HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2017-33 authorizing adoption of a CapitDept. ID PW 17-035 Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: 8/7/2017
30�d (JG�
-7-0
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR. CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 8/7/2017
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2017-33 authorizing adoption of a Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) for years 2017/18 through 2023/24 to comply with Measure M
requirements for Orange County Transportation (OCTA) funding
Statement of Issue:
In compliance with Measure M (M2) funding eligibility, the City of Huntington Beach is required to
adopt an annual resolution approving a Seven -Year Measure M Capital Improvement Program
(CIP).
Financial Impact:
No additional funding is required for this resolution. Annual M2 local fair -share allocation is
approximately $4 million for the City and several projects are allocated grants through competitive
programs.
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolution No. 2017-33, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Adopting a Capital Improvement Program for the Years 2017/2018 Through 2023/2024 for
Compliance with Renewed Measure M Eligibility Requirements."
Alternative Action(s):
Do no adopt the resolution and forego M2 future eligibility. The action would result in the loss of $4
million for the next fiscal year, and the loss of allocated and potential grants for traffic and street
improvements.
Analysis:
M2 is a 30-year multi -billion dollar program extension of the original Measure M (1991-2011). M2
funds are generated from the transactions for sales and use tax, plus an interest on earnings. Net
revenues maybe allocated to local jurisdictions for a variety of programs identified in Ordinance No.
3. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) determines if a local jurisdiction is eligible
to receive M2 fair -share and competitive funds.
The City must satisfy certain requirements to maintain eligibility in order to receive funding from
OCTA. A key requirement is the adoption of a CIP. The CIP identifies all projects currently and
potentially funded by OCTA Funds.
Below are current projects that are funded by OCTA local fair -share or grants:
1. Adams Avenue Rehabilitation from Beach Boulevard to Newland Street
Item 11. - 1 HB -10S-
Dept. ID PW 17-035 Page 2 of 2
Meeting Date: 8/7/2017
2. Atlanta Rehabilitation from Beach Boulevard to Newland Street
3. Atlanta Avenue Widening from Huntington Street to Delaware Street
4. Brookhurst and Adams Avenue Intersection Widening Design
5. Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation from Edwards Street to Springdale Street
6. Heil Avenue Rehabilitation from Springdale Street to Bolsa Chica Street
7. Indianapolis Avenue Rehabilitation from Newland Street to Beach Boulevard
8. Slater Avenue Rehabilitation from Goldenwest Street to Gothard Street
9. Springdale Street Rehabilitation from Warner Avenue to Slater Avenue
10. Utica Bicycle Boulevard from Main Street to Beach Boulevard
Public Works Commission Action:
Not Required
Environmental Status:
Not applicable for this action. Projects are reviewed on an individual basis during the design phase.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Enhance and maintain infrastructure
Attachment(s):
1. Resolution No. 2017-33, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Adopting a Capital Improvement Program for the Years 2017/2018 Through 2023/2024 for
Compliance with Renewed Measure M Eligibility Requirements"
2. Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3.
HB -109- Item 11. - 2
ATTACHMENT #1
RESOLUTION NO.2017-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR THE YEARS 2017/2018 THROUGH 2O23/2024 FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH RENEWED MEASURE M ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, on November 6, 1990, the Orange County voters approved the original
Measure M, the revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance, for twenty
years (1991-2011). On November 7, 2006, the Orange County voters approved Renewed
Measure M. Renewed Measure M is a thirty year (2011-2041), multi -billion dollar program
extension of the original Measure M; and
Renewed Measure M Net Revenues are generated from the transactions and use tax plus
any interest or other earnings -after allowable deductions. Net Revenues may be allocated to
local jurisdictions for a variety of programs identified in Ordinance No. 3. Compliance with the
eligibility requirements established in Ordinance No. 3 must be established and maintained in
order for local jurisdictions to receive Net Revenues; and
One of the eligibility requirements for Measure M is the adoption of a Capital
Improvement Program for the years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 7T H day of AUGUST , 2017.
's
Mayor
REVIE APPROVED: APPROVED AS '
ty Manager City Attorney
EXHIBIT A - SEVEN YEAR INITIATED AND APPROVED:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Directof of fublic Works
7,04
Glv
µ✓
17-5867/160495/RLS 6/16/17/PD
EXHIBIT "A"
6/612017 Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Adams Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization and
Communication Eauioment Uoorades
Project Limits: From Beach Boulevard to City Boundary (Multi
Jurisdictional)
Project Number. 13-OCTA-TSP-3663
Type of work (TOrej: Systems Management
TOW Description: Communications interne between agency and
Caltrans to manage traffic
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure improvements.
°UND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
Dther 2.68 $134 $134 Annual Maintenance
>QMD 97.32 $4,866 $4,866
$6,000 $5,000
Protect Phase
17H 8 .
18119
19120
20/21
21122
22123
23/24
Estimated Cost
Proiecfed Cost .
E _
S0.
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0...$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
S5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$ 5,000
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Arterial Rehabilitation
Project Limits: Heil Ave (Edwards -Springdale), Atlanta Ave
(Delaware -Beach), and Indianpolis Ave
Project Number. !Beach-Maonolia)
Type of work (TOW): Road Maintenance
TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description: Rehabilitate Artredal's Heil Avenue, Atlanta Avenue,
and Indianapolis Avenue
FUND NAME
PERCENT :.
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECTED COST NOTES
General Fund
22.73
$0
$0
M2 Fairshare
45,45
$0
$0
Other
27.27
$0
$0 Infrastructure Fund
Prop 42
4.55
$0
$0
$0
$0
Project Phase
17/18
18119
= 19f20
20/21
21M
22I23
2W24
Estimated Cost
Proieoted Cost
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0:
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
s0
$ 0
6/6/2017 Measure M 2
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Arterial Rehabilitation FY 2017-18
Project Limits: 1)Springdale-Bolsa
Ch ica;2)N ewland-Beach; 3)Goldenwest-Gothard;4)E
Project Number. dwards-SDrinadale_51Wamer-Slater
Type of work (TOW): Road Maintenance
TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description: Rehabilitate 1)Hejl, 2)lndianapolis, 3)Slater, 4)Edinger,
5)Springdale
:UND NAME _
PERCENT .
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECTED COST NOTES
3eneral Fund
21.16
$1,000.000
$1,000,000
A2 Fairshare
55.02
$2.600,000
$2,600,000
ether
23.82
$1,125,734
$1.125,734 RMRA
$4,725,734
34,725,734
Pioieci Phase
17/18
19/19
19/20
20121
21/22
22123
23124
_
Estimated Cost
Proieofed Cost
E
$S0.000
$.0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$50,000
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/1
$4,675,734
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,675,734
$4,675,734
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,726,734
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,725,734
$ 4,726,734
Agency. Huntington Beach
Project Name: Atlanta Avenue Widenino
Project Limits: Atlanta Avenue (Huntington St. to Delaware St)
Project Number. 15-HBCH-ACE-3770
Type of Work (TOW): Road Widening
TOW Description: Add 1 lane to existing roadway in project limits
ProjectDescription: This project will widen the south side of Atlanta
Avenue. This project is carryover from FY 15116
CIP.
:UND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
A2 ACE 75.00 $0 $0
general Fund 25.00 $0 $0 25% Match to previously approved M2 ACE
$0 $0
Proied Phase
7.] �1a
18119
19120
02 121
21M
22123
23/24 '
Estimated Cost'
Proiected Cost
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
_ $0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C11
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$ 0
Measure M 3
6/6/2017
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Bridae Preventative Maitenance
Project Limits: Magnolia Street and Brookhurst Street Bridge at
Pacific Coast Hiahwav
Project Number:
Type or work (Tow): Road Maintenance
TOW Description: Bridge
Project Description: Provide Design and Construction of City Bridges
including Roadway. This project was included as an
amendment to FY 15/16 CIP.
Project Phase
17/18
16/
E'
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
O&M
$0
$0
$o
$o
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue Intersection
Imorovement
Project t.tmits: Intersection of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue
Project Number. 11-HBCHACE-3526 (Eng only)
Type of Work (row): Intersection
Tow Description: Add through and right turn lanes to intersection
Project Description: Add through lanes and right turn pockets to
intersection to improve traffic flow and reduce
congestion.
FUND NAME
PERCENT
ESTIMATED
COST PROJECTED COST . ;NO
Gas Tax
16.94
$0
$D
M2 Fairshare
1.08
$0
$0
Other
72.74
$0
$0 Water Fund
Prop 42
9.24
$0
$0 -
$0
$0
M21
21/22
23:
23124 .'
Estimated Cost
:
Projected Cost
$0
$0
$0::
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$ 0
:UND NAME
PERCENT ..
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECTED COST ` NOTES
s'as Tax
1.19
$84,6D4
$85,705
A2ICE
3.57
$253,809
$257,112 11-HBCH-ICE-3526
Jnfunded
9$.23
$6,761,587
$6,849,583
$7,100,000
$7,192,400
Pro�Phase
77118
18/19
19120
20121
211
72/23
23124
Estimated Cost
Proieict Cost
E
R
C/I
O&M
$0
$2,900,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2.900.000
$4,200,000
$0
$0
$2,900,000
$4,292,400
$0
$2,900,000
$4,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,100,000
$ 7,192,400
Measure M 4
6/612017
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Brookhurst Street Svnchronizabon
Project Limits: Garfield Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
Project Number. 16-OCTA-TSP-3794
Type of work jTOwj: Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure improvements.
This is a corridor project managed by OCTA and
funding reflets planned improvements within
Huntington Beach only.
:UND NAME
PERCENT
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECTED COST NOTE ,
3eneral Fund
1.19
$10,000
$10,217
42 TSSP
73.36
$618.757
$632,208
\QMD
25.46
$214,733
$219,401
$843,490
$861,827
Project Phase
17/18
18/19 ,'
19120
20121
21/22
E
$.0
$0 '
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$833,490
$0
$0
$0
$0
08:M
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$833,490
$5,000
$5,000
$0
§0
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Bushard/Adams Water Qualitv Proiect
Project Limits: Frontage median on Bushard and Adams
Project Number: 14-HBCH-ECP-3732
Type of work (Tow): Environmental Cleanup
TOW'Description: Irrigation system retrofits to reduce runoff
Project Description: Retrofit asphalt frontage medians on Bushard Street
and Adams Avenue with bio-retention swales for
water quality.
t3/24 >
Estimated Cost
-
Projected
$0 -
$0 -
$0_..-. _. ..
$0
$0
$0
$0
$833,490
$851,827
30
$10000
$10,000
$0
$843.490
$ 861,827
'UND NAME
PERCENT .'.
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECTED COST : NOTES>
3asTax
35.28
$21.169
$21,169
3eneral Fund
6.58
$3,949
$3,949
N2 ECP Tier II
58.14
$34,882
$34,882
$60,000
$60,000
ProiecfPltase
17119
18/19
_
19/20
20121
_
21122
22123
23/24
E
$p
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
s0
s0
s0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$12.000
$12,000
$12.000
$12,000
$12,000
$0
$0
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
so
$0
Estimated Cost
Pro ected
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$60,000
$60,000
$60,000
$ 60,000
Measure M 5
6/6/2017
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: City of Huntnaton Beach Seasonal Transit Circulator
Project Limits: Citywide
Project Number 16-HBCH-CBT-3826
Type of Work (Tow): Transit
TOW Description: New Service
ProjectDescription: Provide Seasonal Transit Service by adding
additional free local shuttle service connections
within the City from Memorial Day to Labor Day and
selected weekends.
:UND NAME PERC N ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST < NOTES
ieneral Fund 10.00 $73,529 $73,529
A2 Transit - V 90.00 $661,741 $661,741
$735,270 $735,270
19/19 `
19/20
02 121
21f22
22/23 `.
23124
Estimated Cost
Pieeated Cost
Pro"sect Phase
E
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
OEM
$122,545
$122.545
$122,545
$122,545
$122,545
$122,545
$0
$735,270
$735,270
$122,545
$122,546
$122,645
$122,545
$122,545
$122,645
$0
$735,270
$ 736,270
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Concrete ReDlacements
ProjectLimits: Citywide
Project Number.
Type ofwork (TOwj: Pedestrian
Tow Description. Reconstruction or rehabilitation of sidewalk
Project Description: Replace damaged concrete sidewalks or curb and
gutter throughout the City. This is annual program
with locations selected throughout Huntington Beach
at streets where an overlay Is required by PMP. This
project was an amendment to FY 15116 CIP.
UND'NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST 's—NOTES'>
,eneral Fund 100.00 $1,000,000 $1,033,487
$1,000,000 $1,033,487
Project Phase
17/18
L119
19/20 >
20121
21/22
22/23
23/24
Estimated Cost
Prorected Cost
E
R
CA
08M
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$0
s0
$0
$250,000
$0
$o
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
s0
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$0
so
$1,033,487
$0
$260,000
$250,000
$250,000
$260,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$ 1,033,487
Measure M 6
6/612017
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: First Street Diversion
Project omits: First Street near Pacific Coast Highway
Project Number. 12-HBCH-ECP-3621
Type of work (TOW): Environmental Cleanup
low Description: Runoff Diver=n
Project Description: Design and install a SCADA system and flow Weir
for the First Street Urban Runoff Discharge Permit
with OCSD to protect water quality of City and
Pacific Ocean.
:UND NAME PERCENT .. ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
General Fund 100,00 $6,290 $6,290
$6,290 $6,290
Project Phase
17118
18/18
19120
217121
21/22
la
jUl —44 -
Estimated Cost
Proiectedi Cost
E
R
CA
O&M
$O
$0
$0
$1,258
$0
$0
$0
$1,258
$0
$0
$0
$1,258
$0
$0
$o
$1,258
$0
$0
so
$1,258
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,290
$0
$0
$0
$6,290
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$1,268
$1,258
$0
$0
$6,290
$ 6,290
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: General Street Maintenance for Public Works
Project Limits: Chywide
Project Number
Type of Work (TOW)-' Pedestrian
TOW Description: Reconstruction or rehabilitation of sidewalk
Project Description: Annual maintenance work for concrete, potholes
and failed asphalt, O&M of traffic signals,
replacement of striping and signage, including
engineering and inspection as needed on an annual
basis. This WoTlk was added as an amendment to FY
'UND NAME PER NT ' .[.. ESTIMATED COST PROJEC ED COST NOTES
A2 Fairshare 100.00 $8,400,000 $8,675,778
$8,400,000 $8,875,778
Project Phase
E
R
CA
0&M
17/18
$o
$0
$1400,000
$0
18119
$0
so
$1,400,000
$0
19120
— $o _
$0
$1,400,000
$0
20M
$0
$0
$1,400,000
$0
21/22
$0
$0
$1,400,000
$0
23
$o
$0
$1,400,000
$0
23/24
$0
$0
$0
$0
Estimated Cost
$0
s0
$8.400.000
so
Projected Cost
$0
$0
$8,875,778
$0
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$0
$8,400,000
$ 8,876,778
s/snon Measure M 7
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Goldenwest Street Traffic Signal Synchronization
and Communication Eauioment lJoorades
Project Limits: Goldenwest St. from State Route 22 to Pacific Coast
Hiahwav
Project Number. 11-OCTA-TSP-3554
Type of Work (TOW): Traffic Signals
Tow Description: Coordinate signals vwithin project limits
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure upgrades
including signal timing and installation of fiber optic
cable along Goldenwest Street. Muttijurisdictional
project includes Caltrans and City of Westminster.
UND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
A2 TSSP 78.02 $0 $0
kQMD 21.98 $0 $0
$0 $0
Proiect.Phase
17/18
18119
19 0
0 2 /21
21122
22n3 :
23/24
Estimated Cost
Proiected Cost
E
R
C/I
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
„$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
SO
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$ 0
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Huntinaton Beach Catch Basin Retrofit Proiect
Project Limits: City-wide
Project Number. 14-HBCH-ECP-3742
Type of Work (rOw): Environmental Cleanup
TOW Description: Catchment Retrofit
Project Description: Retrofit 84 existing catch basins with Bio Clean
Round Curb Inlet Filters.
LIND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
3eneral Fund 100.00 $25,000 $25,000
$25,000 $25,000
Pro'iet Phase
T7l.18
18/19
19@0
20/21
21/22
22/23
23n4
Estimated Cost
ProectedCost'
E
$0
$0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
s0
$0
$25,000
$25,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$25,000
$ 25,000
6r6r2017 Measure M 8
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Huntington Beach Northwest Catch Basin Retrofit
Proiect
Project Limits: City-wide in Northwest Part of City
Project Number. 13-HBCH-ECP-3687
Type or work (TOW►: Environmental Cleanup
TOW Description: Catchment Retrofit
Project Description: Retrofit 126 existing catch basins with Bic Clean
Round Curb Inlet Filters and Skimmer Box.
UND NAME PERCE ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
ieneral Fund 100.00 $25,000 $25,000
$25,000 $25,000
Project Phase
17l16
16/19
19120
20/21
21122
22123;;:
23/24
Estimated Cost
Projected Cost
E
R
CA
O&M
$0
$0
s0
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
s0
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$0.
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$25,000
$0
$0
$0
$25,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$6,000
$0
$0
$25,000
$ 25,000
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Huntinoton Harbour Marina Trash Skimmers
Project Limits: Various Locations within Huntington Harbour
Project Number. 16-HBCH-ECP-3852
tal Cleanu
Type of work (TOWI, Environmen p
TOW Description: Marina Trash Skimmer
Project Description: Marian Trash Skimmers will be installed in various
locations
UND NAME
PERCENT :`.
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECTED COST ' NOTES
12 ECP Tier
75.00
$0
$0
;eneral Fund
12.50
$0
$0
)ther
12.50
$0
$0 Donations County
$0
$0
Proiect Phase
17118
18119
19/2.0
20J21
21122
23/24
Estimated Cost
Projected Cost
E
R
CA
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
s0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$ 0
Measure M s
6/6/2017
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Magnolia Street Svnchronization
Projectlimits: from Garfield Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
Project Number. 16-OCTA-TSP-3795
Type of Work (TOW): Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastrucWre improvements
UND NAME
PERCENT
ESTIMATED COST
PROJECTED COST NOTES i.
3eneral Fund
1,36
$10,000
$10,217
A2 TSSP
7142
$524,364
$535,743
'.QMD
27.21
$199,789
$204,124
$734,153
$750,084
Prdiect Phase
1711 B
81 119 1
20121
21/22
22/23
cl. ..
23124
Estimated Cost
Proieded Cost
E
$0; :
$0
$0
$0
$0
$O
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$724,153
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$724,153
$740,084
O&M
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$10,000
$10.000
$0
$724,163
$5,000
$6,000
$0
$0
$0
$734,153
$ 750,094
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: McFadden/Edwards and HeiVAlgonquin Catch Basin FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMA ,IIZC0 PROJECTED COST' NOTES
Retrofit Prolect General Fund 100.00 $25,375 $25,375
Project Limits: City-wide $25,376 $25,375
Project Number. 11-HBCH-ECP-3573
Type of Work (TOW): Environmental Cleanup
TOW Description: Automatic Retractable Screen and other debris
screens or inserts
Project Description: Provide maintenance for catch basin screens.
Protect Phase
17/18
18719
19/20
20Y11
2If22
2=3
_
23l24
Estimated Cost
Proiected Cost -:
E
$0
$0
$0`
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
s0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
$0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$5.075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$0
$0
$25,375
$25,375
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,076
$0
$0
$25,376
$ 25,376
6/6/2017 Measure M 10
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Residential Curb Ramo Proiect
Project Limits: Ramps to be installed throughout City
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOM, Pedestrian
TOW Description: Installation of ADA access ramps
Project Description: Install ADA Access Ramps. This is an annual
project that will install Ramps at locations where we
are providing an overlay to adjacent street. This
project was an amendment to FY 15116 CIP.
-UND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
,DBG 100.00 $1,650.000 $1,741,757
3as Tax 0.00 $0 $0
$1,660,000 $1,741,757
Project Phase
..._-
17H8
18/19
19/20
_ 20J21
21/22
22/23
23/24 ::
Estimated Cost
Protected Cast
E
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5000
$0
$30,000
$30,000
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$270,000
$270,000
$270.000
$270,000
$270000
$270,000
$0
$1,620,000
$1,711,757
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$0
$1,650,000
$1,741,757
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Residential Overtav
Project Limits: Citywide
Project Number
Type of Work (TOW): Road Maintenance
TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description: Provide cold mill and overlay of various streets
throughout Huntington Beach. This annual project
will provide street overlay rehabiliation based on the
PIMP ratings. This project was an amendment to FY
15116 CIP.
:UND NAME
PERCENT
ESTIMATED COST _
'PROJECTED COST NOTES
;as Tax
100.00
$8,400,000
$6,679,948
ether
0.00
$0
$0
ither
0.00
$0
$0
$8,400,000
$8,679,948
j'roteCl Phase:
17/'18
18119_
19/20
- -20/21
29122.22/23
23/24 '
Estimated Cost :
Projected Cost
E
$10.000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$0
$0
$0
$40,000
$40,000
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$2,090,000
$2,090,000
$2,090,000
$2,090,000
$0
so
$0
$8.360,000
$6,639,948
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,100,000
$2,100,000
$2,100,000
$2,100,000
$0
$0
$0
$8,400,000
$ 9,679,948
6/6/2017 Measure M 11
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Utica Bicycle Boulevard from Main Street to Beach
Boulevard
Project Limits: Utica Avenue from Main Street to Beach Boulevard
Project Number.
Type of Work (TOM: Bikeways
TOW Description: Widening of existing bike route
Project Description: Construct improvements to create a'Biicycle
Boulevard", where bicycling is empasized over
motor vehicle use. Project includes a new traffic
signal, curb bulb -outs, signing & striping
improvements. This project is a carryover from
n ,c FV I VIA r:IP
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2017/2018 through 2023/2024
FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES
Prop 42 0.00 $0 $0
BCIP 100.00 $0 $0
$0 $0
Protect Phase
17I18
18119
9120
20121
21122
22/23
23f24 ::
Estimated Cost
"
Protected Cost
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
S0
$0
$0..:.
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
C/1
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$0
$0
s0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$a
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$ 0
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Warner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization and
Communication Eouioment Uoarade
Project Limits: Warner Avenue from Paciflc Coast Hwy to Red Hill
Avenue
Project Number: 11-0CTA-TSP-3558
Type of work (TOW): Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Coordinate signals within project limits
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure upgrades
including signal timing and installation of fiber optic
along Warner Avenue. Multijurisdictional project
includes Caltrans and Cities of Fountain Valley,
Santa Ana and Tustin.
Project Phase
17/18
18119 ;
19/20 '
02 J21
21122
:7ZM3
32 !24
Estimated Cost -
Proiected Cost
E
$0
$0
$0
$0 '
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$o
$0
$0
$o
$o
$o
$ o
Res. No. 2017-33
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a Regular meeting thereof held on August 7, 2017 by the following vote:
AYES: O'Connell, Semeta, Posey, Delgleize, Hardy, Brenden, Peterson
NOES: None
n = ."M IM1111111111111 ffew-21.
RECUSE: None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California
ATTACHMENT #2
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. 3
J U LY 24, 2006
AMENDED:
November 9, 2012
November 25, 2013
December 14, 2015 (corrected March 14, 2016)
Orange County Local Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
Tel: (714) 560-6282
213669.10
HB -123- Item 11. - 16
Measure M2 Amendments
Transportation Investment Plan Amendments
1, November 9, 2012
• Reallocation of Funds within Freeway Program Between SR-91 and 1-405
2. December 14, 2015 (corrected March 14, 2016)
• Closeout of Project T and Reallocation of Remaining Funds within Transit
Program between Metrolink Service Expansion (Project R) and Fare
Stabilization Program (Project U). Corrected amendment language was
presented to the Board on March 14, 2016.
Ordinance Amendment
1. November 25, 2013
• Strengthens the eligibility and selection process for TOC members to
prevent any person with a financial conflict of interest from serving as a
member. Also requires currently elected or appointed officers who are
applying to serve on the TOC to complete an "Intent to Resign" form.
2. December 14, 2015 (corrected March 14, 2016)
• Accounts for additional funding from Project T allocated to the Fare
Stabilization Program by changing Attachment B language to reflect a
1.47% delegation (rather than 1 %) of Project U funding towards Fare
Stabilization. Corrected amendment language was presented to the Board
on March 14, 2016.
21;664.10
Item 11. - 17 hB - ,--
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ordinance No. 3 Page
Preamble...............................................................................................1
Section1. Title......................................................................................... 1
Section 2. Summary ................................................................................2
Section 3. Imposition of Retail Transactions and Use Tax ...................... 2
Section 4. Purposes................................................................................ 2
Section 5. Bonding Authority................................................................... 3
Section 6. Maintenance of Effort Requirements ...................................... 3
Section 7. Administration......................................................................... 4
Section 8. Annual Appropriations Limit .................................................... 4
Section 9. Effective and Operative Dates ................................................ 5
Section 10. Safeguards of Use of Revenues ............................................. 5
Section 11. Ten -Year Comprehensive Program Review ........................... 6
Section 12. Amendments.......................................................................... 6
Section 13. Request for Election............................................................... 7
Section 14. Effect on Ordinance No. 2...................................................... 8
Section 15. Severability.............................................................................8
ATTACHMENT A — Renewed Measure M
Transportation Investment Plan ................................... A-1
ATTACHMENT B - Allocation of Net Revenues
Section I. Definitions............................................................................... B-1
213669.10
HB -125- Item 11. - 18
Section II. Requirements......................................................................... B-4
Section III. Requirements for Eligible Jurisdictions ................................... B-7
Section IV. Allocation of Net Revenues; General Provisions .................... B-10
Section V. Allocation of Net Revenues; Streets and
Roads Programs/Projects....................................................... B-12
Section VI. Allocation of Net Revenues; Transit Programs/
Projects.................................................................................. B-14
Section VII. Allocation of Net Revenues; Environmental Cleanup
Projects.................................................................................. B-17
ATTACHMENT C - Taxpayer Oversight Committee
Section I. Purpose and Organization...................................................... C-1
Section II. Committee Membership......................................................... C-1
Section III. Appointment of Members....................................................... C-2
Section IV. Duties and Responsibilities.................................................... C-4
111669.10
Item 11. - 19 HB -126-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance No. 3
Renewed Measure M Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan
PREAMBLE
A. Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 180050, the Orange
County Transportation Authority ("Authority") has been designated as the Orange County
Local Transportation Authority by the Orange County Board of Supervisors.
B. There has been adopted a countywide transportation expenditure plan,
referred to as the Orange County Transportation Investment Plan, dated July 24, 2006,
pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 180206 ("Plan"), which will be
administered by the Authority.
C. The Plan provides for needed countywide transportation facility and service
improvements which will be funded, in part, by a transactions and use tax of one-half of one
percent (1/2%).
D. Local Transportation Ordinance Number 2 ("Ordinance No. 2") funds
transportation facility and service improvements through a transactions and use tax of one-
half of one percent (1/2%) that will be imposed through March 31, 2011.
E. Ordinance No. 3 ("Ordinance") provides for the continuation of the existing
Ordinance No. 2 transactions and use tax of one-half of one percent (1/2%) for an
additional period of thirty (30) years to fund transportation facility and service
improvements.
SECTION 1. TITLE
The Ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the Renewed Measure M
Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan. The word "Ordinance," as used in the
Ordinance, shall mean and include Attachment A entitled "Renewed Measure M
Transportation Investment Plan," Attachment B entitled "Allocation of Net Revenues," and
Attachment C entitled "Taxpayer Oversight Committee," which Attachments A, B and C are
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
'1;671.11
NB -127-
Item 11. - 20
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 2. SUMMARY
The Ordinance provides for the implementation of the Orange County Transportation
Investment Plan, which will result in countywide transportation improvements for freeways,
highways, local streets and roads, bus and rail transit, transportation -related water quality
("Environmental Cleanup"), and transit services for seniors and disabled persons. These
needed improvements will be funded by the continuation of the one-half of one percent
1(1/2%) transaction and use tax for a period of thirty years. The revenues shall be deposited
in a special fund and used solely for the identified improvements authorized by the
Ordinance.
SECTION 3. IMPOSITION OF RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX
Subject to approval by the electors, the Authority hereby imposes, in the
incorporated and unincorporated territories of Orange County ("County"), in accordance
with the provisions of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the
California Revenue and Taxation Code and Division 19 (commencing with Section 180000)
of the California Public Utilities Code, continuance of the existing retail transactions and
use tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (1/2%) commencing April 1, 2011, for a period
of thirty years. This tax shall be in addition to any other taxes authorized by law, including
any existing or future state or local sales tax or transactions and use tax. The imposition,
administration and collection of the tax shall be in accordance with all applicable statutes,
laws, rules and regulations prescribed and adopted by the State Board of Equalization.
SECTION 4. PURPOSES
All of the gross revenues generated from the transactions and use tax plus any
interest or other earnings thereon (collectively, "Revenues"), after the deduction for: (i)
amounts payable to the State Board of Equalization for the performance of functions
incidental to the administration and operation of the Ordinance, (ii) costs for the
administration of the Ordinance as provided herein, (iii) two percent (2%) of the Revenues
annually allocated for Environmental Cleanup and (iv) satisfaction of debt service
requirements of all bonds issued pursuant to the Ordinance that are not satisfied out of
K
11-1,71.11
Item 11. - 21
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
separate allocations, shall be defined as "Net Revenues" and shall be allocated solely for
the transportation purposes described in the Ordinance.
SECTION 5. BONDING AUTHORITY
"Pay as you go" financing is the preferred method of financing transportation
improvements and operations under the Ordinance. However, the Authority may use bond
financing as an alternative method if the scope of planned expenditures makes "pay as you
go" financing unfeasible. Following approval by the electors of the ballot proposition
authorizing imposition of the transactions and use tax and authorizing issuance of bonds
payable from the proceeds of the tax, bonds may be issued by the Authority pursuant to
Division 19 of the Public Utilities Code, at any time before, on, or after the imposition of
taxes, and from time to time, payable from the proceeds of the tax and secured by a pledge
of revenues from the proceeds of the tax, in order to finance and refinance improvements
authorized by the Ordinance.
SECTION 6. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENTS
It is the intent of the Legislature and the Authority that the Net Revenues allocated to
a jurisdiction pursuant to the Ordinance for street and road projects shall be used to
supplement existing local discretionary funds being used for transportation improvements.
Each jurisdiction is hereby required to annually maintain as a minimum no less than the
maintenance of effort amount of local discretionary funds required to be expended by the
jurisdiction for local street and road purposes pursuant to the current Ordinance No. 2 for
Fiscal Year 2010-2011. The maintenance of effort level for each jurisdiction as determined
through this process shall be adjusted effective July 1, 2014 and every three fiscal years
thereafter in an amount equal to the percentage change for the Construction Cost Index
compiled by Caltrans for the immediately preceding three calendar years, providing that
any percentage increase in the maintenance of effort level based on this adjustment shall
not exceed the percentage increase in the growth rate in the jurisdiction's general fund
revenues over the same time period. The Authority shall not allocate any Net Revenues to
any jurisdiction for any fiscal year until that jurisdiction has certified to the Authority that it
HB -1?9-
3
Item 11. - 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
has included in its budget for that fiscal year an amount of local discretionary funds for
I streets and roads purposes at least equal to the level of its maintenance of effort
I requirement. An annual independent audit may be conducted by the Authority to verify that
the maintenance of effort requirements are being met by the jurisdiction. Any Net
Revenues not allocated pursuant to the maintenance of effort requirement shall be
allocated to the remaining eligible jurisdictions according to the formula described in the
I Ordinance.
SECTION 7. ADMINISTRATION
The Authority shall allocate Revenues to fund facilities, services and projects as
specified in the Ordinance, and shall administer the Ordinance consistent with the authority
cited. Revenues may be expended by the Authority for salaries, wages, benefits, and
overhead and for those services, including contractual services, necessary to carry out its
responsibilities pursuant to Division 19; however, in no case shall the Revenues expended
for salaries and benefits of Authority administrative staff exceed more than one percent
(1 %) of the Revenues in any year. The Authority shall use, to the extent possible, existing
state, regional and local transportation planning and programming data and expertise, and
may, as the law permits, contract with any public agency or private firm for services
necessary to carry out the purposes of the Ordinance. Expenses incurred by the Authority
for administrative staff and for project implementation, including contracting with public
agencies and private firms, shall be identified in the annual report prepared pursuant to
Section 10, subpart 8, of the Ordinance.
SECTION 8. ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
The annual appropriations limit established pursuant to Article XIII. B. of the
California Constitution and Section 180202 of the Public Utilities Code shall be established
as $1,123 million for the 2006-07 fiscal year. The appropriations limit shall be subject to
adjustment as provided by law. All expenditures of the Revenues are subject to the
appropriations limit of the Authority.
I/A
Item 11. - 23
11
HB -130-
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE AND OPERATIVE DATES
The Ordinance shall be effective on November 8, 2006, if two thirds of the electors
vote on November 7, 2006, to approve the ballot measure authorizing the extension of the
imposition of the existing tax. The continuance of the imposition of the existing tax
authorized by Section 3 of the Ordinance shall be operative on April 1, 2011.
SECTION 10. SAFEGUARDS OF USE OF REVENUES
The following safeguards are hereby established to ensure strict adherence to the
I limitations on the use of the Revenues:
1. A transportation special revenue fund (the "Local Transportation
Authority Special Revenue Fund") shall be established to maintain all Revenues.
2. The County of Orange Auditor -Controller ("Auditor -Controller"), in the
capacity as Chair of the Taxpayer Oversight Committee, shall annually certify whether the
Revenues have been spent in compliance with the Ordinance.
3. Receipt, maintenance and expenditure of Net Revenues shall be
distinguishable in each jurisdiction's accounting records from other funding sources, and
expenditures of Net Revenues shall be distinguishable by program or project. Interest
earned on Net Revenues allocated pursuant to the Ordinance shall be expended only for
those purposes for which the Net Revenues were allocated.
4. No Net Revenues shall be used by a jurisdiction for other than
transportation purposes authorized by the Ordinance. Any jurisdiction which violates this
provision must fully reimburse the Authority for the Net Revenues misspent and shall be
deemed ineligible to receive Net Revenues for a period of five (5) years.
5. A Taxpayer Oversight Committee ("Committee") shall be established to
provide an enhanced level of accountability for expenditure of Revenues under the
Ordinance. The Committee will help to ensure that all voter mandates are carried out as
required. The roles and responsibilities of the Committee, the selection process for
Committee members and related administrative procedures shall be carried out as
described in Attachment C.
2 1367 1.11
HB-1)1-
5
Item 11. - 24
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6. A performance assessment shall be conducted at least once every
I three years to evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, economy and program results of the
Authority in satisfying the provisions and requirements of the Investment Summary of the
Plan, the Plan and the Ordinance. A copy of the performance assessment shall be
provided to the Committee.
7. Quarterly status reports regarding the major projects detailed in the
Plan shall be brought before the Authority in public meetings.
8. Annually the Authority shall publish a report on how all Revenues have
been spent and on progress in implementing projects in the Plan, and shall publicly report
on the findings.
SECTION 11. TEN-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW
At least every ten years the Authority shall conduct a comprehensive review of all
projects and programs implemented under the Plan to evaluate the performance of the
overall program and may revise the Plan to improve its performance. The review shall
include consideration of changes to local, state and federal transportation plans and
policies; changes in land use, travel and growth projections; changes in project cost
estimates and revenue projections; right-of-way constraints and other project constraints;
level of public support for the Plan; and the progress of the Authority and jurisdictions in
implementing the Plan. The Authority may amend the Plan based on its comprehensive
review, subject to the requirements of Section 12.
6yX"[e7ilk iF"MOVA Ia0191IVAIaftr001
The Authority may amend the Ordinance, including the Plan, to provide for the use
of additional federal, state and local funds, to account for unexpected revenues, or to take
into consideration unforeseen circumstances. The Authority shall notify the board of
supervisors and the city council of each city in the county and provide them with a copy of
the proposed amendments, and shall hold a public hearing on proposed amendments prior
to adoption, which shall require approval by a vote of not less than two thirds of the
Authority Board of Directors. Amendments shall become effective forty five days after
n.
i """I.I I
Item 11. - 25
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
adoption. No amendment to the Plan which eliminates a program or project specified on
Page 31 of the Plan shall be adopted unless the Authority Board of Directors adopts a
finding that the transportation purpose of the program or project to be eliminated will be
satisfied by a different program or project. No amendment to the Plan which changes the
funding categories, programs or projects identified on page 31 of the Plan shall be adopted
unless the amendment to the Plan is first approved by a vote of not less than two thirds of
the Committee. In addition, any proposed change in allocations among the four major
funding categories of freeway projects, street and road projects, transit projects and
Environmental Cleanup projects identified on page 31 of the Plan, or any proposed change
of the Net Revenues allocated pursuant to Section IV C 3 of Attachment B for the Local
Fair Share Program portion of the Streets and Roads Projects funding category, shall be
approved by a simple majority vote of the electors before going into effect.
SECTION 13. REQUEST FOR ELECTION
Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 180201, the Authority hereby
requests that the County of Orange Board of Supervisors call a special election to be
conducted by the County of Orange on November 7, 2006, to place the Ordinance before
the electors. To avoid any misunderstanding or confusion by Orange County electors, the
Authority requests that the Ordinance be identified as "Measure M" on the ballot. The ballot
language for the measure shall contain a summary of the projects and programs in the Plan
and shall read substantially as follows:
"Measure "M," Orange County Transportation Improvement Plan
Shall the ordinance continuing Measure M, Orange County's half -cent sales tax for
transportation improvements, for an additional 30 years with limited bonding authority to
fund the following projects:
relieve congestion on the 1-5, 1-405, 22, 55, 57 and 91 freeways;
fix potholes and resurface streets;
expand Metrolink rail and connect it to local communities;
provide transit services, at reduced rates, for seniors and disabled persons;
'1;671.11
HB -133-
Item 11. - 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IM
synchronize traffic lights in every community;
reduce air and water pollution, and protect local beaches by cleaning up oil runoff
from roadways;
and establish the following taxpayer protections to ensure the funds are spent as directed
by the voters:
require an independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to review yearly audits to
ensure that voter mandates are met;
publish an annual report to the taxpayers on how all funds are spent; and
update the transportation improvement plan every 10 years, with voter approval
required for major changes;
be adopted for the purpose of relieving traffic congestion in Orange County?"
SECTION 14. EFFECT ON ORDINANCE NO. 2
The Ordinance is not intended to modify, repeal or alter the provisions of Ordinance
No. 2, and shall not be read to supersede Ordinance No. 2. The provisions of the
Ordinance shall apply solely to the transactions and use tax adopted herein. If the
Ordinance is not approved by the electors of the County, the provisions of Ordinance No. 2
and all powers, duties, and actions taken thereunder shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 15. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, part, clause or phrase of the Ordinance is for any reason
held invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, that
holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining funds or provisions of
the Ordinance, and the Authority declares that it would have passed each part of the
II '1-671.11
Item 11. - 27
11
HB -1 4-
8
1
2
3
4
6
6'
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance irrespective of the validity of any other part.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Orange County Local Transportation Authority
on the r)1 day of < 2006.
i
Arthur C. Brown, Chairman
Orange County Local Transportation
Authority
ATTEST:
By:
Wendy Kna` les, Clerk of the Board
Orange County Local Transportation Authority
HB -135-
Item 11. - 28
ATTACHMENT A
Approved by voters on November 7, 2006
As amended on December 14, 201 5
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
550 South Main Street
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
(714) 560-5066
www.octa.net
It Updated March 14, 2016
Item 11. - 29 ® HB -136
Table of Contents
Introduction............................................................................................2
Overview................................................................................................3
Freeway Projects
Overview..................................................................................................................5
Orange County Freeway Projects Map...............................................................6
1-5 Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements ...........................7
1-5 Santa Ana/San Diego Freeway Improvements .............................8
SR-22 Garden Grove Freeway Access Improvements .............................9
SR-55 Costa Mesa Freeway Improvements...............................................9
SR-57 Orange Freeway Improvements.....................................................10
SR-91 Riverside Freeway Improvements..................................................11
1-405 San Diego Freeway Improvements.................................................13
1-605 Freeway Access Improvements........................................................15
All Freeway Service Patrol.....................................................................15
Streets & Roads Projects
Overview................................................................................................................16
Orange County Streets and Roads Projects Map...........................................17
Regional Capacity Program...............................................................................18
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program..........................................19
Local Fair Share Program...................................................................................20
Transit Projects
Overview................................................................................................................21
Orange County Transit Projects Map................................................................22
High Frequency Metrolink Service....................................................................23
Transit Extensions to Metrolink...........................................................................23
MetrolinkGateways..............................................................................................24
Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities ............
24
Community Based Transit/Circulators...............................................................25
SafeTransit Stops.................................................................................................25
Environmental Cleanup
Overview................................................................................................................26
ProjectDescription...............................................................................................27
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
Overview........ .................................. .................................. ..........:........ .................
28
Description..............................................................................................................29
MeasureM Investment Summary........................................................31
Measure M Promises Fulfilled
On November 6, 1990, Orange County voters
approved Measure M, a half -cent local transportation
sales tax for twenty years. All of the major projects
promised to and approved by the voters are
underway or complete. Funds that go to cities and
the County of Orange to maintain and improve
local street and roads, along with transit fare
reductions for seniors and persons with disabilities,
will continue until Measure M ends in 2011. The
promises made in Measure M have been fulfilled.
Continued Investment Needed
Orange County continues to grow. By the year 2030,
Orange County's population will increase by 24
percent from 2.9 million in 2000 to 3.6 million in
2030; jobs will increase by 27 percent; and travel
on our roads and highways by 39 percent. Without
continued investment average morning rush hour
speeds on Orange County freeways will fall by
31 percent and on major streets by 32 percent.
Responding to this continued growth and broad
support for investment in Orange County's
transportation system, the Orange County
Transportation Authority considered the
transportation projects and programs that would be
possible if Measure M were renewed. The Authority,
together with the 34 cities of Orange County, the
Orange County Board of Supervisors and thousands
of Orange County citizens, participated during the
last eighteen months in developing a Transportation
Investment Plan for consideration by the voters.
A Plan for New Transportation Investments
The Plan that follows is a result of those efforts. It
reflects the varied interests and priorities inherent
in the diverse communities of Orange County. It
includes continued investment to expand and
improve Orange County's freeway system;
commitment to maintaining and improving the
network of streets and roads in every community;
an expansion of Metrolink rail service through the
core of Orange County with future extensions to
connect with nearby communities and regional
rail systems; more transit service for seniors and
disabled persons; and funds to clean up runoff
from roads that leads to beach closures.
Strong Safeguards
These commitments are underscored by a set of
strong taxpayer safeguards to ensure that promises
made in the Plan are kept. They include an annual
independent audit and report to the taxpayers;
ongoing monitoring and review of spending by
an independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee;
requirement for full public review and update of
the Plan every ten years; voter approval for any
major changes to the Plan; strong penalties for
any misuse of funds and a strict limit of no more
than one percent for administrative expenses.
No Increase in Taxes
The traffic improvements detailed in this plan do
not require an increase in taxes. Renewal of the
existing Measure M one-half cent transportation
sales tax will enable all of the projects and
programs to be implemented. And by using good
planning and sensible financing, projects that
are ready to go could begin as early as 2007.
Renewing Measure M
The projects and programs that follow constitute
the Transportation Investment Plan for the
renewal of the Measure M transportation sales tax
approved by Orange County voters in November
of 1990. These improvements are necessary to
address current and future transportation needs
in Orange County and reflect the best efforts
to achieve consensus among varied interests
and communities throughout the County.
Item 11. - 31 HB -138-
3
The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan is a 30-year, $11.8 billion program designed to
reduce traffic congestion, strengthen our economy
and improve our quality of life by upgrading
key freeways, fixing major freeway interchanges,
maintaining streets and roads, synchronizing traffic
signals countywide, building a visionary rail transit
system, and protecting our environment from the oily
street runoff that pollutes Orange County beaches.
The Transportation Investment Plan is focused solely
on improving the transportation system and includes
tough taxpayer safeguards, including a Taxpayer
Oversight Committee, required annual audits,
and regular, public reports on project progress.
The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan must be reviewed annually, in public session,
and every ten years a detailed review of the Plan
must take place. If changing circumstances require
the voter -approved plan to be changed, those
changes must be taken to the voters for approval.
Freeways
Relieving congestion on the Riverside/Artesia
Freeway (SR-91) is the centerpiece of the freeway
program, and will include new lanes, new
interchanges, and new bridges. Other major projects
will make substantial improvements on Interstate
5 (I-5) in southern Orange County and the San
Diego Freeway (1-405) in western Orange County.
The notorious Orange Crush —the intersection of
the I-5, the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) and the
Orange Freeway (SR-57) near Angel Stadium —will
be improved and upgraded. Under the Plan, major
traffic chokepoints on almost every Orange County
freeway will be remedied. Improving Orange
County freeways will be the greatest investment
in the Renewed Measure M program: Forty-
three percent of net revenues, or $4.871 billion,
will be invested in new freeway construction.
Streets and Roads
More than 6,500 lane miles of aging streets and roads
will need repair, rejuvenation and improvement.
City streets and county roads need to be maintained
regularly and potholes have to be filled quickly.
Thirty-two percent of net revenue from the Renewed
Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, or
$3.625 billion, will be devoted to fixing potholes,
improving intersections, synchronizing traffic signals
countywide, and making the existing countywide
network of streets and roads safer and more efficient.
HB -139-
Item 11. - 32
g
i
� t
CL:
Public Transit
program, or $118.6 million over 30 years, will
As Orange County continues to grow, building a
pay for annual, independent audits, taxpayer
visionary rail transportation system that is safe,
safeguards, an independent Taxpayer Oversight
clean and convenient, uses and preserves existing
Committee assigned to watchdog government
rights -of -way, and, over time, provides high-speed
spending, and a full, public disclosure of all Renewed
connections both inside and outside of Orange
Measure M expenditures. A detailed review of the
County, is a long term goal. Twenty-five percent
program must be conducted every ten years and,
of the net revenue from Renewed Measure M, or
if needed, major changes in the investment plan
$2.83 billion, will be dedicated to transit programs
must be brought before Orange County voters for
countywide. About twenty percent, or $2.24 billion,
approval. Taxpayers will receive an annual report
will be dedicated to creating a new countywide
detailing the Renewed Measure M expenditures.
high capacity transit system anchored on the
Additionally, as required by law, an estimated one
existing, successful Metrolink and Amtrak rail line,
and a half percent of the sales taxes generated, or
and about five percent, or $591 million, will be
$178 million over 30 years, must be paid to the
used to enhance senior transportation programs
California State Board of Equalization for collecting
and provide targeted, safe localized bus service.
the one-half cent sales tax that funds the Renewed
Measure M Transportation Investment Plan.
Environmental Cleanup
Every day, more than 70 million gallons of oily
In this pamphlet, every specific project, program,
pollution, litter, and dirty contaminants wash off
and safeguard included in the Renewed Measure
streets, roads, and freeways and pour onto Orange
M Transportation Investment Plan is explained.
County waterways and beaches. When it rains, the
Similar details will be provided to every Orange
transportation -generated beach and ocean pollution
County voter if the measure is placed on the ballot.
increases tenfold. Under the plan, two percent
of the gross Renewed Measure M Transportation
Investment Plan, or $237 million, will be dedicated
to protecting Orange County beaches from this
transportation -generated pollution (sometimes called
"urban runoff") while improving ocean water quality.
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
When new transportation dollars are approved,
they should go for transportation and transportation
purposes alone. No bait -and -switch. No using
transportation dollars for other purposes. The
original Measure M went solely for transportation
purposes. The Renewed Measure M must be just
as airtight. One percent of the gross Measure M
-4a
Item 11. - 33 HB -1 40-
5
s �itc�
y_ ProjectsFreeway
Every day, traffic backs up somewhere on the near Angel Stadium —is in need of a major face lift.
Orange County freeway system. And, every day, And the intersection of Interstate 5 and the Costa
freeway traffic seems to get a little worse. Mesa Freeway (SR-55) is also slated for major repair.
In the past decade, Orange County has made major Pays Big Dividends
strides in re -building our aging freeway system. Local investment in freeways also pays big dividends
But there is still an enormous amount of work in the search for other needed freeway dollars.
that needs to be done to make the freeway system Because of state and federal matching rules, Orange
work well. You see the need for improvement every County's local investment in freeway projects acts
time you drive on an Orange County freeway as a magnet for state and federal transportation
dollars —pulling more freeway construction
Forty-three percent of net revenues from the dollars into the county and allowing more traffic -
Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan reducing freeway projects to be built sooner.
is dedicated to improving Orange County freeways,
the largest portion of the 30-year transportation plan. Innovative Environmental Mitigation
A minimum of $243.5 million will be available,
SR-91 is the Centerpiece subject to a Master Agreement, to provide for
Making the troubled Riverside/Artesia Freeway comprehensive, rather than piecemeal, mitigation of
(SR-91) work again is the centerpiece of the the environmental impacts of freeway improvements.
Renewed Measure M Freeway program. The fix Using a proactive, innovative approach, the
on the SR-91 will require new lanes, new bridges, Master Agreement negotiated between the Orange
new overpasses, and, in the Santa Ana Canyon County Local Transportation Authority and
portion of the freeway, a diversion of drivers to the state and federal resource agencies will provide
Foothill Corridor (SR-241) so the rest of the Orange higher -value environmental benefits such as
County freeway system can work more effectively habitat protection, wildlife corridors and resource
preservation in exchange for streamlined project
And there's more to the freeway program than the approvals for the freeway program as a whole.
fix of SR-91—much more. More than $1 billion
is earmarked for Interstate 5 in South County. Freeway projects will also be planned, designed
More than $800 million is slated to upgrade the and constructed with consideration for their
San Diego Freeway (1-405) between Irvine and aesthetic, historic and environmental impacts
the Los Angeles County line. Another significant on nearby properties and communities using
investment is planned on the congested Costa such elements as parkway style designs, locally
Mesa Freeway (SR-55). And needed projects native landscaping, sound reduction and aesthetic
designed to relieve traffic chokepoints are planned treatments that complement the surroundings.
for almost every Orange County freeway.
To make any freeway system work, bottlenecks at
interchanges also have to be fixed. The notorious
Orange Crush Interchange —where the Santa Ana
Freeway (1-5) meets the Orange Freeway (SR-57) and
the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) in a traffic tangle
HB -141- Item 11. - 34
Orange County Freeway Projects
{I-3j page 7" H I 'verside Freeway (SR-91)a
pn Diego freeway (1-5) page 87 -R sale Freeway (SR-91)
n Diego Feewcey (1-5) page 8 K L ° iego Freeway {I-405j
� r'(SR-22) page 9 M Freevr�► Access Improvements
page 11
page 12
page 13-14
page 15
aae 15
7
HB -143-
Item 11. - 36
8
13
Project 0
San Diego Freeway (1-5) Improvements
South of the El Toro "Y"
Description:
Add new lanes to I-5 from the vicinity of the El Toro
Interchange in Lake Forest to the vicinity of SR-73
in Mission Viejo. Also add new lanes on I-5 between
Coast Highway and Avenida Pico interchanges to
reduce freeway congestion in San Clemente. The
project will also make major improvements at local
interchanges as listed in Project D. The project
will generally be constructed within the existing
right-of-way. Specific improvements will be subject
to approved plans developed in cooperation with
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
The project will increase freeway capacity and
reduce congestion. Current traffic volume on I-5
near the El Toro "Y" is about 342,000 vehicles per
day. This volume will increase in the future by 35
percent, bringing it up to 460,000 vehicles per
day. Regional plans also include construction of a
new freeway access point between Crown Valley
Parkway and Avery Parkway as well as new off ramps
at Stonehill Drive using federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost to improve these
segments of I-5 is $627.0 million.
Project O
Santa Ana Freeway / San Diego Freeway (1-5)
Local Interchange Upgrades
Description:
Update and improve key I-5 interchanges such
as Avenida Pico, Ortega Highway, Avery Parkway,
La Paz Road, El Toro Road, and others to relieve
street congestion around older interchanges and
on ramps. Specific improvements will be subject
to approved plans developed in cooperation with
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
In addition to the project described above,
regional plans also include improvements to
the local interchanges at Camino Capistrano,
Oso Parkway, Alicia Parkway and Barranca
Parkway using federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost for the I-5 local
interchange upgrades is $258.0 million.
Item H. - 37 HB -144-
HB -145- Item 11. - 38
Item 11. - 39 HB -146-
11
HB - l 47-
Item 11. - 40
12
Project 0
Riverside Freeway (SR-91) Improvements
from Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) to
the Orange/ Riverside County Line
Description:
This project adds capacity on SR-91 beginning at
SR-55 and extending to 1-15 in Riverside County.
The first priority will be to improve the segment
of SR-91 east of SR-241. The goal is to provide
up to four new lanes of capacity between SR-241
and Riverside County Line by making best use
of available freeway property, adding reversible
lanes, building elevated sections and improving
connections to SR-241. These projects would be
constructed in conjunction with similar coordinated
improvements in Riverside County extending to
I-15 and provide a continuous set of improvements
between SR-241 and I-15. The portion of
improvements in Riverside County will be paid for
from other sources. Specific improvements will be
subject to approved plans developed in cooperation
with local jurisdictions and affected communities.
This project also includes improvements to the
segment of SR-91 between SR-241 and SR-55.
The concept is to generally add one new lane in
each direction and improve the interchanges.
Today, this freeway carries about 314,000 vehicles
every day. This volume is expected to increase by 36
percent, bringing it up to 426,000 vehicles by 2030.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these improvements
to the SR-91 is $352.0 million.
Item 11. - 41
HB -148-
Project cost estimate amended on November 9, 2012.
San Diego Freeway (1-405) Improvements
between the 1-605 Freeway in Los Alamitos
area and Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55)
Description:
Add new lanes to the San Diego Freeway between
I-605 and SR-55, generally within the existing right-
of-way. The project will make best use of available
freeway property, update interchanges and widen
all local overcrossings according to city and regional
master plans. The improvements will be coordinated
with other planned 1-405 improvements in the
I-405/SR-22/I-605 interchange area to the north
and I-405/SR-73 improvements to the south. The
improvements will adhere to recommendations of
the Interstate 405 Major Investment Study
(as adopted by the Orange County Transportation
Authority Board of Directors on October 14,
2005) and will be developed in cooperation with
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
Today, I-405 carries about 430,000 vehicles daily.
The volume is expected to increase by nearly 23
percent, bringing it up to 528,000 vehicles daily
by 2030. The project will increase freeway capacity
and reduce congestion. Near -term regional plans
also include the improvements to the 1-405/SR-73
interchange as well as a new carpool interchange
at Bear Street using federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these improvements
to the I-405 is $1,072.8 million.
Gr �'IYI�
G
Project cost estimate amended on Nove: - - - -
i•-1B -149- Item 11. - 42
14
Project 0
San Diego Freeway (1-405) Improvements
between Costa Mesa Freeway
(SR-55) and Santa Ana Freeway (1-5)
Description:
Add new lanes to the freeway from SR-55 to the
I-5. The project will also improve chokepoints
at interchanges and add merging lanes near on/
off ramps such as Lake Forest Drive, Irvine Center
Drive and SR-133 to improve the overall freeway
operations in the I-405/I-5 El Toro "Y" area. The
projects will generally be constructed within the
existing right-of-way. Specific improvements will be
subject to approved plans developed in cooperation
with local jurisdictions and affected communities.
This segment of the freeway carries 354,000
vehicles a day. This number will increase by
nearly 13 percent, bringing it up to 401,000
vehicles per day by 2030. The project will increase
freeway capacity and reduce congestion. In
addition to the projects described above, regional
plans include a new carpool interchange at Von
Karman Avenue using federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these improvements
to the I-405 is $319.7 million.
Item IL - 43 Hs -150-
15
t _Fre ways Projects
W-605 Freeway• •
t
Freeway• •
Project a Project 0
1-605 Freeway Access Improvements Freeway Service Patrol
Description: Description:
Improve freeway access and arterial connection The Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) provides
to I-605 serving the communities of Los Alamitos competitively bid, privately contracted tow
and Cypress. The project will be coordinated with truck service for motorists with disabled vehicles
other planned improvements along SR-22 and on the freeway system. This service helps
1-405. Specific improvements will be subject to stranded motorists and quickly clears disabled
approved plans developed in cooperation with vehicles out of the freeway lanes to minimize
local jurisdictions and affected communities. congestion caused by vehicles blocking traffic
and passing motorists rubbernecking.
Regional plans also include the addition of new
freeway -to -freeway carpool ramps to the 1-405/ Currently Freeway Service Patrol is available on
1-605 interchange using federal and state funds. Orange County freeways Monday through Friday
This improvement will connect to interchange during peak commuting hours. This project
improvements at I-405 and SR-22 as well as would assure that this basic level of service
new freeway lanes between I-405 and I-605. could be continued through 2041. As demand
and congestion levels increase, this project
Cost: would also permit service hours to be extended
The estimated cost to make these I-605 interchange throughout the day and into the weekend.
improvements is $20.0 million.
Cost:
The estimated cost to support the Freeway
Service Patrol Program for thirty years
beyond 2011 is $150.0 million.
i
HB -151- Item 11. - 44
16
Streets and Roads
Projects Overview
cc
Orange County has more than 6,500 lane miles Renewed Measure M provides financial incentives
of aging streets and roads, many of which are in for traffic improvements that cross city and
need of repair, rejuvenation and improvement. county lines, providing a seamless, county -
Intersections need to be widened, traffic lights wide transportation system that's friendly to
need to be synchronized, and potholes need to regional commuters and fair to local residents.
be filled. And, in many cases, to make Orange
County's transportation system work smoothly, we Better Cooperation
need to add additional lanes to existing streets. To place a higher priority on cooperative,
collaborative regional decision -making, Renewed
Thirty-two percent of net revenues from the Measure M creates incentives that encourage traffic
Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment lights to be coordinated across jurisdictional lines,
Plan is dedicated to maintaining streets, major street improvements to be better coordinated
fixing potholes, improving intersections and on a regional basis, and street repair programs to be
widening city streets and county roads. a high priority countywide. To receive Measure M
funding, cities and the county have to cooperate.
Making the System Work
Making the existing system of streets and roads The Streets and Roads program in Renewed
work better —by identifying spot intersection Measure M involves shared responsibilities —local
improvements, filling potholes, repaving worn- cities and the county set their local priorities
out streets —is the basis of making a countywide within a competitive, regional framework that
transportation system work. That basis has to be the rewards cooperation, honors best practices, and
first priority. But to operate a successful, countywide encourages government agencies to work together.
system of streets and roads, we need more:
street widenings and traffic signals synchronized
countywide. And there's more. Pedestrian safety
near local schools needs to be improved. Traffic flow
must be smoothed. Street repairs must be made
sooner. And, perhaps most importantly, cities and the
county must work together —collaboratively —to
find simple, low-cost traffic solutions.
i
I
Item 11. - 45 HB -152-
Orange County Streets and Roads Projects
f �\ y1ha ,
Santa
Regional Capacity Program page 18 Local Fair Share Program page 20
(not mapped) (not mapped)
Nearly 1,000 miles of new lanes Street maintenance and improvements
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program page 19
(see grid above)
Over 750 miles of roadway
Over 2,000 coordinated signals
• . Streets ant
Regional C
Project 0
Regional Capacity Program
Description:
This program, in combination with local matching
funds, provides a funding source to complete the
Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH). The program also provides for intersection
improvements and other projects to help improve
street operations and reduce congestion. The
program allocates funds through a competitive
process and targets projects that help traffic the most
by considering factors such as degree of congestion
relief, cost effectiveness, project readiness, etc.
Local jurisdictions must provide a dollar -for -dollar
match to qualify for funding, but can be rewarded
with lower match requirements if they give
priority to other key objectives, such as better road
maintenance and regional signal synchronization.
Roughly 1,000 miles of new street lanes remain
to be completed, mostly in the form of widening
existing streets to their ultimate planned width.
Completion of the system will result in a more
even traffic flow and efficient system.
Another element of this program is funding for
construction of railroad over or underpass grade
separations where high volume streets are impacted
by freight trains along the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe railroad in northern Orange County.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these street
improvement projects is $1,132.8 million.
Item 11. - 47 1--18 -15 -
Project 0
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program
Description:
This program targets over 2,000 signalized
intersections across the County for coordinated
operation. The goal is to improve the flow
of traffic by developing and implementing
regional signal coordination programs
that cross jurisdictional boundaries.
Most traffic signal synchronization programs today
are limited to segments of roads or individual cities
and agencies. For example, signals at intersections
of freeways with arterial streets are controlled
by Caltrans, while nearby signals at local street
intersections are under the control of cities. This
results in the street system operating at less than
maximum efficiency. When completed, this project
can increase the capacity of the street grid and
reduce the delay by over six million hours annually.
19
To ensure that this program is successful, cities, the
County of Orange and Caltrans will be required
to work together and prepare a common traffic
signal synchronization plan and the necessary
governance and legal arrangements before receiving
funds. In addition, cities will be required to
provide 20 percent of the costs. Once in place,
the program will provide funding for ongoing
maintenance and operation of the synchronization
plan. Local jurisdictions will be required to
publicly report on the performance of their signal
synchronization efforts at least every three years.
Signal equipment to give emergency vehicles
priority at intersections will be an eligible expense
for projects implemented as part of this program.
Cost:
The estimated cost of developing and maintaining
a regional traffic signal synchronization program
for Orange County is $453.1 million.
HB -155-
Item 11. - 48
20
Project 10
Local Fair Share Program
Description:
This element of the program will provide flexible
funding to help cities and the County of Orange keep
up with the rising cost of repairing the aging street
system. In addition, cities can use these funds for
other local transportation needs such as residential
street projects, traffic and pedestrian safety near
schools, signal priority for emergency vehicles, etc.
This program is intended to augment, rather than
replace, existing transportation expenditures
and therefore cities must meet the following
requirements to receive the funds.
1. Continue to invest General Fund monies
(or other local discretionary monies) for
transportation and annually increase this
commitment to keep pace with inflation.
2. Agree to use Measure M funds for
transportation purposes only, subject
to full repayment and a loss of funding
eligibility for five years for any misuse.
3. Agree to separate accounting for Measure
M funds and annual reporting on
actual Measure M expenditures.
4. Develop and maintain a Pavement
Management Program to ensure timely
street maintenance and submit regular
public reports on the condition of streets.
5. Annually submit a six -year Capital Improvement
Program and commit to spend Measure
M funds within three years of receipt.
6. Agree to assess traffic impacts of new
development and require that new
development pay a fair share of any
necessary transportation improvements.
7. Agree to plan, build and operate major
streets consistent with the countywide
Master Plan of Arterial Highways to ensure
efficient traffic flow across city boundaries.
8. Participate in Traffic Forums with neighboring
jurisdictions to facilitate the implementation and
maintenance of traffic signal synchronization
programs and projects. This requires cities to
balance local traffic policies with neighboring
cities —for selected streets —to promote
more efficient traffic circulation overall.
9. Agree to consider land use planning
strategies that are transit -friendly,
support alternative transportation modes
including bike and pedestrian access and
reduce reliance on the automobile.
The funds under this program are distributed to
cities and the County of Orange by formula once
the cities have fulfilled the above requirements. The
formula will account for population, street mileage
and amount of sales tax collected in each jurisdiction.
Cost:
The estimated cost for this program for
thirty years is $2,039.1 million.
Item 11. - 49 H B -156-
21
Building streets, roads and freeways helps fix
today's traffic problems. Building a visionary transit
system that is safe, clean and convenient focuses
on Orange County's transportation future.
Twenty-five percent of net revenues from the
Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan is allocated towards building and improving
rail and bus transportation in Orange County.
Approximately twenty percent of the Renewed
Measure M funds is allocated to developing a creative
countywide transit program and five percent of
the revenues will be used to enhance programs for
senior citizens and for targeted, localized bus service.
All transit expenditures must be consistent with
the safeguards and audit provisions of the Plan.
A New Transit Vision
The key element of the Renewed Measure M transit
program is improving the 100-year old Santa Fe
rail line, known today as the Los Angeles/San
Diego (LOSSAN) rail corridor, through the heart
of the county. Then, by using this well -established,
operational commuter rail system as a platform for
future growth, existing rail stations will be developed
into regional transportation hubs that can serve as
regional transportation gateways or the centerpiece
of local transportation services. A series of new, well -
coordinated, flexible transportation systems, each
one customized to the unique transportation vision
the station serves, will be developed. Creativity
and good financial sense will be encouraged.
Partnerships will be promoted. Transportation
solutions for each transportation hub can range
from monorails to local mini -bus systems to new
technologies. Fresh thinking will be rewarded.
The new, localized transit programs will bring
competition to local transportation planning,
creating a marketplace of transportation ideas where
the best ideas emerge and compete for funding. The
plan is to encourage civic entrepreneurship and
stimulate private involvement and investment.
Transit Investment Criteria
The guiding principles for all transit investments
are value, safety, convenience and reliability. Each
local transit vision will be evaluated against clear
criteria, such as congestion relief, cost-effectiveness,
readiness, connectivity, and a sound operating plan.
In terms of bus services, more specialized transit
services, including improved van services and
reduced fares for senior citizens and people with
disabilities, will be provided. Safety at key bus stops
will be improved. And a network of community -
based, mini -bus services will be developed in
areas outside of the central county rail corridor.
�M1
xB -157- Item 11. - 50
Orange County Transit Projects
Buena Pork Station
Fullerton Station
�ti7H11ittJlilniti it t+tinl{l�tnitllntHllti
Anaheim Canyon Station
Anaheim Station
Orange Station
Santa Ana Depot
Rancho
'� Santa
Irvine Transportation tJiarga rtta
Center ....�
Laguna Niguel
Mission Vieio Stabon
San 7uan Capistrano
Station
San Clemente Station
a . " ,e
„a
High Frequency Metrolink Service (moan existing rail line/stations) page 23
�S Transit Extensions to Metrolink page 23
T Metrolink Gateways (not mapped) page 24
Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities (countywide; not mapped) page 24
(-v Community Based Transit/Circulators (countywide; not mapped) page 25
t" J Safe Transit Stops (countywide; not mapped) page 25
215
C
Project 0
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Description:
This project will increase rail services within the
county and provide frequent Metrolink service north
of Fullerton to Los Angeles. The project will provide
for track improvements, more trains, and other
related needs to accommodate the expanded service.
This project is designed to build on the successes
of Metrolink and complement service expansion
made possible by the current Measure M. The
service will include upgraded stations and
added parking capacity; safety improvements
and quiet zones along the tracks; and frequent
shuttle service and other means, to move
arriving passengers to nearby destinations.
The project also includes funding for
improving grade crossings and constructing
over or underpasses at high volume arterial
streets that cross the Metrolink tracks.
Cost:
The estimated cost of capital and
operations is $1,129.8 million.
Project 0
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Description:
Frequent service in the Metrolink corridor provides
a high capacity transit system linking communities
within the central core of Orange County. This
project will establish a competitive program for local
jurisdictions to broaden the reach of the rail system
to other activity centers and communities. Proposals
for extensions must be developed and supported
by local jurisdictions and will be evaluated against
well-defined and well-known criteria as follows:
• Traffic congestion relief
• Project readiness, with priority given
to projects that can be implemented
within the first five years of the Plan
• Local funding commitments and
the availability of right-of-way
• Proven ability to attract other financial
partners, both public and private
• Cost-effectiveness
• Proximity to jobs and population centers
• Regional as well as local benefits
• Ease and simplicity of connections
• Compatible, approved land uses
• Safe and modern technology
• A sound, long-term operating plan
This project shall not be used to fund transit
routes that are not directly connected to or that
would be redundant to the core rail service on
the Metrolink corridor. The emphasis shall be
on expanding access to the core rail system and
on establishing connections to communities and
major activity centers that are not immediately
adjacent to the Metrolink corridor. It is intended
that multiple transit projects be funded through
" -)ject R cost estimate amended on Decen
Hs -1 s9- Item 11. - 52
24
a competitive process and no single project may
be awarded all of the funds under this program.
These connections may include a variety of
transit technologies such as conventional bus,
bus rapid transit or high capacity rail transit
systems as long as they can be fully integrated
and provide seamless transition for the users.
Cost:
The estimated cost to implement this program
over thirty years is $1,000.0 million.
Project
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional
Gateways that Connect Orange County
with High -Speed Rail Systems
Description:
This program will provide the local improvements
that are necessary to connect planned
future high-speed rail systems to stations
on the Orange County Metrolink route.
The State of California is currently planning a
high-speed rail system linking northern and
southern California. One line is planned to
terminate in Orange County. In addition, several
magnetic levitation (MAGLEV) systems that
would connect Orange County to Los Angeles
and San Bernardino Counties, including a link
from Anaheim to Ontario airport, are also being
planned or proposed by other agencies.
Cost:
The estimated Measure M share of the cost for these
regional centers and connections is $57.9 million.
Project 0
Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors
and Persons with Disabilities
Description:
This project will provide services and programs
to meet the growing transportation needs of
seniors and persons with disabilities as follows:
One and forty-seven hundredths percent
(1.47%) of net revenues will stabilize
fares and provide fare discounts for
bus services, specialized ACCESS
services and future rail services
One percent of net revenues will be
available to continue and expand local
community van service for seniors through
the existing Senior Mobility Program
One percent will supplement existing
countywide senior non -emergency
medical transportation services
Over the next 30 years, the population age 65
and over is projected to increase by 93 percent.
Demand for transit and specialized transportation
services for seniors and persons with disabilities
is expected to increase proportionately.
Cost:
The estimated cost to provide these programs
over 30 years is $392.8 million.
Item 11. - 53
and U cost estimates amended on December 14, 2015.
FIB -160-
25
ProjectAM
Community Based Transit/Circulators
Description:
This project will establish a competitive program
for local jurisdictions to develop local bus transit
services such as community based circulators,
shuttles and bus trolleys that complement regional
bus and rail services, and meet needs in areas not
adequately served by regional transit. Projects will
need to meet performance criteria for ridership,
connection to bus and rail services, and financial
viability to be considered for funding. All projects
must be competitively bid, and they cannot
duplicate or compete with existing transit services.
Cost:
The estimated cost of this project is $226.5 million.
Project 4
Safe Transit Stops
Description:
This project provides for passenger amenities at
100 busiest transit stops across the County. The
stops will be designed to ease transfer between
bus lines and provide passenger amenities
such as improved shelters, lighting, current
information on bus and train timetables and arrival
times, and transit ticket vending machines.
Cost:
The estimated cost of this project is $25.0 million.
HB -161-
Item 11. - 54
T4
a
S __
Every day, more than 70 million gallons of oily
The environmental cleanup program is designed to
pollution, litter, and dirty contamination washes
supplement, not supplant, existing transportation -
off streets, roads and freeways and pours onto
related water quality programs. This clean-up
Orange County waterways and beaches. When
program must improve, and not replace, existing
it rains, the transportation -generated pollution
pollution reduction efforts by cities, the county,
increases tenfold, contributing to the increasing
and special districts. Funds will be awarded
number of beach closures and environmental
to the highest priority programs that improve
hazards along the Orange County coast.
water quality, keep our beaches and streets clean,
and reduce transportation -generated pollution
Prior to allocation of funds for freeway, street and
along Orange County's scenic coastline.
transit projects, two percent of gross revenues
from the Renewed Measure M Transportation
Investment Plan is set aside to protect Orange
County beaches from transportation -generated
pollution (sometimes called "urban runoff')
and improving ocean water quality.
Countywide Competitive Program
Measure M Environmental Cleanup funds will
be used on a countywide, competitive basis
to meet federal Clean Water Act standards for
controlling transportation -generated pollution by
funding nationally recognized Best Management
Practices, such as catch basins with state-of-
the-art biofiltration systems; or special roadside
landscaping systems called bioswales that filter
oil runoff from streets, roads and freeways.
Item 11. - 55 HB -162-
27
Project 0
Environmental Cleanup
Description:
Implement street and highway related water
quality improvement programs and projects that
will assist Orange County cities, the County
of Orange and special districts to meet federal
Clean Water Act standards for urban runoff.
The Environmental Cleanup monies may be used for
water quality improvements related to both existing
and new transportation infrastructure, including
capital and operations improvements such as:
• Catch basin screens, filters and inserts
• Roadside bioswales and biofiltration channels
• Wetlands protection and restoration
• Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) units
• Maintenance of catch basins and bioswales
• Other street -related "Best Management Practices"
for capturing and treating urban runoff
This program is intended to augment, not replace
existing transportation related water quality
expenditures and to emphasize high -impact
capital improvements over local operations and
maintenance costs. In addition, all new freeway,
street and transit capital projects will include water
quality mitigation as part of project scope and cost.
The Environmental Cleanup program is
subject to the following requirements:
• Development of a comprehensive countywide
capital improvement program for transportation
related water quality improvements
• A competitive grant process to award funds to
the highest priority, most cost-effective projects
• A matching requirement to leverage
other federal, state and local funds
for water quality improvements
• A maintenance of effort requirement to
ensure that funds augment, not replace
existing water quality programs
• Annual reporting on actual expenditures and an
assessment of the water quality benefits provided
• A strict limit on administrative costs
and a requirement to spend funds
within three years of receipt
• Penalties for misuse of any of the
Environmental Cleanup funds
Cost:
The estimated cost for the Environmental Cleanup
program is $237.2 million. In addition it is
estimated that new freeway, road and transit projects
funded by the Renewed Measure M Transportation
Investment Plan will include more than $165
million for mitigating water quality impacts.
L-A
HB -163-
Item 11. - 56
28
When new transportation dollars are approved,
they should go for transportation and transportation
alone. No bait -and -switch. No using transportation
dollars for other purposes. The original
Measure M went solely for transportation. The
Renewed Measure M will be just as airtight.
And there will be no hidden costs in the program.
Prior to allocation of funds for freeway, street and
transit projects, one percent of gross revenues from
the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plans is set aside for audits, safeguards, and taxpayer
protection. By state law, one and one half percent of
the gross sales taxes generated by Measure M must be
paid to the California State Board of Equalization for
collecting the countywide one-half percent sales tax
that funds the Transportation Investment Program.
Special Trust Fund
To guarantee transportation dollars are used for
transportation purposes, all funds must be kept in
a special trust fund. An independent, outside audit
of this fund will protect against cheaters who try to
use the transportation funds for purposes other than
specified transportation uses. A severe punishment
will disqualify any agency that cheats from
receiving Measure M funds for a five-year period.
The annual audits, and annual reports detailing
project progress, will be sent to Orange County
taxpayers every year and will be reviewed in
public session by a special Taxpayer Oversight
Committee that can raise fiscal issues, ask
tough questions, and must independently
certify, on an annual basis, that transportation
dollars have been spent strictly according to
the Renewed Measure M Investment Plan.
Back to the Voters
Of course, over the next 30 years, things will change.
Minor adjustments can be made by a 2/3 vote of the
Taxpayer Oversight Committee and a 2/3 vote of
the Orange County Local Transportation Authority
Board of Directors. Major changes must be taken
back to voters for authorization. And, every ten
years, and more frequently if necessary, the Orange
County Local Transportation Authority must
conduct a thorough examination of the Renewed
Measure M Investment Plan and determine if
major changes should be submitted to the voters.
There are other important taxpayer safeguards,
all designed to insure the integrity of the voter -
authorized plans. But each is focused on one
goal: guaranteeing that new transportation
dollars are devoted to solving Orange County's
traffic problems and that no transportation
dollars are diverted to anything else.
Item 11. - 57 HB -164-
KT
iaxpayer
wee .
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
Fund Accounting
• All tax revenues and interest earned must be
Description:
deposited and maintained in a separate trust
Implement and maintain strict taxpayer
fund. Local jurisdictions that receive allocations
safeguards to ensure that the Renewed Measure
must also maintain them in a separate fund.
M Transportation Investment Plan is delivered
• All entities receiving tax funds must
as promised. Restrict administrative costs to
report annually on expenditures and
one percent (1%) of total tax revenues and state
progress in implementing projects
collection of the tax as prescribed in state law
• At any time, at its discretion, the Taxpayer
[currently one -and -one-half (1.5%) percent].
Oversight Committee may conduct independent
reviews or audits of the spending of tax funds
Administration of the Transportation Investment
• The elected Auditor/Controller of Orange
Plan and all spending is subject to the following
County must annually certify that spending
specific safeguards and requirements:
is in accordance with the Plan
Oversight
Spending Requirements
• All spending is subject to an
• Local jurisdictions receiving funds must
annual independent audit
abide by specific eligibility and spending
• Spending decisions must be annually
requirements detailed in the Streets & Roads and
reviewed and certified by an independent
Environmental Cleanup components of the Plan
Taxpayer Oversight Committee
• Funds must be used only for transportation
• An annual report on spending and
purposes described in the Plan. The penalty
progress in implementing the Plan
for misspending is full repayment and loss of
must be submitted to taxpayers
funding eligibility for a period of five years.
• No funds may be used to replace
Integrity of the Plan
private developer funding committed
• No changes to the Plan can be made
to any project or improvement
without review and approval by 2/3 vote
• Funds shall augment, not replace existing funds
of the Taxpayer Oversight Committee
• Every effort shall be made to maximize matching
• Major changes to the Plan such as deleting
state and federal transportation dollars
a project or shifting projects among major
spending categories (Freeways, Streets &
Roads, Transit, Environmental Cleanup)
must be ratified by a majority of voters
• The Plan must be subject at least every ten
years to public review and assessment of
progress in delivery, public support and
changed circumstances. Any significant
proposed changes to the Plan must be approved
by the Taxpayer Oversight Committee
and ratified by a majority of voters.
i
i
HB -165- Item 11. - 58
_30
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
�.11
Taxpayer Oversight Committee
• The committee shall consist of eleven
members —two members from each of the five
Board of Supervisor's districts, who shall not be
elected or appointed officials —along with the
elected Auditor/Controller of Orange County
• Members shall be recruited and screened for
expertise and experience by the Orange County
Grand Jurors Association. Members shall be
selected from the qualified pool by lottery.
• The committee shall be provided with
sufficient resources to conduct independent
reviews and audits of spending and
implementation of the Plan
Collecting the Tax
• The State Board of Equalization shall be paid
one -and -one-half (1.5) percent of gross revenues
each fiscal year for its services in collecting
sales tax revenue as prescribed in Section 7273
of the State's Revenue and Taxation Code
Cost:
The estimated cost for Safeguards and Audits
over thirty years is $296.6 million.
ACV
Item 11. - 59 HB -166-
31
LOC4TION
PROIEV
eeway
Projects
I-5
Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements
1-5
Santa Ana/San Diego Freeway Improvements
'
SR-22
Garden Grove Freeway Access Improvements
SR-55
Costa Mesa Freeway Improvements
SR-57
Orange Freeway Improvements
SR-91
Riverside Freeway Improvements
Goo
I-405
San Diego Freeway Improvements
08
I-605
Freeway Access Improvements
All
Freeway Service Patrol
Regional Capacity Program ia
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program
Local Fair Share Program e
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Metrolink Gateways
Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
AOL
Community Based Transit/Circulators
Safe Transit Stops
Clean Up Highway and Street Runoff that Pollutes Beaches
Collect Sales Taxes (State charges required by law)
Oversight and Annual Audits
$470.0
1,185.2
120.0
366.0
258.7
908.7*
1,392.5*
20.0
150.0
$1,132.8
453.1
2,039.1
$1,129.8*
1,000.0
57.9*
392.8*
226.5
25.0
$237.2
$178.0
118.6
*Asterisk nntPc project estimates that have been amend
HB -167- Item 11. - 60
1
2'
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTACHMENT B
ALLOCATION OF NET REVENUES
I. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of the Ordinance the following words shall mean as stated.
A. "Capital Improvement Program": a multi -year -year funding plan to
implement capital transportation projects and/or programs, including but not limited to
capacity, safety, operations, maintenance, and rehabilitation projects.
B. "Circulation Element": an element of an Eligible Jurisdiction's General
Plan depicting planned roadways and related policies, including consistency with the
MPAH.
C. "Congestion Management Program": a program established in 1990
(California Government Code 65089), for effective use of transportation funds to alleviate
traffic congestion and related impacts through a balanced transportation and land use
planning process.
D. "Eligible Jurisdiction": a city in Orange County or the County of
Orange, which satisfies the requirements of Section III A.
E. "Encumbrance". the execution of a contract or other action to be
funded by Net Revenues.
F. "Environmental Cleanup": street, highway, freeway and transit related
water quality improvement programs and projects as described in the Plan.
G. "Environmental Cleanup Revenues": Two percent (2%) of the
Revenues allocated annually plus interest and other earnings on the allocated revenues,
which shall be maintained in a separate account.
H. "Expenditure Report": a detailed financial report to account for receipt,
interest earned and use of Measure M and other funds consistent with requirements of the
Ordinance.
I. "Freeway Protect": the planning, design, construction, improvement,
11 914007.11
Item 11. - 61
11
B-1
HB -168-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
operation or maintenance necessary for, incidental to, or convenient for a state or interstate
freeway.
J "Local Fair Share Program": a formula -based allocation to Eligible
Jurisdictions for Street and Road Projects as described in the Plan.
K. "Local Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan": identification of traffic
signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals within a jurisdiction.
L. "Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH)": a countywide
transportation plan administered by the Authority defining the ultimate number of through
lanes for arterial streets, and designating the traffic signal synchronization street routes in
Orange County.
M. "Net Revenues": The remaining Revenues after the deduction for: (i)
amounts payable to the State Board of Equalization for the performance of functions
incidental to the administration and operation of the Ordinance, (ii) costs for the
administration of the Ordinance, (iii) two percent (2%) of the Revenues annually allocated
for Environmental Cleanup, and (iv) satisfaction of debt service requirements of all bonds
issued pursuant to the Ordinance that are not satisfied out of separate allocations.
N. "Pavement Management Plan": a plan to manage the preservation,
rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles,
assessing overall system performance and costs, and determining alternative strategies
and costs necessary to improve paved roads.
O. "Permit Streamlining": commitments by state and federal agencies to
reduce project delays associated with permitting of freeway projects through development
of a comprehensive conservation strategy early in the planning process and the permitting
of multiple projects with a single comprehensive conservation strategy.
P. "Programmatic Mitigation": permanent protection of areas of high
ecological value, and associated restoration, management and monitoring, to
comprehensively compensate for numerous, smaller impacts associated with individual
transportation projects. Continued function of existing mitigation features, such as wildlife
214007.11
B-2
HB -169-
Item 11. - 62
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
passages, is not included.
Q. "Project Final Report": certification of completion of a project funded
with Net Revenues, description of work performed, and accounting of Net Revenues
expended and interest earned on Net Revenues allocated for the project.
R. "Regional Capacity Program": capital improvement projects to
increase roadway capacity and improve roadway operation as described in the Plan.
S. "Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program": competitive capital
and operations funding for the coordination of traffic signals across jurisdictional boundaries
as included in the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan and as described in the Plan.
T. "Revenues": All gross revenues generated from the transactions and
use tax of one-half of one percent (1/2%) plus any interest or other earnings thereon.
U. "State Board of Equalization": agency of the State of California
responsible for the administration of sales and use taxes.
V. "Street and Road Project": the planning, design, construction,
improvement, operation or maintenance necessary for, incidental to, or convenient for a
street or road, or for any transportation purpose, including, but not limited to, purposes
authorized by Article XIX of the California Constitution.
W. "Traffic Forums": a group of Eligible Jurisdictions working together to
facilitate the planning of traffic signal synchronization among the respective jurisdictions.
X. "Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan": an element of the
MPAH to promote smooth traffic flow through synchronization of traffic signals along
designated street routes in the County.
Y. "Transit": the transportation of passengers by bus, rail, fixed guideway
or other vehicle.
Z. "Transit Project": the planning, design, construction, improvement,
equipment, operation or maintenance necessary for, or incidental to, or convenient for
transit facilities or transit services.
AA. "Watershed Management Areas": areas to be established by the
11214007.11
Item 11. - 63
11
M9
HB -170-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
County of Orange, in cooperation with local jurisdictions, or by another public entity with
appropriate legal authority, for the management of water run-off related to existing or new
transportation projects.
Il. REQUIREMENTS.
The Authority may allocate Net Revenues to the State of California, an Eligible
Jurisdiction, or the Authority for any project, program or purpose as authorized by the
Ordinance, and the allocation of Net Revenues by the Authority shall be subject to the
following requirements:
A. Freeway Projects
1. The Authority shall make every effort to maximize state and
federal funding for Freeway Projects. No Net Revenues shall be allocated in any year to
any Freeway Project if the Authority has made findings at a public meeting that the state or
the federal government has reduced any allocations of state funds or federal funds to the
Authority as the result of the addition of any Net Revenues.
2. All Freeway Projects funded with Net Revenues, including
project development and overall project management, shall be a joint responsibility of
Caltrans, the Authority, and the affected jurisdiction(s). All major approval actions,
including the project concept, the project location, and any subsequent change in project
scope shall be jointly agreed upon by Caltrans, the Authority, and the project sponsors, and
where appropriate, by the Federal Highway Administration and/or the California
Transportation Commission.
3. Prior to the allocation of Net Revenues for a Freeway Project,
the Authority shall obtain written assurances from the appropriate state agency that after
the Freeway Project is constructed to at least minimum acceptable state standards, the
state shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of such Freeway Project.
4. Freeway Projects will be built largely within existing rights of
way using the latest highway design and safety requirements. However, to the greatest
extent possible within the available budget, Freeway Projects shall be implemented using
214007.11
B-4
HB -171-
Item 11. - 64
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Context Sensitive Design, as described in the nationally recognized Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) Principles of Context Sensitive Design Standards. Freeway
Projects will be planned, designed and constructed using a flexible community -responsive
and collaborative approach to balance aesthetic, historic and environmental values with
transportation safety, mobility, maintenance and performance goals. Context Sensitive
Design features include: parkway -style designs; environmentally friendly, locally native
landscaping; sound reduction; improved wildlife passage and aesthetic treatments, designs
and themes that are in harmony with the surrounding communities.
5. At least five percent (5%) of the Net Revenues allocated for
Freeway Projects shall fund Programmatic Mitigation for Freeway Projects. These funds
shall be derived by pooling funds from the mitigation budgets of individual Freeway
Projects, and shall only be allocated subject to the following:
a. Development of a Master Environmental Mitigation and
Resource Protection Plan and Agreement (Master Agreement) between the Authority and
state and federal resource agencies that includes:
(i) commitments by the Authority to provide for
programmatic environmental mitigation of the Freeway Projects,
(ii) commitments by state and federal resource
agencies to reduce project delays associated with permitting and streamline the permit
process for Freeway Projects,
(iii) an accounting process for mitigation obligations
and credits that will document net environmental benefit from regional, programmatic
mitigation in exchange for net benefit in the delivery of transportation improvements
through streamlined and timely approvals and permitting, and
(iv) a description of the specific mitigation actions and
expenditures to be undertaken and a phasing, implementation and maintenance plan.
(v) appointment by the Authority of a Mitigation and
Resource Protection Program Oversight Committee ("Environmental Oversight
11 914007.11
Item 11. - 65
11
B-5
HB -172-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Committee") to make recommendations to the Authority on the allocation of the Net
Revenues for programmatic mitigation, and to monitor implementation of the Master
Agreement. The Environmental Oversight Committee shall consist of no more than twelve
members and be comprised of representatives of the Authority, Caltrans, state and federal
resource agencies, non -governmental environmental organizations, the public and the
Taxpayers Oversight Committee.
b. A Master Agreement shall be developed as soon as
practicable following the approval of the ballot proposition by the electors. It is the intent of
the Authority and state and federal resource agencies to develop a Master Agreement prior
to the implementation of Freeway Projects.
C. Expenditures of Net Revenues made subject to a Master
Agreement shall be considered a Freeway Project and may be funded from the proceeds of
bonds issued subject to Section 5 of the Ordinance.
B. Transit Proiects
1. The Authority shall make every effort to maximize state and
federal funding for Transit Projects. No Net Revenues shall be allocated in any year for
any Transit Project if the Authority has made findings at a public meeting that the state or
the federal government has reduced any allocations of state funds or federal funds to the
Authority as the result of the addition of any Revenues.
2. Prior to the allocation of Net Revenues for a Transit Project, the
Authority shall obtain a written agreement from the appropriate jurisdiction that the Transit
Project will be constructed, operated and maintained to minimum standards acceptable to
the Authority.
C. Street and Road Projects
Prior to the allocation of Net Revenues for any Street and Road
Project, the Authority, in cooperation with affected agencies, shall determine the entity(ies)
to be responsible for the maintenance and operation thereof.
214007.11
Me
Item 11. - 66
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
III. REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE JURISDICTIONS.
A In order to be eligible to receive Net Revenues, a jurisdiction shall
satisfy and continue to satisfy the following requirements.
1. Congestion Management Program. Comply with the conditions
and requirements of the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP)
pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65089.
2. Mitigation Fee Program. Assess traffic impacts of new
development and require new development to pay a fair share of necessary transportation
improvements attributable to the new development.
3. Circulation Element. Adopt and maintain a Circulation Element
of the jurisdiction's General Plan consistent with the MPAH.
4. Capital Improvement Program. Adopt and update biennially a
six -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP shall include all capital
transportation projects, including projects funded by Net Revenues, and shall include
transportation projects required to demonstrate compliance with signal synchronization and
pavement management requirements.
5. Traffic Forums.
Participate in Traffic Forums to facilitate the planning of traffic
signal synchronization programs and projects. Eligible Jurisdictions and Caltrans, in
participation with the County of Orange and the Orange County Division of League of
Cities, will establish the boundaries for Traffic Forums. The following will be considered
when establishing boundaries:
a. Regional traffic routes and traffic patterns;
b. Inter -jurisdictional coordination efforts; and
C. Total number of Traffic Forums.
6. Local Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan. Adopt and maintain a
Local Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan which shall identify traffic signal synchronization
street routes and traffic signals; include a three-year plan showing costs, available funding
11 214007.11
Item 11. - 67
WA
HB -174-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and phasing of capital, operations and maintenance of the street routes and traffic signals;
and include information on how the street routes and traffic signals may be synchronized
with traffic signals on the street routes in adjoining jurisdictions. The Local Traffic Signal
Synchronization Plan shall be consistent with the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master
Plan.
7. Pavement Management Plan. Adopt and update biennially a
Pavement Management Plan, and issue, using a common format approved by the
Authority, a report every two years regarding the status of road pavement conditions and
implementation of the Pavement Management Plan.
a. Authority, in consultation with the Eligible Jurisdictions,
shall define a countywide management method to inventory, analyze and evaluate road
pavement conditions, and a common method to measure improvement of road pavement
conditions.
b. The Pavement Management Plan shall be based on. -
either the Authority's countywide pavement management method or a comparable
management method approved by the Authority, and the Authority's method to measure
improvement of road pavement conditions.
C. The Pavement Management Plan shall include:
(i) Current status of pavement on roads;
(ii) A six -year plan for road maintenance and
rehabilitation, including projects and funding;
(iii) The projected road pavement conditions resulting
from the maintenance and rehabilitation plan; and
(iv) Alternative strategies and costs necessary to
improve road pavement conditions.
8. Expenditure Report. Adopt an annual Expenditure Report to
account for Net Revenues, developer/traffic impact fees, and funds expended by the
Eligible Jurisdiction which satisfy the Maintenance of Effort requirements. The Expenditure
214007.11
HB -175-
Item 11. - 68
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Report shall be submitted by the end of six (6) months following the end of the jurisdiction's
fiscal year and include the following:
a. All Net Revenue fund balances and interest earned.
b. Expenditures identified by type (i.e., capital, operations,
administration, etc.), and program or project .
9. Project Final Report. Provide Authority with a Project Final
Report within six months following completion of a project funded with Net Revenues.
10. Time Limits for Use of Net Revenues.
a. Agree that Net Revenues for Regional Capacity Program
projects and Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program projects shall be expended
or encumbered no later than the end of the fiscal year for which the Net Revenues are
programmed. A request for extension of the encumbrance deadline for no more than
twenty-four months may be submitted to the Authority no less than ninety days prior to the
deadline. The Authority may approve one or more requests for extension of the
encumbrance deadline.
b. Agree that Net Revenues allocated for any program or
project, other than a Regional Capacity Program project or a Regional Traffic Signal
Synchronization Program project, shall be expended or encumbered within three years of
receipt. The Authority may grant an extension to the three-year limit, but extensions shall
not be granted beyond a total of five years from the date of the initial funding allocation.
C. In the event the time limits for use of Net Revenues are
not satisfied then any retained Net Revenues that were allocated to an Eligible Jurisdiction
and interest earned thereon shall be returned to the Authority and these Net Revenues and
interest earned thereon shall be available for allocation to any project within the same
source program.
11. Maintenance of Effort. Annual certification that the Maintenance
of Effort requirements of Section 6 of the Ordinance have been satisfied.
12. No Supplanting of Funds. Agree that Net Revenues shall not be
11 214007.11
Item 11. - 69
11
M
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
used to supplant developer funding which has been or will be committed for any
transportation project.
13. Consider, as part of the Eligible Jurisdiction's General Plan, land
use planning strategies that accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation.
B. Determination of Non -Eligibility
A determination of non -eligibility of a jurisdiction shall be made only
after a hearing has been conducted and a determination has been made by the Authority's
Board of Directors that the jurisdiction is not an Eligible Jurisdiction as provided
hereinabove.
IV. ALLOCATION OF NET REVENUES; GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Subject to the provisions of the Ordinance, including Section II above,
use of the Revenues shall be as follows:
1. First, the Authority shall pay the State Board of Equalization for
the services and functions;
2. Second, the Authority shall pay the administration expenses of
the Authority;
3. Third, the Authority shall satisfy the annual allocation
requirement of two percent (2%) of Revenues for Environmental Cleanup; and
4. Fourth, the Authority shall satisfy the debt service requirements
of all bonds issued pursuant to the Ordinance that are not satisfied out of separate
allocations.
B. After providing for the use of Revenues described in Section A above,
and subject to the averaging provisions of Section D below, the Authority shall allocate the
Net Revenues as follows:
1. Forty-three percent (43%) for Freeway Projects;
2. Thirty-two percent (32%) for Street and Road Projects; and
3. Twenty-five percent (25%) for Transit Projects.
C. The allocation of thirty-two percent (32%) of the Net Revenues for
214007.11
B-10
HB -177-
Item 11. - 70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Street and Road Projects pursuant to Section B 2 above shall be made as follows:
1. Ten percent (10%) of the Net Revenues shall be allocated for
Regional Capacity Program projects;
2. Four percent (4%) of the Net Revenues shall be allocated for
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program projects; and
3. Eighteen percent (18%) of the Net Revenues shall be allocated
for Local Fair Share Program projects.
D. In any given year, except for the allocations for Local Fair Share
Program projects, the Authority may allocate Net Revenues on a different percentage basis
than required by Sections B and C above in order to meet short-term needs and to
maximize efforts to capture state, federal, or private transportation dollars, provided the
percentage allocations set forth in Sections B and C above shall be achieved during the
duration of the Ordinance.
E. The Authority shall allocate Net Revenues for programs and projects
as necessary to meet contractual, program or project obligations, and the Authority may
withhold allocations until needed to meet contractual, program or project obligations, except
that Net Revenues allocated for the Local Fair Share Program pursuant to Section C above
shall be paid to Eligible Jurisdictions within sixty days of receipt by the Authority.
F. The Authority may exchange Net Revenues from a Plan funding
category for federal, state or other local funds allocated to any public agency within or
outside the area of jurisdiction to maximize the effectiveness of the Plan. The Authority and
the exchanging public agency must use the exchanged funds for the same program or
project authorized for the use of the funds prior to the exchange. Such federal, state or
local funds received by the Authority shall be allocated by the Authority to the same Plan
funding category that was the source of the exchanged Net Revenues, provided, however,
in no event shall an exchange reduce the Net Revenues allocated for Programmatic
Mitigation of Freeway Projects.
G. If additional funds become available for a specific project or program
11 214007.11
Item 11. - 71
11
B-11
HB -178-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
described in the Plan, the Authority may allocate the Net Revenues replaced by the receipt
of those additional funds, in the following order of priority: first, to Plan projects and
programs which provide congestion relief in the geographic region which received the
additional funds; second, to other projects and programs within the affected geographic
region which may be placed in the Plan through an amendment to the Ordinance; and third,
to all other Plan projects and programs.
H. Upon review and acceptance of the Project Final Report, the Authority
shall allocate the balance of Net Revenues for the project, less the interest earned on the
Net Revenues allocated for the project.
V. ALLOCATION OF NET REVENUES: STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAMS/
PROJECTS
A. Regional Capacity Program.
1. Matching Funds. An Eligible Jurisdiction shall contribute local
matching funds equal to fifty percent (50%) of the project or program cost. This local match
requirement may be reduced as follows:
a. A local match reduction of ten percent (10%) of the
eligible cost if the Eligible Jurisdiction implements, maintains and operates in conformance
with the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
b. A local match reduction of ten percent (10%) of the
eligible cost if the Eligible Jurisdiction either:
(i) has measurable improvement of paved road
conditions during the previous reporting period as determined pursuant to the Authority's
method of measuring improvement of road pavement conditions, or
(ii) has road pavement conditions during the previous
reporting period which are within the highest twenty percent of the scale for road pavement
conditions as determined pursuant to the Authority's method of measuring improvement of
road pavement conditions.
c. A local match reduction of five percent (5%) of the
21400711
B-12
HB -179-
Item 11. - 72
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
eligible cost if the Eligible Jurisdiction does not use any Net Revenues as part of the funds
I for the local match.
2. Allocations shall be determined pursuant to a countywide
competitive procedure adopted by the Authority. Eligible Jurisdictions shall be consulted by
the Authority in establishing criteria for determining priority for allocations.
B. Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program.
1. Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
The Authority shall adopt and maintain a Traffic Signal
Synchronization Master Plan, which shall be a part of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways.
The Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan shall include traffic signal synchronization
street routes and traffic signals within and across jurisdictional boundaries, and the means
of implementing, operating and maintaining the programs and projects, including necessary
governance and legal arrangements.
2. Allocations.
a. Allocations shall be determined pursuant to a countywide
competitive procedure adopted by the Authority. Eligible Jurisdictions shall be consulted by
the Authority in establishing criteria for determining priority for allocations.
b. The Authority shall give priority to programs and projects
which include two or more jurisdictions.
C. The Authority shall encourage the State to participate in
the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and Authority shall give priority to use
of transportation funds as match for the State's discretionary funds used for implementing
the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program.
3. An Eligible Jurisdiction shall contribute matching local funds
equal to twenty percent (20%) of the project or program cost. The requirement for
matching local funds may be satisfied all or in part with in -kind services provided by the
Eligible Jurisdiction for the program or project, including salaries and benefits for
employees of the Eligible Jurisdiction who perform work on the project or programs.
11 214007.11
Item 11. - 73
11
B-13
HB -180-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. An Eligible Jurisdiction shall issue a report once every three
years regarding the status and performance of its traffic signal synchronization activities.
5. Not less than once every three years an Eligible Jurisdiction
shall review and revise, as may be necessary, the timing of traffic signals included as part
of the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
6. An Eligible Jurisdiction withdrawing from a signal
synchronization project shall be required to return Net Revenues allocated for the project.
C. Local Fair Share Program.
The allocation of eighteen percent (18%) of the Net Revenues for
Local Fair Share Program projects shall be made to Eligible Jurisdictions in amounts
determined as follows:
1. Fifty percent (50%) divided between Eligible Jurisdictions based
on the ratio of each Eligible Jurisdiction's population for the immediately preceding calendar
year to the total County population (including incorporated and unincorporated areas) for
the immediately preceding calendar year, both as determined by the State Department of
Finance;
2. Twenty-five percent (25%) divided between Eligible Jurisdictions
based on the ratio of each Eligible Jurisdiction's existing Master Plan of Arterial Highways
("MPAH") centerline miles to the total existing MPAH centerline miles within the County as
determined annually by the Authority; and
3. Twenty-five percent (25%) divided between Eligible Jurisdictions
based on the ratio of each Eligible Jurisdiction's total taxable sales to the total taxable sales
of the County for the immediately preceding calendar year as determined by the State
Board of Equalization.
VI. ALLOCATION OF NET REVENUES: TRANSIT PROGRAMS/PROJECTS.
A. Transit Extensions to Metrolink.
1. The Authority may provide technical assistance, transportation
planning and engineering resources for an Eligible Jurisdiction to assist in designing Transit
214007.11
B-14
HB -181-
Item 11. - 74
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Extensions to Metrolink projects to provide effective and user-friendly connections to
Metrolink services and bus transit systems.
2. To be eligible to receive Net Revenues for Transit Extension to
Metrolink projects, an Eligible Jurisdiction must execute a written agreement with the
l Authority regarding the respective roles and responsibilities pertaining to construction,
ownership, operation and maintenance of the Transit Extension to Metrolink project.
3. Allocations of Net Revenues shall be determined pursuant to a
countywide competitive procedure adopted by the Authority. This procedure shall include
an evaluation process and methodology applied equally to all candidate Transit Extension
to Metrolink projects. Eligible Jurisdictions shall be consulted by the Authority in the
development of the evaluation process and methodology.
B. Metrolink Gateways.
1. The Authority may provide technical assistance, transportation
planning and engineering resources for an Eligible Jurisdiction to assist in designing
Regional Transit Gateway facilities to provide for effective and user-friendly connections to
the Metrolink system and other transit services.
2. To be eligible to receive Net Revenues for Regional Gateway
projects, an Eligible Jurisdiction must execute a written agreement with the Authority
regarding the respective roles and responsibilities pertaining to construction, ownership,
operation and maintenance of the Regional Gateway facility.
3. Allocations of Net Revenues shall be determined pursuant to a
countywide competitive procedure adopted by the Authority. This procedure shall include
an evaluation process and methodology applied equally to all candidate Regional Gateway
projects. Eligible Jurisdictions shall be consulted by the Authority in the development of the
evaluation process and methodology.
C. Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities.
1. An Eligible Jurisdiction may contract with another entity to
perform all or part of a Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities project.
B-15
I ;114007.11
Item 11. - 75
1'
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. A senior is a person age sixty years or older.
3. Allocations.
a. One percent (1 %) of the Net Revenues shall be allocated
to the County to augment existing senior non -emergency medical transportation services
funded with Tobacco Settlement funds as of the effective date of the Ordinance. The
County shall continue to fund these services in an annual amount equal to the same
percentage of the total annual Tobacco Settlement funds received by the County. The Net
Revenues shall be annually allocated to the County in an amount no less than the Tobacco
Settlement funds annually expended by the County for these services and no greater than
one percent of net revenues plus any accrued interest.
b. One percent (1 %) of the Net Revenues shall be allocated
to continue and expand the existing Senior Mobility Program provided by the Authority.
The allocations shall be determined pursuant to criteria and requirements for the Senior
Mobility Program adopted by the Authority.
C. One and forty-seven hundredths percent (1.47%) of the
Net Revenues shall be allocated to partially fund bus and ACCESS fares for seniors and
persons with disabilities in an amount equal to the percentage of partial funding of fares for
seniors and persons with disabilities as of the effective date of the Ordinance, and to
partially fund train and other transit service fares for seniors and persons with disabilities in
amounts as determined by the Authority.
d. In the event any Net Revenues to be allocated for seniors
and persons with disabilities pursuant to the requirements of subsections a, b and c above
remain after the requirements are satisfied then the remaining Net Revenues shall be
allocated for other transit programs or projects for seniors and persons with disabilities as
determined by the Authority.
D. Community Based Transit/Circulators.
1. The Authority may provide technical assistance, transportation
planning, procurement and operations resources for an Eligible Jurisdiction to assist in
214007.11
B-16
Item 11. - 76
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
designing Community Based Transit/Circulators projects to provide effective and user-
friendly transit connections to countywide bus transit and Metrolink services.
2. To be eligible to receive Net Revenues for Community Based
Transit/Circulators projects, an Eligible Jurisdiction must execute a written agreement with
the Authority regarding the respective roles and responsibilities pertaining to construction,
ownership, operation and maintenance of the Community Based Transit/Circulators project.
3. Allocations of Net Revenues shall be determined pursuant to a
countywide competitive procedure adopted by the Authority. This procedure shall include
an evaluation process and methodology applied equally to all candidate Community Based
Transit/Circulator projects. Eligible Jurisdictions shall be consulted by the Authority in the
development of the evaluation process and methodology.
4. An Eligible Jurisdiction may contract with another entity to
perform all or part of a Community Based Transit/Circulators project.
VII. ALLOCATION OF NET REVENUES; ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
PROGRAMS/PROJECTS.
A. An Eligible Jurisdiction may contract with any other public entity to
perform all or any part of an Environmental Cleanup project.
B. Allocation Committee.
1. The Allocation Committee shall not include any elected public
officer and shall include the following twelve (12) voting members:
(i) one (1) representative of the County of Orange;
(ii) five (5) representatives of cities, subject to the
requirement for one (1) representative for the cities in each supervisorial district;
(iii) one (1) representative of the California Department of
Transportation;
entities;
(iv) two (2) representatives of water or wastewater public
(v) one (1) representative of the development industry,
11 214007.11
Item 11. - 77
11
B-17
HB -184-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(vi) one (1) representative of the scientific or academic
community;
(vii) one (1) representative of private or non-profit
organizations involved in environmental and water quality protection/enforcement matters;
In addition, one (1) representative of the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board and one (1) representative of the San Diego Regional Water Quality
Control Board shall be non -voting members of the Allocation Committee.
2. The Allocation Committee shall recommend to the Authority for
adoption by the Authority the following:
a. A competitive grant process for the allocation of
Environmental Cleanup Revenues, including the highest priority to capital improvement
projects included in a Watershed Management Area. The process shall give priority to
cost-effective projects and programs that offer opportunities to leverage other funds for
maximum benefit.
b. A process requiring that Environmental Cleanup
Revenues allocated for projects and programs shall supplement and not supplant funding
from other sources for transportation related water quality projects and programs.
C. Allocation of Environmental Cleanup Revenues for
proposed projects and programs.
d. An annual reporting procedure and a method to assess
the water quality benefits provided by completed projects and programs.
214007.11
B-18
HB -185-
Item 11. - 78
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTACHMENT C
TAXPAYER OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
I. PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION. A Taxpayer Oversight Committee
("Committee") is hereby established for the purpose of overseeing compliance with the
Ordinance as specified in Section IV hereof. The Committee shall be organized and
convened before any Revenues are collected or spent pursuant to the Ordinance.
Il. COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP. The Committee shall be governed by eleven
members ("Member"). The composition of the Committee membership shall be subject to
the following provisions.
A. Geographic Balance. The membership of the Committee shall be
geographically balanced at all times as follows:
1. There shall be two Members appointed from each of the
County's supervisorial districts (individually, "District"); and
2. The Auditor -Controller shall be a Member and chairman
("Chair") of the Committee.
B. Member Term. Each Member, except the Auditor -Controller and
as provided in Section III B 2 below, shall be appointed for a term of three years; provided,
however, that any Member appointed to replace a Member who has resigned or been
removed shall serve only the balance of such Member's unexpired term, and no person
shall serve as a Member for a period in excess of six consecutive years.
C. Resignation. Any Member may, at any time, resign from the
Committee upon written notice delivered to the Auditor -Controller. Acceptance of any
public office, the filing of an intent to seek public office, including a filing under California
Government Code Section 85200, or change of residence to outside the District shall
constitute a Member's automatic resignation.
D. Removal. Any Member who has three consecutive unexcused
absences from meetings of the Committee shall be removed as a Member. An absence
Item 11. - 79'71.8 HB -186- i
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
from a Committee meeting shall be considered unexcused unless, prior to or after such
absence (i) the Member submits to each of the other Members a written request to excuse
such absence, which request shall state the reason for such absence and any special
circumstances existing with respect to such absence; and (ii) a majority of the other
Members agree to excuse such absence.
E. Reappointment. Any former Member may be reappointed.
III. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS.
A. Membership Recommendation Panel.
1. The Authority shall contract with the Orange County Grand
Jurors' Association for the formation of a committee membership recommendation panel
("Panel") to perform the duties set forth in this subsection III A. If the Orange County Grand
Jurors' Association refuses or fails to act in such capacity, the Authority shall contract with
another independent organization selected by the Authority for the formation of the Panel.
2. The Panel shall have five members who shall screen and
recommend potential candidates for Committee membership.
3. The Panel shall solicit, collect and review applications from
potential candidates for membership on the Committee. No currently elected or appointed
officer of any public entity ("Public Officer") will be eligible to serve as a Member, except the
Auditor -Controller, and a Public Officer shall complete an Intent to Resign form, which shall
be provided as part of the application and submitted as part of the initial application
process. Failure to submit an Intent to Resign form will deem such Public Officer ineligible
for consideration to serve as a Member. In addition, a person who has a financial conflict
of interest with regard to the allocation of Revenues will be deemed ineligible for
consideration to serve as a Member. A Member shall reside within the District the Member
is appointed to represent. Subject to the foregoing restrictions, the Panel shall evaluate
each potential candidate on the basis of the following criteria:
a. Commitment and ability to participate in Committee
28 11 meetings,
r_2
�07T79.8
Item 11. - 80
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. Demonstrated interest and history of participation in
community activities, with special emphasis on transportation -related activities; and
C. Lack of conflicts of interest with respect to the allocation
I of Revenues.
4. For initial membership on the Committee, the Panel shall
recommend to the Authority at least five candidates from each of the two Districts that are
represented by one member on the Ordinance No. 2, Citizens Oversight Committee
("COC") as of the date the Authority appoints the initial Members. Thereafter, the Panel
shall recommend to the Authority at least five candidates for filing each vacancy on the
Committee.
B. Initial Members.
1. The COC members, as of the date the Authority appoints the
initial Members of the Committee, shall be appointed as initial Members of the Committee.
These Members shall each serve until each of their respective terms as a member of the
COC expires.
2. Two additional initial Members shall be appointed. The
Authority shall place the names of the candidates recommended by the Panel on equally -
sized cards which shall be deposited randomly in a container. In public session, the
Chairman of the Authority will draw a sufficient number of names from said container to
allocate Committee membership in accordance with the membership requirements and
restrictions set forth in Section II hereof. The first person whose name is drawn shall be
appointed to serve a term of three years. Thereafter, the person whose name is drawn
who is not from the same District as the first person whose name is drawn shall be
appointed to serve a term of two years.
C. Member Vacancy. A member vacancy, however caused, shall be
filled by the Authority. A Member shall be appointed on or about July 1 to replace a
Member whose term has expired. A Member may be appointed at any time as necessary
to replace a Member who has resigned or been removed. The Authority shall place the
Item 11. - 81 HB -188-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
names of the candidates recommended by the Panel for the appointment on equally -sized
cards which shall be deposited randomly in a container. In a public session, the Chairman
of the Authority will draw one name from said container for each vacancy on the
Committee. The person whose name is so drawn shall be appointed by the Authority to fill
the vacancy.
IV. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The Committee is hereby charged
with the following duties and responsibilities:
A. The initial Members shall convene to adopt such procedural rules and
regulations as are necessary to govern the conduct of Committee meetings, including, but
not limited to, those governing the calling, noticing and location of Committee meetings, as
well as Committee quorum requirements and voting procedures. The Committee may
select its own officers, including, but not limited to, a Committee co-chair who will be the
primary spokesperson for the Committee.
B. The Committee shall approve, by a vote of not less than two thirds of
all Committee members, any amendment to the Plan proposed by the Authority which
changes the funding categories, programs or projects identified on page 31 of the Plan.
C. The Committee shall receive and review the following documents
submitted by each Eligible Jurisdiction:
1. Congestion Management Program;
2. Mitigation Fee Program;
3. Expenditure Report;
4. Local Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan; and
5. Pavement Management Plan.
D. The Committee shall review yearly audits and hold an annual public
hearing to determine whether the Authority is proceeding in accordance with the Plan. The
Chair shall annually certify whether the Revenues have been spent in compliance with the
Plan. In addition, the Committee may issue reports, from time to time, on the progress of
the transportation projects described in the Plan.
5,07779.8
r'-4
HB -IS9-
Item 11. - 82
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
E. The Committee shall receive and review the performance assessment
conducted by the Authority at least once every three years to review the performance of the
Authority in carrying out the purposes of the Ordinance.
F. Except as otherwise provided by the Ordinance, the Committee may
contract, through the Authority, for independent analysis or examination of issues within the
Committee's purview or for other assistance as it determines to be necessary.
G. The Committee may submit a written request to the Authority to explain
any perceived deviations from the Plan. The Authority's Chair must respond to such
request, in writing, within sixty days after receipt of the same.
Item 11. - 83 HB -190-
Measure M2 Amendments &
Staff Reports
September 24, 2012 Measure M2 Transportation Investment Plan Amendment
November 9, 2012 Public Hearing on Amendment of the Measure M2 Freeway
Category: State Route 91 (Project J), Interstate 405 (Project K)
October 11, 2013 Proposal to Amend Orange County Local Transportation
Authority Ordinance No. 3 to Modify Taxpayer Oversight
Committee Membership Eligibility
November 25, 2013 Public Hearing to Amend Orange County Local Transportation
Authority Ordinance No. 3 to Modify Taxpayer Oversight
Committee Membership Eligibility
October 26, 2015 Proposed Amendment to the Measure M2 Transportation
Investment Plan
December 14, 2015 Public Hearing to Amend the Renewed Measure M Local
Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3 and Transportation
Investment Plan for the Transit Program
March 14, 2016 Renewed Measure M Local Transportation Authority Ordinance
No. 3 and Transportation Investment Plan Amendment Update
H s -191- Item 11. - 84