Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdministrative Approvals AAX1984004 - Supporting Documentsá Mike Adams stated that the staff reviewed the request of the applicant and concurs that the proposed location of the storage building will not adversely affect the adjacent residential property. Warren Pitts, the architect, was present for questions. Some discussion took place regarding the location of the trash bins and the setback from the storage building. ON MOTION SY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS SITE PLADi ? MENDM.ENT '10. 84-05 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1, The site plan received and dated April 27, 1984,, and elevations received and dated April 4, 1984, shall be the approved layout, 2. Building materials used for the storage building shall closely , resemble the color and materials of the existing church. The final design of the storage building shall be subject to review and approval,of the Director of Development Services prior to iasuar_':e of building permits AYES; Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir NMS,. None ABSENT: Erskine, Schumacher ABSTAIN, None ADM1WISTRATIVE ACTION NO. 84-4 A licant. Foha C. Brown A request to change sign copy . i two existing freestanding signs located at 89G7 Warner and l6931 Magnolia. Staff recommends that if the applicant and property owner concur, the Planning Commission allow the continued use of the nonconforming sign for a period not to exceed two years from the date of approval. At the end of the two year period, the sign shall be made to conform with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, The applicant representative, David Burke, stated that he was agreeable to the recommended conditions in the staff report. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAU,t,NGIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION. NO, 84-4 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING TOTE s FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- 1. Due to unique circumstances applicable to the sign, immediate alteration, removal or replacement of the signs will result in an economic hardship, 2. The signs will not adversely affect other lawfully erected signs in the same area. 4 4.P.C The signs will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of the property on which said signs are loca The signs will be in keeping with the char surrounding,neighborhood. cter of the The signs will not obstruct the vision of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. CONDITIONS OF APPRCVALw where said sign is located and remove said sign, and the cost two years fr i . ',X're date o,t approval, the City of Huntington Beach or its „ants or employees may enter on the property removal of each sign structure. If the sign is not made to ;onform with applicable. provisions of the sign code after Prior to 1-,suence of building permits, the applicant shall file a cash :,)nd in the amount of $1500 or its equivalent as approved by the Mity Attorney, with the Cit°' for the purpose of indemnifying the -ity for any and all costs incurred in the of removal shall he deducted from the bond and summarily rfeited and paid over to the City of Huntington Beach, and the remainder, if any, returned to the person depositing the bond 2,The property owner shall obtain a separate permit for each sign. 3. The site plan and elevations received and dated April 13, 1984, shall be the approved layout. AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Livongood, Porter, Mirjahangir NOESt None ASSENT: Erskine, Schumacher ABSTAIN None SITE PLC AMENDMENT NO, 84-06 Applicant: Mola Develo meat Cor oration Site Plan Amendment No. 84 -06 is a request to amend the approved site plan for a 77-unit planned residential development located at the ' southwesterly extension of Countess Drive, adjacent to the Main Channel in Huntington Harbour . Conditional Use Permit No. 83-24 was approved permitting the development of the 77-unit project on September 20, 1983 . The site plan amendment request is for the fo wing modifications to the approved site plant 1. Incorporate a 10 foot wide public walk bulkheadff ay e along the Provide for a 15 foot setback from the-edge of the public walkway to the it in structure. -14- 5-1-84 P.C. The signs will not be detrimental to the property located in the vicinity of the property on which said signs are located. The signs will be in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The signs will not obstruct the vision of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant-shall file a cash bond in the amount of $1506 or its equivalent as approved by the City Attorney, with the City for the purpose of indemnifying the City for any and all costs incurred in the removal of each sign structure. If the sign is not made to conform with the applicable provisions of the sign code after two years from the date of approval, the City of Huntington Beach or its agents or employees may enter on the property where said sign is located and remove said sign, and the cost of removal shall be deducted from the bond. and summarily forfeited and paid over to the City of Huntington Beach, and the remainder, if any, returned to the person depositing the bond. it for each 3. The site plan and elevations received and dated April 13. 1984,shall be the approved layout. AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir 2. The property owner shall obtain a separa sign. NOES . None Applicant. :cola Develo ment Cot oration Site Plan. AmendmentNo. 84-06 is a request to amend the approved site plan for a 77-unit.planned residential oeve,',opment located at the southwesterly extension of Countess Drive, adjacent to the Main Channel in Huntington Harbour, Conditional Use Permit No. 83-24 was approved permitting the development of the 77-unit project on September 20, 1983N The site plan amendment request is for the following modifications to thn approved site plan ASSENT . 'Erskine, Schumacher ABSTAIN ,. None SITE 'PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-06 incorporate a 10 foot wide public walkway easement along the bulkhead Provide for a 15 foot setback from the edge of the public walkway to the main structure. 14- 5'1-84 P.C.. a Mike Adams stated at the staff revieo,=?d the request of the applicant and concurs that tht; proposed location of the storage building will not adversely affect the adjacent residential property, Warren Pitts, the architect, was present for questions, the setback from the storage building. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NO0 34-05 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOT Some' discussion took place regarding the location of the trash bins and CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL z 1. The site plan received and dated April 27, 1984, and .elevations received and dated April 4, 1t'14, shall be the approved layout. 2. Building materials used for the storage building shall closely resemble the color and materials of the existing church. The final design of the storage building shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of Development Services prior to issuance of building permits, Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, None Erskine,Schumacher None Porter, Mirjahangir ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION NO, 84-4 A licantz John C. Brown A request to. change sign copy in two existing freestanding signs located at 8907 War:ner_ and 16931 Magnolia. staff recommends that if the applicant and property owner concurs the Planning Commission allow the,continuera use of the nonconforming sign for a period not to exceed two years from the date of approval. At the end of the two year period, the sign shall be made to conform with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, The applicant representative, David Burke, stated that he was agreeable to the recommended conditions in the staff report. ON MOTION BY, LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIP:JAHIANGIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION NO, 54--4 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THEE'OLLOWING VOTE w FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL-. Due to unique circumstances applicable to the sign, immediate alter'ation,'removal,or" replacement of the signs will result in an economic hardship, The signs will not adversely; affect other lawfully erected signs in the same area: 5-1-84 P.C. (Complete frith sides) x247AWount Gat>ez April 27, 1984 See Belowci t nn Che k TO: t iuision :_ Account N er : 0 7.01 Approve S , N N G FOR; 'ETTY, CASH RE1'UCD EXPENSE 7 C N' ACCOUNT (Check One) DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Refund of filing xor r,pecia,1 Si,c;n1aermi acted in error. Fcc: paid on nef%-ij:,4t 0-701 SU MI°I"J'ED BY. DATE w.c. Brown Tnt+` rprx.Doo 20132 Miehe1 o? Irvi ne,, CA 2711 TOTAL AMOU NT DUE OVER UY 47.00. Director Est E+ibance r INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION From p S,ibjec SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT During my research into microfilm, rec square feet,I riiscauered permits for restaurant signs were granted by Spec Therefore, I request processing as Ad to property owner, and return of fiii May 1, l9S4n :jim 83d rds of Plaza Cuidad bui a ng all tour existing signs; The two al sign Permit No. 78-4. inistrative Action, letter sent g fee. Projected da,ing date usan Pierc,:- á á . J i i A t, id"R WIbbOL 149 *ilk 'Mr.x $r*. John C. brown11100 WArn r, 5uxx * #368 'OUrtt atn Vo l ley, t'*. 92704 rM Cr A*QV "FNI% LtN>y" rOP IWIM,O Per"4;41•>CI83-47 'runt Heedgrantor herritt _aztxltw txwagknt_o l±8k r " '+.' r{ i, 9":1 1ffF xk3'. rrrr_ <e:° +.E.I I. It l Farosy, , W 1..3: a4 ;. dr'lA9, 3VIA111:r :11 Atnt JW F'>- r'LV ]rW M1YX <t* C.."M1 i...lb' KJlI`tz0.l Yr Ile7'1 ua1 t +4a .:.et*31M, 1li0 - wi+'MaL bilnu.>. t,gR'y ; 5 S'A44 .a1tT .FNa .: ..M+c et 4i1 •"t... y`y wT"