HomeMy WebLinkAbout1958-03-181
1
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
Tuesday, March 18, 1958
Commissioners Present: Stang, Davis, Presson, Liles, Schryer,
Bazil ( excused at 8:40 P.M. )
Commissioners Absent: None.
Minutes: On motion by Davis and seconded by Presson, the minutes of the
Huntington Beach Planning Commission of Tuesday, March 4th, 1958, as trans-
cribed and mailed by.the Secretary, were accepted as mailed.
1st P-ublic Hearing -Master Plan Chairman Bazil opened the session to hear a
of Streets and Highways
report and public opinion on the Master Plan
of Streets and Highways. W. L. Weybright, Planning Consultant Representative,
was called upon to present a detailed report of the plan. The Plan was out-
lined as follows:
I. General Comment
II. Basic Data for Decision.
A. Existing Land Use.
B. Existing Zoning.
C. Population Distribution,
D. Recommendations.
III. The Street and Highway Study.
A. General Consideration.
B. The Study.
1, Traffic Flow.
2. Origins and Destinations.
3. Vehicle Registrations.
4. Existing Street System.
5. Fire Routes.
6. Traffic Controls and Bus Routes.
7. Truck Routes.
8. Traffic Accidents.
9. Major Streets for Gas Tax Purposes.
10. Summer Traffic Load.
11. Orange County Arterial Highways Plan.
IV. The Street and Highway Plan.
Page 2 •
Public Hearing Chairman Bazil opened the hearing to the audience. There
Opened to Public
being no comment, the public hearing was closed. A dis-
cussion was held by the Commission.
Second Public Hearing A motion was made by Liles and seconded by Presson.
Set for April lst,1258
to set the date for the second public hearing on
Master Plan of Streets and Highways for April 1st, 1958•-
Chairman Excused Chairman Bazil was excused at 8:40 P. M. to take care of
other business. W. L. Schryer presided as Vice -Chairman.
Conditional Exception: UV 106 A continuation was held for petition
Applicant - Assembly of God Church
requesting permission to build chuch
buildings in an R-2 zoning district in vafiance to Article 933. Located at
611 - llth Street and legally described as Lot 15, Block 611, Huntington Beach
Tract.
The Secretary read a protest letter signed by Mr. and Mrs. W. M.
Roberts, and Mrs. Birdie Bunnell which was filed for record. The latest submitted
plans were circulated among the Commission.
Schryer opened the hearing to the public for comment.
Chris H. King, 617 - llth Street, protested against the church
building, stating that he was the adjacent property owner and would suffer
severe devaluation of his property if it were permitted. He argued that noise
and parking were already out of hand.
Mrs. Theo Miles, 607 - llth Street, addressed the Commission to protest
the variance. She stated that she objected to expanding a non -conforming use
which would be more suitably located in another area. She told of parking and
noise problems.
Rev. Walter Barnard, Pastor of Assembly of God Church, spoke to the
Commission on behalf of his church and told of the dire need for Churches and
Sunday Schools in this community. He stated that he was willing to provide
parking to the rear of the building and to landscape the front. Admitting that
the.present Church building was antiquated, he said that the Church intended
to eventually replace it with a new structure.
Another disinterested party spoke in rebuff to the Pastor's statement
implicating him.
Vice -Chairman Schryer closed the hearing to the audience and opened
a panel discussion by the Commission. Members of the Commission were of the
following opinions: That the submitted plans failed to indicate any positive
details about parking or the building structure. That the expansion of the non- V
Page 3
conforming use would be detrimental to all those property owners directly
surrounding the Church because there is not sufficient parking available. That
the middle of the R-2 residential block was not a desirable location for the
Church, and to allow the proposed addition would ultimately lead to a new Church
edifice in an already overcrowded area. That they were in deep sympathy with
the problems of the Church, but that the Church should be encouraged to relocate
rather than to expand.
A motion was made by Stang and seconded by Presson to
RECOHMD DENIAL
Roll Call Vote
AYES: Stang, Presson, Davis, Liles, Schryer.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Bazil.
Conditional Permit CP 103 The petition requests a permit to conduct a
Applicant: Ansco Constr. Co.:
gravel and earth excavation to be operated
within an A-1 General Agricultural District as allowed under Sect. 6.1, Art. 10.
Located the ten acres approximately east of Edwards and north of Taylor Street.
Legally described as SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 SEC 34, T-5-S, R-11-W, excepting
therefrom the south 100 feet of the east 150 feet.
The hearing was opened to the audience, there was no immediate response.
Prior to closing the hearing to the public, the Secretary read the recommendations
and Weybright was asked for comment. Weybright suggested that the Commission
require a guarantee that the excavation be refilled to the level of the adjoin-
ing farm land.
Herbert Murphy, President of petitioning Company, addressed the
Commission and stated that he had no real objections.to the proposed conditions
except that he would like freedom in choosing the inert material to be used as
fill.
On motion by Liles and seconded by Davis, the hearing was continued
until April lst, 1958, to allow more time for the City Attorney to make recommend-
ations regarding a performance bond.
Conditional Exception: AV 108 The petitioner requested a variance to permit
Applicant-- Theodore J. Stein:
encroachment of side yard requirement by
allowing a 2 feet side yard in an R-2-0 Zoning District. Located at 609 California
Street and legally described as Lot 6, and north 14 feet of Lot 5, Block 603,
Vista Del Mar Tract.
Page 4.
A report was made to the Commission explaining that the applicant had
already built the structure without a building permit and had located his block
walls 2 feet too close to the property line. He was seeking redemption of his
error by means of a variance.
Schryer opened the hearing to the audience, at which time the applicant
explained the circumstances under which he built and that it was an honest
mistake. There being no further comment from the audience, the hearing was
closed.
In a formal discussion the Vice -Chairman pointed out to the applicant
that while he may have made an honest mistake, it was not the obligation of
the recommending body to rectify it. Schryer pointed out that the case at hand
had no peculiar characteristics or conditions which set it apart from the
neighboring properties. It was the consensus of opinion that the Commission 664
recommend against the grafting of a special privilege when supporting evidence
did not warrant it. A motion was made by Stang and seconded by Davis to
RECOMMEND DENIAL
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: Stang, Davis, Schryer, Presson.
NOES: None
ABSENT. Bazil.
The motion carried.
Division of Land: DV 102 A request fas made by the petitioner to create
Applicant - Dean Russell
two lots out of Lot 4, Tract 405. The first
parcel would be legally described as the N 65 ft. of the east 113 ft. of Lot 4,
Tr. 405, which fronted on Cameron Street. The remainder of Lot 4 would consist
of the second parcel.
A motion was made by Liles and seconded by Presson to recommend approval
with the condition that the west 10 ft. of 65 ft. frontage lot be offered for
dedication to the City -of Huntington Beach for alley purposes.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: Stang, Presson, Schryer, Davis.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Bazil.
Motion was carried.
Page 5-
Division of Land: DV 103 A request was made by the petitioner to create
Applicant-- Lee A. Baughman
4 separate parcels out of lot 15 and the east
1/2 of Lot 14, Tract No. 7. The lots front on Garfield and Florida Avenues. The
smallest frontage is ?5 feet and the minimum area of the smallest parcel is
11,250 square feet.
The parcels proposed being of large size, there was little discussion.
A motion was made by Stand and -seconded by Davis to recommend approval without
conditions.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: Stang, Presson, Schryer, Davis.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Bazil.
Motion carried.
Informai Discussion: The Commission held an informal discussion with John
R. Carson. Carson had previously been cited for a variance violation by the
Building Department for moving a refrigerated railroad car. Members of the
Commission gave their own views on the proposal for a new variance. However
Carson was reminded that he would have to apply through the standard procedure
and that the proper conditions would be stipulated at the time the case won.i
formally considered.
Books Issued: The current edition of the State Conservation, Planning and
Zoning Book issued to all members of the Planning Commission. The book
contained the newly revised laws which require the mailing of notices for all
variances which require other official means of notification.
The meeting was adjourned.
tob Bazil
Chairman
Cliffo E. Tripp
Secretary