Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-10-03400 I IINUTES Or THE:. �:UNTII`?GTON SLACH PL:�NNIIv'C COJ•U.JISSI0N Council Chambers, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Tuesday, October 3rd, 1961 COr24ISSI0NERS PRESENT: Kaufman, Worthy, Stang, Miller, Welch, Chairman Bazil. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Let son. MINUTES: On motion by Stan.- and seconded by Kaufman, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of September 19th, 1961, and September 26th2 1961, as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary were accept- ed as mailed. JD TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO -3 - CONTINUED Revised September 26th, 1961 Number of Lots: 461 Subdivider: Vanguard Construction Co. Total Acreage: 101.3± Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-Nelson, Inc. Located north of Adams Avenue, south of Yorktown Street, west of Bushard and east of Cannery Street, and legally described as bein- a proposed subdivision of a portion of the S11 4 of Section 6-6-10. The Secretary read the report of the Subdivision Committee recommending conditions for approval of the tract. Frank Richardson, of Voorheis-Trindle- Nelson, Inc., the subdividers agent addressed the Commission, and stated that he was not in agreement with condition #6 regarding the extension of the service road around the intersec- tion of Adams and Bushard. He stated that his thinking was if the intersection became conjested, people might -o around the conjested area by usino, the service road thus diverting traffic into the residential area. 410 Pape #2 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 It was the feeling of the Subdivision Committee'that the connection of the service road would provide better local traffic circulation within -the tract-. Senior Design Engineer, Bill Hart-e, h questioned the status of the park site and whether or not the subdivider would be dedicating and improving the adjoining streets. The Secretary pointed out that condition of,approval #7 would require the park site to be included as part of the tract thus requiring the improvement of the adjoin- ing streets. City En-ineer James Wheeler asked that the bridges carrying ,dams -Avenue and Yorktown Street across the flood control channel be widened by the subdivider. Frank Richardson, representing the subdivider, was opposed to the wideninS, stating that the brid-e is not connected in any way to the subdivision and should not be the responsibility of the subdivider. City Engineer stated that if the subdivider did not widen the bridge; it would be a burden upon the City. Frank Richardson pointed out the problems which the developer has been confronted with. It was noted that the developer had previous approval of the subdivision and was only asked for farther review by the Planning Commission because'of the re- location of the school site and other minor revisions. City Engineer Wheeler pointed out that the estimates for drainage assessments did not include funds for widening bridges. The Chairman stated that he felt the City would be confronted with the problem of constructing or widening -,-2-- 411 �I Page #3 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 bridges unless the drainage assessments were increased to cover that additional expense. • It was suggested that the cost be spread over the entire valley by means of an assessment. Mr. i-Jheeler stated that there was a possibility under the _ 1911 public improvement act or a per acre cost to the c. developer added to the enis, indrainage assessments. length. Commission discussion was held at A NOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY KAUF MAN TO APPROVE THE DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO 4350 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITI0NS: 1. The revised layout dated September 26th, 1961 shall be the approved map. 2. This approval -shall supercede the previous approval of the previous tentative map.. 3. A fire station site shall be reserved meeting with the approval of the Hire Chief. 4. The proposed park site shall be included as a numbered lot in the tract and shall be reserved for park purposes. 5. Tre pedestrian bridge across the flood control channel and the walkway at lot 179 shall be improved in a manner meeting with the approval of the City Engineer. 6. The service road along Adams Avenue shall be extended through lots 1 and 43 and connect to the service road along Bushard St. 7. Lot 359 or 1•61 shall be reserved as•a drainage pumping station site meeting with the approval of the City Engineer. 3. No portion of this tract shall be -recorded until such time as further approval by the Planning Commission is secured certifying that a solution has been found to the problem of a public health hazard due to irrigation of nearby farm lands with undisinfected•sewer effluent. 9. All applicable 'standard subdivision requirements -shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: .•7elch, Miller, t%Torthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman Dazil. NOES : None. ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. 412 Page #4 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 ZONE CASE NO 211 - CHANGE OF ZONE from: C-1-X Local Continued Initiated by Business District as adopted by Resolution of Intent interim Ordinance No 6683 TO C-1 .neighborhood Commercial District. Generally the property in- volved is located on both•sides of Beach Blvd., between.Newman Street and. a point 600 ft. north of Warner P_venue. The Secretary read the staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no cc::TMnent the hearin,- was closed. Commission discussion was held. RESOLUTION NO 211 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Making Recommendation of Approval of Zone Case No 211 to the ' City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY STANCY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 211. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Miller, KaufmanStang, Worthy, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 214 CHANGE' OF ZONE from: A-1-X General Applicant - Wilford G. Lewis Agricultural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 TO C-2 Community Business District_or C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions. Approximately 16 acres Located at the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Goldenwest Street and legally described as being the Nlly 800 ft. of the Elly 382 ft. of the Nta 4 of Section 22, T.5.S., R.11.W., SBB & M, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, City. of Huntington Beach. ' The Secretary read the staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment, it was closed. -4- 413 Page #5 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission - Tuesday, October 3, 1961 RESOLUTION NO'214 Commission discussion followed. A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Making Recommendation of Approval of Zone Case No 214 to the City Council. A NOTION WAS MADE BY KaUFI•LyN AND SECO.NTDED BY NORTHY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NV 214, BASED ON' THE FOLLOWING FINDING OF FACTS: 1. The property is located at the intersection of two primary arterial highways. 2., The property is located at the one mile intersection which is the more logical location for a business zone. POLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Miller, Stan-, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 215 CHANGE OF ZONE from: A-1-Y General Applicant - Pacific Sands Agricultural District-, as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 672 TO R-1 Single Family Residence District and C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. Located at the northeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Atlanta Avenue. •The Secretary read the staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience. City Engineer James Wheeler, pointed out the problems of draining the quarter section. He stated that the development of a shopping center was not likely until the Flood Control Channel is developed. There being no further comment, the hearinS was closed. Commission discussion was held. RESOLUTION NO 215 A Resolution of the -City Planning Commission Making Recommendation of • Approval of Zone Case No 215 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 215, BASED ON THE FOLLCWING FINDING OF FACTS: -5- 414 Page #6 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 1. Under the present zoning the property can be subdivided and dwellings constructed. 2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that are not compatible with single family residences within the tract and that the area -proposed to be changed to C-1 does meet the criteria for a commercial development for the following specified reasons: 1. The property is located at the intersection of a primary arterial highway and a major arterial highway. 2. The property is located -at the one mile intersection which is the more logical location for a business zone. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Miller, Stan,-, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman, Bazil•. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION: UV #328 To allow construction'of a 6 ft. Applicant - W. C. Bass block wall on the exterior side yard of a reverse corner lot in the R-1=Single Family Residence' District. Located at the SE corner of Oxford Drive and Yorkshire Lane and legally described as Lot 54, Tract 3889, known as Golden West Homes. The Secretary read a letter.of protest submitted by -Mr. & Mrs. D. Dodson. The staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Fred Hobart, 8072 E 23rd Street, Westminster, addressed the Commission and stated that he was representing the applicant and was the contractor. He pointed out the reasons why the applicant wanted to construct the 6 ft. block wall. He stated that it would enlarge the rear yard area and same time provide privacy. • Mr. Bass, applicant, stated that the ordinance enables him to construct the fence a -reater distance if he set back 10 ft. from the property line. -o- 415 Page #7 Minutes - H. B. Plannin, Commission , Tuesday, October 3, 1961 There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion igas held at len-th. A iIUTION WAS ?,LADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY MILLET:, TO APPROVE UV 7-t"'328 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. No fence or wall over 42" in height shall be constructed in that portion of rear yard adjacent to the exterior side line ;within -a 15 f t . x 15 ,f t . right triangle measures: along the rear and exterior side lot lines. 2. No fence, wall or shrub over 4211 in height shall be allowed in the e:-t erior side yard closer than .; 0 f t . to the front property line. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Welch, Jrthy, Stang, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil. NOE S : None. ABSENT Letson. THE :'iJTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION: To allow the construction of single family UV #329 Applicant - dwelling in the A-1 General Agricultural Cleo West District. Located at the SE corner of Glencoe Street and Silver Street, and legally described as Lot 1, Block "B" of Tract 522. The Secretary read the staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience. Lrs. Bates, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that she did not object to the condition that the two dwellings not be separated in o ner- ship. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. A TiOTIvN WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTIIY TO APPROVE UV ir -"329 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. That the Lot No 1, Block "B", Tract No 522 be not divided into two separate cwnerships. POLL CALL VOTE: EYES: Welch, Miller, Stan;, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. 90 416 Page #8 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 ABSENT: Letson, THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION: To allow construction of a 6 ft. UV #330 Applicant - Ulocl: wall within the exterior Louis G. Sciana _ side yard on a corner lot in the R-1 Sinc-le Family Residence District. Located at the SE corner of Canterbury Drive and Victoria Lane and le -ally described as Lot 67, Tract 3890, known as Golden W.Pst Homes. The staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment it was closed. Commission discussion followed. A PIOTION WAS AIkDE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY PULLER TO APPROVE UV #330 WITHOUT CONDITIONS. ROLL CALL VOT E : AYES: Welch, Miller, Stang, Worthy, I:aufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION: To allow the erection of double face UV #331 Applicant - 15 ft. x 60 ft. subdivision directional Sunbeam Homes _ s.i;n within a proposed subdivision in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located approi imately 500 ft. west of Edwards Street and north of Bolsa Avenue, and legally described as being 100 ft. north of the south line of the SE 4 of the SE 4 of the SW 4 of Section 10-5-11, and 500 ft. west of the east line of the SE 4 of the SE " of the S14 4 of Section 10-5-11. The Secretary read the staff report The hearing was opened to the audience, there being no comment the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. -8- 417 Page 49 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY -AND SECONDED BY WELCH TO APFftCVE UV #331 WITH THE FOLLCHING CC'NDITIONS : 1. There shall be posted a $250.00 performance bond c;uarantee- ing remcval upon expiration of -Use Variance. 2. Use Variance shall -expire one year from date -ranted. 3. The subdivision.- directional si-n shall be removed by the applicant upon expiration of Use Variance - 331 the penalty for failure to do so shall be the forfeiture of the performance bond. The City shall retain the right for entry and removal of sior, upon expiration'of Use Variance. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Piiller, Stan-, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil . NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST FOR SCHOOL SITE APPROVAL OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE NO 15 - REVISED Located north of Heil Avenue and approximately 290 ft. west of Edwards Street. PARCEL A: N 7.64 acre of the N4 4, SE 4, NW 4 of Section 22-5-11. PARCEL B: S 1.93 acre of the SW 4, NE 4, N14 4 of Section 22-5-11. PARCEL C: SW 1.10 acre of the SE 4, NE i;, `TU 4 of Section 22-5-11. PARCEL D: NU 4.29 acre of NE 4, • SE 4, ITl 4 of Section 22-5-11. The above described property contains 14.96 acre. The Secretary read letter submitted by the Ocean View"'School District, requesting approval of the proposed school site ;r 15 . Commission discussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WELCH AND SECONDED BY STANG TO APPROVE SCHOOL SITE #15. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Miller, Stang, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ME Page #10 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission , Tuesday, October 3, 1961 ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED, SITE NO 24: Located north of Warner Avenue and 660 ft. west of Algonquin Street. SITE NO 33: Located 330 ft. south of Smeltzer' Avenue and 1650 ft. west of Algonquin Street (extended). , The Secretary read letters submitted by the Ocean View School District and Huntington Harbour Corp. requesting that the Planning Commission postpone a hearing on the school sites for -another two weeks, since more time is needed to consider their location. A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF OCE_yN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE NEXT PLANNING• COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 17TH, 1961. POLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Miller, Stan-, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. COMMUNICATION - Letter was submitted by Pacific Sands PACIFIC SANDS .and read by the Secretary, requesting that note #15 showing a'5 ft. concrete block wall along the proposed storm drain channel be changed to provide a 5 ft. . chain link fence in lieu of the block wall along the channel within the Tract No 3595. ' Commission discussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY I:AUFMAN AND SECONDED'BY WORTHY TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF THE. APPLICANT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Miller, Stan;, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None: ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. -10- 41 Page #11 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 ' COMMUNICATION BAY READY MI., INC. The Secretary read a letter submitted by Bay Ready Mix, Inc., requesting an extension of thirty days, concerning; Zone,Case No 207. A MOOTION WAS MADE BY, STANG AND SECONDED BY WELCH TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF T?i: APFLICA:r'T AND CONTINUE THE HEARING OF ZONE CASE NO 207-TO NOVE-MBER 7TH, 1961. ROLL CALL VOTE: `YES: Welch, Miller, Stang, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT:,Letson. ` .THE MOTION CARRIED. COMMUNICATION - ISLAND STUDY COMMITTEE The Secretary read letter submitted by the Island Studv Committee, Sunset Beach, California, opposing any bridge in.the Huntington Harbour development that would obstruct navigation from any existing waterfront property. After a discussion, A MOTION WAS MADE BY STANG AND SECONDED BY WORTHY, THE LETTER WAS RECEIVED AND ORDERED FILED. POLL CALL VOTE: , AYES: Welch, Miller, Stan„ Worthy, I:aufman, Chairman Bazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. COMMISSION BY-LAWS After reviewing the By -Laws the Planning Commission found no objections to the proposed draft. The Secretary pointed out the two additions' which should be'included and the Commission was in agreement. A MOTION WAS MADE BY kAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY WELCH TO ADOPT THE BY-LAWS AS STATED. -11- 420 Page #l2 - Minutes - H. B. Planning -Commission ' Tuesday, October 3,.1961' Section 1-. -Title. Pursuant to Article 911 of the Huntinuton Beach Ordinance Code the official title of this Commission shall be "Planning Commission of the City of Huntington -Beach" and -may also -be referred to as Huntington Beach Planning Commission, City Planning Commission or Planning Commission. Section 2. Officers. The officers of this Commission shall be a Chairman and Vice Chairman who shall be elected by majority vote of the Commission and shall hold office for a period of one year and until their successors are elected. To fill a vacancy in the unexpired term of Chairman or Vice Chairman, a member of the Commission shall be elected for such unexpired term. An election of officers shall be held at the last meeting of December of each year and.the elected Chairman and Vice Chairman shall assume office at the first meeting of January of each year. No person shall occupy the office of Chairman or Vice Chairman for more than two consecutive terms. In addition there shall be a Secretary of the Commission which office shall be incumbent upon the Director of the Planning Department. Section 3. Duties of Chairman and Vice Chairman. The Chairman.shall preside at the meetings of the Commission and in case of his absence or inability to act, the Vice Chairman shall act, and in the absence of both the Chairman and Vice Chairman, the Commission shall appoint a Chairman pro tempore who shall serve only until such time as the Chairman or Vice Chairman returns and is able to act, and -who for such period shall have all the powers and duties of the Chairman or Vice Chairman. The Chairman shall have the power to make or second any motion and to present and discuss any matters notwithstanding the fact.that he is the presidin3 officer of the Commission. .Section 4. Duties of the -Secretary. It shall be the duty of the Secretary. to keep. a • full an record of all proceedings of the Commission, shall -schedule matters for hearing and consideration by the Commission, shall notify members of meetings- and perform such other duties required, by statute, law or the Commission.- In. case of the absence of the Secretary, a Deputy Secretary, appointed by._tre-;Secretary, shall act, and in the absence. -of both the Secretary and Deputy Secretary, then the Chairman shall appoint a Secretary pro tempore who shall serve only until such time as the Secretary or Deputy Secretary returns and is able to act, and who -for such period shall have all the powers and duties of the Secretary. Section 5. Advisors. The.Chairman may, with consent of the Commission, request the attendance at --Planning Commission -12- 421 Pade #13 Minutes -- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 meetings of any off icer'or employee of the City to assist the Commission in its deliberations in an advisory capacity; Section 6, Meetins All meetings of the Commission shall be open and public. Reular meetings shall be held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at the hour of 7:30 o'clock P.M. in the Ciouncil Chamber of the City Hall. A regular meeting may be adjourned to a date certain which shall be specified in the order of adjournment and when so adjourned, shall be a re-ular meeting for all purposes. Such adjourned meeting may likewise be adjourned and when so adjourned, shall be a regular meeting for_all purposes. In the event a regular meetin date falls on a legal holiday such meeting date shall be deemed to be the day followin- such holiday. In the event a re- gular meeting date follows the date of a regular City Council meeting and such Council meeting falls on a•legal holiday thereby necessitating such Council meeting to be postponed to the day follow - in k such holiday, the regular Commission meetin- date shall be deemed to be the day following such postponed Council meeting. Special Meetings may be called by the Chairman or, in his absence, by the Vice Chairman by �.,ritten notice delivered personally to each member at least three hours before the specified time of the proposed meeting. At any Special Meeting the power of the Commission to transact business shall be limited to the matters specified in such written notice., Section 7. Attendance, Re ulcer attendance at meetings of the Planning Commission is required of all members to enable the Commission' -"to discharge the duties imposed upon it by lay-.. A member absent from 4 consecutive regular meetings, without securing the consent of the Chairman, shall be deemed•to have resi-ned from the Commission. Upon majority vote of the Commission the Secretary sha11_,notify the City Council of such resignation and request in the name of the Commission appointment of a new member to fill the unexpired term of the member resigning. Section•8,• Quorum, At any meeting of the Planning Commission, a majority of said Commission shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and a majority of the voting; members present shall decide. In the event there is no quorum at a Commission meeting, the Secretary shall adjourn such meeting, or shall adjourn to a_ date certain_. Section 9. Order of Business. The order of business for regular or special meetin-s shall be: -13- 422 Page #14 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 . 1. Call to order by the Chairman. Z. Consideration of matters onthe agenda i• prepared by the Secretary. 3. Any other business which may properly come before the Commission. Section 10. Parliamentary Procedure. The Parliamentary Pules laid down in "Roberts :rules of Order" shall in -eneral -overn the proceedin;;s of this Commission, but the Chairman shall decide all questions of order, subject appeal to the Commission, and all.appeals shall be decided by a majority of the members present. The Chairman shall vote on all matters coming before the Commission whether there is a tie vote or not.' No member may vote.ar_ a meeting by proxy, or by any method other than being personally present and casting his vote.. Every member present shall give his vote on all questions brought to a vote. Every member present who shall not have properly disqualified himself and*who shall remain silent and'fail to record a vocal vote on -any question brought to a vote, shall have his vote recorded'as an affirmative or aye vote. In'lieu of a vocal vote a member may vote upon.any motion or matter, including a roll call vote, 'by pressing a 'switch to cause a' green light to show for an affirmative vote or a red light to show for a negative vote, upon the vote being called for by the Chairman. The result of any vote registered by means of a lighting system shall be audibly announced by the Secretary and recorded in the minutes -as the vote of the Commission. Any member present who deems himself disqualified for any reason to vote upon any -question may so - declare himself as --disqualified and shall state his reasons for disqualification if called upon by a majority of -.the quorum present. Any such member who has so disqualified himself shall -have that fact shown in the minutes of the meeting and shall not be required to vote upon the question on which he has disqualified himself and his failure to vote shall be recorded as neither an aye.or nay note. ' Section 11. Changes in By -Laws.. A majority vote of all members entitled to vote shall,be required to amend these.by-laws. Copies of a proposed amendment shall be given to each member at a regular meeting or shall be mailed to each member at least 5 days prior to a meetin„ and may then be voted upon at the next regular meeting. .Section 12. Adoption; Approved and adopted as the By -Laws of the Planning Commission of the City of Huntingtbn Beach this 3rd day of October, 1961, and repealing the Pay- _ Laws adopted November 27th, 1939, as amended, by -14- 423 Page #15 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, October 3, 1961 the following roll call vote: AYES: Horthy, Welch, Miller, Stan-, Kaufman, Chairman Dazil. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. REVISION OF ARTICLE 911 TITLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -The Planning commission considered and after discussion recommended to the City Council the revision of Article 911 related to -the establishment of the City Plannin'; Commission to better clarify their duties. A MOTIOtd WAS MADE BY 1UkUF11AN AND SECONDED BY STANG TO RECOM,IMEND ADOPTION OF THE DEVISED ARTICLE 911 BY TIE CITY COUNCIL. POLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Miller, Stang, Worthy, Kaufman, Chairman Bazi1. NOES: None. ABSENT: Letson. THE MOTION CARRIED. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, UPON MOTION BY 1i.kUF11AN AND SECONDED BY STANG, THE MEETING ADJOURNED. Hek W. C. Warner, Robert Bazij--j Secretary. Chairman -15-