HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-06-062,64.
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COM1ISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall
• Huntin;ton Beach, California
Tuesday, June 6th, 1961
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Kaufman, Stang -
Chairman Bazil.-
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Letson.
MINUTES: On motion by Presson and seconded by
Stang, the Minutes of the Huntin ton -
Beach Planning Commission of May 16th, 1961, as transcribed
and mailed by the Secretary were accepted as mailed. `
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION To allow the Division of Land into
DIVISION OF LAND: DV #150
(Continued) two individual parcels as follows:
Applicant - Edward W. Tuck
Beginning; at the SW corner of the
NW :; of Section 1, T,6,S., R,11,11., SBB & i1, thence north 822,00 ft.
to the point of beginnin3; thence east 442 ft. to a point; thence
north 50 ft; thence west 442 ft.; thence south 50 ft. to the
point of beginning. DIVISION I: The west 221 ft. of the above
described property. DIVISION II: The east 221 ft. of the above
described property.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mr. George Tuck, addressed the Commission, and
stated that it ivould be_possible to amend the division boundries
to provide both lots with 221 ft. in depth.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed. Commission discussion followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO RECOMLIEND APPROVAL OF DV ;r150 TO THE CITY
COUNCIL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Curbs and butters: The installation of curbs and gutters shall
be assured by the posting of a $100.00
surety or cash bond (or Bank Guarantee)
I
0
265
Page_#12.. (a)
Minutes— H-. B-.Planning Commission
Tuesday, May 2nd, 1961
C O R R E C T I O N
FENCING REQUIREMENTS OF SWIMMING POOLS:
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED BY
LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 1052 AMENDING ARTICLE 814
SECTION 8141.TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
SWIMMING POOLS. FENCING: Every person in possession of
land witFln a Ci y, a ther as owner, purchaser under
contact, lessee, tenant or licensee, upon which is
situated a swimming pool, shall at all times maintain
on the lot or peemises upon which wkizk such pool is
located and completely surrounding such pool, lot or
premises, a fence or other solid structure not less than
six feet in height with no opening therein (other.than
doors or gates) larger than two inches square with a
smooth exterior surface. -All gates or doors opening_through
such enclosure shall be kept securely closed at all times
when not in actual use and shall be equipped with a self -
closing and self -latching -device designed to keep and
capable of keeping such door or gate securely closed at
all times when not in actual use; provided, however,
that the door of any dwelling occupied by human beings
and forming any part of the enclosure hereinabove re-
quired need not be so closed or so equipped.
L
BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDING OF FACTI
That the change would lead to better protection,
and preserve the health, safety and welfare of
the general public.
266
267
Pa-e r2
Minutes - H. B. Plannins Commission
Tuesday, June d, 1961
with the City Engineer on the basis of
$2.00 per runninj foot. The surety or
cash bond (or -Bank Guarantee) shall
be redeemed if the applicant constructs
• curbs and -utters along the frontage of
his lot according to City Engineer
Standards within the specified period.
The surety or cash bond (or Bank Guarantee)
shall be forfeited and the City Engineer
shall order the required construction
accomplished at no additional e:-,penses
to the applicant, in the event the
curbs and -utters are not constructed
within 120 days after the City En-ineer
has officially notified the applicant
of established grades and elevations.
This condition, shall become null and void '
in the event the City Engineer has not
provided established -rades and -elevations
within 24 montlls of approval,
Easement: A 10 ft. easement shall be provided alon-
the N'ly boundary of Division I, to
provide access to Division 11.
Lot Size: The lot size in both Division I and
Division II shall be 50 221 ft.
POLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: ^rresson, Doutt, Worthy, Stan-, Kaufman, Chairman Dazil.
.NOES : None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP #129 To allow the erection of a subdivi-
Applicant -
Columbia Outdoor Advert. Co. sion directional sisn 10' x. 40'
in the A-1-Y General Agricultural District. Located on the
east side of Beach Blvd. and approximately 400 ft. south of
Atlanta Ave. and legally described as the 430 ft. south of the
North line of the NG] 4 of the \W 4 of the NW 4 of Section
13-5-11, and 108 ft. east of the West line of the 4 of the NW
of the fin•] 4 of Section 13-6-11.
The hearin- was opened to the
audience, there bein- mt no comen, the hearin- was closed.
Commission discussion was held. It was noted that because there
were no signs erected within 300 ft. either to the north or the
-2-
Page ,r3
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6th, 1961
south of the proposed sign, the -ranting of Use Permit 1129
with the standard conditions, would be in accord.
A PIOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND SECONDED
BY DOUTT TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 129 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. -There shall be posted a $ 250.00 performance bond guarantee-
ing removal upon expiration of Use Permit NQ. 129.
2. Use Permit. -shall expire one year from date ;ranted.
3. The subdivisional directional sion shall be removed by the
'applicant upon expiration of Use Permit;#129-the penalty for
failure to do so shall be the forfeiture of the performance
bond. The City shall retain the right for entry and removal
of sign upon expiration of Use Permit No. 129.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman Bazi1.
NOES: None.-
ABSENT:'Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV ;r295 To allow the construction of a sub -
Applicant -
Tide ;dater Oil Co. division directional sion *10' -x 30'
in the A-1-Y General Agricultural District. Located at the
NE corner of Adams St. and Brookhurst St., and legally described
as 65 ft. north of the south Line of the SW - of SW 4 of SW 4
of Section 5-6-10 SBB & M., and the 65 ft. east of the west line
of the SW 4 of SW 4 of SW 4 of Section 5-6-10 SBB & M.
The Secretary read a letter submitted
by the applicant. The heating was opened to the public.' Pat
Carter, agent for the Carter Si-n Co., addressed the Coin_nission
and stated that he will be -lad to answer any questions. After
discussion it was determined by the Commission that the granting;
of UV #295 with the standard conditions, would be in order since
there are no sins located in any direction within 300 ft. of
the proposed sion.
-3-
269
Pa-e jr4
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
the hearinZ was closed.
There bein- no further comment
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON A"ID
SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE UV #295 WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. There shall be posted a $ 250.00 performance bond guarantee-
ing removal upon expiration of Use Variance.
2. Use Variance shall expire one year from date -ranted.
3. The subdivisional directional sign shall be removed by
the applicant upon expiration of Use Variance - the penalty
for failure to do so shall be the forfeiture -of the per-
formance bond. The City shall retain the right for entry
and removal of si-n upon expiration of Use Variance.
4. The si-n shall be set back 5' from the future right-of-way
line.
5. Any sign located at any street intersection shall have a
minimum clearance of 15' from the bottom of the sign to
the finish grade of the lot_.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stan-, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION To allow the encroachment of 15 ft.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #296
Applicant - into the required 20 ft. rear yard
Warren D. Weaver '
setback in the R-1 Sin,;1e family
Residence District. Located 7831 Rhine Dr., Huntington Beach,
and legally described as Lot 30, Tract 3622.
The hearing was opened to the
.4
audience,, there bein- no comment the hearing was closed.
Jack Cleveland, Director of the
Buildin- and Safety Departments, addressed the Commission
and pointed out that the request was one that both he and
the Fire Chief felt was reasonable as long as the patio
would not be attached to the main dwelling in any manner
other than that indicated on the plot plan.
-4-
270
Page ;r5
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
A r1OTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED
BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #296 WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. That the minimum side yard be maintained.
2. That the proposed structure shall not be permanently enclosed.
POLL CALL VOTE: '
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE 110TION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV 7#'297
Applicant -
Ben White
To allow two carports 9'6" x 201 in
deviation to the required 10' x 201.
To allow the encroachment of 3 ft. into the required 10 ft.
rear yard setback and to deviatd from the required 4 ft. side
yard setback by constructing the dwelling up to 2 ft. on the
last property line and to build on the property line on the west
side. Located at 208 Geneva St., Huntin0ton Beach; and legally
described as Lots 17 and 18, Block 602, Vista Del Mar Tract,
in the R-2 Two Family Residence District.
The Secretary read a letter submitted
by Eugene V. Emery and Mary L. Emery, adjoining property owners
to the applicant, protesting granting of the proposed variance.
Mrs. Julia Jones, 212' Geneva St., H. B., addressed the Commission,
and pointed out the'problem that exists at the present time
with Mr. White because of the structures that are now existing
on his rot, and if the variance was granted it would only
devaluate the neighborhood.
Mr. Charles Hollingsworth, 218 Geneva St.,
H. B., addressed the Commission, and stated that he felt if the
variance was -granted it would devaluate the surrounding property
and thought that if the dwellings in the surrounding, areas
- -5-
271
Palle If6
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
were constructed to conform to the code there was no reason
why the applicants should not. He also pointed out that the
main reason the variance was requested was because the parade
had been illegally converted to a &.ellin- and attached to the
house and by doing this, there was a violation of the setback
requirements and garage requirements.
There bein- no further comment the
hearing was closed. The Secretary informed the CioiTnission
that the applicant, i•.r. White, was ill and requested a contin-
uance of the hearing to the ne::t regular meeting of June 20th,
1961.
A NOTION 'HAS MADE BY STANG It'I TD SECONDED
BY PRESSON TO CONTINUE THE HEARD,G TO THE NEnT REGULAR 1'�17ETINC
OF JUNE 20TH, 1961.
POLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, 1-7orthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman Baz il.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE INIOTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION CONCERNING INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
The Chairman Addressed Mr. Wm. Gallienne,
Secretary Mana-er of the Chamber of Commerce, and asked if
there was anything he cared to present to the Commission.
Mr. Gallienne addressed the Commission
and brought up the problems concerning Industrial property.
An example of this was the case where the Ocean View School -
District has started proceedings to acquire a 15 acre school
site at the SE corner of Talbert Ave. and the P. E. P. R.
A portion of this site being within the boundary of a proposed
25 acre industrial development. He then asked the Commission
for full cooperation, concerninJ the protection of Industrial
property.
-6-
272
Page #7
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
Howard Stevens, Chairman of the
Industrial Committee, for the Chamber of Commerce, stated to the
Commission, that the committee was*in the process of asking all
property owners within industrial districts if their property
was available in order to determine the amount of Industrial
Zoned Property that could be used for industrial development,
and on the basis of this report all agencies concerned could
better analyze the situation and property could be zoned accord-
ingly.
Mr. H. E. Freeman,representative
of the S. P. R. R., statedthat he would like to go on record
as being in favor of the development of industries along the
railroad and requested the Planning Commission to do all that
is possible to protect the industrial property from uses other
than industrial. He also stated that many of*the subdivisions
that are constructin;; homes along the railroad tract are mis
leading the public by telling them that the railroad will not
be in operation in a short time.
Chairman Bazil pointed'out that it
was the Commission's intent to rezone the parts of land which
is under the Orange County Code, and by doing this, they would
do everyth ing'possible to retain the property that is presently
zoned for manufacturing in an industrial district, provided
that a hardship is not imposed or that it will not be detrimental
to the property that has already developed residentially.
USE VARIANCE: UV #298 To allow the continuance of colturing
Applicant -
James Fant tubifex worms and brine shrimp in
the A-1 General Agricultural District. Located south of Glencoe
St. and'west of beach Blvd., and legally described as Lot 10,
Block B, Tract 522, except the east 40 ft. thereof.
-7-
273
Page #8
Minutes - H. B. Planning -Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961 '
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Mrs. Juanita Gibbins, 7902 Glencoe St., Huntington Beach,
addressed the Commission, and stated that she was under the
impression that the Boulevard Gardens Tract was,zoned for
residential use rather than A-1-X. The Secretary informed
Mrs. Gibbins that the area was zoned residential.prior to
the referendum action which defeated the overall zoning of
the city, causing it to revert back to its original zone.
Mrs. Gibbins than told the -Commission,
,that she would like to goon record as being opposed tQ the
proposed variance because of it being a commercial use and
because it tends to attract flies and mosquitoes.
Richard LaRue, 17081 Beach Blvd.,
_addressed the Commission, and stated that he also was opposed
to any commercial use in an established residential district
and pointed out to the Commission that Glencoe Street was to
be an entrance to the proposed Alco Pacific subdivision and
that he felt that this should also be considered before the
Commission comes .to any decision..
Mr. Patrick D. Fant,, brother of the
applicant, addressed the Commission, and stated that he sold
the lot to his brother and was under the impression that
this use was permitted in the A-1-X zone, and a use variance .
would not be necessary.
There being no further comment the
hearing was closed. Commissioners Worthy, Doutt, and Presson
reported that when they reviewed the property, they felt
that it was of a commercial nature. After a discussion,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUF1'AN AND
SECONDED BY DOUTT TO RECOI'MND DENIAL OF USE VARIANCE UV #298
BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT.
IM
274.
Page #9
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission '
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
1. The use is of a commercial nature and it is not compatable
with the established.residences in the -area. .
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman,•Chairman Bazil.
NOES:' None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #299 To allow a real estate office to be
Applicant -
Dolores J. Watkins located in the R-4-X Suburban Residential
District. Located east of Beach Blvd. and south of Garfield St.,
and Legally described as the W - of the \eta 4 of* the NW 4 of Section
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Howard Kaveliaham, a partner in the proposed real estate office,
stated that the office was already existing due to a prior use_
variance approved for an office within a wrecking yard. He'also
requested permission to construct two signs 10 ft. in --diameter
to be located within the boundary of the existing fence.
There being, no further comment the
hearing was closed._
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PRESSON AND
SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE UV #299 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The sign shall be located within the boundary of the existing
fence.
2. Use Variance UV #299 shall expire on June 6, 1963.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stan-, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
275
N
Page #10
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission ,
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION To allow a Trailer to be placed in the
USE VARIANCE: UV #300
Applicant - M-1-X Light Industrial District for
John E. Forte
dwelling purposes. Located east of
Gothard St., and 120 ft. north of :darner Ave., further legal
information is on file in the Planning Department Office.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Mr. John E. Forte, applicant, addressed the Commission, and
stated that his reason for requesting the variance was because
the Drive -In Theatre is not opened during the day -light hours
when deliveries would be normally made, and that he would
lil:e,.to employ a person 24 hours a day to receive the deliveries,
and also protect the property from vandalism and robberies.
Mr. R. B. Call, 17172 Palm Street,
Huntington Beach, addressed the Commaission, and expressed his
opinion as -to the grantin of the proposed variance was.reason-
able.
There being no further comment the
hearing cWas closed.
Chairman Bazil pointed out to Mr.
Forte, that the City has an ordinance strictly prohibir_in,-
any trailers to be lived in on any property, other than
trailer parks, and asked if it would be possible to construct
a small house and office to be used by the manager, which
would be permitted in the 1.1-1-X District. Mr. Forte was in
agreement. There being no justification to approve UV 1300,
A MOTION? 14AS Mj%DE BY 14ORTHY AND
SECONDED BY DOUTT TO DENY UV 7'1'300.
ROLL CALL,VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Wgrthy, Stang, Kaufma�i, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
-10-
276
Page #11
Minutes - H. B. Planninb Commission -
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4235
Number of Lots: 67 Developer: Practical Builders, Inc.
13840 Beach Blvd..
• Westminster, California
Total Acreage: -•18.5 Engineer: Millet, King & Assoc.
1518 W. Commonwealth
Fullerton, California
• -Located north of darner Ave., and west
of Newland St. and legally described as portion of the E 2 of -
the SE 4 of the SW 4 of Section 24-5-11 SBB & M.
The -hearing was opened to the audience,
there being no comment the hearing was -closed.
The Secretary -informed the Commission
that all of the standard conditions are listed on the map and
there are no conditions to be added.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED
BY PRESSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT 11AP NO 4235 WITH CONDITIONS
LISTED ON THE D(AP. .
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stan-, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: -None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 172 CHANGE OF ZONE relative -to:
proposed.
Applicant -
Chip Chasin - change of district boundary and use
classification from: M-1-X Lidht Manufacturing District as adopted
by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO R-3 Limited Multiple Family
Residence District. The following parcels of real property
as submitted on the applicant's petition are described herewith:
Located on approximately 5 acres bounded by Slater Ave. on the
south, and 1320 ft. west of Beach -Blvd., and lebally•described
as the E 2 of the SE 4 of the SW 4 of the NE 4 of Section 26-5-11.
-11--
277
Page #12
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
The hearing was opened to the public,
Mr. R. B. Call, 17172 Palm Street, Huntington Beach, addressed .
the Commission and stated that he would like to see all property
zoned for manufacturing use remain in an industrial zone.
The Chairman pointed -put to_Mr.•Call
.that under the present zoning the property can be subdivided
and the request under consideration for rezoning is within an
approved multiple subdivision;- the changing of the 11-1-X
zoning to an R-3 District would protect those residents of the
subdivision from any us --..of an industrial nature that could
locate within the tract boundary.
Mr. Frank Merrell, owner of a dairy
expressed his desire to have the -area remain as an industrial
zoning, and asked what effect the changing would have on his prop-
erty. The Chairman informed Mr. Merrell that there could
possibly be some complaints from the residents of the subdivision
if there was any odor, but the changing of the zone would not
have any effect on his property because the residents would. t
be permitted 'in either the M-1=X'or R-3 Zones.
There being no further comment the
hearing i4as closed.
RESOLUTION -NO 172 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Making Recommendation of
Approval of Zone Case No 172 to the
City Council.
A NOTION GAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 172 BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACTS:
1. There is an approved multiple subdivision within the proposed
district boundary.
2. There is an established Residential District'abuttin; the
property to the east.
3. Under the present zoning high density residential uses are
permitted.
-12-
278
Page #13
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
ROLL CALL 'DOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None. -
ABSENT: Leeson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS.ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 188 Continued CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed
Applicant -
Robert H. Grant change of district boundary and use
classification from: R-1 Single Family Residence District TO
C-4 Community Business District. The following parcels of real
property as submitted on the applicant's petition is described
herewith: Located on approximately. 2.55 acres at the southwest-.
corner of Bolsa Ave.•and Edwards St; and legally described as
that portion of the easterly 1,295.06 ft. of the Nil 4 of Section
15, T.5.S . , R.11.W. , SBB M. Further description on file at
the Planning Department Office.'The hearing was opened to the
audience. John Prins, representing the applicant, addressed.the
Commission and answered various:quebtions: - -,
There -being nosfurther.comment, the hearirib was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 188 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Making Recommendation of
Approval of Zone Case No 188 to the
City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PR SSON AND
SECONDED BY STANG TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 188 BASED ON THE FOLLOW-
ING FINDINGS OF FACTS:
1. The property lies adjacent to two Secondary Arterial Highways.
2. The commercial area will be needed to serve the new subdivisions
now under construction -in the area.
3. The commercial area falls within the percentage of land use.
in relation to residential area.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman.
NOES: , Chairman Bazil.
a
ABSENT: Leeson..
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
-13-
279
0
Page #14
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission ,
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
ZONE CASE NO 189 - Continued CHANGE OF ZONE relative to
Applicant -
Robert H. Grant proposed change of district boundary
and use classification from: R-1 Single Family Residence
District TO C-4 Community Business•District. The following
parcels of real property as submitted on the applicant's
petition is described herewith: Located on approximately 2.24
acres at the northwest corner of Edward St. and Sugar Ave., and
legally described as follows: That portion of the easterly
1,295.06 ft. of the NW 4 of Section 15, T.5.S., P..11.��l., SBB 1�1.
Further description on file at the Planning Department Office.
i The hearing was opened to the
't audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed.
Commission. discussion followed.
RESOLUTION NO 189 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Makin- Recommendation
of Approval of zone Case No 189
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND
,SECOZ113ED BY PRESSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION.NO 139 BASED ON THE
FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACTS:
1. The property lies adjacent to two Secondary,Arterial Highways.
2. The:.commercial area will be needed to serve the new sub-
divisions now under construction in the area.
3. The commercial area falls within the percentage of land
use in.relation to residential area.
POLL CALL VOTE:
• AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stang, Kaufman.
NOES: Chairman Bazil.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 191 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed
Applicant -
James McCarthy change of district boundary and use
classification from: R-5 Zone TO C-1 Neighborhood Commercial
District.
-14-
Page #15
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
Located north of Sugar Ave. and west of Golden West St., and
legally described as being a portion of the NE 4 of Section
15-5-11, SBB & M described as follows: Beginning at the SE
corner of the NE 4 of Section 15, said corner being the center-
line intersection of Goldenwest St. 60 ft. wide and Sugar Ave.
40 ft. wide, said corner being the true point of beginning.
Further legal on file in the Planning Department Office.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Jeff Millet, representing the applicant, addressed the Com-
mission and asked for continuance of the proposed Zone Case
to the next regular meeting of June 20th, 1961, as the applicant
could not be present at this hearing and the continuance will
give the applicant time to appear:
A MOTION'WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECOND4D
BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING
OF JUNE 20TH,.1961,
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson,. Doutt, Worthy,. Stang, 'Kaufman, Chairman`Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Let son.
THE MOTION CARRIED. ._
ZONE CASE NO 192 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed
Applicant .
George Buccola change of district boundary and use'
classification from: R-4-X Suburban Residential District
as adopted by Interim Ordinance.668 TO C-4 Commercial District.
The following parcel of real property as submitted on -the.
applicant's petition is described herewith: Located 126.87 ft.
west of Beach Blvd. and 660.10 ft. north of -Talbert Ave.
and legally described as Lot 18, Tract 3478 in Section"2615-11
SBB & M.-
• -15-
281
Page #16
Minutes - H. B. Plannino Commission
Tuesday, June 6, 1961
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Richard -LaRue, Coast Realty, addressed the Commission and
spoke in favor of the rezoning. There being no further
comment, the hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 192 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Making Recommendation of
Approval of Zone Case No 192. to the
City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY DOUTT AND SECONDED
BY PRESSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 192.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Presson, Doutt, Worthy, Stan-,, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Letson.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
DISCUSSION: PROPOSED ORDINANCE CHANGE TO ENABLE
THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO INCREASE THE
LOT'SIZES AS DEEMED NECESSARY.
The Secretary read the proposed Ordinance
change; After lengthy discussion held by the Commission,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED
BY PRESSON TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO ADVERTISE THE PROPOSED
ORDINANCE CHANGE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD JUNE 20TH,
1961. .
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION: PROPOSED REZONING ALONG LAKE STREET AND 17TH
STREET, NORTH OF MEMPHIS AVENUE, FROM THE
EXISTING M-2-0.
A discussion was held by the Planning
Commission, concerning the rezoning -of certain areas.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFTVhN AND SECONDED
BY STANG TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO ADVERTISE THE PROPOSED
CHANGES FOR PUBLIC HEARING
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION
I
• , BY K.AUF11AN AND SECONDED BY WORTHY,
THE MEETING ADJOURNED
Richard A. Harlow, Ro ert Bazil,
Acting Secretary -16- Chairman