Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972139 - Supporting DocumentsIMUL NOTICE OF ACTION _?Vr om =--A.r-1zEvirPw-wn-ff-,W PROJECT NUMBER: __ED DATE REVIEWED:11-29-72 PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION:- r m t buildin (Charles Hermansen) 109 PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS:114 10th Street In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies rega rding imple- mentation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (speci- fically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code),the E.I.R. Review Committee has, reviewed the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report material submitted in request for Exemption Declaration status for the above described project and hereby recommends: (check one) 1. That the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report submitted is insufficient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental, signifi- cance of this project and the project sponsor is therefore requested to resubmit a more thorough Environmental Short Form covering the following information; That the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environ - ment and has not been covered adequately in a previously approved Short Form Environmental Impact Report. Exemption Declaration status therefore cannot be. granted for this project and an Environmental Impact study is thereby required to be submitted to this department and the City shall prepare an B .I.R. prior to the project's approval. The significant environmental. impacts which may result from this project include--but may not be limited to--the following F" 3. That the proposed project cannot, or will not. have a significant effect on the environment. Exemption Declaration St, ' is therefore granted for this project and the submittal of an Enviri,.,ntental Impact Statement is thereby not necessary. That even though the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, the project is a lesser included part of another project which has previously been exempted or for which an Environmental Impact Report has previously been prepared, provided that the project and E.I.R. was approved and covers the specific environmental impacts of the lesser project.. (In this case, the previous project and statement should be noted.) E 5. That even though the proposed project is a part of a larger existing established use of land which may have or has had a significant affect on the environment, the proposed project, when considered alone, contributes an insignificant impact on the environment t herefore exemption declaration status is granted. APPROVED BY: , Environmental Review Board Secretary DATE : l -'30 P7 , Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments- Wednesday, December 13, 1972 1 ngo The C1 nirrnan opened the public hearing ;on Conditional,` Exception No. 72 -4 00,} _; Messrs, Fowler and Bill Wonacott were present reesent i.ng. the applicants. The Chairr&an closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER COND 'IONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-100' WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : 1. The 48 1Xich wall as shown on they 'plan shall be constructed with material compatible with the unit. The reason for this requirement is that the CitywCouncil has recently amended the ordinance code to allow use of this type of open space to allow variations in the frofit yard setbacks. 2. Conditional Exception No*' 72-100 shall become null and void unless condit'ions of approval for Administrative Review No. 72-150 are com\lied with. AYES: Lipps , Pal , Sl"encer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPSAD14INISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. i" '0 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT fTO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLO ',G VOTE: 1. Applicant to elocate" `Yhe open space area along the alley to the interiorjfroperty 1'ne. Said area shall be enclosed with a 6 ft. high=masonry val., along the common property line ana parallel with the alley except within 5 ft. of the corner in which case /said wall shall, step down to 42 inches. 2. A revised/plot plan to be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustmerfts prior to issuance4,of building permits. 3. Administrative Review No. 72-lSO to become null and void if the cit' amends development standards applicable to the area. 4. Admini.9trative Review No. 72-150 will be subject to develop - ment standards in effect at the time building permits are issued. 5. Applicant to provide a minimum of 25 ft. turning radius for the two open parking spaces off the alley. AYES: 'Lipps , Palin , Spencer NOES : None ABSENT: None 'ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO . 72-139 pplicant Charles Hermansen Aclministrativ`e Review No. 72-139 is a request to permit the con- structon of a four unit apartment pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the ordinance code on property located on the east side of 10th Street approximately 155 ft. south of Walnut Avenue in the R4 Density Resi dential District. Mr. Charles Hermansen , applicant, was present Mr, Jim Palin stated. that the open space meets the criteria estab- lished and all setbacks are ok. Minutes: H . B. Board of Z oning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972' Page 10 ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-139 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ORDINANCE CODE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:,,. AYES: Lipps , Palin , Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-135 in conjunction with DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-39 in conjunction with CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-98 Appi,cant: James L.`Wood Administ'xative Review No. 72-135 is a request to perrist the con- struction\of an 18,631 sq. ft. concrete tilt up industrial building Restricted Manufacturing District. Division of Land No . 72-39 is a request to permit" the consolidation of three 1os into two lots and Conditional Exception No. 72-98 is a request to permit an encroachment of 15 ft.-into the=rxequired 15 ft. side yard , setback in lieu of S. 9413 of the ordinance code. Subject property is located on the east side of Computer Lane approximately .630 ft. south of McFadden avenue in the 100-M1 -A-20,000 pursuant too S. 9511. r.FOLLOWING VOTE: The Chairman opened the public hearingg on'Conditional Exception No. 72-98. 1 Mr. John Flick, John Alexander Co ., representing the applicant, was present and discussed the project. The Chairman closed the public,?liearing. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BYI,SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-98 WAS APPROVED SUBI4ECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE VOTE: 1. Property adjacent b''e.`constructed at zero setback or a minimum of 30 ft. setback aspproposed by the Planning Commission and required on the Lusk\Industrial Park for the reason that this, provides greater flexibility and usability of the property and the Planning Comnfissignhas approved these standards and they will become effective "shortly. AYES : Lipps,, Pal'in, Spencer NOES : None ABSENT' None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, DIVISION OF LAND NO. 72-39 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING layout. 1. The plot plan received Novemper 17, 197 2 shall be the approved 3. Water ,supply shal l be through t k.e City of Huntington Beach's 'water ,system at the time each pa ,cel is developed. compliea with. 2. All appl cable co nditions of ten tative Tract 6948 shall be Sewage disposal shall be through tthe City of Huntington Beach's sewage system at the time each parcel is developed. 5. The property shall participate in tl.'e local drainage assess - ment district at the time each parcel is deirelope d.