HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-01-17123
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
Tuesday,. January 17th, 1961
COI,iMISSIONERS PRL'.SENT: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman,
Stang, Chairman Bazil.
C01,21ISSIONERS ABSENT: Letson.
MINUTES: On motion by Stang and seconded
by Presson, the Minutes of the
Huntington Beach Planning Commission of January 4th, 1961,
as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary were accepted
as mailed.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #251 To allow a single dwelling
An-olicant - Cont. from Jan 4.
Charles A. Peerenboom to be attached to existing
non -conforming dwelling in the R-2 District. Located
north of Hartford Street and west of California Avenue,
and legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block
803, Vista del Mar Tract. Except the E. 87.50 ft. of the
S. 95 ft. of said lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, also except the N.
13 ft. of the E. 65 ft. of said Lot 5.
The hearing was opened to
the public, there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
Discussion at length followed.
Commission opinion indicated the decision to require
removal of the attached single car garage.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO DENY AREA VARIANCE AV #251.
REASONS FOR DENIAL.
1. Existing house did not conform to Uniform Building
Code.
2.. Insufficient area on lot would not facilitate the
proposal.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
I.24
Page #2
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #246 To allow the construction of
Applicant -
FreewaX Enterprises Inc frame building 16 ft. x 24 ft.
and asphalt karting track 150 ft x 250 ft. in the R-1
Single Family Residence District. Property known as
Hickory House restaurant at the intersection of Highway
101-A and Beach Blvd. Legally described as that portion
of the NW 4 of the SW 4 of Section 13, T.6.S., R.11.W.,
SBB & M., containing 77,339 sq. ft., located on the NW
corner of U.S. Highway 101 and State Highway 39•
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Geo Hadley, 3540 Wilshire Blvd., legal council
for State of California, Division of Highways, indicated
that the State was the property owner and that the
applicant had no lease with the State for the proposal.
He went on record as opposing the proposed variance.
R. J. Lambert, representing the
applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that it was
his belief that the State would approve the lease if the
variance were granted.
Jack Miller, representing the
applicant, told the Commission that several such proposed
tracks were operating successfully within the County.
He named one track in Garden Grove and another at Highway
39 and Lincoln Ave. in Anaheim.
There being no further comment
the hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed.-
t 2.
125
Page #3
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
THE MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO DENY USE VARIANCE UV #246 WITH
THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIED REASONS:
1. No ground lease.
2. Traffic hazard, and noise and activity would be
detrimental to surrounding developments.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
.AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #255 To allow the construction of
Applicant -
Title Insurance & Trust Co.a single family residence and
tool machine and storage shed in the M-1-A Restricted
Manufacturing District. Located approximately 545 ft.
eouth of Bolsa Avenue and east of Graham Street and
legally described as being a portion of the NE j of Section
16, T.5.S., R.11.W., SBB & M.
The hearing was opened to the
public. Milford W. Dahl, representative of Aldrich R.
Peck Estate, addressed the Commission and explained the
problems the applicant was faced with. He arbitrated
the recommend conditions to what he believed equitible
for his client.
There being no further comment
the hearing was closed.'
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED PRESSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #255
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. UV #255 shall be approved for an indeterminate
period until such time as industrial development
occurred within 200 ft. of the dwelling. At such
time the dwelling use shall be discontinued.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
3•
126
Page #4
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #256 To allow the construction of a
Applicant -
Harry Tancredi four unit apartment dwelling in
the R-2 Residence District. Located west of England Street
on the south side of Joliet Street, and legally described
as Lots 9 and 10, Block 905, Vista del Mar Tract.
The Secretary read•a letter
submitted by George Farquhar, protesting the variance.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. E. H. Miller, 1017 England St., H. B., presented
a letter which was signed by 30 adjoining property owners
protesting the proposed variance.
Charles Frost, 1010 Delaware Ave., H. B., addressed the
Commission, stated that he protested the proposed variance
on the grounds that it would be detrimental to surrounding
propertied.
Mrs. Clara Copeland, 2904 Delaware Ave., H. B., addressed
the Commission, and protested on the grounds that the
higher density than the code permitted would not be
desirable for the neighborhood.
Mrs. Miller, 1017 England St., H. B., addressed the
Commission, protested the proposed variance. She advocated
R-1 Districting for the neighborhood. Chairman Bazil
suggested that she and her neighbors petition the Commission
for the R-1 if they so desired such a zone.
Harry Tancredi, the applicant, addressed the Commission,
stated that he did not wish to oppose the neighborhood.
He stated that he believed the proposed construction would
be in asset to the surrounding properties.
Mrs. Grace P. Shuttes, addressed the Commission, stated
that she opposed the variance. She argued that the exist-
ing multiple units were a nuisance.
Joe Campbell, 1108 England Street, H. B., addressed the
Commission, protested the variance.
Merle Hughs, 911 England St., H. B., addressed the Commission,
protested the variance.
There being no further comment the
hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed.
4.
127
Page #5
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
Chairman Bazil indicated his belief that the neighborhood
as a majority was against the proposal and that their
wishes should be considered.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND
SECONDED BY STANG TO DENY USE VARIANCE UV #256 FOR THE
FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. Majority of neighborhood opposed.
2. No hardship was proven by the applicant.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang', Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #257
Applicant -
Harry.Tancredi
To allow the construction of
four unit apartment dwelling
in the R-2 Residence District. Located west of England
Ave., south of Knoxville St., and legally described as
Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, Block 1005, Vista del Mar Tract.
The Secretary informed the
Chairman that an improper legal description was submitted,
therefore no.action could be taken.
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN, CHAIRMAN
BAZIL ORDERED THE SECRETARY TO READVERTISE THE VARIANCE
REQUEST UPON SUBMITTAL OF THE CORRECT INFORMATION.
USE VARIANCE: UV ;#258 To allow the construction of
Applicant -
Harry Tancredi four one story two bedroom duplexes
in the R-2 Residence District. Located on the south side
of Geneva Street, and legally described as Lots 27, 280 29,
and 30, Valley View Tract, except the south 2 ft. of Lot
30.
The Secretary reported that an
improper legal description had been submitted.
5.
128
Page ##6
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN, CHAIRMAN
BAZIL ORDERED THE SECRETARY TO READVERTISE THE VARIANCE
REQUEST UPON SUBMITTAL OF THE CORRECT INFORMATION.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4o39
No of Lots: 576 Subdivider: Buccola Invest. Co.
Total Acreage: 170t Engineer: Lowry & Assoc.
To allow the following described
lots to deviate from Section 9741.4 Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code:
Lotb,2 thru 24, 29 thru 44, 47 thru 63, 68 thru.84, 87 thru 103,
108 thru 124, 127 thru 142, 148 thru 163, 167 thru 181, 186 thru
202, 206 thru 223, 227 thru 246, 250 thru 268, 275 thru 290, 304
thru 347, 350 thru 365, 370 thru 384,387 thru 396, 402 thru 413,
416 thru 423, 428 thru 436, 439 thru 445,-449 thru 455, 458 thru
463, 468 thru 473, 476 thru 4819 486 thru 491, 494 thru 499, 504
thru 509, 512 thru 517, 522 thru 527, 530 thru 535, 540 thru 545.
The above listed lots to have 50 ft or more frontage with a
minimum of 5000 sq ft with water frontage for each lot. Code
normally requires 60 ft frontage and 6000 sq ft of area as
minimums.
Lots 1, 45, 46, 85, 86, 125, 126 164, 165, 204, 205, 248, 249
291, 303, 348, 349, 385, 386, 4142 415, 4371 438, 456, 457, 474,
475, 492, 493, 510, 511, 528, 529, 546. The above listed lots
to have 6000 sq ft minimum lot area with water frontage for
each lot. Code normally requires 7000 sq ft for all corner lots.
Lots 292 thru 302 to have 50 ft of frontage with 5000 sq ft
of lot area as inland lots without water frontage. Code normally
requires 60 ft frontage with 6000 sq ft of area.
Located approximately 170
acres generally lying south of Slater Ave. and west of Edwards
St. The Extension of Springdale St. would intersect the tract.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. George Buccola, 3700 Newport Beach Blvd., Newport
Beach, addressed the Commission, and stated that he was the
developer and that he wished to cooperate in every way to
expedite the approval of the Conditional Exception.
6.
129
Page ##7
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
Mr. Charles W. Dougan, Water &
Air Pollution Control Engineer, addressed the Commission,
stated that he was only at this hearing as an interested
observer. He told the Commission that the water pollution
control district would not have control over the project
as it is presently planning. He stated that the Orange
County Water District would assume jurisdiction of the
Water problem.
Mr. Harold Pedersen, Superintendent
of Ocean View School District, addressed the Commission,
and stated that for the record the Board of Trustees still was
seeking a school site within the proposed subdivision. He
stated that if any satigfactory* alternatives could be worked
out, that he and the School Board would be happy to meet
with the developer and discuss the problem.
Mr. John Toups, District Engineer
of Orange County Water District, addressed the Commission,
he explained that the problem of providing a water source
for the proposed marina was not at present clearly enough
defined to enable the Orange County Water Board to make
findings. He told the Commission if in the future the
Water District found that the underground water supply was
.in jeopardy; the Water District could at that time take
appropriate measures to correct the problem.
Mr. C. Blackburn, representative
for Coast Realty, addressed the Commission and stated that
he was in favor of the proposed lot sizes. He stated that
he had knowledge of Mr. Buccolas reputation and capabilities
In the construction business and that his reputation was
the highest.
7.
130
Page #8
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
Milo Keith, representing the Buccola
Development, addressed the Commission, and brought the
Commission up to date on the most recent changes made on
the Tentative Map. He explained how the channels were
widened to 110 ft and how the channel was bent up to the
northwest in order to shorten the channel lengths. He
expressed his every intention to cooperate with the Commission
in seeking approval for his developer's map.
There being no further comment the
hearing was closed. Commission discussion at length followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. Lots 291 thru 302 shall not be approved as requested,
but rather shall be required to meet subdivision code
requirements for lot area and lot frontage applicable
to inland type lots.
2. All 5000 sq ft interior lots with 50 ft frontage as
requested shall have water frontage maintained the
entire width at rear of lot.
3. All 6000 sq ft corner lots with 60 ft frontage as
requested shall have water frontage maintained equal
to the width at rear of lot.
4. All proposed channels shall have a minimum width of
110 ft.
5. All proposed channels shall be lined with concrete type
bulkhead retaining walls and shall be subject to
Planning Commission approval as to location, height,
crows -section design, material, and time of installation.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy,.Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 149 CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to proposed
Applicant -
Five Points Area change of district boundary and use
classification from: R-4-X Suburban Residential District,
8.
131
Page #9
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
as adopted by Interim Ordinance No. 668 TO C-2 Community
Business District.
Located on approximately 8 acres
on the west side of Beach Blvd., north of Ellis.Avenue, in
the Five Points area, and legally described as follows:
The following portions of the
BE 4 of the NE a of Section 35-5-11. The E. 348.48 ft. of the
N. 497.76 ft. of the S. 824.67 ft., and the E. 659.88 ft.
of the S. 329.91 ft. thereof; EXCEPTING THEREFROM all dedi-
cated streets and parcels deeded to the state of California
for Highway Purposes.
The hearing was opened to the
public.. Mr. F. Bowen, 5246 E. Florence Avenue, Whittier,
addressed the Commission and stated that as a representative
for the Wade property, he was advocating commercial zoning.
Mr. Herbert D. Porter, 18381
Beach Blvd., H. B., addressed the Commission, and stated
that he was in favor of granting change of zone for commercial
uses.
Mrs. Viola Gibbs, 18451 Beach
Blvd., H. B., addressed the Commission, and also spoke in
favor of Zone Case No 149. She advocated commercial uses.
There being no further comment
the hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed.
Chairman Bazil suggested that the proposed change of zone
be zoned to 0-4 District which has not been as yet adopted.
The Commission recommended that the
hearing be readvertised within sixty days to be zoned as
C-4 District.
A MOTION WAS MADE -BY STANG AND
SECONDED BY PRESSON TO READVERTISE THE HEARING OF ZONE CASE
NO 149 TO THE SECOND MEETING OF MARCH 14th, 1961 FOR C-4
DISTRICT ZONING.
9.
132
Page #10
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 165. CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to
Applicant -
Alfred Edelsohn proposed change of district
boundary and use classification from: A-1-X County.Land
Use Ordinance No. 351, as adopted by Interim Ordinance No.
668 TO R-1 Single Family Residence District.
Located on approximately 15.4
acres on the South side of Blaylock Place and_200 ft..east
of Beach Blvd., and legally described as:
Tract 3953 being a portion of the
NW 4 of the NW 4 of Section 25-5-11.
The hearing was_ opened. to the
audience, there being no comment it was closed.
Commission discussion was held
at length. It was pointed out that the tract was soon to
be constructed and that the R-1 zoning was a routine procedure.
RESOLUTION NO 165 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Making Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case No 165
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 165.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 166 CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to
Applicant -
Loland Homes, Inc. proposed change of district
A. L. Gindling, Sec.
boundary and use classification
from: R-1 Single Family Residence District TO C-2
10.
133
Page #11
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
Community Business District.
Located on approximately 8 acres
on the NE corner of Smeltzer Ave. and Springdale St.
Further legal description on
file in the Planning Dept. Office.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Jeff Millet, Engineer of Millet & King Assoc.,
addressed the Commission and stated that he was in favor of
granting Zone Case No 166. He pointed out that the Master
Plan for the tract involved over 550 acres with approximately
2000 homes to be built. He further point out that the site
was logically located diagonally across from the Huntington
Village shopping center site.
the hearing was closed.
at length.
There being no further comment
The Commission held a discussion
RESOLUTION NO 166 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission i•iaking Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case No 166
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 166.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 167
Applicant -
First ?•lestern Bank & 'crust
CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to
proposed change .of district
boundary and use claysification from: 11-1 Light Manufacturing
District TO R-1 Single Family Residence District.
Located approximately 1320 ft.
west of Beach Blvd., on the north side of Sugar Avenue with
an area of approximately 28 acres.
11.
134_
Dage #12
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
Legally described as that portion
of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section
14, T.5.S., R.11.W., SBB & M., lying northeasterly of that
certain parcel of land conveyed to the State of California
by deed recorded September 24, 1954, in Book 2825, Page 463,
of the official records of Orange County.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the south
287.21 ft. of the east 227.50 ft.
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Jeff Millet, Engineer of Millet & King Assoc.,
addressed the Commission, and stated that the limited frontage
along Sugar Ave. reduced the value of the property for M-1
purposes. He further pointed out the existing subdivision
to the east.
Fire Chief Higgins, addressed
the Commission, and stated that he would prefer R-1 Zoning,
reasons given, that .from a fire protection standpoint it
could more easily be serviced as residential development,
and that for fire protection purposes the M-1 development
would prove costly to the city.
the hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 167
There being no further comment
A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Making -Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case No 167
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND
SECONDED BY PRESS09 TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 167.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
12.
P -e #13
ginutes - H. B. Planning Conmission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
ZONE CASE 110 168 CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to
Applicant -
Cox Bros proposed change of district
boundary and use classification from: R-1 Single Family
Residence District TO M-1 Light Manufacturing District.
Located on approximately 1.78 acres
at the -NE corner of Sugar Avenue and legally described as:
Being that portion of the SW 4 of the
NE 4 of Section 14, T.5.S., R.11.W., in Rancho Las Bolsa
Chica in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange,
State of California as recorded in Book 51, page 13 of
Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County lying SW'ly of
the State Highway known as the San Diego Freeway, bounded
on the W by the S. Pacific Railroad RAW and on the south
by Sugar Avenue.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Jeff Millet, Engineer, addressed the Commission, and stated
that the acreage was triangular in shape and incompatible
with logical subdivision development. He pointed out that
the property was adjacent to the P.E. R.R. and immediately
north of an existing M-1 District area which had recently
been zoned.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed. Discussion at length by the Commission
followed.
RESOLU`.PION NO 168 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Making Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case 1,To 168
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO ADOPT.RESOLUTION NO 168.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AXES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
13.
99T
Page ##14
Minutes - H. B. Planning Department
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
ZONE CASE NO 169 CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to
Applicant -
Tony Luis proposed change of district
boundary and use classification from: R-4-X Suburban
Residential District, as adopted by Interim Ordinance No.
668 TO C-2 Community Business District.
Located on approximately 4.33
acres on the west side of Beach Blvd., north of Taylor Ave.,
legally described as: The S J-of the SE of the NE 4 of
the NE I of Section 35, T.5.S.0 R.11.W., Orange County,
California.
The hearing was opened to the
public. Tony Luis, the applicant, addressed the Commission
and explained that he was currently working out details
of his lease and that he would be amenable to a continuance
if that was the desire of the Commission.
the hearing was closed.
There being no further comment
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO CONTINUE ZONE CASE NO 169 TO THE
NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7th, 1961, AT 8:00 P.M.
OR AS SOON THEREAFTER.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP #113 To allow the erection of a 10 ft x
Applicant -
James Dean 30 ft. double face subdivision
directional sign. Located on the NE corner of Atlanta Avenue
and Beach Blvd., and legally described as the south 295 ft.
of the west 386 ft of the SW a of Section 12-6-11 SBB & M.
The hearing was opened to the
audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed.
14.
991
Pa. ge ;'#15
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND
SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE USE PERMIT #113 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. There bhall be posted a $250.00 performance bond
guaranteeing removal upon expiration of.Use Permit
#113.
2. Use Permit #113 shall expire one year from date granted.
3. The subdivisional directional sign shall be removed
by the applicant upon expiration of Use Permit #113 the penalty for failure to do so shall be the for-
feiture of the performance bond. The City shall retain
the right for entry and removal of sign upon expiration
of Use Permit #113.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING: STRE'�'T NAMES CHANGE
PROPOSED: Smeltzer Avenue to
Edinger Avenue.
Wintersburg Avenue to
?darner Street. Talbert
Avenue to remain the same.
The hearing was opened to the
audience, there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
Chairman Bazil asked for comment
from the Commission. Concensus of -opinion was that the
need for county -wide street names existed, and that now
was time to change, if the city ever hoped to accomplish
such a task. The job of changing street names would be
multiplied many times over should the city attempt the
task after the street frontages were fully developed.
The Commission further emphas±zed
that there was no public reaction to the proposal at the
public hearing.
15.
89T
Page #16
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
A. MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY PRESSON TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE PROPOSED
STREET NAME CHANGES AS OUTLINED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY STREET
NAMING COMMITTEE.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION - OUTDOOR ADVERTISING:
A letter was read to the Planning
Commission recommending that all new outdoor advertising
structures be eliminated from the city excepting those which
would advertise the business being conducted on the premises
or those advertising structures classified as temporary
directional subdivision signs.
Discussion was continued on the
subject of amortizing all existing structures to a five year
amortization period. It was felt that the moratorium
ordinance should be attempted first for public reaction,
since it was agreed that the amortization ordinance could
prove a difficult project.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO PREPARE A
PROPOSED REVISION TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE DECLARING A MORATORIUM
ON ALL NEW OUTDOOR ADVERTISING STRUCTURES.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, s Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: Worthy.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
16,
L91
139
Page #17
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17t!_, 1961
USE VARIANCE: UV ,259 To allow the erection of a 20 ft x
Applicant -
Holstein & Sons 60 ft temporary subdivision sign
in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located approx-
imately 1000 ft south of Heil Avenue on the east side of
Beach Blvd., and legally described as the Wily 200 ft of the
S I of the NW 4 of the SW 4 of Section 24--5-11.
The hearing was opened to the
audience, there being no comment it was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #259 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. There shall be posted a $250.00 performance bond
guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Variance
#259.
2. Use Variance #259 shall expire one year from date granted.
3. The subdivision directional sign shall be removed by the
applicant upon expiration of Use Variance #259 - the
penalty for failure to do so shall be the forfeiture
of the performance bond. The City shall retain the
right for entry and removal of sign upon expiration
of Use Variance #259.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASES 155, 158 and 159
A lengthy discussion was held
on Zone Case No 155, 158, & 159 which had been referred
to the Planning Commission by the City Council for further
study. Zone Case No 128 was tabled for the present.
The importance of Zone Case No
159 was emphasized as being the property on which the
17.
140
Page #18
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
Sanitation District either owned or was acquirittg'.. Zone Case
No 155 was the property immediately to the west of the Sanitation
Plant.
RESOLUTION NO 1550 A Resolution of the Planning
Commission Peaking Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case No 155
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO ADOPT: RESOLUTION NO 1550.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
RESOLUTION NO 1580 A Resolution of the Planning
Commission Making Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case No 158
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 1580.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Kaufman, Worthy, Stang; Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
RESOLUTION NO 1590 A Resolution of the Planning
Commission Making Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case 1,10 159
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY DOUTT TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 1590.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
18.
Page #19
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, January 17th, 1961
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
the meeting adjourned.
Clifford E. Tripp
Secretary
There being no further business
19.
r 0 � /,C, e Q
, , I
Robert Bazil
Chairman
Z7F1