HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-06-19205
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY, JUNE 19th, 1962
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Bazil, Chair-
man Stang.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
MINUTES: On motion by Kaufman and seconded by
Letson, the Minutes of the Huntington
Beach Planning Commission of May 31, 1962, and June 5, 1962,
were accepted as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary.
USE VARIANCE: UV #438 - Continued To allow the construction
ADplicant - Doyle & Shields of a low density cluster -
type residential develop-
ment with private park in the R-1 Single Family Residence
District. Located approximately 200 ft north of Heil Avenue
and west of Springdale Street and legally described as Lot 85,
Tract No 3647 (Huntington Village).
The Secretary read a
letter submitted by: -Doyle & Shields requesting that the subject
variance be postponed to August 7, 196Z.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO CONTINUE THE HEARING OF USE
VARIANCE #438 TO,AUGUST 7, 1962.
ROLL CALL VOTE:.
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Bazil, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3850 - ZEVISED
Number of Lots: 331 Subdivider: A. L. 3indlinj
Total Acreage: 65.1 Engineer: Millet, King ., Assoc.
Located at the northwest corner of
Springdale Street and the U. S. Navy Railroad R/W, and legally
described as being a portion of Section 9-5-11 SBB & M.
The Subdivision Committee Report was
read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the audience;
there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED
BY BAZIL TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3850 WITH THE FOL-
LOWING CONDITIONS:
206
Page #2
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
June 19, 1962
1. The revised Tentative Map dated June 11, 1962, shall be the
approved tentative map.
2. Mint Lane shall be extended to intersect Harold Place at
Hammon Street.
3. The 10 ft walk to the school site shall be improved to City
Standards including a 6 ft masonry wall on each side except
along the front yard of abutting lots where such wall shall
not exceed 32 ft in height, nor be less than 2 ft in height.
4. No portion of the tract shall be recorded over the existing
Graham Street until said Street has been abandoned.
5. All Standard Subdivision Requirements that are applicable
shall be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Bazil, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT:' Worthy, Miller,
THE MOTION CARRIED.
'TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4707 - REVISED
Number of Lots: 525 Subdivider: Macco Realty Co.
Total Acreage: 131.4 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc. -
Located at the northeast corner of
Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue and legally described as a
portion of the S 2 of Section 5-6-10.
The Secretary read the Sub-
division Committee Report..
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Kenneth Carlson,. representing the subdivider,
addressed the Commission and asked for continuance to the
July 3, 1962, regular Planning Commission meeting..
There being no further
comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL
AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO JULY 3, 1962.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Bazil, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4708 - REVISED
Number of Lots: 322 Subdivider: Macco Realty Co.
Total Acreage: 69.3 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc.
Located at the southwest
corner of Garfield Avenue and Ward Street and legally described
as being a portion of the E2 of the NW-4 of Section 5-6-10.
The Subdivision Committee
Report was read by the Secretary.
- 2 -
207
Page .#3
Minutes - H. B. Plannin- Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962 '
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mr. Dolan, Acting Superintendent of Fountain
Valley School District, addressed the Commission and
requested street frontage on the east side of the proposed
school site for the purpose of loading and unloading children.
Kenneth Carlson, representing the
applicant, stated that Yorktown Street, a secondary highway,
does,not cross the river; therefore, it would not generate
any traffic from the east.
Sterling White, representing the
subdivider, stated that the property is under"three different
ownerships; thus creating definite problems of design. In
view of these design problems, he requested a continuance to
the July 3, 1962, regular Planning Commission meeting.
There being no further comment, the
hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO -CONTINUE THE HEARING TO JULY 3, 1962.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION.CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4743 f.EVISED
Number of Lots: 178 Subdivider-: South Shores Homes
Total Acreage: 38.4 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc.
Located at the northwest corner of
Yorktown Street and Bushard Street and legally described as
being a portion of the SE4 of the NW4 of Section 6-6-10.
The Subdivision Committee Report was
read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the audience.
Mr. Dolan, representing the Fountain Valley School District,
asked whether or not a 10 ft walkway easement was provided
over the Orange County Flood Control District Right -of -Way.
The Secretary pointed out that the
easement across the Orange County Flood Control Right -of -Way
was indicated on the tract map.
Assistant City Engineer, Bill Hartge,
requested that a condition be added requiring improvement across
the Orange County Flood Control Right -of -Way which would com-
ply with City Standards.
There being no further comment, the
hearing was closed.
- 3 -
208Page #4 -
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19,'1962
Commission discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4743 UPON
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The revised layout dated June 15, 1962, shall -be the approved
map.
2. A 6 ft chain link type fence shall be constructed along the
Edison Co. right-of-way and Flood Control right-of-way.
3. The improvement of "A" Drive, "K" Lane and Bushard Street
shall include the parcel labled "Not a Part."
41 Bushard Street shall be improved to City Standards across
the Edison Co. and Flood Control Channel right-of-way.
5. A walkway and pedestrian bridge across the Flood Control
Channel shall be provided near the northwest corner of the
tract and a masonry wall 6 ft high shall be constructed
along each side of the walk except where abutting the front
yards'of adjoining lots where such wall shall not exceed
42 inches.
6. The rear and exterior side of all reverse corner lots shall
be fenced with a 6 ft masonry wall in accordance with
Planning Commission Standards.
7. No portion of this tract shall be recorded until such time
.as further approval by the Planning Commission is secured
certifying that a solution has been found to the problem of
a public health hazard due to irrigation of nearby farm lands
with sewer effluent.
8. All standard subdivision requirements shall be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Bazil, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy,'Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4744
Number of Lots: 314 Subdivider: South Shores Homes
Total Acreage: 69.6 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc.
Located at the southeast
corner of Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street and legally de-
scribed as being a portion of the WZ of the NE4 of Section
6-6-10.
The Secretary read the Sub-
division Committee report.
The, hearing was opened
to the audience. Mr. Dolan, representing -the Fountain Valley,
School District, addressed the Commission and requested pro-
vision for a 7.5 acre school site.
There being no further com-
ment, the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was held.
- 4 -
209
Page #5
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY.LETSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE -TRACT MAP NO 4744
UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The layout dated May 24, 1962, shall.be the approved map.
2. A 6 ft chain link type fence shall be constructed along
the Edison Co. R/W and Flood Control Channel.
3. Bushard St. shall be improved to City.Standards across the
Edison Co. and Flood Control Channel rights -of -way.
4. The dedication of Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street shall
include the parcel designated "Not a Part."
5. The cul-de-sacs along Yorktown Avenue shall be extended to
10 ft from Yorktown.
6. Lots 145-155 shall be deleted for a future school site.
7. No portion of this tract shall be recorded until such time
as further approval by the Planning Commission'is secured
certifying that a solution has been found to the problem of
a public health hazard due to irrigation of nearby farm
lands with sewer effluent.
8. All standard subdivision requirements shall be complied
with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4746 - REVISED
Number of Lots: 90 Subdivider: Doyle 6: Shields
Total Acreage: 20 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc.
Located at the southeast corner
of Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street and -legally described
as being a portion of the W2 of the NE4 of Section 6-6-10.
The Subdivision Committee Report'
was read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Kenneth Carlson, representing the subdivider,
stated that he was opposed to the requirement of extending "A"
Drive to within 10 ft of Edwards St.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed. .
Commission discussion was held.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4746 UPON
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The Tentative Tract Map designated as "Revised June 13,
1962" shall be the approved layout.
2. All Standard Subdivision Requirements shall be complied with.
- 5 -
210
Pale #6
Minutes - H. 3. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller. -
THE MOTION CARRIED —
USE VARIANCE: UV #445 To Allow the construction of
Applicant Lawrence E-. Gates a convalescent -hospital in
the R-2 Two Family Residence
District. Located.on the north side of Garfield Avenue and
approximately 150 ft� west of Delaware Street and legally described
as Lot 13, Block G, Tract No. 7.
-The Staff report was read by
the Secretary.
- The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. -
Commission discussion was held
at length.
The Secretary pointed out that
the proposed convalescent hospital is in close=proximity to R-3.
and R-5 zones which permit convalescent hospitals by.special
permits, and the intended use will front -on a primary•,highway,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL
AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE -VARIANCE #445, WITH -THE
FOLLOWING - CONDITIONS:
1. Dedication of Garfield Avenue to Primary Highway Standards.
2. Installation to City specif ications_of curb, gutter, sidewalk,
and paving to the centerline of Garfield Avenue,
3. Redesign of the parking layout in order to provide a minimum
of two parking bays at the front of the -building.
4. Widen the indicated 15 ft drive to 25 ft and provide a sign
which indicates additional parking to the rear.
5. The size and arrangement of parking stalls will conform to
Commission standards.
6. A minimum of 5% of the parking lot shall be landscaped and
shall be permanently maintained.
7. A 6 ft high masonry wall shall be constructed on the north,
east and west property lines, excepting the front 15 ft on
the east -and west property lines, which shall be 421"'high.
8. There shall be one parking space for each bed..
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb; Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.-
- 6 -
211
Page #7
Minutes - H. B. Plannincy Commission
Tuesday, June_-19, 1962
AREA VARIANCE: AV ,f445 To allow the construction of a
Ap?:)licant - Signal Oil Co,. service "station with two individual
20 ft x 22 ft free standing cano-
pies over the pump islands to encroach into'the required 50 ft
front yard setback in the C=4 Highway Commercial District.
Located at the northwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Edwards
Street and legally described as the south 185 ft of the east
177 ft of the SW4 of Section•15-5-11 in the Rancho Bolsa Chica.
The Secretary read the Staff report.
The -hearing was opened to -the
audience: John Prins from.Robert-H. Grant Company addressed
the Commission and spoke in favor of the subject variance.
Lawrence W. Weaver, representing
the.Signal Oil Co., addressed the Commission and spoke in favor.
He stated -that the canopies will not obstruct the view at the
intersection.
There being no other comment, the
'hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held.
The Secretary pointed out -that the
applicant'is requesting permission to encroach into the required
50-ft setback with two 20 ft x 22 ft free standing canopies
and a service station building. It was further noted that
encroachment within the required 50 ft setback does not meet
wl•th the Code or with Commission policy.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
-SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE #446 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The canopies and service station building shall not be
included in the approval.
2. All other provisions of the C-4 Zone shall be met.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE. VAR IANCE: UV 1r'447 To conduct a general building
Applicant - $ay Ready Miz=. Inc. material business and ready
mix concrete business and to
allow the construction of storage sheds, office, garage, rest
rooms and ready mix concrete plant in the M-1 Light Industrial
District. Located east of Bushard Street and approximately
600 ft south of Hamilton Avenue and legally described as the S2
of the NW4 of the SE4 of Section 18-6-10 SBB & M, and all of
Lot 10, containing 19.54 acres.
21-22age r 8
IMinutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
The Secretary rpad.a_letter of
protest submitted by,the Costa,Mesa County Water District,
The Staff report was read by the
Secretary. It was noted that on,June 4, 1962, Bay Ready Mix, Inc.
requested withdrawal of their application, -UV #384•, due.to a re-
vision in their plot plan. Since then a -new application has been
submitted -which is similar -except -for a reduction in rear and side
yard setback from- ' 150. f t. to_ 125 . f t .
. -. The hearing was opened to the
audience. Dale Heinly, representing Nova Homes, addressed the
Commission and stated -his opposition. He also questioned the
validity of the application because a local realtor has an ex-
clusive listing on.the subject.property.
Attorney for .Mr . Harold F.-
Craig addressed the Commission and protested vigorously to the
subject variance.
r, ; . L. E. Sprague, applicant,
addressed the Commission and presented photographs of the subject
property. The Commission asked Mr. Sprague if he was authorized
to file the application. He stated that a,representative of his
firm was authorized; however, this representative was -not at the
meeting.
The hearing was closed.- Com-
mission discussion was held regarding the clouded application,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO DENY USE VARIANCE #447 WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
ROLL CALL VOTE: I -
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang. -
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED. -
AicEA VARIANCE: ' AV '#448 To allow the' construction of a
Applicant - S. K. Johnson two car garage to -encroach to
within''7 ft 6 inches of the'
rear property line in deviation to the required"15 ft rear yard
setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located at
the southwest corner of Malloy Drive and Londonderry Lane and
legally described as Lot 40, Tract No 4114, known as 8212 Malloy
Drive, Huntington Beach.
The Staff report was read by
the Secretary.- - '
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mr. Kenneth Johnson, applicant, addressed the Com-
mission and spoke in favor of the -subject variance.
213
Page ;r`9
Minutes - H. B. Plannin Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
The Secretary pointed out that the
applicant's property backs on a 20 ft alley. It was further
noted that the plot plan indicates an 18-ft x 20 ft-garage
which would receive access from the alley; furthermore, the
plot plan indicates an offset to the west which would project
into a swimming pool now under construotion."
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE AREA -VARIANCE #448 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The garage door shall have a -net opening of 18 ft.
2. The west wall of the garage shall be on a line with the
west wall of the main structure.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT:- Worthy, Miller..
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE VARIANCE:, UV #449 To allow the construction of a
-Applicant --Tropicana Apts. sign 2 ft x 15 ft in the R-4-0
Multiple Family Residence District.
Located at the northwest corner of 10th Street and Walnut Ave.
and legally described as Lots 1,.3, 5, 7, 9, and 11, Block 210,
Huntington Beach Tract.
The Secretary read a letter of
protest submitted by Mrs. Dorcas Davis de Jong, 387 Monterey
Drive, Laguna Beach, Calif.
The Staff report was read by the
Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience.
Mr. Barnum, applicant, addressed
the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed sign.
There being no other comment, the
hearing was closed.
The Secretary,pointed out that the
applicant is seeking permission to construct a 2 ft x 15 ft
sign in the R-4-0 District which will advertise "Weekly
Family Rates." It was further noted that in his petition the
applicant refers to the present'use of his property as an
"Apartment Motel."
The Secretary stated that in the
R-4-0 zone business uses are not allowed.
- 9 -
214.
Page #10
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
•A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE-#449 WITH THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
1. Approval -of this application shall-ber:for three months from the
date of approval, and no further extension-will_be granted for
this sign.
2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on`or before the ex-
piration of the approval and a $100 bond shall be posted
guaranteeing such removal. ,If the sign is not removed as re-
quired, the City' retains the right of entry•f or removal of
the sign and -the bond shall be forfeited and the full amount
paid to the City Treasury.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 256
Applicant - Macco Corp.
CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to
proposed change of.district
boundary and use classifica-
tion from: R-4-Y Suburban Residential District, as adopted by
Interim Ordinance No 672, to R-1 Single Family Residence District.
The following parcel of real property as submitted on the
Applicant's petition -is described herewith: Located at the north-
east corner of Adams Avenue and Cannery Street and legally
described as Lots 1 thru 84, 86, and 87, Tract No 449.3.-
The Secretary read the•Staff
report.
The hearing.was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the•hearing was closed•. .
The Secretary pointed out that
the applicant is requesting a change of zone to R-1 for all lots
presently -zoned R-4-Y within Tract No 4493. He further stated
that this tract is being developed into single family homes.
RESOLUTION NO 256 • A Resolution of the -City
AND
Planning Commission Recom-
mending Approval of Zone Case
No 256 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
SECONDED BY LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 256 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 256 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE .
FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. There is a recorded final subdivision map, Tract 4493, on the
subject property that has been designed to meet the require-
ments of the R-1 Zone.
2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any•uses that are•not
compatible with single family residential development.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
11
- 10 -
Page #11
.linutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
215
-ZCNE CASE NO 257. CHANGE OF ZONE relative to pro -
Applicant - Lutheran Church. posed change of district boundary
and use classification from: R-1
Single Family Residence District to R-3 Limited Multiple Family
Residence District. The -following parcel of real property as
submitted on -the applicant's petition is described herewith:
Located -south -of Heil Avenue and approximately 380 ft east
of Bolsa Chica Street -and legally described as that portion of
Section 21-5-11, described as follows: BEGINNING at the NE
corner of the NW4 of the NW-4 of the SW4 of Section-21-5-11;
thence S. 0041135"-E 660.51 ft; thence S 89036, W. 333.20 ft;
thence N 004014811-W.,451.71 ft; thence-S 89°35130" W 40.37 ft;
thence N 0040,4211 W. 208.71 ft; thence N 89035130/1 E 373.22 ft
to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the N 208.71 ft
of the-W'ly•121.37-ft:
The Staff report was read by the
Secretary.
The -hearing was opened.to the
audience. Roger Slates, representing the applicant, addressed
the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed church site.
Howard•Miller,•5181 Heil•Avenue, Huntington Beach, addressed
the Commission and stated that he was not opposing the proposed
church and parish school;. however, he was opposed to an R-3
Zone which would allow apartment -development adjacent to
single family development.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 257 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Recommendin-, Denial of
Zone Case No 257-without Prejudice
to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 257 RECOMMENDING
DENIAL OF -ZONE CASE NO 257 WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND TO ALLOW A
VARIANCE TO BE FILED WITH THE FEE WAIVED.FOR THE FOLLOWING
REASON.:
1. Many of the uses permitted in the R-3 District are not
compatible with the present development in the area.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
. 216 gage #12
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
ZONE CASE NO 258 CHANGE OF ZONE, relative to pro -
Applicant - Tony Luis posed change of-district'boundary
and use classification from:
R-4-X Suburban Residential District, as adopted by Interim
Ordinance No 668, to C-2 Community Business.District with setback
provisions. The following parcel of real property, -as -submitted
on the applicant's petition is described herewith:, Located at
the northwest corner of Taylor Avenue and Beach Boulevard and
legally described as the S 2 of .the SE 4 of the NE4 of the NE 4 of
Section-35-5-11.
The Secretary read the.Staff
report: He commented on the pattern of zoning south of the
subject property which -could have equal application in this
particular case,
The hearing .was .opened to the
audience. The applicant addressed the Commission and stated
that he was seeking a zone change because Groth Chevrolet in-
tends to locate at this corner.
the hearing was closed.
There :being .no further .comment.,
Commission discussion was held.
It was noted that the subject
property is fronting on a major arterial highway and also ad-
joins a C-2 Zone to the south.
RESOLUTION NO 258 A Resolution of the City Plan-
ning Commission Makin; Recom-
mendation of Approval of Zone
Case No 258 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 258 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE.CASE NO 258 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOL-
LOWING REASONS -.AND UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The property -is fronting on a major arterial highway.
2. The property is adjoining a C-2 zone located to the south.
CONDITIONS 'c
1: Withhold second reading of the adopting ordinance until the
right-of-way for Taylor Avenue is dedicated to City Standards.
2. No -final notice of completion be issued 'by the Building De-
partment until the installation of curbs, gutters and street
drainage is in full compliance with City of Huntington Beach
street standards, or until with the consent of -the City
Engineer, an agreement is entered into with the City in
accordance with an accepted plan of improvements. In the
event an agreement for the improvements is entered into, the
City Council may require that the agreement be secured by a
good and sufficient bond, or it may accept in liet} thereof,
a cash deposit which bond or cash deposit shall be in an
amount equal to the cost of the improvements estimated by
the City Engineer.
- 12 -
Palle r13
217
Minutes-- H. B. Plannin, Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1952
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None . - . .
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE RESOLUTION -WAS ADOPTED.
CASE- NO 259; CHANGE OF ZONE,, relative to
Anoli.cant - - Richard J,. - Dach proposed .change of district
- .,.-boundary and -use classification
from: M-1-A Restricted Manufacturing District to C-2 Com-
munity Business District. The following parcel of real pro-
perty as submitted on the applicant's petition is described
herewith: Located at the northwest. -corner of Banning Avenue
and Bushard Street and legally described as the SW-4-of the SE4
of the SW4 of Section 18-6-10 SBB & M.-
The Staff report was read by the
Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, it was. closed. .
Commission discussion was held.
The Secretary pointed out that
the -area has been planned and is zoned -for industrial use.
RESOLUTION NO 259 A Resolution OF the City Plannin-
Commission Recommending Denial
of Zone Case No 259 . -
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 259 RECOMMENDING
DENIAL OF ZONE CASE NO 259 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1•. -The property is situated at the intersection of two
secondary highways.
2. The area has been planned and is zoned for industrial use.
3. Tract 3903, consisting of 297 lots and 63.29 acres, is
presently under construction and will be the -only -supporting
residential development in,the area.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
USE PERMIT: UP #184 To allow the erection of a
Applicant-- Columbia double face subdivision directional
Outdoor Advertisin Co. sign 10 ft x 40 ft in the C-2
Community Business District.
Located on the south side of Edinger Avenue and approximately
160 ft west of Springdale Street and legally described as Lot
95, Tract No 3643.
- 13 -
218Pa3e #14
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
The Secretary read the Staff
report..
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, it was closed.
The Secretary pointed out
that this 10 ft x•40 ft subdivision sign has been erected and is
effectively blocking an existing Standard Station.from the -'.view
of eastbound motorists along Edinger Avenue.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO•DENY USE PERMIT #184.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazi1, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller:•
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP #185 To allow three existing double
Applicant --Columbia face subdivision directional
Outdoor Advertising Co. signs- all - 10' ft- x 30 ft-to-
remain at their present lo-
cation for one year -period.. Located (sign 1 and 2) northeast
corner of Springdale Street'- and• Edinger- Avenue•; and' (sign 3)-
southeast corner of BOlsa'and-Springdale Street, and legally
described as Tract No 3848.
The Secretary read the Staff
report. 1 . • - .
The hearing was opened to
the audience; there being.no comment, the hearing was -closed.
Commission discussion was
held at length.
The Secretary informed the
Commission that the applicant is requesting a continuance for
three existing double-faceddirebti6nal signs, located on Tracts
3847 and 3848.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 185 UPON -THE FOL-
LOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Expiration of the approval of this application shall be
May 2; 1963.-,
2. The sign shall be removed by the owner -on or. -before the
expiration of the approval and a $250 bond shall be posted
guaranteeing such removal. If the sign is not removed as
required, the City retains the right of entry for removal
of the sign and the bond shall be forfeited and the full
amount paid to the City Treasury.
3. The bottom of the sign face shall be at least 10 feet above
the center line grade of any street within 50 feet of the
sign and the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed
except for the necessary structural members.
- 14 -
219
Page #�15
Minutes - H. B. Plannin Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30
days notice, if such is
necessary because of street
widening`
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Kaufman, Letson, Bazil, Chairman'Stang.'
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller-.
=
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT: UP 7r186
To allow the existing subdivision
Applicant - Columbia
directional sign 10 ft x 40 ft
Outdoor Advertisinsz Co.
to remain at its present location
for one year period. Located
east of Beach Boulevard and
approximately`400 ft south of
Garfield, and legally describedas 400 ft south of the north
line and 75 east of the west
line of the NW4 of the NW4 of
Section 1-6-11.
The Staff report was read by
the Secretary.
The - he aring -was opened to the
aidience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
The Secretary pointed out to the
Commission that the applicant is requesting a continuance on
an existing subdivision sign located approximately 400 ft south
of Garfield and on the east side of Beach Boulevard. He
further pointed out that the existing sign has less than a 50
ft setback from Beach Boulevard._•,Originally,, the.application
was approved May 2, 1961, with Standard Conditions.•
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND -
SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 186 WITH,THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Expiration of the approval of this application shall be
May 2, 1963.
2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on or before the
expiration of the approval and a $250 bond shall be posted
guaranteeing such'removal. If the sign is'not removed as
required, the City retains the right of entry for removal
of the sign and the bond shall be forfeited' and the full
amount paid to the City Treasury.
3. The bottom of the sign face shall be at least 10 feet above
the centerline grade of any street within 50 feet of the
sign and the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed
except for the necessary'structural members.
4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30
days notice, if such is necessary because of street
widening.
5. No further extension for this sign if less than 50 feet
from Beach Boulevard.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
- 15 -
220Page #16
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
USE PERMIT: UP #187 To -allow the construction.of
Applicant - Lloyd A. Mannes a professional and commercial
building including.a beer tavern
in the- C-4 Highway. -Commercial. District ., Located east of Edwards
Street and approximately 249 ft south of the centerline,of Bolsa
Avenue and legally described as a portion of -the NE4 of Section
15-5-11 in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica. Further legal description
on file in the Planning Department Office.
The Secretary read the Staff
report. - - The hearing was opened to
the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was
held at length. - . .
The Secretary informed the
Commission that all requirements have been met with the exception
of the parking arrangement and the construction of.a block wall
along the rear property.line.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL
AM SECONDED -BY KAUFMAN..TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 187 WITH THE
BELLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Construction of a- block wall ,along that portion of the pro-
perty abutting an R District.
2. All required parking shall conform to Commission standards.
3. The substandard parking spaces for employees, as shown on the
plot plan, shall be reserved and-sd'indicated for employee
parking.
4. All assessment fees shall be paid.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: Letson.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION -CARRIED:
USE PERMIT: 'UP #188 To allow the erection of a
Applicant - Carter Sign Co. subdivision directional sign
10' ft x 25 ft 'in the M-1-A
Restricted Manufacturing District._ Located west of Brookhurst
Street and approximately 280 ft south of Hamilton Avenue and
legally described'as a portion of the Nz,of, the SE4 of, Section
18-6-10 SBB & M.
The hearing was opened to
the audience; there being no comment, it was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO.188 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
- 16 -
Page #17
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
221
1. Approval of this application shall be for one year from- -
the date of approval.
2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on or before the
expiration of the approval and a $250 bond shall be posted
guaranteeing such removal. If the sign is not removed as
required, the City retains the right of entry for removal of
the sign and the bond shall be forfeited and the full amount
paid to the,City Treasury.
3. The bottom of the sign face shall be at least 10 feet above
the centerline grade of any street within 50 feet of the
sign and the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed
except for the necessary structural members.
4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30
days notice, if such is necessary because of street
widening.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION 'CARRIED.
USE Pi 'M.=: UP iA89 To allow the' erection of a
Applicant'- Carter Sign Co. subdivision sign 10 ft x 25 ft
in the A-1-Y General Agricultural
`District. Located west of the Santa Ana River and on the north
side of Adams Avenue and legally described as that portion of
Section 5-6-10 SBB'& M. Further legal description on file in
the Planning Department Office.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY IKAUFMAN'
AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO'189 WITH'THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Approval of this application shall be for one year from the
date -of approval.-
2. The sign shall be removed by the owner on or -before -the
expiration of the approval -and a $250 bond shall be posted
guaranteeing such removal. If the sign is not removed as
required,.the City retains the right of entry for removal
of the sign and the bond shall be forfeited and the full
amount paid to the City Treasury.
3. The bottom of the sign face shall be at least 10 feet above
the centerline'grade -of any street -within 50 feet of the
sign and the area under the sign shall remain unobstructed
except for the necessary structural members.
4. The sign shall be removed at the owner's expense, upon 30
days notice, -if such is'necessary because of street
widening.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
- 17 -
222Page #18
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962
USE PERMIT: UP #190 To alhow- the .construction of. a
Applicant - Carter Sign Co. subdivision directional sign
10 ft x- 40 ft -in the R-4-X
Suburban Residential District, as adopted.by Interim.Ordinance
No 668, to encroach to within 20 ft-from the front property.line
in deviation to the required 50 ft, front yard -setback on Beach
Boulevard. Located at. the NW corner of Garfield. - Avenue , and. Beach
Boulevard and -legally described as Tract No 7,•Block H, Lot 18.
The Staff report ,_was_ .read by
the Secretary,... The pointed out that the, applicant received,
initial approval for the erection of this sign on May 1, 1962,
subject to the five standard conditions. Following this action,
the sign was erected in violation to Condition 5 -- "The Sign
shall set back 50 ft from the Beach Boulevard property line."
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Pat Carter, applicant, addressed the Commission and
stated that the existing sign was staked out prior to approval of
Use Permit #170; therefore, the sign was located within 20 ft of
the property Line.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO DENY USE PERMIT #190.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT,: UP #191 To allow the construction of a
Applicant - I:oppe & Smith trailer park in the R-5,Pro-
fessi6nal Business District., Located west of Bushard Street and
north of the OCFCD and legally described as a portion of the S2
of the NW-4 of Section 19-6-10 in -the Rancho Las Bolsas. Further
legal.descr.iption on -file in the Planning Department Office.
The Staff report was read by the
Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience.
Evan Koppe,,applicant, addressed
the Commission and offered to answer any questions.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
The Secretary pointed out that
the proposed trailer park is adjacent to a single family develop-
ment presently under construction. The land north of Bushard St.
and east of Brookhurst is zoned M-1-A. South of the subject
property there are two parcels under one ownership, approximately
70 acres, zoned R-5.
Pa-e 7f1p,
~Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 1962 T
223
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN
AND`SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 191 SUBJECT
TO ALL PROVISIONS OF SECTION 9391.21 HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE. PERMIT: UP YF192 To permit the construction of
Applicant - Richfield -Oil a service station, a plastic
Corporation sign less than 100 sq ft in
area, 20 ft in height, with
part of the',sign encroaching into the parkway area, electro-
liers, pump islands within the -setback area, and the construc-
tion of a 24 ft x 45 ft canopy within the 50 ft setback area
on Bolsa Chica Street. Located at the SE corner of Heil
Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street and legally described as follows:
Commencing from the NW corner of the NW-4 of the NW4 of
the SW4 of said Section 21-5-11; running thence E 208.71 ft;
thence S 208.71 ft; thence W 208.71 ft; thence N 208.71 ft to
the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the S'Iy 37.00
ft and the E l ly 20.00' ft .
The Secretary read the Staff
report.
The hearing was 'opened to the
audience.
Mr. M. R. McKinney, Jr.', addressed
the Commission and displayed various sketches of the proposed
service station.
Mr. Al Richardson, attorney,
representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and .spoke
in favor of the proposed use permit.
There . being rio ,other -Comment,
the hearing was -closed.
Commission discussion was held
at length.
The Secretary pointed out that
the construction of service station, its signs, electroliers,
and pump islands meet with C-4 requirements. However, the
construction of a canopy which, in e<fect, is a part of the
main building, does not meet with the Code nor with Commission
policy.
- 19 -
224Pa;e # 2 0
Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, June 19, 19b2
4!
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 192 WITH THE FOL-
LOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The canopy shall not be included in the approval.
2. All other provisions of the C-4 zone shall be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:,
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION: The Commission held a dis-
cussion regarding the .lo-
cation of service station canopies in the front setback area.
The Commission instructed the Staff to conduct a study and
submit a report -regarding the service station canopies on
July 3, 1962.
PROGRESS REPORT - LOT SIZE STUDY C0'111IITTEE
The Secretary read a memorandum
from the City Attorney pertaining to a moratorium on tentative
maps. The Commission.held a lengthy discussion with members of
the audience.. Attorney Dale Heinly, representing the Nova Homes,
addressed the Commission and commented on various court'cases
and the legal aspects of large lot zoning.
Jack Randall, Field Service
Director, representing the Home Builders Association, addressed
the Commission and commented on various problems associated
pith large lot zoning. He suggested a meeting between the Com-
mission and the Home Builders Association.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,
THE MEETING ADJOURNED.
W. C. Warner Edward Stang."
Secretary -Chairman
- 20 -