HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1973125 - Supporting DocumentsNOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 73 125 (Continued from 8/1/73 )
" pplicarit:..Richar"d S encer
To permit the - -nstruction of a 2 story, 11,;,000 sq. ft,
professional -wilding pursuant to S.9401 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code located on the south side of Warner
Avenue approximately 750 ft. east of Bolsa Chi a Road in
an R5 office professional district.
Mr. Richard Spencer was present.
The Acting Secretary stated that Exemption Declaration No. 73-158
was approved July 31, 1973 by the Environmental Review Board with
no stipulations.
The plans were discussed and the applicant was informed that
plans indicated a shortage of five parking spaces. The
applicant concurred with Board for a continuance to allow
time to revise plans. It was suggested that applicant review
Article 979.
ON MOTION BY GERARDEN AND SECOND BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW NO. 73-125 WAS CONTINUED TO AUGUST 15, 1973 FOR THE
FOLLOWING REASON,, AND BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
To allow applicant time to submit revised plans in conformance
with Ordinance Code , with said plans to depict use of each
portion of the building.
Jta. e d L F a 4 aILi JGda 11V }-Yu ti LLLLf -. .{LaJL. L'' V ---£Z-£L 'OBI Q TI 3O NOISIAICIu IM1uo oun Cuoj ul'3oT.i STp TVT snpuTv- TW up uz auv7 2.Dnpoad u2 aAT.zJMoanasa}4e.1a Oo qsVG-qq Ou at44 uo pag2001 apoD uPUTpaO-znqq{anagU012U.unH. auj JoT.TS6UOT4DGS o; ;uuns:znd 13ItTa;snp' . -q.4 `bso00 `tTu ;o uocjona;suoo auq 41waad' oi;sOT.z4snPUIITTH XOdaupDTT vZZT-£L ON MaIA3L! 3AI,ILV LSININQVaTPugauONauoN`a.aouad5 'uap va.af:INTSffdS3ONS3xv9 a2Bd£L61 `8a.sn2tiv 'kepsaupoMs'.uatu;snCpv futuoz jMC,P,-jpOq• q •H : sa4nuTwJ Lned developmentsn clause (9310.46)ri buildings.6. Is not detrimental to health and tvelfare of the peoplein the adjoining area.unitssacrificing the concept of detached ingle familyI LL y{.a t.c 1J1 UjJVJCLJ. LU Li t .L ULCq-,LV-N[ly L.USIJ L.I UL, L.:'J11is l attempt to satisfy Code requi ements whileoposal meets the intent and purpose o- Article 931achieving detached planned rievelopmen s.Proposal is consistent with rtl:expreviously approved under th 'Xc4regarding reduction in distarl"
pauuaZd a::>t.i;sTp•pAig uoEag;ozssaapes q .nos aqq uo paar{I. JO6t'OI£6'Snazi u sfuxp1Tnq uTE1 I.uap-csa1 AZTSUGp MOT'Ud-17uz4,4 06-t AIajrwT)coadd-e • 1(I puEi' o oEaoi apoa. aousuTp,to -qovag uogfftgY nHsv •q SZ ;o uinur uzu paitnbax o1 2. ouaaM .aq uoT;viedas •;Oizuiiad oyagaM/Iaiuva uE3riddypanut .uo0) T£°£L 'ON NOI,Ld30Xa {IVNOIZIGNOOaipraauoNauoNuap.IE.zaE.1NSdONSLAVS aid,SL'£L6T `$SnndW .(EpsaupaM`•i'v1114snl'PVVUTUOZ 0.o p.iEOg',Ti1Isoa.nuTWThere followed" discussion o the revised plans. Mr. Feltmanstated that Fo Hillludustrie operates a brass foundry whichhas maximum c acity of%500 lb units. Landscaping was dis-cussed.The conditi ns of approval were di cussed.ON MOTION Y GERARDEN AND 'SECOND BY PENCER ADMINISTRATIVEREVIEW NO. 73-12? WAS APPROVED WITH T E FOLLOWING CONDITIONSAND BY T E FOLLOhING VOTE:TO BE C MPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE.OF BUT ING PERMITS:1. Th revised plot plan rece 't `ugust 8`,1973 shall beth , approved layout as amended.2. A revised elevation shall be submitted to e Board ofZoning Adjustments for Approval Action shoig wall onProduct Avenue.
, I ,
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD 7NG ADJUSTMENTS
Aeinistrative Annex
TO BE COMPLETED' PRIOR TO'.ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
The revised plot,:lan received August.15, 1973,
the approved layout as amended.
shall be
Warner Avenue and Leslie Avenue shall be dedicated to
standards at the time each parcel is developed.
WEDNESDAY, A GUST 15,
I-)3 Main Street
+ntington Beach, California
73 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS SE T: Eadie , Leyva;:;Gerarden
BOARD MEMBERS ABS None
REGULAR AGENDA EMS:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 737125,
A licant:",, Richard S encer
To permit the construction of a 2-'story, 11,000 sq . ft. profes-
sional building pursuant to S.9401 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code, located on the south side of Warner Avenue
approximately 750 ft . east of BolsaChica Road in an R5 Office-
Professional District.
Richard Spencer, applicant, was present.
The Acting Secretary stated that Exemption Declaration No. 73-138
had been approved by the Environmental Review Board. The revised
plans were reviewed, at which time parking revisions, driveway
widths, and berm planting were discussed. The Board reviewed the
conditions of approval with the applicant.
ON MOTION BY GERARDWN AND SECOND BY EADIE ADMINISTRATIVE'REVIEW,-
NO. 73-125 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND BY THE
FOLLOWING;; 6LL CALL VOTE:
Elevations of ,,-the proposed plan,shall be submitted to the
Board of Zonin 44 Adjustmentsfor'review and approval action.
The water , sewer , aLy fire hydrant system shall: be approved
1by the Department c ,i.blic Works and Fire Department.
All buildings on lots abutting a City' easement shall be
set---back five (5) feet from the edge of such easement.
d- j
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
Administrative Annex
523 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
WEDNESDAY, A GUST 15, 73 - 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS SE T: Eadie, Leyva, Gerarden
BOARD MEMBERS ABS None
REGULAR AGENDA EMS:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEN"NO. 73-.125
A licant: Richard Spencer
To permit the construction of a"2-story, 11,000 sq. ft. profes-
sional -building pursuant to S.9401 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code, located on the.south side of Warner Avenue
approximately 750 .ft. east of Bolsa Chica Road in an R5 Office-
Professional District.
Richard Spencer, applicant, was present.
The Acting Secretary stated that Exemption Declaration No. 73-138
had been approved by the Environmental Review Board. The revised
plans were reviewed, at which time parking revisions, driveway
widths, and berm planting were discussed. The Board reviewed the
conditions of approval with the applicant.
ON MOTION BY GERARDWN AND SECOND BY EADIE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 73-125 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND BY THE
FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PFRMITS:
1'. The revised plot plan received August 15, 1973, shall be
the approved layout as amended.
2. Warner Avenue and Leslie Avenue shall be dedicated to City
standards at the. time each parcel is developed.
3. Elevations of the proposed plan shall be submitted to the
Board of Zoning Adjustments for review and approval action.
The water, sewer,-,and: fire hydrant-system, shall be approved
by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department.
All buildings on lots abutting a City easement shall be
set back five (5) feet from the edge of such easement.
Minutes: H. B. Board f Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, August 15, 73
Page 2
6. Soil and compaction reports as required by the Building
Department and the Department of Public Works shall be
submitted to the City.
B. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION:
1. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Depart-
ment for review and approval action..
2. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view.
Said screening plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning
Adjustments
3. All signs for the Proposed Development shall be submitted
to the BZA for approval. Signs shall reflect a common'
theme with respect to design materials and colors which are
compatible with the architectural theme of the proposed
project.
4. Fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be
installed by the developer at locations and to specifica-
tions provided by the Fire Department. '
5. Parking compound shall be screended with a combination of
fencing and la:-ndscapi.ng. Said plan shall be submitted to
the Planning' Department for review and approval. Fencing
and landscape plans shall include the following information:
a. A list including quantities and sizes for each species
of plants and all ground cover material,
b. Irrigation layout to include meter location, pipe sizes,
sprinkler head types, etc.
,c. Fencing materials and detail drawing.
TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION:
1. Warner and Leslie Avenues shall be fully improved including
street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants,
sewer and water main extensions
2. All utilities shall be installed underground.
3. Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979 -
4., There shall be no fence, structure or landscaping constructed
or maintained over 3-1/2 feet high within a 10 ft. by 10 ft.
triangular area at the intersection of driveways and streets
or within ,a 25 ft. by 25 ft. triangular area at the inter-
section of streets
Minutes: TI.4 IF13oard of 'T,on rig Adjus tmcncs
Wednesday , August 15, 1.973
Pare 3
il. TO BE COMPLETED I'I?1cjI TO l;3„UANC 01" CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
I. Water :;uppLy sliriil no trn°uqh the Ci-t.y of Huntington
Beach `:. water. siipply ::ysten1.
?. is r'r'. r :tP'-II- ii ';n J i i tic: City of Huntinzjton
1 tf3cY1 rvi
3. ET&sern .1"1;`_. fs'I ?iti 1. l 1 ;. or "tai :w i?9 shall be provided to
Department r.° T' zk.11 r' uro`. ;,t..adards.
4. The prt pe v y :ih;'aa.l pat i ipatr:' ;1 the local drainage
assessment di str.icct,.
5 No .7true°turos, et-.nor than tiioa ;c shown on the approved
plrot plan, shit.-l3 h en.nnstrueteu within the project.
1All
AYES : t; :rarden, Sf y ra, .%":.
NOES None
ABSENT; None
USE PERM.ET NO7. 73-58,
A plicant: Mountjoy Construction
aILC'c? :5kIiA be complied with.
Company
To pe nit the construction of an 11,960 q . ft. retail commercial
Minutes : Huntington ch Board of Zoning Adjustments
December 18, 1974
Page 7
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Continued):
ADMINISTRATI E
A licant: Richard S encer.
Board review of revised plans for the project, received by the Planning
Department on December 16, 1974.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER D
WERE APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: EADIE SPENCE
OES: ' NONE
ABSENT: NONE r.-
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
Dave Eadie, Chairman and Secretary
Board of Zoning Adjustments
NOTICE OF'ACTION
(ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD
PROJECT NUMBER:ED 73-138'
PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION :
PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS:
(AR 73-125)DATE REVIEWED:July 17, 1973
Professional-Dental Building
5142-5152-5172 Warner Avenue
Huntington Beach, California
In accordance with City of Huntington Beach policies regarding imple-
mentation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (speci-
fically Section 21151 of the Public Resources Cbde), the E.I.R. Review
Committee has reviewed the Interim Short Form-Environmental Impact
Report material submitted in request for Exemption Declaration status
for the above described project and hereby recommends: (check one)
1. That the request for Exemption Declaration status submitted is insuffi -
cient to facilitate a decision as to the environmental significance of
this project and the project sponsor is therefore requested to resubmit
a more thorough Environmental Short Form covering the following informa -
tion:
D 2. That the proposer?`project may have a significant effect on the environ-
ment and has not been covered adequately in a previously approved request
for. exemption declaration status. Exemption declaration status therefore
cannot be granted for this project and an environmental impact study is
thereby required to be submitted to this department and the City shall
repare an Environmental Impact Report prior to the project's approval.
The significant environmental impacts which may result from this project
include--but may not be limited to--the following:
3. That the proposed project cannot, or will not, have a significant effect
on the environment. Exemption Declaration status is therefore granted
for this project and the submittal of an environmental impact study is
thereby not necessary.
® 4. That even though the proposed project may have a significant effect on
the environment, the project is a lesser included part of another
project which has previously been exempted or for which an EnvironmentalImpact Report has previously been prepared,'provided that the project
and Environmental Impact Report were approved. and covers the specific
environmental impacts of the lesser project. (In this case, the project
and statement should be noted..)
D S. That even though the proposed project is a part of a larger existingestablished use of land which may have or has had a significant affect
on the environment, the proposedpr,ojects when considered alone,
contributes an insignificant impact on the environment therefore
Exemption Declaration status is granted.
APPROVED:
Environmental
