HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972129 - Supporting DocumentsEXEMPTION DECLARAT-ION FORM
PROJECT NUMBER: E.D. 72-,32 DATE:November 21, 1972
LI
PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION:four unit a artment house
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS: 201 7th Street
PROJECT CENSUS TRACT (if known):NA
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT Environmental Rev-ew Board
In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding
implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970
(specifically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code), the
E.I.R. Review Committee has reviewed the Interim Short Form Environ-
mental Impact Report material submitted in request for Exemption
Declaration,, status for the above described project and hereby
recommends: (check one)
That the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report submitted is
insufficient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental signi -
ficance of this project and the project sponsor is therefore
requested to resubmit a more thorough Environmental Short Form
covering the following information
That the proposed project M have a significant effect on the
environment and has not been covered adequately in a previously,approved Short Form Environmental Impact Report. Exemption Declara -
tion status therefore cannot be ranted for this ro'ect and an
Environmental Im act to is t ere re uire to e su mitte-cT-to
this department and the City shall prepare an E,I.R. prior to the,
project's approval. The significant environmental impacts which may
result from this project include--but may not be limited to--the
following:
F-_ -That the proposed project cannot, or will not, have .a significant
effect on the environment. Exem tion Declaration Status is there-
fore ranted for this project an t e su mi:ttalof an Environmental
Im act tatement is thereb not necessar
That even though the proposed project may have a significant `effect
on the environment, the project is a lesser included part of another,
proiect.for which an Environmental ;Impact Report has previously. been,
prepared, provided that the project and E.I.R. was approved and
covers the specific environmental impacts of the lesser project, (1n
this case, the previous project and statement should be noted
APPROVED BY :
t" 0
Al -
Mr. Joe ,Shaffer, applicant, was p`tgsent.
ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO 72°.
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING;
VOTE
1. Patio area for'-Units A and B to be enclosed with a board on,
bat fence instead of grapestake..
G.
Mr. Shaffer stated that the fence will be constructed of bat-on-
board
for fencing.
Mr. Jim Palin encouraged the use of material other than grape stake.
Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday , December 13, 1972
Page 4
ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-1.19
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT-,`COMPLYING WITH ALL, APPLICABLE
CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE :
AYES Lipps, Palin, Spencee
NOES: None
ABSENT: "-None
ADMINISTRATIVE.REVIEW Nd. 72-120
Applicant: Joe' Shaff.e'r
Administrative ReViewNo. 72-120 is a request to permit the con-
struction of a four unit apartment complex pursuant to S. 9231.1
of the Ordinanci Code on`'property located on the west side of 13th;
Street approximately 80 feet north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 Hight:
Density Resi!`dential District.,` ,,
ON MOTION BY -PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-1.20'
WAS ,/APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE
CO ITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING
TE.
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-129
Applicant: J. N. Shaffer
Dzstrsct.
Administrative Review No. 72-129 is a request to permit the con-
struction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the
Ordinance Code on property located on the northwest corner of
Walnut Avenue and 17th; Street in the R5 High Density ,Residential
Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present.
A.but there ,has been no door provided to enable using it. He 4
and B are very good. Behind the structure is sq . ft. for Unit-
Mr. . Palin stated that regarding open space to tl .- units, I'-nits A
should be designated. for Units C and D.fb
and leave it undesignated. If the open space is designated, it
suggests removing t e esignatLon o A an B and a rear open spaC
f'j Mr. Pat Spencer stated that dedication'would be required for a
future curb line deve;lopnnent and dedication is required prior to
issuance of building permits.
Open space designated for units:A and B to'be changed to
designate the open,
Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments,
Wednesday, December 13, 1972
Page 5
3. Applicant to comply with all applicable provisions of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer
NOES: None
ABSEN : None
stxuction of a our unit apartment pursuant to.S. 9231.6 of the
Ordinance Code n property located on The west side of 16th Street
approximately 80 ,feet south of'Orange Avenue in the R4 High Density
Residential District.
ADMINISTRATIVE 'I'ii J. 72-131
Applicant: J. i... 6haffer
Administrative Review No. 72-131 is a request to'permit the con-
Mr. Joe Shaff }r, applicant, was present.
ON MOTION'BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-131
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TQ THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL PROVISIONS
OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Lipps
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
USE PERMIT NO.
Palin, Spencer
72-80
Applicant: American Permit
Use Permit No. 72-80 is a request to permit the operation of a
service station within an existing service station site pursuant
to S . 9480 of the ordinance code on. property' located on the south-
west corner of Warner Avenue and Newland Street in the G2 Community
Business District.
The Chairman opened the public hearing' n,Use Permit No.72-80.
Mr. Carl'Rodeheaver, representing the applicant, was present.
_Mr. JimPalin..s.tated;that the plan does not conform to Article 948
in the toll
1. The six percent landscaping requirement
2. Screening of restrooms and enclosed areas
.sketched out areas on. the plan and st ated that a 6 ft. monument
Mr. Palm stated that he had contacted the architect to obtain a
revised plot plan but was unsuccessful in doing so.
Mr. Rodeheaver stated that he can conform to the requirements and
4. The Board of Zoning Adjustments -recommends a monument, sign
3. On site 15 gal. trees
i