The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1960-05-03f MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING CO=ISSDN Council Chambers, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Tuesday, Hay 3rd, 1960 C01L1�ISSIONERS PRESENT: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Stang, Thompson, Chairman Bazil. COhUAISSIONERS ABSENT: Kaufman. MINUTES: On motion by Doutt and seconded by Presson, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of April 19th-, 1960, as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary were accepted as mailed. ZONE CASE NO 123-- To consider a petition for Initiated by Reso. 109 a CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: M-2-0 District TO R-2 District. The following parcels of real property included in Resolution of Intent No 109 and affected by the proposed change of zone are described herewith: Located on approximately 40 acres of four city blocks with various boundaries lying approximately between Beach Blvd., Huntington Avenue, Utica Street, and Clay Street. LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AS FOLLOWS: BLOCKS: 2105, 2106, 2205, 2206, 2305, 2306, 24059 24069 2505, 2506, 2605, 26069 2705, 27069 28059 28069 2503, 25049 2603-A, 2603-B, 26049 2704-A, 2704-B, 27039 2803, 2804, 2107, 2207, 2307, The W. 135 ft. of Block 2407, and the W. 200 ft. of Block 2507 of EAST SIDE VILLA TRACT as recorded in M.M. 4r-65. 399 Page ;r2 Minutes - H. Tuesday, T,iay B. Planning Commission 3rd, 1960 AND FURTHER INCLUDED IS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE FOLLOWING: Lots 7 thru 16, Block "A", Tract 837, Lots 7 thru 26, Block "B", Tract 837, and the W. 2 of Block "C", Tract 837. The hearing was opened to the audience. Pat Lyons, 2324 Florida Street, Huntington Beach, protested the proposed Zone Case on grounds the property should be developed industrially. Mrs. Floyd Annin, 717 west Valley View Drive, Fullerton, California, protested the rezoning pro - Dosed because she felt her land was more valuable as industrial. Aldon Finley, 600 N. Wilson Street, Fullerton, California, protested the proposed rezoning because she felt the area was blighted and should be used for industrial purposes. Mrs. Verda Orrell, 2713 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, requested that the one half lot of hers be eliminated from the border area. Otherwise favored the rezoning. Glenn Hyepock, 721 E. Utica Street, Huntington Beach, favored the proposed rezoning to help upgrade an established residential area. T,Irs. Carl Stewart, 2721 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, asked that her one half lot included in the border of the zone case area be excluded. Otherwise she favored the rezoning. Pars. Clara Copeland, 704 Huntington Avenue, Huntington Beach, wholeheartedly favored the proposed rezoning. L. R. Peterson, 912 Florida Avenue, Huntington Beach, favored the proposed rezoning to protect the established residential areas. Vernon Vallercamp, 2509 England Avenue, Huntington Beach, stated that he had built in good faith in an area which had been represented as soon to be rezoned residential. He favored the proposed residential zoning. Le-s Potts, 602 Yorktown Street, Huntington Beach, favored the proposed rezoning stating that he had built several units in the area and that the area was predominately residential. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commissioner Thompson abstained from participation in Zone Case No 123, giving the reason 2. M Page #3 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, i11ay 3rd, 1960 that he had property in the area. A history of the case was discussed during which it was pointed out that many of the residents in the area under consideration have approached the Planning Commission for aid in rezoning their area out of industrial and back to residential to protect the established residential district. It was pointed out that in September of 1959 a post card survey was sent out to property owners of record in the general area and the results of the survey indicated that a ma- jority of property owners hacl an interest in rezoning to residential zoning. In March,1960 a petition for re- zoning to R-2 Residential District was signed by 24 petitioners and submitted to the Planning Department. On the basis of the petition, the Planning Commission re- quested a public hearing to determine the sentiment of the area. A committee of the Planning Commission chose the general area upon which to hear the public hearing. A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED BY PRESSON TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE MEETING OF MAY 172 1960. THE MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST FOR SITE APPROVAL Located at the westerly SITE NO 17 - OCEAN SCHOOL DISTRICT end of McDonald Street ad- jacent to Boulevard Gardens Tract and legally described as follovis: PARCEL 1: The NVI 4 of SE 4 of NE 4 of Sec. 23, T.5.S.9 R.11.V1. PARCEL 2: The S. 2 of the SW 4 of NE 4 of NE q of Sec. 239 T.5.S., R.11.W.- The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment, the hearing was closed. 3• 401 Page ;r4 Minutes - 11. B. Planning Cor mission Tuesday, May 3rd, 1960 The Planning Director re- ported that this request was a revision of a previous site request which originally was to front on Heil Avenue. However at the request of the Planning Commission, the school district willingly relocated the site 660 ft. north and 660 ft. to the east. The request for relocation was made by the property ovmers involved: A 1,10TION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY PRESSON TO APPROVE OF OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL SITE NO 17. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Kaufman. THE MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION WESTI'�III1S`1'ER SCHOOL SITE, i:YPR OV.�L Located on 10 acres within Tentative Tract No 3789 and legally described as: Approximately the west 900 ft. of the E. 1680 ft. of the N. 600 ft. of S 2 of the NE 4 of Sec. 15, T.5.S., R.11. 71. , SBB & M. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr Curtis Bluemke, Business Agent for West- minster Elementary School District explained to the Commission that the size of the proposed tract would required a minimum of a ten gross acre site for a Kinder- garten through 8th grade elementary school to serve the tract itself. There being no further comment, the hear- ing was closed. Commissioners agreed upon the desirability for a school site with such a large tract, and that a 10 acre site was reasonable. 4. 402 Page #5 Minutes - H. B. Planking Commission Tuesday, May 3rd, 1960 1 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND.SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE OF REQUESTED SCHOOL SITE SUBJECT TO MINOR RELOCATION WITHIN THE TRACT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Kaufman. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO 104 To permit a subdivision Applicant - Doyle & Shields directional sign 50 ft. west from centerline of Golden West Avenue and 50 ft. north from centerline of Smeltzer Avenue. Property Owner: Adrian 0. Hubbell D. D. S. 15881 Goldenwest Huntington Beach, California Sign Owner: Doyle & Shields • 831 So. Manchester Anaheim, California A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY PRESSON TO GRANT USE PERMIT NO 104 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 'l.' There shall be posted a $100.00 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit #104. 2. Use Permit #104 shall expire one year from date granted. 3. The subdivision directional sign shall be removed by the applicant upon expiration of Use Permit #104, the penalty for failure to do so shall be the for- feiture of the performance bond. The City shall retain the right for entry and removal of sign upon expiration of Use Permit #104• ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Kaufman. THE MOTION CARRIED. 5. 403 Page f6 P,Iinutes - H: B. Planning Commission Tuesday, Play 3rd, 1960 USE PERMIT NO 105 To permit a subdivision Applicant - Doyle & Shields directional sign 50 ft. crest of Springdale Street and 50 ft. north of Wintersburg Avenue. Property Owner: Mrs Emil Kettler Sign Owner: Doyle & 5752 Heil Avenue Shields Huntington Beach 831 So. Manchester California Anaheim, California A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO GRANT USE PERMIT NO 105 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a S100.00 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit #105 . 2. Use Permit'#'105 shall expire one year from date granted. 3. The subdivision directional sign shall be removed by the applicant upon expiration of Use Permit #105, the penalty for failure to do so shall be the for- feiture of the performance bond. The City shall retain the righ-t for entry of removal of the sign upon expiration of Use Permit 105. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: . None. ABSENT: Kaufman. THE MOTION CARRIED. There being no further business, THE PJEETING ADJOURNED. Clifford E. Tripp Ro ert Bazil Secretary Chairman 6.