Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1973155 - Signed ApplicationBOARD It UST N T I HCITY OF HUNTNG TON BEAC, Aroli,.tnt or Authtrri,e. Agent 2 a//114n4'c2, j Kxtilittf AddreKS '',5Gr Board Action Date:A I O approved Conditionally Approved 0 Denied 0 Withdrawn 0 Refereed to P. C. Appealed ; Yes 0 No 0 rW/a14 PURSUANT TO:. LOCATION OF PROPERTY& City of Huntington Beach PLANNING DEPARTMENT P. 0, Box 190 `tiuntinglun Beach, Calif. 92648 Ptil: (714) 536.5271 TYPE D1+ PETITION S FEE I ke I'ertnlt 25.00 s'r+nr4itiuns! hxcepur,n 25,00 Not Plan Amendment 25.00 A.)rr I traOye Review £0.00 Division of Land 10.00 CJ Ownership verification L1 Letter of Authorization Comtt+irsion Action Date: 17 Sustained BZA 0 Conditionally Apprgved O Approved 0 Withdrawn 0 Referred back to BZA Appealed: Yes 0 No 0 CASE NUMBER UP . CE a PPA -- AR `>- DV - pjG 1973 'pNNltiGDtPt. (Date filed) PPA Previous Case: 1- Street Address:9' /3 S M .2; Side of street? 'AWN-LV1 :\1 Irv; 3. Distance from nearest intersecting street: 4. Name of nearest intersecting street: LEGAL DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION: (Fill in completely; attacb additional sbeets if necessary) AR PPAt State reasons for this request and length of time requested for use. 3 -'Block Township ii 1. Lot Section , dam'®, £3 ' c®® ,vt4 t.' vJ DV: Give legal descripsiorn of each parcel in the proposed division and/or consolidation: o] I.rtar^i ,; and .,.•r ,......,.... - r;T' , ,„I e.p 1`1111 .11 O State reasons why the, establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use or building applied for will not be detri- mental to: 1) the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity , or 2) injurious to property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. The objective of a conditional exception is to achieve parity and not to grails special privilege. When considering properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification, please respond to the following: 1. What exceptional circumstances apply to petitioned property (including size, shape, topography, location or surtoundinga) that deprive y of privileges normally" enjoyed? 2. Will the Conditional Exception constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations? ,1. "p cys t Whir is ,chla Co d,a o eat t etsei©e aae asaray dir the prexereracuaav and enjoyment of one or more substantial'y sr 4, State reasons why the granting of this Ci rE y itinnal Exception. will stirs be materially detrimental to the public nave rvmi and understand .,Q •mints including the Supplement-to-! :ut,Fn on rho reverse side of this application . Under perjury of lass Ida herein affirm chart th roow r rh ` dt uth szed Agent