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. This permit has a set discharge limit for biochemical oxygen demand (BOO) and suspended solids (SS). At the present time, the BOO in the Districts discharge is close to the limit, therefore, significant land use changes will impact the Districts facilities and, particularly, industrial and commercial users should take on-site measures to reduce the load strength of the sewage. Commercial and residential users should incorporate all practical and mandated water conservation measures. The ability of the Sanitation Districts to provide sewage collection, treatment and disposal services for this development is dependent on the continued expansion of treatment plans and disposal capacity. All Sanitation Districts treatment projects require a Permit to Construct (PTC) from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD has adopted an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) which conditions the issuance of PTC's for sewage treatment plant capacity expansions. Conformity of all cities and the County with the AQMP is one of the conditions which must be satisfied. Therefore, your CEQA compliance document should address the issue of conformity of this project with the AQMP. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Gepal Plan Amendment No. 90-4 and Negative Declaration No. 90-2 Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering TMD:CW:sjl COURTNEY AND EDPEWATER LANES HOMEOWNERS GROUP 17220 Courtney Lane Huntington. Beach, CA 92649 (714) 840-3802 (714) 840-1092 FAX (714) 968-2472 """*5!'p2'v'TTZEr,.VCtyV „1'.',,iJ:f•: w. September 24, 1990 a' Ms. Julie Osugi Planning Aide 2 9G Planning Department DE,A-iTrIVE Ir City of Huntington Beach CQMMUN1_ DEV . 2000 N. Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Environmental Assessmen t Form # 90-22 Dear Ms. Osugi: I am writing to you on behalf of 47 homeowners (copy of names attached) regarding Environmental Assessment Form # 90-22. it was our opinion that it would be more expedient to send you one letter than 47 letters. We have reviewed your recommendations regarding the above referenced form #90-22. We disagree with your recommendations and some of your findings and strongly feel an Environmental Impact Report should be mandatory for this project. We based our comments on the following: 1. Phase, I and Phase II of the Coultrup project are being built utilizing a 1982 EIR which only addressed the construction of 42 condominiums. .It d_d_iot address the destroying of the Beach Club, building of 19 additional single family homes, loss of Recreation Open Space, parking, traffic, views, reconfiguration of the public beach, public access, patented state tide lands, seisnLic issues, the changing of the pierhead lines and transfer of adjacent property. 2. We do not understand how the City can amend the City's Local Coastal Program by modifying the Land Use Plan and .implement a redesignation from visitor-Serving Commercial and Recreational Open Space to Medium-Density Residential without conducting an Environmental Impact Report. Is this in the best interest of the surrounding neighbors and residents and is it the correct action for a public serving city planning department? wo r d A. Page 1, Section 1, a. There is significant new data regarding faults on this property and known geological and seismic factors. Was this new information reviewed by you or anyone on staff? There is also a tremendous amount of new data from the Bolsa Chica study which has been filed with the county planning office; was this data reviewed which shows identification of active faults and earth movements directly across Warner Avenue from this project. B. Page 5, number 8 Land use for residential is not compatible because the site consists of patented state tidelands (See letter from Les Grimes) Therefore, the land can only be used for navigation, fishing or commerce. Residential housing is strictly prohibited. Also, the 1.50 acres Visitor Serving Commercial may not be significant to the city of Huntington Beach but it is v,ry significant to Huntington Harbour residents. This- is one of the last Visitor Serving Commercial spaces in the Harbour. We hope you will strongly consider this point. C. Page 5, Number 13, a. We would like to review your traffic study. We don`t believe there will be no significant impacts to Scepter, Warner, Edgewater and Courtney Lanes. D. Page 8, Number 18 The view corridor is being reduced from 214 feet to 57 feet. How can this not be'a negative impact? Also, what do you mean ". . views may be greatly altered... these issues will be addressed through the entitlement process..? E. Parking We do not see where the site plan or your report addresses the issue of parking specifically: homes? 1. Where is the guest parking for the 19 single, family 2. Where is parking, provided for the public marina and boat owners? Page 3 3. Where is the public parking and access required by the California Coastal Commission for public access to bulkheads and beach? This is a very important issue. Was it fully analyzed by staff? We also can not find in your report any information on what the new pierhead line is being changed to. Has it been approved by the California Coastal Commission? Why is it being changed? What impact will it have on the channel width and turning basin? In conclusion, we disagree with the planning department's determination that a negative declaration be filed for this project. A new EIR should be done to address all relevant issues for this last building site in Huntington Harbour. Only then can we the citizens and the City of Huntington Beach be assured this project is appropriate and compatible with existing housing and surroundings. We look forward to your respon.:e to the above referenced items. sincerely, Michael Cavallo cc: Michael Uberuaga Courtney and Edgewater Lanes Homeowners Group District Attorneys Office Johnathan Lehrer-Graiwer California.Coastal Commission i Dale & Kathy Kramer 17041 Courtney Lane Anita Scrofani 17206 Courtney Lane Don & Don Klein 17186 Courtney Lane Maureen Mitchell 17042 Courtney Lane Bob Hansen 17158 Courtney Lane Frank & Donna George 17178 Courtney Lane Dick and Marilyn Willsie 17187 Roundhill Dinko & Marty Klarins 17164 Edgewater Lane Charles and Helen Davis 16302 Wildfire Circle Dr. Ed and Barbara Devlin 17156 Edgewater Lane Rochelle and Jon Morrison 17142 Courtney Lane Sharon and Tony Ivicevic 17130 Courtney Lane Bill and Lucy Sosnowski 17198 Courntey Lane Dr. Joseph Scheitzach 17220 Courtney Lane Russell Williams 17180 Edgewater Lane Beena and Dan Barton 17170 Courntey Lane Jay Sneslon 17132'Edgewater Lane ,Terry & Jenette Stelzer 17148 Edgewater Lane Mary Ellen Houseal 16952 Baruna Lane Harold & Dorie Lynn 17122 COURTNEY Lane Susie and Sid Newman 17120 Courntey Lane KARP C/O Don Troy 5272 Allstone Drive Cec Hubbard 4057 Aladdin Circle Ralph Bauer 16511 Cotuit Circle Robert and Suzzanne Mc Gee 16991 Malta Circle Gloria Jennings 17011 Malta Circle Ronald & Claudia Winger 17051 Malta Circle - Gus and Wanda Stiles 17021 Malta Circle Henry and Vane Bayhi 17001 Malta Circle, Peter and June Economakos 17031 Malta Circle Jack and Shirley Leverenz 17071 Malta Circle Paula R . Fullmer 17041 Malta Circle COURTNEY AND'RDGEWATER LANES HOMEOWNERS,=GRO Bob and Delores Crooks 17101 Malta Circle Dr. George & Mary Higue 3351 Bounty Circle John and Patricia Klein 16971 Courtney Lane Larry and Connie Weisenthall 17031 Courtney Lane John and Doris Kerkes 17171 Westport Bob and Kathy Struber 17071 Courntey Lane Virginia Whipple 16991 Courntey Lane Jeff and Diane Statton 17072 Courntey Lane Ron and Lisa Shafer 17186 Westport Joe Rosen 16915 Edgewater Lane Stu.'Zuck 3882 Sirius-Drive CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON Subject BEACH Julie Osugi Planning Aide GPA NO. 90-4, ZC NO. 90-5 EA NO. 90-22 From Dennis Groat '7 V Deputy Fire Marshal/Dev. Date September 13, 1990 The proposed amendment will have a minor impact on fire and medical aid response. The response time to the project from Warner Fire Station is two (2) minutes. The primary response route is Warner Avenue. This project, in and of itself, will not necessitate an increase in Fire Department personnel and apparatus, but grouped together with other developments in the area it will have significant impact on the availability and response times of emergency fire and medical units. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at ext. 5566. DG/sr 0545/4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To: JULIE OSUGI, Planning Aide Ik From : JIM MOORE, Department Analyst Sr. Subject: General Plan Amendment Date: August 6, 1990 Number 90-4 and Zoning Change Number 90-5' Construction of these 19 condominiums and one single family home would generate an anticipated eleven police calls for service per year. Additional resources would not be necessary for this increased workload. A l I O 71990 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEIgTi PLANNING DIVISIOP! w O CEO p P.O. BOX 1026 «HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 a PH: (714) 847-3581 FAX : (714) 841-4660 c %SPOSI,t July 31, 1990 fl90 City of Huntington Beach Dr -F.: 1x;,y Planning Department eo,wurc r r 2000 Main Street pLf:•:r:. clV;a; :. Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Re: Your letter of July 25, 1990 Dear Julie: We would not anticipate any problems with your General Pl.an Amendment No. 90-4, Zone change No. 90-5, and Environmental Assessment No. 90-22. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Tim Skeber Field Representative TS/j w SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA gC1S COMPANY ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION • P O. BOX 3334, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 9280.3 July 26, 1990 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Julie Osugi r,O Subject: EIR - General Plan Amendment 90-4 Zone Change 90-5, Environmental Assessment 90-22 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project, but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be served from an existing main as shown on the attached atlas sheet without affil significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condi- tion under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Residential S stem Area Avers e Yearl y Single-family 1095 therms/year./dwelling unit Multi-family 4 or less units 640 therms/year/dwelling unit Multi-family 5 or more units 580 therms/year/dwelling unit These estimates are based on gas consumption in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company during 1975 and it should not be implied that any particular home, apartment or tract of homes will use these amounts of energy. This is particularly true due to the State's insulation requirements and consumers' efforts toward energy conservation. ik Estimates of gas usage for non-residential projects are developed on an individual basis and are obtained from a Market Services Staff representative by calling (714)634-3180. We have developed several programs which are available , upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most energy efficient appliances or systems for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy programs , please contact this office for assistance. Sincerely, BiGlines'f`~ Technical Supervisor DB/du attachment 4. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN ` Governor.;.. STATE LANDS COMMISP.ZON 1807 13TH STREET SACRAMENTO , CALIFORNIA 95814 May 31, 1990 File Ref.: SD 90-05-08 Mr. Mike Ca•vallo Cavallo, Cambridge & Landon 18350 Mt. Langley, Suite 202 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mike: We have reviewed the materials you furnished regarding Huntington Harbor Bay Club, along with material in our files and our title plant. Based on this review, we feel the development is within validly patented Tide Land Location 221 and as such, is subject to the public trust easement in favor of commerce, navigation and fishing. Previously, there has been two major transactions in the Huntington Harbor area. These being: 1. Boundary Line Agreement 18 - An agreement as to the low water lines of the tidal streams within the Tide Land Location. 2. Sovereign Land Location 34 - An agreement by which the State relinquished title to the low water streams and gained title to the significant waterways in the present development. Neither of these transactions released the Huntington Harbor Bay Club property from tideland status and therefore did not extinguish the tideland easement. If you have questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, LESLIE H. GRIMES, Deputy Chief Division of Land Management and conservation cc: J. F. Trout Southern California Edison Company .'I ; P. 0. BOX 2069 7333 BOLSA AVENUE WESTMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92683.1269 August 3, 1990 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Julie Osugi SUBJECT : GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4, ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-5, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-22 Dear Mrs. Osugi: In response to your letter dated July 25, 1990, the Southern California Edison Company finds no impact to our Company for the subject proposed amendment. Southern California Edison Company has existing high voltage lines available to serve this project. These lines are located on Warner Avenue and are available to serve this project. The size and location of additional equipment needed to serve this pro- ject will not be established until we know the load requirements of the project. There are no outstanding mitigation measures for which Southern California Edison Company recommends be imposed on this proposed project. Ver37truly y urs, 91 ARNOLD E. TACY, II Service Planner AET:LS DISTRICT OFFICE SERVING: CORONA DEL MAR • COSTA MESA • FOUNTAIN VALLEY • HUNTINGTON BEACH MIDWAY CITY • NEWPORT BEACH • ROSSMOOR • SEAL BEACH • SUNSET BEACH . WESTMINSTER ...e J. mow - A ug-. vs yr a. _.Qi24 :rv`.'Kx'HiF ?.`$rY.2 -xl 4WJ.fi,.:'+-?'.'1A ^"':i"g't a.Y..: .-.-: tn`y.:xx.ii'&• x :Sa•.vX.i14=;tl"R`+SYtt7N_: STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RES6URCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Marine Resources Division 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 Long Beach, CA 90802 (213) 590-5186 September 17, 1990 Ms. Julie Osugi Planning Aide City of Huntington Beach Planning Division 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: General s?lan Amendment No 90-4/Zone Change No. 90-`1. Code Amendment No. 90-51 Environmental Assessment 90-22. Dear Ms. Osugi: 1990 We have reviewed the subject proposal and site plans which depict the type of development being proposed. A site specific development proposal will be submitted at a later date. The proposed general plan amendment would change permitted uses from Visitor-Serving Commercial and Recreation/Open Space to Medium Density Residential. The eventual construction of residences in this area could impact an existing beach area. However, if the residences are constructed in the area depicted on the site plans there should be no significant impact to existing intertidal and subtidal marine resources and habitats. Upon the submission of a site specific development plan, we would appreciate receiving a description of the proposal and site specific plans, prior to the issuance of permits, to determine if construction related impacts to marine and terrestrial resources and habitats would occur. If the project would result in impacts to marine and terrestrial resources and habitats, we would recommend project modifications to eliminate or reduce identified impacts. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Richard Nitsos, Environmental Coordinator for Marine Resources. The phone number is (213) 590-5174. Sincerely, Richard A. Klingbe I Acting Program Man ger Southern California Operations GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor Sties rry k DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RE Ul ! "P. D E14 , TO:Cmm Vitc, -.V11- FROM:--7p e fS C'.EXT. COMMENTS : Use Att 'a meints if necessary) UJETE:_/'-? r, PETITION(S):(4 '4 REQUEST ( S ) : M ? t' t' l M,4! m tr i wr w:G,N4C?5+:Y+ eC,t;c.M'"1 `ice"y"-*+d!S'asat. y v l l tr J16I , e 4 ? •s -n(_ f rY.i„11t1v A, LOCATION: ZONE:tn_ 44pJ° QkA UGNr ;xHL YLHLV:+t _ EXISTING USE: yy DATE ACCEPTED: MANDATORY ROCESSING DATE: i, 1 eeiu,e submit your concerns and ,ecommended solutions in writing can or before Interdepartmental REview: Final Planning Review: BZA: --- Subdivision Cbwmittee Planning Comidssion• Re V'se submitted by: Date:B (T 9'a Attachments: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RE TO: FROM :l -. 4 G',f y DATE:,.q-m EXT. ) PETITION(S): m A REQUEST (S): 4n ,-Av-vx ale-, vt 4,w 4 r ,- ,aitl ,, 5 r* LOCATION: l11 EXISTING USE: kbC :tip Cr 1 DATE ACCEPTED: MANDATORY ..ROCESSING DATE: I' 1 ease submit your concerns and recommended solutions in writing r)n or before /f _ Interdeparbnenta1 REview: Final Planning Review: i BZA: Subdivision ramiittee: Planning Crnxnission C0914ENTS : GVse Attachments necessary) + Response submitted by: Date: Attachments: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE:OCT 22 1990 TO:Bruce Crosby, Civil. Engineering Assistant FROM:Jim Ott::rson, Traffic Enbineee / -b n q SUBJECT:0INITIAL STUDY REVIEW !/ 6 P N lO -L The subject development application has been reviewed to determine the necessity of a traffic impact study. The results of our review are presented below. Estimated AM PK HR PM PK HR DAILY traffic 15 2 generation: (This is only a preliminaF,' trip generation estimate.) This project will NOT require a Traffic ImI act Study. Our review indicates that the project generated traffic woull represent less than 1 percent of the total cumulative peak hour traffic entering and key intersection and NO potential cumulative traffic impacts are anticipated. This project WILL require a Traffic Impact Study. The study shall analyze both a.m. and p.m. peak hours including new existin eak hour counts at the key intersections listed below North/South Street East/West Street Please forward this information to the Case Planner and the Applicant. Traffic Engineering Ref. No.5" •-, Bruce Crosoy INITIAL STUDY REVIEW Page Two Insufficient Yes Maybe No N/A Information Will the project result in traffic congestion? Will the project cr,_/ior exper ence access problems as designed? Does the circulation within the development provide an unacceptable level of safety required for the orderly flow of people and their vehicles? ADDITIONAL REMARKS: el 11 -7 S'-F, -s eat /6 ea " e4l -) 9Lazzl"I,, 3 6 ct f, d&-714-10 OR h 41n-30)-, ?2m--4 /,e 49 - 3'y - 90 PM- /7 Traffic E gineering Ref. o.(J-•-r ecj(/ lLYl1 - // °vlzu-2_ LU d GJ1 S S j? 0 GGr L 61uwt-- 25208 C/C 7- _ 7C hl1-ate 0 7- CITY O F HUN T INGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Subject Mike Adams Community Development Director NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 From Raymond C. P' ar Fire Chief b C(. NHYGENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 Date October 13, The proposed development will have a minor impact on fire and medical aid responses. Response time to the project from the Warner Fire Station is one and one half (1-1/2) minutes. The primary response route is Warner Avenue. IMPACTS Alternative #1: Retaining the existing use will have negligible impacts on the fire Department. Alternative #2: A Low Density Residential alternative may present problems in access and fire suppression. Fire lanes and Fire Department access must be maintained, and residential fire sprinkler systems are Mandatory in all dwellings over five thousand (5,000 ) square feet )tal floor area. Alternative #3: A Medium High Density alternative presents the identical problems as Alternative #2. It would necessitate fire sprinklers throughout the development, a greater rate of water delivery, and a means for providing alarm warnings to both the occupants and the Fire Department. Access for fire apparatus and personnel is a concern in projects of this size and density, as response times may be impacted. In and of itself, this project will not necessitate an increase in Fire Department apparatus and personnel, but grouped together with the future developments planned for the area, it may impact the availability and response times of emergency fire and medical aid units. In order to reduce these potential impacts to an acceptable level, any new development at this site should contribute towards foe "Opticom" traffic control system. If you require further information, please advise. RCP/DG/sr cc: Tom Rogers, Assistant Planner Dennis Groat, Deputy Fire Marshal 0777f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON B(ACH To Subject Co unity Development Water Operations Manager Mike ms From Jeffrey R. Renna GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT No. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 9022 Date October 15, 1990 the proposed amendment (90-4) will have an impact on the water system. Any additional new developments connecting to the water system will only create additional burdens. These deficiencies in the water system, identified in the 1988 Water System Master Plan, indicate that the following conditions may not be met, whic11-1 could affect this development: o Peak hour demands cannot be met unless the mitigation measures identified in the 1988 Water System Master Plan are addressed or constructed. o Current supply sources (water wells and importing facilities) are not sufficient to meet existing demands. o Existing storage facilities are inadequate for existing or ultimate needs. If you have any questions, or we can be of further assistance, please contact Eric R. Charlonne of my staff at extension 5921. JRR:ERC:gd 1990' Gta •ptEPIT rE DEVFJ.oPyE N11VGOLVISIOR CdTY OF HUN T ING TON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Subject Mike Adams, Director Community Development General Plan amendment #90-4 Negative Declaration #90-22 From Date Bruce Crrsby 0 Civil Engineering Assistant October 16, 1990 In regard to your memo dated September 27, 1990, we have the following concerns and comments: 1. Sewer pump station #9 at edgewater and Warner is pumping 100% of its capacity. This station needs to be upgraded to handle the flows. The City should hold off on any building in this area. 2. This project would have little impact on Warner Avenue traffic depending on layout. It may increase traffic on local streets to the west. 3. There are no storm drain problems at this time. Project would be required to drain into bay. 4. Water is available to the project area. 5. We did not receive Traffic Department's comments by the October 15, 1990 deadline. BC:dw cc: Louis Sandoval Robert Eichblatt 2587g/23 RECEIVED OCT 161990 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON 9EACH Subject M/' 6__T Louis Sandoval, Director Fick Mike Adams, Director Public Works Date GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 Community Development September 27, 1990 The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City's analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs, swimming pools, beaches, recreation centers, restaurants end banquet facilities . R E Ls ' ' I) DEPT OF PUBLICwKS OCT 11990 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: The nature and magnitude of any problems associated with the proposed and alternative land uses on streets , sewers, water system or storm drains. -- Location and size of existing water, sewer and storm drain systems currently serving the project area. - If necessary, the location and type of improvements needed to provide service to the above mentioned proposed and alternative land uses. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. MA:TR:lp Attachment (7317d) (1003D) variables HUNTINGTON BEACH Subject CITY OF HUNT INGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Mike Adams From Community Development Director Raymond C. P' a2 Fire Chief GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 Date October NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-22 LC-,- The proposed development will have a minor impact on fire and me aid responses. Response time to the project from the Warner Fire Station is one and half (1-1/2) minutes. The primary response route is Warner Avenue. IMPACTS Alternative #1: Retaining the existing use will have negligible impacts on the Fire Department. Alternative #2: A Low Density Residential alternative may present problems in access and fire suppression. Fire lanes and Fire Department access must be maintained, and residential fire sprinkler systems are mandatory in all dwellings over five thousand (5,000) square feet total floor area. Alternative /13: A Medium High Density alternative presents the identical problems as Alternative #2. It would necessitate fire sprinklers throughout the development, a greater rate of water delivery, and a means for providing alarm warnings to both the occupants and the Fire Department. Access for fire apparatus and personnel is a concern in projects of this size and density, as response times may be impacted. In and of itself, this project will not necessitate an increase in Fire Department apparatus and personnel, but grouped together with the future developments planned for the area, it may impact the availability and response times of emergency fire ^nd medical aid units. In order to reduce these potential impacts to an acceptable level, any new development at this site should contribute towards the "Opticom" traffic control system. If you require further information, please advise. RCP/DG/sr cc: Tom Rogers, Assistant Planner Dennis Groat, Deputy Fire Marshal 0777f CITY OF HUNTINGT O N BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To: Tan Rodgers . Assistant Planner From: Bruce Crosby Civil Engineering Assistant - Subject: GPA #90-4 ZC #90-5 4121 WARNER Date : October 24, 1990 The following are Traffic Department's concerns for project subject: Existing 81 condos - 45 AM and 53 PM, 540 ADT. 1. Existing conditions on Sceptre Lane are anitted from the report provided. 2. Security type entry fails to provide turn-around for visitor vehicles. 3. "Fire Department Entrance" on Warner Avenue must be a crash gate type entry, not available for public use. BC:ik RECEIVE DEPAR'CME:STOF COMMUNITY DEVELOP-NT PLANNINGDWV'SION Traffic Engineering Reference #900813 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTiNGTON BEACH To : Mike Adams Director Community Development From: Bruce Crosby Civil Engineering Assistant Subject : G P A #90-4 N D #90-22 (11UNTINGTON HARBOUR BAY CLUB SITE) Date : October 25, 1990 The following concerns and ccmnents from the Traffic Department are in response to your memo dated September 27, 1990: Alternative 1 - No project existing facilities have been adequate to handle the activities of the Beach Club, including banquets, weddings, etc. No new facilities are required under this alternative. Alternative 2 - 17 single family dwelling, AM peak 16 trips, PM peak 21 trips, total 193 A D T. The access for the alternatives chat create new dwelling units will be taken from Sceptre Lane, an existing street onto Warner Avenue, serving 89 townhanes, and from Warner Avenue where turns will be limited (no left out restriction). Alternative 2 will not require additional facilities to accanodate new traffic generated. Alternative 3 - 65 units, condo or apartments. Condo AM 38 trips, PM 44 trips, 449 A D T. Apartments AM 30 trips, PM 32 trips, 24-hr 398 A D T. This alternative would exceed the capacity of Sceptre L:'ne t-) G xvice the exist- ing and proposed traffic. A second street access to Warner Avenue would be required. As stated in #2 above, full access cannot be provided. Therefore, this alternative must be rejected on the basis of inadequate access. BC:ik REUr_'1V' 0CT 2 91990 D[PARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION J DEVELOPMENT REVIEW R13 Ui_r '^u1, r t P•-tea. F p•B14 . TO: FROM: ( Q P.EXT. Cl1l1ENTS : (Use Attachments if DATE:A -- / 5 - r7l PETITION (S): C_°*p REQUEST (S):F t e r 1'7r necessary) • 7J E E C o C IL.f s .-¢h:'ti:l.,'..C,t'Z..i'L• a. " 1`'"iS'i'''"',--r:./k's`G7'a c.' • .4«N . 'Ca•• ..-9T t1 !G a °JkVi `+eSl 17Yv1 l Jv• j /) LOCATION: .} ^ i f .' * r e t f :4w pi I - P ZONE:S'I 4(ti1 l4or"RC.{t " GENERAL PLAN: EXISTING USE:' ^advl a"c.e vv DATE ACCEPTED: MANDATOP .Y PROCESSING DATE:. i' 1 onser: subrni t your concerns and recommended solutions in writing can or before Interdepartmental REview. Final Planning Review: AZA: -subdivision Committee: Planning Crnmission: _____ . , r , 1g9C3 pr,E, NINi DIVISION HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT -PLAN CHECK CONCERNS D ATE J 7- 4f i'4 C GRID ZZ,f PLAN CHECK #9D -'Al . - S - ADDRESS __ / r4 TP E, The items chocked below indicate the requirements of the Fire Department , which are a condition of approval for development and MUST be complied with prior to issuance of building pt'rmits. NOTE ON PLANS - Automatic sprinkler systems will be installed throughout. to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. (/3 -D NOTE ON PLANS - A Class Ill wet standpipe system (combination ) will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards . Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. NOTE ON PLANS - A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation . The system will provide the following Manuai Pulls Water flow , valve tamper and trouble detection [ ] 24 hour supervision [ ] Smoke Detectors Annunciation ( ] Graphic Display Audible Alarms ( ] Voice Communication ( I NOTE ON PLANS Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. NOTE ON PLANS - 0 fire hydrants will be installed prior to combustible construction . Shop dr awings will be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire , Department prior to installation. NOTE ON PLANS - Elevators will be sized to accommodate an ambulance gurney. Minimum 6' 8' wide by 4'3" deep with minimum -f 42" opening. NOTE ON PLANS - Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with Hunting t on Beach Fire Department Standard No. 415. NOTE ON PLANS - Security gates will be designed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department Standard No. 403. 1046 (10/89)PAGL I 0 NOTE ON PLANS - Address numbers will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. The size of the numbers will be the following: The number for the building will be sized a minimum of ten (10) inches with a brush stroke of one and one-half (1-1/2) inches. Individual units will be sized a minimum of four (4) inches with a brush stroke of one-half (1/2) inch. NOTE ON PLANS - Inste'lat3on or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tank, will comply with Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department Standards. SHOW ON PLANS - Dimensions for Fire Access. Includes 24' or 27' fire lanes, turnarounds and 17' by 45' radius turns. Attached is Huntington Beach Fire Department Standard No. 401. SHOW ON PLANS - Street Names. Names of streets must be approved by the Huntington beach Fire Department prior to use. "• ^' ire Department Standard 409 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN - Submit to the Fire Department for approval a Fire Protection Plan containing requirements of Fire Department Specification #426. OTHER - L Q. to k .J b e C a ;'-'e - e L- It 1 '-D. o ' s4 A A r. I f you have any questions, please contact the Fire Prevention Division at (714) 536-541 1. SIGNED L44..S 4:ZA TITLE 1046 (10/89)PAGE 2 NA ip tJrgd s firms IoaiNnu. ENVIRONMENTAL A7;, iIAGEMENT AGENCY pact 0 • T Seeteta ti Exee. Asst. LL DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Secrelu L1 Exec,Asst. PLANNING COMMISSION ADVANCE PLANNING LandPlannin 13 ElementPlumtin Consistent ReviewL GrowthM'mt. CURRENT PLANNING Zonis,Administration Public Counter Site Plannin COASTAL&COMMU 1 G Air or Land Use Coin sio CoastalPle.D Coma t 1'. Rec.&O nS acePl .0 Gra hics ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Road/Jail Pro'ects Landfill/Parks[7 Corridor/Flood DIRECTOR OF REGULATION Secreta Exec.Asst.0 Rc' Support] SUBDIVISION _ Tent.Ma Streel Draina eD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PublicCounter Blde.PlunCk. Gradin AcottsticsL1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Water ual.L]Env,StudiesONVaterPollutiono ENFORCEMENT UrnrIJseSvcs. S c.Svcs. 'PROPERTY PERMITS -l Floo arks S c.Proc. .JG. INSPECTION (So. Count Re . Br. ClericalSu ort Cashier Zonin Bid .Pl.Ck. Gradin Res./Comm. Struct. 0 Plumb./Mech. Elect. DIRECTOR OF HARBORS BEACHES & PARKS Secretarv Exec.Asst. PROGRAM PLANNING Plan&Ac uis.C S c,Disl./LcaseAdm. Historical/Cultural DESIGN Rec.Fac, REGIONAL PARKS OPERATIONS UrbanD Wild./Nat.L Hist.3 c.Pro . COASTAL FACIL.!OPEN SPACE/TRAILS CoastE] CSA/17]Cont.Adm.Ll 0 nS . DIRECTOR OFTRP:aSPORTATION Sect-eta 11 Exec .Asst.0 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Trans oration Plamtin RoudPro rams TrafficEn incerin SPECIAL DISTRICTS FCPP Assessments/CFD Remarks: Secretary REGIONAL COORD. PROG. OFFICF 1-I/CD PROGRAM OFFICE F or/S cialFracas P.o ramM't.1-1 Public \Vorks/ND' -1 Pro'ectMonitorin El Housin Pres.fl DIRECTOR OFADMINISTRATION Secreta FINANCIAL SERVICES Financial&Strate icPlannine Dud et&FinancialAnal sis Fin,O .5. Pa rolli l Pureh,1-1 Accts.Pav.C ContractsEl PettvCashl] DPCCashied:] PWCashi..t[] ACCOUNTING SERVICES 0 rations. EMA[? H/CDt! MANAGEMENTSERVICES Maw ement Anal sin Mana ementSit on ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES WPCCI Librarvll MailroomLl Su lied! COMPUTER SERVICES Central Files En inecrin &O(liceS items Plantain e'ulation & Admin. S stems S stemsAnal sis SvstenrsM t.0 PERSONNEL SERVICES DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SecretaryD Exec. Asst.EI Claimslnv. SAR PROJECT DESIGi' Flood Control Desi u Road Ri ht-of-Wa Utilities FLOOD PROGRAM !food Pro mmmitt Flood ProectsPlannin Federal Pro'ecis H droloe SURVEYOR Field Corn utation O ffice All Bar Surve or FederalPro'ects CONSTRUCTION Const.Admin.11 Contracts S cialPro'ectsi7 Materialstl OPERATIONS Maint.S stems Management FieldO rations Signature/Approval rl Investigation LI Information Comment O File El Recommendation ScheduleAppoimrnent C PrepareResponse Action CompleteBj 'ID' F0250-234.10(R51901 Building Division 536-5241 Planning Division 536-5271 City of Hunt i ngton Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALI FORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1990 Thomas Mathews, Director of Planning County of Orange EMA P. 0 . Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-4 NEGATIVE DECLP.ILATION NO. 90-22 Dear Mr. Mathews: The City's Department of Community Development is currently in the process of analyzing an amendment to the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan. The Proposed Amendment (90-4) consists of a land use change from Recreation/Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial to Medium Density Residential (15 units per acre). The subject property (Huntington Harbor Bay Club Site) is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, immediately east of Sceptre Lane and contains approximately 2.6 acres (please refer to attached location map). The site is currently occupied by several tennis courts, a beach area and a commercial banquet facility. The General Plan Amendment in itself does not constitute any new development; however, it would provide for future residential development (up to 39 units). The developer has proposed 19 single-family dwellings on the site. A conceptual site plan is attached for your review. As a part of the City`s analysis of the General Plan Amendment, alternative projects are evaluated to assess potential impacts to infrastructure and compatability with the surrounding land uses. The project alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: A no project alternative which would retain the site's Recreation /Open Space and Visitor-Serving Commercial uses. This would permit racquet and tennis clubs , swimming pools , beaches, recreation centers, restaurants and banquet facilities.RECEIVED O C T 3 '1990 EMA 1 General Plan No. 90-4 Page 2 Alternative 2: A Low Density Residential (6.5 u/gac) alternative would n1low for development of a maximum of 17 single-family dwellings. Alternative 3: A Medium High Density (25 u/gac) alternative would allow for development of a maximum of 65 condominium or apartment units on the subject site. In preparing our analysis, we will require some assistance from your office. Specifically, we would appreciate comments on potential impacts the proposed amendment and any of the alternatives may have on your service or jurisdiction. Please include in your reply the following information: Any comments you have on the impacts of the proposed and alternative land uses on the Bolsa Chica. Due to a limited time schedule for the preparation of the City's report, we would apreciate your comments by no later than October 15, 1990. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Thomas Rogers Assistant Planr, .r TR:ip Attachment (7239d) (1002D) variables 9-5-I1 DM 9 16-S-II_ OMlir- fI-.24-5 -12 io_a_n nn-S-IIPMJECT SITE :,21-5-II OM 28N I DM 21 - DM 2;w"24 ) 3U-5-11 I 29-s-11 '•\ 26;45-)I M 35 DM 34 1 ' Di 33 10. 5-11 ``I N14-5 •r11 ..; _ Cl? MD.11 22-I -II 2 .-5-1 1 24- I D 25 0 • DM 271 WA e VE. 27-5-II _01/32 5111 33-5-11 3c-, ll. 35.5 -II 36-5-II DM 06 OEr, 37 ! {bh 38 lb;r, 39 DM 40I 5-6-II 6-11- ' 3-6-II DM4 9-6-I1 DM10 OM3 25- -D DM 30M 3I 2I-H Q 2I O-6-II II- -II 12-i -il 7-6.a._-10 DM DM12 .DM13 DM 7 14.6-I I 13_ 6-I I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY . CALIFORNIA aY,ar --,a DhG14 "r . 24-6-I DM29 ZONING INDEX MAP LEGEND 19-6-10-SECTION -TOWNSHIP- RANGE 0M22-DISTRICT MAP 22 /•8-6-10 Oh18 18-6-10 / 17-6-10 DM120 DM19 19- -10 OJT CF-REDGEWATERPIERHEAD LINEWEATHERLY 5A? I-. - W a.m. r 0, 1 a mw..A(ALADDIN DR.w PROJECTAREA0;WARNERPROJECTSITE'(PHASE II)ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTNO, 90-22HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISIONREZONEFROMHHBCSPTO Rl-CZAVE.HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Huntington Beach - P.O. BOX 190 Thc czs Mc7 \ e s7 L,VI,4.1Ck Orr,5 M A P CA ?o Lf (/S