Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Amendment GPA1981001 - Notice of action Letter with Findings & Conditions of ApprovalREQUES. FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date June 5, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by. Charles W. Thompson , City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, l) rector, Development services Subject; ZONE CLLANGE NO881--7 Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternat€ve Aet€ons., Attac mian'tks (Medium-High Density Residential , allowing 22 uni ts per gross acre). cllangea of zoning from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3-22 1~x`r iSSUL Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No, 81-7, A or tzna4c4, Coun c il approve Zone Change No. 81-7 and adopt the attached The Plan ing Commission and Planning Staff recommend that Applicant. R. R, Investment Co. 710 W. Olympic Blvd. Los Angeles, Ca. 90015 ANALYSIS: East of Beach Blvd, Location: North side of Newman Avenue approximately 630 feet to P.3-22 (Medium--High Density Residnetieai,, iillowing Request : A change of zone from R2 (Medivu Density Residential) following finding and conditions, by the following -mate. AYES; Baz nis ter, Kenefick, Paone, Porter NOES; Schumacher,Winchell ABSENT None ABSTAIN: None 22 units per gross acre). :NG COM*41SSION ACTION ON gay l9, 1981: On motion by L€enefick and second by Bannisters Zone Change NO. was approved for recommendation to the City Council with the 3 F I NDINGS . The applicant's request for Zone Change No. 81-7 will not be consistent with the General Plan until approval of Land Use El ement Amendment 81-1. LvVUSSd.. The sob ject property is part of Land Use Element Amendment IN.o. 81-1 . The applicant reques ted the City to concurrently process a zone change along with the General Plan Amend nt. Zane Chan g e No. 51-7 is a request to rezone a Z.5 ears site located on the north side of Newma n Avenue , approximately 630 feet east of Beach Boulevard from R2 (Medium Density B.Resxdential) to R3-22 (Medium -.11igh Density Residential, allowi 22 units per cross ac e) . One house With two out -buildings exis-ts on the site. It is the intention of the, applicant to develop 54 oondq -ni units on the Vite, With access onto Newman Avenue Al. anelysia of the applicant 's proposal is inoluded in Land Use Am,exdzyeut al-1 and Environme n tal Impact Report 81 -2, Area 2.2. the applicant's request for an Amendment (81.1) to the and Use Element of tlie General Plan to redesignate 2.5 acres from Kedi Density Residentia l to High Density Residential must be app owed in order for zone Change No. 91--7 to h e implemented. °fi IRO NT STATUSI were recsived, period ends. May 15, 1981: only consents in support of the project The subj ect property is part of Land Use Amendment No. 81--1 and Environmen tal Impact Report No. 87--2, The environmental review )r motion by Winchell and second by Bannister, 'Environmentalaact report 61 -.4 was approvaa ay mne roLw wing vote: AYES: Bannister , Paone , Porter, NOES: 4wenef i c3 ABSEIy`I' None Ak3STA INr None F NDLNG SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION, The council may consider denying Zone Change No. 81-7 and retaining the R2 zoning designation. This zone designation would allow residential project up to 15 units per gross acre, for a total of 38 units, on the subject property. SUPPORTING INPOFXA TION: 2 Letter of support from adjacent property owners received 1. Ar ea Map Kay 12 , 1981. Ordinance Jamr$ W f'ttIin r r ,I.,rr •, tlrcr[,Vitir,t IIt ntit vi I')n!Iv adtPIanriitti )C omrn.I 't•t ,, u7-4jff;a-28 20t)() M.`to-n `.-I.311(12 yt'lls I-luntington Brach , Calif,e'.ranct P rairie,I x. 75051 May 12, 196 1 Reg. Zorte Case No. 81-7 Mr. Patin and cotmission, rtr c i PL.A ,'P'!;, DEPT. MAY 18 ,981 P. O. 8vx 190 HU 1ng-tbat f ctt, CA P2648 As the r r is ec cel uwrrvr of Urnt pr'opc#r•ty lor:rrtecl at IVAB-17t)54 Vail traffic hazards In the area . ShOOO be widened to a consiste=nt width and the six,,calent plants on the, nortfhw. rst corner of Newman and Cameron Should be clirminated to rpducar r-haen . We do feel that Newman St. between Cameron and Van Buren. oeinq the actual owtters of the abovrr property are in favor of the noosed Boro n St. sp eaking for myself, David Findley, and f"3onatd i reoman all authorized by me to speak in roy b(-half regards Ovs matter. As l now live in Texas,F)avid Findley , should he choose to do so, is Thank you very much for bringing roy opinion to the attention of the commissio n. . /}.`f ` //f5 off^' J '.+'F , )1?rr r! [I'( 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING PROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESI- DENTIAL TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF NEWMAN AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD (ZONE CASE NOS 81-7) HCREAS, pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Law, Commission and all evidence present ed to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper , and consi.s- Case No. 81-7 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due con- sideration of the findings and recomrnend•attona of the Planning the Huntington Beach Panning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone with the general plan, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Hunting, Beach does ordain as follows: ECTION 1. The following described real property,. locatd of Newman Avenue approxima.ttly 630 feet east of leach District" to R3-22, "Medium-high Density Residential I}istriot: u Boulevard, is hereby changed from R2, "Medium Densi ty Resiad tial The west half of the west half of the south- eras t quarter of the nort-wes t quarter, of the soutliwas t quarter Of Section 25, T" rwnhip 5 Scuth., Range 11 West In the Rancho Las Boleas in the ci ty of Huntington Beach, Counts of Orange, Sta t e of California. SECTION 2. The Development Services Director is hereby di- Section 1 hereof. A copy of said district map, as amended hereby trice Map 25-5-11) to reflect Zone C ase No . 81-7, described in eted to amend Section 9061, District Map 30 (Sectional Die- is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3• This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the , day of _ 1981. James W. Patin Secr. Huntington Beach Planning Comm, 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, Calif, Mlr. Patin and commis sion, T11NMNG T"` BEACH PL AP !:3 DEPT. MAY 18 1-9801, P. '0. Boy 190 Hurt2ogtoo Ruch, CA 92048 As the registered owner of that property located at 17648-176st Van $uren St. speaking for myself, David Find ley ; and Donald Freeman being the actual owners of the above property are in favor of the pt >o d' should be widened to a consistent width and the succulent plants on the change. We do feel that Newman St, between Cameron and Von Buren authorized by me to speak in my behalf regards this -cnatt•er. dank corner of Newman and Cameron should be eliminated to arils to the area . As I now live In Texas,David Findley , should he.choose to de So, is ery much for bringing my opinion to the attention of the Larry K. Kloepping Prop. 167-482-28 3702 Cyrus Ct. Grand Prairie, Tx. 75051 Huntington Beach Planning Commission Date; ,pp1ioant Subject. Your application to change the zoning classification upon subject property was acted on by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission at its public hearing on and your request was recommended for- Approval d Conditional Approval (See attached) Denied Withdrawn Pursuant to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, a recotmendatiori for approval or conditional approval by the Planning Commission will be trans- mitted to 1-h e City Council to be acted an at a public hearing. A re" omm- msndation for denial by the Planning commission will allow the City Council to deny the reclassification of property without holding a public hearing unle:;s an appeal is filed to the City Council by you, or another interested party. said appeal must be in writing and must set forth ,in detail its action and grounds by and upon which the party des himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred and fifty ($150) dollars and be submitted to the City clerk's office within ten (10) days of the date of the Planning Commission's action, In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is Very truly yours, James W. 5a7114 Secretary Runt ngton Beach Planning Commission V'4 C1W1 NO. 81--7 fipplicantz R.K. Investment Company 710 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 The applicant's request for Zone Change No. 81 -7 will be consistent R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3-22 (Medium High Density Residential allowing 22 units per gross acre). The subject property is located on the north side of Newman Avenue approximately 850 feet east of each Boulevard. ae t, To permit a change of zoning from 'Lb D1NG wLth the General plan only after approval of Ianc. Use Element Amend ment No .. 81-1. S hereby rtifr that zone Change No . 81-7 was approved by the Planting Conlinissi o t for recommendation to the City Council for on May 19, 1.9'01, upon the foregoing finding.