Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1971075 - Supporting Documentsfactor as to use "the „ m ning port os Mr. usk stated that the use would be manufacturing of letters and numbers for signs. the hearing was closed. Ther e being no further comment, Board discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALIN AND SECONDED BY MCFARLAND TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 71-96 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The masonry wall on the front property line and the parking shall be as shown on the approved plot plan received November 10, 1971. 2. There shall not be doors or windows at the rear of the building with the exception of personnel exit door with a self closure. 3. All applicable City ordinances shall be complied with. AND FOR THE REASONS: 1. The applicant is the owner of the abutting property to which this zero side yard is proposed and has agreed to setting the structure back at least 30 ft. or at zero on common with subject property. 2. It affords much better utilization of the property. 3. The Board has approved similar requests in the past where the property owner agrees to provide at least 30 ft. setback on opposite property line. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, Palia, McFarland NOES : None THE MOTION CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 71- 75 A licant: Norman L. Worthy To permit an antique shop to be conducted in the southeast 1/4 of ground level floor of the Worthy Apartment Building . The subject property is located at 513 Walnut Avenue in the C3 General Business District. There was no one present to represent the applicant. -3-11/24/72 - BZA Minutes : H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, November 24, 1971 Page No. 4 followed. Board discussion A MOTION WAS MADE BY PALI AND SECONDED BY SPENCER TO APPROVE ADMINISTRATIRVE REVIEW NO. 71-75 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Arti cle 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. 2. All applicable codes and ordinances for this type of operation shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Palm., Spencer NOES: McFarland THE MOTION CARRIED. MINORITY REPORT: Chairman McFarland stated his reasons for a nay vote were that no driveway as shown to the parking spaces indicated on the plans and the plot plan is not of sufficient clarity. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 71-77 Applicant: Church En ineer.ng Co. To permit a sales office and model, home complex with subdivision directional sign in the R1 Single Family Residence District. The subject property is located on the west side of Goidenwest Street, approximately 1600 ft. north of Edinger Avenue. George Putnam, representing th3 developer, and Lawrence McDermott, representing the applicant, addressed the Board and explained the request. followed. Board discussion A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND AND SECONDED BY PALIN TO APPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO . 71-77 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. Section 9730.25.4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Spencer, Patin , McFarland NOES: None THE MOTION CAkRIED. DIVISION OF LAND-:NO a I cCra dken. Inc.A 1a .a :t G .