HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-03-0677
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council'Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY. MARCH 6th. 1962
COP*IISSIONERS PRESENT: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller,
Chairman Stang.
C0101ISSIONERS ABSENT: Welch.
MINUTES: On motion by Worthy and seconded by Miller,
the Minutescf the Huntington Beach Planning
Commission of February 20th, 1962, were accepted as transcribed
and mailed by the Secretary.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 4350 - PORTION
No. of Lots: 87 Subdivider: Macco Corp.
Total Acreage: 37.821 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc.
Located at the northeast corner of Adams
Avenue and Cannery Street and legally described as being a portion
of the SW-4 of"the SW4 of Section 6-6-10.
The Secretary read a supplemental report
to the Subdivision Committee Report of September 6, 1961, which
recommended that only the design and layout of the tract be
approved until such time as a'solution has been found to the pro-
blem of irrigation with sewer effluent in the area.
A letter submitted by the County Health
Department dated March 5, 1962, was read by the Secretary
stating that an agreement has been reached between•the subdivider
and the Talbert Irrigation District to comply with the operating
standards established by the Health Department and recommends
that the portion of the Tract west of the Flood Control Channel
be approved.
Commission discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED
BY WORTHY TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4350 - PORTION - UPON
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
78 Page #2
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
1. Condition No. 6 of the Tract Approval dated September 6, 1961,
is hereby deleted insofar as it applies to that portion of the
tract lying west of the flood control channel to be recorded
as Tract No. 4493.
2. All other applicable conditions of the approval dated September
6, 1961, and subsequent revisions, shall be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kauffman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 4392 - Continued
No. of Lots: 365 Subdivider: Pacific Sands
Total Acreage: 120 Engineer: Jennin;s-Halderman, Inc.
Located at the northwest corner of
Atlanta Avenue and Newland Street and legally described as portion
of the W2 of Section 12-6-11.
The Secretary stated that a letter
has been received from the County Health Department, dated March 6,
1962, stating that an agreement has been reached between the sub-
divider and the Talbert Irrigation District to comply with the
operating standards established by the Health Department and re-
commends that the Tract be approved.
Commission discussion was held.
Jim Deane, representing Pacific Sands,
stated that he was in accord with all suggested conditions for the
proposed tract.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4392 UPON THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. A chain link fence or equivalent shall be constructed along the
flood control channel to Flood Control District Standards.
2. Vehicular access rights to Indianapolis Street, Beach Blvd.,
Atlanta Avenue, and Newland Street shall be dedicated to the City.
3. Lots 64 thru 69 shall be deleted for single family use or an
additional tier of lots shall be created across the street from
said lots.
4. All standard subdivision requirements that are applicable shall
be complied with.
- 2 -
79
Page #3 --
Minutes - H. B. Plannin-., Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES,: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 3646 and 3647
No. of Lots: 163 Subdivider: Doyle and Shields
Total Acreage: 41.23 Engineer: .Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc.
Located on the north side of Heil
y Avenue between Graham and Springdale Streets and legally described
as a portion of the NE4 of Section 21-5-11 SBB & M.
The Secretary stated that the Sub -
`division Committee has reviewed the Tentative Map of Tracts No.
3646 and 3647.
Discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS NO. 3646 AND
3647 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Lot No. 85 of Tract 3647 shall not be approved for Commercial
use.
2. All applicable conditions of approval of the original tenta-
tive map shall be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #384
Applicant - Bay -Ready Mix, Inc.
To conduct a general
building material business
and ready -mix concrete
business and to allow the construction of storage sheds, offices,
garage, rest rooms and ready -mix concrete plant in the A-1-Y
General Agricultural District. Located east of Bushard Street
and approximately 600 feet south of Hamilton Avenue and legally
described as the Sz of the NW4 of the SE4 of Section 18-6-10 SBB & M.
3 -
so Page r4
Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
The Staff report was read by
the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience, Mr.
Harold F. Craig, an adjoining property owner, addressed the Com-
mission and stated that he was opposing the construction of the
proposed ready -mix concrete plant because the.area has a great
potential for single residence use.
the hearing was closed.
There being no further comment,
Discussion was held at length.
It was noted that the applicant has not submitted plot plans show-
ing the location of the proposed plant.
THE MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING.TO MARCH 20, 1962)
AND TO REQUEST THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT A PLOT PLAN OF THE PRO-
POSED DEVELOPMENT AND PARTICULARLY, THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
READY -MIX PLANT.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letsbn, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #385
Applicant - Donald E. Griffin
To allow the construction of
a patio cover 16 ft x 18 ft
to encroach to within 12 ft
of the rear property line in deviation to the required 20 ft
rear yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District
and to within 33 inches of the side property line in deviation
to the required 5 ft side yard. Located at the southwest corner
of Orinda Circle and Newland Street and legally described as Lot
52, Tract No. 3440 (Moore Homes).
report.
The Secretary read the Staff
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
- 4 -
M
Page #5
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
Commission discussion was held.
The,Planning Director pointed out;that since the patio cover is
attached to the house, it becomes a part of that building and
is required to meet the same side yard provisions of five feet.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE: AV #385 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. That the covered patio shall not be enclosed to make a room.
2. That a five foot side yard setback shall be maintained.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED..
AREA VARIANCE: AV #393
Applicant - Helen L. Gleason
To allow the construction of a
covered patio to encroach to with-
in 8 feet of the rear property
line in deviation to the required 20 ft rear yard setback.
Located at 8532 Lamar Drive and legally described as Lot 45,
Tract 3440 (Moore Homes), Huntington Beach, California.
The Staff report was read by the
Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mr. Gleason, 8532 Lamar Drive, Huntington Beach,
addressed the Commission and stated that the patio is not
.physically connected to the house.
the hearing w4s closed.
There being no further comment,
Commission discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE: AV #393 UPON THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. That a 5 ft side yard setback be maintained.
2. That the patio shall not be enclosed to make a room.
- 5 -
82 Pabe V6
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
USE VARIANCE: UV #394
Applicant - Peter D. Ciddio
To allow the use of home tele-
phone for business purposes in
the R-1 Single Family Residence
District. Located at 5211 Heil Avenue and legally described as
Lot 7, Tract 3752 (Huntington Village), Huntington Beach, Calif.
The Staff report was read by
the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mrs. Fox, adjacent property owner,,addressed the Com-
mission and stated that she did not want the proposed home
occupation to become a permanent business because of the increased
traffic flow. Mrs. Ciddio, 5211 Heil Avenue, addressed the Com-
mission and stated that any trucks or tractors will be kept at a
different location and not at the home.
Mr. David Maddox, 5231'Hei1
Avenue, addressed the Commission and stated that he is opposed
to the variance on grounds that a residential area should be kept
as stipulated in the Ordinance Code and no business should be
allowed,
Fire Chief Higgins stated that
fire zone #2 requirements would create problems for business use.
Chairman Stang questioned the
exact location where the trucks will be kept. Mrs. Ciddio stated
that 6052 Edinger Avenue has been the address and the only reason
for requesting the variance is to have a private telephone in-
stalled for taking business calls.
the hearing was Slosed.
at length.
There being no further comment,
Commission discussion was held
EKs�
Pabe #7
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED;BY LETSON TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION UV #394
UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. No trucks, tractors, or other equipment used in the business
to be kept on the premises or on the streets in the vicinity.
2. Approval of UV #394 will expire on March 1, 1963.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION: UV #395 To allow fertilizer to be
Applicant - Jean Turner
stored outside the building
and also to allow various
articles, structures and signs to encroach within the required
front yard area in the C-4 Highway Commercial District. Located
on the west side of Beach Blvd. approximately 30b feet north of
Ellis Avenue. Further legal description on file in the Plan-
ning Department Office.
The Secretary read the Staff
report. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Thomas
Turner, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission
and stated that the applicant is maintaining adequate parking
space and that he was for granting the variance.
the hearing was closed.
There being no further comment,
Commission discussion was held
at length. The Planning Director pointed out that the property
was included in'a rezoning to C=4 which allows nurseries on the
condition that fertilizer is stored within a building. The
qudstion arose as to whether the zoning superceded the variance
granted May 17, 1960, and whether or not the conditions imposed
on'the variance would still apply. He further pointed out that
the opinion from the City Attorney was to the effect that the
zoning takes precedence and the variance and its conditions are
- 7 -
84
Pa,,e #8
Minutes - 11. B. Plannin- Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
no longer in effect. Therefore, there are only two conditions that
are applicable to the nursery at present: (1) Fertilizer storage
within a building, and (2) A 50 foot setback along Beach Blvd.
It was further noted that
during the past two years, there has gradually been encroachment
into the setback area by fences, small sheds, and merchandise.
The Planning Director pointed out that all of the above mentioned
objects have been in violation of both the terms of the variance
and the setback provisions.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO DENY CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
UV #395.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO. 234
Initiated by Resolution
of Intent
CHANGE OF ZONE, relative
to proposed change of dis-
trict boundaries and use
classifications as follows: FROM: M-2-0 Industrial District
combined with oil to R-2-0 Two -Family Residence District combined
with oil. Property situated generally between Palm Avenue,
Magnolia Avenue, 17th Street and 23rd Street. Lots 2, 45 6, 85
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 225 24, 26, and 28, Block 517. Lots;2,
4, 6, 85 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, and 28, Block 617.
And all of Blocks 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 618, 619, 620, 621,
and 622, Huntington Beach Tract, Seventeenth Street Section.
FROM: M-2-0 Industrial District combined with oil to R-3-0
Limited Multiple Family Residence District combined with oil.
Property situated between Magnolia Avenue, Olive Avenue, 17th
Street and 23rd Street. Lots 2, 41 65 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20,
22, 24, 26, and 28, Block 317;• and all of Blocks 318, 319, 320,
321, 322, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, Huntington Beach Tract,
V•
Pa,,e #9
Minutes - H. B. Planninj Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
Seventeenth Street Section. FROM: M-2-0 Industrial District
combined with oil to R-4-0 Multiple Family Residence District
eombined with oil. Property situated between Olive Avenue, the
alley north of and,paralleling Ocean Avenue, 17th Street, and
23rd Street, Lots 12, 14, 16,•18, 20, and 22, Block 117.
Lots 11 through 22, Block 118. Lots 11 through 22, Block 119.
Lots 11 through 22, Block 120. Lots 11 through 22, Block 121.
Lots 11 through 22, Bloch 122. Lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16,
183 201 22, 24, 26, and 28, B1ock,217. All.of Blocks 218, 219,
220, 221,.and 222, Huntington Beach Tract, Seventeenth Street
Section. FROM: M-2-0 Industrial District combined with oil to
C-2-0 Community Business District combined with Qil. Property
situated on both sides o� 17th Street between Palm Avenue and
the alley north of and paralleling Ocean Avenue. Lots 12, 14,
16, 18, 20, and 22, Block 116. Lots 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, and
21, Block 117. Lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12,. 14, 16, 18, 20, 22,
24, 26, and 28, B1ock,216.. Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17,
19, 21, 23, 25, and 27, Block 217. Lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12,
14, 16, 18, 20, 22., 24, 26, and 28, Block 316. Lots 1, 3, 5,
73 9,5 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, and 27, Block 317. Lots
2, 4, 6, 8, 103 125 14, .16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, and 28, Block
416. Lots 2, 45 63 8, 10, 12, 145 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, and
28, Block 516. Lots 1, 3, 55 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 195 21, 235
25, and 27, Block 517,. Lots 2, 42 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20,
22, 24, 26, .and 28, Block'616, Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15,
17, 19, 21, 23, 25, and 27,,Block 617., Huntington Beach Tract,
Seventeenth Street Section. .
The Secretary read five communi-
cations submitted by property owners all within the proposed
change -of zone to R-2-0 requesting consideration of zoning to
R-3 and R-4. Also a letter was read by the Secretary, submitted
by D.B.M. Oil Company, Long Beach, California, stating their
opposition to the proposed zone change.
Pa e #10
Minutes'- H. B. Planning" Commission .
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mr. Charles Cather, Ocean Front Oil Company representa-
tive, addressed the Commission and opposed the change of zone.
Mr. W. M. Elliott, owner of
property, stated that he was,opposing the zone change because
there were too many -oil wells in.the vicinity to construct resi-
dences.
Mr. A. C. Marion, oil operator,
also.opposed the zone change. C
Mr. Jack Denardis,'19th-Street,
Huntington Beach, stated that he was a manufacturer -and is oppoeed
to the change.
Mr. Jack Creed, 601 19th Street,
Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated that he has
built his home among the few existing oil wells and -was "in favor
of the.proposed change.
Mr.. E . R . Haynes, 167-7 2 Ro s s
Lame,, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and protested
the rezoning on the grounds ,that not,ver-y at -tractive homes could
be built in the area where existing oil wells are situated.
Mrs. .Creed, owner; of, property
on 19th Street, stated that there were a number -of -attractive.
homes located near oil wells in -the remainder of the field.
Mr. D.. Clausen, owner of pro-
perty within the subject area, stated that he wants the area -to
be rezoned to residential. C
There being no further comment,.
the hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 234
A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Makin; Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case No 234
to the City Council, Except for
the Proposed C-2-O-District on -
both sides of 17th Street.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 234 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF A PORTION OF ZONE CASE NO 234 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
- 10 -
Pa-e #11
Minutes - H. B. Plannin- Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
FOLLOWING SPECIFIED REASONS:
1. The area has been subdivided into residential size lots that
could not be utilized properly for industrial use and under
the present zoning residences are not permitted.
2. Although the area is zoned for industrial use, it is basi-
cally being used as an oil field and not industrially as such.
3. The proposed rezoning is a vital step to insure the future
of the area as an extremely desirable residential area,
because of its proximity to the beaches.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO. 235
Initiated by Resolution
of Intent
A Resolution of Intention of
the City Planning Commission
of the City of Huntington Beach
initiating an amendment to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
by adding Article 868 to permit temporary directional subdivision
signs in all zones with limitations on -the size and the number
of signs permitted for any one development.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mr. Max Wisson, Attorney representing the Home Builders
Sign Association, addressed the Commission and pointed out various
suggested changes for consideration. He further stated that any
kind of sign should be permitted in the C and M Zones.
Jack Randall, representing the
Home Builders Association, addressed the Commission and stated
that the Commission should give further consideration to the
proposal for reduction of existing signs and also stated that
existing signs should be allowed for longer periods of -.time limit.
John May, R. H. Grant Co. repre-
sentative, stated that the signs are necessary to builders and
the number and size of signs should not be limited.
Mr. Glenn Swelterman, represent-
ing the McCarthy -Sant Development Co., stated that he also feels
Page #12
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962 '
that signs are very necessary to the builder and approximately
60% of homes are sold through the directional sign advertising.
Mr. Dan Meitenger, representing
the Doyle and Shields Development Co., stated that he was of the
same opinion as the previous representatives of different com-
panies.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held at length.
It was suggested that perhaps a committee made up'of two Com-
missioners, the Planning Director, and the City Attorney could
review the suggestions of the Sign Association and the builders.
The Chairman requested of those present that they submit their
objections and suggestions in writing to the Planning Department
by March 15 and that a Committee would review the matter to de=
termine what changes might be advisable. The Chairman appointed
Commissioners Letson and Bazil and the City Attorney and the
Planning Director as a committee to review the suggestions for
a report to the Commission at'the meeting of March 20.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY'WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO MARCH 20, 1962.
ROLL CALL VOTE: '
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE
PERMIT:
UP # 153
Columbia Outdoor
Advertising
Co.
USE
PERMIT:
UP #154
Columbia Outdoor
Advertising
Co.
USE
PERMIT:
UP #155
Columbia Outdoor
Advertising
Co.
USE
PERMIT:
UP #157
Columbia Outdoor
Advertising
Co.
USE
PERMIT:
UP•�1158
Genser Sign Co.
USE
VARIANCE:
UV #382
Columbia Outdoor
Advertising
Co.
USE
VARIANCE:, UV #f386
Genser Sign Co.
USE
VARIANCE:
UV �r387
Genser Sign Co.
USE
VARIANCE:
UV #388
Genser Sign Co.
12 -
Page #13
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
89
USE VARIANCE: UV #389
USE VARIANCE: UV #390
USE VARIANCE: UV #391
USE VARIANCE: UV #392
Genser Sil-n
Co.
Genser Sign
Co.
Genser Sign
Co.
Carter Sign
Co.
The hearing was opened to the
audience on the above listed sign applications; there being no
comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE NEXT REGULAR
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1962.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
STUDY OF REZONING: AREA BETWEEN CLAY AND QUINCY AND BETWEEN
S.P.R.R/W AND FLORIDA AVENUE.
The Commission discussed a
suggestion to rezone the area generally between Quincy, Yorktown,
Alabama and Florida Streets. It was unanimously agreed to change
the north side of Quincy Avenue from M-2-0 to R-3-0 and'the re-
mainder of the area from M-2-0 to R-2-0.
RESOLUTION OF INTENT NO. 242 A Resolution of Intent of the
City Plannin- Commission
Initiating a Change of Zone on
Certain Property from 1.I-2-0 to
R-2-0 and R-3-0.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 242 AND SET THE MATTER
FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 3, 1962.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
- 13 -
N
Page #14
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
COMMUNICATION:- ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Secretary read a letter sub-
mitted by the Orange County Planning Commission regarding Use
Variance No UV•4941 to permit the renovation of interior and ex-
terior walls and fixtures of an existing duplex with one attached
garage on a lot containing less than the required area in the
Sunset Beach area.
request at length.
The Commission discussed the
• A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO WRITE A LETTER
TO ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF
UV #4941.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, -Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DIVISION OF LAND: DV #164
Applicant - Southern Calif.
Edison Co.
To allow the division of land of
the following described property
into two individual parcels:
DIVISION I: The east half of the SWk of Section 16-5-11, ex-
cepting therefrom the east 322 feet of the north 250 feet of the
south 380 feet. DIVISION II: The east 322 feet of the south 380
feet of the east half of the SA of Section 16-5-11, excepting
therefrom the south 130 feet.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was held.
The Planning Director pointed out that the purpose of the appli-
cation is to create a parcel of slightly over 12 acres for an
Edison installation at the northwest corner of Edinger and Graham
Streets.
- 14 -
91
Paee #15
Minutes --H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER
AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF LAND
DV #164 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. Dedication and improvement on Graham Street on an alignment
meeting the approval of the City Engineer.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DIVISION OF LAND: DV #165 To allow the division of land
Applicant - Rinker Dev. Co.
of the following described
property into two individual
parcels: DIVISION I: The east 192.00 feet of the south 210.00
feet of the SW4 of Section 24-5-11. DIVISION II: That portion
of the east one-half of the SE-4 of the SW4 of Section 24-5-11,
lying south of the S'ly line of the 78 ft strip of land granted
to the -Orange County Flood Control District, excepting the east
192.00 feet of the south 210.00 feet of the SW4 of Section
24-5-11.
The herring was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
Discussion was held at length.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF LAND
DV #165 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. There shall be required dedication of 42 feet from the center-
line of Newland Street and 60 feet from the centerline of
Warner Avenue for Parcel #2.
2. There shall be required dedication and improvement of 42 feet
from centerline of Newland Street and dedication and improve-
ment of 60 feet from centerline of Warner Avenue on Parcel #1.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welch.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
- 15 -
92 ,
Page #16
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 6, 1962
W. C. Warner
Secretary
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS
THE MEETING ADJOURNED.
'Edward Stang
Chairman