Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Conformance GPC2008002 - Supporting DocumentsCity of-Huntington Beach Planning Department STUDY SESSION REPORT HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: FROM: BY: DATE: Planning Commission Scott Hess , AICP, Director of Planning Hayden Beckman, Planning Aide May 13, 2008 SUBJECT : GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 08-002 (GOTHARD STREET VACATION) LOCATION: East side of Gothard Street approximately 150 feet west of Main Street PROJECT RE UEST AND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS General Plan Conformance No. 08-002 represents a request, pursuant to Section 65402 of the California Government Code, by the City of Huntington Beach to determine if vacation of a city easement on a portion of property previously condemned for the Gothard Street widening is in conformance with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. On April 20, 1999 the City adopted Resolution of Necessity No. 98-30 as a part of the repositioning and extension of Gothard Street between Garfield Avenue and Main Street. The resolution split an existing private property by allowing the City to acquire approximately 9,900 square feet of property for street widening purposes. Subsequently, on July 30, 1999 the City obtained a permanent easement on the 9,900 square foot portion of land, which classified its use as a right of way contribution to the future widening of Gothard Street. Approximately 8,500 square feet of the acquisition was used for the extension of Gothard Street and the remaining 1,400 square feet remained severed and fronting along the newly formed portion of Gothard. Although designated by the General Plan as right of way, the 1,400 square foot site is no longer needed and has not since been used by the City for right of way purposes. The site is currently unimproved and occasionally used for overflow parking for the adjacent 29-unit apartment complex. On June 12, 2001 the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 00-75/Tentative Parcel Map No. 00-207 for the construction of the 29-unit apartment complex which abuts the subject area along the north and east property lines. At that time, the Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation to the City Council that the remnant parcel be maintained as a landscape area. (See Attachment No. 3) Additionally, on April 23, 2008 the Planning Department received an application for Lot Line Adjustment No. 08-002, which requests that the subject property be consolidated to the surrounding parcel, on which the 29-unit apartment complex is located. After the remnant parcel is consolidated the applicant must install a 15 foot landscape planter along the street frontage as required by the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. SS #A-4 CURRENT LAND USE HISTORY OF SITE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS LOCATION .GENERAL PLAN ZONING LAND USE Subject Property:Right of Way Specific Plan 9 (Holly-Vacant Seacliff S ecific Plan North and East of RM (Residential Medium Specific Plan 9 Apartments Subject Pro ert :Densit South and West of I-F2-d-sp (Industrial -Specific Plan 9 Industrial, Vacant the Subject Max. Floor Area Ratio Property (across 0.50 - Design Overlay - Gothard St.):Specific Plan Overlay) APPLICATION PROCESS AND TIMELINES DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE S : April 23, 2008 (Date of Request) June 1, 2008 (40 days from date of request) The request is tentatively scheduled as a non-public hearing item for the Planning Commission meeting of May 28, 2008. CE A ANALYSIS/REVIEW The General Plan conformance review is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15306, Class 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act, which states that information collection which does not result in major disturbance to an environmental resource is exempt from any environmental review. COMMENTS FROM CITY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES The Public Works Department, acting as applicant for General Plan Conformance No. 2008-002, has reviewed and is processing the easement vacation request through the City Council. PUBLIC MEETINGS COMMENTS AND CONCERNS Not applicable. PLANNING ISSUES The only issue to consider as part of this request is the proposed vacation of the easement and its conformance to the City's General Plan. Vacation of the easement conforms to the following goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan: Land Use Element LU Goal 2: Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public services. PC Study Session Report - 05/13/08 -2- (08SRI I GPC 08 -002 Gothard St. Vacation) Gothard Street currently provides sufficient access to the surrounding industrial and residential uses. As a result of the past widening and realignment, the subject property is no longer necessary to support the circulation pattern of the adjacent areas. LU Goal 4: Achieve and maintain high quality architecture, landscape, and public open spaces in the City. The vacation of the easement would result in a transfer of land to the property owner and allow for private enhancement purposes, including improvements to the unimproved site that will advance the visual character of the Gothard Street corridor. LU Polic 9.1.3: Require that multi family residential projects be designed to convey a high level of quality and distinctive neighborhood character as discussed below. (e) Include an adequate landscape setback along the street frontage that is integrated with abutting sidewalks and provides continuity throughout the neighborhood. In a memo to the Mayor and City Council dated June 20, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended that the subject site, a remnant parcel, be maintained as landscaped area. The subject property fronts Gothard Street and as an unimproved site does not contribute to integration or continuity of aesthetic character throughout the adjacent areas. Vacation of the easement will allow the remnant parcel to be incorporated into the adjacent development and used to provide the required 15 foot landscaping buffer along the Gothard street frontage, as set forth by the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, and possibly additional guest parking. Circulation Element CE Ob'ective 1: Balance the circulation system with the circulation demands generated by the implementation of the City's Land Use Element. CE Goal 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing , approved, and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections. The subject easement is no longer needed and its vacation will not have a detrimental impact on the circulation system. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map - General Plan Conformance No. 08-002 2. Project Narrative Dated May 5, 2008 3. Planning Commission Memorandum Dated June 20, 2001 PC Study Session Report - 05/13/08 -3- (08SR11 GPC 08-002 Gothard St. Vacation) PROJECT SITE 0 VICINITY MAP GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 08-002 (GOTHARD STREET VACATION) THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ATTACHMENT NO. I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION TO:Hayden Beckman, Planning Aide FROM: James Wagner, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: General Plan Conformance 2008-02 for the vacation of a portion of condemned property for Gothard Street widening not required for street purposes DATE: May 5, 2008 This is a request to process a GPC for vacating a permanent city easement left over on a portion of APN 111-150-24 that was intersected by new Gothard Street about five years ago. The triangular shaped street easement left over from a condemnation for the new Gothard Street was a piece of property belonging to 7251 Stewart Circle. The location is APN 111-150-24 at the North East corner of old Crystal Street and Clay Avenue also described as Lot 21 in Block "B" of Garfield Street Addition to Huntington Beach. The request would vacate a 1410 sq ft easement on property owned by Joe Gergen that is not required by the city for street widening purposes and would complete the Lot Line Adjustment submitted by Joe Gergen and Bart Deboe to adjust the lots to take 1410 sq ft from the Gergen property severed by the new Gothard Street alignment and have it added to the Bart Deboe property on Gothard Street. Attached, for your use, is an illustration showing the street easement area to be vacated as a crosshatched area. There has been no environmental status action taken to date. cc: Terri Elliott, Principal Civil Engineer C:\Documents and Settings\beckmanh\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK4B6\Memo to Hayden Beckman 5-2-08.doc f TACfHM4 &-,! T NO. N.E. COR., NW 1/4 NW 1/4, SEC. 2,- T. 6 S., R.11 W., S.B.B.M.10.00' SaABFJEL..D VENV _ LEOENO= INDICATES AREA DESCRIBED HEREIN 100W'LN it / I / 'J •o 1 I 211 ,,w 1``' x;60 I / J J _ ___ _ CLAY AVENLi P.O.B. / 6Q• 60, / iE SCALE: 1"=100' Ski EXH/B/T 'B ATTACHMENT NO._ - .1 Iti • Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM : Connie Mandic, Chairperson l.° Huntington Beach Planning Commission DATE: June 20, 2001 SUBJECT: Remnant Parcel at Main and Gothard ISSUE: CALIFORNIA 92648 On June 12, 2001 the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Conditional Use Permit No. 00-75 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 00-207 for the construction of 29 apartment units at Main and Gothard. At the Planning Commission meeting the issue of a remnant parcel adjacent to the proposed project and Gothard Street was discussed with staff. The Planning Commission requested that the City Council be apprised of their recommendation regarding the parcel. BACKGROUND: The remnant parcel totals approximately 1,400 square feet. The City acquired an easement on the parcel for street purposes (Gothard) in 1999, but the property owner, Mel Elliott, retained fee interest after the acquisition. The parcel is bordered on two sides by the approved 29-unit apartment project. The Planning Commission discussed integrating the remnant parcel into the project. The project applicant, PLC, explained that it was unsuccessful in negotiating a purchase price for the parcel with the current owner, Mel Elliott. In addition, the City's easement does not permit the property to be used for private purposes. Thus, the property remains under the control of the City and Mr. Elliott. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends that the remnant parcel be maintained as landscaped area. c: Planning Commission Ray Silver, City Administrator Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning Matt Lamb, Real Estate- Manager Jennifer McGrath, Deputy City Attorney Sandra Thornton, Assistant Planner G:\AdmLtr\Adm ltrO 1\060 1 St 1.doc ATTACHMENT NO. • AGENDA HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION•TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2008 HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 • HUNTINGTON BEACH CHAIR TOM LIVENGOOD VICE-CHAIR ELIZABETH SHIER-BURNETT COMMISSIONER JOE SHAW COMMISSIONER BLAIR FARLEY COMMISSIONER FRED SPEAKER COMMISSIONER DEVIN DWYER COMMISSIONER JOHN SCANDURA DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, SCOTT HESS, AICP LEGAL COUNSEL, LEONIE MULVIHILL PRINCIPAL PLANNER, HERB FAULAND THE 7:00 PM PORTION OF THE MEETING IS TELEVISED LIVE ON CABLE TV CHANNEL 3. VIDEO TAPES OF MEETINGS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC CHECKOUT AT THE CENTRAL LIBRARY. COPIES OF STAFF REPORTS AND/OR WRITTEN MATERIALS ON EACH AGENDA ITEM ARE ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT , THE CENTRAL LIBRARY AND ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE (WWW.SURFCITY -HB.ORG) FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. ANY PERSON HAVING QUESTIONS ON ANY • AGENDA ITEM MAY CALL THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO MAKE AN INQUIRY CONCERNING THE NATURE OF THE AGENDA ITEM AT (714) 536-5271. • 9 Plannin Commission A enda Information Sheet The following is a brief explanation of the Planning Commission Agenda Structure: AGENDA APPROVAL The Planning Commission will announce if any closed public hearing items will be re-opened and may wish to change the order of the items on the agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATION (FILL OUT REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM) Anyone wishing to address the Planning Commission, only on items not on tonight's agenda, must fill out and mark the appropriate box and submit a form to speak prior to Oral Communication. Please be advised that testimon rovided on Public Hearin items durin Oral Communications are not art of the ermanent entitlement record. The speaking forms are available at the lower entrance to the Council Chambers. Give the form to the Secretary. Staff will call all speakers by name. There is a four-minute time limit per speaker. Time may not be donated to another. All proceedings are recorded. No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on these communications on this date, unless agendized. • PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS (FILL OUT REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM) Public hearings allow citizens the opportunity to speak in favor or against specific items. More detailed information on public hearings may be found on the page attached to the back of this agenda. Complete the form by marking the appropriate box and indicating the hearing item you wish to provide testimony on. Please note if the ublic hearin items have been closed or are still o en for testimon . The a ends and staff re ort will indicate if the ublic hearin is o en or closed. The Plannin Commission at their discretion ma re-o en a closed ublic hearin and the Commission will make the announcement durin A enda A royal. The speaking forms are available at the • lower entrance to the Council Chambers. Give the form to the Secretary. Staff will call all speakers by name. There is a four-minute time limit per speaker. Individuals may choose to donate their 4 minutes of time to another speaker, and the maximum time donation limit is 8 minutes (2 individuals), for a total of 12 minutes per speaker. Individuals who donate time must be present when the item is being discussed. All proceedings are recorded. If you have documents to distribute, there should be enough copies for all Planning Commissioners, staff, and the public. The documents become part of the public record and will not be returned. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are considered routine items that normally do not require separate consideration. The Planning Commission may make one motion for approval of all items listed under the CONSENT CALENDAR. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS These items are considered by the Planning Commission separately and require separate motions. These transactions are considered administerial and public testimony is not heard. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS I INQUIRIES Items of business or concern are presented by Planning Commissioners and discussed with staff. Informational updates and reports are made by Commissioners who serve as liaisons to various committees. PLANNING ITEMS Updates and reports from the Planning Director for the information of the Planning Commission and the public. Ad'ournment • 08ag0527 2 AGENDA HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2008 HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER 2000 MAIN STREET , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 • 5:15 P.M. - ROOM B-8 (CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL) CALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Farley, Dwyer, Shier-Burnett, Livengood, Shaw, Speaker, Scandura AGENDA APPROVAL A. PROJECT REVIEW FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS) A-1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-33/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 07-06 (MONTESSORI SCHOOL) - Andrew Gonzales, Assistant Planner A-2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 08-06 (APPEAL - HB MOTORCARS ELECTRONIC READERBOARD POLE SIGN) - Andrew Gonzales, Assistant Planner B. STUDY SESSION ITEMS - NONE C. AGENDA REVIEW UPDATE ON ALL AGENDA ITEMS - Herb Fauland D. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMITTEE REPORTS D-1. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY COMMITTEE UPDATE - Commissioners Shaw and Dwyer E. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Regarding Project Review and Study Session portions of Meeting Anyone wishing to speak on Project Review or Study Session items during PUBLIC COMMENTS may do so by filling out a Request To Speak form and giving it to the Secretary. (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS F. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 6:30 P.M. - RECESS FOR DINNER • 08ag0527 3 7:00 P.M. -- COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Farley, Dwyer, Shier-Burnett, Livengood, Shaw, Speaker, Scandura AGENDA APPROVAL A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Anyone wishing to speak during ORAL COMMUNICATIONS must fill out and submit a form to speak. The Planning Commission can take no action on this date, unless the item is agendized. Any one wishing to speak on items not on tonight's agenda, a closed public hearing item, or on non-public hearing items may do so during ORAL COMMUNICATIONS.- Please note comments on closed public hearing items will not be part of the permanent entitlement record. Speakers on items scheduled for PUBLIC HEARING will be invited to speak during the public hearing. (4 MINUTES PER PERSON,-NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Anyone wishing to speak during an open PUBLIC HEARING must fill out and submit a form to speak. The public may address the Planning Commission only during the open PUBLIC HEARING items or during ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. Please review the agenda to determine whether the PUBLIC HEARING item is open or closed. If the PUBLIC HEARING on an item is closed, you will not be permitted to speak during that portion of the agenda and may wish to address your concerns during the ORAL COMMUNICATIONS portion of the agenda. Speakers on items scheduled for PUBLIC HEARING will be invited to speak during the public hearing. (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, WITH A MAXIMUM TIME DONATION OF 8 MINUTES, FOR A TOTAL OF 12 MINUTES PER SPEAKER PROCEDURE: Commission Disclosure Statement(s), Staff Report Presentation, Commission Questions, Public Hearing, Discussion/Action. B-1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 07-002/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 08-002 (2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request : GPA: To update the General Plan Housing Element for the 2008-2014 planning period pursuant to California Government Code Section 65588; ND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Housing Element Update. Location: Citywide Protect Planner: Jennifer Villasenor STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: A. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 08-002 with findings." B. "Approve General Plan Amendment No. 07-002 and forward Resolution No. 1621 to the City Council for adoption." • • is 08ag0527 4 • B-2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-44/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 07-18 (APPEAL - HERMAN RESIDENCE) Applicant: Greg Howell Appellant : Commissioner John Scandura Request: CDP: To permit the demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of an approximately 6,208 sq. ft., 35 ft. tall single -family dwelling with a 602 sq. ft. attached garage ; CUP: To permit a single-family dwelling with (a) an approximately 1,107 sq. ft. 3 floor habitable area, (b) an approximately 148 sq. ft. third story deck, and (c) an overall building height exceeding 30 ft. The request includes a review and analysis for compliance with the Infill Lot Ordinance. The Infill Lot Ordinance encourages adjacent property owners to review proposed development for compatibility/ privacy issues, such as window alignments, building pad height, and floor plan layout. Location: 3292 Falkland Circle, 92649 (terminus of Falkland Circle, east of Channel Lane) Pro'ect Planner: Andrew Gonzales STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Continue Coastal Development Permit No. 07-018/ Conditional Use Permit No. 07-044 to the June 24, 2008 Planning Commission meeting." • C. CONSENT CALENDAR - NONE D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS D-1. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 08-02 (GOTHARD STREET VACATION) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: To determine if vacation of a City easement on a portion of property previously condemned for the Gothard Street widening is in conformance with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. Location: East side of Gothard Street approximately 150 feet west of Main Street Pro'ect Planner: Hayden Beckman STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Adopt Resolution No. 1622 approving General Plan Conformance No. 08-002 with findings." E. PLANNING ITEMS E-1. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING E-2. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING E-3. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING F. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS F-1. PLANNING COMMISSION REQUEST ITEMS - NONE • F-2. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Farley - Commissioner Dwyer - Vice Chairperson Shier-Burnett - Chairperson Livengood - Commissioner Shaw - Commissioner Speaker - Commissioner Scandura - 08ag0527 5 ADJOURNMENT: Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, June 10, 2008. Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision, Ordinance,--the action taken by the Planning Commission is final unless,an appeal is-filed to the City Clerk by you or,by,an interested party. Said appeal, must be in writing: and ` must"set forth-in detail theaction'and grounds,by which the applicant or interested - party deems himself aggrieved. Said, appeal must,, be , accompanied, by , a filing fee of One Thousand Five Hundred Forty-One-Dollars '($1,541.00) if the appeal is filed by -a:single family dwelling property owner appealing the decision on ,his own property or-Two Thousand Three Hundred Seventy- Nine Dollars ($2,379.00) if the appeal is filed by any other party. The appeal shall be"submitted to the City Clerk within ten 10' calendar da s of the date of the Plannin Commission's action. Copies of staff reports and/or written materials on *,each agenda item, are _on ,file. in the Planning Department, for inspection by the public: A copy'of the agenda packet is also 'available at the Central Library (7111 Talbert Avenue). DVD'S OF MEETINGS ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC CHECK OUT AT THE CENTRAL LIBRARY, AND FOR DUPLICATION SERVICES IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. • • • 08ag0527 6 I • • • ublic Hearing Procedures • F BEACH PLANNING:COMMISSION This statement has been prepared to provide a better understanding of the procedures for public hearings before the Planning Commission. Regular meetings of the Planning Commission are held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month beginning at 5:15 p.m. in Room B-8 for a study session and then at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. Adjourned meetings, special meetings, and Study Sessions may be scheduled at other times. Planning Commission proceedings are governed by the Planning Commission By-Laws, Robert's Rules of Order and the Brown Act. The following is the typical sequence of events on public hearing items: A. The Chairperson shall announce the item and if the public hearing is open or closed. B. The Planning Commission shall disclose any discussions, conversations, etc., with applicants, applicants representatives or property owners. C. The staff report is presented. D. Questions by the Planning Commission concerning the staff report may be answered at this time. E. The public hearing is opened by the Chairperson. F. The applicant or appellant is given an opportunity to address the Commission. Time is not limited but left to the Chairperson's discretion. G. Public Comments: Staff will call all speakers by name. Please proceed to the podium. Individuals favoring and opposing the proposal are given an opportunity to address the Commission (up to four (4) minutes), or may choose to donate their time to another speaker if the "Request to Speak" form is filled out and given to the Secretary. A speaker who addresses the Commission on behalf of individuals who donate time are allowed a maximum of 12 minutes. Individuals who donate time must be present when the item is being discussed. Please state your name before addressing the Commission. H. The Commission may ask questions of speakers addressing the Commission. 1. The public hearing is closed. J. The Commission will deliberate the matter at this time. K. The Commission then acts on the matter by continuing, approving, conditionally approving, or denying the petition. The Planning Commission receives a staff report packet on the Tuesday preceding the meeting, allowing time to review each case and make further investigations in the field prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff reports are available in the Planning Department, the Central Library and on the City's website (www.surfcity-hb.org) anytime on Wednesday preceding the Tuesday Planning Commission meeting. 08ag0527 7 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION TO:Hayden Beckman, Planning Aide . FROM: James Wagner, Senior Civil Engineer 4 P'W SUBJECT: General Plan Conformance 2008-02 for the vacation of a portion of condemned property for Gothard Street widening not required for street purposes DATE: May 5, 2008 This is a request to process a GPC for vacating a permanent city easement left over on a portion of APN 111-150-24 that was intersected by new Gothard Street about five years ago. The triangular shaped street easement left over from a condemnation for the new Gothard Street was a piece of property belonging to 7251 Stewart Circle. The location is APN 111-150-24 at the North East corner of old Crystal Street and Clay Avenue also described as Lot 21 in Block "B" of Garfield Street Addition to Huntington Beach. The request would vacate a 1410 sq ft easement on property owned by Joe Gergen that is not required by the city for street widening purposes and would complete the Lot Line Adjustment submitted by Joe Gergen and Bart Deboe to adjust the lots to take 1410 sq ft from the Gergen property severed by the new Gothard Street alignment and have it added to the Bart Deboe property on Gothard Street. Attached, for your use, is an illustration showing the street easement area to be vacated as a crosshatched area. There has been no environmental status action taken to date. cc: Terri Elliott, Principal Civil Engineer i 1AY 0 6 11--OLIG G:\Engineering Division\WAGNER\Memo's\Development ProjectsWlemo to Hayden Beckman 5-2-08.doc N.E. COR., NW 1/4 NW 1/4, SEC. 2,- T. 6 S., R.11 W., S.B.B.M. II I Sa4R FIEL.ID VENUE LEGEND: 10.00' INDICATES AREA DESCRIBED HEREIN bQ / II 111 \ o.\I `sue ,o---H o I I ,°I I \ I I I 01 0r) J (cot dv a•. AY AVENUE _ N 18'59'43' E 50.95' iE SCALE: 1 "=100' EXHIBIT 'B' / / 60, / / 60, / N71' 00"W 80.47, Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Connie Mandic, Chairperson L-1 Huntington Beach Planning Commission DATE: June 20, 2001 SUBJECT: Remnant Parcel at Main and Gothard ISSUE: On June 12, 2001 the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Conditional Use Permit No. 00-75 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 00-207 for the construction of 29 apartment units at Main and Gothard. At the Planning Commission meeting the issue of a remnant parcel adjacent to the proposed project and Gothard Street was discussed with staff. The Planning Commission requested that the City Council be apprised of their recommendation regarding the parcel. BACKGROUND: The remnant parcel totals approximately 1,400 square feet. The City acquired an easement on the parcel for street purposes (Gothard) in 1999, but the property owner, Mel Elliott, retained fee interest after the acquisition. The parcel is bordered on two sides by the approved 29-unit apartment project. The Planning Commission discussed integrating the remnant parcel into the project. The project applicant, PLC, explained that it was unsuccessful in negotiating a purchase price for the parcel with the current owner, Mel Elliott. In addition, the City's easement does not permit the property to be used for private purposes. Thus, the property remains under the control of the City and Mr. Elliott. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning Commission recommends that the remnant parcel be maintained as landscaped area. c: Planning Commission Ray Silver, City Administrator Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning Matt Lamb, Real Estate Manager Jennifer McGrath, Deputy City Attorney Sandra Thornton, Assistant Planner G:\AdmLtr\Adm 1tr01 \0601 st 1.doc • ® Huntington each Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 9254 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Connie Mandic, Chairperson Huntington Beach Planning Commission DATE: November 8, 2001 SUBJECT: SIENA APARTMENTS (29 UNITS AT MAIN AND GOTHARD) On June 12, 2001 the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 00- 75/Tentative Parcel Map No. 00-207 for the construction of 29 apartments (27 of which are affordable) at the northwest corner of Main St. and Gothard Ave. During the Planning Commission meeting the issue of an approximately 1,400 sq. ft. remnant parcel was discussed. The triangular shaped parcel is located along the Gothard Ave. frontage and interrupts the proposed improvements along the project site (see attached). The City acquired an easement over the parcel for street purposes in 1999, but the property owner Mel Elliott, retained fee interest. The Planning Commission discussed integrating the remnant parcel into the project. The project applicant, PLC, explained their attempts at integrating the parcel into their plan. PLC noted that it had been unsuccessful with the owner in negotiating a purchase price for the parcel. Also, the City's easement prohibits the use of the property for private purposes. Thus, the remnant parcel remains unimproved and under the control of the City and Mr. Elliott. The Planning Commission expressed their concerns over the unimproved state of the property and the irregular configuration of the project frontage. The Planning Commission requested staff forward to the City Council a recommendation to have the property landscaped while PLC, the owner and the City resolve the issues. Attachment: Site Plan C: Planning Commission Ray Silver, City Administrator Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planning Herb Fauland, Senior Planner Mike Hennessey, Contract Real Estate Manager Jennifer McGrath, Deputy City Attorney C:\Documents and Settings\lugarr\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1es\OLK3\0601st1.doc 04/13/2001 10:50 PLC LAND COMPANY 4 917143741540 FAX TRANSMITTAL NO.293 1701 Date: ( From: Bill Holman To: Telephone Number: (949) 729-1 17 Company:g ! Fox Number: (949) 729-1214 Fax Number: 14' 1 Number of pages:7 (tndgd g this pege) Subject:1 .L.4 . cJ1l (-uric (WWA di 4Flf [H6 ! 19 Cofpari ARI Idn 14 m em te:u 0wwt1 IhINxdei1000 tq,ne,t211t 1 04/13/2001 10:50 PLC LAND COMPANY 4 917143741540 •• DATE: April 12, 2001 NO.293 002 SUBJECT: Proposed Exchange of Fee Interest in Real Property betwc . n City of Huntington Beach and Willis M. (Mel) Elliott; APN's Ill-1 i0-24 and 111-150-25 Background Mel Elliott Is the owner of a 7,373 square foot parcel located at the northeas comer of old Crystal Street and Clay Avenue (APN 111-150-24). Mr. Elliott also owns and operates an oil well (Columbia 1) and associated storage tanks on this prop . This parcel is one of two remnants of an original 17,310 square foot parcel o d by Mr. Elliott since 1972. A sketch of the parcel is attached as Exhibit "A." As part of the planned realignment and extension of Gothard Street betwe Garfield Avenue and Main Street adopted as part of the Holly Seacliff General Plan. rte City on April 20, 1998 adopted a Resolution of Necessity (Res. No. 98-30) to acq re 9,937 square feet of the 17,310 square foot parcel for the construction of Gothard Street in its new alignment. The 9,937 square foot "take" consisted of 8,541 square feet of street right of way, plus a 1.396 square foot remnant parcel ("Elliott Remnant;') located northeast of the street and therefore severed from the balance of Mr. Elliott's retained parcel.1 The City and Mr. Elliott negotiated for over a year concerning the value (if th property to be taken. A settlement was reached in April 1999, wherein the City agreed to pay Mr. Elliott $220,000.00 for acquisition of the 9,937 square feet, including all interest and severance damages to the remaining property. All acquisition and legal costs tgcurred by the City were paid by PLC in accordance with Development Agreement No. X0-1. The settlement was approved by the City Council on April 19, 1999, however, the Fnal Order of Condemnation entered in Superior Court on July 30, 1999 indicates tha" the City acquired only a permanent easement to the subject property, not the fee ' serest as represented in the settlement negotiations. PLC requested the City to fi1t amended order of condemnation to obtain the fee interest in the remnant, but the Ci did not pursue. PLC owns property adjacent to the north and east of the Elliott Remnant, ich is the subject of a development application (Tentative Parcel Map No, 00-207 and C nditiona! Use Permit No. 00-75). PLC proposes to merge seven existing parcels and co struct 29 apartments, 27 of which will be restricted to occupancy by low income hou eholds to meet the City's affordable housing requirements for two approved resident; projects. Applications for the PLC project were submitted on December 8, 2000. A c qpy of the PLC site plan is attached as Exhibit "B." PLC's site plan proposes improvements upon the Elliott Remnant, including a portion of the secondary access driveway, two parking spaces, landscaping ant' a portion cf a fence. The Elliott Remnant was included in the site plan in lieu of leaving an unimproved, 1 104/13 /G10101 110:710 -L'. LHNV l.UI1 HNY y `_'11 ?14.5'(4174k`NO. 233 00= unmaintained parcel, and due to the fact that the City holds a permanent eas meat over the remnant. The City has responded that the Elliott Remnant should not be ncluded in the site plan for the PLC project unless Mr. Elliott consents to the inclusion, r conveys the fee interest is the property to PLC. PLC met With Mr. Elliott on April 12, 2001 to inquire if he would consent t including the remnant within the PLC project or quitclaim his fee interest ,n the prope to either the City or ?LC, which he declined. He did, however, express interest in exe anging his fee interest in tie remnant for the City's fee interest in a City-owned remnant parcel ("City Remnant") which lies east of and adjacent to his retained property. The City acquired the adjacent parcel (111-150-25) from the estate of Barbara Bomf as pan of the Gothard condemnation in February 2000. As with the Elliott property acq isition, all City acquisition and legal costs for the Bomann property were paid by PI.C.. Pro sad Exchan e Under the proposed exchange, the City would exchange its fee interest in an approximately 2,120 square foot City remnant for Mr, Elliott's fee interest in; the 1,396 square foot Elliott remnant, which is already encumbered by a permanent easecnt. The City Remnant Will remain after construction of a cul-de-sac at teruz inus of Cl y Avenue by Pacific Golf Properties as part of the approved Fountains senior apartm nt project. A sketch of the Elliott retained parcel, City Remnant and Clay Avenue impro ements is attached as Exhibit "C" The exchange would allow both remnant parcels to be incorporated into the adjl cent uses rather than remain in an unimproved state and an ongoing maintenance bur an to the City. Conveyance of the fee interests in the exchanged remnants to Elliott and PLC would also return these properties to the tax rolls. Time is of the essence. PLC's project has already been delayed two months pending staff and City Attorney analysis of the Elliott Remnant. If the proposed exchange is not approved in concept by May 7, PLC has no choice but to amend its site plan oo exclude tae Elliott Remnant so as not to further delay the public hearing on 'the TPM land CUP. Certificates of occupancy on PLC's approved projects are tied ro su,stantial piogress on approval and construction of the affordable units.I 2 VJ4/ 1.)/ _kJ' 11 110: 710 P'LL LHNI) LLWh'HNY '> '1'(14S(41540 e uired A vals and Schedule The following instruments and approvals are required: Task Staff review of exchange proposal and approval in concept (or disapproval) City Council review and approval in concept (or disapproval) Prepare Legal Descriptions Obtain Preliminary Title Information Prepare Exchange Agreement and Deeds Planning Commission finding of General Plan Conformance for disposition of remnants to Elliott & PLC Responsible • Dark Administration by hpnl20 City Attorney Public Works Planning Real Estate Services Administration by y7 Walden & Associates by 4pril 20 Real Estate Services by 4Aril 27 City Attorney by ay 14 Planning Mays 22 NO. 293 0e4 I Close of Escrow Real Estate Services May,. 31 3 04/13/2001 10:50 PLC LAND COMPANY 4 917143741540 NO.293 1705 HE. OR ,11 r"IBI HW114 gfCc 2, r. 6 5., 10.00, F. An T "AR. 11 W., 5.691' .GAR FIELD A VENUE 30' 0' 1 27 I 18 19 4 LOT 20 C; C'. 5 1/& "LOT 20 21 4J 23 . PWA Na"y114•Iil?•?ak 22 111-1 Z p CLAT AVENUE ALDEN & SSOCIATES 24 2G H 100730" ' 8 .47' N18-5'43'E 50.95' IND,GAT .6 ARIA 05Gk11ED tN 7 EXtt1131i' 'k SK1:TCfl TO AGGOffANY A LZGA:. Of 1,PTION FOR ROAD AGW51TiON AP. NO. 121-150-24 18D1$ COWAN, SUITS 210, IRVINE, CA 02714 W.Q. No - te,..(714) 600-0140 TAXI 440-0415 En r, Arr:_Chk.Q.}+ heet2_ Of_2 r1U.%'3 LI' Jcd1 1J GVVl -LL. LHI VLF :.UI 'Ifl-IIV 1 1 (14.] (4174'Ufill l tt Ise ii QdPa8 a6 pe QF daa f ' AEI;;w ii Ia !6 ftyap: d z. ,lot,I I i I vapg ifQG oQ9i!gel. ! e 6 eo 6mjj ti x i ' L 1Lwkmt-ff!Tm FLAN roe, I f rw fPAW5 AT M11' rw txx-w Ida It N 1 4 46 or 3 1 lic 00Th/WV STREET A 6 , : 11 tr'l:!rl ;r 7b• 11 f1f! r 1 f, I If 14 1 21. MA OAd c roi -r Z3+19, $ ff. tiara 5r 77D4 CORM 5T. L d .N 4riu t--- . , - f ._.-. • C E RESOLUTION NO. 4501 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING EXISTING POLICIES, OBJECTIVES, CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR EN- VIRONMENTAL EVALUATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROJECTS MT:ahb Pursuant to Section 9720 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby adopts the following provisions as amended to supplement and implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS. An environmental application shall be filed in a form prescribed by the Department of Environmental Resources for all projects unless the project is exempt under the provisions of CEQA or exempt under the regu- lations of the City of Huntington Beach. All other applications required by the City of Huntington Beach for the project shall be filed concurrently with the environmental application. SECTION 2. FEES. Upon filing the environmental applica- tion, the applicant shall pay an administrative processing fee of seventy-five dollars ($75). If the environmental evaluation of the project is determined by the Department of Environmental Resources or the Environmental Review Committee to require an environmental impact report, the applicant must post a deposit in the amount of the estimated cost of the EIR prior to the city's undertaking preparation of such EIR. If the actual cost of the environmental impact report is less than the estimate, a refund of the difference between the actual cost and the es- timated cost shall be made to the applicant. If the actual cost exceeds the estimated cost, the applicant shall reimburse the city for the difference. Where an EIR is required, in addition to the i I. I i i actual cost of preparation of the EIR, the applicant is re- quired to pay an administrative processing fee based on the project value as follows: Project Value Administrative Fee 0 - $ 1,0001000 $ 1,000,000 - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 - $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 - $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 - $10,000,000 of project value over $7,500,000 $10,000,000 and over $690 plus $2 for each $100,000 of project value over $10,000,000 up to $1,500, after which the fee shall be set by the Environmental Review Committee SECTION 3. EXPIRATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL. Environ- mental documents approval by the discretionary body shall run concurrently with the approval of the project, unless there are substantial changes proposed which will require major revisions in the environmental documents, in which case new environmental documents shall be submitted at the time of reapproval of such project. SECTION 4. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES. The procedure for environmental evaluation by the Environmental Review Committee is depicted in the flow diagram attached as Addendum No. 1 and incorporated herein by reference. The criteria to be used by the Environmental Review Committee for evaluation of potential environmental effects shall be in accordance with CEQA and the guidelines promulgated by the State Office of Planning and Research. The following documents shall be filed at the time of the application for environmental evaluation: $400 $400 plus $4 for each $100,000 of project value over $1,000,000 $460 plus $3.50 for each $100,000 of project value over $2,500,000 $550 plus $3 for each $100,000 of project value over $5,000,000 $625 plus $2.50 for each $100,000 2. I I (a) Four (4) copies of the environmental application shall be filed with the Environmental Review Committee; (b) Four (4) copies each of the following data must accom- pany the environmental application: (1) Plot plan drawn to scale, (2) Location and elevation of structures, both ex- isting and proposed, (3) Location and size of existing trees and shrubs, (4) Parking plan and access from adjacent streets, (5) Landscaping, fencing and wall proposed, if any, (6) Topography and any unique features of the land, (7) Photographs of the project area sufficient to de- pict pictorially existing physical conditions of the pro- posed project area. SECTION 5.DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ENVIRON- MENTAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES. The procedure for environmental evaluation by the Department of Environmental Resources is de- picted in the flow diagram attached hereto as Addendum No. 2 and is incorporated herein by reference. The criteria to be used by the Department of Environmental Resources for evaluation of po- tential environmental effects shall be as provided in CEQA and the guidelines promulgated by the State Office of Planning and Research. The documentation filed with the Department of Environmental Resources shall be identical with that required under Section 4 hereinabove, except that only two (2) copies of each document are required. SECTION 6. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS. Pursuant to the imple- mentation guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act each public agency shall list in its procedures those specific activities which fall within each of the exempt classes estab- lished in the Act. To that end the following list of categorical exemptions is hereby established: A. C.E.Q.A. Exem tions. All categorical exemptions established In S. 15100 et seq. of the Guidelines for Implementation of the 3. • 1 1 D the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as there- after amended are hereby incorporated by reference. B. Other Exem tions. The following list of additional exemp- tions recognized by the city are further declared to be con- sistent with both the letter and intent of the California Environmental Quality Act. 1. Class I: Existin Facilities. The operation, repair, maintenance or minor alterations of (a) Existing highways and streets (within already es- tablished ri hts-of-wa railroads and navigable waterwa s• bridle trails service roads fire lanes and olf cart paths. (b) Outdoor lightin for security and o erations. (c) Interior or internal modifications to established areas which are fully developed within lar er environ- ment of parks or recreation centers where such in- terior or internal modification is essential) a rearran ement rather than additive function. (d) Renewal of any lease license or ermit to use ex- istin structure or facilit for the use involved ne li ible or no permanent effects on'the environment rovided that such renewal does not involve a dis- cretionary a royal and is not in conflict with the Huntin ton Beach Munici al and Ordinance Codes. 2. Class IV: Minor Alterations to Land. Minor alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of trees except for agricultural purposes including: (a) New gardening, tree lantin , or landscaping but not includin tree removal except trees or limbs deter- mined to be dead damaged or diseased by the Director of Public Works. (b) The renewal of any lease license or ermit to use land where the use involves ne li ible or no permanent 4. • 1 1 effects on the environment. 3. Class V: Alterations in Land Use Limitations. Minor alterations including: (a) Minor street alley and utility easement vacations (b) Consolidation of lots and /or arcels 44. Class VI : Information Collection . Class VI consists of basic data collection , research , experimental management and resource evaluation activities which will cause no than es or only minor physical than es on the site where the information is bein collected . These may be for strictly information gathering purposes , or as part of the study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted , or funded . This includes but is not limited to: (a) Permits for test holes in ublic areas which will be used for en ineerin evaluation for streets sewers storm drains , buildin or utility installation. (b) Basic data collection field testin research ex- perimental management and resource activities of city de artments which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. (c) Accumulation of basic research data an rivate pro - erty for re aration of an EIR. 5. Class IX: Ins ections. Class IX consists of activities limited entirely to inspection, to check for performance of an operation or quality , health or safety of a project including related activities such as inspection for pos- sible mislabeling, misrepresentation , or adulteration of products . This includes but is not limited to activities of cit departments bureaus divisions sections offices, or officers limited entirely to ins ection to check the performance of an operation or the ualit health or safety of a pro ect. 6. Class XI : Accessory Structures . Class XI consists of 5. 1 LI construction or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, institu- tional, and lanned develo ment facilit . These include, but are not limited to: (a) Small parking lots, five s aces or less. (b) Game courts play equi ment drinkin fountains restrooms. (c) Placement of seasonal or tem orary use items such as lifeguard towers mobile food units and "similar 'items and enerally the same locations from time to time u on publicly-owned ro erty. 7. Class XX: Chan es in Organization of Local A encies. Ado Lion of ordinances (except zonin ) which establish or amend procedures for reviewin an activity or which require subse uent discretionar action which is subject to C.E.Q.A. Also minor amendments to zonin ordinances that do not chan e the development standards intensit or density of such distri'cts are exem t under this cate or . SECTION 7. Resolution No, 4397 and all other resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of August, 1977. ATTEST: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk By tltl Deputy City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attor ey MT REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APP VED: i Administrator irecto f Planning 6. Environmental Document Processing, Environmental Review Committee i '?lathe { • Feaibify StW7 •AdmY:tratlw a Mdwtareaee Am.i.y 0 'Aopok to Vote d pepk 'Eaeaept by State Lw 'Ebeclmeat d the Sate LeeAst tae Acd*y Peojdd W the Study Undertaken ERC R..kw. InetkiStady to Determbn Sl(oifinot Ea t.oo•mental Fltect Pet of a Foeme EM O.X-i.g Emettendy Aiuitekt fateBoriaiy Eoapl Notice of hoed Envkomenta Rework ERC Camde FlK To Be Pmpued 14000 of CompM. Fidel with Ib-."a Ar-,q ERC Detembe Adcgoaoy foe Pbdiq EIR Pabiabua be loaf aew.papea poled for 30 days he dry dark, ofno P"&." impoodble Apo"R"kw !yJERGERC end Find FIR to be Ffepdeed t Fbnl ED[ to Mod'dy dodo. Obceetiooey Body Appeww FIR M.ddy ed/a Ap¢ow Nep so. Dedw tion ERG Prep.Neptia. Deddatba Pabic Il.arbo to be iddd by D:ereeteaey Ndpdee Darla ttea Ngado. pabiadoa is teal Dedeettea with Peddle oewpaper and poled for end Pdma Commeaa 10 day. he City Cbka Forwarded to Dio.etteorydfiw Body witb Stitt Repod N%&- Ded- if doe Fonnrdd to DLta.- doae7 Body and Fated with Peredt or EadlIedknt Napo., Dedantbs to fm Appo b Nepeha D.deadloaDlmppowd • i ApplkaM as y Appal th. Rapde.ment A to Pape. an EIL Appal to Dkoetfoavy Body Fob Na.1epJwfdlttion Addendum 1 at Sent to cam" a"by 06M "A"Body I Res. No.4501 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) so: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City 1 Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the ,City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is'seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of August ,19 77 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Wieder Caen Gibbs Siebert Shenkman Pattinson NOES : Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California I By Deputy City Clerk 0 2008 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT SCHEDULE4 WKS 4 Z_ • 1.5 I A B C D E Planning Commissio Legal &Completed Staff Labels to Admin Asst Report w/ attachments to Packet Ready for Meeting Date Report to Report to Herb & Legal to Paper Admin Asst for Print;Delivery Admin Asst PowerPoint to Herb 5:00 PM Tuesday 5:00 PM 5: 00 PM Thursday 12:00 Noon Monday 12:00 Noon Friday 12:00 Noon Wednesda Tuesda j/8/200 8.12/12/2007.12/13/2007 -'12/24/2007',-12/28/2007 1/2/2008*,Wed11,1 1/23/2008 * Wed 12/26/2007 12/27/2007 1/7/2008 11/11/2008 1/15/2008 12/2008 '1116"/2008 1/17/2008 -1/28/2008,'-",,2/l/2008',,,2/5/2008, 2/26/2008 1/30/2008 1/31/2008 2/11/2008 2/15/2008 2/19/2008 "'3/11/2008''2/13/2008 2/14/2008 2/25/2008 2/29/2008 - 3/412008. 3/25/2008 2/27/2008 2/28/2008 3/10/2008 3/14/2008 3/18/2008 :3,418/2008.,3/12/2008',3/13/2008,3/24/2008 ° °.3/28/2008 .4/I/2008 4/22/2008 3/26/2008 3/27/2008 4/7/2008 4/11/2008 4/15/2008 5/13/2008 A /16/2008 4/17/2008 4/28120018'-:-':5/2/2008 5/6/2008 5/28/2008 * Wed 5/1/2008 'STt200..,,,5/16/2008 5/20/2008 6/10/2008 5/14/2008 5/15/2008'-;5/27/2008* 'I'ces`5/30/2008 '6/3/2008' 6/24/2008 5/28/2008 5/29/2008 6/9/2008 6/13/2008 6/17/2008 7/8/2008', :6/11/2008 6/12/2008-6/23/2008 6/27/2008 7/1/2008 7/22/2008 6/25/2008 6/26/2008 7/7/2008 7/11/2008 7/15/2008 :8/12/2008 , ";-7/16/2008 7117/2008 7/28/2008 8/1/2008 8/5/2008 8/26/2008 7/30/2008 7/31/2008 8/11/2008 8/15/2008 8/19/2008 x_.,9/9/2008, `;-„8/X312008 8/1'4/2008 8/2512008.8/29/2008 9/2/2008 9/23/2008 8/27/2008 8/28/2008 9/8/2008 9/12/2008 9/16/2008 10/1'4/2008 9/17/2008,.9/1$/2008 9/29/2008 10/3/2008 10/7/2008 10/28/2008 10/1/2008 10/2/2008 10/13/2008 10/17/2008 10/21/2008 11/12/2008 Wed,`10116/20W 10/17/2008 10/28/2008 11/1/2008 11/5/2008 11/25/2008 10/29/2008 10/30/2008 11/10/2008 11/14/2008 11/18/2008 12/9/2008 ' °. _11/1-2/2008,-'11/13/2008 11/24/2008 12/1/2008* Mon 12/2/2008,S;- 12/23/2008 11/26/2008 12/1/2008* Mon 12/8/2008 12/12/2008 12/16/2008 -4/13/2009 ,12/17/2008 12/18/2008 12/29/2008 1/2/2009 1/6/2009, *Holiday Deadlines /changes G:\Linda\2008 PC Schedule.xls OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY P.O. Box 190 Gail Hutton 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Telephone (714) 536-5555City Attorney Fax (714) 374-1590 April 12, 2001 William D. Holman PLC Land Company 23 Corporate Plaza, Ste. 250 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Bill: Pursuant to the attached final Order of Condemnation filed July 30, 1999, the City of Huntington Beach maintains a permanent easement on the 1,396 square foot triangular remnant located northeast of the new Gothard Street alignment. I have reviewed this issue with both the Public Works and Planning Departments. The permanent easement is defined for the purposes of the construction, installation, operation, maintenance and use of the right-of-way project. The City is therefore unable to meet your request to quitclaim this remnant parcel to PLC. Sincerely, JENNIFER MC GRATH, Deputy City Attorney JMP/k Attachment: Conformed copy of Final Order of Condemnation c: Mike Heineke Mary Beth Broeron S1ra Thornton jmp/icon-es/27 b N F O R M 10b P''Recorded in the Jnty of Orange , California Not Carripared with Original Gary 111111111111Granville.lllllllllkll111 /27C@der 1 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 111111I X9990592245 1:30 08/13/99DAVID B. COSGROVE (SBN 115564; 2 DOUGLAS J. DENNINGTON (SBN 1 005 22056860 22 27 JEFFREY MELCHING (SBN 180351)009 8 6.00 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1998 4 Telephone: (714) 641-5100 Fax: (714) 546-9035 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH -- '-"Un ca[ tr JUL 3 0 1999 ALAN c4rEft. ecutyO1Grer1Clerk 4'4 lcLY14.VgCeq SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR 1 HHE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,CASE NO. 794272 Plaintiff, ) JUDGE TULLY H. SEYMOUR 13 vs. 14 WILLIS MELVIN ELLIOTT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 DEPARTMENT C30 FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION (Code Civ. Proc. §1268.030) Date Action Filed: 5/13/98 Trial Date: None 18 Judgment in Condemnation having been entered in the above-entitled action on 19 `30 ,1999, in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of the County of Orange, 20 State of California, and its appearing to the Court's satisfaction that just compensation shall be 21 paid by disbursement from the State Treasurer in the sum of Two Hundred Twenty Thousand 22 ($220,000.00) including interest to Defendants Willis Melvin Elliott and Lola Dean Elliott. Such 23 sum represents the agreed total just compensation award, including interest. 24 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 25 The interests in the real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, 26 more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and 27 incorporated herein by this reference (the "Subject Property"), are hereby condemned to and taken 28 for the purposes of the construction, installation, operation, maintenance and use of the Project 4- 780/003821 -0018/3263851 .1 aOS/27/99 [PROPOSED) FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION 1 as defined in the Complaint in Eminent. Domain filed in this action (the "Project"). The interests 2 in real property comprising the Subject Property being condemned in this action consist of a 3 permanent easement to Assessor's Parcel Number 111-150-24 described in Exhibit "A" attached 4 hereto, for the purpose widening of Gothard Street. 5 Upon recordation of a CERTIFIED COPY of this Final Order of Condemnation in the 6 Official Records of the County of Orange, State of California, a permanent easement in the 7 Subject Property as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, shall vest in City of Huntington 8 Beach and its successors and assigns. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all taxes and assessments, 10 penalties, and costs which are a lien on the Subject Property and which are apportioned to the 11 City or imposed on the Subject Property for that portion of the fiscal year following the date the 12 Judgment in Condemnation is entered or the apportionment date of October 11, 1998 whichever 13 first occurs, are hereby cancelled and extinguished pursuant to Sections 5081 et seq. of the 14 Revenue and Taxation Code. 15 - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the payment to Willis Melvin 16 Elliott and Lola Dean Elliott of the total sum as set forth above includes full and complete 17 compensation for, and has satisfied any and all obligations of the City regarding, the acquisition 18 of the Subject Property located within the City of Palm Springs and bearing Assessor's Parcel No. 19 111-150-24 within the County of Orange, California. 20 21 Dated:Ju l 3 0 199 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Judge of the Superior Court '7 J()+?ABLE PNf! UP A. PETTY, JUDGE -=Ss+GN?' -2- 7801003821-001813263851.1 a0SI27199 (PROPOSEDIFINAL.nvnconcr^nunc-,-,+'+-,n., 0 0 E=BlT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ROADWAY ACQUISITION A.P. NO. 111-150-24 98-30 BEING ALL OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK "B", OF THE GARFIELD STREET ADDITION TO HUNTINGTON BEACH, IN THE CITY OF HUNIINGTON BEACH, COJJNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED'IN BOOK 7,.PAGES 27 AND 28 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING .THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION: THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 21 LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY,MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE; BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CLAY AVENUE AND MAIN STREET (CLAY STREET AND TWENTY THIRD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 18°5943 " EAST 50.95 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN STREET; THENCE NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 80.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 408.79 -FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70°58'32" TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH, AND 10.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF CRYSTAL STREET(CRYSTAL AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 00°01'28" WEST 933.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG. SAID PARALLEL LINE TO TIC CENTERLINE OF GARFIELD AVENUE (GARFIELD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP). CONTAINING AN AREA OF 9937 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE APART HEREOF. ALDEN &LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SSOCIATES ROADWAY ACQUISITION A.P. NO. 111-1-50-24 rnltz GWEERS-I'LANK xs-utmsvavEYOAS W.O. No. 0879396-1 Date 5/5197 (1012 COWAN, SUITE 210 • IRVINE, CA 92714 Engr . D.C. Chk D.W.Sheet 1 of 2 -714/6600110 FAX-660441l 98-30 EX131fl IT "All LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A.P. NO.111-150-24 BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK "B", OF • THE GARFIELD STREET ADDITION TO HUNTINGTON 13EACI-L IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGES 27 AND 28 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP OF LAND, 15.00 FEET WIDE, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CLAY AVENUE AND MAIN STREET (CLAY STREET AND TWENTY T73IRD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 18°5943" EAST 50.95 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN STREET; THENCE NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 80.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 408.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70°58'32" TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WIT, AND 10.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF CRYSTAL STREET(CRYSTAL AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 00°01'28" WEST 933.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF GARFIELD AVENUE (GARFIELD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP). AS SHOWN ON EXPIIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE APART HEREOF. ALDEN &LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR S S O CI &.TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A.P. NO. 111-150-24 CIVIL ENGINEERS -PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS W.O. No. 0879-396-1 Date 515197 ir012 COWAN. SUrrE 210 • IRVINE CA M14 Engr . D.C. Chk D.W.Sheet 1 oft71416644110 FAX:660.041i _ t. 0 0 HE. COR.. HW 1/4,EXHIBIT "BpMW 1/4. *SEC. 2. T. G 5 10130' R. 11 w. SD911.A VENT I 30' 0' Q 81 4 • GAIFILLU 18 27 I LOT 20 G 4; d, c f0 H 1/2,49 W% c S 1/2,for 20o, l 14 25 24 23 OpB)21 22 0 GLA Y A VENUE ALDEN & ,SSOCIATE XHIB 18012 COWAN. SUtTE•' 210. IRVINE. CA 92714 (714) 660-0110 FAX 660-0418 .OB. I N 18'59'43' E5045' ItiLICATES AREA DESCRIBED HEREIN 37 38 EXHIBIT •8• SItETCN TO ACCOWAUT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ROAD ACQIII SITTC?1 AP. MO. 111-150-24 W.O. No - -r.,rr nr.. f.h4 nw. GO - I H 1VODO' w .47' N 98-30 SCALE: 1'=100' 1F&EM• Date 5/5/97 cc,aof 7 of 2 98-30 HE. COR.. NW 1/4 ,E jQ T "B"NW 1/4. SEC. 2. T. G S. 10.00' R. 11 W.. SBB!-1. ' A 1I M1 1 30' `ark oil Q 814 UHI\L IELD 18 19 H 1/2, LOT 20 25 cp -51/2._ LOT 20 22 ° R=32' - CLAY AVENUE ALDEN & ;SSOCIATES EXHIB 18012 COWAN. SUITE, 210. IRVINE. CA 92714 (714) 660-0110 FAX: 860-0418 27 24 23 .013. / 2G 1 H *00'00, w .47' N 189'43' 5045' 'INDICATES AREA- - DESCRIBED HEREIN 37 38 I E11T11BIT *Be SKETCH To ACCOWANr A LEGAL. DESCRIPTION FOR T1PORARr COHSTF T10N EASEHENT 8-r2 AP. No. 111-150-25 W.O. No Fnnr. DG. Chk. D.W. IV SCALE: 1=100' LEGEND Date 5/5/97 ' ShaAi 2 Of 2__ 0 0 City of Huntington Beach GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY APR2 3 2008 Requesting Department C"'U I-G ©V Person Authorized A C9t7 X12 /LLL/v T' Project Description : +'Ioti a 10 O CohdQWPI-rd to 41 o .4 d S d vlvPa/ I/ S-f.vhee4-v V Or C,!;. Location : PN 1 / " !50-2 T 0271/s v off'do o C v .c / ST o L ( F wfh rN o 2 Al Loci rr S P r74n J Purpose of Pro ject:To N C. E' A o?.O vF p v o 9.%' L. L 'u k 1-0 0 Extent of Project : VAC.A44e- /0 S ic T Ti TGoLA t. 1E V .E vo G- v o-4- £ D ooC. U v-P d b -t'G C ro r S-.U) do rev 471 Environmental Status : 0 L-1 t&J 14 4 d (If available) E . J10 . 0 of 0' 5461 S4 1 A SJE J7.A-rfi '& G - --/,a% N1 ortt5 / vlcl i c7 / 14,'2.COy dP Kd7i''Ovc- 3. Ze8,4.or' 4rg A- 40 6.0 vc d mot.,....y-22-o 8 Signature Date 1. Pro'ect Descri tion State specifically what type of project is planned (i.e., storm drain , street improvements , park development, etc.) 2. Vicinit Ma Submit a map showing the planned project. 3. Location State where in the community the planned project is located.- 4. Pur ose of Pro'ect State why the project needs to be undertaken and what completion of the project will accomplish. 5. Extent of Pro'ect State the size of the planned project in terms of estimated cost, area to be disrupted during construction, length of project, and area to be served. 6. Environmental Status Indicate when and what action the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has taken with regard to the proposed project. City of Huntington Beach 9 R 23 2008 98-30 N.E. COR.. NlY 1/4,EXHIBIT ToNW 1/4, -SEC. 2, T. G 5 10.00' R. 11 W, 51 -Bll-GARFIELD AVENUE 30' 0' 18 27 19 26 SCALE: 1'=100' LEGEND 01 N 1/2, LOT 20 Ci INDICATES AREA DESCRIBED HEREIN 25 v-ed 0 VAcA4-,. lzl __5112, AO. LOT 20 24 T1AI 6 1 Go (j) 23 7 1116 Sr to i - 21 0 0 r CLAY AVENUE i H WOW W .47'38 K 183943' E50.45' EJJIIBIT 8ALDEN &SrcFTCH To ACGOI"FAW A LEGAL DESCRIFr:OIY SSOCIATEx(B FOR ROAD ACQUSITION AP. NO.111-150 24 18012 COXAN, SUITE 210 . IRVINE. CA 02714 W.O. No - - - Date 5/5/47 (714) 660 -0110 FAX: 660-0416 rr ru- nr, r`kt, nW. Chnot 7 of 2 o-UL II:OOam rrom-(14 COO U04!! .r-- x--.30 rxCOxwHC J IDL FS TD i1: TII4-940-U04t! _ a- 0 1-44!!r.uul/UUC r-OVe Rac(orded in the County of Grange , Californiaf27.00dar Car L. 1 l1 IIp11W1111fIi§ 19990592245 1:30pm 08/13/99 005 22056860 22 27 009 0 6.00 21.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 1"ra- 11 RECD1 L%1l7o- I= .C -, "604 --t- .LiLi a G \ od-z'oA 3eo =U"6MS1 f 7--asps, rrr, S:tza CA $;A_r-otiog :rm Lml T.! E VEFc f.ECODE*' 7I7LE(E) 'F-la(f'C._ a 1Zs7 E 1 OF GOfl oJ-fToo City of Huntington Beach APR 2 3 2008 Is DaACripf~ion:Oran-ma DO=anr-Y9ar.DaOrder: TY Co=men CSD 2953.592245 Page: 1 of at: • r RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP DAVID B. COSGROVE (SBN 115564) DOUGLAS J. DENNINGTON (SBN 173447) JEFFREY MELCHING (SBN 180351)FI S r)611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 AGE COUN uP&RcoRcouarCosta Mesa, California 92626-1998 Telephone: (714) 641-5100 JUL3 0 1999 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Unrcer/Clerk BY v`'CCR "Y 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 10 11 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, 12 Plaintiff, ) 13 vs. ) 14 WILLIS MELVIN ELLIOTT, et al., 15 16 17 Defendants. CASE NO. 794272 JUDGE TULLY H. SEYMOUR DEPARTMENT C30 FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION (Code Civ. Proc. §1268.030) Date Action Filed: 5/13/98 Trial Date: None 18 Judgment in Condemnation having been entered in the above-entitled action on 19 SO, 1999, in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of the County of Orange, 20 State of California, and its appearing to the Court's satisfaction that just compensation shall be 21 paid by disbursement from the State Treasurer in the sum of Two Hundred Twenty Thousand 22 ($220,000.00) including interest to Defendants Willis Melvin Elliott and Lola Dean Elliott. Such 23 sum represents the agreed total just compensation award, including interest. 24 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 25 The interests in the real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, 26 more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and 27 incorporated herein by this reference (the "Subject Property"), are hereby condemned to and taken 28 for the purposes of the construction, installation, operation, maintenance and use of the Project -t- rnDnDnccro C,nu, nDnCD nC rnk,nC%1M AT,nkr 1 as defined in the Complaint in Eminent Domain filed in this action (the "Project"). The interests 2 in real property comprising the Subject Property being condemned in this action consist of a 3 permanent easement to Assessor's Parcel Number 111-150-24 described in Exhibit "A" attached 4 hereto, for the purpose widening of Gothard Street. 5 Upon recordation of a CERTIFIED COPY of this Final Order of Condemnation in the 6 Official Records of the County of Orange, State of California, a permanent easement in the 7 Subject Property as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, shall vest in City of Huntington 8 Beach and its successors and assigns. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all taxes and assessments, 10 penalties, and costs which are a lien on the Subject Property and which are apportioned to the 11 City or imposed on the Subject Property for that portion of the fiscal year following the date the 12 Judgment in Condemnation is entered or the apportionment date of October 11, 1998 whichever 13 first occurs, are hereby cancelled and extinguished pursuant to Sections 5081 et seq. of the 14 Revenue and Taxation Code. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the payment to Willis Melvin 16 Elliott and Lola Dean Elliott of the total sum as set forth above includes full and complete 17 compensation for, and has satisfied any and all obligations of the City regarding, the acquisition 18 of the Subject Property located within the City of Palm Springs and bearing Assessor's Parcel No. 19 111-150-24 within the County of Orange, California. _. 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUi 3 0 1999 Judge of the Superior Court -wrgZABLE PH LUP A. PETT` JUDGE=.5S1CAr 2 -2- rnnnnneenr rn• fDTCO nC l `nMnC\ArJ AT1nW •• 0 l 98-30 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ROADWAY ACQUISITION A.P. NO. 111-150-24 to BEING ALL OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK "B", OF THE GARFIELD STREET ADDITION TO HUNTINGTON BEACH, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COJJNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED-IN BOOK 7, PAGES 27 AND 28 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION: THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 21 LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE; BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CLAY AVENUE AND MAIN STREET (CLAY STREET AND TWENTY THIRD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 18°59'43" EAST 50.95 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN STREET; THENCE NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 80.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 408.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70°58'32" TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH, AND 10.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF CRYSTAL STREET(CRYSTAL AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 00°0I'28" WEST 933.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF GARFIELD AVENUE (GARFIELD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP). CONTAINING AN AREA OF 9937 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. ALDEN & SSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS -PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS If012 COWAN. SUITE 210 • IRVINE. CA 97714 7141660.0110 FAX: 660-0412 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ROADWAY ACQUISITION Al'. NO. 111-150-24 W.O. No. 0879-396-1 Date 5/5/97 Engr. D.C. Chk. D.W. Sheet 1 of 2 98-30 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A.P. NO. 111-150-24 BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK "B", OF THE GARFIELD STREET ADDITION TO HUNTINGTON BEACH, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGES 27 AND 28 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP OF LAND, 15.00 FEET WIDE, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CLAY AVENUE AND MAIN STREET (CLAY STREET AND TWENTY THIRD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 18°5943" EAST 50.95 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN STREET; THENCE NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 80.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE , CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 408 .79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70°58'32" TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH, AND 10.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF CRYSTAL STREET(CRYSTAL AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 00°01'28" WEST 933.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF GARFIELD AVENUE (GARFIELD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP). AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE APART HEREOF. ALDEN &LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SSOCIATES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AP. NO. 111-150-24 CIVIL ENGINEERS PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS W.O. No. 0879-396-I Date 515197 Ii012 COWAN, SUrrE 210 • IRVINE. CA 92714 Engr. D.C. Chk D.W. Sheet I Of 2 7141660-0110 FAX :660.0411 •7) N.E. COR., H W 1/4,EXHIBIT ToNW 1/4, -SEC. 2, T. G 5 10.00' R. 11 W, 5B l1.GARFIELD AVENUE 1' 27 4-- U) 0r) 18 I 19 [1C N 1/2, 21 51/2, LOT 20 r GL Y A VENUE ALDEN & SSOCIATE&IB 18012 COWAN. SUITE 210 . IRVINE, CA 92714 (714) 660 -0110 FAX: 680-0418 24 23 N 183443' E 50.45' INDICATES AREA DESCRIBED HEREIN 37 35 E1lIISIT •5• MTGH TO ACGO(f'Atff A LEGAL DESCRIPTIOttI FOR ROAD ACQUISITION - AP. NO. 111-M-24 W.O. No 25 Pnnr r)C f`.ht N 98-30 SCALE: 1'=100' 2G I N 1*0000' W .47' n w. lb ffc,END: Date_ 5/5/57 CknoF 2 nr 7 98-30 HE. GOR., NW 1/4, HW 1/4, SEC. 2, T. Co S. 10.00'EXHIBIT BIT "8" R. 11 W., SBBtf. 4 ' 1' 18 LLJ [1C H 1/2, D 0 0' GARFIELD AVENUE I 14 LOT 20 c1 51/2'- LOT 20 25 24 fp =GLAY AVENUE ALDEN & SSO CIATESEXHIB 18012 COAAN, SUITE 210. IRVINE, CA 92714 (714) 660-0110 FAX: 660-0418 22 R=32' 23 27 2G c o , LO G. N 1Y OW* w .47' Q SCALE: 1'=100' LEGEND N 185443' E50.45' INDICATES AP.FA DESCRIBED HEREIN R 37 38 I I EXHIBIT '8' SZTGH TO ACGOIfAHr A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TE VORARr GONSTRLKTI0l EASEZfNT A.P. NO. 111-150-25 W.O. No Date 5/5/47 Fnnr. D.C. C:hk. D.W. Shppf 2 Of 2_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING ALL OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK "B", OF THE GARFIELD STREET ADDITION TO HUNTINGTON BEACH , IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA , AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGES 27 AND 28 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY , EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION: THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 21 LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40 .00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY , MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES , FROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CLAY AVENUE AND MAIN STREET (CLAY STREET AND TWENTY THIRD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 18°59'43 " EAST 50 .95 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN STREET; THENCE NORTH 71°00 '00" WEST 80 .47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE , CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 408.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70 °58'32" TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH , AND 10 .00 FEET EASTERLY , MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES , FROM THE CENTERLINE OF CRYSTAL STREET (CRYSTAL AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE NORTH 00 °01'28 " WEST 933.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS , ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE CENTERLINE OF GARFIELD AVENUE (GARFIELD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP). AND S, <(r DANIEL RUBIO O* No.8239 (P Exp L* 9OFCAUFO` DANIEL RUBIO, 316,013 P.L.S. 8 39 CRYSTAL STREET PARCEL MAP PERCENTAGES REVISED 1/8/2009 2:29 PM us rom Adjoining After Map is Percentage Estimate Detail Before (SF) Plus from City Vacation (SF) Property (SF) Recorded (SF) of the Increase Share of Consultant Gustafson Originally 85,000 square-feet (SF) Plus 1450 SF (City Easement Vacation) plus 4316 SF (Gergen Property Acquired) = 90,766 SF after map recorded 85,550 1,450 4,316 91,316 39.48%$16,349.3 Geil Originally 43,500 SF Plus 2973 SF (City Easement Vacation minus Geil Property Acquired by Gergen) = 46,473 SF after Map Recorded 43,500 2,973 0 46,473 20.36%$8,429.8 Gergen Originally 7265 SF Plus 5866 SF (City Easement Vacation plus Geil Property Acquired by Gergen) = 13,131 SF after Map recorded (Note: Addition Gergen purchase of City Property to be Included in included on Map and not included in percentage calc.)7,265 5,866 the 5,866 13,131 40.16%$16,632.8 Total 136,315 14,605 150,920 Check 920150 100 00%41 412 00 PARCEL MAP 2008-175 BY CONSULTANT Review Title reports/Legal Opinions Orig.Est. 4700 CO#1 ,.,. Tentative and Final Map Preparation 16,488 Final Monuments 3546 Decipher Errant Title Reports 2,743 Prep of sketches, legal's with Plats, calculations, and street vacation and new drafts of Tentative Parcel Map 8,742 Additional Coordination Meetings (10 mtgs)5193 Total Estimated Cost of Consultant Preparation and recording of Map 1/24734 16678 $41,412.00 1/ Landsca e Easement Pre of $6,152 was removed from revious estimate PARCEL MAP COSTS ABSORBED BY CITY (Estimated) Meetings - 30 to Date (1 hr each *$450) TO DATE 13,500 ADDITIONAL 4500 Staff Time & Research (2005 to and including 2008)15,000 3000 Survey Staff Advice 1500 500 Legal Review 3000 1500 8 Prel Title Reports 3600 Filing Fees for Parcel Map 4068 P!,o t 6 Total Estimated City Costs for Preparation and recording of Map 36,600 13568 50,168 Three G Percentage of Cost Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. ATTENDANCE LIST MEETING FOR DATE : I - -0 a CP-`ST"gc.. - TIME: 2 ',3o - LOCATION : Xj CGG%t>v1 2. 4. NAME REPRESENTING TELEPHONE (OFFICE OR CELL) Jt ,m '4j v n m-P tl(j '7 / v G awl l g AFB`II c 3()T 3.6, t t' &°t`((? s /Zrr ro 0 i 7 -l5 5. 6. wq 7. J r A< U 1. cy 4 PROJECT, r Reh'1 L 7/- 536- $22 - FLAOP • 37 `-1 •S I S-c-ev-c- 6o 'rfi 143Pw 8. UiMIDA 9. 10. / /. l 6 ,u> -1-qGO -q Z /Y-a 9 i•--- '36 Sign-In Sheet - Blank (10 lines) 06-07-05 WAIS Document Retrieval Page 1 of 4 CALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65400-65404 65400. (a) After the legislative body has adopted all or part of a general plan, the planning agency shall do both of the following: (1) Investigate and make recommendations to the legislative body regarding reasonable and practical means for implementing the general plan or element of the general plan, so that it will serve as an effective guide for orderly growth and development, preservation and conservation of open-space land and natural resources, and the efficient expenditure of public funds relating to the subjects addressed in the general plan. (2) Provide by April 1 of each year an annual report to the legislative body, the Office of Planning and Research, and the Department of Housing and Community Development that includes all of the following: (A) The status of the plan and progress in its implementation. (B) The progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs determined pursuant to Section 65584 and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of Section 65583. The housing element portion of the annual report, as required by this paragraph, shall be prepared through the use of forms and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2). (C) The degree to which its approved general plan complies with the guidelines developed and adopted pursuant to Section 65040.2 and the date of the last revision to the general plan. (b) For the report to be filed during the 2006 calendar year, the planning agency may provide the report required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) by October 1, 2006. (c) If a court finds, upon a motion to that effect, that a city, county, or city and county failed to submit, within 60 days of the deadline established in this section, the housing element portion of the report required pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) that substantially complies with the requirements of this section, the court shall issue an order or judgment compelling compliance with this section within 60 days. If the city, county, or city and county fails to comply with the court's order within 60 days, the plaintiff or petitioner may move for sanctions, and the court may, upon that motion, grant appropriate sanctions. The court shall retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order or judgment is carried out. If the court determines that its order or judgment is not carried out within 60 days, the court may issue further orders as provided by law to ensure that the purposes and policies of this section are fulfilled. This subdivision applies to proceedings initiated on or after the first day of October following the adoption of forms and definitions by the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), but no sooner than six months following that adoption. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAI SdoclD=39925714799+4+0+0&WAI Sac... 4/28/2008 WAIS Document Retrieval If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within uci Time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. 65402 . (a) If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, no real ro erty shall be acquired y dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned and no public building or structure s a e constructed or authorized, if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition, such street vacation or abandonment, or such public building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. The planning agency shall render its report as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof within forty (40) days after the matter was submitted to it, or such longer period of time as may be designated by the legislative body. If the legislative body so provides, by ordinance or resolution, the provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to: (1) the disposition of the remainder of a larger parcel which was acquired and used in part for street purposes; (2) acquisitions, dispositions, or abandonments for street widening; or (3) alignment projects, provided such dispositions for street purposes, acquisitions, dispositions, or abandonments for street widening, or alignment projects are of a minor nature. (b) A county shall not acquire real property for any of the purposes specified in paragraph (a), nor dispose of any real property, nor construct or authorize a public building or structure, in another county or within the corporate limits of a city, if such city or other county has adopted a general plan or part thereof and such general plan or part thereof is applicable thereto, and a city shall not acquire real property for any of the purposes specified in paragraph (a), nor dispose of any real property, nor construct or authorize a public building or structure, in another city or in unincorporated territory, if such other city or the county in which such unincorporated territory is situated has adopted a general plan or part thereof and such general plan or part thereof is applicable thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition, disposition, or such public building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency having jurisdiction, as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. Failure of the planning agency to report within forty (40) days after Page 2 o*4 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=39925714799+4+0+0&WAISac... 4/28/2008 ' WAIS Document Retrieval 9 • Page 3 of 4 the matter has been submitted to it shall be conclusively deemed a finding that the proposed acquisition, disposition, or public building or structure is in conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. The provisions of this paragraph (b) shall not apply to acquisition or abandonment for street widening or alignment projects of a minor nature if the legislative body having the real property within its boundaries so provides by ordinance or resolution. (c) A local agency shall not acquire real property for any of the purposes specified in paragraph (a) nor dispose of any real property, nor construct or authorize a public building or structure, in any county or city, if such county or city has adopted a general plan or part thereof and such general plan or part thereof is applicable thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition, disposition, or such public building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency having jurisdiction, as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. Failure of the planning agency to report within forty (40) days after the matter has been submitted to it shall be conclusively deemed a finding that the proposed acquisition, disposition, or public building or structure is in conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. If the planning agency disapproves the location, purpose or extent of such acquisition, disposition, or the public building or structure, the disapproval may be overruled by the local agency. Local agency as used in this paragraph (c) means an agency of the state for the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions within limited boundaries. Local agency does not include the state, or county, or a city. 65403. (a) Each special district, each unified, elementary, and high school district, and each agency created by a joint powers agreement pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 that constructs or maintains public facilities essential to the growth and maintenance of an urban population may prepare a five-year capital improvement program. This section shall not preclude, limit, or govern any other method of capital improvement planning and shall not apply to any district or agency unless it specifically determines to implement this section. As used in this section, "public facilities" means any of the following: (1) Public buildings, including schools and related facilities. (2) Facilities for the storage, treatment, and distribution of nonagricultural water. (3) Facilities for the collection, treatment, reclamation, and disposal of sewage. (4) Facilities for the collection and disposal of storm waters and for flood control purposes. (5) Facilities for the generation of electricity and the distribution of gas and electricity. (6) Transportation and transit facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, roads, harbors, ports, airports, and related facilities. (7) Parks and recreation facilities. However, this section shall not apply to a special district which constructs or maintains parks and recreation facilities if the annual operating budget of the district does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). (b) The five-year capital improvement program shall indicate the http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=39925714799+4+0+0&WAISac... 4/28/2008 WAIS Document Retrieval location, size, time of availability, means of financing, including a schedule for the repayment of bonded indebtedness, and estimates of operation costs for all proposed and related capital improvements. The five-year capital improvement program shall also indicate a schedule for maintenance and rehabilitation and an estimate of useful life of all existing and proposed capital improvements. (c) The capital improvement program shall be adopted by, and shall be annually reviewed and revised by, resolution of the governing body of the district or local agency. Annual revisions shall include an extension of the program for an additional year to update the five-year program. At least 60 days prior to its adoption or annual revision, as the case may be, the capital improvement program shall be referred to the planning agency of each affected city and county within which the district or agency operates, for review as to its consistency with the applicable general plan, any applicable specific plans, and all elements and parts of the plan. Failure of the planning agency to report its findings within 40 days after receipt of a capital improvement program or revision of the program shall be conclusively deemed to constitute a finding that the capital improvement program is consistent with the general plan. A district or local agency shall not carry out its capital improvement program or any part of the program if the planning agency finds that the capital improvement program or a part of the capital improvement program is not consistent with the applicable general plan, any specific plans, and all elements and parts of the plan. A district or local agency may overrule the finding and carry out its capital improvement program. (d) Before adopting its capital improvement program, or annual revisions of the program, the governing body of each special district, each unified, elementary, and high school district, and each agency created by a joint powers agreement shall hold at least one public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given pursuant to Section 65090. In addition, mailed notice shall be given to any city or county which may be significantly affected by the capital improvement program. 65404. (a) On or before January 1, 2005, the Governor shall develop processes to do all of the following: (1) Resolve conflicting requirements of two or more state agencies for a local plan, permit, or development project. (2) Resolve conflicts between state functional plans. (3) Resolve conflicts between state infrastructure projects. (4) Provide, to the extent permitted under federal law, for the availability of mediation between a branch of the United States Armed Forces, a local agency, and a project applicant, in circumstances where a conflict arises between a proposed land use within special use airspace beneath low-level flight paths, or within 1,000 feet of a military installation. (b) The process may be requested by a local agency, project applicant, or one or more state agencies. The mediation process identified in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) may also be requested by a branch of the United States Armed Forces. Page 4 ot44 0 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate ?WAISdocID=39925714799+4+0+0&WAISac ... 4/28/2008 -6 oS Sl{Ntl-5_DF IIQbP or, fPLtA-?TEQ` N N CON QL-PaJrtNJD_ P6A1,nnr M. 00 STPvrt 20o6_002 v --1 O 0 r AiJ f or-P 2 i •/- • c [Jo. ?fig-GY2 oitWts No.m - ASo •Po_c els-- cu-t -C-If - - Ajjff Z •O.L.>-)-& t vw =Sr<l Cry C1 l5•0 -Sp )for ttr.c P' of v1 SN P' J. CT-P-WQ - S rns y :2 rl- sb7-l 3: sT m = VAS--rtes-ra Q06-5-Fold vwq W h ors ST USc-e J T( - W 4}-" .Ti1 r 5 vjmV N P tmfc+lm3T3 0 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 2008-002 (GOTHARD STREET REMNANT) General Plan Conformance d08-002 is a request by the Public Works Department to determine whether the proposed vacation of a right of way easement is in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. 1.tYG'ro A5 -ov ,Wl w,f •. t Please refer to the Vicinity Map attached to the wall behind The easement area proposed to be vacated exists upon a 1400 square foot triangular remnant parcel that the City acquired as a part of the realignment and extension of Gothard Street. The Gothard Street widening and realignment has since been completed and the City's easement on the subject site is no longer necessary for right of way purposes. The Public Works Department requests General Plan Conformance review before proceeding with abandonment. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1622 approving General Plan Conformance 2008-002 finding that the vacation of the right of way easement is consistent with the City's General Plan.ON16l s5 'T f,Avg &%)05T1 WS'r1}(5 coNt..voe5 nom{P-Rf • oN limn SO P-• V 1""S GrtWe- yp p CO A'LXPt 1-OTi(/^ -'C1 tom! E{o1 tT c, II oN 115c} 02) VW% %IJNE 141 L41JNIN W T IS Vft IP61 N LOT Ll PVoS ' - .ZOC5 2-}. fvR SV 61 PP-VP V{ "f F V(Icm (k s qvvvves 8 •`Tiffs'( - w4 owl t5 ' t 51-- 15 (w P'wepTor P , 2 SPi's tW& c Td w IYYIPPIN'Ckf src ovl n V0105 At Pcd L,c P 601pe 001A-aNo-c R letrj pevvew ore-rmT s' 0 5-/ks/* . GENERAL PL CONFORMANCE NO. 2008-002 (GOTHARD STREET REMNANT)TEt'1 t i - t' • General Plan Conformance #2008-002 is a request by the Public Works Department to determine whether the proposed vacation of a right of way easement is in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. • (Please refer to Attachment 2.1 of the Study Session Report) The easement area proposed to be vacated exists upon a triangular remnant parcel totaling approximately 1,400 square feet fronting along the east side of Gothard Street about 150 feet west of Main Street. The right of way easement was originally enacted upon approximately 9,900 square feet of a parcel that the City acquired as a part of the realignment and extension of Gothard Street between Garfield Avenue and Main Street. e An estimated 8,500 square feet of the easement area was utilized for the extension of Gothard Street, while the remaining 1,400 square feet was severed from the parent parcel and currently remains unimproved. • The Gothard Street widening and realignment has since been completed and the City's easement on the subject site is no longer necessary for right of way purposes. o The Public Works Department requests General Plan Conformance review before proceeding with abandonment. Concurrently, the Planning Department is processing Lot Line Adjustment No. 2008-002 which requests that the subject property be consolidated to the surrounding parcel, on which a 29-unit apartment complex is located. • Following consolidation , the applicant must install a 15 foot landscape planter along street frontage as required by the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve General Plan Conformance 2008-002 finding that the vacation of the right of way easement is consistent with the City's Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan. -T,414 cow-""65 ?VZ6*IIFA--TIPN- e I would like to invite any questions or comments from the Commission at this time. t. o5WI N L t t 1 5 'EPcSG: IA J N.E. COR., NW 1/4 NW 1/4, SEC. 2, T. 6 S., R.11 W., S.B.B.M.10.00' SaAl3 VEMI _ LEQEND= INDICATES AREA DESCRIBED HEREIN 30'1140' 'l J / 60• 60' 47 N 71'93'00" W 80.47/ / 'ispo SCALE: 1 "=100' 9.Q $ vo• I pa N 18'59'43" E - - 50.95' / EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHMENT NO. Huntington Beach Map produced by information contained in the City of Huntington Beach Information Services Department Geographic Information System. Information warranted for City use only. Huntington Beach does not guarantee its completeness or accuracy. Map Produced on 4/29/2008 N 0 67 134 STREET NAMES CITY BOUNDARY A/ STREET CENTERLINES (CLASS) Smartstreet Major Collector / Primary Secondary a Residential Travelway Alley ISDBATHS to One inch equals 67 feet HARBOR n Huntington Beach Map produced by information contained in the City of Huntington Beach Information Services Department Geographic Information System. Information warranted for City use only. Huntington Beach does not guarantee its completeness or accuracy. Map Produced on 4/28/2008 N e 0 152 One inch equals 152 feet 304 std STREET NAMES CITY BOUNDARY G Af STREET CENTERLINES (CLASS) Smartstreet , Major ,o Collector Primary Secondary Residential Travelway Allen ISOBATHS h' HARBOR Ye1lawt60--0-r: f 0 -2,q v P tT Avwl t co ?l-v -C -v0c YreR)N/) 6--tlo E P A a t - t t aC 7 7 6 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPT. PURPOSES ONLY. THE ASSES50R MAKES NO GUARANTEE AS TOITS ACCURACY NOR ASSUMES ANY LIABILITY FOR OTHER USES. NOT TO BE REPRODUCED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. m COPYRIGHT ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSOR 2003 4d HOLLY PROJECT n• I.•-131y 935-T -035-036 xo•0.134 5O Ac.GARFIEL STREET -TRACTIR• 1 PROJECr to 935-76-031-034 BO.14049AC. J W 32 - O LOT I Q 3 0 ®O 54 4 O4 12 32 14 1016288 45 o 5' 4 Im•i 1. W 116 POR iMLK 8 1.29 AC. ,a• ,m' IW' On• GOTHARD III' Is'nr I. 4 5 6 33 13 (CRYSTAL STREET I 159-28 1 " = 100' STREET 176.o' 3 3so n POR 84 9 B k P. M. sri TRACT IS'p LOT I 53 0.506AC. 111-15 I- 16289 0 N 7 / l PAR. I 1B / I 55 /%26 19 1y . /1.880 AC. / IPo 25 0 24 21 22 325-35 21'' 24 J _ ADDITION 'w, STREET V GARFIELD STREET ADDITION M.M. 7-27. 28 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK ASSESSOR'S MAP TRACT NO. 16289 M.M. 837 -44. 45 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 111 PAGE 15 IIMARCH 1951 TRACT NO. 16288 M.M. 838-09. 10 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE PARCEL MAP P. M. 325-35