Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-08-07249 MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council-Chamber8-,,"City Hall Huntington Beach, -California TUESDAY, AUGUST 7th, 1962 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. MINUTES: On motion by Worthy and seconded by Letson, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of July 31, 1962, were accepted as' transcribed and mailed by the Secretary. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4707 - REVISED - Continued Number of Lots: 389 Subdivider: Macco Realty Co. Total Acreage: 116.2 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle- Nelson, Inc. Located at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue and legally described as a portion of the S-12 of Section 5-6-10— The-Secretary informed the Com- mission that the Orange County Health Department has sub- mitted a letter stating that they recommend approval of the portion of the tract described as follows: That portion of Tract 4707 lying south of Yorktown Avenue and WIly.of a line projected along the rear property line of the lots be- tween "J" Lane and 11K" Lane from Yorktown Avenue south to Lot 371, then WIly to the property line between Lot 371 and Lot,372, then south to Lot 360, then WIly to the property line between Lot 360 and Lot 359, then SIly between Lot 359 and Lot'360 and between Lot 398 and Lot 399, and between Lot 398 and Lot 400 to the north property line of the proposed commercial site, then WIly to Brookhurst Street, then NIly to Yorktown Avenue. The Subdivision Committee Report was read by the Secretary. John Parker, representing Macco Realty Co., addressed the Commission and stated that they concur with the Health Department and the Fire Department fully and agree with the Subdivision Committee Report. He further stated that the developer will take all Aecessary precautions to prevent any hazard to the proposed subdivision. Commission discussion was held at length. The Chairman called the subdivider's particular attention to the fact he may appeal any require- ment or condition made by the Planning Commission to the City 250 Page #2 Minutes - H. B. Plannin- Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 Council pursuant to Section 9771 of the Code, and also that the applicant may apply for an exception, pursuant to Section 9761, to any of the conditions required on the tract. Specifically noted was that failure to utilize these remedies shall be deemed a failure to exhaust administrative remedies by the applicant. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONbED BY MILLER TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4707 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The layout dated July 27, 1962, shall be the approved map. 2. Only that portion of the tract including and west of Lots 139� 156 to 171, 359,:372, and 398 shall be approved for recording. The remainder of the tract is approved as to design and layout but may not be recorded until further approval by the Planning Commission is secured. 3. *Lots 31 to 40-shall be included in the proposed school site. 4. A masonry wall shall be constructed at the rear and exterior sides of all reverse corner lots in accordance with City Standards. 5. All Standard Subdivision requirements shall be complied with. 6. All provisions of the park and recreation site requirements as set forth in Section 9751.21 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT,MAP NO 4708 m- Continued Number ofiLots: 320 Subdivider: Macco Realty Co. Total Acreage: 69.3 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle- Nelson, Inc. Located at the southwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Ward Street and legally described as being a portion of the Ek of the NA4 of Section 5-6-10. The Subdivision Committee Report was read by the Secretary. Sterling White, field engineer for Macco Realty Co., addressed the Commission, and opposed the requirement of improvements of Lot "An. He stated that it should be the school responsibility to improve Lot "All including masonry walls. Fire Chief Higgins stated that it was the State requirement to provide two entrances to a school site for fire apparatus. Commission discussion was held. The Chairman called the sub- dividers particular attention to the fact he may appeal any - 2 - Page #3 251 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 0 requirement or condition made by the Planning Commission to the City Council pursuant to Section 9771 of the Code, and also that the applicant may apply for an exception, pursuant to Section 9761, to any of the conditions required on the tract. Specifically noted was that failure to utilize these remedies shall be deemed a failure to exhaust administrative remedies by the applicant. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4708 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The revised layout dated August 6, 1962, shall be the approved map. 2. The walkway to the school site, designated Lot "All shall be fully improved.and shall be bounded on each side by a masonry wall. not less than 6 ft high except adjoining the front yard of abutting lots, the wall shall not exceed 4211 in height. 3. The walkways adjacent to the Edison Co. R/W shall be designated alphabetically as lots on the final map and shall be fully improved including masonry walls similar to that required on Lot "A". 4. The dedication and improvement of "Ll' Lane and Garfield Avenue shall include the parcellabled "Not a Part". 5. A masonry wall to City Standards shall be constructed along the north side of Lot 305 adjacent to the west half of the "Not a Part" parcel. 6. That port -ion of "B" Lane between Maikai Drive and Pua Drive shall be moved west approximately to Lots 295 and 300. 7. Ward Street shall be improved across the Edison Co. R/W.- S. The rear and exterior side of all reverse corner lots shall be fenced with a 6 ft masonry wall to Planning Commission standards. 9. All Standard Subdivision requirements shall be complied with. 10. All provisions of the park and recreation site require- ments as set forth in Section 9751.21 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Mifler, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT:- None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE -TRACT MAP No 4091 Number of Lots: 20 Subdivider: Chip Chasin Dev. Total AcrEnae: 5 Enaineer: McDaniel Enaineering Co. Located north of Slater Avenue and approximately 1320 ft west of Beach Blvd. and legally described as a portion of the Ell of the SV4- of the SW-14 of the NEk of Section 26-5-11. - 3 - 252 Page #4 Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 The Subdivision Committee Re- port was read by the Secretary. The Secretary informed the Commission that this was a reapproval of the same tentative map filed approximately one year ago. Mr. Jacobson, representing the developer, addressed the Commission and offered to answer any questions. The Chairman called the sub - divider's particular attention to the fact he may appeal any requirement or condition made by the Planning Commission to the City Council pursuant to Section 9771 of the Code and also that the applicant may apply for an exception, pursuant to Section 9761, to any of the conditions -required on the tract. Specifically.noted was that failure to utilize these remedies shall be deemed a failure to exhaust administrative remedies by the applicant. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4091 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Slater Avenue may be 40 feet wide from centerline. 2. All alleys shall be 20 feet wide. 3. A soil test report by an approved soils engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to recordation of any portion of the tract and all portions of the land not satisfactory for building shall be excluded. 4.. All Standard Subdivision Requirements that are applicable shaft be complied with. 5. All provisions of the park and recreation site requirements as sec forth in Section 9751.21 of� the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4153 Number -of Lots: 20 Subdivider: Chip Chasin Dev. Total Acreage: 5 Engineer: McDaniel Engineering Co. Located north of Slater Avenue approximately 660 ft west of Beach Blvd. and legally described -as a portion of the El� of the W'� of the S-12 of the SE�4- of the NE-'4 of Section 26-5-11. The Secretary informed the Com- mission that this was a reappro val of the same tract filed approximately a year ago. Page #5 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 The Subdivision Committee Report was read by the Secretary. Commission discussion was held. The Chairman called the subdivider's particular attention to the fact he may appeal any requirement or condition made by the Planning Commission to the City Council pursuant to Section 9771 of the Code and also that the applicant may apply for an exception, pursuant to Section 9761, to any of the conditions required on the tract. .Specifically noted was that failure to utilize these remedies shall be.deemed a failure to exhaust administrative remedies by the applicant. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY.KAUFMAN TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No 4153 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Slater Avenue may be 40 feet wide from centerline. 2. All alleys shall be 20 feet wide. 3. A soil test report by an approved soils engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to recordation of any portion of the tract and all porti'ons of the land not satisfactory for building shall be excluded. 4. All Standard Subdivision Requirements that are applicable shall be complied with. 5. All provisions of the parkand recreation site requirements as set -forth in Section 9751.21 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED., TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4805 Number of Lots: 402 Subdivider: Macco Realty Co. Total Acreage: 94.4 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-Nelson CD Inc. Located south of Garfield Avenue, east of Cannery Street, extending 1320 feet south of Yorktown Avenue.'and legally described as being a portion of the W11 of the NW-14 of Section 6-6-10 and a portion of the NW-4 of the SW14 of Section 6-6-10. Sterling White, Macco Realty Co., addressed the Commission and requested that action on the tentative map be continued to the next meeting. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTI'NUE THE HEARING TO AUGUST 21, 1962. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. - 5 - 254 Page #6 Minutes - H. B. Tuesday, August Planning Commission 7, 1962 NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT'MIAP NO 4806 - REVISED Number of Lots: 394 Subdivider: Anson Hamner, Jr. Total Acreage: 89 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle- Nelson, Inc. Located south of Yorktown, east of Bushard Street and legally described as being a portion of the Wk of the SEk; the W-12 of the NEk; and the SW-14 of the SE-14 of the NE-14 of Section 6-6-10. The Secretary read the Subdivision Committee Report. Kenneth Carlson, representing the subdivider, addressed the Commission and stated that there were no objections to the conditions of the Subdivision Committee Report. The Chairman called the sub - divider's particular attention to the fact he may appeal any requirement or condition made by the Planning Commission to the City Council pursuant to Section 9771 of the Code and also that the applicant may apply for an exception, pursuant to Section 9761, to any of the conditions required on the tract. - Specifically noted was that failure to utilize these remedies shall be deemed a failure to exhaust administrative remedies by the applicant. A MOTION WAS MADE BY*WORTHY AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4806 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The revised layout dated August 1, 1962, shall be the approved map. 2. A street stub to the north boundary of the tract shall be proVided a lot depth from the west boundary of the tract north of Yorktown Avenue. 3. The rear and exterior side of all reverse corner lots shall be fenced with a 6 ft masonry wall in accordance with Planning Commission Standards. 4. No portion of this tract shall be recorded until such time as further approval by the Planning Commission is secured certifying that a solution has been found to the problem of a public health hazard due to irrigation of nearby farm lands with sewer effluent. 5. All Standard Subdivision Requirements shall be complied with. 6. All provisions of the park and recreation site requirements as set forth.in Section 9751.21 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy,,Miller, Chairman Stang. 6 Page #7 Minutes H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 255 NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #438 - Continued To allow the construction Applicant - Doyle & Shields — of a low density cluster - type residential develop- ment with private park in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located approximately 200 ft north of Heil Avenue and west of Springdale Street, and legally described as Lot 85, Tract No 3647 (Huntington Village). The Secretary read a com- munication submitted by Doyle & Shields requesting that the subject variance be given consideration. - The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Charles Foisy, 5701 Venturi Lane, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and vigorously opposed the variance. Mr. Friedman, 15174 Hummingbird Lane, Bolsa Chica Homeowners Association, addressed the Commission and stated that he would like to review the sub- mitted'c-ommunication by Doyle & Shields and also review the proposed project. Enzio Scallo, adjacent property owner, stated that he was opposed to the two story buildings being built next to the single family homes. Mr. Anderson, homeowner in Huntington Village, also -opposed the granting of the sub- ject variance. -Mrs. Mosilnicar, Bolsa Chica Homeowners Association. -addressed the Commission and stated that a single family development should remain as such and she very strongly opposed the granting of the variance. Leon Ruderman, design engineer for the subdivider, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed garden type apartments. Ted Abraham, Mangrum Drive, addressed -the Commission and stated that apartment occupants do not have an interest in the'community;-,therefbre, he very strongly opposed the proposal. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. . A lengthy -discussion was held by the Commission. - 7 256 Page - #8 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 The Planning Director stated several months ago, there was a change of zone request on this property to R-4. This was denied by the Commission and the Council. He further stated that later the subject variance was filed for this specific project. It was further noted that there will soon be a,service station at the immediate corner of Heil and Springdale, which,is.zoned for business. Adjacent thereto on Heil Avenue, a variance for a medical center was approved. It was felt that the 64 units proposed is a fairly dense apartment development. It was further noted that the buildings proposed contain 4 and 6 units each which under Code definition would be multiple family dwellings. However, the number of units is midway between that which would be -permitted under R-2 and R-1. An R-2 zone would allow 102 units on the property and R-1 would allow 41 units if they were.separate detached dwellings. The request is for 64 units. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO DENY USE VARIANCE UV #438 FOR THE FOL- LOWING REASON: 1. Too many units proposed in the area for proper -planning. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb,'Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #456 To allow the existing subdivision Applicant - Luxury Home�, Inc. directional sign 12 ft x 36 ft to remain at its present loca- tion for a one year period. Located east of Beach Boulevard and north of Clay -Street and legally described as being 200 ft north of the south line of the NW-14 of the NA4 of Section 1-6-11 and 50 ft east of the west line of the NW4- of the NWk of Section 1-6-11. (Renewal of UV 288). The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director pointed out that this application is for renewal of an existing tract sign which does not comply with the proposed sign ordinance as to size and setback and perhaps.ground clearance. The Planning Director further informed the Commission that the Council has adopted Ordinance 922 concerning these tract signs and it will be effective September 5, 1962. Mw Page #9 Minutes H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 257 . A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO DENY USE VARIANCE UV #456. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. -USE VARIANCE: UV #457 To allow the construction of a ,Applicant Signal Oil and heliport -and buildings to be used Gas Co. as an office and/or other uses incidental to the operation of a heliport in the M-2-0 Industrial District combined with oil. Located on the Standard Oil Company lease and legally described as follows: From a line through the center of Standard Oil Company Wells No. B-130 and No. B-133, an area starting at a point 100 feet along said line from Well B-130 and 40 feet .SE'ly and perpendicular to said line, thence 250 ft SE'ly to 38th Street, thence 200 feet NE'ly along 38th Street, thence 250 feet NW1ly, thence 200 feet SWIly back to the point of beginning. The Staff report was read by the Secretary., The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Planning Director pointed out that this application is the first request to establish a heliport in the City and in this case it is to be used ex- clusi vely by the Signal Oil and -Gas Company for their operations connected with the proposed off -shore drilling platform'. He further informed the Commission that the applicant has stated that they have approval from both State and Federal agencies. The Commission felt that it would appear that, because of the restricted nature of�the operation and the present surroun�ing conditions, the request is reasonable. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY C'RABB_T0 APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #457 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The application shall expire 5 years from the date of approval and may be brought up for review by the Planning Commission at any time upon 10 days notice to the ' applicant. 2. A glide slope of 8:1 shall be maintained within the approach and take -off zones. 3. A telephone for emergency use shall be available on the site at all times. 258 Page #10 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7,,1962 4. Emergency fire fighting equipment -suitable to the Fire Chief shall be installed and maintained. 5. All operations shall be in accordance with the City Fire Prevention Code. 6. Any lights for night operations'shall be shielded so as not to shine in the pilot's eyes. 7. Adequate and effective noise suppressors shall be used at all times on all helicopters using the facility. . � 8. Approval of the heliport shall be secured from the Federal Aviation Agency and California Aeronautics Commission and all operations shall conform to all applicable safety rules, regulations, manuals and directives of the F.A.A. and C.A.C. 9. The permittee shall hold the ' Ci ' ty harmless -from -any and all liabilities that might be incurred and shall file with the City Clerk certificates of liability insurance in the amounts .of $500,000-per person,_$1,000,000 per accident and $100,000 property damage and naming the City as an additional insured. ROLL CALL VOTE:' AYES: Crabb, Le*tson, Bazil, Kaufm-an,-Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #459 To allow the erection of a sign Applicant - W. S. Thompson 519'111 x 911111 in the'R-4-Y Suburban Residential District. Located at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue, and legally described as being 115 ft east of the west line ok the NWk of the NA4 of Section 12-6-11 and 77 ft south of the north line of the NWk'of the NWk of Section 12-6-11. The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Jim Rogers, representing'the Mainland Nursery, addressed the Commission and asked -that consideration be given to the subject variance. Mr. Henry Dabney, nearby. property owner, stated that setbacks should apply to signs as well as buildings along Beach Boulevard. R. C. Mize, Attorney for the applicant, spoke in favor of the subject variance. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held .at length. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER. AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE UV #459 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: - 10 - 259 Page #11 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 1. Approval of this application shall be for one year from the date of approval. 2. The sign shall be erected 165 ft south of Adams Avenue, 50 ft setback from Beach Boulevard and a 10 ft clearance shall be maintained above Beach Boulevard. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb,-Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 262 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to proposed Applicant -Steverson change of district boundary and use ,Bros. Co. classification from R-4-X Suburban Residential District, as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668, to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions. The following parcel -of real- property as submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith: Located at the SE corner of Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue, and legally described as a portion of the NW-14 of Section 1-6-11. (Further legal description on file in the Planning Department Office). The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Carl Steverson, applicant, spoke in favor of the proposed zone change. 1Mr. Dabney, adjacent property owner, addressed the Commission and requested that his property be in- cluded in the proposed zone change. The Secretary informed Mr. Dabney that in order to include his parcel in the subject zone change, a new legal notice will have to be published and a new hearing held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO READVERTISE ZONE CASE NO 262 FOR HEARING -ON SEPTEMBER 5, 1962. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. '260 Page #12 Minutes'- H. B. Tuesday, August C) Planning Commission 7� 1962 ZONE CASE NO 263 CHANGE OF ZONE relative to Applicant - Hunsaker proposed change of district and Sons boundary And use classification from R-1 Single Family Residence district to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback pro- visions. The following parcel of real property as submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith: Located at the SE corner of Edinger Avenue and Edwards Street, and -legally described as being a portion of the W-12 of the NW-14-6f the NEk of Section 22-5-11, described as follows: Beginning at the N-14 corner of said section, said corner being the true point -of beginning; thence N 8903413811 E along the N line of 'said NE-14 and centerline of Edinger Avenue, a distance of 200 ft-- thence S 003912011 E parallel with the-W line of.said quarter, a distance of 2lO ft; thence'S 8903413811 W parallel -with the N line of said quarter, a distance of 200 ft to a point on the W line of said NEk; thence N 003912011 along the W line of said quarter, a distance of 210 ft to the true point of beginning. The Staff report was,read by the Secretary. audience; there -being no comment, RESOLUTION NO 263 The hearing was opened to the the hearing was closed. -- Commission discussion was held. A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case'No'-263 to the City .Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 263 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 263 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOL- LOWING REASONS: 1. Property at the northeast and northwest corners of this intersection are zoned C-4 for small neighborhood businesses. 2. The subject --property was designed into and approved as part of an adjoining tract for a non-residential use. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None, ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 264 CHANGE OF ZONE from A-1-X Applicant - Hunsaker General Agricultural District, and Sons as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 to R-1 Single Family Residence District on the following described property: - 12 - Pa-,e #13 0 Minutes - H. B. Tuesday, August 261 Planning Commission 7, 1962 1. Located approximately 660 ft west of Goldenwest Street and south of Heil Avenue and legally described as all of Tract No 4037. 2. Located west of Goldenwest Street and approximately 1320 ft south of Heil Avenue and legally described as all of Tract No 4051. The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO 264 A Resolution of the City Planning C� Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No 264 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 264 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. OF ZONE CASE NO 264 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There are recorded final subdivision maps, Tract 4037 and Tract 4051, on the subject property that has been designed to meet the requirements of the R-1 zone. 2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that are not compatible with single family residential development. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 265 CHANGE OF ZONE from A-I-X General Applicant - Huntington Agricultural District, as adopted Development Co. by Interim Ordinance No 668 to R-1 Single Family Residence District. The following parcel of real property as submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith: Located at the SW corner of Heil Avenue and Goldenwest Street and legally described as Lots I thru 84, Tract No 4381 (Huntington Development Co.). The Staff report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Secretary stated that this is merely a routine rezoning of a new tract to the R-1 zone which conforms to the use for which the tract is being built. RESOLUTION NO 265 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No 265 to the City Council. - 13 - -262 Page #14 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, August 7, 1962 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN. AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 265'RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 265 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:- 1. There is a recorded final subdivision m�Lp, Tract 4381, on the subject property that has been designed to meet the requirements of the R-1 zone. 2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that are not compatible with single family residential development. ROLL'CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy.- Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED. ATTEST: W. C. Warner Edward Stang' 6�7 Secretary Chairman - 14 -