Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Approvals AAX1982006 - Supporting DocumentsISEEZ-621111 01H P.C). BOX 190 CAL.IFORs'IIA92648 DEPAHTI ENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING l2VI$1ON (71.1 b?65241 PLANNUU8C .„ :.%f7imer536-5271 Decerbir 12r Ring Sr-otl;rs Corporate ion 501 Santa Eoni.ca Pot 1e-vard Sant a Monica , California 904U1 January 4, 1983, thy-Planning co32u l asion ApptoVed Adminiotrat iv+e Action No. 82-6, a 1 Fi uest. to permit 1'(:r.:, *: 'l.»c=T2d d U of nonconforming freest andinq pole sign for a two year period. The c nciitlr .-ns of 3[e z4val a l1owt -'d the continued nonconforming citins until anuary4, 19SS At t two-year period, t;[7u vign will Le r =1uir-I to he all provisio ns of the Huntat,,,ron X63<4c ``kttq Cork_". removal of the sign in :u eotLen , or alth:ation of conform with the sign We. o are her eby r oque rte We Action 40. 82- is le tter. if you should have any cuen contact the undrer's .one d at Ma. 889d-4) Attachm ent: Concti.timna of Approval Adminis tra tiv e Act ion 1ar1, 62-6 cc. Safeway st- re s Inc; i nn of the clu£ to 2 or t e;, to crrrl forc . to a nov neat2 i on to cumber a r> I1::1 Mr. n es W. . 1 ` aa 1. I' sF C,. :..."'.,ry ttuntin'gtorl Beacs'° i' nnina .{]r l.:i; ?(' n P. 0. Pct. 190 £:un'ti ntltoa+ Dc a chr CA 92648 I. idr :'s.1:i3.S trat«?vt Action 432-6 Gent l emen Thi s j ottox w i ll 44G-"kno lodq ` an be h al f of P i n g g Br o tb r s CCr oratiaa, o;r:racla o f tQ Marshal l 's S1 oT 1.rti Cent" n on Peach P ule v and t h at the rQcoat l y approved Liquor Barn f ree 5tarlu],I'.g role sign is a r,ol..conforr .llt; _ iqn a run be "cmos.•'ci Jr rarl3 a rc wi thin :;'::J years o f its corstruc DR: = cc; jeff D or:ck Safe ;c°1y Stor Very tru3 y .'okra--, flc1;i.d R e v; '"G ,evutI.``,re V]_ "e ,riissi4ent a.h-h P1anninq Cen,iissicon January 4, 1983 Rage 9 t businesse s, strict comrl_iance wi 3 . The granti ng of this spec .'ai ` r ra permit a.... not constitute gener ally to the property . res4lt in a substantial 2. Beoause of the configuratlon ^ tiar (`!»,j tinr 1S3I.)T ing center and the location of the businesses, tiro ap°{.a r cant has d ;i >nstrated that an exceptional and ox'traor'ditiary:, % uI?st :once does apply) grantIng of a specL'a . pr,'ar. x.e sin c tee suoject ousirn.esse- pre- sently have a freestandinft s.i--ra„ The locat ion of the sin circulat ion nor will it center. DITIO NS OF APPRO Buildin g permits for thv-e have been issued p sign, .1pact pedestrian or vehicular ;a ,c.r t is x r rr.t in the subject 2. The plot plan and sign elevati ons ' >?' " ed 'nn d dated Deem 1982, shall be the approved ;; c,n ioc at,i n and. levat :i:.r-is. AYES; Higgins, Livengcod, NOES: Tione ABSENT: Paone , rlirjahangir ABSTAIN; None ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION NO. heigh t of the sign. A' request to permit the extended use of a nn conforrri,ng free standing pole sign located on the east side of Beach Boulevard approximately 00 feet north of Terry Street. The applicant, Jeff Dierck, stated that the lease on the building is fur a 10 year period and he wanted to use the sign for as long as the life of the lease, commissioner Winchell. asked staff about the existing sign. Mr. Bellaaia explained that after two years, for the center to ccmply with the sign code, either the existing sign would have to be removed or the sign which is not being used by "Marshalls". Commissioner Porter felt that as far as the sign corridor, Beach Boulevard is a major problem. He rod that although he would approve an administrative action on the sign for two years, he would not approve a special sign permit for the life of the sign. Secretary Palmn added that as the trees mature on BeachBoulevard, the visibility of this sign would. be blocked at the present ,p t ican : Safewa Stares T lc rporatec MOTI ON BY LIVENG00E AND SECOND BY BIOGIIiS ADMINISTRATIVE . `4110N ii.'d, `plan :a.i Cor`utt January 4 , 3 3 Page 10 `i`IONS, BY T11B DOLT OWING d'C3'i .^ac p2_6 1 i.d API POVED FOP A 4I f" w ).e. a period of two years. At the conclusion of the two-year period, th`u sign shill be made to conf[;:rm t<.i all p7:.°ov1sions of the Hun- listed below. 2. The continued use of the nonconforming sign will be allowed CO N)- 1. The Admi istrativez Action w,r=11 he$:,°ome°eeexffeCU'UeaKsoonas}the City receives a letter from the property owner concurring with the re- moval of the modified sign accor d ing to the condition of approval tington beach ordinance Code. AYES: Higgins, Li sengoo d, l inche ll, Po>: NUTS: None AUSE T: Paone , Mir jahangiir ABSTAIN: None CUSSION ITEMS: Freeway Oriented Signs (Won commission consensus on the prop :jsed way oriented s igns in the City, was Schumacher 82) de ar er:ndi-z -nt to apply to free- reason for this de rision was ba sed on the anticipated to be very limited. pursue it any further. The t that applications were (item E-2 on the agenda was deleted.) `iity Council Action at the January 3, 1983 Meetin tional criteria for game arcades. He further stated that the interim affordable housing item was continued to their next meeting,, with a possibility of be ng referred back to the Planning Commission for pos- sible reorganization of the committe dealinj with this issue. said that the Council approved the code amendment dealing with l ca Secretary Palin listed the highlights of the City Council meeting. commissioners were asked to set tentative schedules for a tour the Huntir;ton West Condominium conversion site. LEVELOPMSNT SERVICES ITEMS There being no further business before the Planning Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P.M. to the nest regular meeting on January ? 8, 1983. James W. Pal'a n , qeoret Marcus Porter, Vice Chairman AA 82-6 January 4, 190;3 Page 2 Section 9760 .48, None n e rie nq ,aan Action of the Planning Comm ission states that bet ore ranting anY c ctension un rt i s section he Planning Commission must find and, determin(: the foll owing . (a) that because of un.igue circumstances appriic bl to the sign alterati on, re- moval, or r eplacu sient within the time tom, eeiiied in -ection 9760.46 will result in a substantial economi c hardship or that the applicant will suffer great financia l Joss thereby; tb) that the sign will not adversely affect other lawful ly , rected signs in the same area, (c) tha t the s gn will not be detrimental, to the property located in the vicinity of the property on which said sign is located. (d) that the sign will be in keep- ing with the char ac'teer if the fu Yraunad i n': n i g hbo,rhood, and (t=)t ha t the sign shall not obstruct t he vision nf vehicular or pFedest_rian traffic. The staff has revs img determination: with the ordinance applicant has also affect other signs properties, -a.nd wi RECO10NENDATIO : the Huntington Bosch Ordinance Cud = two -year period, the si. n shall be nude to c aw f ,rm to all , pro visions of conforming sign for, a period of two ears, At the conclusion of -_far cant concurs the Plaannin coEt r,'ssion allow the continued use of {i.e non-4 wed iad-ministr°ativr, Action No. 82-6 and made the follow- The tip ixI i c ant has demonstrat e d that strict compliance will result in a substantial economic hardsha_p. The demonstrated that the existing sign will not adversely in t.;he, area, is not detriwental to. the surrounding 1 not obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. In view of the above in.formii tion, t h --- St-'lft I 't I.r ernTs that I the appl, recommends that the Planning Commission deny Administrative Action No. 82-6 and require the app licant to bri- th . cxist .n e nonconforming sign into conformance ,gash all provisions 976, Si gn -Code , or the if the applicant does ne t concur with this rec. u:nend ation,, then the staf f Huntington . Beach Ordinance Code. ,TZS: d 'Yrrt rn axz i 4 HUNTINGTON 1EACH PLANNING DIVI