HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Reviews ARX1974057 - Supporting DocumentsMinutes;H»1l, *rd of Zoning Adjustments
P dnnesday, May 9, 1974
13. TO COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION:
1. Sla Avenue shall be fully improve includingtreet
trees , treet signs, street light , fire hyd nts,
sewer an ater main extension".
2. The propert s 11 pertic' ate in th ocal drainage
assessment dil"'r 4t. ( tact Dept of Publi c Works)
3. No structure;, at an tho shown on the approved
nst,c d within the project.
1. All s' ns for the oposed veloplhSnt shall be submitted
to e Board of oning Adjus ents fo approval. The
and of Zon' g Adjustments en urages ns which
reflect a moron theme with reap t to de n materialE,
ard Col s which are compatible wit-4 the arc 'tectural
plot plan shall e
GENERAL %
them f the proposed project,
AYES; Eadie, Spencer, cord
NOES' None
NT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO 74-57
Applicants Parviz Nouz,afchan
To permit an addition to an existing shopping center building
pursuant to 5,9430 of th:Iluntington Beach Ordinance Code
located on the north side of Warner. Avenue, approximately
150 ft. west of Goldenwest Street in a C-2, communi ty business
district.
Mr. Noura f chan, the applicant , was present.
The chairman informed the Board that this application is a
^ategorical exemption , class 3 , California Environmental
6uality Act, 1970.
The Applicant outlined his propo s al to the Board6 He stated
that the proposal is for a minor addition to an existing
shopping center.
The Board discussed plans with applicant . It was pointed out
to the applicant that a drainage problem exists on the proposed
site, Mr. Nourafchan stated that he has a reciprocal agreement
with the adjoining sho ;.ping c enter to utilize the existing drains,
The sprinkler system was discussed as well as proper ingress
and egress to the proposed site
E
Minutes: U.B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Wodnesday, May 8, 1974
Page 10
It was the consensus of the T]oard to continue this application
to allow applicant to submit revised plans showing precise
bui1(-'ing locations.
ON NOTION BY FORD AND SECOND BY SPENCER ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 74-57 WAS CONTINUED TO NAY 15, 1974 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Sadie , Spencer, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO..74-S5_ .. ..,
_„.licant: La Cuesta
To p emit a variation of the front yard setback within Tract
o. 8 0 pursuant to S.9106.2.1 of the Huntington Beach
0 line. Code located on the west side of Homestead La e
app oxima ly 120 ft. from Franciscan Circle in an R- ,
sins fami residential district.
Mr. Mike ager, epresenting the applicant , was esent.
The Chairman 'nform the Board that this app catic is a
categorical ex- tion , class 5, California viro ntal Quality
Act, 1970.
Mr. Jagger outlined e propbsal to th Boar .
The plot plan and Condit ns of a ..oval acre discussed.
ON MOTION BY EADIE AND SECON B SPE R ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 74-58 WAS APPROVED WITH T FO O1+1 CONDIT1Ot1S AS OUTLINED
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE :
1. Applicant shall compl w' h S.91 .2.1 of e Huntington
Beach Ordinance Cod
2. P3.,t Plan receiv ay 8, 1974 shall b the appro d layout.
AYES: Eadie, encer, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT: Non
MISCEL B S:
The ha' n discussed conditions of approval regarding
A ins. trativeReview No, 73-1.96, a proposal to construct
dr e-in restaurant per the applica'r*_t l s request to modify
said ond,itidns
W rvY . .,lw
gdenEc'! ay, :day 15,
C ITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. applicant shall post a brand sufficient to over his proportionate share
cf tore undergrounding with the Department of Public %brks.
2. This icant's project shall be constructed as to facilitate future
groLu
ice.
3. The agp stall deli cai:e at this t, re any easements that will
for Tutu ground service.
AYES: Ea_ie, encer, Ford
NOES: No
ABSENT: Non
CONDITIONAL EXC'VPTION * 74-29
Applicant: Elia John rcia;
To permit a garden wall to croach 9 ft. in, the front yard setback
in lieu of S. 9103. of the ntington Beac Ordinance Code located
on the west side of unburst L e, approx' ately 360 ft. north of
Chestnut Drive in an -1, low de ity r. dential district.
The applicant was not p esent.
The Chairman informed the oard t s application is a categorical
exemption, class 5, Califon is t ironme al Quality Act, 1970.
The Chairman opened the publt' easing,
Board discussed plans. I s e consensus o the Board, after
reviewing written justif'c tions, that a hardshi had not been
demonstrated.
sAs there were no pa: to s present to ak in favor of r opposition
to Conditional Ex p on No. 74-29, the hairman closed he public
hearing .
ON MOTION BY -PE ER AND SECOND BY FORD COND IONAL EXCEPTIO
NO. 74-29 S D NIED FOR. TI3E FOLLOWING REASONS Y THE FOLLOWINt VOTE :
I. Fai re o demonstrate justifiabl e hardship.
2. A is otciitional Exception would constitute a specs. I privilege
inc tsistent with other properties in the vicinity.
AYES- Eadie, Spencer, Ford
NOE : None
ABSENT: None
ZLDMINISTRATIVE REVIEW No. 74-57 Cont. from 5/8/74
Appli:, a.t: I?arviz Nourafc,han
To permit an addition to an existing shopping center buildingpursuant to S. 9430 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code located
on the north side o: Warner Avenue, approximately 150 ft. west of
Goldenweat Street in a C-2, community business district.
Mr. Nourafchan, the applicant, was present.
a
MMinutes : H. B k Board of zoning Adjustments
Wednesday, 14ay 15, 1974
Page 19
The Chairman informed the Board that this application is a
categorical exemption, class 3, California Environme `
Quality Act, 1970.
The chairman stated that a check on the overall center >irking
was in excess of ordinance code requirements. The rsrc: _%-,,ad
additional building square footage make this center :r:nquent
in parking.
Additional .Landscaping was discussed as well as signing for the
additional building.
Board discussion followeA.
Conditions of approval were discussed.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY EADIE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
NO. 74-57 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AS
OUTLINED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
A. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS :
1. The revised slot plan received May 14, 1.974 shall be
the approved layout.
2. Elevations of the proposed plan received April 24, 1974
shall be the approved elevations. Building materials
shall be within the parameters of the existing archi-
tecture on the shopping center.
3. Soil and compaction reports as required by the Building
Department and the Department of Public Works shall be
submitted and approved by the City.
Plana depicting the fire protection systems including
automatic sprinkler systems, fire hydrants, fire alarms
and ary required fire protection device shall be approved
by the Fire and Public Works Departments.
B. TO BIB COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
1.All utilities shall be installed underground.
2.Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington
Beach's water supply system.
3.Sewage disposal shall be tarot h the City of Huntington
Beach's sewage says ter. .
4.The property shall participate in t
assessment district. (Contact Dept.
drainage
olio WorJcs)
minutes: H.B. Board Of aning Adjustments
Wednesday, May 15 , 1974
Page 20
o structures, other than those shown on the approved
plot plan, shall be constructed within the project.
GENERAL:
1. All signs for the proposed Development shall be submitted
to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for approval. The Board
of Zoning Adjustments encourages signs which reflect a
common theme with respect to design materials and colors
which are compatible with the architectural. theme of the
proposed project.
2. No other detached signs shall be constructed for the
remainder of the shopping center,
AYES: Eadie, Spencer, Ford
NOES: None
ABSENT; None
SCELLANEOUS
AD KSTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 72-ill
A la.>i Huntin ton Executive Park
Proposal variation to screening wall requirement for
Huntington e tive Park.
Mr. Everett Dod s present to discuss variation to screen' g
wall.
Mr. Daryl Smith, Stree e Superintendent, w prese to
discuss the proposed var t it was Mr. ith's inion that
additional 15 gallon plant to ose shown n the ans should
be used. He further felt th th.. lant' g wotu blend in with
the present architecture. Mr. .. ith then fered to inspect
plants prior to planting to be su : e rg' of an acceptable
quality. It was Mr. Smith's opin' that plant material
would not provide the immediate cree g a wa would, and it
would probably be about 2 year befo at woul akppen.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND S OND FORD VAR TION TO SC NING
WALL REQUIREMENT WAS APP VED THE FOLLOWIN VOTE:
AYES: Spencer, For
NOES : Eadie
ABSENT: None
SIGNS :
Applicant : Redeemer Lutheran Church 63 SQ .FT. GROUND
16351 Springdale IDENTIFICATION SI
Huntington Beach, CA
Loc ion: Same
Minutes : Huntington cb Board of Zoning Adjuotom
January 2, 1975
Page 10
MI ELLANEOUS ITEi4S CONTINUE:
Adminis rative Review No. 74-226
ON MOTION CROSBY AND SECOND BY SPENCER, ADMINIST TIVE REVIEW NO. 74-225
WAS APPROVED TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND VI NG$, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
I. The plot plan r eived December 31, 1974 hall be the approved layout.
2. The applicant shat install a service anel to facilitate conversion to
underground utiliti es t a future d e, pursuant to 5.9730.11 of the
Huntington Beach Ordina ,e Code.
Th(- Board has considered all Sul. el es for approval of overhead utilities,
and all criteria has been sati ied, p suant to Section 9730.10 of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Co e.
AYES: EADIE, SPENCER, C SBY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ADMINISTRATIVE REV EW NO774-191
Applicant: Gera d Jonea
The Board rev ewed a revised plot plan, submitted per CondiCio A.1 of this
application
ON MOTION Y CROSBY AND SECOND BY SPENCER, IHC REVISED PLAN FOR ADM STRATIVE
REVIEW 74-191 WAS APPROVED BY :11E FOLLOWING VOTE.
AYBS• EADIE , SPENCER, CROSBY
NO NONE
SENT: NONE
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW NO. 74-57
cant; Parviz Nourafchan
The Board reviewed a Wa11. Sign, submitted per General Condition No. 1 of this
application.
ON MOTION BY SPENCER AND SECOND BY CROSBY THE WALL SIGN FOR VF..,..
REVIEW NO. -.. WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION BY THE FOLLOWING
You*
CONDITION: All Ordinance Code requirements shall be complied with.
:EADIE SPENCER CROSBY
NOES NONE