HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972149 - Supporting DocumentsT-I B F -ACTION
OMEN AL REVIEW BOARD
PROJECT NUMBER: ED-72-68 DATE REVIEWED: 11-29-72
PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION: Four- lex, Lots 6 4 8, Block 220 (Town Lot area)
Fowler Deve opment o
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS:21st Street
In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding imple-
mentation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (speci-
fically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code), the E.I.R.
Review Committee has reviewed the Interim Short Form Environmental
Impact Report material submitted in request for Exemption Declaration
status for the -above described project and hereby recommends: (check
one)
That the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report submitted is
insufficient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental signifi-
cance of this project and the project sponsor is therefore requested
to resubmit a more thorough Environmental Short Form covering the
following information:
2. That the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environ -
ment and has not been covered adequately in a previously approved
Short Form Environmental lmpact Report. Exemption Declaration status
therefore cannot be granted for this project and an Environmental
Impact study is thereby required to be submitted to this department
and the City shall prepare an E.I.R. prior to the project's approval.
.The significant environmental impacts which may result from this
project include--but may not be limited to--the following:
3. That the proposed project cannot, or will not, have a significant effect
Lam! on the environment. Exemption Declaration Status is therefore granted
for this project and the submittal of an Environmental Impact Statement
is thereby not necessary.
4. That even: though the proposed project may have a significant effect on
the environment, the project is a lesser included part of another .
project which has previously been exempted or for which an Environmental
Impact Report has previously been prepared, provided that the project
and E.I.R. was approved and covers the specific environmental impacts
of the lesser project. (In this case, the previous project and statement
should be noted.)
D 5. That even though the proposed project is. a part of a larger existing
established use of land which may have or has had a significant affect
on the environment, the proposed project, when considered alone, i?
contributes an insignificant impact on the environment therefore.
exemption declaration status is,granted
APPROVED BY:
Environmental Review Board.
Secretary
14- 0"DATE,-,
;? 4 :0 MAIN STREET . HUNTINA rC*I SEA:
i4}
to ':.'. FOSTER
rcc F+Rit e,c" 1-°QZhe,TlL, IaANAf1&H
)rt'.c bra r 1.9 q 3,97 2
Bo are,
v: : Z "nl,*,',d
•:a :','.. _'M:`
fo p 'a1 .,x :k:blY each
11`piE7*ie"$?> 7 :i"53`# 7., ;2cS „'tl . :i2 .",e'7'aXCt ti7
`.
W.t"ti ats ;,ill' k.. l es at 'at D Chc `_ti: St.'.. i Of .MO 5 +,i•
i,L 7.•'o. laAf?, 16 in i 1 7' '. 120 CC xr:M0 'A-! 04 :sY19'°cK:Ik0i
Minutes: H. 13, ,Board of Zo.,
Wednesday, December 13, 1972'
Page 7
Adjustments
11, Packing compounds shall be screened with a combination of
faking and .iands(c.-aping., Said plan shall be approves! by the
Bo d of Zoning Adjustments. ,;,-rK
pi n, shall be constructed within the prole
1 '012. NoIstructures, other than those shown on the -Pproved. plot
1.3. All` applicable City Ordinances shall be 096mplied with.
i4. App l icant shall relocate the 10 ft. 18 ft. overhead garage
dooras sho wn on the southwest corner of the building easterly
to "locate them between Spaces 6, 7/ and 8, 9 , to facilitate
1 AYES: Lkpps, Palin, Spencer
the tprni ng radius.
NOES : Noise
'ABSENT: None
F
Applicant: Fran hire Realty 'Interstate
USE PERMIT NO. 12-78
Use Permit No. 72-9a8 is a Bequest to pern_it the remodeling and
expansion of an existing estaurant pursuant to S. 9472 of the
I iuntington Beach Ordlnare Code on property' located on the north
fide of Edinger Avenue approximately 292 ft. east of Edwards Street
n the C4 Highway Comr eKcial District.
The Chairman opened/the public hearing on Use P-0 t No, 72-78.
Mr. Eichbergerepresenting the, applicant was present.
Mr._ J i m Palinstated that there could be some control required in
the park i ng .Trea, possibly' posting
M:r. Carl "Dunca 'n, i re Depax ment , left the meetI g'.
ON `MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, USt,,PERMIT NO. 72-78 WAS
APPROVED UBJECT TO THE CURB ALONG THE-EASPROPERTY LINE BEING
PAINTED ED TO INDICATE NO P,{IRKING, BY THE FbiLOWING VOTE
The Chairma closed the public Iiearin
AYES : Lipps, Palin,
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Spencer
CONDr IONAL EXCEPTION . NO, 7'2-99
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-149
Applicant: Fowler Development C,
Administrative Review No. 72-149 is a request to permit the construc-
tion of a four-plex building pursuant to S. 9231.6 of the Ordinance
Code.
Conditional Exception No. 72-99 is a. request to.permit the construc-
tion of a.4 ft. high patio enclosure wall to be located within the
front yard setback in lieu of S 9234 of the Ordinance Code. Subject
property is located on the east side of,21st Street, approximately
80 ft. north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 High Density Residential
District.
No. 72-99.
Messrs,.', Fowler and Bill Wonacott were present representing the
The Chairman opened the public hearing on Conditional Exception
applicant.
Minutes: H.B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Wednesday,, December 13, 1972
Page 8
Applicant toprovide a`minimum of 25 ft.
open parking spaces off the alley.
Mr. Palin stated that the Board of Zoning Adjustments does not
feel the open space is usable with a wall around it as shown. The
Board suggests providing a. gate and a 6 ft. wall to within five feet
of the corner and then step down to 42". This accomplished the turning
radius in the alley and on site. The applicant was advised that the project
i s within the:-moratorium area.
The Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-99r
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
1. The 48 inch wall as shown on the plan shall be constructed with
material compatible with the unit. The reason for this requirement
is that the City Council has recently amended the ordinance code to
allow use of this typP,of open space to allow variations in the front111,
yard setbacks.
2. Conditional Exception No. 72-99 shall be come null and void unless
conditions of approval for Administrative Review No. 72-149 are complied
with.
AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS,ADMINIST.RATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-149
WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
lz Applicant to relocate the open space area along the alley to the
interior property line. Said area shall be enclosed with a 6 ft.„
high masonry wall along the common property line and parallel with
the alley except within 5 ft. of'the corner in which case said wall
shall step down to 42 inches.
2. A revised plot plan to be submitted to th e
prior to issuance of building . permits.
3. Administrative Review .No. 72-149 . to become
amends development ~standards applicable to
. Administrative Review No. 72-14.9 will be
standards in effect at the time building
Board of Zoning Adjustments
null'and void if the city
the area.'
subject to development
permits are issued.
turning