Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-06-05MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH'PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, City Hall - Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY. JUNE 5th, 1962 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Crabb, Chairman Stang. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Worthy ZONE CASE NO 254 A Resolution of the City Plan - Initiated by Resolution ning Commission of the City of of Intent Huntington Beach, California, initiating_an amendment to Section 9421.4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code regulating the size of signs in the C-4 Highway Commercial District. e - The hearing was 'opened to the. audience; there being no comment, it was closed. Commission discussion was held. RESOLUTION NO 254 A Resolution of the City Plan- ning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No 254 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 254 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 254 TO THE CITY COUNCIL: ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy ABSTAINED: Crabb THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED ZONE CASE NO 255 CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to pro - Applicant - B. C. Deane posed change of district boundary and use classification from: R-4-Y Suburban Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 672 to C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions and R-1 Single Family Residence District. The following parcel of real property as submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith: Located south of Adams Avenue and between Cannery and Bushard Streets and legally described as being a portion of the NW4 of Section 7-6-10, Tracts No 4284, 4495, and 4496. The Staff report was read by the Secretary. 189 Page #2 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held at length. The Secretary informed the Commission that Lot No 80, proposed for the C-2 Zone, is now Lot No 82 because of minor revisions in the -tract. The proposed zone change will remain the same in size. RESOLUTION NO 255 A Resolution of the City Planning, Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No '255 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO -ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 255 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 255 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: C-2: 1. The property is situated at the intersection of a major and a primary highway. .- 2.- The property is situated at.a mile intersection which is a more desirable location for a,commercial develop- ment. R-1: 1. There is a recorded final subdivision map on the sub- ject property that has been designed to meet the requirements for the R-1 district. 2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that are not compatible with single family residential development. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Let son, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. ABSTAINED: Crabb. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION To allow the Division'of Land of the DIVISION OF LAND: DV #168 following described parcel: Beginning Applicant - Laimbeer- O'Bryan Associates 300 ft north of Yorktown, at the end of England St., running north 198 ft and east 165 ft into four individual parcels. Located be- tween Florida Avenue and England Street, approximately 300 ft north of Yorktown Avenue. PARCEL I: The S'ly 198 ft of Block 2606 of the East Side Villa Tract, excepting therefrom the W!ly 165 ft, also excepting therefrom.the S'ly 150 ft, also excepting therefrom any portion of said land lying within the NIly one acre of said Block 2606. PARCEL II: The N 99 ft of the S'ly 198 ft of the W'ly 165 ft of Block 26b6 of the East Bide Villa Tract, excepting therefrom any portion of said land lying within the N'ly one acre of said Block 2606. PARCEL III: The N 492 ft of the S'ly 99 ft of the W'ly 165 ft of Block 2606 of East Side Villa Tract, excepting a portion of said land lying within the N'ly one acre of said Block 2606. PARCEL IV: The S 49z ft - 2 - 190 Page #3 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 of the Wily 165 ft of Block 2606 of East Side Villa Tract, ex- cepting a portion of said land lying within the NI1y one acre of said Block 2606. The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Phil O'Bryan,,applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the discrepancy in the plot plans. There being no.further comment, the hearing was.closed. Commission discussion was held. The_Planning Director pointed out that the applicant is ac- quiring property which is presently under two ownerships and intends to create four parcels. He further pointed out the reason for the variance is because the one parcel fronting on Florida Avenue is only 4,8 ft wide. It was noted that this parcel is not being'acquired by the applicant; it will -be a remaining parcel after the rear portion is purchased. It was further noted that, there are two parcels being created which are only 492 ft wide. The Planning Director pointed out that the applicant intends to extend England Street -after the proposed 4-plexes are built and intends to put the street improvements. It was noted that this alone does not give the property.access to an existing street. The one 66 ft strip of England Street on the parcel labled "Van Meter" apparently has not yet been dedicated and is not improved. The 6oncensus of the Commission was that the majority of the lots in the surrounding -area had 50. ft frontage. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF.DV #168 TO, THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Dedicate the right-of-way for England Street across parcels being created. 2. Improve England Street'to City Standards, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving. 3. Provide an adequate public street connection to an existing public street from the portion to be dedicated in.a manner meeting the approval of the City Engineer.' 4. Improve Florida Street to City Standards across Parcel I. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Letson,'Bazil, Kaufman ,"Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. ABSTAINED: Crabb.' THE MOTION CARRIED. - 3 - Page k4 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 191 UV 4431 - Continued To allow the construction of a Applicant - Michael Kolmatycky Beauty Salon within the proposed 15 unit apartment building in the R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. Located at the westerly corner•of Acacia Avenue and 6th Street and legally described as Lots 21, 23, 25, and 27, Block No 506, Main Street Section. The Secretary read a letter to the Commission submitted by the applicant requesting the approval of the subject variance. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.'. Commission discussion was held at length. It was noted that the applicant has revised his plot plans which will provide 13 dwel•ling units with 13 garages and two spaces provided for the proposed Beauty Salon, making a total of 15 parking spaces, as per plans. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE•UV #431.. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: - None . - ABSENT: •Worthy. ABSTAINED:. Crabb. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV #435 To allow a 16 ft rear yard set - Applicant - J. F. Deane back in deviation to the required 20 ft rear yard setback in the A-1-Y General Agricultural District on Lots 14, 53, and 57 and to allow a 15 ft rear yard setback in deviation to the required 20 ft rear yard setback on Lot 55, all lots being within Tract No 4496, Seahaven development. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was.held. The Planning Director pointed out that all lots involved in this variance are located on a cul-de-sac or a knuckle which creates irregular and somewhat shallower lots than usual. - A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #435. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES:- Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. - 4 - 192 Page #5 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 ABSENT: Worthy. ABSTAINED: Czabb. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE -VARIANCE: UV #436 To allow, the construction -of Applicant•- E. Ste, wart a veterinary clinic in the Hughes, D.V.M. C-4 Highway Commercial District. Located west of Beach Blvd. and approximately 600 ft north of Ellis Avenue, and -legally des- cribed as that portion of the N2 of the. SE 4 of the SE 4 of .the NE4 of Section 35-5-11. Further legal description on file in the Planning Department. Of•f ice,, , - - ­• - - • -� , • The Secretary read four let- ters of protest submitted by (1) C. K. Cole, (2) Paul,E. Plavan, (3) Ellen E Adams, (4) Frank H. Cole., The Staff report was read by the Secretary. _ The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr.. Esau T. Agajanian, La Tijers Station, Los Angeles, addressed the Commission and stated his opposition to the sub'- Ject variance. J. M. Greene,-18371 Pammy Lane, Huntington -Beach, also stated his protest. Wayne Flannery, Dan Brown., Mrs. C. K. Cole, all being property owners within the area.close to,the subject variance, protested vigorously. Mr. Herbert Porter, adjoining property owner spoke in favor --.of the proposal.: Mrs. Mary Reynolds, 222 Main Street, Huntington Beach, also favored the proposed veterinary clinic. E. Stewart,Hughes, applicant, addressed the Commission -and explained the proposed structures. He stated that veterinary clinic would not be classified as a dog kennel or boarding animals on the premises. The proposed building will have no windows and there will be two doors between the areas where animals are kept and the outside. The building will be - concrete block for sound conditioning and will be completely air conditioned. There being no further com- ment, the .hearing was. closed Commission discussion was held at length. The Planning Director pointed out that the property is situated in a relatively undeveloped area. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON.TO APPROVE USE -VARIANCE UV #436 WITH THE -FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: - 5 - Page #6 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 193 1. Practice shall be limited to the care of pets only. 2. There shall be no boarding of animals on the premises. 3. There shall be no pens, kennels, or runs outside of a building. 4. The building used for veterinary services to be fully en- closed and sound conditioned. 5. Curb, gutter,- sidewalk and paving shall be installed on Beach Blvd. 6. The size of spaces and arrangement of parking to be in accordance with Planning Commission standards. 7. ' There shall be double -doors constructed at'the rear entrance to sound -proof the building. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES:—Bazil, Letson, Kaufman, Miller, NOES: Stang. ABSENT: Worthy. ABSTAINED: Crabb. THE MOTION• CARRIED. The Chairman declared a 10 minute recess during which Commissioner David 0. Crabb, appointed by the Council on June 4, 1962, to the unexpired term of Mr-. Welch, was sworn,in by the City Clerk, Paul C. Jones. Commissioner Crabb assumed his duties as ;a member of the Planning Commission. AREA VARIANCE: AV #437 To allow the construction of a 6 ft Applicant - John W. Tolly fence to encroach to within 13 ft into the front yard setback in devia- tion to the required 20 ft front yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located approximately 130 ft north of Valencia Drive and east of Rotterdan•Lane, (Dutch Haven) also known as 17192.Ro-terdan Lane., Lot 105, Tract 3862. The Staff report was -read by the Secretary: The Ye aring was opened to the audience. John W. Tolly, applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor. There being no further comment, the _hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Planning Director pointed out that•the applicant is requesting a variance in order to construct a plywood divider 20 ft long and 6 ft high in the front yard which will act as a background for his landscaping. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #437. - 6 - 194Page #7 Minutes - H. B.'Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 ROLL CALL VOTE : • AYES:' Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Crabb, Chairman Stang.' NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy,, - THE MOTION CARRIED. The Commission -.discussed. whether or not this application would set a precedent for similar variances. It,was_the concensus that each case would.be_ considered on its own merits and that no.precedent is being established. USE VARIANCE: UV #438 To allow the -.construction of Applicant - Doyle & Shields a low density cluster -type residential development with private park -in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located approximately 200 ft north of Heil Avenue and west of Springdale Street and legally described as Lot..85,.Tract.No 3647 (Huntington Village.-) The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to •the audience. Larry -Shields, applicant addressed the Commission and explained the proposed multiple family development. Leon Ruderman,•architect, representing•Doyle-& Shields,.stated that the proposed plan is patterned -somewhat along the general concept of condominium development. . 1. - _ , . • Mildred Luddy, adjacent home-owner,.protested vigorously -to the proposal: Mr...Foizy and Robert Grant, nearby property owners; -also. stronglg opposed the subject variance. There being no further,com- ment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held at length. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO JUNE--19-, 1962. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller,•Crabb, Chairman Stang:•-. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 7 - Page #8 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 195 USE VARIANCE: UV #439 To allow the construction of a Applicant --Marcus D. Dodson decorative concrete block screen wall to encroach to within 14 ft of the front property line in deviation to the required 20 ft front yard setback in the R-1 Single•Family Residence District. Located in the northwest corner of Oxford Drive and Yorkshire Lane",and legally described as Lot 63, Tract No 3889, also known as 6861 Oxford Drive, Huntington Beach. The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Marcus D. Dodson, applicant, addressed the Commission and explained his plans. There being no -further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Planning Director pointed out that in this case a screen wall is proposed in order to provide some privacy for the residents. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #439. ROLL -CALL VOTE: AYES: Letson, Bazil", Kaufman, Miller, Crabb, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. - = THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #440 To allow the construction of a Aoplicant - Gavino Ortiz single family -residence in the M=1 Light Industrial District. .Located south of Washington Avenue and approximately 45 ft east of Lincoln Street, and legally described as Lot 14", Tract 179. The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; -there -being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held at length. The Planning Director pointed out that the property involved is located on the south side of Washington Street and is presently zoned M-1. It was the general concensus that the area should"be rezoned to R-1.' A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #440. ROLL'CALL VOTE AYES: Crabb, Letson,'Bazil, Kaufman, Miller,- Chairman Stang. 196Page #9 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION OF INTENT NO. 260 A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington,Beach-initiating a change of zone from M-1 to R-1 in the area of Washington Street. {'11A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF INTENT #260 AND THE SECRETARY-'WAS''INSTRUCTED TO ADVERTISE THE HEARING FOR JULY 3, 1962-. ; ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb•,•'Letson, Bdtil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy:' THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. - USE VARIANCE: UV #441 To allow an addition to be Applicant - constructed to existing Special 'Service ' Sui ply' Co. building in, the.,A--1-X General Agricultural District. Located west of Springdale Street and approximately 660 ft,south of Edinger Avenue, and legally described as the east.4.acres of the S 2 of the NE 4 of the NE 4 of Section 21-5-11.. - . The Staff report was read by the Secretary. -; • The hearing was opened to the audience. -Mr-. Potter,. 5921 Par Circle; Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated that he does not have objections to the subject variance as long as the recommended conditions are complied with. •• R. E. Morehouse, applicant, addressed the Commission and opposed Condition No. 3 regarding paving of an off-street parking for at least 60 cars. Frank Doyle., .831 ,So.- ,Man- chester, Anaheim, stated -that the applicant should clean up the whole parcel. Larry Shields, 831 So. Man- chester, Anaheim, asked that the applicant be required to put.in full street improvements plus a 5 ft wall along Springdale Street. There being no further comment, the hearing.was closed. The Planning Director stated that this application involves an addition to the front of two existing buildings where an existing sheet metal business is being conducted. 197 Page #10 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND'SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV:#441 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Dedicate the right-of-way for Springdale Street to 50 ft from centerline, except at the existing residence. 2. Install street improvements on Springdale to City Standards, including curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving. 3. Install -and -pave -an off-street parking area south of the existing buildings for at least 60 cars. 4. Pave the area in front of the buildings. 5. Dedicate as much right-of-way as possible in front of the existing residence. ROLL CALL VOTE:. ,. AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazi1, Kaufman, Mi11er;'Chairman Stang. NOES: None. . ABSENT.: - Worthy.: _ THE MOTION. CARRIED-. USE VARIANCE: UV #442 To allow the erection of a Applicant - ilacco Corp. double face subdivision direc- tional sign with a height of 57 ft and a length of 61 ft. Located on the north side of Adams Avenue, approximately 600 ft east of Cannery Street and legally described as Lot 1, Tract No 4493. The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Louis Stabile, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission offering to answer any questions and stated there was no objection to increasing the amount of the bond. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning.Director informed the Commission that the applicant is requesting a variance•in -order.to construct a,double face subdivision directional sign which stands 57 ft high and is 61 ft long: Commission discussion was held. A MOTION WA.S�, MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE ,USE VARIANCE UV : #442' WITH THE ' FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of this application -shall be for one year from the date of approval. 2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on or before the ex- piration of the approval and a $750 bond shall be posted guaranteeing such removal. If the sign is not removed as required, the City retains the right of entry for removal of the sign and the bond shall be forfeited and the full amount paid to the City Treasury. - 10 - Page #11 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 3. The bottom of the sign face shall be at least 10 ft above the centerline grade of -any street within 50 ft of the sign and the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed except for the necessary structural members.. 4. The sign shall be -removed at the,bwner's expense, upon 30 days notice,'if'such is necessary because of'stree`t widening. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb,,,Letspn, Be�zil,-Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: 'UV #443 Applicant - Macco Corp. To allow the. erection of- (1) double-f ace subdivision directional sign-1-5--ft x 60 ft and (2) single face subdivision directional sign 15 ft x 60 ft in the A-1-Y General Agricultural District. Located at the NE"-' corner of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue, and legally described as 60 ft east of •the west line and 20 ft north of the south line of the SW4 of Section 5-6-10. The Secretary read the Staff report. The hearing" was opened to' the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed out that two signs are included in this application and'both signs will advertise the Glen -Mar tract now under construction. A MOTION WAS•MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #443 WITH THE FOLLMING CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of this application shall be for one year from the date of approval. 2. The sign shall be"removed by,the owner on or before the expir- ation of the approval and a $250 bond shall.be posted,guaran- teeing such removal. If the sign is not removed as required, the City -retains the right -of -entry" for removal of "the "sign and the bond shall be forfeited and the full amount paid to the City Treasury. 3.• The bottom of the"sign face shall be at least 10 feet above the centerline grade of any street within 50 feet of the sign and the area under the sign shall.remain unobstructed except for., the necessary structural members. 4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30 days notice, if such is necessary because of street•widening. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman,.Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT; Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. 199 Page #12 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 AREA VARIANCE: AV #444 To allow the construction of an Applicant - Fernhill Homes attached garage to encroach to within 10 ft from the rear pro- perty line in deviation -to the required 15 ft rear yard set- back in the-R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located approximately 75 ft north of Loma Avenue "and east of Main- -Street and legally described as Lots 7 and 8, Block 1014, Wesley Park -Section, or 1210 Main Street, Huntington Beach. .-The Staff report was.read by the Secretary.. The hearing was opened -to the audience; there being -.no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning.Director pointed out that 10 ft from the alley is -about the.minimum that should be,considered since the alley is only 15 ft wide. He further stated that it appears that adequate rear yard.will remain at the side of the garage in this particular case. -A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #444. ROLL CALL VOTE:•- ,• AYES:" Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Miller, Bazil, Chairman Stang. NOES None. ABSENT: Worthy-. THE MOTION CARRIED. - USE PERMIT: UP #178 To allow an existing subdivision Applicant - Columbia directional sign 10 ft x 40 ft Outdoor•Advertising Co. to remain at -its present location for one year period. Located on the northwest corner of -Heil Avenue and -Beach Boulevard, and legally described as Lots 13 and 14, Block C, Tract,No 522. The. Staf f report -was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened•,to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director informed the Commission that this 'Location was involved in an appli- cation just a few weeks ago for a service station. He further stated that the application was approved and the applicant would start construction almost immediately. It was further noted that -the sign had been removed. A MOTION WAS.MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY. KAUFMAN TO DENY USE PERMIT UP #178.., ROLL CALL VOTE: - AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 12 - 200 Page #13 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 USE PERMIT: UP #179- To allow the existing subdivision Applicant -.Columbia-- 'directibrial' sign 1.0' ft'x 30 ft Outdoor Advertising Co. to remain at its present location for one year period. Located on the west side of Beach Boulevard and 150 ft north of •the ceriter- lineof McDonald•Street, and legally described as Lot' 116,' Tract 417. The Secretary read the Staff report. The hearing was opened to the audience;' there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director informed the Commission that this application is about 4 months late in being filed'sinee the original application (UP #118) expired February 21, 1962. He •further stated that the original appli- cation showed a setback of 6 ft from property •line but -the approval required a .20 ft* setback. This is 'sti"11 short of the present•'SO ft setback requirement:,.._ A MOTION WAS•MADE,BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 179 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • 1. The expiration date, of Use Permit #179 shall be February'21, 1963, and -no -further extension will be granted for this sign. 2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on or before the ex- piration of the approval and a $250 bond shall.be posted guaranteeing such removal. If the sign is not temoved-as required, the City retains the right of entry for.removal.of the sign and the bond shall be forfeited and the full amount paid to the City Treasury. 3. The bottom of the sign f ace shall be at least •10 feet above the centerline grade of any street w;.thin. 50 ;feet of. the,, - sign and the area under the sign shall remain'uiio59tructed except for the necessary structural members. 4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30, days notice, if such is necessary because of street widening. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy." THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP 7JA180 To allow the erection of a Applicant - Carter Sign Co. temporary subdivision direc-_. tional sign 10 ft x 20 ft and to allow a temporary sales office ;and model. -homes -in -.the R=1 . Single Family Residence District. Located approximately 440 ft north of Slater Avenue. -and east of Goldenwest Street and legally described as Lots 57, 585 59, and 60, Tract No 4329. The Staff report was read.by. the Secretary. The hearing was opened to`the audience. Pat Carter, applicant, addressed the Commission and - 13 - 201 Page #14 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 spoke in favor of granting the subject permit. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT UP #180'WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of this application shall be for one year from the date of approval. 2. The signs_hall­e removed by the owner on or before the expiration of the approval and a $250 bond shall be posted guaranteeing such removal._ If the sign is not removed as required, the City retains the right of entry for removal of the sign and' the bond shall be forfeited and the full amount paid to the City Treasury. 3. The bottom of,the_sign face shall be at least 10 feet above the centerline grade of any street within 50 feet of the sign and the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed except for the necessary structural members. 4. The sign shall be.removed at the owner's expense, upon 30 ,days'notice, if such is necessary because of street widening. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller,' Chairman Stang. NOES : • None . " ABSENT: Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP #181 To allow the erection of - -a temporary Applicant - Carter -Sign Co. subdivision directional sign 10 ft x 40 ft in the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District. Located approximately 500 ft north of Warner Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard- and .legally'described as Lots 27,•28, 29, 30, 31, and 32, Tract No 194. The Staff report was"read by the Secretary. ..:.The -hearing was -opened. to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE USE PERMIT UP #181,WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Approval of this application shall be for"one year from the date of approval. 2.' The sign shall -be removed by the owner on or before the expiration of the approval and, a�$250 bond shall be posted guaranteeing such removal.• If .the sign is not removed as required-, 't'he City retains the:right of entry, for -removal of the sign and the bond shall -be forfeited and ,the full amount paid to the City Treasury. 3. The bottom "of the sign face shall be at least 10 feet above the centerline grade of any street within 50 feet of the sign and - the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed - except for the necessary structural members. 4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30' days notice, if such is necessary because of street widening. 5. The sign shall set back 50 ft from the Beach Blvd. property line. - 14 - 202 Page #15 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None., ABSENT: Worthy THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP A82 To ­ allow the* erection -of' a Applicant - Carter Sign Co. temporary subdivision direc- tional sign 10 ft x 30 ft in the A-1-X General Agricultural District. Located approximately 230 ft east,of.Goldenwest Street and north of Warner -Avenue and legally described as Lots 31 and 32, Tract -No 392. The Secretary read the Staff - report. _.. The hearing was opened to the audience;,there being no comment; the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE USE PERMIT UP #182 WITH THE FOLLOWING' CONDITIONS :- 1. Approval of this application shall be for one year,from.the date of approval. 2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on or before the ex- piration of the approval and a $250 bond -shall,be posted guaranteeing such removal. If the sign is not removed as required, the,City retains -the right of entry for- removal of the sign and the bond shall be, forfeited and the full: ' amount paid to the City Treasury.` 3. The bottom of 'the sign fate shall be at least 10 feet above the centerline grade of any_ street . within 50 feet of the.,, sign and the area under the sign shall remain_ unobstructed except for the necessary structural members. 4. The sign shall be removed -at tfie owner's expense, upon'30 days notice, if such is necessary because of street widening. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb,:.Letson, Bazi-1,,Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None-. -,. ABSENT: Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT:,. UP, #18.3 To allow, the erection of a Applicant - Carter Sign Co. temporary subdivision-diiect•- ional sign. 10. ft- x. 40- ft in the C=1 Neighborhood Commercial District. 'Located 'approximately 142 ft north of -Cypress• Street .and west. of Beach Boulevard and legally described as •the `soutti�`48 ft of Lot 3, Tract No. 436. A Letter of protest submitted by Blackburn-LaRue-was'read by the Secretary. {' The Secretary also read the Staff report. - 15 - 203 Page #16 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962. The hearing was opened to the audience., Pat Carter, applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor.. I- • • - Cap•Blackburn, realtor•,-addressed the Commission, and opposed the sign,structure stating that the Blackburn -LaRue,- Inc, are -anticipating within 90 days to begin construction o£,a two-story.,Professional and.Office Building. He further stated that the -.proposed sign would completely obstruct the view=of-the proposed building -to northbound traffic. It was further noted that the preliminary plans of the proposed Professional building -call for a setback of approximately 70 ft. The proposed subdivision directional sign, if approved, will be erected 50 ft, therefore, obscurring the view of,the building. George Tintle, representing the Carter Sign'Co., opposed moving the sign any further back than the required 50 ft setback from Beach Boulevard. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE.BY'LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE USE PERMIT UP #183 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The expiration date of approval shall be December 5, 1962) and no further extension shall be granted. 2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on or before the expiration of the approval and a $250 bond shall be posted guaranteeing such removal. If the sign is not removed as required, the City retains the right of entry for removal of the sign and the bond shall be forfeited and the full amount paid to the City Treasury. 3. The bottom of the sign face shall be at least 10 feet above the centerline grade of any street within 50 feet of the sign and the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed except for the necessary structural members. 4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30 days notice, if such is necessary because of street widening. 5. The sign shall set back 50 ft from the Beach Blvd. property line. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Worthy. THE MOTION CARRIED. DISCUSSION: The Planning Director presented to the Commission plans of a proposed tire shop within the C-1 Zone and requested an interpretation as to whether this use is similar to the uses allowed in the C-1 Zone. If so interpreted and concurred with by the Council, the use would be allowed. - 16 - .204 Page rl7 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, June 5, 1962 The proposed business will be selling tires,.shoek absorbers and brakes which are to be installed on the'premises. It was noted that the location,on'the-west'aide of Beach Boulevard just north:of Warner Avenue adjoins a service station which'dbes-similar'work., 'It was moved by Bazil, seconded by Letson that -the Commission find that the proposed-xetail�tire shop at .this• -location is- similar • to- -other C--1- Zone uses-. and . recommended to•the Council that this interpretation be approved. ROLL CALL VOTE:, -- AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman; Miller, Chairman -Stang. NOES: None ABSENT: Worthy, THE MOTION CARRIED. THERE -BEING, -NO FURTHER`BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED-.- W. C. Warner- Edward Stan Secretary Chairman - 17 -