Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
General Plan Amendment GPA1985002 - Supporting Documents
dt a IN , o : ',- cc W-15 M,, y i=t:1ic Qui.L1-tiu4 Corp. wowq7 n e, :v ts.' Public. 'acip l a i Parr't t !I the fa _,M.owla , r NOR . .Ilepuy,m y cleric pr ome.<.a, r lizaze e N. 2821-1 ? ITY 1.1,E HIUNTINGTO i BEAC41 THY HUN"'INGTON AI°£FNDING SECTION 90 641 Tdi' kt :,t, TO P OV I£ : FOR CHANGE Oi f1-SSIONAL DISTRICT TO QITALIFrUI : D1UM- I1 U J tSL k7 DINED WITH SENIOR RT,SITIFRTt147_ I`INFLOP'ME.'N1 OF REAL PF WEST OF ST'R1Nt1D I.,N STREET, S(iL T Y ,)F EOitNGE AY tTUE (114 uni.ta at 17 gri ts oer ;er.". n . i, t a:i'+; y Q 4'A l l t ti e!" " c,,u 821--Ti, af te r rivaling (fy 4.1t Io AYES: Kelly, :tauA,1«xC;C r, NOES. Nom., WHO TQw,; -- AN ORDINANCE OF TIM BEA H ORDINANCE CODE ET :' ZONING FROM OFFICE PRO- •."iI)ENTI.AL T,I.3TRiC't, COIF- .OPRRTY GENRR LL'Y LOCATED (.'C 'E ASR No. adopted Ordinance No. -III vote; sallezy, Grepu x4 IN1'k+ Irtd_0 ,.AP:'?:, r i7T'A.1,Ok 3C RO ESSI NAr TFAACHT1 G OR CITY PITOP'ERTY Ti: -. %t'puty City C.,f'. kt p fdt.a0 e orill an,, E No. 28:1, 1(r intro,l ctioi -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HLNT AGION B:;AGI AMk:S DING T IT17NTIdCTOb; BEACP mmI- (.IPAI. CODE IY AMENDING SECTION 1-2.48.1,00 10 ADD A ''ROVI'3iON DZSA:. O ING PROF--: ^,HSIONAL ACHING ON 41`.tY Pk:tiP :kNT'!:'." The birec for of l:.urrnt t?, f :rv;;.ce.s «,ta e'.ci t4jit wi,ss t o -umi t'zAie ,ai,w`. t. :kT..Iti tee Mile utIli2InL p ;Emir tar;::i: tic =arts. n taetirz y F.11u, ec;a.. vi. Ordinance No. 2824, Mm 14';:'. 1 AYES:; Kelly, MacAlnistr NOES: Note , ABSI'htl Thomas STATE AND T TIONAR .4t AItTt - C1 8I) 7C;E t<f knt ont W ti iei rt 'at;;uu Chart; ,.unull .. N the 01 y iptroductiu roll cal l vote: a t$ City Ad>u• Wa'eratov .F,;.lzed A;Cty, , 11, t.:.1 I. t+r L'ity 11';dt rec;t:;.ved an award ,or Out standfn ;FInrnc.ial zrvn tiro f;a1ifortsin Society of Muni,ci,pa . int ati nn from t %Lo Ur,.t. F .:RFjiAS SCAN P.., !'::ft, c t. iyta' p col area and t n, vu in the mrt°i l a" : t r t . 100014 E Slip}i:inn wai, in-!"' sar.fn CtuA,,. Ay' Kelly; Mac,, ABSENT: "Thomas CLEAN SWEEP WEEK FUNDIN G f>:.w Goore staff to com- !e c Hou€-rwrwizur•s Associatio ns y the following roll call ....awing oi:,ie:itrtsio tk 4,a' i,, Mvet,, Ccainclt C;u ncnurrcd wi.tz, the City Aumioibtrator'rk I kL +•ia to tAiW ,lands tr;r the f+rcje.c*t: It was suggested that. businesses to tae f:,[ L , air;; t„t=r1t ;ait:t.en lot. CON'1'RDI, OE TOXIC WAS' IN 5 ET FR EYST `i It RECO?SMEfl )ATIOiv R yor 4anc fc rkifr rrr'a ts. s t z i r„ , a:t:a. 8 the dumping of taziL., wa,k.a.s• .-to Ci ns. It was suggested 0 'at nu citizens regard ing the nc skier jr water bills tt was Council ccnt+ensus to stair to the dumping ui toxic waste in A v My's sewer DENSITY CALCULATIONS DISCUSS...STAFF Discussion was held regarding methods oo tcceive(t a complaint the matter to staff., mc't ! srs, "Ma l repor t to! commo dore rriati on regarccla vellnh lo 1:. cruissic;r was held repard °arrf ed CC'N density. city from In. response to an inquiry by council woman Services stated that a report concerning t seated to Council in the near future, D TO STAFF FOR R .VIEW MD tv SasitatIon Distriol regard-- sewer :tystect by priva"e citi- be eatauilshed and to inform SAINT RE DENSITY REFERRED TO or of Development Services tayor stated that he had =.n and that he would refer t :."ND 1",'s!` : NT ,i6. 8 i i PA RA 2.1 At a V0 M il;ii ArIVE "`1" 4. l > r`r E C.:e: ia`h . Wi n 1.°i (t;:. 'I.Pd?I, .,+ t . Otr DECEMOS 3,1'') Th is Vot -r W OWSAVY :, 140 Ali °V X3t. W; 'rt AS, _:.7 iruvo i tool t. c::,iiwary 7p Mee r 1.'p Mal of IQ 7+YI.?i'ei PtCed"s sft?E'.ignatiO Cd' k, P' -r .' r r 14- wan ` r p oVe4l e tr061 !V 9 due to t a t a o y i r "t "J Cart. The P lan inq Comm insi on's concern at, thp `i-it ;U it i"Ir..i Sty' -As thi t it *a 7, Cum b igh f3n5ity idP nk i.al land al.;,o tiro , 1.gr"fot i m "v1i'`, .a1 1 r, you C: t n- site. then the applicant muld a pply d(' s ' . "r tir',ii to "s7zvo In ' .,uff ix r +rtnved from thc a.-a:ni a 4t"i Q on v alid s t • A r V3,pr IW, to Planning commi s sion wi. ; b. uC)kiVo w i'1_" lr..mV a • i ora Tit _ =t_ My as Spnior pr o j e ct. ;u aid W n w i l k on the `i„ t;u . Staff r* ,.S. ear ,tte `-i;s i'r'th. ad. Ti, . 4'i: t .vinq ti 1A 1 qoa l and recomm a nde4 that now C` r'-'n r,t Plan Land Use desie ' n ,vit t at ;'odium High Density :t nlrrr .ma i,clet'it ; ial bo rree'=att<d ctnc # r h"n app l ied to the subject; prop;.r+,j The only zoning twllic k .: 1 ,kbr con si stent -with this deaignat •,inu mould to ?r_ a.r F aunin`t when combined with the SR Suffi x. Any attempt tt- rdtls{ttve Me :R suffix would then require sa conc u rr ent Gen eral Flan ame ndme nt for a c hange to a non-Senior rieec"idential land one desi g nat ion, Staff feels that this requirement will proviQ ample loot tiun fro m future atton pt to build nor Senior pro j ects and that it will Io of value on Area 2.1 of this ; ndment :.i well a s an fut ure projects i n other areas. In or der to implemen t W, new « e 1i ;nat .ion 's taff ha s added Section 4.1 to rand Up e Element Ame ndment WK a Thi s new section i m.ini.utrait i,velV c.rear.es the now tan! Use dµaiyllation. Creati on of the now designati on ha s been «iciv +:?r'tised und e r Negative Dec l aration No. 86-,1. To approve this dos3.# rltir)n the Planning Commission will need to open the Pub lic Hearing on Area 4a 1 of the , amendment and appr,ovo Q H Nv aitiv'e L1eeclart a tion. Land docnn Iesid need St aff has :e High Dens it application approval of this resolu °ion :Find P3 before appial aeiiicrna i nu t e n r 1enaLt. Amen rant and Elk 65-2 have always ility f a V-d1:1a High TM)r no i.ty land use oninu, `here i 5 no neod t t, to-process the uirlg the new Medium iii ih : nsity Senior tat to the subject t,r+:sl:t r tMv. There 1,s also n the Public Hearing an Area 2.1. c,ot led new Resolution 134gfcl io ni r kesidential land use des of that deSigna :.ion ,to 'Arerya 2.1 i wand Use Flernen! Amendment 85-3. ion. adoption of the nation And the Medium, Staff recommends the th the adoption of (41 t u r onr /-<: n : `:3Fl. g. 1LLit av * of now-Sp zo ning 15(8). TTh Would requ 1 uild.inq plans for the s cono t:ion rats ,,lacers on the or a density b`Eoriui Find,...,i '.i: innd on gage 4 of t h #7, THE P''t:I.. c fit'.APTN ,± (A5aMIN STRA,I NE' r3 stay no one z t t seta-to op &I and the publ ic hear ing wa-, cn si.gna e t:abli one Mr. Sang s te r, At torney, "tt-ral parar 'feti-r y.t:Yut- ning that'rict s. € r awn tx;zitrictn i n the different Plan may be residential, o u or add the tt,etc.)_ 961 staff 1egart°.. g t5ts^3I or gtin; y-At;{miri ;itr at ive Kn r a! Plan veto fort t= A',ing down into SPt-- tl'. i'iv sio n 9, estabiishea t:hr.; areas. (Example: Genpras break it down to Rl, H2, 8` . Commissioner Porter then a*keyd,,tt tk.t;r.o in designation for Senior Residential? Do ts the Scat rfquir"t.hat tlrorto h a density r?y,Resignation Can Senior Reske mi t an area designation in At Genera l Plan irrespec tive of ty densit y that i s going to apply? Mr. Sangster, Attorney, in general planning to a areas. 1b,1 .i t z"t'Jr$tinks to re com unu1 y soli r.tK t no appro .; via , of Zone Case (sign Hnview Board approval of if further rp^ommends that a In it total units can t.he' a.it t, fur approval of the 4opk'Chango it has been the normal prac tice- ty guidelines to General F1. Hal Si nmons,- Staff , st,8tect that in the designation . in the neral Plan , each density limits . 'Th e isn't any' inn, from establ ishing a senior residential, designations that Ore not intensity Sr residential land use signation does specify however, that prevents one rye: nation. There are other cifio'. Commissioner Former asked it there rra x.-a provi,l;an in that requires t, at resicientia1 intensity hp: si,t5c°.il4 d "'T'his designation should be broad an opposed to Wadi tno state in sore fa M a& Mr. Sangster /replied that the, Genera.! Plan statute in, 4e Government code does nqt require that density be pinpointed,but in tread can be merely a general guideline. Mr t.ive explained that the resolutionn clod it is shing a new Medium-nigh Densityes abli Use '13esignation and, as a trailer: an that, the westside of Springdale t: reet would be it should be a two-step process. One step establish the new designation "Medium High as doing two thinjs. Senior Residential Land 0 U0 5 acres located on given that designation. would he a resolution to Density ^ Senior Minutes -"1/22/86 -4- (4124d) ;tr co ne"r rent won zprnval of (Q)h3- 1 ch -b-14M. The Q would 1 uil'ling plans for the d:ot.+ r,ti.4n to r.1aced on actor a u' nsit .t ti'onu a contained on Pan 4 of THE PUBLIC HEARI NG (Ai) k i i ri ieg1 site 5-it furl tho Q t& limit tc Findings 2:!;r apr'r the e Do P'' i n r , 3 ?.TIP ` 1V: was no one present tr f t o t o r 4..1 an d the public hoar "inq was Nos e d. Co mmis s ioner Porter qu ertiont tIo ignat:ion of a density. % potatlistrx'.Ot)t of the op Mt. f saran, t- . , t it ^canii:+,1 districts . Our own aiO.ricts in the d:tf-ren+. 1%lan may be rerideutiai, out or add the Q, etc.) Commissioner Residential? aesignation? General Plan Mr. Sangster in general p LarLtinUes t:_ teconl pproval of Zo ne C. n d iew Board approval of the er recommends tha t a second W units an the s ite to 114 vdl o f t:h one rhan'7e are bh Staff Deport.. I) WAs UPRi E boot Adninistrati wht:•t or t 1fu e is a note sit,y for the State W de t Ct'1Otr th e {l that 0o Ge:n' ra l Plan sets =0 `t:: r• :t., things down into ;nine co de, Division JT,esta blishes the ,r., ral plan areas. (Example. General code would break it down to RI, P2, P Porter then aske d if there i s a designation for Senior Does the Stat e re ;wire tha t ter{ be a density Can Senior Re sidenti al be, as area designation in the irrespec tive of the densit y that is Going to apply? Attorney, roil I anning to Apply sore 3ansity guidelin e s to General an Hai Simmons, Staff, stated that in to- i psi :tint iai land use designations in the General Plan, each 't=signat.ion does specify density limzrs. There isn't anything, V,->wev'er, that pievents. on from st ahlishAg a senior residential designation. There are e d?sign.ations that arc not intensity sp"Cific. Yer^missioner Porter a ,ked if there was a provision-in the state Cod that requires that r.esi: enti:al intensity be Specified in some form. designati on should be broad i opposed to narrow. Mr. Sangster replied that, the General Plan statute . in the Government Code does not require that density :°ae pinpointed, but instead can be mgrely a general guio lin . Mr. t.ivengood explained that the renblution was doing two things. it is ehtablishr.ng a new Meriuw-hi9b Density Senior Pesidential Land tlse Designation and, as a trailer on that, the 309 acres located on the westside of Springdale Street would be given that designation, it should be a two--step process. One step would be a resolution to establish the new designation "Medium High Density -- Senior it has }e on the normal practice Minuttes - 1/22/8 6 -4- # 4124d) w;az, t .7' 1 nu, rl from h,' dan.:%3l' t"+i rti el the u z f-?"al 01 us t h :.1 AN UM esearohcl mut ,ou, of s hi ''`Izivy Phis c1oal and r econ men ene ral P lan Land Use de: ionAhun o Vollu in High tt nsit R rsideatirai be ..seated and th'o ayl lied to the subject +r,r,r,>rty. The cnly zoning whit*1'i wouidn,he card intent With this designation walla he P2 or R''''Gnnjna vjhi"i r°.ar .ineu with the SR si,ffix. Any at_tein Pt: to remo> th e R suf •3,x would then re=quire cor,currvot 5nn< ral Plan ar;9ldment for a c hi ge to a non--Senior Residential land ue de s ighation. Staff fee that this requirement will provide ample irroto Lion from future atte is to build non-Senior projects ani that it will be of valu on Area 2.1 Of this amendment , an well as,,fin future projects in other "teas. In order to i3tpleC', t the new a ;'igfati' n staff has ded Section 4.1 to t.,a.W Use rr nt. Amendrn n 65-3. This new se ct: n ad;tinistr titively reates the new rand Use designation .. ' eation of the new de?signa . ion has been adver ic ed under Negative Dedlaration No, 86-1, '1;c pprove this designation the Planning Commission will need to open - he Public Hearing on Area 4.1 of-the amendment and approve the egative* declaration. lt; land UV U if coul d qtr=l y zoning and was ltkekinq OS}:':(rr.!MEN`'a` NO, 'ZONE CHANC E NO, Ar'1. 0ANDAPY 7, i.Ejrtx W! i eta; - ;r 'rrATtVF IT DnCEM8FR 3, 19 7 , 198b meeting que design ation, ", howe !v1'U xn"t concern at P1 tensity ?esidon} gal t_e, then the applicant suffix rertnvedfrom tb`' n o Planning camni -s io on l y a S+'nior proje=ct" Sinc e tt"e/'Lend use Element Amendment and EIR s have always dresse thy possibility of a Sodium High Density land use >sigon and R: -nning , there i no need to re-process the docum _nt Wore ap ing the new Medium Higli ,'D,_nsity Senicr esidentlal -ee nlgn, tin to the subject property. There is al ed to re-open the ubl.ic Hearing on Area 2. 1, , aff has 'provid d new Resol ution 1119(c) gh Density Senior Residemt01 land use des +plication of that designation to Area 2.1, approval of rand Use. Element Amendment 75-3 this resolution. Re s id ential" and th e "'econd stop wou: be to de wha t wr .waisttut than zAF:r}eAr ,_e . t.id:'r a r ehis'?.nq and t: _ are two :.ii ft-er+=nr :-'i nian mak i ng pro ca..j wh„X t quest Aarad th i.;: r x, "of any of tho land i t state-whic h 1'ea"n rFi ('Op r ibl with t h at. rid us;a-i t e tint; .on ' If we shows Seni or x psi,dent:ial Land Use sidnati n. va n we :;how whit z4"i'li::t 1e r Pip P22,,R3 or R4) c ii1 >attible wi th it ;could it to decided which zone we put on a particular piece of property at the zoning level?, If so, it leaver,, it entirely open to the zoni ng discretion and then at the :ite that t comes for a condition al use permit there woul be a as t o wh ether there would be a de n sity bonus . Do you in doing i, in this , mutter k, staff, replied, "We bird not, considered leaving ,it C' Out it. can be done.that wa y . We considered chat a lediur hiah lrlira. iLy cue •Lgnation would be compatible with. Reciuc-arch u,nior Residential a ifix b.ut we could place just a Senior Residential vittrict in ti:e General Plan rather than tying it dr'M to a dor ity .it },r ,m pre;,l.o; to hat that fl* xibility. Commissioner Schum ach er wanted to clarify her interpretati on which fell ows ; 01f we no a land Use Aren&wont,where wp take exis ting property and change it to R2 or P3 with an SR (Senior Residential) :affix an it, in the future if that developer cannot develop that seni or housing project, its goes all the way back to square one. What will it revert, to? Staff repl i ed: "If th e developer wants come in for a general plan amendment (wh hearing and approximately a 4-W process Commissioner Schumacher felt that this wouK-1 that the Commission was look missioner Porter recumn n ted as opposed to having more appropriate, Erskine questioned why Mr. Port prior to the Senior Residential Porter replied, "To inaicite th with all residential-zrnAyl." if that is ether: Q isarry t. ha Med impact jfr:i Fra 11 : x i h AC Minutes - 1/22/56 move that two separate resolutiozz be en both coi tbinod on one. Two would wanted Medium he S nc;iu tion (4124d) MOTION WAS MADE uY PORTER, SECOND 1dr MIRJAHANGIR TO APPR'OVES ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM 4.1 13Y ADOP'T'."iu RESOLUTION 1349, WHEREAS THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT To THE LAND SE AMA ODMENT - THAT A NEW SENIOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION SE ESTA5 ISHED, AND STRIKE THE MEDIUM D 'NSITY .ca4d t' `az, rYt' skin ' 4aP' 't' 1.r C.d.Y, utur . mill rr City I;JdYnci1 Wi9uld unk+(„'Y'f.uilr+ what hies, words meart. -. at it, :;h Auld ho worded in f,'luivalr?ot and use lanquag4 cone l ,r.kinal at ttLs in t fut ure: wi,'ju'ld know what it t,'.frf!Il'tiS:isrnne: r 5ul",11I,i,` r f'Eael.s t:rlcat t.Wd'T ..ti t:rr r'!:;SYt. r r,°iiat:ions needs d, Wnc+reas a :.; :. illrir 1t4? ly'1};r7it a1 i :S2?;;i i r Cat:.;i gnat, ion i;3 heir rated An explanation ,•kii =ai to srlc-luC,)d in the re o.uti.an di° cri bioq t:htt Senior R *--"'? dent tal iise deli nation. She w -uld to : s rii r lsolLLtion mile vc r, clear, so that any atte,<tkj . to remove the SE wpuld foreo the devolo er to start over. staff wa requested. tIo prepare, i'c r ap:;prova.1 , a ssecand resulu t1'6'at 5tCp111d] :al r7S i m lj' the eri:'ut iQn o, the r-%e- ior Residential 1; 1 -;w :xt'ii,n an, tk.rr. ado that w(,r zri;; t'x iiltT:TTlr x; :,fit '"h,m now iF :1+1r.1t it :dr1 ( 7f.f , no .s o n trans fer i:.t woo i,inq f1:' ;:; ,ti,,.amendment into ti;r: rs I Chairs":an Ltvr.ngortttj, entered or the rC?cclYe t. tti resolution rttp r-t,i the concerned re idonts. Their t-;4a11:a were that seniors shoe d :E:. locked into not mia t:' than Med ium ht'-cause it wotalu allow mo re im pact to tbe .1 ION WAS MADE EY PORTER, SI COND AY MIEJAHA'NC1R TO. APPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM 4.1 BY AbQFT G _ EESOWTION 1349 WITA SENIOR DESIGNATION, WITH ADDITIONAL W _ TNG TO FE TAKEN PROX, SECTION 4.1 d.:i'r` `IHe LAND U'Sty ELEMENT 85-3 CLAR 'ZING THE OPLRATION OF THE SENIOR RESIDENTIAL AND USE .')L;SIGrATItN R THE FOLLOWING VOTE. NOES: ABS EN' Aii.S'TAI:N MOTION PAS ri Rowe, Wi.nche Kair3ahanulr" None hone None hrartacbeir,r.ivenauuod;, Erskine.Porter, Clair""4n Livengood !yLggrsted that the orxmi,, ion approach l.be fc,l,win i tems i n t'i s order r'ir `t, lock at: the conceptual plan tor the proposed a ; iwland Project for Senior: on Springdale and determine the num or of units to allow for that project and then back.into the oter items that need taken care of (Land Use F1ament 85--3, item 2.1r and Zone Change 85 -1 5), Staff rcriiridE`:d.Chairria3 .ii,vengoc'u that the Cor'.mis'sion also 'ao t c appro'e Negative Declaration 66-1: PC Minutes - 1/22/86 -6-(4124d) Commis _1:snur Erskioe quest 91 pity counc ils woul d nn it shou ld hr'. wordea someone looking at this teeth=':r feature Plannzrirt Commission,-, n wha -,eso words Meant.He fel t ui u'alant. .,no uo lc`iriga °i :" so that inure wo ,1d know what it mea nt. Commissione r Schuma cher feels that uo d frerant revol.Ut 1 describing the Swi 7r Resirdart,ial land use d+::s.i nation. She would l 0e to Pee this resolution made je ry t ear, so that any attempt to remove the SE would force the developer to start over. wre,tated. An explanation should be inclucOd in the resolution needed, whereas . Senior Resideriti.ni lane as' deoignat"ion hta3ff wa requested to prepare , for appro val, a second resolution that would address only the cria t.ion of the senior Residential land [a'"ik' designation and then add that word nq to the re s olution, exp ainine : what the new desisnatio n d aes,, and then transfer the wording from the amendment into t.he r, of tion. Chairman tiven'good, eett°„'ed for by the concerned residents. The ae locked into not more th? i Med more impact to the n=eighborhood. resolut ion preparooythat seni ors should ise it would allow MOTION WAS MADE BY RORTFP, SECOND BY MIRJABANGIR TO APPROVE HE LAND USE ELEMENT 85-3 CLARIFYING THE OPERATION OF THE SE DESIGNATION, WITU ADDITIONAL WORDING TO BE TAKEN FROM SECT I O ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM 4 .1 BY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1345 WITH SEN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE NOES ABSENT: ABSTAIN, AYES: 0 4. IOR or Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher,r.ivengood, Erskine, Porter, iM r. ja"angi r. .,)fc !none None MOTION PASSED following items in this order: for the Proposed Meadowlarid Proja determine the number of uSitp to back into the other items that ne 85-3,Item 2.1, and %one Chang; 8 Chairman Live ngood s u gges ted that tit Co r tssiort approach the rt., look at the conceptual plan r for Seniors on Springdale and flow i:or that project and then d taken care of (Land Use Element -15). Staff romindod Chairman Livengood that the Commission also had to approve Negative Declaration 86-1. Minutes - ]/SC (4124d) t,`> a1e t',sa1ge ti f S E?r r t r„r.I., stoner no 1 idesit'4 n :tionF; )oe it ";"rate oh zorl land Us p c lca ctt1CJ11. 1f wea '.c,w #S(?- io 1,.4 ;ignation, ,,,an We how Woich Itii17*'.:; tl.te i'tir4 34.':i 1* With i t : Wo11'1c : ' [ T ) t 6 - , ,c6 p:r{t 't 't31ar piece= of prup;perty ,fit.t "e t'. entirel y t o th zoning he pro P!?ct. C7rae t d?1 a con ( 3 :1 711:°t t us"':: discussion as to whether there would he any impact in doing i• . it this r?a,irt*:r nine Frank, ctafty that tlexib)1a4 but it c t°1ediu y,}(mor M,0*d -E1igh, t;'1S i Bt all -rtil'3w Dist. to a '1:'pity ff replied. "if the me in for a ge nera l pl acing and approxi mately r) "cwissic n r Schut.t4:ache t t A'[ ha that the Commission was in n0 Porter replied, To indicate that ith all resi.rential zoning." "W had oat.. cone i ilk?a i «ro j:1 on :au f 6 ng ia li it f f i xt in tbo General i..i h are . i+ t Commissicn-r chumacher rated to clarify tier interpretation whicrx fcllowss "It we do a Land,I'se A ,rrndmer , °,lhert we take existing property and change it to RZ or P3 wi tit: an SR (Senior Resideiit;1al ) suffix on it, in the future if"m nat r.",,veloper cannot develop that, senior housing project, it goeK ,'all r= t way back to square one. k What will it revert to? PC Mindtt:s - 1_`22/86 ldpc' c;> 4ri;„tc re a.Fve the SP he has to r n r:; at EwnN wo,::In l.rcl rye a pudic 4V,.m,nttt, p.ro e e,t 14? ;i he prot ection at tw o ¶tt resol ution "t; troth comb in or Ros i (a1P N 1 AME DF o wool To APPROVE 49, WHEREAS VIE DMENT TO THE utm IGNATION BE Density struck out tial i s conpatib 124d Comeissioner Porter re( auor'ted as opposed to t ,ore appropriat4 . MOTION WAS MADE BY PO, TEH, SECOttT) BY M *AHA AE MTNISTRATIVF ITEM ; I. BY AI OPTIt'G t TI PLANNING coMMIssxo*, RLCoMM.FNDs 1114Fr0.-,:.OW NG USE AMENDMENT - TT A NEW SENTGts RESIDENTIA ESTABLISHED, AND TRIi E THE MEDTDM ; :vSITY. E,skine quey14c.ged Why Mr. Porter wanted t prior to the Siinior Residential. t i d ;nt i a 1 Land 0 €'e; P2, R or P4) are :ich :tone w+,put on a 1eveI?. If sn, it leave d then at the t i:?le that ri°ii t t . 're Would be a cien i ty bonus . Do you :e. leavi ng i that y ywittl d place Ju;; t. .a r than tying i i t3 . '4 TtON WAs; ' ,r?F RY r Tv 'N(o) 7 SF{'(f BY :SCHUMACHHR TO APPROVE LAND SF: IILEMH;NT 651-3 1T1: " `;ATI'VE ri'rl,ARATION 86-1 BY THE FOLLOWING A'YF,;iv+''n ood, Erskine Porter, hang it Chat rn, in Livengoo:i asked stun# hi.ch was submitted by the staff explained that tY°e Appl c anti comvi ssioned a report on the si applicant. Soils Roport regarding the wi. Commission Livengood also clvrzstioned staff concerning the sewers in that area and the impact that this project would have on then. of 1Ee to 11 feet below orade?. Thy?t*, was also a lab test to determine the compressibility of soils between 10 feet and 17 feet to determine what kind of footings would be required. level. proposed for the subterranean garage. Testing went to a depth and that the report indicated that the water level was below the Staff state d that the Sanktseniors project and the densi would not be a problem. on y clartfication on a Preliminary ristric, lower A stra w vote was then taken to see what felt that since this is a in a senior project that it e project the 'Commission nt is requesting 146 is recommending 1,14 with wanted to allow for this site, The applic units with subterranean parking. The staf surface p arking. The majority of the Commissioners prefe residents in that area. parking, They felt that this would he red 114 units with surface he best protection for the Commissioner Rowe questioned the estimate of the intensity of use, It was explained to him that a survey was tafr.n of other senior , pprojects in the State and other states. It is estimated that only 20% of the units in a project such as this will be occupied by people. C Minutes - 1/22/86 (4124:i) A MOT-16111 WAS MALI': B? SCIiU ACCiF,td t3 - ' `3iti LBY EF+SK.NE TO APPROVE AREA :.,1, kEDESI"NATUG THit 3.09 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SPRINGDALE STREET APPROXIMATELY ThU 'EET SOUTH Of` EDINGER AVENUE FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO SPN",OR REs2OENTIAt., "Y THE FOLLOWING VOT AYES: Rowe, Winchell,Schiu Mir ?ail angLr t7( E,,; Nonr AA5EF7'T'. N0.tec+ ABSTAIN. %.n,- MOTION PASSED Chairman rivt,ngaad aske nspa Zunt chorgF: . staff's rccomr'enaatior w#.S wording t{',addec1 for condit io i3oard approval of the constru establir ,n a maxirruihi number of n of 11.4 fter ,r:<-lrity bonus. MOTION WAS MADE PY SCHUMACHER. SECON Y NCHELt, TO APPROVE ZOt,F CHANGE 85 -15 WITH ADDED CONDITIONS T E: FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES,Rowe, Winchell , Schumac r ,'\L,ivengood, Erskine, Porter, Mir-.'aangir NOES:None A'BS'ENT:None ABSTAIN:None MOTION PA FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF Z E CHANGE 65- 5, i . The proposed zone c nge is consistent with the Ge eral Plan Lan 1 Use Des, nat i as recommended for amendment h the Planriina t"nim issi The proc'osed zo change will be compatible with adj cent properties upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit for th proposed proje t The capaciti.s of the City and Cou drain sy,ste are adequate or will the propaee, increase in density a land uses .fn the era. ty water,, sewers and storm be adequate to accommodate well as all other planned The proposed increa se 'in density will not have a significant adverse impact an traffic volumes and road capacities, schocl enrollments, and recreational resoures. The character of the surrounding area is not adversely impacte not the overall intent of the general plan sacrificed. PC Minutes - 1/22186 cher, Livenqood, Erskine, porter, ie r° commendat on was on the Stitt also/recommended that t :e 'r X° to require. Design Review drawings )?or the project , and to (4124d) A MOTIt`,N WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER, Skc'ONU BY ERSKINE. TO APPROVE AREA 1, 'r:EDEST(:NA'i NG THE 3NO9 ACPE:a L .)CATER ON THE WEST SIDE Of t,IjEtlt.clt3AI,E :3TREFT' APPROXIMATELY 760 FF;E:T SOUTHOF EDINGER AV'NUE FROM GhNERAI, COMMERCIAL TO SENIOtEE RESIDENTIAL, BY THE POIe',fIVING VOTE; AYES: Rowe# Wsnchell, 5chk.m< ilf?r, Livengood , Erskine , ki LCD, Mir Ianangir N,(E" None ABSENT: Norio ABSTAIN: None OTION PASSED airman zun" change. Board approval of the construction drawings for the pro end wording be added for co,ndit:ion.; on the "Q! to require De`' Review e the staf f's recommendation rra xr_ -I'--SZ o. Staff also rec ommende , that nlish a maximum number of units of 114 after a densi nus. MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER SECOND BY WINCHELL TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 85 -15 WITH AL DED CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES. Rowe Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, NOES ; ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mirjahangir , tcone None None Porter, MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE. 85-15- 1. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan Viand Use Designation as recommended for amendment by the Planning Commission. 2. The proposed zone change will be compatible with adjacent properties upon approval of a Conditi anal Use Permit for the proposed project. The capacities of the City and County water,, sewer, and storm drain s;'stems are adequate or will be adequate to accommodate the proposers increase in density as well as all other planned land uses in the ara. The proposed increase indensity.till not have a significant ""Adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities, school enrollments, and recreational resources. The 'raeter of the surrounding area is not adversely impacted nor the overall,. intent of the general plan sacrificed. PC Min;ttes - 1/22/86 -a (412Ad ) WA'""r, 7F:AY "+,sVENC;i'?On SFCQNI By U;ib= F1LF^MENT d - 3 WI T8 NEGATIVE OFCT"APA V01F win(,-rle°11AY?'S: we, MLrjahangrr None AiISENT: None ABSTAIN: None- aVPI LiVt'rngoou asked staft for cIa ort regarding the water 1 vel staff explained that and that the report level proposed for t aced th bbt Frran ut fC to 17 feet below qr determine the compressi.bil'i to determine what kind of foot Commission Livengood also questio hat area and the impact that t Staff stated that the Sanitatiorseniors project and the densi would not be a problem. A straw vo te was then take wanted to allow for this units with subterzanean parface parkin .h- majority if the Comm parking.' They felt that residents in that, area. project that o see what size proje the com mission . The applicant is req sting 148 ng, The staff is recomm ding 114 with od, Eakins, commi. Toned a report on the site the ter level was below the to gage, Testing went to a depth CHUMACHER TO APPROVE LAND ON 86-1 BY THE FOLLOWING also a lab test to >oilI between 10 feet and 17 feet 1 uld be required. staff concerning the sewers in pr ect would have on them, eferred 114 units wit surface be the best protection for the Commissioner Rowe ques oned t I t. was explained to hi that a Projects in the State nd othe 20.a of the 'units In a project pr.op PC Minutes - 1/22/6 6 e estimate of the intensity of us survey was taken of other senior states. It is estimated that on Bich as this will be occupied by 2 trict"t1t that since this is (4124d ) iri,i <,hangPss to the Developer Agreement: =rtz eri:c [r} II C k c;i 4;dI Par t It ,I 7at'Tr Ctry a prov. p a rt a t. s a `1 riff,hundreF3 fourt een ( 114 ) Senior Ci+, ;,tViSann of Affordat,at' Urit.s * ';tl apjorova , paricipan s'a1ir"r ,S. r.iiirty-eight t36) affcatdab.lt unit;? in (76) market rate u z. sho"ld read. ..Ilar"t with City Council, tha ,iirl r*-ad,..Wit.h appropriate >4F(I t.t hui'ld a maximum of ns r*=n+.al units.., i r`°•"+a..:Witi. approprxat x rid to provi de a maximum of itior3 to the seventy-six ipant Sl.tii fr,'st'tt)li said unit'; r.,mr,,iain a means to insure, able for thirty (30) MoTICtt WA:, MA DE BY tIV `t16o0 eV MliW A,HANG,IR TO APPROVE COrSCE,FURL DEVELOPER AGREE aa3'I IN O NCEPT,AS AMENDED, AND RECOMMEND IT To THE CITY COUNCIL. FOP BY THE FOLLO WING VOTE: AYES, Rowe, 'Winched, chtamae:taer, Livengoodr Erskine, Porter, Mirlahangir NOES: Nona ASSENT: None ABSTAIN: None OTION ?AS Condltio Use Permit No. 85-6 4 is a request to add a second u to an exist single family home ,enerally located on the side of Slater"" venue,, east of Beach Boulevard. A revi site plan was submitted by ras applicant on January 22, 1986 oving the greenhouse and cle, lt the don< ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental r tions in effect at this time the subject request is categorica empt from the req uirem e nts of the California Environm enta l ty Acs T1 E PUBLIC HEARING 14 OPENED Mr.. aeno, the a icant, was present to,speak 'n supper,: of the p• jest and t answer any questions. tie stated at he has lived, in the su .bjec esidence since 1963 with his father a mother, His father, r ently passed away. He is gettin g marri e d ortly and is planni to continue living in the residence . The hou is being remo led so that the residence can be shared , allowing ivacy for boJ his mother and for himself and his new bride. Ho eub 'teed new ans, for stiff "ar renew, eliminating the greenhouse and e°. et inthe den, originally included on his plans, PC Minutes -1/22/86 (4124d) M lr;lkrtty(In i'r+ W -"r[y A lflnIi'Ln(on t,r^,`rC_'.ltk a S>tiI 'bic ti[}21 'p-r t 3 '1 rrji. t (K .,z"d [.'. 0 5 A I l,:rr. "ci t }an), and ',"'i{'il€3r wland Md., da jarin. l.ip (W cviwil'"i ',Iltr:tt Ike „1',t r i iviy >.IIYt."), Thu My and Pat* ic °i1'atttt:: t'r_1'./r` i 1 Int .+iltl 01100 as :a`'FW on; 1 . , 11a tir.t•t ri3 lr :dt A. e"UI I hi r ' 1 f " t I r i , 1.,t 05 Kn t h n approval of Zone Man=R-H5 t't t`t..t, Lttr ,1, h.;rt `,!t_- t7.._t,o r the jrr<, jec t Grua, hereinafter calle d (1u "s1 t(I'." , (,dta ,i° (ly`i - ifi EM). -his adltor.'1 ^ent is entered into f or ilw rt . "a(`i; of iar .:C,Kl ,,.w1'.t: and nit' for specul ation in land. he dl:vS-lrAj`r I M I rJt" ttt{' II. j;1;C i;uant °(' thiv aqu °t`w nt , and the fu.l f 1 men11 of the #ut ( =nt, nttarinaIh host Wrtonts of tla C ity of litlrltinoLon Beach and fli t, I t 9 r r h ; a , t t + ;,°w t : s i t ;Nr'1 . t Y ? r i t i t , !+ '.i tdr,nt s, and in in accord wi th t In pulil y purr 1';e'It gri d i`t trS]!;;3rt3E) o applicable Moral, State and Iue a 1 laws (toad rx"lui ryrnr nl s rAw wh ich Lim , project has been undertaken. 13. The nro)&'et rise The project area is located in t1?e City at Huntinq&n Beach, California,. the exact bounclir ,les of which •.ro s;t;ef:i.f icai l y dcu.c.rrbed in City counck Ordin ance No. , which iiii .€.rupeitt i s ineario atvd herin by reference and that purli "` c'ncuIrIntab anq t he site as delineated un attachment No. I which i s WO a ;,Gu-t 1150,1 V OF lUt)tl.lrut-df Suae " i l"a i9 I'l-r the '['h(e lr'l.tl," Il e,#' it rpt 1j1,,, 11l.utt i tloM ii-h, ,a i n t . 2. 'I'llo 1a;tl I- i c i jL A. Tot tl au,,1;r,!Iarti t:.i H ,;,w Me 0 ty -q,,wf,.,,it ,,tt .iciFant. s;irralI ," ,al: 131(1 of 4! (1 'S I:n i t:., tirlvvrlr -.-'rt i nd si x (1 t)61 market rate unit s. Tho se additional units wi .in pit v' ?- , 4 ar a manner c in i stt'IDt. with affor dable pa yment criteria der prov'.idr . a maximum t foi try four (4 4) a f ford ble unit s in addit ion to t(7erlSifl (I f`1111'111rl t - ) .;+ ni<n ':'it isk>ns rental tar 1. With gar+t.t pr i<ate City aqu1zt,:a-l,port is ip ant-. sh a l l be allo wed to that said units remain ,a f f ord ab e for . specified period of time establ i shed by the time I i-i is set forth i n the propos ed fina n cing or when the areas vacancy f actor • ce"ds Q1 wh i hover is soo ner. C. Senior CRAM .?llarartmt rrts 2. Participant Mill esU bl i sh ,a 'means to inur e, with City Coun cil, from the latu't° estimated Oranne Mlanty *sedian income 'firtaar e as re; ,by the Cviit.or for Economic P enoruch. rata Chapman Collette will remain Senior Citizens apartm ents t'or ;he economic and physical life With appropriate City approval, partie •int shall covenant tha The jot I i,.'iv.arat° iA .z ,.It tn,;V i ,Ashy ,I`ti,trl t1ndor the Liss 6 11 Vat If' I i k `t -tll 34 .idly he f7,in'i irIp.idnt ha 1 I f:{1175!. 1-ti1'.^1. in .'f I I Ih'ANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BE ACH AMENDING SENIOR RBSID1 TIAL DE' L,0PMT T'ON RFC PROPERTY FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT TO QUALIFIED M.tDiU i-HIGH DENSITY RI SWEN'IAL DISTRICT, COMBINED WITH I,LY LOCATE D WZST Or SPRINGDALE S TREET, H OF EDINGE1 AVENUE (ZONE CASE NO. 85-15) WHEREAS, pursuant SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING 0 tington Seach Planning Commies where eparate public hearings ea ;HTINGTON EEACH CRDINANCZ. CODE BY AMENDING e to Planning and Zoning Law, the and Huntington Beach City Council ative to Zone Case No. 85-15 neidered all information due consideration of the lanning Commiss4 on and all i1, the City Council finds that scent with the general Man, nci1 of the City of r antingtou bodies have caref,i11y c indi.ngs and r idersce presen ch zone chang beari ngs, and a. f to oimenda. tions of the e Eeachi does ordain as fo Edin id City Chunr, and consi the City Cou lows SECTION 1 . The followin Led we st of Springdale Street ler Avenue is hereby changed ,*ict" to (Q)R3-SR, "Qi:ali fied °ict combined with Senior Res The East 4,00 acres o quarter of the Northe South, Range 11 West, City of Huntington Be California, as per ma miscellaneous Maps, i said County, described real property,generally approximately 760 feet south of rom RS, "Office Professional Medium--High Density Residential drzntial Development"; e South half of the Northeast quarter of Section 21, Township 5 in the Rancho La Bolse Chica, the ch,,Cour , of Orange, State of recorder . in Book 51, Page 13 of the office of the County Recorder of EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following conditions. feet there of. Subject (a) Any future project approved for this parcel,, of land shall be subject to review by the City of Huntington Beach besi.gn Review Board prior to issuance of permits. N (b) The maximum number of dwelling units permissible to be constructed on the site after the granting of a density bonus shall be 114. SEC1'IO 2. Prior to any deve property owner and the city shall approved by the City Attorney as m pursuant to Government Code ovisions for the total number units allowed by density titer into a developer agreement r c65e65, et, seq. which shall inciule of units and continued affordability as. ION Services Director shall be it on the property, the hereby directed to amend Section 9061, District Map 24 (See.tional District tap 21 5-11) to reflect Zone Case No. 85-15, described in section 1 hereof, A copy of said district map, ar amended hereby, is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk, SEC'TIO'N 4 This ordinance 'all after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by th, Huntington Beach at a regular nee day of 1965, effect thirty days City Council of the City ing thereof held or. the Mayor ,ATTEST: ity Cler. EWEII AND APP OA AS Xity A y INTTIAT4O i.ty tlnastrator rector o eve opnentFServices C. ITEMS FOP PUaLIC HEARING, C-I SAttiw' USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 85--3/ENVIRQNME.N" AL, IMPACT that a 114 unit project is a good proposal for the site and is neigh borhood concerns regarding privacy aid a'sthetic s. Staff feels adjustment to meet code we feel that it adequately addresses the The applicant has also revised the site plan for the 114 unit project as recommended by staff. Though it does still need some ighborhood and the office proj^Cts would have greater impacts. prepart'J..-i comparative analysis of bulk, populationt vehicle trips, and -ru, rion coats for the alternative development. ;t.a°f nas =.'zewed these comparative analysis and feels that it is re?asE ;nar: , curate. The bulk and population analysis indic tes that +t> higher density senior apartment projects are very similar to the R2 projects in terms of potential Impacts on the surrounding REPORT NO. 85-2/ZONE CHANGE NO. A 1 irafr : Meadowland LTD At the Dec nr er 3, 1985 Planning Commission meeting, Sand Use Element Amendment 85-3/zone Change 85-15 was continued to January 7, 1986 so that renderings of how alternative types of development would appear could be prepared. The applicant has prepared renderings for a development of 48 four'-plexes, a development of 45 townhomes, and a 100,000 square foot office. The applicant has also December 2, 1985. Review agency and public comments, as well as No. 85-2. The EIR was posted for a 45-day review period ending Amendment document which also server ,a Environmental Impact Report continuing to recommend approval. Environmental documentation for Area 2;1 may be found in the ff responses, will constitute the » 1 EIR when transmitted to ie City Council , These items are inco .,porated in the addendum and appendix portions of the report. Zone Change No. 85-15 is also Medium-High density. Staff firther recommended that Zone Charge covered ay Staff referred the Commissioners to Resolution 1349H for approval of 85-15 be approved for a chance of zone to Qualified Medium High change ordinance be amended to include a maximum unit count of114 sity Residential,. The "Q" would require Design Review Board pproval of the project. Staff further recommended that the zone unitrs also under the ,"°Q". THE PUBI i' ii :'AFt*NC AS ,are NNtveau, principal on the project, spoke in favor of thf- project, He addressed problems on traffic, size, privacy, problems, and underground parking. Alternative options for comparison were discussed. Jeanie Tager, fnerald Cove principal,spoke in favor hoaxing prof c She pointed out that many seniors because of lack of,,space at Emerald rove and pointed community needs more`enior projects. Richard Short, hcneowner° p adjacent property, $ project. He had a list of 8 homeowners also ag and said that they were avail le to speak if n problems of the homeowners whi included high e privacy. He feels that a soil s vey needs tgv'be zoning limit set. Lance Berry spoke should be low dens of a senior ere t urned away cuY' that our ke(against the At the project ed. He listed the city, traffic, and completed and a atnst the Meadowla )td project. Said the zoning :y. Elizabeth Short, homeowner , spoke eg supported a senior project but felthbeneficial to the neig boring reside Katherine Berry, resident, said but was agai nst the proposed p1 Mike Pagers, Council on community has a real nefinancing, This projec seniors in this area, shopping and churches, Todd Olson, cesident, be affordable to most $700 per month z st brie project. S,ie at thI project was not tse X as in favo of a senior projectthis site, Aging,/-/Spoke in favor of to project. our ad fo r/ housing for seniors with private t is .ffordable and is a goo\start for Its location is near medical facilities, near an has a good transportation system nearby, estioned whether this projects would really enlurs with rents approximated at, $525 to Hr_van-Cad questi ed why R5 was being changed. Why is the Commission allow' 9 this change? Dan Neveau re' erated that intensity is the issue and that senior projects are ess' intense. This is a privately funded project not a federally nded project There were no other persons to speak for or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Livengood pointed out that what the Commission had to consider here was an existing R5 zoning which would allow a building with a 10 foot setback, with approximately 100,000 square feet and a height of 35. feet, The applicant is asking for a 148 unit senior complex and staff is recommending 114 units, He asked members of the Commission for their comments, PC Minutes - 1/7/86 -4- (40514) THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Dan Neveau, principal on the proje project . He addressed problems on problem.., and undercround parking. comparison were discussed. spoke in favor of the fic, size, privacy, site Alternative options for pie, aver, Emerald Cove principal , spoke in favor of a senior community needs more senior projects housing project. She pointed out that many seniors were turned away because of lack of apace at Emerald Cove and pointed out that our zoning limit set. privacy . He feels that a soil survey needs to be completed, and a Richard Short , homeowner on adjacent property, spoke against the project. He had a l ist of 3$ homeowners also against the project and said that they were available to speak if needed. He listed the problems of the hoineownt'rs .hich includedhigh density , traffic, and i.ance Berry, spoke against the Meadowland project. Sai snoulo ne low density. Flizabeth Short, homeowner, spoke ageins beneficial to the neighboring residents. supported a se.rior project but felt that t he zoning he project. She is project was not Catherine Berry, resident, said she was in favor but was against thi: proposed plan at this site. seniors in this area. Its iccation is near medical facilities, neat shopping and churches, and has a good transportation system nearby: financing. This project is affordable and is a good start for a senior . project Mike Rogers, COune.iL on Aging, spoke in favor of the project. Our community has a real need for housing for seniors with private Todd Olson, resident, questioned whether this projects would be affordable tc most seniors with rents approximated at $525 $700 per month. y .-Van-Cao questioned why R5 was being -,hanged. Why is the mmission allowing this change? Dan Nevea u reiterated that intensi ty is the issue and that senior projects are less intense. This is a privately funded project not a federally funded project. There were no Other persons. to speak for or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Livengood pointed out that what the Commission had to consider here was an existing Pty zoning which would allow a building with a 10 foot setback, with ..pproximatela' 100,000 square feet and a height of 35 feet . The applicant is asking for a 148 unit senior complex and staff is recommending 114 units. He asked members of the Commission for their comments. PC Ninutes 1/7/86 -4- (4051d r FOR fiEARr;C C-1 LANE USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 855-3/E NVIRONMENTAL8 -AwGE l*tO85-2/z ONNe CHAN .T NO. cant: Meadowland LTD At: the ,December 3, 1985 Planning commission meeting, La Use Element Amendment 85. 3/zone Change 85-15 was continued o January 7, 1986 sc that renderings of how' alternative types of de elopment would ap} ar could be prer*ared. The applicant has pr pared renderings', or a deyelopr..ent of 48 1 our- is c s, a d elopment of 45 townhomes,a a 100,000 square foot office. The plicant has also prepared a com ative analysis of bull:, populati n, vehicle trips, and construction tests for the alternative Cleve pment, staff has reviewed t e comparative analysi rfasonably accurate, T bulk and populati that the higher density sii+ t. the R2 projects in terms,,of potential f, neighborhood and the Offi ce ojects wou The applicant has also revised t project as recommended by staff.adju,tment to meet code we feel th neighborhood concerns regarding pr that a 114 unit projec t is a good ntinuing to recommend appro val, ENVIRONMFNTAL S TUS: Environmental documentatiAmendment document which No. 85-2. The EIR Was po December 2, 1985. Review staff responses, 'will con the City Council. These appendix portions. of the covered by EIR 85-2. ai 0 and feel s that itanalysis indicates ve are very simila the aurroundi reater impacts. plan. for the 114 unit g h it does still need some adequately addresses the and arsthetics. Staff feels for the site and is n f Area 2.1 may found iso serves as Environ ental' to for a 45-day revie per a ncy and public comnen, Lute the Final EXR when ems are incorporated in th eport. Zone Change Non 85- in the Impact Report cad ending as well as ansmitted to addendum and is also, Staff referred the Comm*ssioners to Resolution 1349E for approval of l ediutn -high density. aff further recommended that Zone Change 85-15 be approved for change of zone to Qualified MediumBigh Densit y Residential. The "t " would require Design Review Board approval of the proj t. Staff further recommended that the zone change ordinance be mended to include a maximunn unit count of 114 unitrs also under t e Q". Staff ;suggested tht action be taken in the following order: ",1R 8 ,anse Flew-at Amendment 85-3 #Resolution 134 ;cr change 85-15 PC Minutes -177/86 partment p o Sid) i Commissioner W i nchell stated that she felt the Commission was dealing with an existing iand Use Designation which allows office professional. The applicant is requesting high density and the not Just density with the l east amount of impacts. space is not needed and that the commission must look at intensity needs of the City for more senior housing commissioner ScAumacher feels that the General Plan needs to be flexible. The City needs more senior housing. Additional office staff is recommending medium high density. The General Plan is more binding than just making a zone change and it says nothing about seniors or number of unite. This project is residen,iel versus office profesional . What best. benefits the City? The City needs a compromise. A project like this needs to be economically feasible for a developer without lining his pockets. we need a reaao"able project for the adjacent neighbors and one that also satisfies the conditioned so that it would require only senior housing. issioner Erskine feels that senior housing is needed and another office project is not, He asked if the General Plan could be intrusion in the adjacent neighborhood. the project could be si+caate on the parcel to minimize the Mediu Density and ac4 the Senior Residential suffix. He felt that Godfrey, staff, stated that such mechanisms have never been unities. The zoning could be conditioned. orporated in this City but he has seen it done in other Commissioner PorteL : recommended that we designate this project Commissioner ?Eirjahangir stated that be would commercial He felt the question to be c number of units to be allowed; landscaping, compromise of fewer units with surface parking and better condition and the impact of subterranean parking, He would prefer a feet's that it would be the beat for the neighborhood, He is not in favor of subterranean parking. He is tcjocerned about the soils pport residential sidered was the Commissioner Livengood agrees with a senior residential project. He There were no other comments from the Commissioners, irman Livengood asked that they take action first on the BIR. There were , somequestions concerning some statements in the EIR: Page 8 to read: Development of site for office professional uses would be consistent with existing R5 zoning. The site could accommodate a lGO,QOO square foot office building with a maximum of 35 foot height and 3 stories. The staff report regarding asbestos, which is a concern on thisproject, should be incorporated into the 5x.R. PC Minutes - 1/7/15 405ld) Ernv.ronmental i,i; r:, 1t-es,1 - Earth. Will the proposal resu in unstable earth F:.:)nditions or changes In geclor4icai structure,,-z. The answer should be l;ated as nayhe. Explanations Yes and result in approximat is this a correct st comfortable with thi A MOTION WAS MADE BY I VIRONMENTAL IMPACT Fcr,LOW1*NG VOTE: Maybe on the E11+ -. Item l1: The propo s al will ly 200 ad ditirnal people residing in the area. temeut based on the proceedings. Staff was figure. EPS,FINE AND SECOND By MIFJ' HANGIR TO APPROVE REPORT NO. 85-'e WITH AMENDMENTS BY THE AYES. Winche .l, Schumacher , 4 ivengood, Erskine, Porter, Mir)ahangir NNOES: None ABSENT: Rowe ABSTAIN: one MOTION PASSED Chairman Ltvengood then called for a discuss ion on the Land Use Element Amendment and the Zone Change, commissioner Port,;e r asked staff if the plan for 114 unit s had been reviewed and would i t fit on this parcel, Staff stater that they had done a preliminar n check and that ct can be made was recommended that the General. Plan be changed to a Medium. :ri Cit^ Residential designation, and that the unit count could ')e made higher with a density bonus for senior housir.g and affordablehousing. A discussion ensued as to whether the General Plan could be changed. What type of use do we want on this property.. Could ',here be conditions set on the Land Use Designationt, there were some minor problems but that the prod workable. Mr. Sangster, City Attorney, s be conditioned but there were could be made each year. Staff feels that Q-A3-SP is built that would include on very carefully in the zone ly ated that the Land Use Element could imits as to how many times changes change. (4051d) .u.:-aa': '+.1d*".'.i+:31 1 `75:i.,w.: f.„! ...;.d r::, -It the l„„°tirdS S1+. W';`... ?uuc with o e x ;in Land t3sc Jes. ation which allows off t is :ec.orrien ing medium high density, The Genera-A I11an ;. essional. The applicant is requesting nigh dCOsit± artri tr,e than j ust making a zone change and it sayr notttirtr aiac., seniors. or number sffi `f profesional vnprtmi.se, A Pro for a developer wi project for the ad needs of the City tlex;ble. The City need.3 r.e;cre .e i housing, Additjonal i s not reed :d and that the C eumission must low at in iv t ; ust Jeri. ity with the least :i `ounr. of impacts, units. This project is r'esieential verses What best benetits the City? City re:r-'d d fea:IZt;let like this, noeos to be economically lining his pockets. We need a. reasonable ighbors and one that also satisfies the en or housing { ,an is,ai her Scchum.acher feels that the General plan needs J1 1`: sCnor Ersk ire; feels that scnier housing is needed and an ccsndi ri oned so t,t at it would re uire onl y "enior housing. ice project is not. he asked i f woe Genetal Plan scold he eject coul d be situat ed n 't4;e parce l to minimize Density and add the Sen i Residential suffix, oner Porter recommend b4 that we designate this ies, The zoning could be c ditiorned, ted in this Cityut h has Wean it done in other Godfrey, staff;, `atxated that such m, ohanisms have never been ion in the adjacent ne.Ohborh,Qod. ccm;.missioner Mir over commercial. number of units feels 'hat it woul be the best for the neiq:hbot qod, He i ahangirEated that h Be fell' the question o be allowed. Commisninner Livend agrees with a s enior residential jpr, favor of subterradean parking. He is concerned 'abgnt: the soils condition and t};re impact of subterranean parking, tie wood prefer a compromise of fewer units with surface parking and potter landscaping.,," There were no other comments Pion the Commissioners.` Chai.rman."Livengood asked that they take action first on the EIR. There were some questions concerning some statements in the FIR; Page 8 to read.Developr'ent of site for office professional use, would be consistent with existin ? RS zoning. The site could accommodate a IOO,IOt0 square foot office building with a maximum, 35 foot height and 3 stories; The staff report regarding asbestos, which is a cnn;!ern on this project, should be incorporated into the, BIR, PC Minutes - l/7/d6 (4051d) A MOTION WAS MATE BY FPS 'LAND USE r: (.i':[t NT AMENDEE y v, F. AND SECOND BY MIRJAF ANOIP TO APPROVE NO.a5-3 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF TO AY1:ES: Schunacher, Er ass n , Mir jahangir NOFS: Winchel l ,Livengood, Porter ABSENT: Rowe AF BTAIN; none MOTION FA:LEF7 A, t•".C? TIC N SFAS :1ADE BY dlt: ;E?M.L A D SECOND BY PORTER TO APPHOVF, LA*-'D US E ELEMENT AMENDMENT N. 85-3 WITH LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANCED TO EF D UM DENSITY RESID4,7 IAL BY T14E FOLLOWING VOTE. AzF'k; W rcJ el nni,yLi engood, Port+er Erskine, .fir jal am i AP ENT: Rowe Ai'W-rAIN N,01 staff was directed to tape t,hLs portion of the meeting so that Commissioner Rowe could review it before the next meeting. A MOTION MADE BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY MI'PJABANGII TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO TH E JANUARY 22, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BY THE FOL; OWING VOTE: AYES, winchel.l, Schumacher,tivengood, Porter, Erskine, MOTION FAILS This item was automatically continuced to the next regular me a date agreed upon by he commission. Mir lahani NOES. None ABSENT: Rowe ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED 0-q SIGN CODE AMENDMENT NO. 84-11 A licant' Cit of Huntington Beach , on November ,;9, 1985, the Planning commission opened the public hearing on the"'ppoposed s ign code amendment and cone,item until Janua ry ", 19 At the study sessi o wit Tr cernber 10, 1985, it was determined that t'Ftis,. item sh,gu :,d'e-continued until Match 4, in order for more ti ie -9 4rk on the code amendment, Win order to avoi lcing any wall s> that conform to the existing Sign code n ciforming due to size, eta is wU ling to modify the draft nance so that there is no change 'em. the regulations; that is ne 1.5 to 1.0 ratio will remain as is. CIT Y BEACHfel 2000 MA1 ; TREE t CALTFOR iA 92643 OFFICE OF Tai CITY CLERK t l.. rrr' 1 par", ;.'ent"e'iJ:"..Ut? `,ult,7 tloa,a. r-*'"6' zl, "t:;«' 1.cUflC.: „' k 'i' C jt `1t7nt"irn cr T3 .*1^t. "'. ?. ,._ ^c' u!it , nnt.7rt ht ;f lonct-r3',y No.'mt:.>r ?.fi r.1°3 L`11'It',1f?G!'4:. inn t;.o717C1i 21, 1 `utTon f4 t,,d9 'rn1 aw I 'onn 17'hnrlgt ` rf. 95 - dj -nd ". n';f'i F° (gat. "In . !jentllrxrkn ')f""ax'rmi- ? I you hat'0 ar - qt rc Tama,} Aa':.in, tlnveert;[nnit, Cc .riIo3 x"11 H(4t1;1'1X3, :T.i ;r,traytt f,-ilt 1Telephane, 774-536.5227) r^t irlo Lr.var i.nq Wa s Si,`t"k: ed. i 11 t he iap i a Of l1r h °.,an''e r i,4'ta1,+ c %'w moiifiedregardingg o o !iruyt .:, 1 Zj0 n be ..ubn t hrraa .l'a ,l t On . W ON : uwni 'trte with #L_.ion ' Use Permit .- t<.;. 85-1s. A `' a i l un WLS MADE BY ER LD £CivA.. USE PERMIT, MMIS ON MF`ETIUG 13Y•- too i tii,lny. ACc ,^'.:J'D iss:ion op nt Ws: >o f t, 'r'1XTJchoil, la°.`W-.i;'lsyr, i, V;r}v-( ., brnki;nei. VOW - AFSENT:NBSTAIN: J arr .r C-3 'AND ULF ; L ..EL': AMENDSL2+'i` ";a' c r:.. i'i'i: i• .1 ` 'kL IMP A lician ; Meadowlana I. Tj on Icavenk;erw 19, 1985, tho Planning Coobearing on Land Use Element 85-3 i?.r"a Report $5-2/Zorft Change 65-1.5 it order continued the hearing to December , 19 T t is I T 11 195 PLANNIN G t publirr 2.1)/Environm ental impact December 2 , 1185, expiration of the 45-d the til e since the November 19 ub,1in he acditional aspects of Laid Use E1errent 8-Environmental Impact Peport 85-2 in addition to Area 2.1, staff h ordinances would he submitted to 3,0985 for eleven Administrativ changes intended to establish co r review period. In staff has researched Area 2.1) and indicated that resolutions and e Planning Co rrn,iz icon on necer .::,er: and zoning, During preparation of th ma (Areas 3.1-3.11) and zon' c;r ey bottveen the General plan zone ;,hanges staff determined that there are a number of s ignificant Which should be further discus sed by t pa regarding these areas ing Commission prior an, staff has withdrawn Administrative items 3.1-3.11 from Land Use Element Amendment 85-3. it is staff is suggestion that these items he brought back to the Planning Commission in early 1986 as a separate discussion item prior to actual ptocessingf ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: to processing of zone changes. For this COVkA, "0 by F: P 1J; Environmental documentation fox :. .,,1 may be found in the Amendment document which also serves as Environmental Impact Report No, 85-2 . The FIR way posted for a 45-day review period ending D cumber 2,. 1985, .i<ovs/iew agency and public comments, Lays well as as, staff re: vonson, ni1¢ yelinstiture Sho final CIR when Yti transmitted to U he Ci t v Counei x W so Wa s }r r` 1i corpora ted it the addendum and .i r ndj ;art i fl• - I he i"f'{">oyr l 'owo c -axi n Nov 85-15is also t:.C 0-c take public testimony and or action pending the Alan Peven? qln6tv 4U00 -0 ht''r'r:Ln Blair ,: Q:j:,1 o:ti c,', .?f Dean Al f L ch zone ;iz'inue _:ta "N q [ cau . e it wa s Z"n+, Sufi) e n a..r 5.,,.ony afnA, zone Chan e e;;t re4:ciii LouisO Vortiytt : t:+ i^a it; ohaoge commenting that any pri vacy. R .ciiarc Short s poke change expressi ng c Tracy Berry .pok+i change comment ing t traffic this projtc crossing the street William Berry poke i change. Mr . Ho Van Cao :;poke zone change. Tod OhIsan spoke change. Cynthia Doe ; ,=iktt in development. There being no to ,The Commission d propos ed zone ohs residents WHO e l iv S th e archot . `ct had any in €p sit on to #-nt.ial onkdrrlsnt an! !ono $+'k rtl, ror L and horhood war; kf kweu amendment and .ta.v and high dk,nsity. oc scd amendment and zone ;t do wil l no .onc er have t he i tutor d amendment and zone a..ur,n+ j wt :t estos plant. C ^r - . r:nU=t and zone <,uc?:s in d i concerned that the :mungern4. r as far as walxtng and dinent and zone is d azemdment and ant and gone Ad sect or Citizen '. w;=MIQ;, rt;; Yli hodring was closed, s d tL „4,.kv zoning ann the Impact of the rvnrri,s:4Wn", Porter : mnenteo that the had faith O p t t.. this wo u ld remain R. The Commission discussed the don: ivy ,opo. ed A r the senior citizeproject stating that it was t o hm sh, adding that l ower densities ma be economically viable, t».C. December 3 d The i.'.7+,;iit;..-i:iieln fev ewr.?uh t p. =s#' ik rnqueut for udt:''-it ifnnal i n f f rnat i r t regarding the sale of alcohol, and t, conceptual site plan be Subwittk 1 ? Isv ".ancitional use Permit No. 85-14. A MO TION r11A:t"rt. 1.tt6> Ii 1 p !NZ't T5 .,NAL t'9SFr PERM.' T NO. Z< x' „_; COMMISSION MEETING BY THE F00yl% V nV AY ES: Rowe , % n did Ll, f.t"!'_,„ .a " . Mirjahangir, NOES; Non, ABSENT : None AB$TASta< Uoro MOTIO! PASSED REPORT No. 85-2/10NE tnAnn t' Apj3l Ctta7t Mt;cl rW afl L y) i„I;nvi til.`d continuing t request a 7rr_w tadifteo s1 on -•n' ois submitted with in QDKINui, 17, 19 81 i taA13 A' ING MENTA L !MP AC T On November 14, 198% the Plam n a i:;r. ssi cm c pened the public hearing on Lane' Use t.lement 85µ3 tArt : .l)r Emvironmental Impact: Report 85-2/Z one Change 85 -1 5 in cr;ie,r` to tak e p ublic testimony a n,,icontinue the hear ins to Decembe r 3, 85 for action pending the December 2, 19 85) expira Linn 000 0/0 -day i 18 review period. In t:he:tizr -e since the November 19 ,urlir : hearing , staff has resea,rchet3 additional aspects of ,Land Use E merit: 85 -3 (Area z.U and Environmental Impact Report 8..« In addition to Area 2 .1, st ~afii` hay in d icated tha t trcn ol.ut i ons and ordinances would be submit:te to t.;e Planning Commission on December 3, 1985 for eleven Adninist ativ & Items (Are as 3.1-3.l1 ) and ten'-' changes intended to estabi sh dons rcucyr be:wt .un the General Plan and zoning . During preps anon of the zon e changes staff determined that there area number 16f signitin ant issue s r e gardi n g these areas which shrub he further discusseu ox,,the Planninrl C+ mnission +rior to processing of zone _ hanger . For this reason , sta.t. has withdrawn Administrative Items 1 .1-3.11 f t rr, 'r and Us e ElenAent . Ame ?: merit 85-3. It is staff 's rugger ion that these items he brought back to the Planning Commission in early 1986 as a see a.rat n di scus s ion item prior to actual pr cessi:ng. ENVIRONMENTAL S' TUS* Environmental document it it Amendment d anent which s: no. Sri--2, he `1: eras peas December , 1985 , evie staff r e ponsr: , y p r e :n'; the Ct t CG111nt 'r t. 1 5P SO L fo,nd in the o s ervov as Environ ;enta1 , Impact Report s for a 4,t-day review pet'iod ending aL<a.:i "ad public ronmcntsr as well as *:s vl.c.Final F::R when transmitted to are 16i-. ir'pur at -c in the addendum and 4l d`i..,one 4°1lan c;,, to. 85-15 ial s o+'! Commissioner r I e ti ew , .. . i i i s ,Iovu t o ^ni pl ai) Commissioner Fe iL `"" au c < =str . nn .. `er ti; ;'0n with a lower b Chai rman Livengoad ruj L,tC a ' . ; :" l v for t it plans, for alternative s of 15 , 03, and P w . A .7100 WAS MADF AT PSE70 ALL USE ELEMENT AVEt:DM1 f MAONF. CHA K E NO. THE FOLLOWING VOTF: n£ AYES: Row e , Winch -'11, •, Pwat Mrt:.)ahar it NOES: N Cie ABSENT -: None ABSTAIN % 1 000 MOTION PASSED C-4 CODF AM NL?".Dt INT N'0,5-I The P1ai ing Co lsr;i.On continua fir t.'r; Nove mber Q, 196S, in ordcr to allow in that it a°i , its the adair iota? -1w fi CONTINUE LAND x,K'. IMPAC T REPORT NO. 7, i`"`` P ALTERNATIVES BY Er s kine, Porter L m from tJ rage ovet, dwelling unit 0q.1 th a naxinurr o:>_ r it,: in addition , the C?D wissaon wan.ta any r' + ronc''+ to restriction f 'Mu ted Cm t h e of `Sig : i ?. :'t: . revised prepare d by Pao City, l•,t rrvy r;.,qi~ "ityr it st:t"k:he d. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ',-'' The proposed project y categori.caily exempt from the California Envi lattmental Quali y Act. THE PUBLIC HEAP WAS OPENED There being 0 stivony',, the publi boa A MOTIO WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECOND by E 11xL F A: EN1 NT' NO, 85-17 AND P "C JMMEND ADOPTION aY ThP TEE FOLLOWING VOTt;. AYES, Rowe, Winchel.l, Schumacher, i;v ngood, Mir jahangir NOES, None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN None MOTION PASSED ing of Warified rcent to equi.ring a deed ordinance, rovisions of TO APPROVE CODE CITY COUNCIL BY skine,, Port P.C. December 3, 1985 -7 (3895d) U c1;1; OF Ahi#""I jy'ti;,. A v ai i'. v UYT 'om ..:lMe!1 . Van ers 1 Upf ARI 1 Plan La T coos W" with the is DT :ev W on ff #ka 4„tl n F !' _ i _ i y;.." y j "L. w requ e st !' U , .. i ntenoec . to ew i_ . n r i tw - t e: ist r .a zoning aK4 s ww, , c i Area 2. and the City-initl atr, Admit.istrap v 1 Item;,. i ce staff zone change intendeC to 04 t teu tc the Department Vat monument slan. ` ha;i l be subj Development I.51 00 removed of i.be monument sign. CA-+En .&f +VIRO NME':NTAL. W. 85,15 E lki a+.;dre9':,", one cod arienome it= Pral Plan and 3 addresses linty eatcd as yet ad4ertised the elevel this pub lic hearing is Change No, 85-15. r EIR 85-2 will not expire unt li Decembar 2, 1985 '-the Pl:anrdng Commission cannot take actin on any portion of the n r nKent until December 3, 1985, The Novern i r 19,111 pub l if h ,a iv :is intended only for the Planning Pon still p r e p ar ing ca and ;i:1s r the Adir;.1KStrat,c've item resS onl y Are a 2..i ana A Hither, the 45-lay puSic review '°,'.'" O Commission to revir-w ar,rJ ref r... will be prepared to make a [ifs ';. Staff will also have the Withand advartisgd for action on .aer PUL LlC hEPRINC WAa$ uuPENED com rrrttj on Area 2.1 so that theyarrcan it On December 3, 1985. Al con current zone cnanges prepared moor 3, 1985, Dean Albright Of the Huntinjen . " h Mira, tal Board spoke in oppasiLion to the pr'ooo ec1 WOW U"7` ant za'a.ie c an9 . Mary Rona C ..'gated that. Allen L1egenhardt, applicant crop s ar:nior c.xt'izen project, spoke in support: of the propcsed amemd,r L.a1 zo6v change and his aroposal for an affordaole housing ,r.,3; ct for senior citizens. Suellen Cro sno spox fn cr; posit qA to toe proposed amendment and zone change spoke i :a,.a, poit ion tapth e ,!Sq.pas,:; rf ..kamer 'ft ana one change. vember, We area for 25 years and d l Mi'a rc< Cormissi n e L schamauheK a s ked pra j t'ct .IF :c"Lta.4' Flal w;,iflhiOki.- of s °ti fL submittal of a 4:aJriCksi: zone change, . ii No rA _;F u rame nt a nd iny was closed. Nn.€« nrir rl 1114 + !.' r"xuzr s ttai": #l „1"cty Ai f filing a Con (?issloaer " Ersk'in .: a5y =t r.1 7 ±,o t.?.'_ `233 `: work the neighborhood. Co?°ir.i ;. io' r w7.Trs.; .`r)l commented Y'. I i.. aCe a needs t-'? realize that the w sn +c.L".ii Plan Ama1.#4,.r* ',er.n . .,; and specific devel=opment prOt1Pn: G ili h .art : !&-. Chairman a'rent;`od =uc e;aten 00 done r; vlti3.a'r"S9-J' zoning in ter.m of heights, . r w; _. t .c. Commi ssioner ''rckin4 agreed with ,t'a_c i;rl"grin L mn ,;_s:c;a: reconmtndl.n continuance. The Caimir ion a k=.:'o about tilt AQ. :q;trlrj: zun :r Winche11 stated that the E,TR should adre ss qQ 18 ondi t.i on . Hal S-i.rrn rx of staff, stated that staff was sti11 ,,'recea.vin 5cr,rgents. A 21OTT'GN WAS MADE BY ERz& UE" AND SFC&+ND WY SCJWMA CMER TO CONTINUE LAND USE .ELEMENT AN: tDMPIx NO. Q-1 (ARFA 2 . 1 )`ENV PONMENTAL IMPACT A PORT NO. 85--2 /ZONE WANK NO. 5-IS T 'hE T7 C ,ERER 3, 1185 PLANNING COMMISSION h F`ETI 0 SY TEE r" L ,NG 'JOTFt AYES; Rower wpiichel1, Schon ac;nr:r.. M.ivtngc'od ; Er':ac i ne 'x Porter N1 ahahgC NOES: None ,e ASSENT: None,,t° ABSTAIN. NOW TION PAS C-16 COD', AMENDMENT NO, S' V. .15-63 An ieanta City of Hunt., A revue t to increase the regaired :arxing for senior .residential projects developed pursuant to the .SR suffix. THE J5LIC -BEAR INC WAS OPENED There being no testimony,the p;mi i n huacU4 was closed. P.C. November 19, 1985 -20- Richard Short, zone change. There Lein i no furtl%pr 4om. scion-r . r .^a Y r ,skecwi.y M:lr> kpro<e t specif rt c tJr.'t ,^., _C'zQn kt: Co requires theI simrons of staff sutmittal of a conc . rtua2 pl,:in at th e time of filing a zone change, Commissioner Erskine sir the neighborhood, Ccnrissio ner Winc r.eli r_oamented th realize tha t the Gt:ne.ral Plan An,' development problems will hetr_: d: s Chair man Livengood sugg-st k d a ~ far`irsv zoning in terms of heighta, Commissioner Ersk ine agfoerO continuance stated that staff was still receiv'i.i ccmments that theEIR should adress soils conditions. Hal Simmons of staff n LIvenr?ood recommending The Commission asked acout t he E-9 - Commiss ioner Winchell ,stated PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BY THE; FOLLOWING 70'E. - REPORT NO. 85-2/LONE CHANGE NO, 85-15 TO THE DECEMBER 3, 1985 LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO, 85-.: AREA 2.1)/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT A MOTION WAS MADE BY ERi.SINE AND SE COND BY,SCHL': ACHER To CONTINUE AYES: Rowe; Winchell Hit jahangir NOES: robe ABSENT.: None ABSTAIN: None 'MOTION PASSED Schumacher,a good, Erskine, Porter, -.,C-,16* CODE AMENDMENT No. 85 --22/NEGATIVE DEC ARATION NO, 85-63 -lieant; City of Huntington Bead A request to in ease the required parking for senior residential projects devel ope? p.rsuant t the -SR suffix. THE.P UBLIT HEAR I NC WAS OP There being no test i mony , thepurili-Qcaring was closed. P.C. November.19,1985 -2fi-(3885d) t Za1i ty !."F` ., Brac h ? i By :,art al l_y filling a our-c qt , d _, ,r.d, for t`t` zrtrt A"U. i n to active indiv i duals ov r 60 y require any form of board and r' titcni oVe !a. w nt.7, nrlto and even greater future i+c=,' for and only rented ar a o age who do not re facility, located in a portion of the My where t ht3.3; e :1 pro jec.ted 1rru jeOt:s , ? i; at , ,. excellent location for this cial center with restaurants store, Wks, shops, but churches and Medical off development of a project no curr ent or The site is in an r hutt_ ,ng a corrmer- 4a tip. It jC,°pry C C.I.rme, a p r ug stops, and a r ai-hy park, ces. The amendment will allow which will ge nera te less traff i c and noise to ah tying s.int cunt of a proje ;nviro-n:ne.nt For 4 4; an i l y h{ r.c s than + 7glop- iorv a the quality of living of 1'un inuturt Beach. 2 7 , 1 This 10ttOr is t •u t3"r: :'7r"i', "1. luM :t' Mi W , f1I in "1cq# nhar dt f caro ice Davies an W n 'vevo stilt t n t'it,! 3.3.tt all necessary forms For the property locate d 161 1 1 Spring al o. mA t Wn PQ firth. C:TI 1. orf i 4 . to the City '.zaLe_d -t their developmentt.t7 fluntli7cs tas3 Beach "i!'i2.i or t°a115ity W fow nw , r c not 4.01 amon-T i%o , t, o :.J. tent, in 1r" P VA -h, l'e?1 i1t .y .i_ O.v gQ, Wh ?. ¶ I :, YA 111w .4:rL:{ houst quarte r , 0 i.rrr 21, T`.c ! ip :ut-h, Ranle in An `tl 51, i', 1 =? (? U ' 9 ' Y f L'i f"y ou"r Iwr of ,3_I'c- Count` i__^; , W:! the city ts'r F3untingtx_n wal if-rnia, as pot map recorded s Maim . in the office of the G;,(Ino reet WrO f. Said is also ,.ni s Ps: _. 1. me c ± that r:-, r.t,.'2in Parcel At3 r'or, s t dr 1 r 17,!969, 1,, Par col Map No. 11565 in Book 2j, r'ac e 11 ; ,..a , in t h e Of Ii e of the County -'TANT k.f !ir P_1 ELM !1 A 1-.I )P i'I R N yIC .T lSi.l' V;1,S AGit:'.:'1, ENT t let; t n Owc:'r".a .`2fi.?ni:of1Cltief- of parties;! Wii:2f;I! SU;?t.aS.s!!3M . °`? Zr ." . °a] 'MM rnunicap al COrp'orzitior) 't, of QaWfornia. rYt: k F . 'dns . " it - e i un the fa u -75X'1C€s r.,titre T';)-) <:':`S;II 'r . 1Y3u'la34 ..v 4.a,) fy d'f i., f3 tF1_!`.cti Weil c AnC'!t el del'.". '.i [3.;k1'1;.". - t t?i`' ' C•f.;S;I {:'x!t4 r '.r1.", ;tv':.:". m . ;s6,=h y1: iNRL-11 fv eq uitable in ter; I.,"±It " 5m. 0465 1v and regulations esti:Ais,ur.g7 r131 il.19 r.l. . a 'i....of dpv' ii?pmf n c al f +i5. .7-_,. `' J Nur 'w r a1 [ C l[:uider an rm .nt a airy `ri r ?,'mc+,Ten t a l l Sr ,. .k" , wen tape, Mtn w:C!'i tnw 4.^ -. Ia11r ` i e"4i" y ''l:enti wF:t eta, W'r A19 m-,' «. t;crh?!(CZ tiw 'I'A!.L`lrai in .E; r :yrf'i.1.uantt At- :!!a'hi-t 'Ir v! n1tvi£' a pt' t,X}[#'3tt - i>±>p,-rrwF,f tc in .i. 3'zt r- ,CFiix '' }-'r `laf 1;. - «,. r. .r...f'1 a r'-S ti:• s.};?' $;'.`' T xSC1iL Ct,tt_ a#,- for f lrt ed' tb:+_l 4im.'tf3 rqt t'?'kFi«._ :i'_''"''*?'. t; 'E"• w _;' ."r .»i_ ,:x.+. 6 <-' n't. }'.L R ..ti"' t .irrCt t "Imo..%`` t One r!,r Inca+rW1 : fit. r`a.:. , ?J(i .1 p.ari +,4e'° 'rx'",lybeO in pr'n't'"' n:; ir`}a ,u'ft Cf tr1h."3{eh refer m ye It maOe frrr f urthf If,C t *i tli ti, (See Note uJJ The C IUV!,'1,7CYrn,. n Fl(l^« ..he 1 ill; Jr'w; -"C=' A rs: C.^i1 Ce ihi7t7*.:suc as,O-t1.it f(r71'C,wAthcr`mmon area impmvemertt )', Inc dEr'.'C'ipP Cttf r: [ r ferrp('; kf; m r:sA .'a"f;#?371EPr `t is the tnf- -;A,11. a,71 : -e sF1Lt °JI ' .?f3 t.es ` ' ati:! Inoy kte d('! in t2he d1p;)I'rv devpje,1pLr.m nt pNn w ;i, L fi.7! review and approval 1l'vttLI(r1, `"„'4'i loll £+i tey ;amend V a t*'rsitit. ',n th e J•P ;r:,,, •iltt'iir. ti Yr^' 41 ii„<nt! pr s cute 1 e t}l:S', ?1"'"t'€.ni :f *N .1"r,rttint Sa["". *t.7C U4l iC 't f K"Iii till' t o Wi thin y r!% P ..h In h^ the tat! a,S£r$ of- f!tr•,Prop!'r"' the sl,,oli P man V Pr::p ',t.''r,y.i'. Q h an tat':. -t.`i . i 7 Ce t3. ; i,`1t;,, The nn,,dm nn in ''' ,:l" 6m .li ` in Ei that .`l1„'-'r k4E..: i.lt ner ;ICI ?.• W. :';g:`<.e ,:x S+ i. Via,. ''qr. isr-• 'T .': T he 4will nnut)le Tty w h ich herornc .i part of a My M&& A .`s1 tfrr th Pain al We tiur_ until :I 4r1, UC1.a 1 " 5r"xt+: 3r,, • tel f'i CY C7fiS "UC1;'O l • :'t'int u,tt.i :it n o. A c hangr!* modi- emanptm, r.ion "„ 11 -1 s 1"t11 rI ;xw tr'i", 'DwIF" o1j r,t1i Ptnd ;;1111 ts,)l(' trx•;A E""r1Cti' its [.i:!t."._"^., jrlrr -.!, (.5, ="T1 ptr i i., . f.rr .;•rt i3'1v 'Y!.fr lC''.- : C`!} 11fYY.lJl t4 for 04m or .#dlStT1F' f,% C,FImwe for "";my i 'rti'3r WWI Cf ;x 1'i a4ttf'"a'li r' xa7r rSt Dert;M e:f4 x9tYg Y7., -.r'rn 4r -'4,.";,<`" ft i ! 't. .Paw r't r ,.. ^f v. r.r't rprsrc#{1 i1°l'r '.'f .7c P `)pt "t„'.' Vr:er fJr tl' o e a'C'f1t^!4e T. ^i7na'"''Ytl"...^'At`"6fi, 'Yi' rit, k^4;blflo4°+,ce or )ther per'-'7n toting on 15 tiehftlf 'Moth rW' t o it e 7 CS ft.ti'. "".3pt"!caner gjtr os tG fto l cl `oiI defend (. en'v dt17[!tt-fCinp !."`". 'h:°..f.nr}..2't7"e4!i t.s frnIr t1[!t4C1is fordara-r,gif.°-au%m± i!C`r i?C'(1411Twoyt,Quip no or on l' r'+:'rxet t),:' '-iP"t!11t{S' in, •rtf•.!ia,; ?Arn up wS „r sta.'!,"' 'I tF `S? ( }e..r r.,n. !if?S'Kr .• 1 t') `b'i!'1ri w-r .1f1 2 P,'. :tn',je t. hra? r'ft? Ow n er On pur'l -1:C 'tt1I. the flpvni!41 7f fern,. 'rnteiot naw -ier. caner : Iml`-7x . - twit :af`r' AC. W .r aM t,._..1. :IF,r; muj on r,t "ids a. .lti f°.)f *1d,4">"rlrkros sUf- .':1r_!'-it. ;!l.ti s. w:«ral't„' !n this W,l#'.1'.her Jr not trlr in"Ur- a e ,^-Urynt Y' ttfdl f' 'in t;l. vWr -Allow tjt1e mn ,'to prn.eO t. P', -'_tert Owner n 90il"•1"[`.\r .1.m y,, s,Ica F 01=n!0 '"' , T i. w` 'Ce pro v e h rn'her t i°^rkpen- gxn.. liz' -in.- nnf".y ux e r,ct to ; fi"',t^ ti y r. ur 4ne ;° not WAY t'.,m 1,,.11f(*tfA 4('F4't Y to '#r?i person ?rid +u ')tdt t t ", .-ire I m t for emom _r.tr"Ir''-.hit ,rr '.;Y'p!!t 1 :il+f] - "1 "<?-] I. ."if)`•`.:}!1C'nip.'+.v- ''oree: "4'i+: )t finer .'54': .., .1° _nr.a,m 4 1..,,,ti.`I` .)i. 1_! l+°fi• Ir[9n 6`1r -rid' f` x to ',.tto l7 rlL `. 4"6'.`. 7. t i1f ..U " C!Uh C at :. fl;iC C t liltiiW insu4::nnev. Property sc#rfhn^7 :.+:t'.'L m the of s E}f "l n! riA`ti'rn. C,ta;rn or (I(? -r. tkol "t trit:t or by re icon of any eantt fie . h JiC 1's4rn^1`'' owner shoo ?namtf n in- T'i .` reason of 5rencb or e1 m for breach of can- Why or n:Nger,' eontr:tetua l llOilit on any eontruct enterei into ` Prop rt:' Ow ner or his C i1t::actor. subcontractor, agent or employee. 15, (Optional) Evi 1t?n e of iri:uraneo- Property Owner shall furnish {:t -encv) concurrently with the execution of t,'is Agree? nent xkisfrae ere evil k*ace of the insurance required and evii.eriee that the ^,arrier is requiread to give the (,Agency) at ;east 10 days prior wri ten notice of the crneellation or rvduetio n in coverage of a policy. ejassifiealion, reS`,."ie ti rSs. (it" dievelr "r+rrroat of rea .1 in addition to aoninG vA; w-ng ;Fie +fie rE-';tri ^tion; sha ll n we ,,r.,vern t h e us:' of the property :-; r'f ttie proper;^.yrfi 1irri 'O'n-c `nufif e) Maximum: height for cc'ieh t f the M±:xil urn qW..e for cacti of the prop. <=! The f dl- wing %se.•-e~ ic', ;declicei `hut 2 ii:; ,in ilte.-it purposes specified. follow kcm.ec bui,r irig is, ed btIi)dkC °.f r;lid shiz11 be ma'oe for VIII ye, ref rence can be made to an Exhibit,) i;. (Opti;)nttll Sun-z quo?nt a`retionnons of (Include any Couditons, terms, r-WCulrernvnt"; .:r .su..sc ucnt 154',"et'onar 4iS,'t, 3r s Permitted ."`t' bJll ,«») 14. . mrrwf t f'" 'v r'- 1See Note 'I er s, a n o rive 5i?t forth *r thr,)ui;h 'andit Ful`'S1ltnent of the requirement of sue tr,e tomr-is Jf those -asyrernien;s any shall in no niectlation or expira tion ,f the agreement. ces 1t` " no-"!'tnp'r ` gr t' C irler.r "'I .ti . Pronerty owner OS qtr other "igreemen n l 'e rut:licTrnproverSe";ms.reic '5: 'e'nwuerate).. r irc"v+oin„ cuc ? ill#':3a< ,;a,iVerrilt*n facilities and sere e ent . inctu :e'd heroirr,.I ^. til 1t)It way be affected b;.' the terrrireation ;^i r r; Pf' et if ^t«nmei t on lem: a e• _a< r,:alsOro. The ruic5, regulatianE and olicies governing permitted uses of the Property, the cens tx .of the real pro-' Improvener;t end construction tari;iarrs and ;pfe lexatsoir applicable to tev eloim4?.`:t o t.tC' ;'e 'r r are t-1J``? rules. regui `itm' ns "vid officia ; - JIIeies in form? at' the tie 0 cO,,clition ni tr:i 't n e:Sig Exh ibi t - or) the following: airier u3 This gag"CC'iTt£tiT}t Axis not ;rrt vr:'T'tt th • in "Ubsequf•c1t 'Setinns S1ppflcu is to Vie rt' i1 prC)f7477t «' fr'ur. Ht'+:4iimc ", now kPi w,_ t "9' ti +tilCifs Ilnfi pt7%es 'rv}itPii.,c not en r114't Ntith thr n nr»le rr L.;'j«tttt+'1n5 irs{ 'fC',jin;trC I Pat hnrititr.,yir iperty +i'; forth in f:Aij?itt atz'i^t1e?. i'il, ri.x''i" e nc,n (ws nct prevent the (:' enev) °d[I'T L46i:! 3t or C'tai °tf?r)t."tt«'> Flj) C Vtnk ``t A L.I; Ct 1t1+Rt F:£'Yc ['3itt3+ n-! > C7joet app114'tt 1 Ti " on the bits',`; of PN i. -r3i„ c,r '1CK Cri?ti, r£'t„tirt:.r3Ti ,rin y <'tit' s. (See Note 7) }.Ft y q r r j ert:n:t r'1' A `y,ra i It i('Tr +e +?KOr ..'t!ftit h•• o nee ; .. 'rs•t (7iI t'""NTI tb- '.;!''T£.;t:r ,. .'oo, a*iT-.,, 1 <t`",It<-. - - - rry rary) f \4rtatto, ty th e,Prrip4 rt. Owner :.c x'+nr w ri r'1 srfr r ws q r nor A', rr'ek.eni e 'nt.£'stll" C: t.' f r .RITs! r ,t 'r3i t -? 4V9i ,Lit {*'> "he "rrw.fyr`rTF Ownf'r iip;,<es to A'"11i41 W•1<*h evvi ye ' is F",v,oI NO e ': '."4 p'tifliK e the Ap: i] L.l,'1 in tiir7 v.Nor{wr.(' '"f .:C"t'"3t7C rrt V retplir". l:"i'Icne ?f ocC't'utr tcon;pltllnee may i'-`lt'lilde r rhU: k not Ye ne°:5;f i$'F xrz.. ~ ^, :'EC C`t{ WrI r+,"4r.,r?. ar,rr . ^,i i "m om:c +'.3,1!!,rr Vrt'Yi'lan er 'r l.n'7rrr,:RC'i 1_1 ri'c°7' " I,a'. .f t*ilT7£+..,ir sr<,i r rr <"{4.C: 1[", Phr'n*ra t;ii 1> f M# T i t ;? t°fitCT £1 . to C 'ii v 1t!' :A 1C .Wt;ti Fioch lt,$ ?tii nge M t he appli- `•"'t +l+;: !n'Tl£?r'?lor plan. +!JC'inc %FS t !RWn yr ")iti:ding rrigulutions adopted thy' K V WE.<rte t 9A F!io utt{'r nr Ct'T?CT3t; tht r e s. regult;:.1 '.."ail= ar :TX_"rir i,-'s governing p4 rt rotted 'lh:p<qf o e 111X. '.<_f r?C. iK1 "43 t t,r?r='t'+. lint 9fc 00r"•-F••l10`i(01 :1tinrja 5 nnlt soecif ioatiOtlS. 21 Wctn °,'r :YUt: r ?trt '1Anvr i, in ';t..lint-''.or Agwerfl= upon or o1&rr of is foj Njr r ovS -ilts.o rar,il(iilk ;il7 e, '4-0' Unn '." . lt+:'.n rit r t'4''.e or fct ril0vd LIy Prop- er:C Owner to We . '4iet is false or pr S„+< to e,i.S•c.Crr•en ffJit' in at1L r+: t4 ll3t respect ', hen it was -1, 10: QA a .Among and dA errj!iot ion by the {A rgeney matte following aPeriodiC revie w under tree #roeecure prooi'lec for in c+'t. Code section 63866.I that upon the basis of S'Lbstantirol evidence the Prolpert'% Owner Las not eampliod in good faith with 304 one tar more or the folJr-'ing terms or c! n(I'tirn of this ri eeme it: J7 mn ,r,`(' Upon !'J'.rrt*C?ti r+'nc"= ";f Mn t I, +';1t •3' aE"rittii: the may terminate or modlf" this :;gre'merit in kit"^Ci^C;f1ft^. k' w';"+3 tre Rat'".C*F C, Sire tirlopted by the ltd 1"SL"'''_ (or Cit.' noes not naive any claim of raefeet in pert'orrnarioe by property owner tF`pi ;• : if fin R}errotiie *'vie tht, ioc'ai %V'e,-it'V! rings ' t propose to motif;' °,r terminate the ag"eer ent. "p ')";t;.+9ncP 5- ti: not ustt'1*oq+isR of a 1'-:lure of athirc pers t11t Al xprE Sai re is iitti->ti, *r,":Eis ii •-r "k_'fr iC1t1:F1tioui of the l"r:rntl F3l tp if the Brame is in wr•itr:iF;' ant : iigned')y the prociertti' owners, wl'l3xi on 'uflieitm ` to terminate the mere:in&'1lt Hintz t henrnig or, tiff" 'r.1"k'r S"ik4it :ft,i4 t "e . urt! :. nt That tit;[?nt7:'r of S lnw ,yr:itber rrv ills en»ti t iotiv itti making per:orinance 'iv' the ir+pitcent unprofittinie or more t.iffieslt or more expomtve does not excuse the perforrnrnce or the nhlii tiorl n k, the pr ipert'.y ownvr. il} 'Non-zae rf'r` tint e :miia ' e C r^;.trt*L Cyf x't1nn Ct is +"r'4't?i' by act .of' (uc or an t't1a""r e1'o .•E,rr eh `_'1 the {r C' "t1©C. de Ail ccth'eT fm(-,'i4?s i!;11W it egiitty Wittier ar e riot otherwise pr'ovid'ed for in the ur reement or in c:ti,'s "vt'nulfttion` governing de:"eioprrtent agreeme nts are aveitao to the parties to p urswt' in the event there is a n}rfac t. Dilrnar'ns upon tvrmirlation, In no cat',.,W, shall Pr,)pttrt; be entitled to ages against city upon terminatrnn of this agreement; 26. .Attornevs fees and costs. If legal acetion by either party is brought because of breach of this Agreement or to enforce a prc;vision of this Agreement, the prevailing party is, entitled to reaso'iable attorneys fees and court costs, 3.2' 27, Notices. All notte'x*s requirer: or prm!k for under this Agreement 5hrall be in 61 ittng and, delivered its w,-ton o sent `)y e'rtified mail, postagrs pr,paid» Notice required to be gtv n to ( p ri 1 ihlptii )v ndi!r&.Tsseti ' s foll ows, 'i^*e rer ulr t ti, be z=.rn to prrmperty C % ner Ainll. a ldr(*ssed as follows: ltitlat5 of *n'tra'iiet :t ., ,-rt, eitirtnerius 'tr'n 'i';)ez angular anelaet?5 ?ne piursl: the rnsiseul!ene gender includes'the fe (Wane:"'Stirll it rnan('atorv, 'Inioy ,,, eraii live, t.at if sipart t i ttits Agreement ;a head to +e invriil the rema{nder of the Agr nn''nt is not offertac. it + lE i^+'a!z no-v' ?'nn ''ne me- !nf this \qr. '(!mint :t'I%-i' ",.Tt3ilgatinn's -1rc ioan; \ party akff ' (317einv'o t,r,d ")y g vin ` notice in writing to the other ,heref?"t r 9}r "rf.-ee AWN n (iiTM*"ten", '(ne LC(k(llnt .rte i tihe' new-,tcdreS5, ri1F :i" t t mii'0 +eo !,N 'rt was ,1q4 c rnen , ma; ne: Mended by mutant ;sent the pf,vti F i+ wIn th r r`-IC`edu res for adapt;on of an agreement, Durntinn of A :*ef,- iowi, h is sigreement shaU exmire on 19 '1'f`";C5; W RECIF this :Av-eernrit has Meer executed ti the parties on the ove'! as to forms ,Agency) Pest { i 'r-lsr-D& t lt,(n"-"i' :ri ;x)`,)f'f ,.,1". is i :,t Artt+, r roor .o,rent •--ixpi:?lp t nt t"`sW n t,t on! . 'r,l` )4ttl-ir'}, ok ^ai& Cet: We.""SlR, (h& tlit4.lt.)lt}ej'x ;;aid lc+w li i 1 f! -, V ON N t t.;rnt ale WOW I l y irrimi and ad- ilr`;tt rt:l loC'.9t ty in 29 jifl i tlit't ,inlis by t he nr'ange `,,until tlf7u,inq Airt "; itF, r lal i.+`MY! MOW -iriur i tnnt+u: a' wn ilett vo d $11,800 annually and oninr voupir income eon nlr'T1, t ,•_c'-d,c 1 1 3 ,500 annually , rnia 1.ifi d e,e n ifrs who bold a et[k rt l i 'lc_',',t1 E " of t l i" bil ity only pay a maximum =:l 301 of L l o r s•rm h ,l y ,rar01i110 tn.vi:ud rent ., the renairider supple- wonted tby t°hc ttt`t_r;tr in. R 1985 rent level ouil i i` iod gift' t %in to oorAm in a new building where tenants pay utilities are: ntinlia-M6.00, Mr-5512W, 2br--$6O LOOt, on a. monthly t t-"is, ACoUrdinn to John 1'.9rtit)uch, r'C.P1)re:4ol t'ative of, the nranoe t"rattstit.} 1!0,.l1>a no ."jolt 1.>ri t,y^, Mogo levo'lS will be increased up to 9 1121 'air 1986. ltrmnbttt'}i , t;tt,' a that the re a re a' ur rxrtit,ly 1,460 seniors in the program. of f he, a, lfl?; t•:ii no t "..Q or ho I.. ox rome di f'f ie dlit y find ing units it qual ified rent lelvels. He al so states that yr;a'ny ven.lor s do .not 'iut,ly for tlto i`7rrittra m due to the ;`act of knowli &1tio of the ri nt.al market f:ri cFaC?di n+1 t iua icioil Iuk,rols. a r`; r }R l r';C2 R 3 , R}: fEtE-1 iki A! RI Area of Concern , EXISTING ZONING huntington beach planning division t7E ,_ s. ui' R( HS r ' R3 t CF-Rtp-- EXISTING ZON MR, N12. NW 1A, NW. 1/4, SE's 22, rss, 2IlW 145-O9 r * EO1tV E h" _ e !et <t A6 ! AVENUE' r $1 AC FN?5+2F 5.55 AC. w 146-51 ICHIPPER-f4, LANE Aji