HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-10-01189
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY,. OCTOBER 1, 1963
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman,
Miller.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
Commissioner Crabb requested that the
MINUTES: Minutes of the Planning Commission of
September 17, 1963, be corrected by
deleting his vote on the first three
items since he arrived late for that meeting.
On motion by Miller and seconded
by Letson, the Minutes of the Huntington Beach Planning Com-
mission were accepted as corrected.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5288 - Continued
Number of Lots: 11 ,Subdivider: T & T Investment Corp.
Total Acreage: 2.50 Engineer: R. H. Parlee & Assoc.
Located 660 feet north of Garfield
Avenue, 1320 feet east of Beach Boulevard and legally described
as the N2,. W2, W2, SE4, SW4, Section 36-5-11.
The Secretary informed the Com-
mission that the agent for the subdivider requested the
continuance of the hearing to October 15, 1963.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO OCTOBER 15, 1963.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller.
NOES: None,
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang,
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5322 - Revised -
Number of Lots: 11 Subdivider: Stanley Bell
Total Acreage: 3.3 Engineer: Hal Raab Surveying Co.
Located on the north, side of Talbert
Avenue, approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard, and
legally described as being a subdivision of a portion of the
S2, SE4, SE4 of Section 26-5-11.
The Subdivision Committee Report
was read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Stanley Bell, subdivider, addressed the Commission
and stated that there were no objections to the conditions
10/1/63
0
Page #2
Minutes! Huntington Beach Planning Commission
Tuesday, October 1, 1963
contained in the Subdivision Committee Report.
the hearing was closed.
There being no other comment,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB
AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5322-
Revised, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The Revised Tentative map dated September, 1963, shall be
the approved layout.
2. If multiple family dwellings are to be constructed, a
petition for re -zoning the property to R-3 shall be filed
approximately at the time of recording a final map.
3. All Standard Subdivision Requirements that are applicable
shall be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Miller, Kaufman.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP -NO 5331
Number of Lots: 252 Subdivider:
Total Acreage: 52 Engineer:
Aries Homes, Inc.
Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, Inc.
Located 660 feet south of
Warner Avenue on the west side of Springdale Street and legally
described as being a proposed subdivision of a portion of the
NE4 of Section 28=5-11.
The Secretary read a letter
submitted by Kenneth Carlson, engineer for the subdivider,
"requesting a continuance of Tract No 5331 to the October 15,
1963, meeting.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
BAZIL AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5331 TO THE OCTOBER 15, 1963, MEETING.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 641 - Continued To allow the construction
ARnlicant: Paul E. Strong of a 5 foot hi,Rh fence to
encroach to within 15
feet of the front property
line in deviation to the required 20 foot front yard setback in
the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located on the east
side of Catalina Circle and approximately 100 feet north of
Molokai Drive and legally described as Lot 15, Tract 3903.
-2- 10/1/63
19i
Page #3
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, October 1,,1963
The Secretary read a petition
signed by eleven adjacent property owners favoring the
proposed construction.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, it was closed.
The Secretary stated that this
case had been continued in order to give the applicant time to
draw detailed plot plans showing landscaping and types of
building materials to be used.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 641 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITION'::
1. The fence and landscaping shall be substantially as shown
on the plans.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 647 To allow the construction of
6RRlicant: George Sheridan a 6 foot high fence to encroach
to the property line in a
portion of the exterior side
yard and to allow said fence to encroach to within 10 ,feet
of the front property line in deviation to the required 20
foot front yard setback in the R-l'Single Family Residence
District. Located at the northeast corner of Springfield
Avenue and Park Street and legally described as the S2 of
Lot 2, Block 1802, Tract 12, 1802 Park St.
The Staff Report was read by
the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. George Renner, 807 Frankfort Street, owner of
adjacent property, addressed the Commission and vigorously
opposed the variance.
Doug Oldfield, 1816 Park Street,
addressed the Commission and objected because he felt there
would be a traffic hazard if the proposed fence were to be
constructed on the corner.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
Considerable discussion was
held by the Commission.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 647 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
-3- 10/1/63
192
Page #4
Minutes: H. B. Planningg Commission
Tuesday, October 1, 1963
1. There shall be no trees or shrubs over 3 feet high in the
corner cut-off area.
2. A masonry fence, rather than wood, shall be constructed in
all of the front yard area.
3. The fence and landscaping shall substantially comply with
plot plans as submitted.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.=
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT NO 228 To allow'the construction
Applicant: Leslie Nicholson, M.D. of two retail stores.in
the C-4 Highway Com-
mercial District.
Located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 600
feet north of Ellis Avenue and legally described as the north
66 feet of the south 264 feet of the N2 of the SE-4 of 'the SE4
of the NE4 of Section 35-5-11.
The Staff Report was
read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened
to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
It was the concensus
that the matter should be continued to allow time to work out
the problems involved.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
LETSON AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO CONTINUE THE MATTER .TO
OCTOBER 15, 1963.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazi1, Kaufman, Miller.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 329
Initiated by Resolution of Intent
territory within th.e city limits.
Proposed amendment to
the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways
which encompasses all
The hearing was opened
to the audience; there being no comment,.it was closed.
RESOLUTION NO 329 A Resolution of the City Planning Com-
mission Recommending Approval of Zone
Case 329 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
MILLER AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 329 RE-
COMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 329 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
-4- 10/1/63
193
Page #5
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, October 1, 1963
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 377 Change of Zone from A-1-X
Initiated by Resolution of Intent General Agricultural District
as adopted by Interim
Ordinance No 668 to R-1
Single Family Residence District, R-2 Two Family Residence
District and R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District
on property located south of Warner Avenue, on the east side
of "All Street, the east and west sides of "B" Street. Complete
legal description on file in the Planning Department Office..
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Mrs. H. H. Uyekawa, owner. of property at "B"
Street and Warner Avenue, addressed the Commission and asked
various questions regarding the proposed zone change.
There being no other comment,
the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was
held. It was noted that the zoning conforms to the adopted
Master Plan for this area.
RESOLUTION NO 377 A Resolution of the City Planning Com-
mission Recommending Approval of Zone
Case 377 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB
AND -SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 377 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 377 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The land use of this area is predominantly residential
and this change will eliminate any uses which are in-
compatible with the present use.
2. The adopted Master Plan for this area shows it for
residential development.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 378
Initiated by Resolution of Intent
Proposed amendment to
Article 941 of the Huntington
Beach. Ordinance Code estab-
lishing parking requirements
in the C-3 General Business
District.
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Ralph Kiser, representative of the Downtown
Merchants Association, addressed the Commission and spoke at
-5- 10/1/63
Page #6
Minutes: H. B. Planning
Tuesday, October 1, 1963
length regarding the problem of parking along Main Street.
He further stated that their group is considering several
problems in the downtown area. It was stated that the Associ-
ation endorses the proposal for parking requirements in the
C-3 Zone.
Paul Phillips, president of
the Merchants Association, addressed the Commission and stated
that the whole downtown area has to be considered and that
the proposed parking requirements would be part of the answer.
There being no further
comment, the hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 378 A Resolution of the City Planning' Com--
mission Recommending Approval of Zone
Case No 378 to the City Council:
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB
AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 378 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE 378 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Miller.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Worthy, Chairman Stang.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
COMMUNICATION: The Planning Director read
a letter submitted by a
group of residents of the northwest section of the city re-,
questing an,interpretation of allowing a recreation center in
the C-2 Community Business District.
Carl V. Volamia, representing
the homeowners, addressed the Commission and explained the
proposed project.
A lengthy discussion was held
by the Commission. It was the concensus that such use should
be considered by use variance.,
DISCUSSION: Commissioner Crabb suggested
that the Staff study, re-
quirements for landscaping of parking lots in the Commercial
zones. It was his suggestion that at least 5% of the area .of _
parking lots should be landscaped for projects of one acre or
more.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB
AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO INSTRUCT THE STAFF TO PREPARE A ROUGH
DRAFT FOR PRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSION AT A FUTURE MEETING.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,
THE MEETING ADJOURNED.
W. C. Warner Edward Starig
Secretary Chairman
-6- C/10 1/ 63