HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972141 - Supporting Documents.NOTICr OF ACTION
V Mft ENTAL REVIEW BOARD.-
PROJECT NUMBER: ED 72-67 DATE REVIEWED: 11-29-72
PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION: sin le famil dwelling
Leosiar in org
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS: 616 16th Street
Impact study is thereby required to be submitted to this department
and the city shall prepare an E.I.R. prior to the project's approval.
The significant environmental impacts which may result from this
project include--but may not be limited to--the following:
That the proposed project cannot, or will not, have a significant effect
on the environment. Exemption' Declaration Status is.therefore granted
for this project and the submittal rif an Environmental Impact Statement
is thereby not necessary.
ment and has not been covered adequately in'a previously approved
Short Form Environmental Impact Report. Exemption Declaration status
therefore cannot be -ranted for this project and an Environmental
Impact Report material submitted in request for Exemption lleclaration
status for the above described project and hereby recommends: (check
one)
That the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report submitted is,
insufficient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental signifi-
cance of this project and the project sponsor is therefore requested
to resubmit a more thorough Environmental Short Form covering the
following information:
That the proposed project may have a significant effect on theenviron-
In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding imple
mentation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (speci-
fically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code), the E.I.R..
Review. Comm.ittee..has reviewed.. the . _ Interim Short. Form Environmental
4. That even --though t`te proposed project may have a.signi:ficant effect on
the' environment, the project is a lesser included part of another
project which has previously been exempted or for which an Environmental
Impact Report has previo 'csly been prepared, provided that the project
and E.I.R. was approved and covers the specific environmental impacts
of the lesser project. (In this case, the previous project and statement
should be noted,)
U S. That even though the proposed project is a part of a larger existing
established use of land which may have or has had a significant affect
on the environment, the: proposed project, when considered alone,
contributes an insignificant impact on the environment therefore
exemption declaration status is granted.
APPROVED BY:
Environmental Review Board
Secretary
DATE !
Pono Ximibb,
Planning Dept.
City of Huntington Beach
P. 0., Box 190
Huntington Beach , Cal-if.,
RECEIVED
DEC 22 1912'
PLANNING DEPT.
Gentlemen:
Regarding our Board of Zoning Adjustment 472-141, we.
wish to'cont i nue the Administrative R eview hearing
,for two, weeks .
MINUTES
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Administrative Annex
523 Main Street
Huntington Beach, Ca.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13 1972 - 1:15 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Spencer, Patin, Ljpps
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72- `'"'
A licant: Leonard A. Lindbor
ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO.'72-141 WAS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 20, 1972, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Lipps, Spencer, Pal.in
NOES-., N
ABSENT: None
^:' fINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-111
ni r c(onju cti on w/ithi
jRd CT .'"i. hOF . LAND L7O -72 35-.
in conj un on with
Exception No. 72-93
The Chairman opened the publ c` earing on Conditional
the C2 Community Business Dis-iict.
Administrative ,view No. 72-11 is a request "permit the
construction of a commercial comply includig offices,
commercial busines , restaurants and finan iaal institutions
pursuant to S. 9430 Division of Land No72-35-i.s a request
to create three parc is from one existi parcel. Conditional
Exception No. 72-93 i a request to pe it the construction
of a separation wall t be located 19, t. west of the exist-
ing property line of a roposed, commercial complex, in lieu
of S. 9792.1.3 for the p pose of t e wall setback to allow
parking spaces relatld to the pro sed complex to be located
adjacent to an existing al y, bject property is located
at the northeast corner of 9arj Street and Beach. Blvd. in
CONDITIONAL CEPTION NO. 72-93
A licant: H itin ton Ca ital Cor
Mr. Jim Palin stated t$at a letter h been received from
adjacent property ownedrs objecting to the proposed wall and
suggesting there wou d be traffic problems
Mr. Adolph Lear ad, ressed the Board in op osition to the
and described the proposed project
Mr. Everett Dodge, representing thh applicant, was present
prof ect.
Mr. Gordon Combs, a property owner in the a.:-e, addressed
the Board in o/position to the project.
Mr . EE. Pessekk,a property owner in the area, adds ssed the
Board in opplosition to the project.
closed the public hearing.
There being no one further present to speak, the Chairman
IV
J1UNTINGTON
MINUTES
BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ABJUSTMENTS
Administrative Annex
523 Main Street
Huntington Beach , Calif.
WEDNESTAY-i DECEMBER 20 972 - 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESEN Spencer, McFarland, Palin
BOARD MEMBERS ABS T None
AGENDA ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED, OR WITHDRAWN:
ADMINITRATI REVIEW NO. 72-141
Applicant: Leonard 0 . Lindbcr
To permit the construction of a single family three bedroom
residence pursuant to S. 9161.2 of the Ordinance Code located.
on the east side of 16th Street approximately 100 ft, south
of Palm Avenue in the R2 Medium Density Residential District.
The. Board noted the applicant would need to file revised
plans as the current plans exceed maximum coverage of the
property. The applicant would. be contacted to submit a
revised set of plot plans.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY M' FARLAND AND SECONDED BY PALIN TO CONTtF;UE
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-141 TO JANUARY 3, 1972 FOR A RE
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-92 - Continued
A 1i ant: Coast Develo ment Co.
VISED PLOT PLAN.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Pal,.
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ABSENT: None
To permit construction of two-story office building using zero
side yar , on south property line and obtaining easement from
property caner on north for ingress and egress to parking stalls.
In Conjunctin With
CONDITIONAL EX PTION NO. 72-88 = Cointinued
Applicant: Coa Devela ment Co.
To permit the cons uction of n office building with a zero
side yard setback i lieu of , ft. as required by Code,
S.9404.3 (c) located o thea st side of Main Street approxi-
mately 400 ft . south o e intersection of Beach Boulevard
in the R5 Office Profe.s onal. Zone.
The applicant i s cur entl trying to secure easements across
the abutting prope y. The oard farther suggested . the abutting,
property owner fi e apropos development plan//"if his property
prior to action n these item
A MOTION WAS D E BY PALIN ANDS ONDED BY MCFARLAND"'TO TABLE
ADMINISTRAT E REVIEW NO. 72-92 A CONDITIONAL EXCPTION
NO. 72 -88 F R AN INDEFINITE PERIOD TIME FOR THE SECURING
OF EASEME S AND A DEVELOPMENTPLAN.
ROLL CA L VOTE :
AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin
NOES. None
ABS T : None
TIT MOTION CARRIED,.
Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning. Adjustments
Wednesday, January 3, 1973
Page -7
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-141 - Continued
To permit the construction of a single family three bedroom
residence pursuant to S. 9161.2 of the Ordinance Code located
on the east side of 16th Street approximately 100 ft. south
of Palm'Avenue in the R2 Medium Density Residential District;''.
A- licant Legna 0 . Lindbor
Mr. Lindborg, the applicant, addressed the Board.
This applica-L.,Jn was continued for submittal of a revised
plan and reduction in the overall coverage.
The Board noted the revised plans as requested had not yet
been received and therefore recommended a continuance.
ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY MCFARLAND ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW NO..72-14;[. WAS, CONTINUED FOR REVISED PLOT PLANS BY
THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, McFarland, Palin
NOES;;. None
A,$SE? T : None
Applicant Lowell D. Zehnder;
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO, 72-154
Iota e wes U L trees approximate y e L. sour oL.f
Oliv e Avenue in the R4 High Density ResideaAal District .
M' Zehnder , the applicant , addre ssed t /Boar d and explained
pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Huntington Beach,,.Ordinance Code
f 16`11 S 1 12 "f ht d
To permit the construction of a 6 unit apartment" complex
the re ues tq., ti
shown on he plan
In re iewing the plans , the Board noted there were exceptionally
largeNlosets measuring approxim at ity 9 ft, by 9 ft. and
could pgssibly be used as bedroom Moreover ,parking as
closets and create a dressing oom or boudoir area.
Mr. Zehnd r, indicated that he uld reduce the size of the
1. The plot plan received December 13, 1972 as amended
ON MOTION BY ?ki'LIN AND SECOcD EY MCFARLAND ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW •NO 72-1\54 WAS APPRTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
BY THE FOLLOWING- ROLL CALL' VOTE:
shall be the approve d layout.
'Elevations shall submitted to the Board of Zoning
Adjustments for pp; o, val, action,
AYES: "Spencer, , IcFarla' }d, Pali,n
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
4
To permit thq,'"construction of two unit apartment buildings,
pursuant to { S. 9231.6 of the Huntin on Beach Ordinance (`ode,
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-1 3
A licant: Fred M. HellerFae,.
In C-on j unc.fion With
CONDITIO AL EXCEPTION NO. 72-105.
A l ica ,'t Fred M. Heller
To"permit a S ft „ `exterior side yard 'setback "z lieu of the
required 2G.ft, setback pursuant to S, 9203,2.2""qof the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code located on the sd'thwest
Residential District.
corner of Orange Avenue and 12th Street in the R4 High Density
_7 1/3/73 - BZA
Minutes: H.D. Boa ` of Zoning Adjustments - ,
Wednesday, January 17, 1973
Page 2
In conjunction with
C6 ITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-107 - Continued''
A licant: H. M. Richardson
of th Ordinance Code.
To permit a z,ro side and rear
yar setback in lieu of the required I ,ft. side and rear
yard etback as per S. 9471.4.1 (b) a S. 9471.4.1 (c),
The Ac ng Secretary informed
the Board that he will be meetin with the applicant on
January 9th to discuss alterna 'ves for said proposal;
therefore ontinuance to Janua y 24th meeting is
recommende The applicant c ncurs.
MOTION WAS MADE BY EADIE AND
SECONDED BY SPENCER TO CON INUE USE PERMIT NO. 72-92 AND
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-107 TO JANUARY 24, 1973, FOR
THE AFOREMENTIONED REASO S.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, McFar and, Eadie,
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED
ADMINISTRATIVE RE IEW NO, 72-157
Yr..._t_voT, ,_Fnr Gs,cia1 S .. v
A lic Cent l Friedman
urarv _Inc.._.
To permit-the construction of two
medical built ngs located ae the southeast corner of Beach
Blvd. and Ne an Avenue in the R5 Office Professional
District.,.k
The Ac ing Secretary i nformed
the Boar that he will meet with Dr. Friedman on January
19th to iscuss merits of the plan,'-,,,therefore continuance
to Janu y 24th is recommended.
A MOTION WAS,. MADE BY MCFARLAND
ANDS .ONDED BY EADIE TO CONTINUE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 7157 TO JANUARY 24, 1973 FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED
RFA 4f9N
ROL CALL VOTE :
AYE Spencer, McFarland, Eadie
NOS: None
THE. MOTION CARRIED
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-141 - Continued
AR21ir-ant : 'Leonard 0. Lindbor
To permit--he construction of
a single family three bedroom residence pursuant to
S.9161.2 of the, Ordinance Code located on the east side
of 16th Street approximately 100 ft. south of Palm
Avenue in the R2 Medium Density Residential' District,
to code requirements.; with,.regard to lot ,coverage a The
Acting , Secretary also pointed out that this item has been
continued several times and no revised plans were sub-
It was noted that the plan, as submitted , did not conformThe Board reviewed the proposa
mitted.
Minutes: H.B. ;Bbard of Zoning Adjustments,
Wednesday, January 17, 1973
Page 3
NOES: None
THE MOTION CARRIED
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND
AND SECONDED BY EADIE TO DENY ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO.
72-141 EJR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
1. Administrative Review No . 72-141 has been continued
tyeveral times and the applicant failed to sutimit
'revised plans.
;B:JLL CALL VOTE :
AYES: Spencer , McFarland, Eadie
DIVISION OF LAND NO 73-1.
existing lot.
Tn conjunction with
USE PERMIT NO. 72-85
use permit application.
1
To permit 'tae construction of
an 8 unit e.partment complex pursuant./to S. 9162.3.1 of
the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code/located'at the east
side of Del9yare Street approximately 330 ft. north of
VS ,ktc w - `_..v u e t iri Q_7 .t t Res den tialin hR.2 M e dilD. Vtimi' 1V 2:4taC: 1-max LiuL ...-Y
District .
t,.> The hearing was opened to the
,audience. The applicant addre bed the Board and explained
the proposal. Conditions for division of land were dis-cussed. It was ngted that the applicant did not need the
A licant: Ral h Cover
the hearing was clos' d.
there being no further comment
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MCFARLAND
AND SECONDED BY SPENCEI/ro WITHDRAW USE PERMIT NO. 72-85,
A FURTHER MOTION WAS MADE BY
A. TO BE COMPLETED 'PRIOR '1 O ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
1. The plot plan received January 3, 1973 shall be the.
MCFARLAND AND SECONDEDYBt,SPENCER_TO APPROVE DIVISION OF
LAND NO. 73-1 UPON THE FOLOWING CONDITIONS:
approved layoute
Delawareand England Streets shall be dedicated and,ilfully improved to city standards at the time each
parcel ..is developed;F
The Derision of Land shalf ;,i not be effective until
an agteement is.signed and`'Irecorded agreeing to
the conditi ons listed above I`
TOE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION:
I.,A Parcel Map -hall be filed with the City and
recorded prior to framing inspection of any structures
on any F
