HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-03-03MINUTES
337
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 1964
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman,
Worthy, Larkin.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Miller.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5481
Number of Lots: 336 Subdivider: Huntington Harbour Corp.
Total Acreage: 81.287 Engineer: Moffatt & Nichol Engrs.
Located approximately 150 feet south
of Edinger Avenue and 2500 feet west of Algonquin Street
and legally described as being a subdivision of a portion
of fractional Section 19 and Section 20-5-11.
The Subdivision Committee Report
was read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. Mr. Martin Fenton, representing Huntington Harbour
Corporation, addressed the Commission and offered to answer
questions.
There being no other comment, the
hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5481
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The streets within the tract shall be connected to an
existing public street.
2. 11P1' Street shall be 60 feet wide.
3. Approval of this tract shall be subject to approval of
Conditional Exception UV #689 by the City Council. If
said Exception is not so approved, all lot sizes and
widths and all street widths shall comply with City
Standards.
4. All waterways shall be deeded in fee to the City.
5. The tract shall be annexed to the Harbor Maintenance
District now being formed.
6. All applicable standard subdivision requirements shall
be complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
3/3/64
c
Page #2
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION UV #689 To allow the sub -
Applicant: Huntington Harbour Corp. division and
development of the
property for use for
single family dwellings and appurtenant structures as follows:
1. On waterfront lots with a minimum area of 5000 square
feet per lot.
2. Reduction of lot frontages and street widths as,indicated
on Tentative Tract Map No 5481.
3. On waterfront lots (1 through 248, with the exception of
lots 32, 38, 56, 60, 77, 81°, 97, 101 116, 120, 164, 168,
181, 185, 200, 204, 220, 224 and 2415 a front yard setback
of 10 feet, except that the setback shall be 20 feet where
the garage is entered directly from the street: '
4. On waterfront lots ( lots 1 through 248) , a rear yard
setback of 10 feet from the bulkhead.
5. On non -waterfront lots, a front yard setback of 15 feet,
except that the setback shall be 20 feet where the garage
is entered directly from the street.
6. On non -waterfront lots, a rear yard of 20 feet, except
that one wing of the main building, not wider than 25% of
the narrowest width of the lot, may project to not less
than 10 feet from the rear property line.
7. On waterfront .and non-waterfront,lots, side yard setbacks
of 5 feet except that fireplaces may project 3 feet into
the required side yard for a maximum lineal distance of
10 feet.
The hearing was
opened to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing
was closed.
The Secretary
informed the Commission that this request is for continuation
of the same type of development as other units in the develop-
ment of Huntington Harbour.
A MOTION WAS MADE
BY LETSON AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION UV #689 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT 1,1AP NO 5483
Number of Lots: 255 Subdivider: Huntington Harbour Corp.
Total Acreage: 77.561 Engineer: Moffat & Nichol Engr.
Located south of
Edinger Avenue and west of Saybrook Lane and legally described
as being a subdivision of•a portion of fractional Sections 19
and 20-5-11.
The °Subdivision
Committee Report was read by the Secretary.
—2— 3/3/64
Page #3
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
339
The hearing was opened to'
the audience. Martin Fenton, representing Huntington Harbour,
addressed the Commission and objected to the requirement of
the dedication and improvement of Edinger Avenue to a width
of 64 feet south of the centerline: He further objected to'
the requirement of improving the streets on the north and
east sides of the school site stating that this is not a part
of the tentative -map.
Everett Peddicord, engineer
for the subdivider, addressed the Commission and displayed a
proposed plan for future dedication of 50 feet from centerline
on the south side of Edinger Avenue.
Bill Hartge, Deputy Director
of Public Works, addressed the Commission and stated that
the present plan indicates 30 feet right-of-way on the north
side`of Edinger Avenue and that a 56 foot right-of-way should
'be dedicated from centerline on the south side of Edinger
Avenue to provide six traffic lanes with no parking allowed
and that a 62 foot right-of-way should be dedicated to provide
six traffic lanes and one lane of parking.
There being no'other comment,
the hearing was closed.
The Commission held a lengthy
discussion. It was the concensus to continue the hearing to
March 17, 1964, for further study.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL
AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO MARCH 17,
1964, WITH THE CONSENT OF THE APPLICANT.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazi1, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION UV #690 To allow the subdivision
Applicant: Huntington Ha:�•bour and development of the
Corporation property for use for single
family dwellings and appurtenant
structures as follows:
1. On waterfront lots with a minimum area of 5000 square feet
per lot.
2. Reduction•of lot frontages and street widths as indicated
on Tentative Tract Map No 5483.
3. On waterfront lots (1 through 233, with the exception of
lots'18, 23, 39, 44, 60, 65, 82, 86, 100, 104, 121, 125,
142, 147, 163, 168, 188, 194, 209, 215, 226, 231) a front
yard setback of 10 feet, except that the setback shall be
20 feet where the garage is entered directly from the
street.
-3- 3/3/64
3�Q Page #4
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
4. On waterfront lots (1 through 233), a rear yard setback
of 10 feet from the bulkhead.
5. On non -waterfront lots, a front yard setback° of 15 feet,
except the setback shall be 20 feet where the garage is
entered directly from the street.
6. On non -waterfront lots, a rear yard of 20 feet, except
that one wing of the main building, not wider than 25%
of the narrowest width of the lot, may project to not
less than 10 feet from the rear property line.
7. On waterfront and non -waterfront lots, side yard setbacks
of 5 feet, except that fireplaces may project 3 feet
into the required side yard for a maximum lineal distance
of 10 ' feet .
The hearing was opened
to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was
closed.
The Secretary pointed
out to the Commission that the subject variance affects
Tract No 5483 and should be continued to March 17, 1964.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
CRABB AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL
EXCEPTION NO 690 TO MARCH 17, 1964.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 5128
Number of Lots: 178 Subdivider: The Meredith Co.
Total Acreage: 50 Engineer: Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson," Inc.
Located south of Adams
Avenue and east of Bro okhurst Street and legally described
as being a proposed subdivision of a portion of the NW4 of
Section 8-6-10.
The Subdivision Com-
mittee Report was read by the Secretary.
The hearing was opened
to the audience. Robert Gulino, engineer for the subdivider,
addressed the Commission and stated that there were no ob-
jections to the conditions stipulated in the Subdivision
Report.
There being no other
comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
CRABB AND SECONDED BY LETSON TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO 5128 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
-4- 3/3/64
Page #5 311
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
1. If Zone Case No 424 is not adopted by the City Council,
approval of this map shall be null and void.
2. The service road along Adams Avenue shall be extended
westerly to the west boundary of the tract.
3. The property line radius on : cul-de-sacs shall be 50 feet.
4. Lots 64 through 79 are not approved for construction
of residential buildings until such time as the Planning
Commission gives further consideration to a favorable
report from the Health Department concerning the reservoir
and chlorination facilities of the Talbert Irrigation
District.
5. A business license shall be secured for subdividing the
portion of the development covered by this revised
tentative map.
6. Approval of this revision shall not extend the date of
approval of that portion of the tract not included in
the revision.
7. All conditions of approval of the original tentative map
that are applicable to the revised portion shall be
complied with.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE ,CASE NO 424 . Change of Zone from A-1-Y
Applicant: The Meredith Co. General Agricultural District
as adopted by Interim Ordinance
No 672"to R-2 Two Family
Residence District. Located on the south side of Adams Avenue
and east side of Brookhurst Street and legally described as
being a portion of the NW-4 of Section 5-6-10.
The Secretary read a com-
munication submitted by the Huntington Beach Elementary School
Board of Trustees, opposing the subject zone change.
Robert Gulino, engineer for
the subdivider, addressed the Commission and stated that the
School District had no objections at the time of the Subdivision
Committee meeting on February 24,` 1964.
Richard Meredith, applicant,
addressed the Commission and explained why he is requesting
the R-2 Zone.
Robert Burke`, representing
the Huntington Beach Elementary School Board of Trustees,
addressed the Commission and stated that the increased
population density will result in an additional 241 elementary
school students,over those anticipated from the same property
zoned R-1.
There being no other -comment,
the hearing was closed.
-5- 3/3/64
942
Page #6
Minutesi H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
The Commission held a -
lengthy discussion. It was noted that this request was not
in conformance.with the Master Plan.
RESOLUTION NO 424 A Resolution of the City Planning Com-
BAZIL AND SECONDED
mission Recommending Denial of Zone
Case No 424 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS, MADE BY
BY IA RKIN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 424
RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ZONE CASE NO 424 TO THE CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
1. The Master Plan of Land Use has this area designated for
low density development.
2. A school site is being purchased in this area on the
basis of a single family tract development ,and •medium
density use would allow almost 300 more units which
would require another school site.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 4.21 Change of Zone from
Applicant: A. L. Gindling C-2 Community Business
District to R-3 Limited
Multiple Family Residence
District. Located on the east side of Springdale Street and
approximately 330 feet south of Bolsa Avenue and also on
the east side of Springdale Street and approximately 340 feet
north of Bolsa Avenue and -legally described as: PARCEL I:
Being a portion of the NA of Section 15-5-11 and PARCEL II:
Being a portion of the SWy of Section 10-5-11.
The Secretary read a
communication submitted by A. L. Gindling, applicant, requesting
continuance of Zone Case No 421 to April 7, 1964.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
WORTHY AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON ZONE
CASK NO 421 TO APRIL 7, 1964.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NCE S : None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 422 Change of Zone from A-1-X
Applicant: Gussie J. Kettler General Agricultural
% Howard K. Smith District as adopted
by Interim Ordinance
No 668 to C-2'Com-
munity Business District with setback provisions, and R-2
Two Family Residence District. Located at the southeast
corner of Heil Avenue and Springdale Street and legally
described as follows: PROPOSED C-2: The North 250 feet of
-6- 3/3/64
343
Page #7
Minutes: H. B. Planning Comfilission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
the West 250 feet of the A- NW4, SW4, Section 22-5-11.
PROPOSED R-2: The W-2j NW4, SW4 of Section 22-5-11;
except the North 250 feet of the West 250 feet thereof.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. John Baker, 6041 Doyle Drive, representing the
Homeowners -Association, addressed -the Commission -and sub-
mitted a petition signed by 158 property owners in the
immediate area opposing the requested change of zone.
Ernest Beleher, 4021 Cedar
Avenue, Long Beach, representing the applicant, addressed
the Commission and displayed sketches of the proposed
development.
John Mahoney, 6081 Doyle Drive,
addressed the Commission and stated that the area should be
an R-1 Zone.
Mr. Brenner addressed the
Commission and opposed the requested zone change.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
A lengthy discussion was held
by the Commission. It was the concensus that since the
proposed development was for a planned development it should
be considered as a variance.
RESOLUTION NO 422 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Recommending Denial of
Zone Case No 422 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LE TSON AND
SECONDED BY CRABB,TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 422 RECOMMENDING
DENIAL OF ZONE CASE NO'422, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, TO THE CITY
COUNCIL, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
1. A Planned Development is proposed for this site which
would better be considered by variance.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NCE S : None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
A FURTHER MOTION WAS MADE BY
CRABB AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO DIRECT THE STAFF TO MAKE A
STUDY OF THE MASTER PLAN IN LIGHT OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
IN THE VICINITY OF SPRINGDALE STREET AND HEIL AVENUE.
ROLL CALL VOTE:'
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
-7- 3/3/ 64
3� Page #8
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
ZONE CASE NO 423 Change of Zone from
Applicant: �Akeley P. Quirk M-1-0 Light Industrial
District combined with
oil production to R-3
Limited Multiple Family.Residence District. Located on the
west side of Newland Street and approximately 700 feet north
of Hamilton Avenue and legally described as Lot ll,•Tract
No 811 and Lots No 1.through 30 inclusive in -Block C, Tract
No 876.
The Secretary read a,
communication submitted by the Huntington Beach Elementary
School District Board of Trustees opposing the subject zone
change.
The hearing was opened
to the audience.
Mr. Quirk, applicant,
addressed the Commission and requested that Zone Case No 423
be approved.
Robert Himrod, representing
the co -owners of the subject property, addressed the Com-
-mission and spoke in favor of changing the ,zone to R-3. .
Charles Palmer,
representing the Huntington Beach Elementary School District,
addressed the Commission and explained the problems with which
the school district would be confronted if the zone change is
adopted.
A. C. Marion, representing
the Huntington Beach Oil Producers, -addressed the Commission
and suggested that the 110Y be added on the requested R-3 Zone.
There being no other
comment, the hearing was closed,
The Secretary informed
the Commission that Zone Case No 414 and 416 being relative
to the subject zone case will be considered later in the agenda.
It was the concensus that
action should be deferred until Zone Case No 414 and Zone Case
No 416 have been considered.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
CRABB AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO DEFER ACTION ON ZONE CASE NO
423 UNTIL AFTER ZONE CASE NO 414 AND ZONE CASE NO 416 HAD
BEEN CONSIDERED.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
After consideration of
Zone Cases 414 and 416, the Commission again discussed Zone
Case 423.
-8 3/3/64
Page #9 345
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LARKIN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 423 RECOMMENDING
DENIAL OF ZONE CASE NO 423 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
FOLLOWING REASON: -
1. The Revised Master Plan of Land Use, as modified, has
this area designated for industrial development.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 425 Change of Zone (Pre -zoning)
Applicant: Bolsa Properties from R-4 Suburban Residential
Incorporated District (County) to R-3
Limited Multiple Family Residence
District. Located on the east
side of Green Street and approximately 660 feet north of
Warner Avenue and legally described as the South 82.5 feet
of Lot 1, Block 16, Tract 86.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
The Commission held a discussion.
It was noted that property to the north from the subject zone
case was approved for an R-3 zone.
RESOLUTION NO 425 A Resolution of the City Planning
Commission Recommending Approval of Zone
Case 425 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LARKIN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 425 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 425 (PRE -ZONING) TO -THE CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
1. Property to the north has just been approved for R-3 high
density zoning.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 687 To allow the construction of a
Applicant: Charles R. Furr room addition to 'a main dwelling
to be located 10 feet from a
rear dwelling in deviation to
the required 15 feet in the R-2 Two Family Residence District.
Located on the west side of California Street and approximately
110 feet south of Knoxville Avenue and legally described as
Lots 5 and 6, Block 1103, Vista Del Mar Tract.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, it was closed.
-9- 3/3/64
,.3l �yPage #10
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
CRABB AND SECONDED BY BAZIL TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE -NO 687.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letso n, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 688 To allow the construction
Applicant: W. B. Harrell of a dwelling unit over
an existing garage which
has a 1 foot setback
from the side property line in deviation to the required 4 foot
side yard setback in the R-4-0 Multiple Family Residence District.
Located at 215 8th Street and legally described as Lots 13 and
15, Block 208, Huntington Beach Tract.
The Secretary read a
letter submitted by Mrs.'Dorcas Davis De Jong opposing the
subject variance.
The hearing was opened
to the audience. Paul Critty, 215 8th Street, addressed the
Commission and stated that the proposed apartment addition will
include a second story which will be set in 3 feet over the
existing garage.
There being no other
comment, the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
BAZIL AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 688.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: . Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin;,.
NOES: None.
r
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 691 To allow the construction
ADlicant: Denny Eichbere: of a room addition to
within 10 feet of, the
rear property line in
deviation to the required 20 foot rear yard setback in the R-1
Single Family Residence District. Located at the southwest
corner of Marseille Drive and Barcelone Lane and legally
described as Lot 46, Tract 3953.
The hearing was opened
to the audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
The Planning Director
pointed out that the subject variance is very similar to many
others previously approved by the Commission and that the
applicant will have an adequate rear yard area.
-10- 3/3/64
Page #11
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
347
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WORTHY
AND SECONDED BY LARKIN TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 691.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 692 To allow a 15 foot rear yard
Applicant: Mervin B. Johnson setback in deviation to the
required 20 foot rear yard
setback in the R-1 Single
Family Residence District. Located on the east side of
Cannery Street and approximately 1064 feet south of Hamilton
Avenue and legally described as Lots 17 and 32, Tract 5251.
The hearing was opened to the
audience. A Gentleman, representing the applicant, addressed
the Commission and gave his reasons for the request.
There being no further comment,
the hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY LARKIN TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 692.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
AREA VARIANCE NO 693 To allow the construction of
Applicant: Burtis W. a room addition to within 10
VerHaar. Jr. feet of the rear property
line in deviation to the
required 20 foot rear yard
setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located
on the south side of Donald Circle and approximately 80 feet
west of Lucia Lnne and legally described as Lot 23, Tract 3440.
The Secretary read a letter
submitted by Daniel' L. Radabatigh, adjacent property owner,
favoring the subject variance.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, it was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL
AND SECONDED BY WORTHY TO APPROVE AREA VARIANCE NO 693.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: -Crabb, Letson, Bazi1,• Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.'
-11- 3/3/64
348 Page #12
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
USE VARIANCE NO 694 To allow the construction
Applicant: E. Scott of 65 units rather than the
63 units allowed under the
present R-4-X Suburban
Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668.
Located on the north side of Talbert Avenue and approximately
800 feet west of Beach Boulevard.and legally described as the
east 10 acres of the west 15 acres of the south 20 acres of
the SE 4, SE 4, Section 26-5-11.
The hearing -was opened to
the audience. Stan Scherer, representing the applicant,
addressed the Commission and stated that there were no
objections to 'the required c6nditions.
the hearing was closed.
There being no other comment,
A*MOTION WAS MADE BY
WORTHY AND SECONDED BY LARKIN TO APPROVE USE VARIANCE NO 694
UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Dedicate and improve Talbert Avenue
Standard.
2. Participate in drainage assessment
$1650 per acre.
to a Primary Highway°
district at a cost of
3. Provide a copy of the easement along the westerly line
of the property.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazi1, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
ZONE CASE NO 414 Continued
REVISED MASTER PLAN OF LAND
USE -STUDY AREA I
lying within the area east of
Ellis Avenue.
Proposed amendment to the
Master Plan of Land Use,
Study Area I, encompassing
that portion of the city
Beach Boulevard and south of
The hearing was opened to
,the audience. Mr. Palmer, representing the Huntington Beach
Elemtary School District, addressed the Commission and voiced
concern over the higher density indicated on the revised
Master Plan.
There being no other comment,
the hearing was closed.
A lengthy discussion was
held by,the Commission. It was the concensus to delete the
medium density at the northwest corner of Banning Avenue and
Bushard Street and also at the southwest corner of Hamilton
Avenue and Bushard Street. It was further agreed that the
area west of Newland Street and approximately 460 feet south
of Atlanta Avenue be recommended for Industrial and also the
area south of Atlanta Avenue to Hamilton Avenue and west of
Cannery Street be recommended for Industrial.
-12- 3/3/64
Page #13 349
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Ttnsday, March 3, 1964
RESOLUTION NO 414 A Resolution of the City Planning Com-
mission Recommending Approval of,Zone
Case No 414 to the City Council.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CRABB AND
SECONDED BY BAZIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 414 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 414 AS AMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
ZONE CASE NO 416 - Continued Change of Zone from M-1-0
Resolution of Intent and M-1 Light Industrial
District, M-1-A-0 and M-1-A
Restricted Manufacturing
District, M-2-0 Heavy Industrial District, R-1 Single Family
Residence District and A-1-Y General Agricultural District as
adopted.by Interim Ordinance No 672 to R-A-O Residential
Agricultural District. ALSO from M-1 and M-1-0 Light Industrial
District, M-2-0 Heavy Industrial District and R-1 Single
Family Residence District to M-1-A-0 Restricted Manufacturing
District. ALSO from M-l-A Restricted Manufacturing District
to RA Residential Agricultural District. General location
being on the south side of Indianapolis Avenue, east of Beach
Boulevard, west of the Huntington Beach City limits and north
of Pacific Coast Highway.
The Secretary read a letter
submitted by Buchanan -Hudson Development Col, requesting that
the Commission give a consideration to the elimination of the
110" designation on property located 660 feet south of Hamilton
Avenue and on the east side of Bushard Street.
The hearing was opened to the
audience; there being no comment, the hearing was closed.
The Secretary informed the
Commission that the reason for changing certain zones in
the general area south of Indianapolis Avenue and east of
Beach Boulevard is because of recent requests for more R-3
multiple development.
It was the concensus that the
parcel on the west side of Brookhurst, 660 feet south of
Hamilton Avenue be deleted because of recently approved R-3
zoning and to delete the 11011 designation as requested by Mr.
Buchanan. Also property on the west side of Newland Street,
460 feet south of Atlanta Avenue and on the west side of
Cannery Street from Atlanta to Cannery Street,be left in the
present industrial zoning.
RESOLUTION NO 416 A Resolution of the City Planning Com-
mission Recommending Approval of Zone
Case No 416 to the City Council.
-13- 3/3/64
350 Page #14
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, March 3, 1964
A MOTION WAS MADE BY
BAZIL AND SECONDED BY CRABB TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 416 RECOM-
MENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE NO 416, AS AMENDED, TO THE CITY
COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Crabb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Larkin.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Miller.
THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED.
COMMUNICATION: The Secretary read a
letter submitted by
property owners within the Seahaven Tract requesting that the
Planning Commission institute action for re -zoning the area
east of Cannery Street and approximately 1024 feet south of
Adams Avenue from R-4-Y to R-1.
ON MOTION BY LETSON
AND SECONDED BY LARKIN, THE COMMUNICATION FROM THE HOMEOWNERS
WITHIN THE TRACT NO 4284 WAS RECEIVED AND ORDERED FILED.
MOTION CARRIED.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,
THE,MEETING ADJOURNED.
W. C. Warner Hen r K ufma
Secretary Chairman
-14- 3/3/64