HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeneral Plan Amendment GPA1981001 - Supporting DocumentsCITY OF H U N TIN G TO N BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUMCATION
To ALICIA WENTWORTH From (;AIL HUTTON
City Clerk City Attorney
Subject Ordinance No. 2501---Zone _Chang from Date July 22, 1981
Medium Density Residential to Medium-al 'h
Density Residential
At the July 20, 198.1 meeting of the City Council, Ordinance No. 2501
referenced above was considered, and a vote of three yes, one abstention
and onn no was tallied. My initial advice given at the City Council
meeting was to consider the abstention as voting with the majority,
equaling the requisite number of four votes to adopt an ordinance pur-
suant to the Huntington Beach City Charter,
On full consideration of the issue, it is my firm opinion that the
ordinance was not adopted. The specific requirement of the Huntington
Beach Charter is that all ordinance+s must be adopted by a vote of four
affirmative votes. Since the rule contained in Robert's Rules of Order
adopted by the City Council provides for counting an abstaining vote as
coinciding with the majority (see Robert's Rules of Order No. 46) and
is a procedural rule, it is my firm opinion that substantive vote of
four affirmative votes contained in the City Charter overrides the
procedural rule established by Robert's Rules of order, Therefore,
Ordinance No. 2501 was not adopted.
If the Council wishes to reconsider this ordinance, it will be necessary
to ' rodtl e t e ordinance and vote upon it five days or longer thereafter.
GAIL HUTTON
City Attorney
GH,mcb
cc* Charles 14. Thompson, City Administrator
James 7'alin, Director, Development Services
Art J. Polger, Deputy City Attorney
Page #10 - Council Minutes - 7/20/81
On motion by Mandic, second Thomas, Council adopted Ordinance No. 2500, after
reading by title, by the following roll call 'vote:
AYES. MacAllister, Thomas, Pattinson, Bailey, Mandic
NOES: None
ABSENT: Finley, Kelly
ORDINANCE NO 2501 FAILED - ZC NO 81-1 - N/NEWMAN/E/BEACH
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2501 for Council consideration - "AN ORDI-
NANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9051 THEREOF TO PROvIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH OF NEWMAN AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD (ZONE CASE NO. 81-7)."
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Thomas, to adopt Ordinance No. 2501,
after reading by title. The motion failed by the following roll call vote:
AYES. MacAllister, Thomas, Bailey
NOES: Mandic
ABSTAIN: Pattinson
ABSENT: Finley, Kelly
ORDINANCE NO 2502 ADOPTED - PERTAINING TO INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION IN MIXED USE
DEVELOPMENTS
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2502 for Council consideration - "AN ORDI-
NANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9511.4, 9511.7 AND 9530.4 PERTAINING TO INDUSTRIAL
CONSTRUCTION IN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS."
On motion by MacAllister, second dailey, Council adopted Ordinance No. 2502,
after reading by title, by the -ollowing roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Thomas, Pattinson, Bailey, Mandic
NOES: None
ABSENT: Finley, Kelly
ORDINANCE NO 2503 - ADOPTED - CONVENIENCE MARKETS COM3INED WITH GASOLINE STATIONS
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2503 for CO".irlcil consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY AMENDING SECTIONS 9430.8 AND 9472.2, AND ADDING SECTIONS 9431.8.1 AND
9430.8.2 RELATING TO CONVENIENCE MARKETS COMBINED WITH GASOLINE STATIONS IN
COMMUNITY BUSINESS AI10 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS."
On motion by MacAllister , second Bailey, Council adopted Ordinance No, 2503,
after reading by title , by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Thomas, Pattinsun , Bailey, Mandic
NOES: None
ABSENT: Finley, Kelly
Page #11 * Council Minutes - 7/20/81
ORDINANCE N0`,2504 - INTRODUCED -SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT - RAINBOW DISPOSAL
Following dis ussion it was tI consensus of Council to change this ordinance
from an "Urgency " ordinance to a regular ordinance.
The City Clerk pa°e.,ented Ordinance No. 2504 for introduction - "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY OF HU1TINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE
SUPPLEMENTAL AGRE1ENT NO. I TO F RANCHISE AGREEMT WITH RAINBOW DISPOSAL
COMPANY, INC.,"'
NOE5: None
ABSENT: Finley, Kelly
On motion by MacAllister, second Thomas , Coun ,il approved introduction of Ordi-
nance No. 2504, after ading by title, by the following roll call vote;
AYES: MacAllister, ll4omas, Pattinson,-Bailey, Mandic
or Pro Tem Pattinson adjoined t,Ke regular meeting of the City Council to
munday, August 3, 1981 at 6:30 P.IM; in the Council Chamber.
ADJOURNMENT ;
ATTEST:
City ler and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
1
7
Page #14 - Council Minutes - 8/3/81
ORD NO 2501 - ADOPTED - ZC 81-7 - N NEWMAN - E/BEACH
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2501 - AN :RDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORC°NANCE CODE BY AMENDING
SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH OF NEWMAN AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD (ZONE CASE NO. 81-7).
Councilman MacAllister stated that he believed this ordinance should be before
Council for adoption, rather than introduction. The City Attorney reported
on the matter.
On motion by MacAllister, second Bailey, Council adopted Ordinance No. 2501,
after reading by title, by the following roil call vote-
AYES: MacAllister, Thomas,Finley„ Bailey
NOES: Mandic
ABSENT: `telly, (Pattinson, out of room)
ADJOURNMENT
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned
to Monday, August 17, 1981 at,6:30 P.M. in the Council Chamber.
City-clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach , California
ATTEST:
MayortCrt y IfF v
Page #13 - Council Minutes - 8/3/81
GARFIELD/MAIN/HOLLY CROSSING
Councilman Thomas asked the Public Works Directo, if he had any information
regarding automobiles crossing the divider at Holly Street, Main Street and
Garfield Avenue to enter;Pierpoint Drive.
The Public Works Dirrctor'stated that Council would receive a report. He
stated that a ditch would be cut through to make it extremely difficult to
cross the ditch and jump the curb at the same t=mei
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - REPORT
Councilman Thomas reported on efforts made by the comet-ttee composed of
Councilmen MacAllister, Pattinson and himself>regarding the traffic problem
on Pacific Coast Highway. He stated that the State would place "No Parking"
signs from Warner Avenue to the bluff, south, block off entrances to State
beach and allow the city ticketing power, d that possibly the same thing
would be done from Beach Boulevard to the Santa Ana River. He spoke regard-
ing the possibility of installing temporary dividers from Beach Boulevard to
the Santa Ana River, and stated that staff would also work toward having
Cal-Trans prohibit parking on their property along the north side of Pacific
Coast Highway.
RESOLUTION NO 5025-ADOPTED - ESTABLISHES "NO PARKING - STANDING & STOPPING
ZONE' - PCH
The City Administrator brought Coun,il's<attention to Resolution No, 5025 -
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL IiF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING
A "NO PARKING, STANDING AND STOPP !G ZONE" ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN
MILE PORT 27.0 AND THE NORTHERLY CITY LIMITS."
A motion w,s made by Thomas, second MacAllister to adopt Resolution No. 5025.
Following discussion, the motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES; MacAllister, Thomas, Finltiy, Bailey
NOES; ,,i,.ne
ABSTAIN; Mandic
ABSENT: Kelly (Pattinson, but of room)
ORDINANCE NO 2504 - ADO`SUPPLEMENTAL AGRMT #1 - RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO INC
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2504 for Council consideration - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF iUNTINGT"" BEACH AUTHORIZINfj THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO EXECUTE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENR `D. 1 TO FRANCHISE,AGREEMENT WITH RAINBOW
DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC." t
On motion by MacAllister, second Mandic, Council adopted Ordinance No, 2504 after
reading by title, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister.4 Thomas, Finley, Bailey, Mandic
NOES; None
ABSENT: Kelly (Pattinson, out of room)
I
I
Page #2 - Council Minutes - 7/6/81
There being no one to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed,
either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
on motion by MacAllister, second Thomas, Council denied the appeal filed by
Van/De Publishing Company dba Pennysaver to the denial of the application
for a noise variance by the followin, roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Thomas, Pattinson, Finley, Bailey, Mandic
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kelly
PUBLIC HEARING - ZC 81-7 - APPROVED - NEWMAN/BEACH - R & R INVFSTMENT -
ORD NO 2501 - I R VED
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
to considr Zone Case No. 81-7, a request to change the zoning on 2.50 acres
of property from R-2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3-22 (Medium-High
Density Residential) allowing twenty-two units per gross acre. The subject
property is located on the north side of Newman Avenue, approximately 630
feet east of Beach Boulevard.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publica-
tion and posting had been met and that she had received no communications or
written protests to the matter.
Councilman Pattinson left the room.
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
Richard Harlow addressed Council and stated that he represented the appellant
who was ill, and that the appellant agreed with the staff recommendation.
There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no
protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor,
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No, 2501 for Council consideration -AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON F-r"ACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY AMENDING SECtION 9061 THEREOF' TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF NEWMAN AVENUE AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD (ZONE CASE
NO. 81-7)."
On motion by MacAllister, second Bailey, Council approved Zone Case 81-7 and
,.pproved introduction, after ,eading by title, of Ordinance i`lo. 2501 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, lhomas, Fiviley, Bailey
NOES: Mandic
ABSENT: Kelly (Pattinson out of room)
Councilman Pattinson resumed his seat.
r'
MINUTES
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, Jul; 6, 1981
A tape recording of this meeting is
on file in the City Clerk's Office
Mayor Finley called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 P.M.
The Flag Ceremony was conducted by Girl Scout Troop 1262, Leader Evelyn
Synder, sponsored by Grace Lutheran Church of Huntington Beach. The Pledge
of Allegiance was led Alice Boulter,
The invocation was given by Diane Synder.
ROLL CALL
Present: MacAllister, Thomas, Pattinson, Finley, Bailey, Mandic
Absent. Kelly
MISS HUNTINGTON BEACH AND COURT
Mayor Finley introduced Fran Wachter, 2nd Vice President of the Women's Divi-
sion Jr. Chamber of Commerce who presented Miss Huntington Beach Gina Rivadeneyra
and her Court: Karen Gatlin, Karen Buder, Chris Land and Leslie Colyar.
SUPERVISOR HARRIETT WIEDER COMMENTS
Supervisor 1tieder spoke regarding her trip to Washington 0. C. and conference
with the President. She stated that she saw control returning to local govern-
merit and, the possibility of a percentage of income tax monies being returned
to the State. She then commented on the Boucher land fill, debris in the chan-
nels in Huntington Harbnur, the Bolsa Chico Linear Park and Pacific Coast Highway.
PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF NOISE VARIANCE - DENIED - VAN DE PUBLISHING
DBA PENNYSAVER
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for the continuance of
a public hearing opened c;t May 18, 1981 to consider the denial of the applica-
tion for a noise variance to Van/De Publishing Company dba Pennysaver pursuant
to S. 8,40.150 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code The property was located
at 7601 Murdy Circle.
The City Clerk stated that she had received a letter form the appellant request-
ing that the hearing be discontinued due to the relocation of the facility to
Brea.
Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission
may 19, 1981
Page 8
ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY KENEFICK THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVED GENERAL, PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 81-1 FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, THROUGH THE ADOPTION OF AMENDED RESOLUTION
NO. 1273, SAID RESOLUTION AMENDED TO DELETE AREA OF CONCERN 2.1, TO
MODIFY AREA OF CONCERN 2.3 AS REFLECTED BY THE AMENDED STRAW VOTE ON
THAT ITEM, AND TO INCLUDE THE FULL COMMISSION ROLL CALL VOTE ON EACH
OF THE STRAW VOTES TAKEN ON EACH AREA OF CONCERN. MOTION CARRIED BY
THE FOLLOWING VOTE :
AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, 41inchell, Porter, Panne, Schumacher
NOES : None
ABSU 7T : None
ABSTAIN t None
. ZCIE . VGE NO. U-7
V Kcdf& R. R. Investment Cam any
A requ est to charge the zoning from R2 (Medium De: :ity Residential) to
83.22 (Medium-High Density Residential allowir 2 units per gross
acre ) o4 2.5 acres of property located on the Q side of Newman Ave-
nue approxim ately 850 feet east of Beach Boule% 1.
Staff pointed out that this is a new approach in processing a zone
charge coi . tirrently with the requested General Plan redesignation
(this request had been addressed as Area of Concern 2.2 in the Land
Est Element amendment).
Ths public bearing was opened.
Dan Salceda; representing the applicant, spoke in support of the
zone change. In response to the Commission's concern about the den-
sity bonus when the General Plan bad been discussed, Mr.. Sa,lced.a
indicated that they would not ask later for the density bonus, as it
is their intention to build only 54 units on the site. This type
of development, he said, would be the most compatible with the sur-
rounding residential areas.
There were no other persons to speak for or against the proposed
change of zone, and the public hearing was closed.
The Commission briefly discussed how access would be taken to the
ultimate development on the site:
ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY BANNISTER ZONE CHANGE NO. 81-7
WAS APPROVED FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION,
WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE;
FINDING;
The applicant 's request for Zone Change No. 81.8 will be consistent
with the General Plan only after approval of Land Use Element
mendment No. 81-1.
8 - 5-19-81 - P.C.
i
Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission
may 19, 1981
Page 7
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BANNISTER AND SECONDED BY PORTER TO AMEND
TEE ORIGINAL MOTION , SAID AMENDMENT TO DELETE THE LAST LINE OF
PAGE 42 OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND ITEMS I THROUGH 5 ON PAGE
43 THE LAND CASE ITT REFERRING TO DENSITIES AND LOCATIONS
OF UNITS WITHIN A F'U'TURE PLANNED DEVELOPM'E 7T ON AREA OF CONCERN
NO. 2.3. MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED BY THE :OLLM ING VOTE:
AYES: F nxtister, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher
1 :.Kenefick, Paone
ABUT: None
ABS'I*AIN: None
THE ORIGINAL NOTION FOR THE STRAW VOTE TO APPROVE THE REQUEST
:G' AREA OF CONCERN NO. 2.3, AS AbMNDED ABOVE, CARRIE D BY THE
?OLLOWIN VOTE:
P,)':ES: Bai),nister, Kenefick Winchell, Porter , Paone , SOhu ocher
NOES: No
AH$SENT> Nine
IS:B'STAIV : gone
The. Commi.ss.ion recessed at 9:50 p.m. and reconvened at 10:05 p.m.
AREA OF CONCERN NO. 3.1
icant: Initiated b the Cit Council
A proposal to redesignate 116.15 acres of laid, in the Townlot
Specific Pla n, Area "A" from, loo density residentia l to raecllumdensity resi dential.
The public ]Hearing on Area of annex wao op.e;d and
Coem issi O e i th
Staff reported that approva l of this propo sa l will brio the land,
use designatio n and the zoning for the area into consistency.
claFsed when to one was present to addre
for or against the proposal.
Brief Commission discussion took place.
A MOTION WAS DE BY PAONE ASS l 1t}D BY BANNISTER FOR A STRAW
VOTE TO APPROVE TIX P =VESTED REDESIONATION FOR AREA OF CONCERN
NO. ; 1. MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Paone, Stbtxtuacher
NOES: None
ASSENT. None
ABSTAIN: None
ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY BANNISTER ENVIRONMENTAL IN
REPORT NO. 81-2 WAS ADOPTER AS AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Bannister, Winahell, Porter, Paane, Schumacher
NOES: Kenefick
ASSENT: None
ABSTAIN: none 5-19-81 - P.C.
T
Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission
may 15, 1981
Page 9
AYES: Bannister , Kenefick , Porter, Pone
IDES : Winche11, Schumacher
ARS Er3T: MorsAI AIN: z oa a
CO'WIT ION , EXCEPT I ON NO. 81-12 (APPEAL)
A, is 7 , t _& A 1ellant : Jerr v Ja wsid.
To pe t a six (6) foot high block wall to encroa zA five (5)
:feet into t front yard setback on property located on the west
of Marina View Street and north of Los Patos,
Savoy P.ellavia reported that the applicant has requested a con
inuence to the next meeting..
he lic hearing was opened and closed.
ON MOTSON BY W'I CHELL ANA SECOND BY FXC'K CONDITION AL BHP--
lION NO. 81-12 WAS CO I2 t3ED TO THE NESTING OF JUNE 2, 1951 AT
TAB REQ T OF THE APPLICANT, BY THE ?OLLOWING VOTE:
ASr Bannister., Kenefick, Wirehell, Porter, Pne, SchuzacherNOR$: None
ABS9NT« None
,LBSTAIN: None
CONDITIONA L USE P 3IT NO. 81-15,1TENTATIVH TRACT NO. 11498
A lioant : Robert 0. Mickelson
To permit the conversion of 120 apartment units
eazst side of Magnolia Street appro mately 520.
Garfield A enue int o condominiums.
loca=te!
Savoy Se11avia reported that the applicant has also requested a
special permit on this proj ec t.
The pubic hearing Was opened.
Robert Nickelson addressed the C=nissio to ask for approbate of
his project, explaining why the request had been filed ahead of
th, s condominium conversion ordinance, which he said was due to,
a financial &ittiation which allows him to make coup tmdsts 7aowc
thsat be might not be able to make later on. He pointed out that
it is planned to provide 25 percent of the units as afrordeble
housing within a $40, 00'0 to $60,000 price range, and that although
the project cannot meet the development standards of the current
PRD ordinance the quality of the project is high, particularly
in the type of open space provided. In response to questioning
from the Commission, Mr.Mickelson said that he had personally
hand-delivered the required notices to his tenants on May 12, 1981.
The public hearing was closed.
g_5-19-81 - P.C.
Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission
may 19, 1981
Page 10
In the following Commission discussion the Commission considered
whether or not such a project would really be able to provide afford-
able housing and whether or not retaining the rental stock might
not be a more effective way of providing that lower cost housing.
It was the consensus of the Commission that the request is premature
and should be delayed until after processing of the condominium
ordina,ce . Jim Georges , legal counsel, estimated that the ord i n-
ance will take from four to seven weeks to prepare for Co,mission's
cons i deration . Mr. Mickelson then requested a two month's continuz-
anc:e of his request.
ON I,10TTOIT $'BAN1,71STER AND SECOND BY PORTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO.. 81-15 AND TENTATI VE TRACT NO. 11498 WERE COINTINOED TO TIM REGULAR
IEFTTNG O- JULY 21, 1981, AT THE REQUEST OF TEM APPLICANT, BY !I,T E
F'OLtQWIN "tl'QT :
AXES, Saan.ister, Eenefick , Winchell , Porter, Pone,, Schumacher
3QSS: None
ASSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ZONE CHANGE NO. 81-5
A licantt Max S. Schreiber /James A. Thomas
To permit a change of zone from C3 to Rl, Townlot Specific ]r l r on
property located on the northeast corner of Orange Avenue 11th
The public hearing was opened, and closed when no one was present to
speak to the matter.
ON J' JT;ION BY WX_NC ,L AND SECOND BY RENEFIC1 ZONE ORANGE NO. 91-5
VV .9 FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION
WITS TTE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE-
8
A change of zone from C3, General Business District, to Townlot
Specific P lan Area One, Section A is consistent with the General
Plan Designation of Medium Density Residential.
2. The proposed zone change is co mpatible with surrounding land uses,
because they are generally residential.
AYES. Bannister, Tienefick, Winchell,Porter, Paone, Schumacher
NOES. None
ABSENT. None
ABSTAIN; None
-10-5-19-81 - P.C.
rP92 '&.'e fem. Xv " tlr` rte..1rasn, 6mfel
April 27, 1981
Mr. James Palmn
Director, Development Services
City of Huntington Beach
P.O, Box 190
Huntington Beach, C`, 92648
f f4 -... ft; qq--
OEPT
APR 3 0 1981
P. 0.gySfJA190
HurAng on aeach, Ceti 9254 3
Dear Mr. Pali-n:
As the applicant for a General Plan Amendment and zone
change on the 2.5 acre parcel located on the north side of
Newman Street east of Beach Boulevard, I hereby request your
department to process a zone change to R3-22 concurrently with
the General Plan Amendment.
The purpose in asking for the concurrent processing is to
indicate our specific density needs and to expedite processing.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sir..cerely,,-
RICHARD SCHWARTZ
FANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE 0' THE C, d"'T''' OF dUUING'TGN BEACH
MENDIN r THE HUNTING ON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
BY AMENDING SE T-101 9061 THEREOF '1Y) PROVIDE
OR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R DI JH DENSITY RESSI--
DENTIAL TO dED'IU4'4_;1I DBNSITY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT ON REAL PROP82TY 10CATET) NORTH OP
NEWMtAN AVENUE AND EAST O+' ':EACH BOULEVARD
(ZONE CASE NO, 81--7)
WHsw , pursuant to the state P1annt n g and Zonin Law,
the Huntin g ton Reich 'ta nnin Commission and Huni-initon Beach
City Council have h ad aoparate public h earings relative to Zone
Case No. 81-7 wherein bot h bodies ha v e 'efully considered
all infor mation prQsented a t Said hearth s, and after K e con-
sideration of the Kadi n s and re C?1x;i1GYlEf J75 of the Pla n ning
Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the
City Council finds that such zone chan g e is proper, and consis-
tent 'vTtt h the general plan,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntin gton
Beach does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The followin g described real pr operty , located
north of Newman Avenue approx i mately 630 feet east of Beach
Boulevard, is here by chan;e1 Crom R2, "Median Density Residential
District" to R3-22 , "Meditrn-high Density Residential District:'"
The west h al f of the went half of the south-
east quar t er of the northwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of Section 25,Township 5
South , Range It West in the Rancho La s Bolsas
in the city of Huntington Beach, County of
Orange, State of California..
SECTION 2. The Development Services Director is hereby di-
rected to amend Section 9061, District Hap 30 (SeotIona? Dis-
trict Map 25-5-11 ) to reflect Zone Case No. 81-7, described In,
Section ,l hereof . A copy of said district map, as amended hereby
/ahb
5J15/81 1.
is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take eff eet thirty days
after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Connell of the City W
Hunti,nton Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day 1981.
ATTEST ;s t P RO u' ED AS TO FORM:
C],rCity
I
HE/IE ED A14D APPROVED:
City Administrator
_ \TI TIATED A14D APPROVED:
irect
AGFNbA ROUTING $LIP
I 1 1 1 i inaxicial impact Report - Unbudgeted items over $500
11 f 1 INSURANCE REQUIRED
1-1 I 1 BONDS REQUIRED
11 [I RCA
AC! iVI t[sI I STR AT tON
[ 1 CITY CLERK I~O1 AGENDA
PIG S J70
INITIATING QEPARTMENT Development Services
SUBJECT REQUEST FOR ORDINANCE FOR ZONE CHANGE NO 81-7,
AGENDA DEADLINE DATE
To Adn[InlstratI n
MEETING, DATE
I LEGAL DEPARTMENT WITH EXHIBITS
I 1 IN17IATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/APPROVAL By:,:..
I- [ 1 Ordinance Exhibit$
I I Resolution i 1 Exhibit,t
I l 1 1 Corltroct or Agraement 11 Exhiibit%
TRACT NO. 439TRACT NO. 4j28TRACT NO. 46812TRACT N 4845TRACT NO 6cV3kQ, 16' NO 4328,,f 17 'V6AL M 16.3,5MM.163-15,1616.E-r r8M -MM M. 169- 9, IC4 M 226-2 24