The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1972150 - Supporting DocumentsNOTICE OF ACTION IRQNMENTAL REVIEW BOARD-46" PROJECT NUMBER: V 2-DATE REVIEWED: 11-29-72 PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION:u ex lots 13 15. Block 220 town lot) (Fowler Development Co.) PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS: 213 20th Street In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding imple- mentation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (speci' fically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code ), the E.I.R. Review Committee has reviewed the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report material s ubmitted in request for Exemption Declaration -status for the above described project and hereby recommends : (check one) 0 I. That the Interim Short Form Environmental Impact Report submitted is insufficient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental signifi - cance of this project and the project sponsor is therefore requested tn,- res hmi t a:: aware, thorough E_nvi roan ntal Shor t Form covering the following i nformation: EJ 2. That the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environ- ment and has not been covered adequately i n a previously approved Short Form Environmental I:apact Report . Exemption Declaration status therefore cannot be granted for this project and an Environmental Impact study is thereby required to be submitted to this department and the City shall prepare an E.I.R. prior to the project's approval, The significant environmental impacts which may result from this project include--but may not be limited to--the following: fl 3. That the proposed project cannot , or will not , have a significant effect on the environment . Exemption Declaration Status is therefore granted for this project and the submittal of an Environmental Impact Statement± is thereby not necessary. 4. That even though the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment , the project i s a lesser included part of another project which has previously been exempted or for which an Environmental Impact Report has previously been prepared , provided that the project and E.I.R. was approved and covers the specific environmental impacts of the lesser project. (In this cased the previous project and statement should be noted.) 5. That even though the proposed project is a part of a larger existing established use of land which may have or has had a significant affect on the env i ronment , the proposed project,'when considered alone, contributes an insignificant impact on the environment therefore dexemptioneclaration status is granted. I 2110 MAIN STREET . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 (714) 536-6581 W. E."FOSTu4 VICE PRESIDENT-GENERAL' MANAGER December 19, 1972 City of Huntington Beach Board of Zoning Ad,J,ustments Post' Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Attention; Mr. James W. Palin Gentlemen; Street Section in the City of Huntington Beach, County of The Huntington Beach Company agrees to comply with all City Ordinance requirements regarding dedication and improvement of streets and allies at the time of their development of Lots 5, 7, 14 and 16 in Block 220 of Huntington Beach, Seventeenth Orange, State of California. h Minutes : H. B.,Board of Zoning Adjustments Wedilesday, December 13, 1972 Page 8 4r.Palin stated that the Board of Zoning Adjustments does not feel the open space is usable with a wall around it,'as shown. The Board suggests providing a gate and a 6 ft. wall to within five feet of the corner and then step down to 42'] This accomp - lished the turning radius in the alley and'on sila-. The applicant was advised that the project is within the moratorium area. The` Cfhairman closed the public hearing. < ON MOTION BYPALIN SECOND BY SPENCER, CON]ITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-99 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW ,G CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE-, 1. The 48 inchtwall as shown on the plan shall be constructed: With material compatible with tree unit. The reason for this. ,;requirement is that the City C until has recently amended the, ;ordinance code to allow use crf this type of open space to 'allow variation`s ili, the fr o it Yard setbacks. 2. Conditional Exception No..72-99 shall become null and void unlessconditions''of a.ppoval for Administrative Review No. 72-149 are complied with'. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Sponcer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECQ1ND BY'`;.LIPPS ADMINISTRATI.`IE REVIEW NO. 72-1.49 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FALLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:? 1. Applicant to elocate the open space area along the alley to the interior property line.` Said area shall be enclosed with a 6 ft. highrmas.onry wall along the common property line and parallel With the alley, except within 5 ft. of the 'corner -in' which case/said wall shall step down to 42 inches. 2, A revised plot plan to be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments prior to issuance of,: building permits . 3. Admini1strative Review No. 72-149 to become null and void if the city amends development standards applicable to the area. 4. Adinistrative Review No. 72-149 will be subject to develop meet standards in effect at the time.b,.ui.lding permits are issued. 5. ;Applicant to provide a min imum of 25 ft '.,turning radius for the two open parking spaces off the alle`,, AYES: Lipps,Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None 'CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-100 in con.`uncti MINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-150 imately 180 ft. north of Walnut Avenue in the R4 High Density 'Conditional Exception No. 72-100 is a request to permit the con- struction of a 4 ft. high patio enclosure wall to be located within,the,front yard setback in lieu of S. 9234 of the Ordinance Code. Subject property is located on the west side of 20th Street approx Ordinance Code. Administrative Review No.,72-150 is a request to permit the con- struction' of a four-plea building pursuant to S., 9231.6 of the Applicant: Fowler Development Co. Residential District. Minutes: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 13, 1972 Page 9 4. Administrative Review No. 72-150 will be subject to develop meat standards in effect t the time building permits are issued. Applicant to provide a minimum of 25 ft. turning radius for the two open parking spaces off the alley.. The Chairman opened the public hearing on Conditional l xcept ion No. 72-100. Messrs. Fowler and Bill Wonacott were present representing the applicant. The Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY SPENCER CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.. 72-100 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE; 1. The 48 inch wall as shown on the plan shall be corn . cted with material compatible with the unit. The reason tor this requirement is''':hat the City Council has recently amended the ordinance code to allow use of this type of open space to allow variations in the front yard setbacks. 2. Conditional Exception No. 72-100 shall become null and void unless conditions of approval for Administrative Review No. 72-150 are complied with. AYES: Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PALIN SECOND BY LIPPS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 721;150 WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 2. A revised plot plan to be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments prior to i ssuance of building; permits- 3. Administrative Review No. 72-150'to become null and void if the city amends development standards applicable to the area. which case said wall strati s tep down to v2 cs. parallel with the alley except within 5 ft. of the corner in 1. Applicant to relocate the open space area along the alley to the interior property line. Said area shall be enclosed with a 6 ft. high masonry wall along the common property line and AYES:" Lipps, Palin, Spencer NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINXSTRATIV ' REVIEW NO. 72-1.39 Applicant: Ch ries Hermansen Mr. Charles Hermansen,ipp 'cant, was present. /. Residential District. Administrative Re .iew No.. 72-139 ys a request to permit the con- struction of a four unit apartmetit pursuant to S. ,=9231.6 of the ordinance code on pr , erty lopated'on the east side of 10th Street approximately 155 ft, outh ,,$f Wal nut Avenue in the R4 High Density Mr. Jim Palm stated' that the pen space meets the criteria estab- lished and all set auks are ok. 1"f Minutes: H.R Board of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, December 27, 1972 Page' 11 3. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot, plan, shall be constructed within the project. 4_ All applicable City Ordinances 4hall be complied with.a AYES: McFarland, Lovejoy, Patin NOES: None ABSENT: ' None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-148, H'ia no amut% licant: To permit con5,truction In Conjunction With J. !Ibll. of an,industrial ` building pursuant to CONDITIONAL EXCEPTIN NO' 72-103 Applicant: Kaino Hamu To permit zero side y^d setback in lieu o f the required 15 ft. as per S. 9513".3;N located ''on the west side of Commerce Street approximatel 7 261,,ft, north of Research Street in a 100-M1 -A-20.000 di ,s rict. The hearing was o ened to tY audience on the conditional , exception application. There was no on present to ren _.`resent the applicant. The Board ind'6ated they would n6 0d building plans for the facility and, he plot plans were skhort six parking spaces. They further reviewed fencing and l ndscapirg for the project. REVIEW NO. 72-;L48 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 72-103 WERE CONTINUED TO JANUARY 3, 1973 TO ALLOW TH STAFF TIME TO CONTACT 1E APPLICANT BY THE FOLLOWING, ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: McFarland, Lovejoy, Palin T? r-- l.:e r.v -C'urt'he rnRtm.n,r,. _.,f++e:' -}i.n r.n c. .e+7 rtsoc1vv....i..v.• y..1 'aL V V L-ai• ;-.'u'i.'raav r- '•,: va- - o' vv=:r a '-: ...-vim ., +." ON MOTION Y P{PLLIN AND SECOND BY LOVEJOY ADMINISTRATIVE NOES:1 None ABSENT:/ None MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW and NO. 72-149 RevisedPlot Plans ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-150 - Revised Plot Plans Applicant;i Fowler Develo ment Co'. The Board`'reviewed the plans and discussed turning "radius for park rg spaces off the alley in the Townlot area. It was noted'that all parking spaces taking access from an alley are=' subject .to a Mull 25 ft. turning radius. REVIEW NO. 72-150 WERE APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING` ROLL CALL ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BYMCFARLAND THE REVISED PLANS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-149 AND= ADMIN"ISTRATIVE 1, i