Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-02-06M MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, City Hall Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6th, 1962 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None, MINUTES: On motion by Worthy and seconded by Miller, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of January 16th and January 30th, , 1962, were accepted as transcribed and mailed -by the Secretary. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 4563 Number of Lots: 10 Subdivider: S. V. Hunsaker Total Acreage: 1.421 Engineer:_- Millet, King & Assoc. Located approximately 1320 ft south of Sugar Avenue and we6t of Goldenwest Street, and legally described as being a subdivision of Lot.142, Tract 4138. Subdivision Committee Report was read by the Secretary. Commission discussion was held. A.MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4563 UPON THE FOL- LOWING CONDITION:: , 1. All of the Standard Subdivision Requirements that are appli- cable shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang., NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4210 REVISED PORTION - Number of Lots: 62 Subdivider: R. H. Grant Total Acreage: 11.8 Engineer: Voorhei:s-Trindle- Nelson, Inc. 35 Page #2 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 Located at the northeast corner of Edinger Avenue and Edwards Street and legally described as being a proposed subdivision of a portion of the SW 4 of the SW 4 of Section 15-5-11. The Secretary read the report of the Subdivision Committee. Commission'discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4210, REVISED PORTION, UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:: 1•. All applicable conditions of approval of the previous Tenta- tive Map shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, L'etson*, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO. 224 - Continued Initiated by Resolution of Intent CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to proposed change of district boundaries and use classifications as follows: From M-1 Light Industrial District to C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions. Pro- perty on the south side of Edinger, approximately 1300 feet west of Beach Blvd. described as the N 2 NW 4 NE 4 of Section 23-5-11. From A-1-X General Agricultural Dis- trict as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 to C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions, property on the south side of Edinger Avenue and the north side of Aldrich Street described as Lots 14, 17 thru 20, 24 thru 30, 32 and 33, Tract 417. From A-1-X General Agricultural Dis- trict as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 to C-4 Highway Com- mefcial District with setback provisions, property located on the south side of Aldrich Street described as Lots 50 thru 59, Tract 417. 2 - 26 Page #3 - Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 From C-1 Neighborhood Business District to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions property located south of Edinger Avenue and west of Beach Blvd., described as Lots l thru 13, 34 and 35, Tract 417. From A-1-X General Agricul- tural District as adopted'by Interim Ordinance No. 668 to R-3 Limited Multiple Family District, property located on both sides of Stark Street and Holt Street and the north side of McDonald Street described as Lots 60 thru 69, 86 thru 105, 122 thru 141, Tract 417. From A-1-X General Agricul- tural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No. 668 to R-2 Two - Family Residence District, property located south of -McDonald St., north of Heil Avenue and 150 feet west of Beach Blvd.-, described as Lots 148 thru 157, Tract 417; Lots 1 thru 10, Block A, Tract 522; Lots 1 thru 10, 21 thru 30, Block B, Tract 522; Lots 1 thru 10, Block C, Tract 522. From A-1-X General Agricul- tural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions, property located west of Beach Blvd. and between Aldrich Street and Heil Avenue, described as Lots 36 thru 49, 70 thru 85, 106 thru 121, 142 thru 147, Tract 417; Lots 11 thru 15, Block A, Tract 522; Lots 11 thru 20, Block B, Tract 522; Lots 11 thru 14, Block C, Tract 522. A - Further notice is given that the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach in- tends to recommend that a 50 ft setback, measured from property line, be placed on Beach Blvd., extending from Edinger Avenue south to Heil Avenue, and that a 100 ft setback be placed along Edinger measured from the centerline of Edinger Avenue extending from Pacific Electric Railroad Right of Way east to Beach Blvd. The Secretary read a letter submitted by Henry N. Stoct, 107 Beach Blvd., Anaheim, California, - 3 - 37 Page #4 Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 stating that he was in favor of the proposed C-4 Highway Com- mercial because it would be beneficial to the whole area. Also a written communication was read by the Secretary submitted by Mrs. Effie Neiderhiser, stating that she was opposed to the C-4 Zone and that she would prefer that a C-2 Community Business District be granted since the property was purchased for a small business. The hearing was reopened to the audience. Mr. Bill Potts, 7932 Aldrich Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and opposed the letter submitteii by Mrs. Effie Neiderhiser, stating that the surrounding property owners wished that the C-4 Zone be approved. Mr. Nagle, 794Z Aldrich Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and also spoke in favor of the proposed C-4 Highway Commercial District. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed, Commission discussion was held.at length. RESOLUTION NO. 224 A Resolution of the City Planning Commis- sion Making Recommendation of Approval of Zone Case No. 224 to the City Council. X'MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 22.4 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 224 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIED REASONS: 1. The present use of much of the property is being used as it is proposed in the zone change. 2. The proposed change is necessary for the growth and pros- • perity of the area. 3. The proposal will provide protection against uses that would be incompatible with the present uses of the property. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. - 4 - 11 Page i�5 - - Minutes H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6,1962 ZONE CASE NO. 226 CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to Applicant - Gabriel & Gabriel proposed change of district boundary and use classifi- cation from: R-1 Single -Family Residence District to C-2.Com- munity Business District with setback provisions or C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions. The following par- cel of real property as submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith: Located at the southeast corner of Heil Avenue and Bolsa.Chica Street and legally described as -follows: Commencing from the NW corner of the NW 4of the NW 4 of the SW 4 of Section 21-5-11 in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica; thence running east 208.71 feet; thence south 208:71 feet; thence west 208.71 feet; thence north 208.71 feet to the point of beginning. by the Secretary. The Staff report was read The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed out that the northeast corner of the intersection is now zoned C-1. At the northwest corner is County area and is essentially vacant.. The southwest corner, also County area is occupied by a dairy for which a variance was recently granted for.the retail sales of dairy products. The Planning Director fur- ther pointed out that by virtue of existing uses and zoning, it would appear that the pattern has been set for commercial use. Commission discussion was - held at length. RESOLUTION NO. 226 A Resolution of the City -Planning Commission .Making Recommendation of Approval of Zone Case No. 226 to C-4 Zone to the -City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WELCH AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 226-RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 226 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOL- LOWING SPECIFIED REASON.:. - 5 - 39 Page #6 Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 1. The property is situated at an intersection where the re- maining three corners are zoned commercial or Have uses of a commercial nature, setting the pattern for the use of the subject property as commercial. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION To allow Division of Land into DIVISION OF LAND: DV #161 two separate parcels. Located APPLICANT - Lester R. Peterson 150 feet north of Yorktown St. and west of England Avenue and legally described as the south 100 feet of the north 150 feet of the east half of Lot 2505, East Side Villa Tract. DIVISION I: The south one-half of the above described property. DIVISION II: The north one- half of above described property. The staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed out that the request was to create two lots each to be 50 feet x 115 feet. It was noted that the general area is created of lots of comparable size. Commission discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF LAND DV # 161 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:: 1. There shall be required the installation of curbs; gutters, paving and sidewalks along England Avenue to City Standards. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. RJ Page Minutes•- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. DIVISION OF LAND: DV #162 Applicant - Mullins fit Sloan Co. To allow the Division of Land of the following described property into two individual parcels: DIVISION I: Block 2508 and'the E'ly 100 feet of Block 2507 of the East Side Villa Tract; EXCEPT that portion of said Block 2508 described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the S line of said block with the W line of the E'ly 20 feet of said block; thence W'ly 135 feet along said south line; thence N'ly 152 feet parallel with said W line; thence E'ly 67.50 feet parallel with said S line; thence NE'ly in a direct -line to a point on said W line, N'ly 192 feet from the point of beginning; thence S'ly 192 feet to the point of beginning. DIVISION II: That portion of Lot 2508 of the East Side Villa Tract described as follows: Beginning at the inter- section of the S line of said lot with W line of the E'ly 20 feet of said lot; thence W'ly 135 feet along S line; theftce N'ly 152 feet parallel with said W line; thence E'ly 67.50 feet parallel with said S line; thence NE'ly in a direct line to a point on said W line, N'ly 192 feet from the point of beginning; -thence S'ly 192 feet to the point of beginning. The Secretary'read the staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being -no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed -out that the purpose of this application is to create a service station site from w1arger parcel of land at the•north-' west corner of Beach Blvd. and Yorktown Street, The Planning Director further pointed out that the street improvements will be installed on Beach Blvd. and Yorktown Street along the service station - 7 - 41 Page Mfg .. Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 corner at the time the station is constructed and since the remainder of the property is also zoned for business, the street improvements will have to be installed at the time of its development. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF LAND DV # 162 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION ; 1. There shall be required the installation of curbs, gutters, paving and sidewalks along Division I and Division II to City Standards. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #372 Applicant - Georde M. Holstein & Sons To allow the existing subdivision directional sign 20 ft x 60 ft to remain at its present location for one year. Located on the east side of Beach Blvd. and north of Terry Avenue and legally described as the W'ly 607 feet of the S z of the NW 4 of .the:_ NW . 4 of - Section 24-5-11 SBB & M. The staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed out that this application is for a tract sign at the southeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Terry'Drive being about 1/4 mile north of Warner Avenue. Upon investigation, it was deter- mined that the sign had to be moved about four months ago from the northeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Terry Drive to the southeast corner due to construction of a service station. In any event, it is the same sign approved about a year ago, but is now located about 100 feet farther south. 42 Page #9 Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 was held. Commission discussion A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #372 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a $250 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Variance No. 372. 2. A $250 bond for the requested sign shall be required to be posted guaranteeing removal of the sign within one year of the Use Variance. In the event the specified sign is not removed in accordance with this use variance, the applicant shall forfeit bond and permit the appointed agents of the City to enter the property and remove all structures per- mitted under this use variance. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller., Chairman Stang, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV #373 To allow the construction AARplicant - Ferman W. McClellan of a covered patio to encroach to within 15 feet of the rear property line in deviation to the required 20 feet rear yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located on the south side of Sisson Drive and legally described as Lot 55, Tract 3657 (Stardust Homes). The Secretary read the staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. It was pointed out that this is another routine case of a patio cover encroaching a short distance into the required rear yard. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #373 WITH TIDE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. The patio area shall not be enclosed to create a room. �1 43 Patio i�10 - Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #374 Applicant - Joseph P. Gleason, M.D. To allow the construction of a Medical Center in • the A-1-X General Agri- cultural District. Located south of Smeltzer Avenue and approxi- mately 350 feet east of Springdale Street and legally described as the east 150 feet of the north 2 acres of the west 16 acres of the NW of the NW 4 of Section 22-5-11 SBB & M.- The staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Edmond, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that he was opposing the 100 ft set- back from the centerline of Edinger Avenue. He stated that the parking should be the same number of spaces as required of other professional districts or one space for each 300 sq. ft. of gross floor area. comment, the hearing was closed. • There being no further Commission discussion was held at length. It was noted that the property involved is located within a commercial area although the zoning on said property is still A-1-X, General Agricultural, but it appears that changes will be made in the near future. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY WELCH TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #374 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Widen Edinger Avenue to 50 feet from centerline; - 10 - Page Jill Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 2. Install curb, gutter, paving and sidewalk on Edinger Avenue ,.to City Standards. 3. Locate the building a minimum of 100 feet from -the centerline of Edinger Avenue. 4. Provide and maintain one parking space for each'300 sq. ft. of gross floor area in the building. 5. Pave the parking area with plant mix surfacing. 6. Construct a 6 ft masonry wall on the east and south sides of the property. 7. Participate in the assessments for sewer, water and drainage applicable to the area. 8. Any signs detached from the building to comply with the sign provisions of the C-4 Zone. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV #375 To allow the construction Applicant - Herbert W. Prosser, Jr. of a detached garage and home work shop in the R-1 Single Family Residence District to encroach to within 52 feet from the main dwelling in deviation to the required 6 ft distance. Located at the NW corner of Thomas Lane and Audrey Drive and legally described as Lot No. 31, Tract 3616, known as 16051 Thomas Lane, Huntington Beach, Calif. Staff Report. The Secretary read the The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed out that the variance requested in this case is very minor and involves a detached garage proposed to be located just short of the required distance from the main building. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WQRTHY 45 Page #12 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA -VARIANCE AV #375 WITH- OUT CONDITIONS. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV #376 Applicant - Pioneer Construction Co. To allow a 15 ft rear yard . setback in deviation to the required 20 ft rear yard -set- back on Lot No. 11, Tract No. 4329, and to allow a 17 ft rear yard setback in deviation to the -required 20 ft rear yard setback on Lots No. 14, 25, 28 and 39, Tract No. 4329 in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located east of Golden - west Street and approximately 440 ft north of Slater Avenue. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; -there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed out to the Commission that -this application involves minor reduction in rear yards for five irregular shaped cul-de-sac lots in a new tract. In each case, a corner of the house pro- jects approximately five feet into the yard, but the rear yard averages well over 20 feet. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #376 WITH- OUT CONDITIONS. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 12 - 46 Page #13 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION: UV #377 Applicant - Dave Frampton To allow the construction of a light industrial building in the A-1-X General Agricultural District. Located 267 feet north of Garfield Street and the west side of Crystal Street and legally described as Lot 23, Block E, Garfield Street Addition. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience. -Dave Frampton, 1834 Main Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated that there will be adequate off street parking provided -for the proposed -industrial building. He stated that the proposed structure will'Abe A stucco type modern building. comment, the hearing was closed. There being no further The Planning Director pointed out that the present state of the immediate vicinity would tend to indicate that industry is the only future for the area. However, a careful study of the overall picture makes1zhis highly questionable. There is considerable oil production in the area. Directly across the street is a small oil refinery; about one half mile north is a black -top plant and tile -plant. Commission discussion was held at length. • A -MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO FEBRUARY 20, 1962. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 13 - 47 Page #14 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 AREA VARIANCE: AV #378 To allow the construction of Applicant - Robert E. LaValley a 6 ft block wall fence within the exterior side yard to en- croach to the side property line. Located at the southwest corner of Hamden Lane and New Haven Lane, and legally described as Lot 120, Tract No. 3908, Huntington Hills, being'in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. It was noted that this is another routine case of a 6 ft block wall in the exterior side yard of a corner lot. - A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA VARIANC2 AV #378 WITH- OUT CONDITIONS. ROLL CALLVOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP#146 To allow the construction of Applicant - Robert L. Taube a commercial.building in the C-4 Highway Commercial Dis- trict with setback provisions. Located at the southwest corner 11W of Ronald Road and Beach Blvd., and legally described as the Northly 100 ft of Lot 18, Tract No. 3478, known as 17827-38 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, California. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. - 14 - Page #15 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY WELCH TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 146. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP #147 Applicant - George Holstein To allow the existing sub- division directional sign 10 ft x 60 ft to remain at its present location for one year. Located at the southeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Heil Avenue, and legally described as a portion of Section 24-5-11 SBB & M. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The public hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. The Planning Director pointed out that the tract being advertised has not been completed and apparently the sign is necessary for an additional period of time. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUF44AN AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 147 WITH THE FOL- LOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a $250 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit No. 147. 2. A $250 bond for the requested sign shall be required to be posted guaranteeing removal of the sign within one year of the Use Permit. In the event the specified sign is not removed in accordance with this use -permit, the applicant shall forfeit bond and permit the appointed agents of the City to enter the property and remove all structures permitted under this use permit. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: -None. 1W - 15 - 19 Page #16 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 ABSENT:. None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP # 148 To allow the existing subdivi- Applicant - Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co. sion directional sign 10 ft x 30 ft in the A-1-X General Agricultural District to remain at its present location for one year. Located at the southeast corner of Edinger Avenue and Springdale Street and legally described as the north 165 feet of the east 540 .feet of the NW.-4 of the NW 4 of the NW 4 of Section 22-5-11-. the Secretary. The staff report was read by The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WELCH AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 148 WITH THE - FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a $250 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit No. 148. 2. A.$250 bond for -the requested sign shall be required to be posted guaranteeing removal of the sign within one year of the Use Permit. In the event the specified sign is not re- moved in accordance with this use permit, the applicant shall forfeit bond and permit the appointed agents of the City to enter the property and remove all structures permitted under this use permit. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO. 149 Applicant - Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co. To allow the existing sub- division directional sign 10 ft x 40 ft in the A-1-X General Agricultural District to remain at its present location for one year. Located west of Beach Blvd., and approximately 140 feet - 16 - 50 Page #17 Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission , Tuesday, February 6, 1962 south of Aldrich Street and legally described as 1.ot No..38, Tract 417. The staff report was read by the Secretary. He also read a letter of protest,submitted by Effie Neiderhiser. It was noted that this was another request of a tract sign renewal. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 149 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a $250 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit No. 149. 2. A $250 bond for the requested sign shall be required to be posted guaranteeing removal of the sign within one year of the Use Permit. In the event the specified sign is not re- moved in accordance with this use permit, the applicant shall forfeit bond*and permit the appointed agents of the City to enter the property and remove all structures permitted under this use permit. ROLL CALL VOTE: . AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman. Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP #150 To allow the existing sub - Applicant - Stabile Bros. division directional sign 10 ft x 30 ft in the R-4-X Suburban Residential District to remain at its present location for one year. Located approximately 660 feet south of Garfield Avenue and west of Beach Blvd., and legally described as Block 3008 East Side Villa Tract. the Secretary. The staff report was read by The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. - 17 - 51 Page #18 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 The Planning Director pointed out t that this application involves another tract sign, but a little different situation exists. The sign advertises Huntington Hills and is located on the property where their model homes were built. The application for the model homes was approved for a two year period, but the sign for only one year. This happened because the sign was on a separate application. Commission discussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 150 WITH THE FOL- LOWING CONDITIONS: . 1. The expiration date will be the same as that for•the model homes. 2. There shall be posted a $250 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit No. .150. 3. A $250 bond for the requested sign shall be required to be posted guaranteeing removal of the sign within one year of the Use Permit. In the event the specified sign is not re- moved in accordance with this use permit, the applicant shall forfeit bond and permit the appointed agents of the City to enter the property and remove all structures permitted under this use permit. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP #151 To allow the existing subdivision Applicant - Pacific Sands directional sign 10 ft x 30 ft in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District to remain at its present location for one year. Located at the northeast corner of Atlanta Avenue and Beach Blvd., and legally described as the south 295 feet of the west 3&6 feet of the SW 4 of Section 12-6-11 SBB & M. . The Secretary read .the staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. 52 Page #19 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WELCH TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 151 WITH THE FOL- LOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be posted a $250 performance bond guaranteeing removal upon expiration of Use Permit No. 151. 2. A $250 bond for the requested sign shall be required to be posted guaranteeing removal of the sign within one year of the Use Permit. In the event the specified sign is not re- moved'in accordance with this use permit, the"applicant shall forfeit bond and permit the appointed agents of the City to enter the property and remove all structures permitted under this use permit. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED.. REQUEST OF SCHOOL SITE APPROVAL SITE #15 - OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT Located 1320 feet south of the centerline of Edinger Avenue and 210 feet east of the centerline of Edward Street. Further legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. The Secretary read a letter submitted by the Ocean View School District requesting an approval of School Site #15. The Planning Director pointed out that this is a slightly changed site from the site previously considered, due to revision of the proposed subdivision around the site. A MOTION WAS MADE. BY BAZ IL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE SCHOOL SITE NO. 15. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 19 - 53 Page #20 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 DIVISION OF LAND: DV #163 To divide a parcel of land from a Applicant - Jay D. Tucker portion of Lot B, Block 2906, East Side Villa Tract. Futther legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED -BY LETSON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF LAND DV #163 TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. There shall be required the installation of curbs, gutters, paving and sidewalk along Seventeenth Street to City Standards. ROLL CALL VOTE: - AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman,'Worthy-, Miller,*Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 86 HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE - TEMPORARY DIRECTIONAL SIGNS IN ALL ZONES. A Discussion was held by the Commission re- garding temporary direc- tional subdivision signs in all zones. The proposed amendment is patterned.after the present County Ordinance and would eliminate practically all variances and use permits for signs. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO ADVERTISE SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 86, HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE - TEMPOR- ARY DIRECTIONAL SIGNS IN ALL ZONES FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 6, 1962. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller,'Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 20 - 54 Page #21 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 6, 1962 ZONE STUDY: The Commission discussed a suggestion to rezone the area generally between Quincy and C1ay.Streets and between the Southern Pacific Railroad and Florida Avenue. A study was submitted by the Planning Department which indicated most of the area now zoned M-2-0 proposed for R-2-0 with the exception of property -along Quincy Avenue which was proposed for R-3-0. It was agreed that the matter be held over until the next meeting for further study. STUDY OF REZONING AREA FOR 17th STREET Discussion was held regarding a sug- gestion to rezone the area from 17th Street to 23rd Street and Palm Avenue to Ocean Avenue to eliminate the existing M-2-0 Zone. The Staff submitted a study for consideration to the Commission. The study proposed a business zone for properties fronting on both sides of 17th Street, R-2-0 between Palm and Magnolia; R-3-0 between Magnolia and Olive, and R-4-0 between Olive and the alley near Ocean Avenue. The Com- mission felt that the proposed business zone along 17th Street should be C-2. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO ADVERTISE RESOLUTION'OF INTENT NO. 234 AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 6, 1962. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. W. C. Warner Secretary THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS THE MEETING ADJOURNED. -- .. _ Chairman - 21 -