HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1973204 - Supporting DocumentsTo 1'dhclr It. fray Cnno,ern;
1 ,'J 31 13th ;:r t r e e t
b,insat hqa-b, colifornia
Nrivcii.x;er 1, 1973
I , .J.ly ar Nra5h, t t",? C nF !r -" )b`, appoint 'rind 'Auth,.Srizti,
John S' A our , t'ie bua .. Iat t i , ao, ;,-y rigent ani.For thGur
au thorl ri him to act rn ,Try rho f" in transecti ni.h Wines", air. nin S
fCJI'mo v ich an Us Permit opollcntion.'a, v,nvirronrtwnte'II Itnp,f;t Rt,,pat''
bhort f ?I'11is, otf,'., nvvt? rythi_nr'} rn uirnd for the t'rr)nstI'u t? cn of a
12575 w ;pare NO building t_ b!: ?ocatrrd at 6041 i:oisa Av,v3.,
Ruatinc mn Beach, Cal Varnia Yo'i co-operation shall too appre gated,,
Yours 'ory truly,
r ob. 276 19° 4
joba
5m raft Uxtvo
pastes um"h, CA
p"r Jabal
Ted s to to aafIrs ,t I to q , e or*3 wolm a p - $t ate, pf
on the 'B1 lot", NO, "ter as that Us tom ma. .o
to socov ' j d not • t to goty of t1 prooft t t .ota $A tw o ro e eater £ t to a p
to put -0 t to;;a thr . Or Ttmpom of 0634061 wr Um WI"
iAftklod so tat 1% MS Vaoft tthe bdIdW t be t t
for t t t he ov4U a $00. 1 work to to bo stoppc aA not
to be rta vgau wa fts IV sum t oo 't
C TY OF HU T INGTON BEA CH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
Dave Eadie From D. Ferguson 01
Subject AR 73-204 Date November 14, 1973
At its meeting the 13RB referred the applicant on this
request to the BZA, to set up an informal meeting with staff to
go over his plans.
Areas of concern were: buffer landscaping zone between the project
and t ) nearby res'.dential, treatment and location of the trash
areas, no indication of the architectural treatment (elevations?),
no itdic.ta.on of signing to match signs already in the commercialarea, possible conflicts in the traffic patterns (angular parking
as opposed to 900 arki.n , conflict caused b y Douglas traffic,how are the parkin areas related to the res t of the' commercial poperyout there.) Is it One property so that development can be coordin-
ated, or is it two properties?
Board also discussed a traffic study for the project, but came to
no definite decision on whether or not they would ask' for ore,
(Applicant has been instructed to get in touch with you.)
V
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH. BOARD O1 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS ,
Administrative Anne}:
523 Main Street
Huntington beach, Calif.
WEDNESDAY , DECEMBER 19, 1973 - 1:15 P.M.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Gerarden , Eadie, Ford
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: None
MINUTES : ON MOTION BY FORD AND SECOINTD BY GERARDEN MINUTES OF
NOVEMBER 21, 1973, NOVEMBER 28, 197 3, DECEMBER 5, 1973
WERE ACCEPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Gerarden , Eadie, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
AGENDA ITEMS CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 73-204
AMlacant: John St. Amour
To permit the constructr .oA of a 12,000 sq. ft. commercial building
pursuant tc S.9430 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code located
on the north side of Balsa Avenue appro x imately 150 ft . east of
Springdale Street in the C-2, community business district.
The Acting Secretary informed the Board that a continuance was in
order to allow applicant time to allow a 10 day posting period
of Exemption Declaration No. 73-204. Applicant concurred with
continuance,
ON MOTION BY HADIE AND SECOND BY GERARDEN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 73-204 WAS CONTIN UED TO JANUARY 2,1974 BY THE FOLLOWING V OTE:
AYES: Gerarden , Eadie, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
AD 1INISTRATZVE REVIEW No . 73-196 (Cont. from 12/12/73)
l , .scant: Colw 1 & Pa chitect
To, ermit the conat ctio of a drive-in restau r ant pursuant
to S.9430 of the Win ng+hn Beach Ordinance Code locateU on, 'the
west side of Srookhur t Street, approximatley 500 ft. south of
Car iel in a C-2, 0- U ,ty busirzeas district
Minutest A.B. ZoardAbf Zoning Adustments
Wednesday, Januar; h 974
'Page 2
ON MOTION BY EADIE AND SEC D BY FORD CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO .
73-66 WAS CONTINUED TO J LIARY 23, 1974 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTF" -
AYES: Spencer, Ea ie, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMIX STRATIVE VIEW NO. 73 -204 (Cont. from 12/19/73)
A licant:' John St. Amour
TkTw 4':"_„.P3 :"7i k3 v ?ttF' X4 ',1!
To permit the construction of a. 12,000 sq. ft . commercial
building pursuant to 5.9430 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code located on the north side of Bolsa Avenue
approximately 150 ft. east of Springdale Street in the
C-2, community business district.
Mr. St. Amour , the applicant , was present.
The Ac t ing Secretary informed the Board that this application
had been previously contin ued for .finalization of the Environmental
requirements . He further stated that the Environmental Review
Board granted Exemption Declaration No. 73-216 January 2, 1974
with the following additional information:
Architectural design and materials have been proposed which
are compatible with the existing deve'.opment , buffers have
been provided over and across the existing property to the
subject project, satisfactory sig.i ing has been planned, and
ilia applicant has pursued the relocation of the building
-co eliminate the periphery drive which was adjacent to the
rear yards of the abutting single -family residences. Treatment
of the trash areas has also been satisfactorily resolved.
The Acting Secretary outlined the proposal to the Board. Board
discussed plans with applicant . The moving of a wall and replacing
it with berming and the relocation of driveways were also discussed.
Mr. St. Amour discussed the sign theme to be used as signs containing
a white background with blue lettering,
Board discussion followed.
Conditions of approval were discussed.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY EAI?IE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 73-204 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED
AND AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE
TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PE
The rev ised plot plan received 11/12/73 shall uo the approved
layout as amended.
Minutes: H.B. B oard of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, Janu 2, 1974
Page 3 El
2. A revised Pi, t Plan shall be submitted to the Board
of Zoning Adjustments for Approval Action. Said plan
shall reflect the relocation of the easterly driveway
and rearrangement of the parking spaces displaced by
the rearrangement.
3. Bolsa Avenue shall be dedicated to City standards
at the time each parcel is developed.
4. Elevations of the proposed plan shall be submitted, to
the Board of Zoning Adjustments for review and approval
action.
5. The water , sewer , and fire hydrant system shall be
approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire
Department.
6. All buildings on lots abutting a City easement shall be
set back five (5) feet from the edge of such easement.
7. Soil and compaction reports as required by the Building
Department and the Department of Public Works shall be
submitted to the City.
B. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION:
1. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Board of
Zoning Adjustments for review and approval action.
2. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from
view. Said screening plan shall be approved by the
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
3. All signs for the Proposed Development shall be submitted
to the BZA for approval. The BZA encourages signs which
reflect a common theme with respect to design materials and
colors which are compatible with the architectural theme
of the proposed project.
4. Fire alarm system conduit and appurte.,ances shall be
installed by the developer at locations and to specifi-
cations provided by the Fire Department.
5. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination
of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for review and approval.
Fencing and landscape plans shall include the following
information:
a. A list including quantities and sizes for each species
of plants and all ground cover material.
b. Irrigation layout to include meter location, pipe
sizes, sprinkler head types, etc,
c. Fencing materials and detail drawing.
Minutes; H.B. Board t Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, January 2, 1974
Page 4
TO BE C014PLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION:
1. Bolsa Avenue shall be fully improved including street
trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants,
sewer and water main extensions.
2. All utilities shall be installed underground.
3,, Off-street parking facilities shall conform to Article 979.
4. A masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and
east property line. The height of said wall shall be such
that the top will be six (6) feet above the highest ground
surface within twenty (20) feet of the common property
line. Except within the 42 inch in which case the height
of said wall shall be reduced to 42 inches.
5. There shall be no fence, structure or landscaping
constructed or maintained over 3 1/2 feet high within
a 10 ft. by 10 ft. triangular area at the intersection
of driveways and streets or within a 25 ft. by 25 ft.
triangular area at the intersection of streets.
6. A lighting system shall be install ed within the project
equal in illumination to lighting on, public streets.
Lighting system shall be shi e,lded to reflect away from
adjoining properties and streets.
D. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY :
1. Water supply shall be though the City of Huntington
Beac h's water supply system.
2, Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington
Beach's sewage system.
3. Easements for utilities or walkways shall be provided
1-o Department of Public Works standards.
4. The property shall participate in the local drainage
assessment district.
No structures , other than those shown on the approved
plot plan, shall be constructed within the project.
6 All applicable City Ordinances shall he complied with.
AXES: Spencer ', Sadie, Ford
NOES,. None
ABSENT None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 73-21$
A licant: Miller & Wearer
REV .SED PLANS d ELEVATIONS
DAT90 1-14-74
COND'.'ION A-1I
The Board discussed the revised plans and el evati oi , and found them
to be within ordinance code requirements.
ON MOTION BY GERARDEN 7xND SECOND BY EADIE REVISED PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
DATED 1-14-74 WERE APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Gerarden, Eadie, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 73--204
A licant: John St. Amour
REVISED PLOT PLAN DATED 1-15-74
CONDITION A-1
7tja.4 al U.Al&94w L U e;J 40C J Ott
paxiribax -14 t ==U* t A44o;uT 4u0tnt ^ 190aoua
US 4VQ4;, 0,V 01
LI TWS '' 9OfX$ : gUVOTT V
T-V1 "ON CIOIsdsog 'IVNOIIIaNO'D
auo&k LNaseveuot 'S90 N
pxo3 'sTpeS , " . epxsxa saxv
6 a£red
t'L61 9 -Uri ' AupSaUpeM
s-4uew,srtCpy.bu,ruoZ go pxz . . fl : sa4nui w
I ,:3 w U Dar q Uz
Minutes; H.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, Jan. 16, 1974
Page 11
The Board discussed the revised plans and elevations, and found
them to be within ordinance code requirements.
ON MOTION BY EADIE AND SECOND BY FORD REVISED PLOT PLAN DATED
1-15-74 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Gerarden, Eadie, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
App 'cant: Huntington Beach High School Traffic and Safety
Education De artment
The Actin Secretary presented a request for a special permit
through the ity Adminis_trato_r's _Offas;e
HDNTINGT BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL RESO S SECTION
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
TO:DATE:
Santa Ana, California 92702
Negative Declaration No. 74-1 Application or Permit No. ED 73-216
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FOR WHICH THIS NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREPARED:
Small commercial building
PROJECT LOCATION'/ADDRESS:
6441 Bolsa Avenue, Huntington Beach, California
Pursuant to the proc e dure s of the City of Huntington Beach for implement*-
Trion of the California Environmental Quality Act of 197 0 the Environmental
!Resources Section has reviewed the preliminary environmental description
data and information on the environmental setting , of the proposed projec
as submitted by the project sponsor and does hereby find;
That the proposed project will not have a significan t (substantial
adverse) effect on the environment,Architect ural design
Brief statement of reasons to Support findin s:materials have been pro*
posed which are compatible with the existing development, b r ded
over and across the existing property to tie subject project,satisfactory sinning
has been planne , an e app ican as pursue e re oce. ion o e U 1 g -
eliminate the, eriphery drive- which was adjacent to the rear yards of the abutt n
single-f ami.y rest. ences. _eatmen o re ras areas as a so aresolved.
o negative Declaration is therefore granted for this project and thopreparation of an Environmental Impact Report is thereby not T:aesa*
That even though the proposed project may have an .adverse effect onEthen environment, the proje ct is a lesser part of another project for
which an Environmental Impact Report has previously been prepared ar,that the original project and ETR were approved, and also that no
substantial environmental changes are proposed which will require
major revisions of the original SIR.
Erei,ef statement of reasons to support findings*.
Nogative Declaration is therefore granted for this project and the
preparation of a subsequent Environmental. Trpact Report is thereby
not necos;s ry.
Apptoved by bata -January,
James W. Pa i , Secretary - Environmental Review Board