Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972129 - Supporting DocumentsEXEMPTION DECLARAT-ION FORM PROJECT NUMBER: E.D. 72-,32 DATE:November 21, 1972 LI PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION:four unit a artment house PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS: 201 7th Street PROJECT CENSUS TRACT (if known):NA REVIEWING DEPARTMENT Environmental Rev-ew Board In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (specifically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code), the E.I.R. Review Committee has reviewed the Interim Short Form Environ- mental Impact Report material submitted in request for Exemption Declaration,, status for the above described project and hereby recommends: (check one) That the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report submitted is insufficient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental signi - ficance of this project and the project sponsor is therefore requested to resubmit a more thorough Environmental Short Form covering the following information That the proposed project M have a significant effect on the environment and has not been covered adequately in a previously,approved Short Form Environmental Impact Report. Exemption Declara - tion status therefore cannot be ranted for this ro'ect and an Environmental Im act to is t ere re uire to e su mitte-cT-to this department and the City shall prepare an E,I.R. prior to the, project's approval. The significant environmental impacts which may result from this project include--but may not be limited to--the following: F-_ -That the proposed project cannot, or will not, have .a significant effect on the environment. Exem tion Declaration Status is there- fore ranted for this project an t e su mi:ttalof an Environmental Im act tatement is thereb not necessar That even though the proposed project may have a significant `effect on the environment, the project is a lesser included part of another, proiect.for which an Environmental ;Impact Report has previously. been, prepared, provided that the project and E.I.R. was approved and covers the specific environmental impacts of the lesser project, (1n this case, the previous project and statement should be noted APPROVED BY : t" 0 Al - Mr. Joe ,Shaffer, applicant, was p`tgsent. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO 72°. WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING; VOTE 1. Patio area for'-Units A and B to be enclosed with a board on, bat fence instead of grapestake.. G. Mr. Shaffer stated that the fence will be constructed of bat-on- board for fencing. Mr. Jim Palin encouraged the use of material other than grape stake. Minutes: Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday , December 13, 1972 Page 4 ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-1.19 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT-,`COMPLYING WITH ALL, APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES Lipps, Palin, Spencee NOES: None ABSENT: "-None ADMINISTRATIVE.REVIEW Nd. 72-120 Applicant: Joe' Shaff.e'r Administrative ReViewNo. 72-120 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment complex pursuant to S. 9231.1 of the Ordinanci Code on`'property located on the west side of 13th; Street approximately 80 feet north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 Hight: Density Resi!`dential District.,` ,, ON MOTION BY -PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-1.20' WAS ,/APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CO ITIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING TE. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 77-129 Applicant: J. N. Shaffer Dzstrsct. Administrative Review No. 72-129 is a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code on property located on the northwest corner of Walnut Avenue and 17th; Street in the R5 High Density ,Residential Mr. Joe Shaffer, applicant, was present. A.but there ,has been no door provided to enable using it. He 4 and B are very good. Behind the structure is sq . ft. for Unit- Mr. . Palin stated that regarding open space to tl .- units, I'-nits A should be designated. for Units C and D.fb and leave it undesignated. If the open space is designated, it suggests removing t e esignatLon o A an B and a rear open spaC f'j Mr. Pat Spencer stated that dedication'would be required for a future curb line deve;lopnnent and dedication is required prior to issuance of building permits. Open space designated for units:A and B to'be changed to designate the open, Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments, Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 5 3. Applicant to comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSEN : None stxuction of a our unit apartment pursuant to.S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance Code n property located on The west side of 16th Street approximately 80 ,feet south of'Orange Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential District. ADMINISTRATIVE 'I'ii J. 72-131 Applicant: J. i... 6haffer Administrative Review No. 72-131 is a request to'permit the con- Mr. Joe Shaff }r, applicant, was present. ON MOTION'BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-131 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TQ THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Lipps NOES: None ABSENT: None USE PERMIT NO. Palin, Spencer 72-80 Applicant: American Permit Use Permit No. 72-80 is a request to permit the operation of a service station within an existing service station site pursuant to S . 9480 of the ordinance code on. property' located on the south- west corner of Warner Avenue and Newland Street in the G2 Community Business District. The Chairman opened the public hearing' n,Use Permit No.72-80. Mr. Carl'Rodeheaver, representing the applicant, was present. _Mr. JimPalin..s.tated;that the plan does not conform to Article 948 in the toll 1. The six percent landscaping requirement 2. Screening of restrooms and enclosed areas .sketched out areas on. the plan and st ated that a 6 ft. monument Mr. Palm stated that he had contacted the architect to obtain a revised plot plan but was unsuccessful in doing so. Mr. Rodeheaver stated that he can conform to the requirements and 4. The Board of Zoning Adjustments -recommends a monument, sign 3. On site 15 gal. trees i