HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Amendment GPA1990004 - General Information-H\107?/S`
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTWCTON BEACH
Mike Adams , Director
Community Development From
PARKING INFORMATION FOR
Subject BAY CLUB AND PORTOFINO -COVE Date
BAY CLUB
Robert Franklin
Associate Planner
November 15, 1989
Attached is an exhibit which illustrates the parking requirements
and distribution for the Bay Club mixed use project. Also, a matrix
which identifies specific parking requirements is provided below:
LAND USE REQUIRED PROVIDED
TOTAL ON-SITE PARKING SPACES 281 327
Condominiums Tenant 72
36 Units @ 2.5/unit Guest 18 90
90
Marina Parking
164 Slips
128 Public slips @ .75/slip 96 96
Private slips 0 0
(assigned to each unit)
Banquet Facility (8,500 sq.ft.)85 85
Coastal Access Parking 10 10
281 281
Excess Parkir.g 46 (14%)
PORTOFINO COVE
A 131 space parking lot at the terminus of Countess Drive currently
serves the 60 condominium units (30 were included to accommodate
guests of the condominiums) and Seabridge Park.' The addition of 47
boat slips to a private residence does not require additional
parking. The proposed slips are for use by condominium residents
only and a covenant has been recorded to assure that slips are not
sold or rented separately from the residence.
STATISTICAL INFORMATION FOR
HUNTINGTON BAY & RACQUET ,CLUB
GROSS AREA 14.68 acres
GROSS LAND AREA !,2 acres
o-,PARKING
Marina:
Public Slips ,,. 116 @ .75
Pcivate Slips-- 42
-PUBLIC BEACH
spaces per slip - 07 spaces
parking provided in subter.y ainean
for residents
10 spaces allocated pursuant to Coastal'Commissionrequi.rements;,
CONDOM '`' L UH%
RESTAURANT
83 tables In restau rant/banquet e5 spactta.
TOTAL
PO 11cBeach 10 spac A
Marina 8
RestaurapE
5
05-90
Condominiums 105
7 equire8/307 j,roposed
?r i•p
1
I
SUMMARY OF
CHANGES REQUIRED TO PERMIT THE PROPOSED
BAYCLUB PHASE II PROJECT
Page Chan e Re uir d
28 Revise racquet and yacht club
inventory.
30 Remove racquet club w/dining
facilities from paragaraph #2.
102 Rewrite paragraph #1 of Mixed
Uses.
103 Add third category of Mixed
Development from Land Use
Element of General Plan.
109 Remove reference to the existing
boat and racquet club.
111
113
I (8789d)
Revise Exhibit to show beach
(Open Space/Recreation) area and
area for Medium Density
Residential.
Revise policy "a" to allow the
proposed uses.
SUMMARY OF
CHANGES REQUIRED TO PERMIT THE PROPOSED
BAYCLUB PHASE II PROJECT
Page
28
30
102
103
109
111
113
(8789d)
Chan e Re uired
Revise racquet and yacht club
inventory.
Remove racquet club w/dining
facilities from paragaraph #2.
Rewrite paragraph #1 of mixed
Uses.
Add third category of Mixed
Development from Land Use
Element of General Plan.
Remove reference to the existing
boat and racquet club.
Revise Exhibit to show beach
(Open Space /Recreation) area and
area for Medium Density
Residential.
Revise policy "a" to allow the
proposed uses.
RESOLUTION NO. 5341
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTIrNGTON BEACH ADOPTING COASTAL ELEMENT AMEND-
MENT NO. 83 -2 TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with
changing community needs and objectives; and
A public hearing on adopting of Coastal Element Amendment
No. 83-1 to the General Plan was held by the Planning Commission
on December 6, 1983, and approved for recommendation to the City
Council; and
Thereafter, the City Council after giving notice as pre-
scribed by Government Code Section 65355, held at least one public
hearing to consider said Coastal Element Amendment No. 83-2; and
At said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring
to be heard on said amendment were hard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of, Title 7,
Chapter 3, Article 6 of California Government Code, commencing
with Section 65350 , that Coastal Element Amendment No. 83-2 to the
General Plan, consisting of the following change, is hereby
adopted:
1. Two visitor -serving commercial nodes have been , designated for
the half blocks from, Pacific Coast Highway to the alley
between 16th and 18Lh Streets and between 8th and 9th
Streets.
2. The half blocks from Pacific Coast Highway to the alley
between 11th and 14th Streets have been redesignated high
density residential from visitor-serving commercial.
3. The area north of Pecan and :south of Hartford, between in
Street and Lake Street has been redesignated mixed use
office/residential from general commercial.
ADL: ps
12/13/83
i
Res. No. 5341
S'fA,i'I OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH , the duly elected , qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day
of Januar , 19 84 , by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson MacAllister Kell Finle Baile Mandic
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
NOT 'JOT1NG: Thomas
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
The for: ggnicg instrument is a correct
copy of the original on file in this office.
Attest----
ALICIA M. WENT11'olit H_
City C'.;k ;.fflcic Cl"of tile C."'q
Council of City cf fiurt:ngton Berh.
California.
By Deputy
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day of January 3 , 1984.
F.
or
ATTEST:
City Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney ;.
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
irector of Development
Services
RESOLUTION NO. 5327
A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING LAND USE ELEMENT
AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN NO. 83-3
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with
changing community needs and objectives; and
A public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amendment No.
83-3 to the General Plan was held by the Planning Commission on
October 4, 1983, and approved for recommendation to the City
Council; and
Thereafter the City Council , after giving notice as prescribed
by Government Code §65355, held at least one public hearing to con-
sider Land Use Element Amendment No. 83-3; and 5
At said hearing before the City Council all person srdesiring to
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach pursuant to provisions of Title 7 , Chapter 3,
Article 6 of California Government Code commencing with S 65350, that
Land Use Element Amendment No. 83 -3 consisting of the following
changes is hereby adopted:
1. That Section 5 .1.3 for Administrative Items is added to the
General Plan document . Administrative Items shall i nclude the
following:
1. Creation of new General Plan land use designations.
2. Minor word changes ifithin the General Plan document.
3. Procedure changes within the General Plan document.
4. Revisions to the Zoning and Land Use Consistency
be heard on said amendment were heard,
Matrix.
5. Interpretations of General Plan Land Use Map
boundaries.
2. That a new Estate Residential 0-3 units per acre designa-
tion is established.
3. That 40 .51 acres bounded by Ellis Avenue to the north,
Goldenwest Street to the east, the Estate Residential (0-4 units per
s
A"G:ps
1_,518 3 1•
,Rev.
acre) Land Use designation boundary to the south and Edwards Street
to the west are redesignated from Estate Residential (0-2 units per
acre) to Estate Residential (0-3 units per acre).
4. That 1.6± acres located at the southeast corner of Banning
Avenue and Magnolia Street immediately north of the Orange County
Flood Control Channel are redesignated from Industrial Resource Pro-
duction to Open Space.
5. That 37.6± acres bounded by Slater Avenue to the south,
Nichols Street and Oakview School to the west, a parallel line 145
feet norh of Mandrel Drive to the north, and a parallel line 300
feet west of Beach Boulevard to the east are redesignated from
Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential.
6. That 26.6± acres covered by the Pacific Community Specific
Plan and 4.40± acres covered by R-5 zoning, both areas generally
located on the south side of Main Street and 290 feet west of Beach
Boulevard, are redesignated from Office Professional to Mixed
Development; and that 4.17± acres covered by R-3 toning in the
vicinity of Shaffer and Palin Circles are redesignated from Office
Professional to Medium Density Residential.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
adjournedHuntington Beach at a/regular meeting thereof held on the 28th
day of November 1983.
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
-J
In'
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator ector of Development
Services
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
Rea. No.5327
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular adjourned meeting thereof held on the 28th day
of November ,19 83 , by the following vote:
AYES:Councilmen:
'n K F'
NOES:Councilmen:
A,
11
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
MacAllister (Thomas - out of room
Y. e
RESOLUTION NO. 5267
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING COASTAL ELEMENT AMEND-
MENT NO. 83-1 TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN
.WHEREAS, the City, Council of the City of Huntington Beach
desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with
changing community needs and objectives; and
A public hearing on adopting of Coastal Element Amendment
No. 83-1 to the General Plan was held by the Planning Commission
on April 19, 1983, and approved for recommendation tp the City
Council; and
Thereafter, the City Council after giving notice as pre-
scribed by Government Code Section 65355, held at least one public
hearing to consider said Coastal Element Amendment No. 83-1; and
At said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring
to be heard on said amendment were heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7,
Chapter 3,Article 6 of California Government Code, commencing
with Section 65350, that Coastal Element Amendment No. 83-1 to the
General Plan, consisting of the following change, is hereby
adopted:
That all housing policies and all discussion of housing
issues are removed from the Coastal Element.
ADL;ps
`/9/83
Res. No.5267
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa.:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of tl,e City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day
of , 19 83 , by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:It
i son Thomas Kell MacAllister 3aile Mandic
NOES: Councilmen:
N ne
ABSEI:T: Councilmen:
Finle
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach , California
a
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council. of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th
day of May ,1983.
Mayor
ATTEST:
62- 1 , -.111,
City Clerk 4./
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ci Attor
REVIEWED A _ APPROVED: INITIATED AND APP-ROVED:
City Administrator
d
irector of Development
Services
U
r
RESOLUTION NO. '5223
V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING IN PART LAND USE ELE-
MENT AMENDMENT NO. 82-1 TO THE CITY'S GENERAL
PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with
changing community needs and objectives; and
A public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amend-
ment No. 82-1 to the General Plan was held by the Planning
Commission on November 16, 1982, and continued to and closed on
December 7, 1182, and approved for recommendation to the City
Council; and
Thereafter, the City Council after giving notice as pre-
scribed by Government Code section 65355, held at least, one pub-
lic hearing to consider areas 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6 of said
Land Use Element Amendment No. 82-1; and
At said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring
to be heard on said amendment were heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE,IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach pursuant to provisions of Title 7,
Chapter. 3, Article 6 of California Government Code, commencing
with section 65350, that Area 2.4 of Land Use Element, Amendment
No. 82-1 to the General Plan, consisting of the following
change, is hereby adopted:
That 5.7 acres, located north of Warner Avenue between
Sceptre and Edgewater Lanes, be redesignated from open space to
mixed development subject to the following conditions:
1. Only residential and recreational uses are to be permitted.
2. The mixed use designation is to be implemented by a
specific plan.
1.
s
I 3. The maximum number of units permitted is forty-two (42).
4. The building and open space area must'conform to the
precise locations specified in attached Exhibits A and B.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th
day of February, 1983.
e')' N.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Administr for
Cit'At orney
,
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
D rector of Development
Services
Res. No,5223
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I
I. ALICIA M. WENTWORTE, the duly elected, qualified City
Clark of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day
of Februar , 19 83 , by the following vote:
AYES: Cbuncilment
Pattinson MacAllister Mandic Finle Baile Kell
J
NOES: Councilmen:
Thomas
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
z.
City Clerk and ex-officio'Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
The foregoing instrument is a correct
copy of the original on file in this office.
Attest I *'-,/ 19 f .i
ALICIA JM: WEN [WORTH
City Clerk and Ex-officio Clarkof the City
Council of the Clty of Huntington Beach.
Cal.
By 1 n Deputy
RESOLUTION NO. 5147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH REVISING THE COASTAL ELEMENT
OF THE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
desires to update and refine the Coastal Element of the General
Plan to meet the needs of the community better; and
A public hearing on the proposed changes and additions to
the element was held and a report on those changes and additions
was prepared by the Planning Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby
approves the changes and additions to the Coastal Element listed
in the Planning Commission's report, attached hereto and by this
reference made a part hereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2d day
of August, 1982.
Mayor,
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ity Clerk City Attorney W
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Adminis ra r
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
irector of Deve opment
Services
d
J
J
J
Res. No.5147
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa:
CITY OF HUNTI"NGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M . WENTWORTH, the duly elected , qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that -the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the ' 2nd day
of Au ust , 19 82 , by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson MacAllister, Mandic, Kelly
NOES: Councilmen:
Finle , Bailey
ABSENT: Councilmen:
Thomas
City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of ttfnjtoo loch, California
The foregoing instrument is a correct
copy of the original on file in this office.
t /3 i vA
Ciite Clerk and Ea-officio Clerk of the City
t cil of the City of Huntington Beach,
Deputy
I
6-
RESOLUTION NO. 4954
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY COUNCIL Oi l THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING, THE LOCAL COASTAL
PROGRAM IN THE FORM OF TilE COASTAL ELEMENT OF
THE GENERAL PLAN.
WHEREAS, California Public Resources Code Section 30500
requires all cities lying within the coastal zone to prepare
a local coastal program for that portion of the coastal zone
within their jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, said local coastal program must contain a land
use plan (California Public Resources Code Section 30108.6)
which may be submitted in the form of a coastal element to the
general plan (California Public Resources Code Section 30108.5):
and
WHEREAS, a coastal element has been prepared in compliance
with California Public Resources Code Sections 30000 through
;0900 and relevant guidelines adopted b y the State of California;
:utd
WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law and
the California Coastal Act of 1976, the Huntington Beach Planning
Commission and Huntington Beach City Council. have had separate
public hearings relative to the proposed adoption of the coastal
element: to the general plan, wherein both bodies have carefully
considered all information presented at said hearings, and after
due consideration of the findings and recommendat;ions of ';he
Planning Commission, including CitY Council amendments by chnn;ris
and additions listed in Attachments 1, 2 and 3, by this refeveric•cr
incorporated herein and made a part hereof', mid n l l e 1 ident,o,
presented to said City Council, the City Co.unccil finds thn+ onc'lr
locn L coastal program is proper, and internal l,y consistent 4v f t.h
the general plan;
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that thO City (:ounc't1, ut'
the City of Huntington Beach hereb y approves said coal*^1
element of the general plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of'
f{untington Beach at a regular
day of Januar , 1981.
Mayor
APPROVED AS To FORM:
City Clerk-
ATTEST:
meetir.n thereof' held on the 19th
C , At o n
REVIEWED AND APPROVEDt
C ty Admini trator
INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
45
Development vices Director.
"4'
Res. No. 4954
S'TA'LE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M . WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
.-L.11
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
The f91r'^^If'.` 1'1c.rw-t!('.n( i7 "c'rtti.t
copy of ties uriginal on fife un this office.
Attest F4 19000
City Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of M(' City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach,
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach , and ex-off'.cio Clerk of the
City Council of said City , do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a, regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day
of Januar , 19 81 , by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson , Finle , Thomas, Bailey , MacAllister, Mandic, Kelly
NOES: Coenciltwan:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
y
I-
8.40.030--8 .40.040
other than a fixed noise source.
(k) "Noise level" shall mean the "A" weighted sound pres-
sure level in decibels obtained by u..ing a sound level meter at
slow response with a reference pressure of twenty (20) micro-
pascals (micronewtons per square meter). The unit of measure-
ment shall be designated as db(A).
(1) "Person" shall mean a person, firm, association, co-
partnership, joint venture, corporation or any entity, public
or private in nature.
(m) "Residential property" shall mean a parcel of real
property which is developed and used either in part or in whole
for residential purposes, other than transient uses such as
hotels or motels.
(n) "Predominant tone noise" shall mean a noise character-
ized by a predominant frequency or frequencies so that other
frequencies cannot be readily distinguished.
(o) "Sound pressure level" of a sound, in decibels, shall
mean twenty (20) times the logghrithm to the base of ten (10) 'of
the ratio of the pressure of the sound to a reference pressure,
which reference pressure shall be explicitly stated.
(Ord. 2379, 1.8 Jul 79)
8.40.030 Noise level measurement criteria. Any noise
level measurements made pursuant to the provisions of this
chapter shall be performed using,a sound level meter as defined
in this chapter. The location selected for measuring exterior
noise levels shall be at any point on the property line of the
offender or anywhere on the affected property. Interior noise
measurements shall be made within the affected unit. The meas-
urement shall be made at a point in the affected unit at least
four (4) feet from the wall, ceiling or floor nearest the noise
source. All noise level measurements shall bra performed in
accordance with procedural rules and regulations of the Orange
Cbunty health department. (Ord. , 2379, 18 Jul 79)
8.40.040 Desi nated.noise zones. The properties herein-
after described, whether within or without the city, are hereby
assigned to the following noise zones:
Noise Zone 1: All residential properties;
Noise Zone 2: All professional office and public
21 5-3
J.
8.40. 050--8.40. 060
,institutional properties;
Noise Zone 3: All commercial properties with the exception
of professional office properties; and
Noise Zone 4: All industrial properties. (Ord. 2379,
18 Jul 79)
8.40 05,, Exterior noise standards. (a) The following
noise standards, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall
apply to all residential property within a designated noise
zone:
EXTERIOR NOISE STANDARDS
NOISE ZONE NOISE LEVEL TIME PERIOD
1 55 db (A)
50 db (A)
7 a.m . - 10 p.m.
10 p.m . - 7 a.m.
2 55 db (A)Anytime
3 6e db(A)Anytime
}
4 70 db (A)Anytime
(b) In the event the alleged offensive noise consists en-
tirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech, music, or
any combination thereof, each of the above noise levels-shall
be reduced by five (5) db(A). (Ord. 2788, 18 Sep 85;
Ord. 2379, 8/79)
8.40.060 Exterior noise levels rohibited. It shall be
unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated
area of the city to create any noise., or to allow the creation
of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise
controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when
measured on any residential, public institutional, profes-
sional, commercial or industrial property, either within or
without the city, to exceed the applicable noise standards:
(a) For a cumulative period of more than.thirty (30)
minutes in any hour;
(b) Plus 5 db(A) for a cumulative period of more than
fifteen (15) minutes in any hour;
216-4
8. 40. 070--3. 40. 080
(c) Plus 1.0 db(A) for a cumulative period of more than
five (5) minutes in any hour;
(d) Plus 15 db(A) for a cumulative period of more than one
(1) minute in any hour; or
(e) Plus 20 db(A) for any period of time.
In the event the ambient noise level exceeds any of the
first four noise limit categories above, the cumulative period
applicable to said category shall be increased to reflect said
ambient noise level. In the event the ambient noise level ex-
ceeds the fifth noise limit category, the maximum allowable
noise level under said category shall be increased to reflect
the maximum ambient noise level. (Ord. 2379, 18 Jul 79)
8.40.070 Interior noise standards. (a) The following
noise standards, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall
apply to all real property within a designated noise zone:
INTERIOR NOISE-STANDARDS
NOISE ZONE NOISE T,EVEL TIME PERIOD
1 55 db(A) 7 a.m. 10 p.m.
2, 3, 4
45 db(A! 10 p.m. - 7 a.m.
55 db;2,) Anytime
(b), In the event the alleged offensive noise consists en-
tirely of impact noise, sample tone noise, speech, music, or
any combination thereof, Each of the above noise levels shall
be reduced by five (5) db(A). (C d. 2788, 18 Sep 85;
Ord. 2379, 7/79)
_.
8.40.080 Interior levels of noise rohibited. It shall be
unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated
area of the city to create any noise, or to allow the creation
of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise
controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when
measured within any other structure on any residential, public
institutional, commercial, or industrial property to exceed:
(a) The noise standard for a cumulative period of more
than five minutes in any hour;
216-5
'90 09/05 09:01 ' 213 598 1577 COULTRUP 01
COULTRUP
Development Company
Pax #: (213) 598-1577
DATE : !/ < q 0
M
AX TRA AL
glob-/ 7 ":/1q
REFERENCE:
THERE Wi BE -7 PAGE(S) TO FOLLOW. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL
OF THE 1'1tCES, PLEASE CONTACT THE UNDERSIGNED.
*****;4•*** *-k***********tik*********************************il******
COMMENTS:/ A I? lY?G)
d Gd. -Z06
SENT BY:
13001 SeaWeach Boulevard • Suite 3Q0 • Seal Beach, California 90740 a (213) 430.8118 * Fax (213) 598-15.77
i
'90 09/05 09:01 ' ' 213 598 1577 COULTRUP RAJ 02
SEN1 BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017 B-01-90 1 12;15 7148551057-+ 212 598 151111# 1
90/664
August 31,, 1990
MEMO TO- KATHLEEN TE141CLA
SUBJECT: COMENd ON REQUIREMENTS OF }HUN'T'INGTON BEACH GENERAL
PLAN
Dear Ms, Terkla,
I have read the material stunt over for the
General Plan. There are several points you may wish to
consider;
1. In the language Of the plan the 60 LDN value
is to be used to trigger the need for an
acoustical study, The language is " 6OLDN
...implies that acoustical analysis could be
-required in areas where the optimum standard
ib exceeded ". There is never any mention of
using it as a design criteria for exterior
noise control,
2. The language goes or to say 11 ..... that
fi=QtAtAJ_ modifications could be noceseary".
The language statee further " These levels are
presented as guidelines in noise control to
determine what development proposals Could
need acoustical analysis and where ,,t tural
modifications for new development may be
nACeesary", It is clear in two plares the
Intent is to control only interior noise since
structural modifications only produce that
result.
Thus in your project, using these guidelines,
any reference or requirement for exterior noise control can
be deleted. However, you ghotuld be aware that the City has
not followed the General Plan provision for years. We
routinely receive instructions to consider exterior noise
control and to u,ee 65 CNEL (LDN) as the standard. A number
of projects in the vicinity were done on that baftis including
our 1983 analysis for the City for the widening of Warner.
Therefore, From m point of view the request to examine 60
LDN has revealed that strict use of those guidelines reduces
190 09 /05 09:02 '` 213 598 1577 COULTRUP
StNI SY ; XEROX r,lecopier '1017: B -31-90 ; 12 15 1 714835195'1-4
' 03
213 508 1077;# 2
90/654
the requirements on theproject and you R lay e1 inlinat.e the+sound walls listed in our report, The portion regarding
glazing modific4tions remains intact since it is based on the
guideline of 45CNEL(LON).
'90 09 /06 09:02 1 2 213 598 1577 COULTRUP [a 04
90/517
GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a noise impact and
design study of the proposed Bay Club Phase I1 project
located on Warner Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach.
Included in this report is a discussion of the expected
exterior community noise environment and the recommendations for
control of noise in the exterior and interior living areas.
A vicinity map showing the genRral location of the
construction site is presented on Exhibi -- Site Location Map.
The proposed development is 18 single fam detached buildings.
2.0 APPLICABLE NOISE CRITERIA
The City of Huntington Beach requires all residential
projects to conform to the requirements of Table I.
TABLE 1
APPLICABLE NOISE CRITERIA(')
Exterior... ._65 CNEL
Interior...... 45 CNEL
(1) Please see NOISE RATING METHODS (Appendix 1) for
a complete explanation of acoustical terminology.
1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California 92701 • Phone (714) 835-0249
FAX (714) 835.1957
09-05 _er,10r2'9AM F04
'90 09 /05 09 :03 '& 213 598 1577 COULTRUP !J 06
90/517
3.0 EXISTING NOISE LEVELS
3.1 ROADWAYS
A measurement was performed on the site. The
record of this measurement is attached as
Exhibit 2. Measurements are conducted using a Bruel and
Kjaer (B & K) Model 2209 Type 1 Sound Level Meter, a
B & K Model 2306 Strip Chart Recorder, and a B & K Model
4426 Statistical Noise Analyzer. The Average Noise
Level reported from this measurement was 7Q Leq. The
measurement was taken at a point 65 feet from the
centerline of Warner Avenue..
A ten minute traffic count was taken during
the measurement period. The results of that count are
given in Table 2.
FABLE
TEN MINUTE TRAFFIC COUNTS
AUTOS MEDIU M TRUCKS HEAVY TRUCKS TOTAL
TEN MINUTES 202 2 0 204
HOURLY E UIVALENT 1,212 12 0 1,224
PERCENTAGE 99.0 1.0 0 100.0
The primary function of the measurements is to
calibrate the Noise Model (FHWA RD-77-108) used to
compute the CNEL data.
The model relies on the, acoustical metric of
the Average Noise Level (Leq). By taking the traffic
count during the measurement , calculating the Leq value
for that sample, and comparing it to the measured
sample, i t is possible to calibrate the CNEL model for
any factors which are present and not adequately
identified in the prediction equations.
The computer print -out is attached in Appendix
2. The calculated levels and the measured level are
compared in Table 3 on the following page,
'91) 09/05 09:03 $ 213 598 1577 COULTRUP
TABLE 3
COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MFASU1U D
AVERAGE NOISE LEVELS
Calculated 70
Measured 70
DIFFERENCE 0
0 08
90/517
The calculated and measured values correspond.
Therefore, no corrections need be applied to the CNEL
calculations.
3.2 RAILROAD
There is no railroad near the site.
3.3 AIRCRAFT
There is no airport near the site.
3.4 STATIONARY
There are no stationary sources near the site.
4.0 DESIGN NOISE LEVELS
4.1 ROADWAY
The expected future roadway noise impact was
projected using the Federal , Highway Admini-
stration 's Highway Noise Prediction Model (L"HHWA RD-77-
108) together with several roadway and site parameters,
which determine the projected impact of vehicular
traffic noise , including the roadway crossection
(e.g. number of lanes ), the roadway active width', the
average daily traff i c (ADT), the vehicle travel speed,
the percentages of auto and truck traffic, the roadway
grade, the angle-of-view , the site conditions ("hard" or
"soft"), and the percent of total average daily traffic
which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour period.
The forecast traffic volume was obtained from
the Warner Avenue widening EIR at 42,000 AI)T.
0 ,4 b- ICG 10:::9a11U F106
'90 09 /05 09:04 %Y 213 598 1577 COULTRUP [I 07
90/517
The percentage of truck traffic was obtained
from a 1.987• Study of Thirty-one Arterial Intersections
by the County of Orange. The same source was used for
the distribution by the time of day. The data is listed
in Table 4.
TABLE 4
TRAFFIC INPUT DATA -- WARNER
% DAY % EVENING % NIGHT
Autos 75.51 12.57 9.34
Medium Trucks 1.56 .09 .19
Heavy Trucks .64 .02 .08
Volume 42,000 ADT
% VOLUME
100.0
100.0
100.0
The calculations are listed in Appendix 3.
The calculations yield a design noise level of 75 CNEL
at 50 feet from the centerline of Warner. The noise
contours are shown on Exhibit 3 to- the vacant site.
4,2 RAILROAD
Railroad noise is not expected to occur.
Thus, railroad noise will not impact the site.
4.3 AIRCRAFT
Aircraft noise is not expected in the future.
Thus, aircraft noise will impact the site.
4.4 STATIONARY
Stationary sources are not expected to impact
the site.
5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
S.1 EXTERIOR
The mitigation of exterior noise will require
a barrier along Warner since the levels will
exceed 65 CNEL. The assumptions for the barrier
calculations are listed in Table 5 on the following
page.
00-05-90 10:L9 fidd P07
1k
'90 09/05 09:04 '£ 213 598 1577 COULTRUP fj 08
90/517
TABLE 5
BARRIER ANALYSIS GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
FOR RECEIVER AND SOURCE GEOMETRY
R E C Es I p V RA S S U M P T IG.IIIIaas=_o-oo...avspG =.v..^__._-=_==.=qc_oo ,r= .__ a"'cGaaaao
HORIZONTAL GEOMETRY VERTICAL GEOMETRY
Distance behind top-of-roadways Height above pad for ground
barrier: 5' to 10' level receivers: 5'
Distance behind individual Height above pad for second
patio and balcony barriers; level receivers; 14'
1' to 3'
S O U R C E A S S U M PT JO N=S___
For roadways with grades no
greater than 2%, all vehicles
were located at the single lane
equivalent acoustic center of
the full roadway. For roadways
with over 2% grade, vehicle
count was divided in half and
located at the single lane
equivalent acoustic center for
each side of the roadway.
VERTICAL GEOMETRY
Automobiles: 0' above center-
line road grade
Medium Trucks: 2.3' above
centerline road
grade
Heavy TrubkS: 8' above
centerline road
grade
* Single lane equivalent (SLE) location.
The results of the barrier calculations,
contained in Appendix 4, show that an eight foot (8')
sound wall will be needed to reduce noise levels to a
maximum exterior level of 65 CNEL. Balconies are not
required to be attenuated since these are not stacked
units and private open space is available at the first
floor level. Tt.a sound wall is to be placed along the
private rear yards of the units adjacent to warner
Avenue from Sceptre Lane to the first parking area just
east of these units. The barrier location is depicted
on Exhibit 4.
7
HORIZONTAL GEOMETRY*