Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-02-05423 Page #22 Minutes H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 the west 195'.50 ft of the south. 75 ft. of Block 2503, East Side Villa Tract. PARCEL II: East 73.50 ft of.the west 147.50 ft of .the south., 75 ft of Block. 2503, East Side Villa Tract. PARCEL III: • West ;74 ft of the south. 75 ft of Block 2503 East Side Villa Tract. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience..:-Wa1ter G.-Basham, addressed the.Commission and opposed the division of land. Mr; Rodney B.. Lauter, 2525 York- town Avenue, addressed the Commission and opposed such small parcels.. Mr. John Welsh, applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of granting the subject division •of -land. There being. -no other comment, the hearing was closed. . The Secretary informed the Commission that the original size of the property in this case was 75 ft x 195.5 ft and a small house was built at the east end. He further stated that about a year ago a 48 ft x 75 ft lot.containing the house was sold -leaving a parcel 75 ft x 147.5 ft.._. It -was noted that the 48 ft x 75 ft lot is not a legal building site since no division of land -was filed and the parcel contains only 3600 square feet. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF DIVISION OF LAND NO 180 TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. DIVISION 6F LAND NO 181 To allow a division of land of 6nplicant: Wayne Homes Lot 59, Tract 4277, excepting the S 150 ft of the W 150 ft of said lot into three separate parcels on the C-4 Highway Com- mercial District.' Located at the northeast corner of Edinger Avenue and Edwards Street and legally described as follows: - 22 - 424. Page #23 Minutes'- H. B. PlanninCommission Tuesday, February 5, 1993 DIVISION I: Providing 90.81 ft of.frontage in deviation to the required 100 ft. DIVISION II: Providing-55 ft:of.frontage in deviation to -the required 100-ft. DIVISION:III:- Being -the remainder of said property and complying with, the provisions of the C-4 zone. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience. --John Prins,'repre'senting-,the.applicant,. addressed the Commission and explained why the property was., divided as such.. He -stated that it was originally the appli- cant's intention to,lease property to various -tenants but two of their prospects wanted to purchase sites rather than -lease. - There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Commission:discussion was • held. The Secretary informed the Commission that this is the property upon which Use Permit fora restaurant and Dairy Store were considered previously. He further pointed out that two of -the -three parcels involved contain less than. the 100 ft width required in the C-4 .zone. A MOTION WAS:MADE BY-BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO RECOMMEND -APPROVAL -.OF DIVISION OF LAND NO 181-TO THE CITY COUNCIL UPON.THE-FOLLOWING • CONDITION. • . : f 7 . ­ - 1. Parcel II shall contain a minimum of•100•-ft.width along: Edinger Avenue. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. COMMUNICATION: The Secretary read a letter submitted by the Lifeguard. Chief Moorh.ouse, regarding the location of public beaches within the Huntington Harbour development.- It was further noted that the Huntington Beach. Lifeguard and the Commission should analyze the location of these beaches very carefully.. There was no action.taken, therefore, the communication was ordered received and filed. - 23 - 425 Page #24 Yinutes - H B. P1 nnCommission Tuesday, Fef)ruary , igh COMMUNICATION: The Secretary read a communi- cation submitted by the Huntington Beach Elementary School District requesting an approval on School Site #3, location being approximately 330 feet north. of Banning Avenue and east of the Orange County Flood Control District Channel. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE SCHOOL SITE NO 3, HUNTINGTON BEACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MEETING ADJOURNED. W. C. Warner Edward Stang Secretary Chairman - 24 - 40B MINUTES OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers, City Hall Huntington Beach., California TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1963 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. MINUTES: On motion by Letson and seconded by Miller, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach. Planning Commission of January 15, 1963, and January 29, 1963, as corrected, were accepted as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3898 - REVISED Number of Lots: 175 Subdivider: Holland Homes, Inc. Total Acreage: 37.6 Engineer: Millet, King & Assoc. Located at the northeast corner of Banning Avenue and Cannery Street and legally described as being a subdivision of a portion of the SWk of Section 18-6-10. The Subdivision Committee Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Jack King, representing the subdivider, addressed the Commission and stated that there were no objections to the conditions contained in the Subdivision Committee report. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 3898 - REVISED, UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Th.e revised layout dated February 1, 1963, shall be the approved map. 2. A 6 ft chain link type fence shall be constructed along the Flood Control Channel R/W. 3. A walkway and pedestrian bridge across the Flood Control Channel shall be provided near the northeast corner of the tract and a masonry wall 6 ft high. shall be constructed along each. side of the walk except where abutting the front yards of adjoining lots where such. wall shall not exceed 42 inches. 4. The rear and exterior side of all reverse corner lots shall be fenced with. a 6 ft masonry wall in accordance -with Planning Commission standards. 5. No portion of this tract shall be recorded until such. time as further approval by the Planning Commission is secured certi- fying that a solution has been found to the problem of a - public health. hazard due to irrigation of nearby farm lands with. sewer effluent. 403 Page #2 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 6. All standard subdivision requirements shall be complied with.. ROLL CALL- VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4039 - REVISED Number of Lots: 804 Subdivider: G. D. Buccola Invest - Total Acreage: 170.4 ment Co. Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle- Nelson, Inc. Located west of Edwards Street and south of Slater Avenue, and legally described as a portion of the El of the E2 of Section 28, also a portion of the SW4 of Section 27-5-11. The Secretary read a letter sub- mitted by the Ocean View School District stating that the School District has filed eminent domain on a 15 acre parcel approximately 990 ft south. of Slater Avenue and 1320 ft west of Edwards Street. The Subdivision Committee Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Kenneth Carlson, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that all conditions meet with. approval of the developer. Harold Pedersen, Superintendent of the Ocean View Elementary School District, addressed the Commission and.requested that a reasonable access to the school site be provided. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 4039, 6TH REVISED, UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The tentative map shall be revised to provide a suitable school site unless the proposed site adjacent to the tract .is suitable to the School District and the County Counsel as to-.locat-ion and feasibility -of clearing_,title. 2. Disposal of runoff water to be by pump -station, drainage channel and other necessary facilities suitable to the City Engineer. 3. The proposed drainage channel shall be fenced with. a 6 ft masonry wall adjacent to lots within the tract. - 2 - Page ;#3 Minutes- H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 4. All cul-de-sacs shall have a 50 ft property line radius. 5. That portion of the tract south of Slater Avenue and west of Springdale shall be annexed to Sanitation District 11 prior to recordation of this portion of the tract. 6. An adequate soil-test.report by an approved Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to recordation of any part of the tract. 7. All provisions of the park and recreation site requirements as set forth. in Section 9751.21 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall be complied with. 8. A petition for rezoning for the intended use of the tract shall be filed approximately at the time or recording a final map. 9. All Standard Subdivision Requirements shall be complied with. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4339 Number of Lots: 294 Subdivider: B. C. Deane Co. Total Acreage: 80 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle- Nelson, Inc. Located at the northwest corner of Adams Avenue and Cannery Street and legally described as being portions of the SE4 of Section 1-5-11. The Secretary read a letter sub- mitted by the Orange County Health Department stating that the County Health. Department has. received a statement from the developer and the Talbert Water District to the effect that the operating standards have been discussed and under- stood by both. parties and will be complied with. A MOTION MAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4339 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The revised layout dated September 1, 1961, shall be the approved map. 2. Condition No 4 of the Subdivision Committee Report dated September 19, 1961, is hereby deleted. 3. All other conditions of the Subdivision Committee Report' dated September 19, 1961, shall be complied with.. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. Noes: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. - 3 - 405 Page #4 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 ZONE CASE NO 290 - Continued Applicant: Huntington Beach Estates Change of Zone from C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District and-R-4-X Suburban Residential District to R-1 Single Family Residence District and C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions. Located on the north side of Slater Avenue and extending from Beach Boulevard to Newland Street and legally described as being a portion of the northwest quarter of Section 25-5-11 and all of Tract No 4009 in the City of Huntington Beach. Further legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was reopened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. A lengthy discussion was held by the Commission. It was noted that a strip about 200 feet deep along Beach Boulevard is presently zoned C-1. The request is to change this to C-2 and to extend the zoning to a depth. of about 560 feet. The Secretary pointed out that the acreage is split about in half by an existing.public street which creates two 5 acre parcels with most of their frontage on the local street. It was noted .that this could create a rather detrimental problem for the future residents of the adjoining tract. RESOLUTION NO 290 A Resdlution of 'the City -Planning Commission Recommending Approval of that portion of Zone Case No 290 requesting an R-1 and further Recommending Denial of that portion of Zone C ase No _290 requesting a•C-2 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 290 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THAT PORTION FOR AN R-1 ZONE AND FURTHER RECOM- MENDING DENIAL OF THAT PORTION REQUESTING A C-2 ZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There is too great of depth in the parcel proposed for commercial zoning and any further commercial zoning would overload the local streets in the area. 2. There already is ample commercial zoning in the area. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. - 4 - 406 Page #5 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 ZONE CASE NO 291 - Continued Change of Zone from R-1 Single Applicant: Huntington Beach Family Residence District to Estates C-4 Highway Commercial Dis- trict with. setback provisions. Located at the southwest corner of Warner Avenue and Newland Street and legally described as being a portion of the NW4 of Section 25-5-11. Further legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was reopened to the audience, Jack King, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and requested that Zone Case No 291-be continued to the February 19, 1963, meeting. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED'BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO FEBRUARY 19, 1963. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb,'Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 292 - Continued Change of Zone from'R-1 Applicant: Pluvious, Inc. Single Family Residence District to R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. Located on both. sides of Kona Drive and west of Bolsa Ch.ica Street and legally described as Lots 146 and- 147 of Tract '3750 in the city of Huntington Beach. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. ' The hearing was reopened to the audience. Jack King, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and requested continuance of Zone Case No 292 to the February 19, 1963, meeting. There being no further comment, the hearing was 6losed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY-CRABB TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO FEBRUARY 19, 1963. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. 407 Page #6 Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman'Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 301 Change of Zone from A-1-X Applicant: Gomer J. Sims & Cecil B. Hollingsworth General Agricultural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 to R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. Located at the southeast corner of Heil Avenue and Graham Street and legally described as the N 1/3 of the WZ of the NW4 of the SE4 of Section 21-5-11 SBB & M, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the S 3 acres thereof. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Harold Madrich., owner of a home within the Huntington Village tract, addressed the Commission and vigor- ously protested to the subject zone change. He further stated that the area should be kept as an R-1 zone. Jay Lawyer, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed development. J. H. Wison, 5871 Heil Avenue, addre-ssed the Commission and stated that he would rather see that the property is developed into single family use than multiple residences. the hearing was closed. There being no other comment, Commission discussion was held. It,was noted that to the south is a 3 acre parcel zoned R-3 which is abutting the golf course and is being subdivided but upon which. no construction of buildings has started. It was also pointed out by the Secretary that in the area to the north. are new single family homes. To the west are a few scattered homes and on -the east is the golf course. The Commission felt that a limited type of multiple family use would be quite acceptable at this site. RESOLUTION NO 301 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of 'Zone Case No 301 for an R-2 Zone Rather than the -Requested R-3 Zone to the City Council. • Page ;�7 Minutes'- H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.301-RECOMMENDING AN R-2 ZONE RATHER THAN AN R-3 ZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL -FOR THE, FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. A multiple zone such as R-3 would provide_ for too great a density for the area. 2. An R-2 zoning would be more compatible with. the surrounding area. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman ,Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 306 Change of Zone from R-1 Applicant: I. Page Sowers, M.D. Single Family Residence District to R-5 Professional and Trailer Park District. -Located north of Adams Avenue and approximately 660 ft east, of Cannery Street and legally described as Lots 82, 83, and 84 of Tract No 4493. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. I. Page Sowers, applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that the requested R-5 is not intended for a trailer park but he.plans to construct a.medical building._ Cecil Johnson, representing Mrs. Ellen Williams, addressed the Commission and opposed the zone change. Mr. Bishop, resident -of -Glen Mar tract, addressed the Commission and stated that he is opposed to a trailer park but not to a professional building. Mr. Van Emerin, homeowner x&h.in th.e Glen Mar development, addressed the ,Commissi.on and spoke in favor of the medical center. Mrs. Peter Willis, also a resident within the tract,,addressed the Commission and vigorously opposed the requested medical center. There being no further comment; the hearing was closed. The Commission held a lengthy discussion. It was noted that the requested R-5 consists of three lots which.''were-originally approved as part of the single family tract but have been used as a parking lot for the adjoining model homes. - 7 - 409 Page #8 Minutes'- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 RESOLUTION NO 306 A Resolution of _the City Plan- ning Commission the Denial of Zone Case No 306 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 306 RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ZONE CASE NO 306 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There are too many uses permitted in -the R-5 district for • the particular neighborhood. 2. The establishment of an R-5 district would be considered as an extension of commercial activity too far into the single family neighborhood. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Chairman Stang. NOES: Worthy, Miller. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. A FURTHER MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY KAUFMAN TO WAIVE FEES FOR A VARIANCE ON THE SUBJECT LOTS IN THE EVENT THE APPLICANT DECIDES TO REFILE. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: Bazil. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 307 Change of Zone from A-1-X General Applicant: Mesa Associates, Agricultural District as adopted _ Incorporated by Interim Ordinance No 668 to R-S-Professional and Trailer Park District. . Located approximately 660 feet west of Golden - west Street and north of Talbert Avenue, and'legally described as the S 825. feet of the W2-of the SE4 of Section 27-5-11. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the aulience. Walter Yoder, applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed R-5 zone. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. It was felt that there is a great deal of potential development in the area in the near future, some of which the Commission questioned the compatibility of a trailer park. It was further noted that this potential plus the fact that there are no sewer or water lines within a half mile, makes the requested R-5 zone very premature. M-1m 410 Page #9 Minutes- H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 RESOLUTION NO 307 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recom- mending Denial of Zone Case No 307 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 307 RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ZONE CASE NO 307-TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There is a great deal of potential development in the area in the near future, some of which., it is felt, would be incompatible with a trailer park and other R-5 zone uses. 2. There are no sewer or water lines within a half mile which. makes the requested R-5 zone very premature. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 308 Change of Zone from A-1-X Apnlicant: Chip Chasin General Agricultural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 and M-1 Light Industrial District to R-5 Professional and Trailer Park District. Located at the northeast corner of Talbert Avenue and Goldenwest Street, and legally described as the west 30 acres of the SW4 of the SW4 of Section 26-5-11. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to'the audience. Ray Mercardo, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed R-5 zone. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. The Secretary informed the Commission that the property involved in this case is located just 660 feet east of the property which was the subject of the previous hearing. He further pointed out that in general the circumstances are the same as that case and the Staff opinion of the proposal being premature is also the same. The Secretary further in- formed the Commission that the next item on the agenda is a variance covering the subject property for a trailer park presumably in order that construction could be underway while the zone change is being completed. It was the concensus that the Staff should study the entire area and a report be made to the Commission at an early date. 411 Page #10 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO CONTINUE THE HEARING OF ZONE CASE NO 308 TO THE APRIL 2,' 1963, MEETING. ROLL CALL VOT&: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO 516 Lpplicant: Chip Chasin To allow the construction of a Mobile Home Park development in the A-1-X General Agricultural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 and in the M-1 Light Industrial District. Located at the northeast corner of Talbert Avenue and Goldenwest Street, and legally described as the West 30 acres of the 8W4 of the SW4 of Section 26-5-11. The Secretary read the Staff ­ Report. The hearing was opened to the Audience. Ray Mercado, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed -Trailer Park. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. The -Commission held a lengthy discussion. It was noted that in this particular plan all points of access'to Talbert Avenue and Goldenwest Street are potentially very hazardous due to the contour of these streets. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO DENY USE VARIANCE NO 516 AND WAIVE THE FEES FOR A VARIANCE IN THE EVENT THE APPLICANT DECIDES TO RE- APPLY-AFTER'THE ZONE CASE NO 308 IS RE -CONSIDERED ON APRIL 2, 1963. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil', Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None., ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. ZONE CASE NO 309 Change of Zone from A-1-Y Applicant: Earl A. Lamb General Agricultural -District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 672 to R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located at the northwest corner of Yorktown Avenue and Bushard Street and legally described as Tract No 4743 - South Shores Homes. - 10 - 41-2 Page #11 Minutes-- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed•. It was noted that this is a routine case requesting an R-1 zone for a new tract which is under construction. RESOLUTION NO 309 A Resolution of -the City Plan- ning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone Case No 309 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 309 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 309 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There is a recorded final subdivision map on the subject property, Tract 4743, that has been designed to meet the requirements of the R-1 zone. 2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that are not compatible to single family residential development. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Milbr, Chairman ,Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 310 Change_of Zone from A-1-Y Applicant: Ivan H. Harper General Agricultural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 672 to R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located at. the southeast corner of Garfield Avenue and Brookhurst Street and legally described as Tract No 4305 - South. -Shores Homes. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. - The Secretary informed the Commission that this was another routine zone case for a tract which.has just been completed. RESOLUTION NO 310 A Resolution of the.City Plan- ning Commission Recommending Approval of Zone -Case No 310--- to. the. -City', -Council. -_ 412 Page #12 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 310 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 310 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There is a recorded final subdivision map, Tract-4305, on the subject property that has been designed to meet the requirements of the R-1 zone. 2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that are not compatible with, single family residential development. ROLL CALL • VOTE : AYES,: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller,,Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 311 Change of Zone from A-1-Y Applicant: Ivan H. Harper General Agricultural District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 672 to R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located at the southwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street and legally described as Tract No 4304 - South. Shores Homes. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Kenneth. Lloyd, 9372 Velardo Drive, Huntington Beach, addressed the Commission and stated that he was informed that the subject property was to be developed into a park area. Commissioner Bazil pointed out to Mr. Lloyd that property which is involved in this case is not proposed for any future park site since the area has been developed and completed as an R-1 Single Residence Use. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO 311 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Recommending Approval of 'Lone Case No 311 to the City Council. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 311 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL'OF ZONE CASE -NO 311 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There is a recorded final subdivision map on the subject property, Tract 4304, that has been designed to meet the requirements of the R-1 zone. 2. The -rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that are not compatible to single family residential development. - 12 - 4.44 Page #13 Minutes-- H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazi1, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE -RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ZONE CASE NO 312 Change of Zone from R-4-X nApplicant:- Olive M. Rice Suburban Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 to R-3 Multiple Family Residence District. Located north of Slater Avenue and approximately 460 feet west of Beach. Boulevard and legally described as follows:' parcel I: The W'2 of the E z of the S 2 of the SE-4 of the NE4 of Section 26-5-11. Parcel II: An undivided'interest in the S 15 ft of the N 32.5 ft of the W 28 ft of the E 192 ft of the E2 of the W2 of the S2 of the SE4 of the NE4 of Section 26-5-11. Parcel III: A R/W'for pipe line purposes, together with the right of entry for installation, repair and maintenance, thereof along aline which begins at a paint in the Nfly extension of the E line of the land described in Parcel'Ii abovedistant 16 ft S of the N line of the E2 of the W2 of the S2 of the SE4 of the NE4 of Section 26-5-11, and running Elly parallel with saidN line to the E line of 'said E2. Parcel IV: An easement for ingress and egress over the E 10 ft and the N 17.5 ft of th.e E 102 ft of the E 2 of the W2 of the S2 of the SE4 of the NE4 of Section 26-5-11. The'Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience'; 'there being no comment, the hearing was closed. Commission discussion was held. The Secretary informed the Commission that this property is a parcel about five acres situated between an existing R-3 zone and an existing C-1 zone. He further stated that 'to 'thd' north. is the community of Ocean View which, will probably be zoned in the future for limited multiple family use. RESOLUTION NO 312 A Resolution of the City Planning Commission Re -commending Approval of Zone Case No 312 to the City Council. A'MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY - AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 312=RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 312TO THE CITY COUNCIL.FOR..THE . FOLLOWING REASON: - 13 - 415 Page #14 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 1. The property is surrounded by multiple and commercial zoning on the'east and west and the property to the north will probably be zoned for multiple family use in the future. ROLL CALL VOTE:. AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. USE VARIANCE NO 505 --Continued Applicant: Huntington Barbour Corporation To allow the construction of general uses permitted in C-2 zone plus thefollowing marina - related uses: (1) Boat sales, boat building and repair, boat launching, boat storage, boat mooring facilities of any type, including piers, docks, wharves, slips or ramps. (2) Boat fuel and service facilities. (3) Boat and marine stores, supplies, parts and accessory shops. (4) Private boat and/or beach clubs, restaurants, service stations (auto- mobile). Located north of Warner Avenue and approximately 900 feet west of Algonquin Street in the R-1'Single Family Residence District. Legally described as Lot No 174, Tract No 4880, also that portion of fractional Section'29-5-11. The Secretary read the Staff Report . - 'The hearing was opened to the audience. Everett Peddicord, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and read a lengthy report regarding the parking requirements. There being no other` comment, the hearing was closed. ' A lengthy discussion was held by the Commission. They noted that as to the details of the plan and application, there were still some problems since the application requests a multitude of uses while the plot plan shows only a few of them. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO 505 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Provide at least 0.75 parking spaces for each boat slip or mooring space,. 2. Provide parking at the ratio of one space for each. 200 square feet of gross floor area in,the--club house. 3. Provide -one parking space for each 1000 square feet in the patio,.beach., and dressing room area. - 14 - 416 Page #15 Minutes H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 4. The size of parking spaces and their arrangement to be substantially as shown on the plot plan. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Miller, Worthy, Letson, Chairman Stang. NOES: Kaufman, Crabb, Bazil. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE VARIANCE NO 512 To allow the construction of Applicant: Cas Jacinski a two story four unit apart - Trent building with. four car ports on a lot containing less than the required area in the R-2-0 Two Family Residence District combined with oil production. Located at the north- west corner of Delaware Street and Hartford Avenue, and legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 804, Vista Del Mar Tract. The Secretary read three separate communications requesting the denial of the.proposed two story,four unit apartment building. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mrs. Williams, 805 Delaware Street, addressed the Commission and opposed the subject variance. Also verbally protesting the subject variance were Mr. C. H. Holmes, 908 California Street and Mr. L. H. Benning, 708 California Street. There being no other comment, the hearing was closed. The ,Commission held a lengthy discussion. It was noted that the property consists of a lot 54 ft x 122.5 ft for a total of 6,615 square feet. The Secretary informed the Commission that a minimum of 8000 square feet is required for a four unit building which. means that the applicant is short. by 1385 square feet. The Commission ,felt, that the property should be used,in the manner in which it is zoned. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO DENY USE VARIANCE NO 512 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. There would be too many units on the lot, 2. The extra density would be contrary to the intent of the• zoning in ' th.e- area. - 15 - 417 Page #16 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson; Bazi1, Kaufman, Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. Worthy, Miller, Chairman USE VARIANCE NO 513 To allow the -construction of Applicant: Union Oil Co. a service station with detached pump island canopies within the required 50 ft setback in the C-2 Community Business District. Located at the southeast corner of Adams Avenue and Cannery Street and legally described as the NIly 150 feet of the W11y 160 feet of Lot No 82, Tract No 4284: The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO 513 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. The detached pump island canopies shall not be more than 18 inches in thickness and shall have a ground clearance of not less than 12 feet above the centerline grade of the adjacent streets. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE NO 514 To allow a,18 ft rear yard Applicant: Williamson Park Co. setback on Lots 69 and 70 and to allow a 16 ft rear yard setback on Lot 72, and to allow a 15 ft rear yard setback on Lot 42, all in deviation to the required 20 ft rear yard setback in the'R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located on Anchorage Drive and Shore Circle in Tract No 4742. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened°to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. The Secretary informed the Commission that the four variances involved in this case are minor adjustments for the corner of houses to project into the required rear yard. - 16 - 4�8 Page #17 Minutes'- H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 514. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, - Chair-', man Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE -NO 515 To allow a 18 ft front yard Applicant: Macco Realty Co. setback on Lot No 20, Tract No 4630 in deviation to the required 20 ft front yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located at the northwest corner of Ch.esapeake Lane and Groton Drive, Huntington Beach. The Staff Report was ready by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. It -,was noted- that this was another case of the standard house.: not-.f,itting _ on . an odd-. = shape lot.-_ A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE"AREA VARIANCE NO 515.' ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb,- Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE NO 517 . To allow a 15 ft front yard Applicant: Westminster Athletic Club, -Inc. setback on Lot No 20 Tract No 4882, in deviation to the required 20 ft front yard setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located south. of Shields_ Drive and approximately 120 ft east of Springdale Street. The Secretary read a letter submitted by Glenn Busby, representing the Westminster Athletic Club, Inc., requesting the withdrawal of the subject variance. .A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO GRANT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. - 17 - 419 Page #18 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None, ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE NO 518 To permit the following: Applicant: Pinker Dev. Corp. (1) 12 ft setback on proposed lots on Newland Street in deviation to the required 52 ft setback. (2) 15 ft setbacks on proposed lots on Warner Avenue in deviation to the required 50 ft setback. (3) 6 ft masonry walls on front property lines on all proposed lots. Located at the northwest corner of Newland Street and Warner Avenue and legally described as a portion of the E z of the SE4 of the SW--4 of Section 24-5-11; EXCEPTING the E 192 ft of the S 210 ft of the above described property in the C-4 Highway Commercial District. The Secretary read the Staff Report. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. A lengthy discussion was held by the Commission. The Secretary pointed out to the Commission that the subject variance is necessary because a 50 ft setback on Warner Avenue and Newland Street was imposed for commercial development. He further informed the Commission that the applicant preferred to file a yard variance rather than change the zone to R-3 in order to eliminate the 50.ft setback. He further pointed out that 6 ft masonry walls are included in the variance on the front property line of practically all lots. It was the consensus that the area would be over- crowded. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO DENY AREA VARIANCE NO 518. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb,.-Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang, NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. 4.20 Page #19 Minutes•- H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 USE PERMIT NO 212 To allow the construction of Applicant: James Praggastia a service station and washing facility in the* C-4 Highway Commercial District. Located at the northwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Beach Boulevard and legally described as a portion of Lot 18, Block H, Tract No 7. Further legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience; th.ete being no comment, it was closed._ The Secretary informed the Commission that one service station exists at the intersection of Beach and Garfield and two more will soon be under con- struction. It was further noted that most of the surrounding area is undeveloped except for a few widely scattered homes. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 212 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be one parking space for each of the average number of employees. 2. There shall be a storage or stacking line-for•cars-waiting to be washed which, is twice the length, of the car wash. building. ROLL CALL VOTE . ' • AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None.. ABSENT:., None THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO 213 To.allow the construction -of Applicant: Craig Jewett a -drive-in restaurant-in•the C-4 Highway Commercial Dis- trict with. setback provisions. Located approximately 150 ft east of Edwards Street and approximately 50-ft north of - Edinger Avenue, and legally described as the Elly 55*ft of that portion of•Lot 59, Tract No 4277. Further legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. The Staff Report was read by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. John Prins, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed crostructio n of the drive-in restaurant. - 19 - 421 Page #20 Minutes - H. B. Planningg Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 The following homeowners within the Stardust Homes tract addressed the Commission and spoke against the drive-in restaurant Stan Classic, 6531 Limerick Drive; Mr. Whitcomb, 6572 Limerick Drive; Mr. J. E. Statham 6501 Limerick Drive; and Mr. Ken Turlis, 6502 Limerick Drive; and-Mr.-J. N. Boyd, 6582 Limerick Drive. Mr. Craig Jewett,. applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the proposed project. Also a petition of protest was submitted to .the Secretary of the Planning Commission signed by 25 homeowners within the Stardust Homes Tract. the hearing was closed. There being no -further comment, Commission discussion was held at length.. It was pointed out by the Secretary that the proposed restaurant is a permitted use in the7C-4 zone. Also the -setback, parking, etc. all meet City Standards except for the size of the lot. The lot is 55 ft. wide. instead of the 100 ft minimum required in the C-4 zone and it has a 15 ft driveway easement on the west side. The Secretary informed the Commission that the next.application,on the agenda is for a site just north of the -service station and Item 26 on the agenda -is a division of land involving all of these sites. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 213 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. There shall be no outside music speakers. 2. No lights shall be directed toward the rear,of the property. 3. Use Permit No 213 shall be conditionally approved upon the City Council's approval of Division of Land No 181.' ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO 214 Applicant: Hank Hornstra To allow the construction of a drive-in dairy store in the - C-4 Highway Commercial District. Located approximately 150 ft north of Edinger Avenue and east of Edwards Street and legally described as the W'ly 135 ft of Lot 59, Tract No 4277; EXCEPTING that portion thereof lying - 20 - 422 Page #21 Minutes - H. B. Planning Commission Tuesday, February 5, 1963 SIly of a -line which.is parallel with the centerline of Edinger Avenue and 200 ft NIly measured along the center.line:.of :Edwards Street from the intersection of said centerline. -The Staff Report" was read . by the Secretary. The hearing was opened to the audience. John Prins,.representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and explained the project. He further stated that the applicant will comply with, the required 50 ft set- back and wi 11 meet all the parking requirements. _ Mr: Whitcomb, 6572.Limerick Drive, addressed the Commission and questioned the lighting and time of unloading the milk. Mr. Hornstra, applicant, addressed the Commission and stated that the dairy store will be receiving about 8:00 A.M., and will be open until 8:00 P.M. There being no further comment, the hearing, was closed. . Commission discussion was held at length. It was pointed out that this is another case of the lot not meeting the minimum requirements of 100 ft in width since the lot is=only 90.68 ft wide and it has a 20 ft alley easement along the north side. A MOTION.WAS-MADE BY CRABB- AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 214 upon THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Parking and setback shall meet the requirements of the - Zoning Ordinance. 2. Approval shall be subject to City Council approval of DV No. 181.' 3. No lighting•"shall be directed to the,north. ROLL CALL VOTE. - AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman,_ Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. DIVISION OF LAND NO 180 To allow the division of Applicant: John-M. Welsh land into three separate parcels containing less than 6,000 square feet required land area. Located at the NE corner•of Yorktown Avenue and Huntington Avenue and legally described as follows: PARCEL I: East 48 ft of - 21 -