HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-02-18317
MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City*Hall
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1964
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Letson, Bazil, :Crabb, Worthy,
Miller, Larkin.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chairman Kaufman.
MINUTES: On motion by Worthy and seconded
by Miller, the Minutes of the
Huntington Beach Planning Commission of February 4, 1964,
were accepted as transcribed and mailed by the Secretary.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5331 - Continued - Revised
Number of Lots: 327 Subdivider: Aries Homes, Inc._
Total Acreage:. 70 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle*-
Nelson, Inc.
Located 660 feet south of Warner
Avenue on the west side of Springdale Street and legally
described as being a proposed subdivision of a portion of the
N2 of Section 28-5-11.
The Subdivision Committee Report
was read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment,.the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LARKIN TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5331 WITH
THE FOLLOWING CO NDI TI ON S :
1. The Revised Tentative Map dated January 24, 1964, shall
be the approved layout.
2. "H" Avenue shall be widened to a 30 foot half street.
3. A 6 foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the
northerly side of the Flood Control Channel along
Slater Avenue.
4. The East Garden Grove - Wintersburg Channel shall be
fenced to flood control District Standards.
5. A petition for rezoning for the intended use of the
southerly portion of -the tract shall be filed approximately
at the time of recording a final map.
6. All Standard Subdivision Requirements shall be complied
with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Miller, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES:- None.,
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED,
2/18/64
Page #2
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5500
Number of Lots : . 108 Subdivider:
Total Acreage: 24.1 Engineer:
S.P.I. Development
Corporation
Millet, King & Assoc.
Located on the easterly side
of Springdale Street and on the southerly side of Warner Avenue
and legally described as being a proposed subdivision of a
portion of the NW4, NW4, Section 27-5-11.
The Subdivision Committee
Report was read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to
the audience; there being no comment, it was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY
AND SECONDED BY MILIE R TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5500
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Disposal of runoff water shall be approved by .the City
Engineer.
2. Avenues B and F shall contain an additional lane of
paving along the proposed school site.
3. Standard turn-arounds shall be provided At the east ends
of the alleys.
4. The dedication and improvement of Warner Avenue and
Springdale Street shall include the parcel designated
"Not a Part".
5. Provisions shall be made for a street connection between
Avenues "A" and "B" through lots 36 and 37 meeting the
approval of the City Engineer.
6. All Standard Subdivision Requirements shall be complied
with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE,_ICASE NO 413 Continued Change of Zone from
Applicant: Coldwell, Banker & Co.. A-1-X General Agricul-
S.P.I. Development Corp, tural District as
adopted by Interim
Ordinance No 668 to C72
Community Business District with setback provisions, R-1
Single Family Residence District, and R-3 Limited Multiple
Family Residence District. Located east of Springdale Street
and south of Warner Avenue and legally described as being the
NW4, NW4, Section 27-5-11-.
The hearing was opened
to the audience. G. A. Mocilnokar, 1572,Hummingbird Lane,
addressed the Commission and suggested that the Commission
consider an R-2 Znne rather than the requested R-3. Mr. Bow$,e,
president of S.P.I. Corp.,'explained the request for an R-3 zone.
-2- 2/18/64 ,
Page #3
Minutes! H. B. Planningg Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
319
There being no other comment,
the hearing was closed.
Commission discussion was held.
It was noted that this request is in conformity to the
Revised Master. Plan of Land Use.
RESOLUTION NO 413 A Resolution of the City.Planning
Commission Recommending Approval of
Zone Case No 413 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND SECONDED
BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 413 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF ZONE CASE NO 413 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR'THE FOLLOWING
REASONS:
1, The proposal is generally within the intent of the
Master Plan for this area.
2. The portion of the property requested for R-3 zoning
is near an intersection and on a major highway which could
adequately serve traffic generated by a high density use.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: ,Kaufman., -
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5502
Number of Lots: 9 Subdivider: D': N. Schneider Co.
Total Acreage: 2.5' Engineer: McDaniel Engr. Co.
Located" at the northwest corner
of Florida Street and Utica Avenue and legally described as
being a proposed subdivision'of a portion of Block 2106, East
Side Villa Tract.
The Subdivision Committee Report
was read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to -.the
audience. Bill Hartge, Deputy Director of Public Works,
addressed the Commission and pointed out that drainage and
sewer problems would be created by development of the property
„as proposed on the tentative -map. He further stated that if
a revision were made so that the cul-de-sac street entered
from Utica Avenue rather than Florida Street, the drainage
and sewer problems would be eliminated.
Ron Kendricks, engineer for the
subdivider, addressed the Commission and explained proposal
to solve the drainage and sewer problems with easements.
D. N. Schneider, applicant,
addressed the Commission and stated he would prefer that the
tract layout stay as originally .submitted.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
-3- 2/18/64
320
Page #4
Minutes: H. B. Plannin Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1 64
A MOTION .WAS : MADE • BY BAZI L AND
SECONDED BY LARKIN TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5502 UPON
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The design of the tract shall be revised -by rotating the
plan 90 to have the cul-de-sac street intersecting Utica
Street rather than Florida 'Street and the proposed _
Alley shall be located along the west side of the tract
and shall be terminated with a standard turn -around.
2. Disposal of runoff water shall meet the -approval of the
City Engineer.
3. All Standard Subdivision requirements that are applicable
shall ,be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Letso n, Bazil, Worthy,
NOES: Crabb.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Miller, Larkin.
USE VARIANCE NO 686 To allow the construction of
Applicant: D. N. Schneider Co. 4 dwelling apartment units'
on lots in'a''ptoposed-sub-
division containing less
than the required area in the R-2 Two Family Residence District.
Located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and Florida
Street and legally described as Lots, 1, 2,, 3, 4 6,,' 7,1 8, and
9, Tentative Tract No 5502.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
The Planning Director informed
the Commision that under the present R-2 Zone, the subdivider
could build 45 units without subdividing the.22 acres of land.
He further pointed out that a total of 35 units is proposed
and the reason for the variance is because the lot area per
dwelling unit is slightly less than the required 2000 sq. ft.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL
AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE 686 UPON THE
FOLLOWING CONDITION'�
1. The design of the tract shall be revised by rotating,the
plan 90 to have the cut. -de -sac street intersecting Utica
Street rather than Florida Street and the ,,proposed alley
shall be located along .the west side of the tract and
shall be terminated with a standard"turn-around.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
-4-
2/18/64
Page #5
Minutes: -H. B. Planningg Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
321
ZONE CASE NO 0//6- Change of Zone from R-1 Single
Initiated by Resolution Family Residence District to
of Intent _ R-2 Two Family Residence District.
Located on the north -side of
Heil Avenue and 860 feet west -of
Bolsa Chica Street and legally described as the west 528.01
feet of the east 1388.01 feet of the S 2,' S Z, NE-, Section
20-5-11, -also Lots 1 thru 6, 1"1 th ru 23, and 27 thru.38 of
Record of Survey 3-21.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment,_the hearing was closed.
The Commission held a lengthy,
discussion. It was noted that the subject property is adjacent
to,an existing R-2 to the east and to the south is a 20 acre
parcel of land which was approved, for an R-2 zone.
RESOLUTION NO 415 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Recommending Approval of
Zone Case No 415 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LARKIN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 415 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 415 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
FOLLOWING REASONS:
I.,,,The rezoning of ..this area is in conformance with the
Master Plan of Land Use.
2. Property to the east is developed to R-2 zoning standards
and property across the street to the south was recently
approved for -an R-2 Zone.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson,'Bazi1, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE RESOLUTION WAS•ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 418 ' ' Change" of Zone from A-1-X
Applicant: Lon E. Peek, Sr. General Agricultural District
as adopted by Interim Ordinance
No 668 to R-2 Two'Family
Residence District. Located at the northwest corner of Heil
Avenue and Goldenwest Street and legally described as:
PARCEL I: The SE4, NE4, Section 22-5-11. PARCEL II: The
E 2, Eli, SW4, NE 4, Section 22-5-11.
The Secretary read a letter
submitted by the applicant requesting a continuance of Zone
Case No 418 for 90 days.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY
AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO MAY 19, 1964.
ROLL ,CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT:. Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
-5- 2/18/64
322 Page #6
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
ZONE CASE NO 419 Change of Zone from R-1 Single
Applicant: Huntington" Family Residence'District
Harbour Corporation to R-3 Limited Multiple
Family Residence District
and C-3 General Business
District with setback provisions. Located at the northeast
and southeast corner of Admiralty Drive°and Pacific Coast
Highway 101 Alt., and legally described as a portion of Section
19-5-11.
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Martin Fenton, representing the Hu.ntirigton
Harbour Development,' addressed the Commission and gave his
reasons for the requested zone change.
W. C. Payne, Jr.-, resident
of Huntington Harbour, addressed the Commission and vigorously
opposed the subject zone change, He further requested that.
the hearing be continued for 60 days to give enough time for
the homeowners in Huntington Harbour to study the proposal.
There being no other comment,
the hearing was closed.' The Planning Director informed the
Commission that a' large portion -of the subject 'property= was
zoned C-2 prior to annexation. He further pointed out that
the requested C-3 allows many types of uses which would not -
be suitable for the area and required off-street parking in
the C-3 zone is not adequate.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER
AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO MARCH 3, 1964.
A further discussion was
held regarding the continuance to later date.
It was the.concensus to
reconsider the action of Zone Case No 419.
A MOTION BY MI LIE R AND
SECONDED BY CRABB,TO RE -CONSIDER THE ACTION WAS CARRIED.
A FURTHER MOTION WAS MADE
BY MILLER AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO
MARCH 17, 1964.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 420 Change of Zone' from M-1-A
Applicant: Irving B: Meyer Restricted Manufacturing
and Cedric E. Sanders District to R-3 Limited
Multiple Family Residence
District. Located appr oxi-
mately 660 feet south of Hamilton Avenue and .,,we-st of Brookhurst
Street and legally described as a portion of the NE4, SE4 of
Section 18-6-10. Further legal description on file in the
Planning Department Office.
-6- 2/18/64
Page #7
Minutes: H. B. Planningg Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
322
The hearing was opened to,the
audience. Cedric Sanders, agent for the applicant, addressed
the Commission and ' offered to, answer questions.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
The Commission held a discussion.
It was noted that this request is in conformance with the
Master Plan.._
RESOLUTION NO 420 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Recommending Approval of
Zone Case No 420 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB
AND.SECONDED BY MILLER TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 420 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL.OF ZONE CASE NO 420 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
FOLLOWING REASON :
1. The request is in conformance with the Master.Plan of
Land Use.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Miller, Worthy.
NOES: Larkin.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 683 To allow an 8 foot rear yard
Applicant: James'L. Stinson setback in deviation to the'
15 foot rear yard setback in
the R-1 Single Family Residence
District: Located on the north side of Heil Avenue and approxi-
mately 100 feet west of Del Mar Lane and legally described
as Lot 2, Tract 3753.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. James Stinson, applicant, addressed the Commission
and spoke in favor of the subjectvariance.
There being no other comment,
the hearing was closed.
It was noted that the applicant
will have an adequate rear yard area,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 683.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kauf man.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
-7- 2/18/64
3` age #8
Minutest H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
AREA VARIANCE NO 684 To allow the construction of
Applicant: Betty L. Fli.ppin a room addition to encroach
to within. 14 feet,. of the
rear property line in devia-
tion to the required 20 foot rear yard setback in the R-1
Single Family Residence District. Located on the north side of
Alhambra Drive and approximately 200 feet.west of Mark Lane,
and legally described as Lot 60, Tract`4213.
The hearing was opened to
the audience; there being.no comment, the hearing was closed.
The Planning Director pointed
out that the subject case is very similar to many others previously
approved by the Commission and that the applicant will have an
adequate rear yard area.
,. A MOTION -WAS MADE BY MILLER
AND SECONDED BY LARKIN'TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 684.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil; Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: 'Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 685 To allow the construction
Applicant: Norman C. Lawson of a room addition to
encroach to within 11 feet
of the rear property line
in deviation to the required 20 foot rear,, -yard setback in•the
R-1 Single Family Residence•District".' Located on the east —-
side of La Salle Lane and approximately 360 feet south of
Cornell Drive, and legally described as Lot 217, Tract 3846.
The hearing was opened to.
the audience; there being no comment, the'hearing was°closed.,
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY
AND SECONDED BY MILLER TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 685.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
USE PERMIT NO 235 To allow the construction
Applicant: Henry N. Stout of a 4 unit store building
in the C-4 Highway Com-.
ue rcial District. Located
at the southxest corner of,Beach Boulevard and Glencoe Avenue
and legally described as Lots 11 and 12, Tract 522.
The hearing was opened to
the audience; there being no comment, it was closed.
The Secretary informed the
Commission that the applicant submitted plans on June 18, 1963,
and at that time the Commission denied the request for the
proposed development because of inadequate turning radius for
the parking in front of the proposed building and the drive
-8- 2/18/64
Page #9
325
Minutes: H. B. Planhingg Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
approach onto Glencoe Street which was below City Standards.
Since then the applicant has submitted a• revised plan pro-
- viding for the previous requirements.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LARKIN TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO 235 WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: '
1. Improve Beach Boulevard to City Standards.
2. Improve Glencoe Street to City Standards if grades can
be established by the City Engineer.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None. -
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 414 Proposed Amendment to the Master
Revised Master Plan of Plan of Land Use, Study Area I,
Land Use, Study Area I encompassing that portion of the
City lying within the area east of
Beach Boulevard and south of Ellis
Avenue.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being'n6"comment, the hearing was closed.
The Secretary pointed out to the
Commission that the reason for revising the adopted Master
Plan of Land Use is because the recent changes ift the area
south of Atlanta Avenue which was approved by the City Council
for multiple family development.
Commission discussion was held. It
was the concensus to defer the action until after the discussion
meeting with the School District, City Council and Planning
Commission on February 27,'1964.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO MARCH 3, 1964.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb; Letson; Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin. -
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kauf man .
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 416 Change of Zone from M-1-0 and 'M-1
Initiated by Resolution Light Industrial District, M-1-A-0
of Intent _ and M-1-A Restricted Manufacturing
District, M-2-0 Heavy Industrial
District, R-1 Single Family Residence
District and A-1-Y General Agricultural District'as adopted
by Interim Ordinance No 672 to R-A-O Residential Agricultural
District; • ALSO from M-1 and M-1-0' Light Industrial District
M-2-0 Heavy Industrial District and R-1 Single Family Residence
District to M-1-A-0 Restricted Manufacturing District; ALSO
-9- 2/18/64
326
Page #10
Minutes: II. B. Planning Commission
Tmsday, February 18, 1964
from M-1-A Restricted Manufacturing District to RA Residential
Agricultural District. General location being on.the south.
side of Indianapolis Avenue, east of Beach' Boulevard, west of
the Huntington Beach City limits and north of Pacific Coast,
Highway,.
The ,hearing was opened to
the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.,
The Secretary informed the
Commission that the reason for changing certain zones in the
general area south of Indianapolis Avenue and east of Beach
Boulevard is because of recent requests for more R-3 multiple
fieve lopment .
It was the concensus to
defer action until after the discussion meeting to be held
on February 27, 1964.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None. -
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE N0. 417 Proposed amendment of certain
Revision of R-Zones sections of the Huntington,
Initiated by Resolution
of Inhefit Beach Ordinance Code re-
garding the RA, Rl, R2,_R3,
and R-4 Zones.
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Roger Watson, 1708 Beach Boulevard, addressed
the Commission.and„stated that the proposed ddnsity in the
R-Zones is too great., He further opposed the suggested square
footage in the R-3.and R-4 Zones, and recommended that an R-3
zone be,reduced to 1000 sq. ft. instead of the,proposed 1500
sq. ft. and R-4 to 800 sq. ft. instead of the proposed 100 sq. ft.
The Vice -Chairman, re,quested
that the Secretary explain each R-Zone separately to the
audience so there would not be any misinterpretation of the
various proposals.
R-1 ZONE" -Revised The Secretary gave a resume
of the proposed revisions.
The hearing on the proposed
R-1 Zone was opened to the audience; there being no comment,
the hearing .was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB
AND SECONDED BY`BAZIL TO'RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
REVISION OF THE 'R,1 ZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
-10- 2/18/64
Page #11 327
Minutes: H. B. Planningg Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
R-2 ZONE - Revised The Secretary gave a resume of the
proposed revision.
The hearing _was opened to the
audience. George Wood, 15441 Duke Circle, addressed the
Commission and,spoke in favor of the proposed revision of all
R-Zones.
Louis Mattis, 985 Tuxedo Circle,
Palm Springs, addressed the Commission and objected to the
proposed change in density.
Clark Harshfield, owner of a 5 acres
parcel north,of Heil Avenue, addressed theCommission and opposed
the change of density in the .R-2 zone.
Henry Figy, 6001 Royalist Drive,
addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposed
R-Zone revisions.
George Galkin, 305 Main Street,
addressed the Commission and questioned,the density in the
"old part of town".
Don Snyder, Fullerton, Addressed the
Commission and requested that an effective date of the proposed
ordinance is extended for a period of 3 to 5 months.
Cedric Sanders, Newport Beach,
addressed the Commission and stated that he is concerned with
the proposed lot coverage. He further recommended,that•the.
effective date of the ordinance be at least in 6 months.
There being no further comment, the
hearing.on the R-2 Zone was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER AND
SECONDED BY -WORTHY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
REVISION OF THE R-2 ZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb,-Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
R-3 ZONE - Revised The Secretary gave a resume of the
proposed revision in the R-3 Zone.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Fire Chief Higgins addressed the Commission and
pointed out the problem of construction of large apartment
projects with inadequate. access for emergency equipment. He
further stated that it is impossible to get fire equipment'
.into areas that are more than 150 feet from the street which
will result'in higher insurance rates and greater expense to
the City for fire protection.
-11- 2/18/64
�2, a e #12
Minutes! H. B. Planning'Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
Carlos Reeves, 213 Main
Street, addressed the Commission and stated that the east side
of town is not included -'in the preferential treatment as the west
side of town.
Harry LeBard, 419 - 9th
Street, addressed the Commission and questioned various°proposed
revisions.
Norman Visca,,15892 Willett
Lane, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of R-3Zone
Revisions.
There being no further
comment, the hearing on the R-3 Zone was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
BAZIL AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE
PROPOSED REVISION OF THE R-3 ZONE TO THE CITY°COUNCIL WITH
THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:
1. The maximum density shall not exceed one dwelling -unit -
for each 1250 sq. ft. of lot area.
2. The ground floor area of all roofed structures shall not
occupy more than 60% of the lot. area.
3. The minimum rear yard shall be 6 feet where a 20 foot alley
is provided and in, all cases the reshall be a -minimum 25
foot turning radius.
4. Twenty or more units may be permitted on any one parcel
of land containing sufficient area subject to the approval
of a Use Permit.
5. Any development which extends more than 150 feet in depth
from a public street shall be subject to the approval of
a Use Permit.
6. Driveways and driveway easements exceeding 150-f eet in
length shall be 25 feet'wi.de.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
R-4 ZONE - Revised - .- The Secretary gave a resume
Of the proposed revision in
the R-4 Zone.
The hearing was opened to
the audience. Oscar Taylor, Newport Beach, addressed the'
Commission and vigorously objected to.the proposed lot coverage,
setbacks and other proposed revisions in -the R-3 and R-4 Zones.
Warren.Hubert, representing
Macco Realty Co., addressed the Commission and questioned the
R-1 PD-5 Planned Development Ordinance.
-12- 2/18/64
Page #13 329
Minutes: H. B. Planni gg Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
Dorothy Jordan, 910 Orange
Avenue, addressed the Commission and recommended that more
interior yards for patios be -allowed rather than the proposed
front yard setbacks.
Stan Orsborn, representing -the
Orange County Home Builders Association, addressed the
Commission and gave his compliments to the Staff and
Commission for the excellent work in preparing the proposed
ordinance.
Lonny Fraizer, 124 7th St.,
addressed`,the Commission and objected to the proposed revision
of setbacks in the R-4 Zone.
There being no other comment, the
hearing on the R-4 Zone was closed._
A lengthy discussion was held by
the Commission. It was the concensus to modify certain
proposed revisions in the R-4 Zone.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
REVISION OF THE R-4 ZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FOLLOWING
MODIFICATIONS:
1. The ground floor area of all roofed structures shall not
occupy'more than 65 % of the lot area.
2. The minimum front yard shall be 4 feet.
3. The .minimum interior side yard shall be 4 feet.
4. The 25 foot site angle at corners to be maintained.
5. Twenty or more units -may be permitted on any parcel of
land containing sufficient area subject to the approval of
a Use Permit.
6. Any development which extends more than 150 feet in depth
from a public street shall be subject to the approval of
a Use Permit. 1.
7. Driveways and driveway easements exceeding 150-'feet in
length shall be 25 feet wide.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman. ,
THE MOTION CARRIED.
RA Zone - Revised The Secretary gave a resume of the
proposed revision in.the RA Resi
dential Agricultural District. '
The hearing was opened to - the
and fence; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
-13- 2/18/64
3� Page #14
Minutes! H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER
AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
REVISION OF THE RA ZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb,'Letso n, Bazil, Worthy, Miller; Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kauf man
THE MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO 417 A Resolution of the City Planning Com-
mission Recommending Approval of Zone -
Case 417.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MILLER
AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 417 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 417 PERTAINING TO THE REVISIONS OF
THE R-ZONES TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
DIVISION OF LAND NO 212 To allow the Division of land
Applicant: Classic'Development (Change of Lot Lines)
CoK2oration between -Lots 52 and 53 and
Lots 45 and 46, Tract 4761,
Huntington Harbour. .
The hearing was opened to
the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
WORTHY AND•SECONDED BY CRABB TO'RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DIVISION
OF,LAND NO 212 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin'.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
COMMUNICATION: The Secretary read a letter
submitted'by Walker Oil
Company requesting a change in the location of the block wall
to make the distance •from the- north property line to the block
wall 27 feet instead.of the 20 feet as approved by the Planning
Commission on January 21, 1964.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL
AND SECONDED BY•MILLER TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.
-14- 2/18/64
331
Page #15
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tmsday, February 18, 1964
COMMUNICATION: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Secretary read a communication
submitted -by the Orange County Planning Commission regarding
Use Variance No 5299 to"allow-the remodeling'of-an existing
sip.gle family dwelling with attached garage ,in the C-2 General
Business District. Located at the westerly corner of 5th
Street and Coast Highway in Sunset Beach.
After considerable discussion, it
was the'iananimous recommendation that the request be denied.
It was the concensus that the overcrowding of lots and the
conjestion of the streets should not be encouraged.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO INSTRUCT THE SECRETARY TO WRITE A LETTER
TO THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL
OF USE VARIANCE NO 5299.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: Miller.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION: The Commission held a discussion
regarding construction of any
apartment project consisting of 20 or more units and,also
any apartment project which extends more than 150 feet from
the public street.
It was the unanimous recommendation
of the Commission that a recommendation be -made to the City
Council to adopt an emergency ordinance that . TAvuld require a
Use Permit for construction of any apartment development
consisting of 20 or -more units.. It was further noted that
such an ordinance' would provide a -means for review of plans
for large projects which will result in better development
and assure more adequate emergency protection for the residents.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY CRABB TO RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF AN EMERGENCY
ORDINANCE THAT WOULD REQUIRE A USE PERMIT FOR ANY APARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 20 OR MORE UNITS OR FOR ANY APART -
DEVELOPMENT THAT EXTENDS MORE THAN 150 FEET FROM A PUBLIC
STREET TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
-15- 2/18/64
3� age #16
Minutes: H. B. Planning- Commission
Tuesday, February 18, 1964
COMMUNICATION: EXTENSION OF TIME, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 4805
Developer: Deane Brothers
The Secretary read,.a letter
submitted by Kenneth Carlson, engineer for the developer,
requesting an extension • of one year to ,enable , the developer,,,; -
to record the..Tract No 4805.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB
AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO RECOMMEND THAT THE EXTENSION OF TIME
BE GRANTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. Tract No 4805 shall be developed to single family homes and
that any change of use will necessitate submission of a
revised tentative map.
ROLL CALL VOTE:,
.AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazi1', Worthy', Miller, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Kaufman.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION: RE: PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL
USE VARIANCE NO 617, Applicant: L: E. Gates
- The Secretary informed the
Commission that the applicant has requested reduction of the
required 1 to 1 off-street parking for the existing convalescent
hospital which has been,previously approved by the Planning
Commission..;
The Commission considered
the request and it was the concensus that this particular use
did not need 1 to l.parking , therefore, the request was
approved for 2/3 spaces per bed.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
W. C. Warner
Secretary
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,
THE MEETING ADJOURNED TO:
FEBRUARY 25, 1964 at 7:30 P.M.
arry Le so
Vice-Ch irma
-16-
2/18/64