Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972120 - Supporting DocumentsEXEMPTION DECLARATION FORM PROJECT, NUMBER: E. E.D. 72- 37 PROJECT` TI1TLE/DESCRIPTTON; PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRUSS: PROJECT CENSUS TRACT (i f known REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE: November 21, 1972 s view Board In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of-1970 (specifically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code), the E.I.R. Review Committee has reviewed the Interim Short Form Environ- mental Impact Report material submitted in request for Exemption Declaration status for the above described project and hereby recommends: (check one, That the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report submitted is insufficient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental signi- ficance of this project and the project sponsor is therefore requested to resubmit a pure thorough{ environmental Short Form covering the following information That the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and has not been covered adequately in a previously approved Short Form Environmental Impact Report. Ex_emtion Declara- tion status therefore cannot be ranted for thisroject an an Environmental mnact to , is t ere reauire to e submittecT-to this department and the City shall prepare an E.I.R. prior to the project's approval. The significant environmental impacts which may result from this project include--but may not be limited to--the following:- j That; the proposed project cannot , or will not, have a sign ificant effect on the environment. Exem tion Declaration Status is there- fore; ranted for this project an t e, sum.a.ttal of an Environmental Im act tatement is thereby not necessary. That even though theproposea project`may have a. significant effect on the environment, the proj ect is a lesser included part of another project for which an.environmental Impact Report has previously been prepared, provided that the project and E.I.R. was approved and covers the specif i c environmental impacts of the lesser project. (In this case, the previous project and statement should be noted: Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments. Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 3 3. Administrative Review No. 72-121 to become null and void if City amends development standards, applicable to this area. 4. Administrative Review No. 72-121 will become subject to,, development standards in effect at time building permits are issued. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-126 Applicant: `t: D. Zehnder Administrative Review No. 72-126 is a request to permit the con- struction of 6 unit pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the west side of 16th street approximately 80 ft. south of Olive Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. Mr. L. D. Zehnder, applicant, was present. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS,'ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW'=io,72-126 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-118 Applicant; Joe Shaffer Administrative Review No. 72-118 is a request to permit the construction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance-Code on property located on the west side of 7th Street approximately 80 ft, north of Olive Street in the R4 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. Jim Palin_stated that a floor. plan layout was requested by the Planning Department and they have been submitted and reviewed and are in compliance with codes provisions, ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS PEMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-118 WAS. APPROVED SUBJECT TO,;+ THE APPLICA+I" ''OMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTI'11GTON BEACH (;.FINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWINGVt1T E AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT:, None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. Aplicant:. Joe Shaffer 72-119 Jim Palin suggested that Administrative Review Nos. 72-118, 72-119, -'72-120 and 72-131 all be discussed at the same time. Administrative Review No. 72-119 is a request to permit the con struction of a four unit apartment unit in the R5 High Density Residential District on property located on the west side of 13th Street approximately 130 ft. north of Walnut Avenue in the R5 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 4 ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-119 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYELipps, Paln, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None A ISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-120 ft Applicant: Joe Shaffer Administrative Review No. 724120 is a request to permit the con- struction of.a four unit apartment complex pursuant to S. 9231.1 of t?ie Ordinance Code on property located on the west side of 13th Street approximately 80 feet north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 High, Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-120 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE C 0ITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING wES: Lipps, Palin , Spencer ` -I}None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-129 Applicant : J. N. Shaffer .Administrative Review No. 72-129 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6<,of the Ordinance Code on property located on the northwest corner of Walnut Avenue and 17th Street in the R5 High Density Residential District. Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. Mr. Jim Palin encouraged the use of material other than grape stake for fencing. Mr. Shaffer stated that the fence will be constructed of bat-on- board. Mr. Palin stated that'regarding open space to the units, Units A and B are very good. Behind the structure is 102 sq. ft. for Unit A, but there has been no door provided to enable using it. He suggested removing the designation of A. and B and a rear open space and leave it undesignated. If the open space is designated, it should be designated for Units C and D. Mr. Pat Spencer stated that dedication would be required for a future curb line development and dedication is required prior to issuance of building permits. ON, MOTION BY PALIN SECOND, BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO772-129 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING' VOTE: 1. Patio area for Units ,A and B to bebat fence instead of grapestake.- enclosed with a board on 2. Open space designated for units A and B -to be changed to designate the open space for units C and D. 1 B!2A 12/13/72