HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-03-2093
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY, rLkRCH 2Oth, 1962
CGRi-IISSIONERS PRESENT: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy
Miller, Chairman Stang.
COrRgISSIONERS ABSENT: None.
MINUTES: On motion by Worthy and seconded by Letson,
the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Plan-
ning Commission of March 6th, 1962, were accepted as transcribed
and mailed by the Secretary.
USE VARIANCE: UV.#334 - Continued To conduct a general
Applicant - Bay Ready -Mix, Inc.
building material
business and ready -mix
concrete business and to allow the construction of storage sheds,
offices,.garage, rest rooms and ready -mix concrete plant in the
A-1-Y General Agricultural District. Located east of Bushard
Street and approximately 600 feet south of Hamilton Avenue and
legally described as the S2 of the NW4 of the SE4 of Section
1$-6-10 SBB & M.
The Secretary read a
communication submitted by the Costa Mesa County Water District,
stating their opposition to the proposed ready -mix plant.
The hearing was opened
,to the audience. Mr. Harold Craig, adjoining property owner,
addressed the Commission and stated that he was opposed to the
cement plant.
Mr. Victor Meyer, 1101
Sherman Way, Garden Grove, owner of adjoining property, addressed
the Commission and spoke against the proposal.
Dale Heinly, Attorney
representing the developer of Tract No. 3903, stated -that he was
opposing the ready -mix plant on grounds that the area is choice
property and an ideal location for.single residences being close
to the beach.
94
Page ;�2
Minutes— H. B. Plannin; Commission
Tuesday, Mprch 7,O, 1962
Comment, the hearing was closed.
There being no further '
Commission discussion was
held at length. The Planning Director pointed out.that the pro-
posed use is a business that now exists in Costa Mesa, which does
not have room for expansion, thus necessitating a move to larger
quarters. He further pointed out that part of the request is
for a general building material business, which is permitted
under the M-1 Zone to be effective soon. The Planning Director
stated that the second part of the request is for a ready -mix
plant, which is why the application was filed. Under the Code,
concrete and concrete products manufacture requires a variance
if within 2000 feet of property zoned for residential or agri-
cultural use. It was the concensus of the Commission that this
application does not set a precedent for other similar uses.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
WORTHY AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE: UV #384
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS AND UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
REASONS:' 1. Location being within one-half mile of the large
rotary mud dump, the County Dispos4l. Station and
the Edison Company generating station.
2. Location is also just over one -quarter mile from
the sewer plant.
CONDITIONS: 1. _.There shall be required a setback of 150 feet
from side and rear property lines and 900 feet
from Bushard Street for the Ready -Mix plant.
2. All roadways shall be surfaced,to prevent dust.
3. Bushard Street shall be dedicated to 40 feet
from centerline.
4. All improvements along Bushard Street shall be
installed meeting the approval of the City
Engineer.
ROLL CALL`VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
- 2 -
95
Pa, e #3
Minutes - H. B. Plannins, Commission
Tuesday, I -larch 20, 1962
PUBLIC HEARING Initiated by Resolution of Intent
ZONE CASE No..235 - Continued
A Resolution of Intention of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach initi-
ating an amendment to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code by
adding Article 868 to permit temporary directional subdivision
signs in all zones with limitations on the size and the number
of signs permitted for any one development.
The Secretary presented three
communications submitted by the (1) Home Builders Association,
(2) Wiscot & Lotwin Law Offices, and (3) Robert H. Grant & Co.,
all of which concerned recommendations for changes of the
proposed ordinance regarding "Temporary Directional Subdivision
Signs". The Secretary reported on the review of the suggested
changes by the Committee appointed at the last meeting and the
modifications recommended by the.Committee.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there bang no comment, the hearing was closed.
Discussion was held by the
Commission.
RESOLUTION NO, 235 A Resolution of the City Plannin-
Commission Makin; Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case No. 235
4 with'su-;vested-modifications to
the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 235 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 235 TO THE CITY COUNCIL,
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES:. Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
- 3 -
96pa Je #4
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#153
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#158
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#159
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#f160
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#161
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#162
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#163
USE
PERMIT : ,
UP
#164
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#165
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#166
USE
PERMIT:
UP
#167
USE
VARIANCE:
UV
#386
USE
VARIANCE:
UV
#387
USE
VARIANCE:
UV
#388
USE
VARIANCE:
UV
#389
USE
VARIANCE:
UV
#390
USE
VARIANCE:
UV
#391
Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co.
Genser Sign Co..
Stabile Signs, Inc.
Stabile Signs, Inc.
Stabile Signs, Inc.
Stabile Signs, Inc.
Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co.
Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co..
Columbia Outdoor Advertisin;; Co.
Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co.
Carter Sign Co.
Genser Sign Co.
Genser Sign Co.
Genser Sign Co.
Genser Sign Co.
Genser Sign Co.
Genser Sin Co.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE ALL OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED USE PERMITS
AND'USE VARIANCES UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. There shall be posted a-$250.00 performance bond guaranteeing
removal upon expiration of all the above stated applications.
2. A $250.00 bond for the requested signs shall be required to
be posted guaranteeing removal of the signs within one year of
the approval of the applications. In the event the specified
signs are not removed, the applicants shall forfeit the bonds
and permit the appointed agents of the City to enter the
property and remove all structures permitted under.these
applications.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP #154
USE PERMIT: UP #155
USE.,PERMIT: UP #157
USE VARIANCE: UV #362
USE VARIANCE: UV #392
Columbia Outdoor Advertisin- Co.
Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co.
Columbia Outdoor Advertising Co.
Columbia Outdoor.Adverti:sing Co.
Carter Sif n Co.
The hearing was opened to the
Audience. Mr. Pat Carter, Carter Sign Co., addressed the Com-
mission and questioned the effective date of the proposed sub-
division sign ordinance. The Planning Director stated that it would be
approx.six weeks before the proposed subdivision directional sign
ordinance would be in effect, assuming it is adopted by the City
Council.
- 4 -
Pale #5
Minutes - H. B. Plannin,� Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
97
Mr. Carter stated that he feels
that the proposed new signs should have the same rights regarding
the size as the existing signs which -have been granted for one
year extension of time.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was held at
length.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO APPROVE ALL THE ABOVE STIPULATED USE
PERMITS AND USE VARIANCES UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. That all the new signs shall comply with the provisions of
the proposed sign ordinance as recommended to the City Council.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING: Initiated by Resolution of Intent
ZONE CASE NO. 236
A Resolution of the City Planning
• Commission of the City of Huntington
Beach, California, initiating a suggested amendment to Section
9490.5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, regulating the
size of signs in the C-2 Community Business District.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was held.
RESOLUTION NO. 236 A Resolution of the City Plannin,,
Commission Making Recommendation
• of Approval of Zone Case No, 236
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WELCH AND
SECONDED BY LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 236 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 236 TO THE CITY COUNCIL,
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch., Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
—Stang.
- 5 -
98 Pa -re #6
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
PUBLIC HEARING:
ZONE CASE NO. 237
Initiated by Resolution of Intent
A Resolution of Intent of the
City Planning Commission of the
City of Huntington Beach, California, declaring its intention.to
amend the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to provide a uniform
front yard line along Beach Boulevard.
The Secretary read a communi-
cation submitted by the Dunvegan Corporation stating their protest
regarding.the establishment of a 50 foot setback along Beach Blvd.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. C. P. Malloy,_ 1720 Balboa Cove, Newport Beach,
addressed the Commission, and asked various questions regarding
the present setback along Beach Boulevard.
Mr. Sterling White, Land Develop-
ment Engineer of Macco Realty Co., addressed the Commission and
stated that the proposed uniform setback along Beach Boulevard
would create a hardship upon the owners he represents by depriving
them of use of approximately 75,000 sq. ft. of land. Mr. White
further stated that since this property, consisting of approxi-.
mately 24 acres, zoned R-5-0, and located south of Indianap9lis
and west of.Beach Boulevard, is proposed for a trailer park, there
will be a minimum of access onto Beach Boulevard. Mr. White
further .stated that if the proposed uniform setback ordinance be
adopted, there will be an unmaintained strip of 50 feet in width which
would be created for the full length of the property.
Mrs. Lorraine Webb, 2611 - 17th
Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated that
she was in favor of the proposed uniform setback ordinance.
Robert Potter, 18572 Beach
Boulevard, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated
that a 50 foot setback is not enough. He suggested 65 foot set-
back from front property line. .
S'�
Faoe #7 99
Tiinutes - 11. B. Plannin- Commission
Tuesday, Narch 20, 1962
Herbert Porter, 18383Beach Blvd.,
Huntington Beach, stated that he was in favor of the proposed
ordinance.
Tom Turner, 18421 Beach Blvd.,
Huntington Beach, stated that he was in favor of the uniform
setback ordinance and that it should apply to everyone along
Beach Boulevard.
Mr. Ray Murray, 17441 Beach
Boulevard, Huntington Beach, asked where he stands with his
existing building which is presently within the proposed 50
foot front yard setback.
Tim Talbert, 219 Main Street,
Huntington Beach,,addressed the Cqmmission, and stated that he
was representing his parents and would like to know what would
happen if Beach Boulevard will be widened.
The City Engineer.stated that if
the state highway is widened, it would not have any effect on
the setback line because there would be no access to Beach
Boulevard as it would affect the Talbert property.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
-RESOLUTION Td0, .2,�.-7 A Resolution of the City Flannin.
Commission Making Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case Uo. 237
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 237 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 237 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman,.Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
- 7 -
100 Page #8
Minutes - H. B. Plannin- Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
PUBLIC HEARING:
ZONE CASE NO. 238
Initiated by Resolution of Intent
A Resolution of Intent of the
City Planning Commission of
the.City of Huntington Beach, California, initiating a change
of zone from A-1-X General Agricultural District as adopted by
Interim,Ordinance No. 668 to M-1-0 Light Industrial District
combined with oil production on property located north of Garfield
Avenue and east of Goldenwest•Street. Further legal description
on file in the Planning Department -Office.
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Charles Vavra, 18736 Goldenwest Street, Huntington
Beach, addressed the -Commission and objected to the proposed
zone change on grounds that his property would be divided by the
M-1 boundary.
• John Wilson, 2401 Queensberry
Road, Pasadena, addressed the Commission and questioned the in-
crease in taxes, street improvements and effect on oil leases
if the proposed zone change would be adopted.
Chairman Stang stated that
there would be no difference in tax increase or oil leases.
Mr. Hudson DeCray, 434 -
17th Street, Santa Monica, addressed the Commission and asked
various questions.
E. S. Tayloe, Holly Sugar Co,
representative, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of
the proposal.
George Renner, 807 Frankfort
Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and requested
that his property at the southeast corner of Holly and Garfield
be rezoned back to M-1 zone.
The Chairman pointed out that
Mr. Renner's request will have to be applied for by separate
application since the subject property was not included in the
legal notice set for public hearing.
Page ,19
Minutes - H . B . P lannin3 Commis s ion
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
10i
the hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 238
There being no further comment,
A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Makin; Recommendation
of Approval of Zone Case Leo. 238
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND
SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 238 RECONJMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO. 238 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy,, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #396 To allow a 15 foot front yard set -
Applicant - Ilerbco
Construction Co. back in deviation to the required
20 foot front yard setback in the
R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located on the south side
of Medford Drive within Tract No. 4573, Lot No. 1; and to allow
a 15 foot front yard setback in deviation to the required 20
foot front yard setback on Lots No. 18 and 19 within Tract No.
4573, located on the cul-de-sac of the southeast side of Medford
Drive and Bayside Lane.
The Secretary read the Staff report.
The hearing was opened.to the
audience; there being no comment,the hearing was closed. Com-
mission discussion was held at length.
The Planning Director pointed out
that the Staff Report covers the next three item$, as each of
the items involves a front yard variance for lots in the same
development.. He further stated that in each case the lots are
either at the end of a cul-de-sac or on a "knuckle" which creates
irregular shaped lots. The Planning Director further.pointed out
that in two cases the houses could be moved back and thus main-
tain a 20 foot front yard and a_20 foot rear yard, but not in the
other four cases.
102 Page #10
Minutes - II. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO DENY AREA VARIANCE ON LOTS 1 AND 18 AND
APPROVE AREA VARIANCE FOR LOT NO. 19 WITH 18 FOOT -FRONT YARD.
SETBACK.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None. .
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION -CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #397
Applicant - Werbco
Construction Co.
To allow a 15 foot front yard
setback in deviation to the
required 20 foot front yard
setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located
northeast of Sydney Drive and Bayside Lane, and legally described
as Lots No. 18 and 19, Tract No. 4576.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE: AV #397 WITHOUT
CONDITIONS.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: .None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #39
Applicant - Werbco
Construction Co.
To allow a 15 foot front yard
setback in deviation to the
required 20 foot front yard
setback.in the R-1 Single Family Residence District.. Located on
the north side of Medford Drive and legally described as Lot 1,
Tract 4574.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
- 10 -
103
Page it'll
Minutes - H. B. Planning; Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE: AV #398 WITHOUT
CONDITIONS:
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES; Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE: AV #399 To allow the construction of a
Applicant - Rinker Dev. Co.
service station in the C-4 High-
way Commercial District with three
pump islands, floodlights and a rotating identification sign
-encroaching into the required 50 foot front yard setback.
Located at the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Newland
Street and legally described as the east 192.00 feet of the
south 210.00 feet of the SE4 of Section •24-5-11.
Secretary.
The Staff report was read by the
The hearing was opened -to the
audience; there being'no comment, the hearing was closed.
: Commission discussion -was held.
The Planning Director pointed out that the application is listed
as an Area Variance to permit the usual service station pumps,
-lights, and sign in the setback area. This would be permitted
under the proposed Code Amendment recently approved by the Com-
mission and approved by the City Council at their meeting of
March 19, 1962. He further.pointed out that there is one
technicality - the approval of the entire plot plan for the
service station for which a Use Permit would normally be required
in the C-4 zone. The procedures for public hearing, publication
and mailing of notices,.are identical under Area Variance or
Use Permit and the application and notice are broad enough -to
include both the construction of the station and the setback
matter.
104 Page #12
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE: AV #399 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE SERVICE STATION WITH PUMP ISLANDS, LIGHTS
AND SIGN WITHIN THE SETBACK AREA AS SHOWN ON THE PLOT PLAN.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang. _
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV # 400
Applicant - Plymouth
Foundation
To allow the construction of a
gasoline filling station in the
R-5 Professional Business Dis-
trict. Located at the southwest corner of Brunswick Drive and
Goldenwest Street and legally described as being a portion of
Section 15-5-11 SBB &.M. .
The Secretary read a letter of
protest submitted by 71 property owners within the Goldenwest
Estates. The staff report was read by the Secretary.
0
The hearing was opened to the
public. Mrs. Speer, 15502 Victoria, Huntington Beach, addressed
the Commission and stated that she was opposed to the gasoline
service station..
Mrs. Ann Bauer, Melbourne Lane,
Huntington Beach, stated that the service station would be a
definite detriment to the neighborhood.
Mr. Peter Packard, Dresden
Circle, Huntington Beach, stated that no one within the subdivision
is in favor of the proposed service station.
Rev. Clark Har$hf ield.; repre-
senting the Congregational Churches, spoke in favor of the pro-
posal. He explained the problems of finding a church site
location within the city. He further stated that the church
organization proposes to buy a strip of R-5 property for 4 church
but feels that it is economically infeasible without selling or
leasing the service station site.
- 12 -
Pa3e i�13
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commssion
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
105
Jeffrey Millet, addressed the
Commission, and stated that due to soil conditions (peat),
pilings will be necessary for buildings, which again is not
economically feasible for R-5 uses.
also protested the proposal.
Mrs. Levine, Goldenwest Estates,
Mr. William Lewis, Goldenwest
Estates, stated that he was opposed to the service station on
grounds that his house would be facing the proposed service
station site.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY WELCH TO DENY USE VARIANCE: UV #400.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE: UV #401 To allow the construction of five
Applicant - Wm. Lyon
model homes,•salcs office with
recreation area in the R-1 Single Family Residence District.
Located on the west side of Bushard Street and on both sides of
Lanai Circle, Huntington Beach, and legally described as Lots
62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, and 69, Tract No. 3903. Further
legal description on file in the Planning Department Office.
The Secretary read'the Staff report.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Attorney Dale Heinly,.representing the applicant,
addressed the Commission, and requested that posting of a bond
or contract should be considered.
the hearing was closed.
There being no further comment,
- 13 -
106 Pale #14
Minutes - 1-1. B. Plannin,; Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
The Planning Director pointed out
that the subject application is necessary because the final tract
map has not yet been recorded. He further stated that the developer
wishes to proceed with -the models in order to be ready for a sales
program this spring.
Commission discussion was held.
• A MOTION WAS MADE BY WELCH AND
SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #401 UPON THE FOL-
LOWING CONDITION::
1. There shall be posted a contract or a bond of $6000 to'
guarantee completion and conversion of the models to dwellings
and removal of the sales office and playground.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAINED:' Letson;
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DIVISION OF LAND: DV #166
Applicant - A. L. Gindling
To allow Division of Lot 7,
Tract No. 4361, into four parcels;
one of which is 50 feet wide and
contains 5000 sq.-ft..in deviation to the required 60 f,00t width
and•6000 sq. ft. area. Located west of Springdale Street and on
the north side of Hacienda Drive, Huntington Beach.
The Staff report was read by the
Secretary. C -
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Jeff Millet, representing the applicant, addressed the
Commission and requested that Division licit and "D" be approved,
and .that Division"A" and "Bit remain as one lot.
.There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
The Planning Director pointed
out that this prcperty is part of a brand•new tract recorded about
two months ago and one large lot was recorded instead of the four
14 -
107
Page i�15
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
lots originally intended. An existing house situated on Parcel
A of the proposed Division of Land and Parcel A is shown as a
70 foot lot to provide the required side yard. In so doing,
the adjoining lot, Parcel B, is proposed as a 50 foot lot, rather
than the required 60 foot. Parcel C and D are substantially the
same as originally proposed to be subdivided and do meet all
minimum requirements.
Commission discussion -was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED
BY MILLER TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF PARCELS C and D,
BUT NOT PARCELS A AND B-, TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch,' Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DIVISION OF LAND: DV #167 To allow the Division of Land of
Applicant - Hays W. White
the following described property
into four individual parcels.
Located at the northwest corner of Clay Street and Florida Avenue,
east of Seventeenth Street, and legally described as a portion of
Lot B. Block 2906, East Side Villa Tract. Further legal descrip-
tion on file in the.Planning Department office.
The Secretary read the Staff report.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
The Planning Director explained
that this is another parcel being created out of the triangular
block bounded by 17th Street,'Clay and Florida Streets. He
further pointed out that the subject property is well over the
minimum requirements.
Commission discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF LAND
- 15 -
Minutes - H. B. Planninj Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
DV #167 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. There shall be required the installation of curbs, gutters,
paving and sidewalks along Florida Avenue and Clay Street.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman,
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Worthy, Miller, Chairman
COMMUNICATION: - STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
The Secretary read a letter
submitted by the State Division of Highways regarding a public
hearing scheduled relative to the proposed improvement of Legis-
lative Route_60 in Orange County between 2.2 miles south of Mac-
Arthur Boulevard and Beach Boulevard, on April 19, 1962, at 1:30
P.M., at Newport Union High School.
Chairman Stang appointed the
Secretary to the Planning Commission to attend said hearing.
COMMUNICATION: - ORANGE COUNTY STREET NAMING C01MITTEE
The Secretary informed the
Commission that a notification has been received by the City Clerk
and transmitted to the City Council regarding a street name change
of Sugar Avenue to McFadden Avenue. It was further noted that the
City Council approved the street name change on March 19, 1962.
COMMUNICATION: - ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING CO1,24ISSION
The Secretary read a letter sub-
mitted by the Orange County Planning Commission.regarding Use
Variance No. 4949 to permit the construction of a single family
dwelling addition to an existing single family dwelling on a parcel
containing less than the required area and the elimination of one
of the two required off-street parking spaces in the R-4 Suburban
Residential District.
request at length.
The Commission discussed the
- -16 -
109
Pade # 17
Minutes - H. B. Plannin- Commission
Tuesday, March 20, 1962
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO WRITE A LETTER
TO ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF
UV #4949.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Welch, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman
Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,
THE MEETING ADJOURNED.
W. C. Warner 2dward Stang
Secretary Chairman
17 -