HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-05-02238
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT:
MINUTES:
Council Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
Presson,•Letson, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang,
Chairman Bazil.'
Doutt.
On motion by Presson and seconded by
Worthy, the Minutes of the Huntington
Beach Planning Commission of April 18th, 1961, as transcribed
and mailed by the Secretary were accepted as mailed.
USE PERMIT: UP #125 To allow three double face 10 ft x 30 ft.
Applicant - Columbia
Outdoor Advertising Co_ subdivision directional signs within
two subdivision Tracts No 3847 and Tract No 3848. Located at
the SE corner of Bolsa Ave. and Springdale St., and at the NE
dorner of Springdale and Smeltzer Ave.
The hearing was opened to the audience,
there being no comment the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED
BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 125 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Setback 65 feet from the centerline of Bolsa.
Setback 55 feet from the centerline of Springdale.
Setback 55 feet from the centerline of Edinger (Smeltzer) and
Standard Conditions. There shall be 15' from the ground level
to the bottom of the sign.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Doutt.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP #126
Applicant - Columbia
Outdoor Advert. Co.
To allow one 10 ft x 40 ft subdivision
directional sign, located on the south
239
Page #2
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
side of Smeltzer Ave. approximately 500 ft. east of Spring-
dale Street, and legally described as the NW 4 of the NW 4
of Section 22-5-11.
Commissioner Doutt arrived at
7:40 P.M.
The hearing was opened to the
public, there being no comment the hearing•was•closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND
SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 126 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Setback 55 feet from the centerline of Edinger (Smeltzer)
and Standard Conditions.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Letson, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang,
Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP ;#127 To allow the construction of a
Applicant - Columbia
Outdoor Advert. Co. double face 10 ft x 40 ft sign
within a Tract No 3846. Located on the south side of
Bolsa Avenue, west of Edwards Street.
The hearing was opened to the
audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 127 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Setback 65 feet from centerline of Bolsa.
Setback 47 feet from future centerline of Edwards, and
Standard Qonditions.
-2-
Page #3
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961 .
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP #128 To allow the construction of a 10 ft ,
Applicant - Columbia
Outdoor -Advert. Co, x 40 ft. subdivision directional sign.
Located east of Beach Blvd..approximately 400 ft. south of
Garfield, and legally described as 400 ft south of the north
line of the NW 4 of NW 4 of Section 1-6-11 and 75 f t . east
of the west line of the NW 4 of NW 4 of Section 1-6-11.
The hearing was opened to the public,
there being no comment it was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 128 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Standard Conditions.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None,
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #288 To allow a subdivision directional
Applicant -
E. L. Byron sign 12 ft x 36 ft in the R-4-X
District. Located at the NE corner of Beach Blvd. and Clay
Street, and legally described as 200 ft north of the S line
of the NW 4 of the NW 4 of Section 1-6-11 and 50 ft east'of the
west line of the NW 4 of the N14 4 of Section 1-6-11.
The hearing was opened to the
audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed.
-3-
Page #4
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961 _
The Secretary reported that the field
investigation showed there to be no signs within 300' on either
side of the proposed sign and that the setback would be suffi-
cient. _ `
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND SECONDED
BY DOUTT TO APPROVE UV #288 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
No map received showing signs within 3001. If approved standard
conditions, and 22 feet setback from property line on Beach
Blvd.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV -#1290 To allow the construction of a Mausoleum
Applicant - Roselawn
Gardens of Memory Assoc. in the R-4-X Suburban Residential
District. Located north of Talbert Avenue and approximately
180 ft east of Beach Blvd., and legally described as the S z
of the SW 4 of the SW 4 of Section 25, together with the SW 4
of the SE 4 of the SW 4 of Section 25-5-11 SBB & M.
The Secretary read the proposed conditions
outlined by the Planning Dept.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Dr. David Payne, applicant, addressed the Commission and requested
that variance be granted without conditions.
There being no further comment, the
hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed at length.
The Commissioners questioned Dr. Payne
as to why he felt the conditions should not be required. Dr.
Payne pointed out that the land he would be required to dedicate
-4-
9N;
Page #5
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1951
to the City for street purposes was land that had been dedicated
for cemetery purposes.
Chairman Bazil pointed out that these
conditions have been required on all variances that are either
of a commercial use or a commercial nature and they should be
required on this variance as well as those in the past or
those we will have in the future.
Dr. Payne also stated that additional
buildings would eventually be constructed on the property to
conform to the normal operating of a cemetery and would be
located along Talbert Ave.
Dr. Payne read a statement -on behalf
of Roselawn Gardens of Memory Assoc-. stating their position and
that the regulations concerning the installation and operations
of a cemetery are controlled by -the California Cemetery Assoc.
as provided for by an act by the State Legislature. Dr. -Payne
further stated that under the Act it is'not necessary to apply
to the City Building Department for a permit or file for -a use
variance through the Planning Department.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE UV #290 WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
The dedications of an additional 20' of right-of-way along the -
entire 1,749.20 feet of property fronting on Talbert Ave.
Full improvements along the most westerly 293.04 feet of property
fronting on Talbert Ave. lying east of the intersection of
Talbert Ave. and Beach Blvd.
Based on the following findings of fact..
A hardship would be imposed on the property on the south side
of Talbert, Ave. if they were required to make up the 20' in
addition to their 20' dedication.
The use requested would increase the amount of traffic along
the property of the applicant, fronting on Talbert Ave:
-5-
UE;
243
Page #6
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
The street width is not adequate enough to accommodate the
increase of traffic along Talbert Ave. which would be brought
about by the proposed use of the property, if the dedication
were not required.
The entrance will be on Talbert Ave. approximately 800' east
of Beach Blvd., which will cause an additional traffic burden
in front of the applicants property.
Present zoning is R-4-X Suburban Residential District as
,Adopted by Interim Ordinance 668.
USE VARIANCE: UV #291 To allow the erection of a subdivision
Applicant E. L. Byron directional sign 10 ft x 25 ft in the
A-1-X General Agricultural District. Located at SE corner
of Graham Street and'Heil Avenue and legally described as the
W 2 of the NW 4 of the SE 4 of• Section 21-5-11.
The Secretary informed the Commission,
that the applicant asked for withdrawal of Use Variance #291.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED
BY PRESSON TO GRANT THE WITHDRAWAL OF UV #291.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Vresson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #293 To allow the construction of a screened
Applicant -
William H. Creed in aluminum patio cover to be added to
existing dwelling in the R-1 Single Family Residence District.
Located at 7662 Danube Drive, Huntington Beach, and legally
described as Lot 146, Tract 3420. An encroachment of 9 ft
:t
into the required 20 ft rear yard setback.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Jerry Kline, 7245 Harding Circle, City, a representative from
the awnin01
g company addressed the Commission and explained that
the patio cover would meet the side yard setbacks and showed
pictures of the proposed patio.
*-; I ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Dout-t,
Worthy, Stang, Kaufman
Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None. -6-
'THE MOTION CARRIED.
244
Page #7
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May'2nd, 1961
Bud Higgins, Fire Chief, told`the Commission
that they had no objections to the proposal as long as the required
side yard was maintained. The Chief further pointed out that
the screened in patios are becoming more popular and is being
accepted by the public as a type of California living.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED
BY WORTHY TO APPROVE UV #293 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
That the side yard requirement be maintained.
That the patio be inclosed with nothing more than screen.
ZONE,CASE-NO 185 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed change
Applicant -
Doyle & Shields of district boundary and use classification
from: R-1 Single Family Residence District TO C-2 Community
Business District. The following parcels of real property as
submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith:
Located on approximately 4 acres bounded by Smeltzer Ave. on
the south and approximately 800.00 ft west of Springdale St.,
and legally described as -the NE 4 of the NE 4 of Section 21-5-11
SBB & M. Further legal description on file in the Planning Dept.
Office.
The hearing was opened to the public.
Frank Doyle, 831 So. Manchester, Anaheim, Calif., addressed the
Commission, and pointed out that to have a good commercial
center the additional zoning would be necessary. He also pointed
- out that he has many potential tenants who have indicated they
would move into the center but felt there should be a larger area.
• There being no further comment, the hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 185 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission`
Recommending Approval of Zone Case No 185
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS fitADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED
BY LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 185, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
FINDING OF FACT. 6
* ;;1 ROLL CALL VOTE: - 7
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Chairman Bazil,
NOES: None. Kaufman.
ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED.
245
Page #8
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
That the property lies adjacent to an existing C-2 District
which is in need of expansion to provide a more suitable
shopping center.
Property lies adjacent to a primary highway.
That the additional commercial area falls within the percent-
age of land use in relationship to residential area.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 186 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed change of
Applicant -
Loland Homes, Inc. district boundary and use classification
A. L. Gindling
from: R-1 Single Family Residence District
TO C-2 Community Business District. The following parcel of
real property as submitted on the applicant's petition is
described herewith: Located on approximately 11.8 acres bounded
by Springdale St. on the east and Bolsa Ave. on the south, and
legally described as the NW 4 of Section 15-5-11 SBB & M.
Further legal description on file in the Planning Dept. Office.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Jeff Millet, representing Millet, King & Assoc., addressed the
Commission, and pointed out the proposal by the applicant,
A. L. Gindling. He stated that A. L. Gindling was being advised
by Coldwell Banker, a Real Estate from Los Angeles, and they
felt the corner could be put to its best use as commercial.
There being no further comment, the hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 186 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission
Making Recommendation of Approval of Zone
Case No 186 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED
BY PRESSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 186, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
FINDING OF FACT:
�46
Page #9
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
That the commercial area falls within the percentage of land
use in relation to residential areas.
The property lies adjacent to both a major arterial highway and
a primary arterial highway.
The commercial area will be needed to serve the new subdivisions
now under construction in the area.
ROLL CALL: VOTE :
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 187 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed
Applicant -
Chip Chasin change of district boundary and use
classification from: R-4-X Suburban, Residential_;District, as
adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO R-3 Limited Multiple
Family Residence District. The following parcel of real property
as submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith:
Located on approximately 5.00 acres bounded by'Slater Ave.
on the north, and 660 ft west of Beach Blvd., and legally described
as E 2 of the W 2 of the S 2 of the SE 4 of the NE 4 of Section
26-5-11 SBB & M.
The hearing was opened to the public.
C. G. White, 7741 E. Slater Ave., H. B., addressed the Commission,
and stated that he was in favor of the proposed change of zone.
There being no further comment, the
hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 187
A Resolution of the City Plannin;
Commission Making Recommendation of
Approval of Zone Case No 187'to the
City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND SECONDED
BY STANG TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 187, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
FINDING OF FACT:
IRE
247
Page #10
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
There is an approved multiple subdivision within the proposed
district boundary.
The area had been proposed for multiple residents on the Mastex
Plan of Land Use.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None,
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3815 - REVISED
Number of Lots: 135 Subdivider: 1aerbco Construction Corp.
5410 Wilshire Blvd.
Total Acreage: 30.0 Suite 512
Los Angeles 36, Calif.
Engineer: Millet, King &- Assoc.
1518 14. Commonwealth
Fullerton, Calif.
Located east of Bolsa Ctiica Road
and north of Sugar Ave., and legally described as the south
30 acres of the W z of the NW 4 of Section '16-5-11.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Jeff Millet, Engineer of Millet, King & Assoc., addressed the
Commission, and pointed out that the revision was suggested
by the Federal*Housing Administration so that all of the houses
along -Sugar Ave. would be fronting on Sugar Ave. rather than
fronting, siding and backing on Sugar Ave.
The Commission agreed that it would
make a more orderly development.
There being no.further comment, the
hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND
SECONDED BY DOUTT TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3815 -
-10-
18
0
Page rl1
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
REVISED WITH CONDITIONS STIPULATED ON THE MAP AND WORDS TO BE
REWORDED AND NOTES TO BE ADDED. -
Notes to be reworded.
8. Sub -surface water rights to be deeded to the City of Huntington
Beach.
Notes to be-added.-
13. Said property to participate in the special drainage
assessment district now being formed by said City.
14. All dwellings on lots abutting a City easement -shall be
set back 5' from the edge of the easement.
15. Retaining walls shall be required where there is a difference
in elevation of 2' between adjoining lots or lots abutting
City right-of-way.
ROLL • CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4138
Number of Lots: 152 Subdivider: Fred M. Nishio
Agent: Bill Asawa
925 S. Beach Blvd,
Total Acreage: •3.1.2 Anaheim, Calif.
Engineer: Millet, Kin', & Assoc.
1518 W. Commonwealth
Fullerton, Calif.
• Located north of Smeltzer Ave. and
west of Golden West St;, and legally described as portion of
the SE 4 of the SE 4 of Section 15-5-11 SBB & M.
The hearing was opened to the public.
Jeff Millet, Engineer of Millet, King & Assoc., addressed the
Commission, and explained the layout of the subdivision, the
school site location, and the proposed commercial on the NW
corner of Edinger Ave. and Golden West Street.
-11-
249
Page #12
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
hearing was closed.
There being no further comment the
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0'4138
WITH CONDITIONS STIPULATED ON THE MAP AND NOTES TO BE
REWORDED.
Notes to be reworded.
8. Sub -surface water rights to be deeded to the City of
Huntington Beach.
9. Right-of-ways for street widening on parcels labeled
"Not a part of Subdivision" to be deeded to said City
and fully improved.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEAPING: FENCING' REQUIREMENTS OF SWIMMING POOLS
The hearing was opened to the audience,
there being no comment the hearing was closed. The Commission
discussed the need for more stringent requirements because
as the code stands now there exists a safety hazard.
There being no further comment, the
hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 1052 A Resolution of the City Plannin3
Commission Making Recommendation of
Approval of Fencing Requirements of
Swimming Pools to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS*MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED
BY LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 1052 BASED ON THE FOLL014ING
FINDING OF,FACT:
That the change would lead to better protection, and preserve
the health, safety and welfare of the general public.
-12-
Page #13
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stangf Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. - (Refer to page #12 (a) for corrections)
PUBLIC HEARING: CHANGE OF DESIGNATION OF STREETS AND AVENUES.
The hearing was opened to the audience. Fire Chief
Higgins, addressed the Commission and stated that he was in favor
of the change because it would enable the Fire Department to .
determine locations, within the City, much faster and more
efficiently.
There being no further comment, the hearing
was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 1054 A Resolution of the City Planning Commis-
sion Makin- Recommendation -of Approval
of Change of Desi-nation of Streets and
Avenues to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS.MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED
BY LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 1054, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING
FINDING OF FACT:
It would enable both governmental agencies and to the general
public to better orient themselves within our City limits.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman
Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
USES PERMITTED IN A-1-X
Continued
Commissioners Worthy, Doutt, and'Presson
-13-
251
Page #14
Minutes - H. B. Planning Cormission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
reported that after rezoning the use they felt that it was
more of a commercial use than an agricultural use.
There being no further comment, the
hearing was closed.
• A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD BE REQUIRED
TO APPLY FOR A VARIANCE BECAUSE THE COMMISSION FELT THAT
IT WAS A COTIMERCIAL USE.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Letson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman,
Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
There being no further business,
the meeting adjourned.
Itichard A. Harlow,
Actin; Secretary
-14-
aZ-x-_=tZa-, .
Robert ,Baz_ J
il,
Chairman