The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1974040 - Supporting DocumentsPage 010 - Council Minutes - 12/10/73 CONSTRUCTION OF SLATER TRU INE SEWER - COUNCIL CONCURREiy RANTED The City Clerk presented a communication from the Orange County $anitatior D tstricts requesting the concurrence of Council relative to the alignment of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer for County Sanitation District #11. This item had been deferred from the i November 5, 1973 meeting so that questions raised by the Environmental Review Board might be answered. A communication from the Environmental Council, with attachments from the Orange County Sanitation Districts and Keith & Associates was presented to Council. On ;notion by Green, Council concurred with the request of the County Sanitation Dis- trict for the location of the Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer for Orange County ``sanitation District 011 in accordance with Section 47951 of the California Health and ,Safety Code The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen : Shipley , Green, Coen , Matney NOES: Councilmen, Norte ABSENT: Councilmen : Bartlett , Gibbs, Duke RE NEST FOR RECOGNITION - COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL - DEFERRED 1 7/74 - (CA 73-131) The City Administrator recommended that the request for recognition by the Community Services Council be deferred to the January 7, 1974 meeting pending a meeting between their group and the United Crusade. On motion by Green, Council approved the recommendation of the City Administrator and directed that the request for recognition by the Community Services Council b e deferrer to thetJanuary 7, 1974 meeting by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Green, Coen, Matney NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT': Councilmen: Bartlett, Gibbs, Duke SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY PURSUANT TO RES NO 3697 - APPROVED The-City Administrator addressed Council regarding the following Parcel of property which had been declared surplus by Resolution No. 3697 adopted J,--e 4, 1973 and on which an Exemption Declaration had been adopted by Council on October 1, 1973:r ,!Parcel 2 - Lots 1-9 inclusive - Block 813 of HB Tract - 11A 6 Wesley Park Section - Located intersection Main & 14th lj Streets.1 ABSENT: Councilmen: Bartlett, Gibbs, Duke YES: Councilmen: Shipley, Green, Coen, Matney DES: Councilmen : None h,; the following vote rent-i ert be s+ubect to . `strative Review. The motion Was passed The City Administrator informed Council that this property had been advertised for bid on October 15, 1973, however no bids had been received and the Council had author- 1z ed the City Administrator to readvertise the parcel at the time which would be most advantageous to the City. He stated that an offer to purchase the property for, an amount of $60,000 had been received from Mr. B. G. Williams and that he would recommend the acceptance of this bid. Mr. Floyd Belsito, Executive Assistant, addressed Council regarding the bid"proposal.' On motion by Shipley, Council accepted the offer of $60,000 submitted by Mr. $, G. Williams for Parcel 2 Lots 1-9 inclusive Block 813 of HB Tract - Wesley,Park Sec- tion - Located intersection Main & 14thStreets, with the condition that the develop SI 4 Minutes: V.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments ,dnesday, April 17, 1974 Pa :. 6 3. ff-street parking facilities shall conform to Artic 970- 4. Wat supply shall be through the City of Huntin on Beach's water upply system. 5. Sewage di osal shall be through the City o Huntington Beach's sewage syst . 6. The property s 11 participate in the ocal drainage assessment district. (Conta Dept . of Public W ks) 7. No structures, other han those own on the approved plot plan, shall be constru tad wit n the project. 8. The sewer system shall be proved by the Department of Public Works and ?ire Dep rt ent. 9. All applicable City 0 inances all be complied with. GENERAL: 1. All signs for e proposed development all be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for ap oval . The Board of Zoning justments encourages signs whic reflect a common t me with respect to design materials and colors which e compatible with the architectural thete of the prop ed project . Signs shall be limited to wall signs. 2-. required fire hydrants shall be installed, acces 'ble and operable prior to the construction of any permanen structure using combustible material. 3. All conditions of Tentative Tract 6948 shall be complied wit . AYES: Eadie, Spencer, Ford NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-40 A licant: W. H. Thomas & B. G. Williams To permit the construction of four (4) family dwellings pursuant to Res. No. 3697 and at the request of the City Council located on the southwest corner of Main Street and 14th Street in an R-1, low density residential district. Mr. Williams, the applicant, was present. The Chairman informed the Board that this application is a categorical exemption, class 3, California Environmental Quality Act, 1970. Board discussed plans with applicant. Minutes: H.B.bard of Zoning Adjustments Wednesday, April 17, 1974 Pago 7 Parking and fencing of the proposed development was discussed. Board discussion followed. Conditions of approval were discussed. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY FORD ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-40 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. All ordinance code requirements shall be complied with. AYES: Eadie, Spencer, Ford NOES: None ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-41 Applicant: Kaino Hamu To permit the construction of an industrial building pursua -o 5.9511 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code located the w t side of Commerce Lane, 125 ft. north of Research Dr've in a 1 -Ml-A 20,000 restricted industrial district. Messrs . illard & John Schultz, representing the plicant, were present. The Chairman i formed the Board that this ap ication is exempt from Environmen 1 Review Board requiremen s due to the adoption of Environmental act Report No. 73-16 y the City Council on March 18, 1974. ON MOTION BY SPENCER AN SECOND BY ADIE THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS ADOPTED ENVIR MENT IMPACT REPORT NO. 73-16 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Eadie, Spencer, F rd NOES: None ABSENT: None Board discussed p ans with applicant's re esentatives. A shortage of -andscaping was noted and disco ed. The re- arrangement f parking to meet landscaping requ- ements was discussed The a licant's representatives stated that they did t know the ntended use of the proposed building at this time. oard discussion followed. Conditions of approval were discussed.