The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1962-09-05S7 7 Page #5 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission C) Wednesday, September 5, 1962 AREA VARIANCE: AV #465 To allow a 17 ft front yard Applicant - Port Chester setback in deviation to the re - Land Corporation quired 20 ft front yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located east of Springdale Street and approximately 1001 ft north of Sugar (McFadden) Avenue and legally described as Lots 1, 38, and 39, Tract 4771. The bearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #465. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazilj Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES:- None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV #466 To allow a 4 ft front yard Applic . ant - Michael S. Coronel setback in deviation to the required 10 ft front yard setback in the R-3-0 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. Located at the'northeast corner of 15th Street and Orange Avenue and legally described as Block 414, Lots 2 and 4, Huntington Beach Tract. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience. Leroy L. Herman, 320 12tb Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor on behalf of the applicant. - There being no further comment, the bearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Planning Director informed the Commission that the applicant wishes to locate- the building as far forward on the lot as possible to get more area for turning into the garages from the alley as well as matching existing and allowed setbacks in the area. - A MOTION WAS MAhE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #466 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION'-R: 1. There shall be a 7 ft front yard setback. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, �Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 5 - 278 Page #6 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 -USE VARIANCE: UV #467 To allow the erection of an 8 ft Applicant - Mark Downing Ford, Inc. x 18 ft neon -sign in the C-2 Community Business District. Located at the southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Main Street and legally described as Lot 3, Block H,-Tract No 7. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held at length. It was pointed out by the Secretary that this application is necessary because the proposed sign is not located on the premises of the business which it is to adVertise. The Commission further noted that the applicant contends the property adjoining his business address is merely a "storage lot" and not part -of the business. It was the applicant's request to so classify the property so that it would not be necessary to install the street improve- ments on Beach Boulevard and Main Street which would be required if it were part of the business. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO DENY USE VARIANCE UV #467 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The proposed sign does not comply with the required setback. 2. The sign exceeds allowable area. 3. The proposed sign is not located on the premises of the business. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chair man Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIA NCE: UV #468 To allow the construction of six Applicant., Robert.L,_._ detached dwelling units in the Stellre'cbt A-I-X General.Agricultural District4 Located west of Elm.Street,and approximately 96,ft north of Cypress Street and legally described as Lot 3. Block B9 Tract No 4369-,exc.ept the west.198 ft thereof,. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience. Ray Walker, 17122-Elm Streetg,Huntington'Beach, addressed the Commission and questioned the proposal of six units on a parcel 98 ft x 198 ft. 279 Page #7 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 Amy Kellogg, adjoining property owner, addressed the Commission and protested to the subject variance* Ray Murrey, 17441 Beach Boulevard addressed the Commission and requested that the'Staff give more study to the area before granting the subject variance. There being no further commentg the hearing was closed. The Planning Director informed the Commission that the Staff has taken a very preliminary look at this area and it is obvious that the agricultural zone Is no longer proper zoning, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO SEPTEMBER 18, 1962. ROLL CALL VOTEt AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman ,Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE: UV #469 -To allow the construction of an Applicant - R. J. Zinngrabe addition to the existing hospital providing for twelve new beds in the R-2 Two Family Residence District. Located approximately 125 ft south of Main Street and east of Delaware Avenue and legally described as the south one half of Lot 6, Block G, Tract No 7. - The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Robert Zinngrabe, applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that he will comply with all the requirements required by the Commission. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Planning Director stated that some few months ago repre- sentatives of the Convalescent Hospital Informally discussed expansion with the Commission and the problems of off-street parking. It was the feeling of the Commission at that time that a reasonable proposal for expansion and some reduction in parking would be considered. It was noted that the 11 beds 2 per parking.space-is a realistic ratio for this type of use. - 7 - 280 Page #8 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday$ September 5, 1962 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE uv #469 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: I 1. All parking spaces shall be marked off to Planning Commission Standards. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. KOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV $470 To allow the erection of a Sydney and Saul Sher structure 52 ft from centerline of Ellis Avenue and to allow the erection of gas station canopies to encroach to within 4 ft from property line on Ellis Avenue in deviation to the required 100 ft from centerline setback and 7 ft from property line on Main Street In deviation to the required 25 ft setback In the C-2 Neighborhood Commercial District. Located at the southwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Main Street and legally -described as Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4,-Block D. Tract No 7. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Saul Sher, applicant, addressed the Commission and offered to answer any questions. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Secretary informed the Commission that there are two parts to this application, the first being a setback variance from 100 ft to 52 ft from centerline of Ellis Avenue; the second is for service station canopies to project into the setbacks on both Ellis and Main Streets. The S * ecretary further Informed the Commission that later on the agenda is a Code Amendment, initiated by the Comm ' Ission, to allow canopies to project Into the required setback; however, the Code Amendment applies to attached canopies, not detached. A MOTION WAS MADE BY.BAZIL AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #470. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Cra�b, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Page #9 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 281 USE VARIANCE: uv #471 To allow the construction of a Applicant - Signal Oil & heliport and buildings to be used Gas Co. as an office and/or other uses incidental to the operation of heliport In the M-2-0 Industrial District combined with oil. Located on the Standard Oil Co. Huntington "B" Lease, Tract No 2 and legally described as follows: Beginning at a point located on a line through the centers of Standard Oil Company Wells No 4o, 34 and 39, 50 ft SE'ly from Well No 34 on said line to Well No 39, and 70 ft SWIly at right angles thereto, said point being the true point of beginning. Thence, 200 ft SWIly along lease road, thence at right angles thereto 250 ft NW1ly, thence at right angles thereto 200 ft NE'ly, thence at right angles thereto 250 ft SE'ly to -the true point of beginning. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; -there being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Secretary stated that this application was filed only because shortly'after approval of the previous case, the applicant discovered It would be necessary to relocate the heliport. The new location is about 1000 ft SE'ly of the previous location and it appears that all safety provisions for clearance, glide angle, etc, can be met. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE uv #4?1 UPON THE SAME CONDITIONS AS UV 457. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthyl Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT; None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT: UP #2o4 To allow the construction of a Applicant - Richfield Oil service station, with pump Is - Corporation lands and electrollers constructed within the 50 ft setback areas of each street, a plastic illumi- nated sign less than 100 sq ft in area, single pole mount 20 ft In height, with part of the sign encroaching into the corner parkway area, and the construction of'30 ft x 36 ft 9 In attached canopies with cornice not exceeding 18 inches thickness and with ground clearance not less than 11 ft 6 in within the 50 ft setback areas on each street. Located at the NE corner of Beach Blvd. and Garfield Avenue and legally described as 282 Page #10 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 the S 200.00 ft of the W 238.00 ft of the SW' of the'SWI.of Section 36-5-11. Further legal description on file In the Plan- ning Department Office. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. Commission discussion.was held. The Secretary pointed out that in this case, there Is a 50 ft setback on both Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue and both setbacks- have attached canopies projecting to within 10 - 15 ft of the property line. He further informed the Commission that later on the agenda Is a Code Amendment which would allow service station car6ples to project into -the setbacks. The Commission defered a decision on this application until the hearing on the Code Amendment later in the meeting. After hearing ZC 2?0 to allow canopies to project into the required setbacks and adopting Resolution 2?0 recommending adoption of the amendment, the Com- mission reconsidered UP #204. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE USE PERMIT UP #2o4 UPON THE.FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. All provisions of the recommended Code amendment, ZC 270, shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PER14IT: UP #205 To allow the construction of a APDlicant - Wm. H. Farnsworth masonry block.or frame and stucco building to be used for the operati on of a food and beer tavern in the C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions. Located at the southwest corner of Aldrich Street and Beach Boulevard and legally described as the Elly 100 ft of Lots 34 and 35, Tract No 41?, also known as 16091 Beach Boulevardq Huntington Beach. The Secretary read a letter of protest submitted by Mrs. Effie May Neiderhiser. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mr. Ray Murray, 17441 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, protested the subject use permit on grounds of not enough parking - 10 - 283 PAGE #11 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 is provided for the proposed use. Bill Potts, 7932 Aldrich Street, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated that the proposed use is not in the right location since there is a school bus stop at the corner. Mrs. Effie May Neiderhiser, 17211 Nichols Streetq Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and vigorously protested because the proposed beer tavern does not provide sufficient off-street parking. Mr. Morgan Bissey, owner of the proposed establishment, addressed the Commission and spoke In f avor. Rudy Alvarez, 7911 Aldrich, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated his opposition because there is a school bus stop at the corner. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held at length. The Planning Director pointed out that the property involved Is rather small for comercial use; however, the plan indicates about the best way that the lot can be used. He further stated that the building occupies the rear portion of the lot with all parking in front; however, the parking spaces shown are not up to standard as they are only 9 ft x 18 ft in- stead of 10 ft x 20 ft. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO DENY USE PERMIT UP #205 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The property is too small for the proposed use. 2. Inadequate parking is provided. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Bazil, Miller, Worthy, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. DISCUSSION: A lengthy discussion was held by the Commission regarding the in- crease of parking spaces in C-zones pertaining to beer taverns and restaurants. It was the concensus that a study be made by the Staff and presented to the Commission at the next study session. ZONE CASE NO 269 A Resolution of Intent of the Initiated by Resolution City Planning Commission of the of Intent City of Huntington Beach, Calif. initiating a change of zone from R_4_X Suburban Residential District, as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668, to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback provisions on property situated generally between Garfield Avenue and Yorktown Avenue on both sides of Beach Boulevard. 284 Page # 12 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing,was closed. RESOLUTION NO 269. A Resolution of the City Plan- ning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No,269 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 269 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 269 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The present,zoning on the subject parcelslof land is not compatible with inter -city travel. 2. The property fronting on Beach Boulevard could better be utilized for highway related uses. 3. Most other property fronting on Beach Boulevard In the area Is zoned for commercial use. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Millerg Chairman I Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: *None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 270 A Resolution of Intent of the INITIATED BY RESOLUTION OF City Planning Commission of INTENT the City of Huntington Beach initiating an amendment to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to not prohibit certain striictures in the setback area of Com- mercial or Industrial developments. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO 270 A Resolution of the City -Plan- ning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No 270 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 270 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 270 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.' ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, -Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 271 Change of Zone from R-1 Single ApDlicant - J. P. Terry, Et Al Family Residence District to C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions. The following parcel of real property as submitted on the applicant's petition is described herewith: - 12 - 285 Page #13 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 Located at the northwest corner of Yorktown Avenue and Newland Street, and legally described as a portion of the SE! of the SE! of the NWI of Section 1-6-11. Further legal description 4 4 on file In the Planning Department Office. Commissioner Miller stated he would withdraw from the hearing since he has a small Interest in the property involved. The Staff R eport was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Nick Hanson, adjacent property owner, addressed the Commission and protested the proposed C-Zone. He further stated that there was adequate commercial zoning on Beach Boule- vard. Another property ownerg living at the end of a cul-de- sac abutting t he proposed commercial use, protested. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Ray Miller, speaking on behalf of the applicant, stated he has a small interest In the property and that he will withdraw the proposed zone change on behalf of Mr. Terry. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT TO WITHDRAW THE PETITION. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINED: Miller. THE MOTION CARRIED. DIVISION OF LAND: DV #1?1 To allow the division of land into Applicant - Walter Dabney two separate parcels. PARCEL I: The N 363 ft (more or less) of the W 5 acres of the SE-41 of the SW-1 of the SWI of S ection 36-5-11. 4 4 PARCEL II: The E 86 ft of the W 156 ft of the S 29? ft of the W 5 acres of the SE-1 of the SWI of the SWI of Section 36-5-11. 4 4 4 The Planning Director explained that the subject parc�ls are well over the minimum requirements. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION OF LAND DV #171 TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. Garfield Avenue shall be widened to 50 ft from centerline and curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving shall be installed on Garfield Avenue across Parcel II or a bond guaranteeing the improvements may be posted if street grades are not available. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 13 - 286 Page #14 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 STUDY SESSION: Commissioner Crabb suggested that a study session of the Commission would be In order to consider the general planning in the vicinity of the southeast industrial area. He suggested Tuesday, September 25. This suggestion was agreeable with the Commission. The Planning Di rector suggested that a study session be considered for October 30 as this will*be the 5th Tuesday of the month. The Commission agreed with the sug- gestion. LEAGUE OF CITIES: The Planning Director advised the Commission that the City Council had, by resolution, approved attendance at the League of Cities meeting in October by two members of the Commission. After discussion, It was,agreed that reser- vations be made for Commissioners Stang and Bazil and that Commissioner Kaufman would be an alternate. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS THE MEETING ADJOURNED. W. C. Warner Edward Stang Secretary Chairman - 14 - -273 MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING'COMMISSION Council Chambers, City Hall Huntington Beach, California WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1962 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:, Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Milier, Chairman Stang. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. MINUTES: On motion by Letson and seconded by Crabb, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Commission of August 21, 1962, were accepted as transcribed and mailed by the -Secretary. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4761 - Continued Number of Lots: 236 Subdivider: Huntington Harbour Total Acreace: 77.91 Corporation Engineer: Moffatt & Nichol Located north of Warner Avenue (Los Patos),'west of Algonquin Avenue, and legally described'as being a subdivision of portions of Section 20-5-11 and fractional Section 29-5-11. The Secretary informed the Commission that the subject tract was continued from previous meeting of August 21, 1962, and the Subdivision Committee Report of August 21, 1962, will apply if the Tentative Tract No 4761 is approved. There being no comment, Commission dis- cussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No 476l'UPON'THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I.- Approval of this tract shall be -subject to approval of Conditional Exception No UV #462 by the City Council. If said Exception is not so approved, all lot sizes and widths and all street widths shall comply with City Standards. 2. All waterways shall be deeded in fee to the City. 3. The tract shall be annexed to the Harbor Maintenance District now being formed. 4. Warner Avenue, formerly Los Patos Avenue, shall -be dedicated and improved 60 feet from centerline. 5. The road easement for that portion of "All Street between IIHII Street and Warner Avenue shall be conveyed to the City by separate instrument. 6. All street intersections shall be approximately at right angles. 7. That portion of I'D" Street between "All and IICII Streets shall be revised to eliminate the 4-way intersections. 274Page #2 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 i 8. Vehicular access rights from Lots 86 to 120 to "B" Street and 75 to 85 to "C"'Street shall be dedicated'to the,City. 9. All applicable,standard subdivision requirements shall be com- plied with. - ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller,.:Chairman-,Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: Note. THE MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION To allow the development of USE VARIANCE: UV #462 property for use for single Applicant: Huntington Harbour family dwelling and.appur- Corporation. tenant structures on lots when located'on waterfront with minimum area -of 5000 sq ft and with reduction of lot frontages and street,widtbs, as indicated on map of Tentative Tract No 4761 being,on file in the Planning Department Office. To allow front.y4rds on waterfront lots (Lots 194 thru 236, both inclusive) of 10 ft or more except the front ' yard,may be reduced to not less.than 5 ft in -cases where any reduction below 10 ft is added to the rear yard. To allow front yards on non -waterfront lots of 15 ft except that a garage which does not face the front lot.line may occupy not over 10 ft of the front yard. To allow rear yards of 10 ft or more. To allow side yards of 4 ft or more for the first story and,5 ft or more for the second story with ' fireplaces pro- jecting to within 2 ft of the property line. Located in the R-1 Single Family Residence District on the north side of Warner Avenue and approximately 300 ft west of Algonquin Street, and legally described as being a -portion of Section 20 and 29 T.5.S., R.11.W. Further legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Lewis Douglas, Jr., president of Huntington Harbour Corporation, addressed the Commission and questioned various con- ditions outlined in the staff report. I I There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held at length. It was noted that there are quite a variety of variances requested in this application, therefore, individual explanations and recommendations were given. - 2 - 275 Page #3 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF -CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION UV #462 TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: 1. Waterfront lots of 5000 sq ft minimum. 2. Waterfront lot widths of 46 ft minimum at the front property line. 3. Street widths of 50 ft as shown on the Tentative Map of Tract 4761.*" 4. Front yard setbacks of 10 ft on waterfront lots except 20 ft for a garage which is entered directly from the street. 5. Front yard setbacks of 15 ft for non -waterfront lots ex- cept 20 ft for a garage which is entered directly from the street. 6. Rear yards of 10 ft minimum for waterfront lots. 7. Re�ar yards of 20 ft for non -waterfront lots except that one wing of the main building, not wider than 25% of the narrowest width of the lot, may project to not less than 10 ft from the rear property line. 8. Side yards of 5 ft minimum. 9. Fireplaces may project 3 ft into the required side yard for a maximum lineal distance of 10 ft. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No 4805 - REVISED - Continued Number of Lots: 392 Subdivider: Macco R�alty Co. Total Acreage: 87.2 Engineer: Voorbeis*-Trindle- Nelson., Inc. Located south of Garfield Avenue, east of Cannery Street, extending 1320 ft south of Yorktown Avenue, and legally described as.being a portion of the W-1� of the NWk, Section 6-6-10; and a portion of the NWk of the SWk of Section 6-6-10. The Secretary read a letter submitted by Macco Realty Company requesting that Tentative Tract Map No 4805 be withdrawn from future consideration by the Planning Commission for an indefinite period. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF THE SUBDIVIDER. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 3 - 276 Page #4 C:, Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Wednesday, September 5, 1962 AREA VARIANCE: AV #463 To allow a 17 ft front yard Applicant - South Hampton Corp. setback in deviation to the, required 20 ft front yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located. east of Springdale Street, approximately 590 ft north of Sugar (McFadden) Avenue and legally described as Lot 1, Tract No�4769. - The Staff Report was read by, the Secretary who pointed out to the Commission that this report covers the subject variance -and the next two items on the agenda because the variances requested are all within the. same development. The hearing was opened to the audience; -there being no comment, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director noted that in each case the lots involved are located on a cul-de- sac and the variance requested is for a 17 ft front yard rather than 20-ft. It was further noted that in each case, it is a corner of the garage which -projects into the required front yard and further, in each case, the rear yard is held to the minimum of 20 ft. Commission discussion was held. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #463. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson,'Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE: AV #464 To allow a 17 ft front yard Applicant - Rockport Land Corp. setback in deviation to the required 20 ft front yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located east of Springdale Street and approximately 727 f t north of (McFadden) Sugar Avenue and legally described as Lots I and 36, Tract No 4770. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE AV #464. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang.' NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 4 -