Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1974008 - Supporting Documentsco ental service company 1335 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE - LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 • 740-5351 mcf.wFED t ,;14 PLANNING DEPT. I January 15, 1974 City of Huntington Beach Board of Zoning Adjustments Gent lemen: The firm of Tom & Truskier Architects have been retained by this firm for professional services in regards to construction at the Spriijgdale-Edinger Office of the Bank of America. As Architects for this firm, they are authorized tc; represent us at Planning, Zoning, City Council, and similar meetings. Yours very truly, CONTINENT SERVICE iIPANY LLTAM RETD, A.I.A Assistant Secretary WAIT : kl iffil* 11 "Minutes: 11.13. Boar of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, Feb. 6, 1974 e 8 residential district. CONDITIO L BXCEPTlO .S NO. 73-66 (Cont . from 1/23/74) Applicant : uy W. Gardner To permit a zor , -ear yard setback for carports i e construction of a proposed 12 unit artment complex in lieu of .91 'J3.3 of the Huntington Deach Ordi, nce Code located on th. outheast corner of Huntington_ Avenue an . 17th Street in an z, medium density The Chairman informed the Boar- thatAtYe Environmental Review Board ~!as not finalized Exemption Der_la Ion No. 73-231 relating to Jse Permit No. 73-88 and Conditi xception No. 73-66 and further proposed a continuance to alto pplic' t to meet environmental concerns. ON MOTION BY EADIE AND S '6ND BY SPENCER USE RMIT NO. 73-88 WAS CONTINUED TO FEBRU 27, 1.974 BY THE FOLLO . G VOTE: AYES: Eadie, Scer, Ford NOES: None ABSENT: Non ON MOTI . SADIE AND SECOND BY SPENCER CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 7'-66 AS CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 27, 1974 BY THE FOLLOWING VOT AYES/ Eadie, Spencer, Ford NOE None ENT: None___ -- To permit the alteration and addition to an existing bank pursuant to 5.9430 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code located on the east side of Springdale, appro dmatoly 130 ft. north of Edinger in a C-2, community business district. :ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-8 'A Icant.: Richard L, Tom, A.I.A. Mr. Truskier, representing the applicant, was present. hc:a Chairman informed the Board that this application is a caategorical exemption, class 1, C4,ltfornia Environmontal Quality Act, 1970. I The applicant outlined the proposal to the Board. Removal of sevoral parking stalls to help circulation of vehicles was discuss td. Minuted k1 t Ca+ 1"( id' ' 1;S?...; A just.me Ci Weclnc sday, Fel,. 6, 19 12 Page 9 Thy. applicant's representative was unable to discuss the plans further, and it was the consensus of the Board to continue this application for a representative to be present that will be able to discuss and make amendments to the plan. In addition, it was suggested that a meeting between the applicant's representative and the staff be set up and that the applicant submit revised plans. ON MOTION BY EADIE AND SECOND BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-3 WAS CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 20, 1,974 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES; NOES: ABSENT: Eadie, Spencer, Ford None None: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO, 74-12 Appliant : C. Louis Graziadio III To permit t he construction of a model complex pursuant t 5.9730.1 .8 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code locat on the northwest corner of Warner and Sims in an R-3, h' densit y residential district. Mr, John Johnson , representing the applicant , was p esent. The Ch 'rman informed the Board that the En Iro ental Review Board gr, ted Exemption Declaration No. ,f7 50 ay 22, 1973. Board discus --d plans with applicant./-"T - applicant's representative tated that the propge model homes would be a short term p- jest. Board discussion foil qed. Conditions of approval we scussed. ON MOTION BY EADIE AND , OND Y SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74.12 WAS APPROVED ITII THE LLOWING CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED AND AMENDEDA Y HE FOLLO6 G VOTE: 1.Plot Plan rya 1vud January 28, i97 shall be the approvedrl gout. 2.Lot 2 unti is V not be issued a certifi cate o occupancy s ; time as the units have been sci 'a the on re igns shall be reviewed by the Buildi ind. shall compl y with Article 976. 4. Al,I parts of 5.9730.18 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance shall be complied with relating to this site. MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Admirxistrati, Ann 523 Main Meet Hunting n B_adch, Calif. WEDNESDAY BRUARY 20, 1974 - 1:15 P.M. BOARD,MEMBERS P.ENT: Eadie, en r, Ford BOARD BERS ABSENT; No OTHER CI Y DEPARTMENT MEM R Calf ain Vanderlaan, REPRESEN D ire Department MINUTES: ON TION Y ENCER AND 'COND BY FORD MINUTES OF FEBRUA 6 1974 WERE ACCEP D BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ABSENT: one NOES: AYES: E 1 5,4 Spe er, Ford GEN ITEMS CONTINUED OR WITH WW: NE REGULAR A 40 . ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-8 (Cont. from 2/6/74) A li.;ant: Richard L . Tom, A.I.A. To permit the alteration and addition to an existing bank pursuant to S.9430 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code lcoated on the east side of Springdale, approximately 130 ft. north of Edinger in a C-2, community business district. Mr. Truskier and Mx. Tom kitchen, representing the applicant, were present. The Chairman informed the Board that this application is a categorical exemption, Class 1, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. The Chairman outlined the revised plot plan to the Board. Additional landscaping along Springdale Avenue was discussed as well as the construction of a wall to preclude vision of parking from Springdale. The applicant's representatives indicated that no additional signs are to be erected, however, one wall sign will be moved from one location to -Another. Minutes: H.B. Board o oning Adjustments Wednesday, February 20, 1974 Page 2 The Secretary expressed his concerns that any future expansion of this sho, ing center shall require complianc e to creating of the site applicable at that time. Board discussion followed. Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY EADIE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-8 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED AND AMENDED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 1. The revised plot plan received 2/9/74 shall be the approved layout as amended. 2. The water, sewer, and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 3. All buildings on lots abutting a City easement shall be set back five (5) feet from the edge of such easement. 4. Soil and compaction reports as required by the Building Department and the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the City. 5. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. Said screening plan shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. B. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION: 1. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval action. 2. Additional signs for the proposed development shall be limited to wall signs only. The BZA encourages sign; which reflect a common theme with respect to design materials and colors which are compatible with the architectural theme of the proposed project. 3. Fire alarm system conduit and appurtenances shall be installed by the developer at locations and to specifi- cations provided by the Fire Department. 4. Parking compounds shall be screened with a combination of fencing and landscaping. Said plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. Fencing and landscape plans shall include the following information: a. A list including quantities and sizes for each species of plants and all ground cover material. 0Minutes: H,B. oard of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, February 20, 1974 Page 3 b. irrigation layout to include meter location. pipe sizes, sprinkler head types, etc. c. Fencing materials and detail drawing. C. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION: 1. Springdale Avenue shall be fully improved including street trees, street signs, street lights, fire hydrants, sewer and water main extensions. 2. All utilities shall be installed underground. D. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 1. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's water supply system. 2. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 3. The property shall participate in the local drainage assessment district. 4. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within.the project. 5. All applicable City Ordinances shall be complied with. AYES: Eadie , Spencer, Ford NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 73-219 (Cont. from 2/13/74) A licant: Gerald A. Jones p it the construction of a 2,900 sq. ft. ware ursuant to r f the Huntington Beach Ordinance Co o ed'on the south si e later Avenue, approximated _,0 . east of Gothard in an Ml-CD, fig ustrial -civic 'str' . Mr. Jones, the applicant, s p en The Chairman informed the a t the ' onmental Review Board granted Exemption e aration 73-229 er 18, 1973. The Chairman Furth informed the Board that a an check reveale the plan to be i n ordinance code requirements . he Board establi .shed_,§e proposal as being a warehouse instead an industrial buildin w J.Ark Minutes: H.B. Board of Zoning Wednesday, February 27, 1974 Adjustments ge 18 AYES: Eadie,Spencer, Ford NOES: None ABSENT" one The appli nt tlined his proposal to the Board hardship a bein financial having to redraw a stated that the o 'ginal mistake had been mad by and st ted his plan . He th architect and is now u able t have a 20 ft. setback. Alter tives to the proposed lan we discussed. It was the cons nsus of he Board, that ince e structure has not been ere ted yet, hardship d es no exist. Further- .more, it was the onsensus f the Bo d tha this lot would not accomodate the prop sed stru tune a be thin ordinance code; however, devel ment cou d b acco odated. ON MOTION BY FORD AND S `OND BY ENC CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 74-9 WAS DENIED FOR E FO OW REASONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE; 1. The applicant did not d m n rate j stifiable hardship. 2. The land, presently v ca , ould be d veloped to meet ordinance code requi e nts. AYES: Eadie, Spenc , Ford NOES: None ABSENT: None MISCELLANEOUS: ADMINISTRATIVE VIEW NO. 73-111 SIGN 'HEME Condi on A-6 A licant: D Jones Board disc ss d sign theme. The Board has del gated wall si s for that ar icular center. Further wall signs do not have to come ba the Board of Zoning Adjustments. ON M 'IO BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY FORD SIGN THEME AS APPROVED BY IIE F LLOWING VOTE: YES: Eadie, Spencer, Ford NOES None AB NT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-8 SIGN THEME & Condition A-5 A licant: Richard Tom, A.I.A. EQUIPMENT SCREENING PLAN Board discussed equipment screening plan and sign theme and found same to be within ordinance code requirements.