Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-09-07l MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING C0101ISSION Council Chambers, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 COI;MISSIONERS PRESENT: Presson, Letson, youtt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. COA,IhIISSIOITERS ABSENT: None. PrIIUUTES: On motion by Stang and seconded by Doutt, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of August 16th, 1960, as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary were accepted as mailed. TENTATIVE TRACT 11AP NO 3643 - REVISED Number of Lots: 94 Developer: Doyle & Shields Approx Acreage: 26.6 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-Nelson Located south of Smeltzer Avenue and west of Springdale Street, and legally described as portion of NE 4 of Section 21, T.5.S.2 x.11.W., SBB & M. The hearing was opened to the au- dience. Frank Richardson, engineering representative for the developer, addressed the Commission and explained the purpose of the proposed revisions. He stated that he.had no ob- jections to the proposed conditions. the hearing was closed. There being no further comment, A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3643 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. All drainage problems to be solved in a manner approved by the City Engineer prior to final recordation of any part thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE: Page #2 Minutes - H. B. Planning�Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 AYES: Presson, Letson; Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSNNT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT TylAP NO 3887 Number of hots: 31 Subdivider: George P,.. Holstein Approx Acreage: 7.66 Engineer: Millet, King & Assoc Located south of Heil Avenue and west of Cannery Street and legally descrihed as the N z of NE 4 of NE of Section 24, T.5.S., R.11.tiW., SBB & M. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment it was closed. It w_as noted that the final form of the tentative map was approved by the Subdivision Review Committee. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3887 YWITH CORRECTION AND CONDITIONS: 1. Subsurface water rights to be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT KAP NO 3950 Number of Lots: 10 Subdivider: Chip Development Co Approx Acreage: 2.5 Engineer: McDaniel Engr. Co. Located 330 ft. south of ClAy Street and west of Florida Avenue, and legally described as Block 2706, East Side Villa Tract. 2. Page ; 3 Minutes - H. B. Planning Comiuission 'Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment, the hearing was closed. It was noted that the Subdivision Review Committee had acted on the map and made recommendations which had been complied with prior to submittal of the tentative map in its final form. A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3y50 WITH DELETION OF NOTE #2. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT TRAP 110 3920 Number of. Lots: 107 ` Subdivider: George Holstein Approy Acreage: 21.2 Engineer: Millet, King & Assoc Located 607.5 ft. east of Beach Blvd., and adjoining Hintz Tract No 3429. The hearing was opened to the public, there being no comment, the hearing was closed. It was noted that the proposed tentative map had been re- viewed and approved by the Subdivision Review Committee. A MOTION WAS MADE BY. LETSON AND SECONDED BY THOMPSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3920 yWITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND CORRECTION: 1. Subsurface water rights to be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 2. All drainage problems to be solved in a manner approved by the City Engineer prior to final recordation of any part thereof. ROLL CALL VOTE: = AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. 3. 4 Page #4 Minutes - H. B. Planning -Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #217 To allow medical -professional building CONTINUED Applicant - including laboratory and pharmacy William Campbell in the R-4 District. Located south of Main Street and west of Delaware Avenue, and legally described as Lot 3, Block "F", Tract 7. The hearing was opened to the audience there being no comment the hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed. A MOTION•WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV•#217 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. All parking spaces as indicated on the submitted plans shall conform to the requirements of R-5 Zoning District which requires 10 ft. x 20 ft. parking spaces. 2. There shall be required the construction of curbs and gutters, including the construction of aprons at the points of ingress and egress, along the entire length of main street frontage designated for Lot 3, Block "F" Tract 7. - 3. There shall be required construction of pavement from curbing out to existing pavement along the entire length of main street frontage designated for Lot 3, Block "F", Tract 7. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #219 To allow the erection of an out - Applicant - Columbia Outdoor door advertising sign re - Advertising Co. presenting a directional sub- division sign. Size 10 ft. x 40 ft. Zoning is A-1 General Agricultural District. 4. y i Page ;7"5 Minutes - H. B'.'Planning Commission Wednesday, September 7yj, 1960 Located at the SVd corner of Stark Street and Beach Blvd., and legally described as Lots 70 and 71, Tract 417. The hearing was opened to the public Gilbert Hays, sales representative for Griswold Development,, addressed the Commission and explained the need for the sign. There being no further comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS 1. ADE BY THOYIPSON AND SECONDED BY PRESSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #219 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a SiOO.00 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Variance 4219. 2. Use Variance #219 shall expire one year from date granted. 3. The subdivision directional sign shall be removed by the applicant upon expiration of Use Variance ##219, the - penalty for failure to do so shall be the forfeiture of the performance bond. The City shall retain the right for entry and removal of sign upon expiration of Use Variance ##219. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: Letson. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV #i220 To allow a rear yard requirement Applicant - Moore Homes deviation to the R-1 Single Family Residence District. To permit a 5 ft. rear yard where it is replaced with a 20 ft. side yard. Located within a sub- division on the north side of Wintersburg Avenue, between the Edison Co. Right-of-way and Cannery Street and legally described as Lots 4, 9, 119 17, 19, 26, 28, 35, Tract 3430. The hearing was opened to the public, there being no comment it was closed. It was noted by the Commission that the same applicant had received identical 5. Page 746 Minutes -- H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1970 approval for similar cases within adjoining tracts. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND SECONDED BY THOMPSON TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #220 WITHOUT CONDITIONS. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. . ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #221 To allow the construction and Applicant - Steverson Bros operation of a 24 lane bowling alley and appurtenant services in the R-4 Suburban Residential District. Located at the SE corner of Garfield Avenue and Beach Blvd., and legally described.as that portion of the NW 4 of Section 1, T. 5. S. , R.11.ti'V. , SBB & M. as follows: Beginning at a point in the west line of said NW 4 distant North 1808.28 ft., from the SW corner thereof and running thence East 530.00 ft.; thence North parallel with said West line, to the North line of said Section; thence West 530.00 ft. to the NW corner thereof; thence South to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 255.00 ft. of the East 305.00 ft of the portion lying North of the South 657.72 ft. thereof. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM those portions conveyed to the State of California by deeds of records. The hearing was opened to the public, Joe Steverson, applicant, addressed the Commission and pre- sented sketches and a rendering of the -proposed bowling alley. The plot plan was also reviewed and discussed in relationship to the parking. There being no further 6. Page #7 Minutes H. B. Planning Commission 'ilednesday, September 7th, 1960 comment the hearing was closed.to the audience. Ivir Ste- verson was informed that the proposed parking was adequate for the bowling alley, but that he would be limited to less retail store space planned for the future as indicated on the plans because of future limitation on the parking. A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY PRESSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #221 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Where frontages as indicated on the plot plan abut Garfield Avenue, there shall be required dedication to the Master Plan of Arterial Highway width of 50 feet to the centerline of the street. 2. Where frontage as indicated on the plot plan abut Garfield Avenue and abut Beach Blvd., there shall be required curbs and gutters and pavement out to the existing pavement in accordance with the City or State Specifications whichever is applicable. Ex- ception may only be made where the City Engineer certifies that the required improvement, -are not practical from the viewpoint of street design. 3. Where the plot plan indicates proposed aprons for ingress and egress to abutting streets, such aprons shall be fully improved to City or State Standards. 4. Parking provisions shall comply with parking re- quirements as outlined in the "C-2" Community Bu- siness District. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: -None.- ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV ;222 To allow an addition to an existing Applicant - Harry Case single family residence in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. A yard variance is required to establish the permissible front and side yards for an uniquely shaped lot with a curvature on the front lot line. Located on the west side of the Y intersection of loth Street and Crest Avenue, and legally 7. Page #8 Minutes - H. B. Planning -Commission Wednesday, September 7th; 1960 described as Lots 13, 15; and a portion of Lot 16, Block 710, Huntingdon Beach Tract. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed. Chairman Bazil declared that this case was a good ex- ample of what the variance procedure was truly de- signed for. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY THOMPSON TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #222 WITHOUT CONDITIONS. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #223 Applicant - cnl iimhi a nute1nnr Afivi r_ To permit the erection of a double faced 10 ft .x 60 ft. directional subdivision sign in the R-4 District. Located at the NW corner of Beach Blvd., and Taylor Avenue and legally described as 40 ft. North of the South line of NE 4 of NE 4-of Section 35-5-11 SBB & M and also 107 ft. West of East line of NE 4 of NE a of Section 35-5-11 SBB & M. The hearing was opened to the public, there being no comment it was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND SECONDED BY THOMPSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #223 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1: There shall be posted a $100.00 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Variance #223• 2. Use Variance #223 shall expire one year from date granted. M S Page #9 Minutes --H. B. Planning'Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 3. The subdivision directional sign shall be removed by the applicant upon expiration of Use Variance #223, the penalty for failure to do so shall be the forfeiture of the performance bond. The City shall retain the right for entry and removal of sign upon. expiration of Use Variance #223. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: none. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED: USE PERMIT: UP #108 To allow a single face sign Applicant - Columbia Outdoor Advr. 10 ft. x 40 ft. on the SE corner of Garfield Street and Beach Blvd., and legally described as the NV'J 4 of the NW 4 of Section The hearing was opened to the public, there being no comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED BY TH012SON TO APPROVE USE PER1IT #108 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a $100.00 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit #108. 2. Use Permit #108 shall expire one year from date granted. 3: The subdivision directional sign shall be removed by the applicant upon expiration of Use Permit 7#108 the penalty -for failure to do -so shall be the for- feiture of the performance bond. The City shall retain the right for entry and removal of sign upon expiration of Use Permit #108. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: Letson. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. 0 10 Page r. 10 I,Iinutes - H. B. Planning'Commission Zednesday, September 7th, 1960 ZONE CASE NO 121 - CONTINUED CHANGE OF ZONE relative to Appli.cgnt - Chico Company, Inc' proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: M-1 Light Industrial District and A-1 General Agricultural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO M-1 Light Industrial District. Located on approximately 70 acres immediately west of the Bouleyard`Gardens Tract, bounded on the south by Heil Avenue, on the west by the P.E.R.R. R/W, on the north by Smeltzer Avenue, and on the east by the Boulevard Gardens Tract. The Secretary reported that because of a miscue, the Commission has the choice of two alternatives. Either deny the case without predjudice or reinstitute the zoning proceedings by readvertising. The concensus of the Commission was that they desired to reinstitute the proceedings for rezoning to M-1-A rather than M-1. A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO REINSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS FOR ZONE CASE NO 121 BY CHANGING THE PROPOSED ZONING TO M-1-A. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 133 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to Applicant - Ferro Corp. proposed change of district boundary and use class- ification from: M-1 Light Industrial District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO M-2-0 Industrial District. Located on approx 25 acres at the NE corner of Main Street and P.E.R.R. R/W. Legally described as Lots 19 21 31 49 59 6, and 10, Tract 37. 10. 11 LJ Page 111 T,Zinutes - H. B. Planning -Commission ;iednesday, September 7t111, 1960 The hearing was opened to the audience. Ralph Riggs, manager of the local branch of Ferro Corporation, addressed the Commission and explained the needsof the Company and how it was planning for ex- pansion. It was further explained that the demand for the company's products because of the extreme and constant changes in technological processes created an expansion schedule that could not be accurately planned for more than one year in advance. Consequently the company felt that it needed enough latitude to be prepared for any eventuality. - Wm. H. Gallienne, Chamber of Commerce executive spoke on behalf of the applicant. There being no further comment the hearing was closed to the audience. Discussion among the Commission re- solved itself to granting the M-2-0 Zoning temporarily until such time as the M-1-A Zoning District could be revised to provide for all situations the plastics and glass com- pany might encounter.. It was resolved that the M-1-A Zoning should be applied as soon as possible, inasmuch as the M-2-0 District was vague to the extent that the district did not provide the necessary detail to protect the company. RESOLUTION NO 133 A Resolution of the Planning Commission making Recommendation of approval �'or 'Lone Case No 133 to the City Council. A T,ZOTION WAS MADE BY THOMPSON AND SECONDED BY STANG TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 133. ROLL CALL VOTE: ~' AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairmqn Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. 11. 12 Page r12 Minutes - H. B. Planning -Commission '.'lednesday, September 7th, 1960 ZONE CASE NO 134 Resolution of Intent as Initiated by Resolution of Intent adopted by the City Planning Commission for CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: R-4 Suburban Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO R-5 P-M-T District. Located on the SE'ly side of Main Street with frontage extending from Huntington Avenue to approximately within 330 ft. of Beach Blvd., and legally described as Lots 1 thru 4, Block "F", Tract 7. Lots 1 thru 4, Block "G", Tract 7. Lots 1 thru 12, Tract 598. The hearing was opened to the audience. William Cardinall, 18662 Florida Street, addressed the Commission, and asked for explanation of R-5 P-M-T District. Mr Haynes, East Side Villa Tract, addressed the Commission and asked for detailed description of the zoning district boundary within the Kartron Street area. There being no further comment the hearing was closed to the audience. Commission discussion was held on the virtues of the proposed zoning. RESOLUTION NO 134 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission making Recommendation of Approval of Zone Case No 134 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 134. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ` THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. 12. 13 Page #13 Minutes - H. B. Planning -Commission `ilednesday, September 7th, 1960 ZONE CASE NO 135 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to Applicant - Houser Bros proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: R-1 Single Family Residence District TO R-5 P-M-T District. Located on approximately 60 acres lying 2640 ft. west of Bolsa Chica Street on the south side of Smeltzer Avenue, and legally described as the N 2 of SE 4 of NW 4 of Section 20, T.5.S.1 R.11.W.9 SBB & M and the NE 4 of NVI 4 of Section 20, T- 7. S. , R.11-W- , SBB & M. The hearing was opened to the audience. Vernon Houser, 14291 Graham Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and explained the pro- posed project. There being no further comment the hearing was closed. The absence of any development or plot plans was noted by the Commission. A MOTION 71AS MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED BY STANG TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF SEFTE14BER 20th, 1960. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutz, 'Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None; THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 136 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to Applicant - Gordon L. Sork proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: R-1 Single Family Residence District TO C-2 Community Business District. Located on approximately 10 acres at"the SW corner of Golden 'nest Street and bolsa Ave. 13. 14 Page #14 Minutes - H. B. PlanningCommission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 Legally described as follows: Note: On file in the Planning Department's Office. The hearing was opened to the public, there being no comment it was closed. Commission discussion followed. It was noted that the proposed zoning was advocated on the Master Land Use Plan. _RESOLUTION NO 136 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission making Recommendation of Approval for Zone Case No 136 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY PRESSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 136. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 137 Initiated by Resolution of Intent Resolution of Intent as adopted by the City Planning Commission for CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: R-4 Suburban Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located on approximately 10 acres north of Ellis Avenue and west of a centerline extended north of Florida Avenue, and legally described as the E z of W a of SE 4 of NE I of Section 35, T. 5. S. , R.11.W., SBB & M. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment it was closed. It was t 14. 15 Page ,r15 14inutes - H. B. Planning Commission ` Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 noted that the area was adjacent to an existing sub- division and that it was anticipated as a subdivision in the near future. RESOLUTION NO 137 A Resolution of the City P12zining Commission making Recommendation of approval for Zone Case No 137 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY THOMPSON AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 137. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE, NO 138 Resolution of Intent as adopted by Initiated by Reso. of Intent the City Planning Commission for CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: R-4 Suburban Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO R-2 Two -Family Residence District. Located on approximately 50 acres and lying generally within the confines of a line 330 ft. east of Florida Avenue, 250 ft. south of Main Street (with deviations), 330 ft. west of Delaware Street, and bordered on the south by Garfield Avenue. And further extended south of Garfield Avenue bounded by Delaware Street, Clay Street and Florida Avenue and further including a parcel 330 ft. by 660 ft. at the NW corner of Delaware Street and Clay Street. Legally described as follows: Block 2904 and 3004, East Side Villa Tract. Lots 13 thru 24, Tract 285. Blocks 2906-A, 2906-B, 2905, 3005, 3006, East Side Villa Tract. 15. 16 Page #16 Minutes - H. B. Planning -Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 Lots 1 thru 11, Mountain View Tract. Lots 19 thru 24, Block "H", Tract 7. Lots 5 thru 15, Block "G", Tract 7. Lots 5, 7, 10, 11, Block "F", Tract 7. CHANGE OF ZONE relative to pro- posed change of district boundary and use classification from: 11-1 Light Industrial District as adopted by Interim - Ordinance No 668 TO R-2 Two -Family Residence District. Located on approximately 6 2 acres and lying generally within the confines of the area described as the NE corner of Huntington Avenue and ClaJ7 Street and an area described as 330 ft. E'ly.of Huntington Avenue from Garfield Street north to approximately 200 ft. of Main Street. Legally described as follows: Lots 6, 89 9, Block "F", Tract 7. Block 2903, East side Villa Tract. Lots 1 thru 12, Tract 285. CHANGE OF ZONE relative to -pro- posed change of district boundary and use classification from: 1I-1 Light Industrial District as adopted by Interim Ordinance 668 TO R-5 P-11-T District. Located on approximately 10 acres within a half block bounded by Garfield Avenue on the north, Delaware Street on the east, and Huntington Avenue on the west. Legally described as Block 3103._, 31049 32049 3203, East Side Villa Tract. The Secretary read a letter of protest submitted by Firs Sylvia Shandrick. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mrs Sylvia Shandrick, 2282 Main Street, addressed 16. 17 Page 417 P..inutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 the Commission, and protested the proposed zoning. She further objected to the City Attorney's previous ruling that a minor error in the legal description did not void the intent of the notice inasmuch.as the proposed zoning classification was indicated. William Cardinall, 18662 Florida Avenue, H. B., addressed the Commission and asked for further details on the limits of the proposed zoning. Thomas Linton, 7882 Kartron Street, H. B., addressed the Commission and wanted to know how both sides of Kartron Street were to be zoned. He also asked about the status of an existing non -conforming use. Delphino Perez, Fountain Valley, addressed the Commission and wanted to know what the previous zoning of County R-4 Suburban Residential District allowed in comparison with the new proposed zoning. Daniel Contreraz, 19042 Delaware Avenue, H. B., addressed the Commission and protested that he could not develop his curbs and gutters because of proposed street widening. The Chairman explained that the problem.did not concern the zoning case. Mr Contreraz then asked that a city official visit hiq on Sunday and straighten his problem out. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed to the audience. Chairman.Bazil and Commissioner Thompson withdrew from participation in the discussion.of Zone Case 138. Vice -Chairman Stang took the chairmanship and conducted the meeting for Zone Case 138. RESOLUTION NO 138 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission making Recommend cation of Zone Case No 138 for approval to the City Council. 17. fWe Page #18 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission "7ednesday, September 7th, 1960 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMA.N AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 138. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Kaufman, Vice -Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSTAINED: Thompson, Chairman Bazil. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 140 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to Applicant - Dr Adrian Hubbell proposed change of district boundary and use classification from: R-1 Single Family Residence District TO C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. Located at the NW corner of Smeltzer Avenue and Golden West Street and legally described as follows: That portion of SE 4 of SE a of Section 15, T.5.S.9 R.11.j'T., SBB & M described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of said Section 15, said point being the intersection of the center lines of Golden West Street and Smeltzer Avenue thence North 613.00 ft., thence West 208.00-ft., thence South 612.14 ft. to the S'ly line of said Section 15; thence South 89045'5011 East 208.UO ft. to the point of beginning. The hearing was opened to the audience. Dr Adrian Hubbell, 123 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach, addressed the Commission and stated that he was only interested in a professional office building. the hearing was closed. There being no further comment The Commission indicated its desire to consider the Zone Case for R-5 P-M-T District Zoning instead of the C-1 District Zoning. Dr. Hubbell 18. 19 Page #19 Einutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 consented to the recommendation and indicated that he would amend the application. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO WITHOLD ACTION OF ZONE CASE NO 140 UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE APPLICATION WAS AMENDED AND RE - ADVERTISED AT NO COST TO THE APPLICANT. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 141 Resolution of Intent as adopted Initiated by Reso of Intent by the City Planning Commission for CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed change of district -boundary and use classification .from: R-4 Suburban Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 6_o8 TO R-2 Two -Family Residence District. Located on approximately 11 acres on the west side of Delaware Avenue lying between Ellis Avenue and Main Street. Legally described as Lots 2, 4, 61 8, and y, Block "C", Tract 7. The hearing was opened to the public. The Secretary made a recommendation that all action be witheld until the Huntington Beach Co. could meet with the city officials regarding a proposed oil drilling site in place of the site existing where the Ferro Corporation currently plans expansion. A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 20th, 1960. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. 19. , 20 Page #20 Minutes - H. B. Planning, Commission Wednesday, September 7th, 1960 The Chairman called recess at 10.00 P.-M. The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 10.20 P. M. PUBLIC HEARING: REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHAPTER 96 - PROPOSED MRINA ZONING The hearing was opened to the public there being no comment the hearing was closed. The Chairman asked that the hearing be continued to allow Commission members more time to read and study the new chapter. The Secretary reviewed briefly the ob- jectives of the proposed ordinance and somefthe major controls which were featured within the ordinance. A MOTION WAS MADE BY THOMPSON AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO CONTINUE.: THE HEARING TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTE143ER 20, 1960. THE MOTION CARRIED. HELICOPTER SERVICE: Proposal to establish a policy ruling -- Is it permitted within the C-3 Business'District. Discussion was held by the Commission which was concluded by the thought that the Helicopter service was not a desirable use in a congested central business area. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO DENY RECOGNITION OF THE HELI- COPIER SERVICE AS A PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE C-3 DISTRICT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Thompson, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. REPORT ON THE PROPOSED The Secretary present edlthe 5 ACRE ANNEXATION ON HEIL AVENUE - 1dr Jay, Property County Variance in detail and Owner. indicated that the applicant's proposed trailer park hinged upon the applicant's 20. 21 Page #21 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission: Vrednesday, September 7th, 1960 abilityi'to reach a connected domestic sewer system. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY THOMPSON TO MAKE THE FOLL017ING FINDINGS OF DENIAL TO THE REQUEST: BUT NOT-YREDJUDICE FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR ANNEXATION. 1. In terms of revenue to the City the proposed trailer park would be a liability rather than an asset. 2. Sufficient control over the trailer park was lacking. 3. Five acres of annexation would serve no real advantage to the city and would be costly in terms of time and effort. That annexations which considered by the city should be of an area large enough to be of consequence to the city. THE MOTION CARRIED. DOG CLIPPING SERVICE: Proposed esto.blishment of a policy ruling - is it permitted with the C-3 Business District Discussion was held on the question. Chairman Bazil pointed out that a dog clipping service was operating in the middle of a prominent Costa Mesa Shopping Center. It was suggested that the Planning Director seek out the results and problems of the currently existing Dog Clipping Service in Costa Mesa. A MOTION WAS 1r7ADE BY THOMPSON AND SECONDED BY PRESSON TO CONTINUE ACTION ON THE REQUEST TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING - SEPTEMBER 209 1960. THE MOTION CARRIED. RESTRICTION OF HEAVY The Commission agreed that a -review TRUCKS FROM PARKING ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS: of the problem was in order and recommended that a proposed ord- inance be presented for adoption. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS - THE MEETING 1 Clif rd E. Tripp Secretary ADJOURNED. Robert Bazil Chairman 21.