HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972119 - Supporting DocumentsH
'..'-EXEMPTION DECLARATION FORM
PPtgJEgT NUMBER: F.D. 72-38 DATE: November 21, 1.972
PR ECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION:four unit a artment house
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS:209 13 h Street
PROJECT CENSUS TRACT (if known);NA
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Environmental Review Board
In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding
implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
(specifically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code), the
B.I.R. Review Committee has reviewed the Interim Short Form Environ-
mental Impact Report material submitted in request for Exemption
Declaration status for the above described project and hereby
recommends: (check one)
E
That the Interim Short Form E nvironmental Impact Report submitted is
insufficie nt to facilitate a decision as to the environmental signi-
ficance of this project and the project sponsor is'therefore
requested to resubmit a more thoro ;ugh:''Environmental Short Form
covering the following information
That the proposed project may have a significant effect on the
environment and has not been covered adequately in a previously
approved Short Form Environmental Impact Report. Exem tion Declara-
tion status therefore cannot be ranted for this ro ect an an
Environmenta m act tud is t ere y re uire to e su mitte to
this department an the City shall prepare an E.I.R. prior to the
project's approval. The significant environmental impacts which may
result from this project include--but may not be limited to--the
following:
U
That the proposed project cannot , or will not , hare a significant
effect on the environment . Exem tion Declaration Status is there-
fore ranted for. this project an t e su mittal of an Environmental
Im act 'tatement is thereb not necessar
That even though the. proposed project may have asignificant effect
on the environment, the project is ,a lesser included part of. another
project;!for which an Environmental Impact Report has previously been
prepared, provided that the project and E.I.R. was approved and
c,Dvers the specific environmental impactsof the lesser project ; (In
tais case, the previous project and statement should he noted:
DATE
F ,0
and are in compliance with c odes provisions.
Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, December 13, 1972
Page 3
3. Administrative Review No,, 72-121 to become' null and void if
4.ity amends development standards applicable to this area.
4. Administrative Review No. 72-121 will become subject to
development standards in effect at time building permits
are issued.`
AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW "NO. 72-126,
Applicant: L. D. Zehndq.r
Administrative Review No...,72-126 is a request to permit the con-
struction of 6 un,ajt pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code
on property located on the 'Vest side of 16th street approximately
80 ft, south of' Olive Avenue in the R4 High Density Residerl" ial
District.
Mr. L. D, Zehnder, applicant, was present.
ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-126
WAS APPROVED St..3.JzCT TO THE APPLICANT CcMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE
CITY CODES, f TT?7LLOWING VOTE:
AYES : L Pi i is ,, Spencer
NOES: K.
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 7.2-118
Applicant: Joe Shaffer
Administrative Review No. 72-118 is a request-to permit the
construction of a four unit apartment pursuant,to S. 9231.6
of the Ordinance Code on property located on the, west side
of 7th Street approximately 80 ft. north of Olive Street in
the R4 High Density Residential District.
Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant , was present.
Jim Palin stated that a floor plan layout was, requested by the
Planning. Department and they have been submitted and reviewed
VOTE:
ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO., 72-118
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING'WITH ALL APPLICABLE
CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE. CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING
AYES: Lipps, Pa1.in, Spencer
NOES: None
ABSENT None
A licant: Joe Shaffer
DMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO.
Jim Palin suggested that Administrative Revi ew Nos . 72-118,
7.2-120 and 72-131 all be discussed at the same time.
2-119,
Administrative Review No. 72-119 'is_a request to permit the con -
struction of a four unit apartment unit in the R5 High Density
Residential District on property located on the west side oZ 13th
Street approximately 130 ft. north of Walnut Avenue in the R5 High
i)ensity Residential li:stric
Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was
Minutes : Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, December 13,, 1972
Page 4
ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-119
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANTCQMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE
CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
.AYES Lipps, Palin, Spencer
NOES; None
ABSENT: None
Administrative Review No. 72-120 is a request to permit the con-
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-120
Applicant.',-Joe Shaffer
struction of 'a four unit apartment complex pursuant to S.9231.1
of the Ordinance Code on proper%ty located on the west side of 13th
Street approximately 80 feet north of Walnut Avenue in
Density Residential District.
Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present.
the R4 High
ON MOTION BY PALINSECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWNO. 72-120
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE
CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTTNGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE :
AYES: Lipps, Palin,:Spencer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-129
Applicant: J. N. Shaffer
Administrative Review No. 72-129 is a request to permit the con-
struction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of.the
Ordinance Code on property located on the northwest corner of
Walnut Avenue and 17th Street in the RS High Density Residential
District..
Mr.
Mr.
for
Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present.
Jim Palin encouraged the
fencing.
use of material other than grape stake
Mr. Shaffer stated, that the fence ;,,rill be cordstructed of bat-on-
board.
Mr. Palin stated that regarding open space to the units, Units A
and B are very good. Behind the,structure is 102,sq. ft. for Unit
A, but there has been no door provided to enable using it, He
sugges ted removing the des-ignationof A and B and a rear open space
and leave it undesign.ated-. If the open space is designated, it
should be designated for Units C and D.
Mr. Pat Spencer started/that dedication would be required for a
future curb linedeve opment and dedication is required prior to
iss -ince of building"permits.11
ON MOTION BY PALIN.'SECOND'BY SPENCERADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-129
WAS APPROVED SUBJICT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
Patio area for Units A and B to be enclosed with a board on
'bat fence instead of grapestake.
Open space designated for units Aand B ,to be
designAte the open space for units C and D,
changed to