Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1971050 - Supporting Documents..inn. ,.. . Minutes H B Board of Zon g Adjustments. W,ednesday,,September l 1971, Page No. There being no further conunen..t, the hear in g was closed . held Board discussion was A:MOTION WAS MADE BY PAL IN AND SECONDED BY LOVEJOY TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NOT ' 71-61 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: there is no need for a 10 ft. X 10 ft. corner cutoff The abutting property h as a side -on entry garage there-ore ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES:'Lovejoy, Lipps, Palau NOES: None ABSENT : None THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 71-59 .A licant:_ J ose h Ca occiama To permit the canti- lever of a second story of a three-unit apartment building to withir 3 :ft. of the rear property. line in lieu. of the requirs.. ,il ft. setback. The subject property is located on the eas : ;ide of Delaware Avenue, 27 ft. south. of Memphis Street in the R2 Two Family Residence District. opened to the audience. The hearing was Mr. Capoccianta addresse d the Board and explained his request. It was .noted by the Acting Secretary that the Planning Department had been i nstructed to process this type of application. There being no further A MOTION WAS MADE BY PAL IN 'AND SECONDED BY' LIPPS TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 71-59' FOR THE FOLLOWING . REASONS 1, A precedent has been set fox thi type of construction, The Planning Commission has prepared a code amendment that could allow this type of construction. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Love joy ,, ,ippNOES: None ABSENT: NoneTHEOT ION CARRIED . ''_A WTIREVIMNTTIVtAESIE] Appli cant: ..erner Aldag, To allow `a restaurant in are existing build'ing. The subject property is locatod at 218 Main Street in the C3 General Business DIsttict, in the town lot area, I ,Minutes: ki. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments +Fedner day, Septe tber 1 1 71 Page Noy 3 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION! NO, 71-6 Applicant: Mrs. Edward R. Sig To pea t an 18 in. fiberg ass extension to an existing 6 ft, concrete block wall within the side. yard in. lieu of the maximum 6 ft. height requirement. The subject property is located at 17162 WUdrose Lane in the -R1 Single Family Residence District. audience, Mrs. Simon addressed the Board house was built at 'a higher ground elevation and her privacy and explained the request. She stated that the adjacent was infringed upon. The Acting Secretary suggested perhaps the problem could be alleviated with landscaping. Mrs. Simon felt this would not The possibility of raising the fence height to 6 ft. measured from the higher property was discussed, the wall as she felt it was unsightly. She concurred with adding similar masonry material to achieve the desired height firs. McDonald, adjacent neighbor, addressed the Board, opposing the existing height extension to on exis ting wall. the hearing was c1rased. Board discussion was held.. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND FORTHE FOLLOWING REASONS : SECONDED BY LOVEJOY TO DENY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 71-60 1. The . applicant has not shown hardship. The extension is unsightly and not of the ,City. ROLL CALL MOTE : ABSENT: None NOES None AYES: Lovejoy, Lipps THE MOTION CARRIED CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION A l.icant: Wm ., James Palm NO. 71-61 Richardson in the best interests To permit the cons tru tibn of a 6 ft. redwood> fenc e to the sidewalk era rear property line in lieu of the required 1C ft . corner cutof f. The subject y is located at 9361 Clottdhaven Dr in the RlSinglepropert Family Residence District, audience . The hear ing was opened to the There being no further comment. The- hearing wasopened to the Mr. Richardson, applicant, addressed the Board and explained the request stating that there were 48 ft. between his proposed fence and the driveway of the adjacent neighbor, eliminating the need for a corner cutoff. 9/l/71 BIA, Minutes B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday,September 1:,,1971 Page "No a 5 tine .oara ana Mr. Aidag.applicant,addressed The Acting Secretary reviewed with the applicant the proposed plans- for. this area. Entrance and cir culation into the restaurant were discussed with a view to the projected plans for the area. Mrs Aldng stated he was aware of the plans and could see no problem. The property line was discussed and a possible overhang for the front of the restaurant, Board discussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PAL IN AND SECONDED BY LOVEJOY TO APPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 71-50WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS 1.Off-street parking facilities. shall. conform to Article 979 Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination . of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. 3,. All applicable City Ordinances, shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Lovejoy, Lips, Palm NOES: None ABSENT: None .THE MOTION CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 71-51 Applicant: Ka oshi Shoda To permit the construction of a 9500 sq. ft. industrial building. The subject property is located on the south side of Research Drive at Commerce Lane in the Ml-A Limited Manufacturing District. Mr. George Lusk and Mr ..Sam .Dixson, representing the applicant, addressed the Board a explained the. request. It was noted by the Acting d Secretary that it would be preferable to have a zero setback. The s.pp,l i canzt was agreeable to this e Dr i.veway widths and curb cuts were discussed.; Board discussion was held, A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY LIPPS TO APPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW'NO. 71-53:1 WITH THE FOLLOWING .CONDITIONS; 1.The plot plan received August 30, 397. shall be the approved layout. 2.Research Drive. shall b City standards at the Improvements shall inc street lights 'fire hy extens i ores : Water supply , shall b water system. e dedicated and fully improved to time each parcel is developed. lude street trees, street signs, drants,, sewer and water main through the City, of Huntington Beach' s 9/1/71 - BZA ------ - Minutes H» E. Board ,of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday,, September ]., 11971 Page No 6 Sewage disposal shall be through the Ci ty of Huntington, Beach's sewage system The_ water, sewer,. and fire hydrant system shall, be approved: by the. Department of Public, Works and Fire Department. The property shall participate ire the local drainage asse5ament district, 9 City prior to issuance of buildi ng permits, the Department of Public Works shall b submitted to the Soil reports. as required by the Building Department and, All utilities shall be installed underground.. ,off -street parking facili ties shall conform to Article 979, 10. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 11, All appli cable City Ordinances shall be complied with. A masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property line. The height of said wall shall be such that the top will be six (6) feet above the highest ground surface within twenty (20) feet of the common property 1 ROLL CALL . VOTE AYES: Lovejoy , Lipps, NOES: None AB SENT None THE NOTION CARRIED. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS