The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1965-03-31MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Conference Room, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Wednesday, March 31, 1965 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: John Mandrell, Herbert Day, Richard Harlow BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: None. MINUTES: The minutes of March 24, 1965) were accepted as transcribed. USE PERMIT NO 65-2 Applicant: Rev. Frank Brickley To permit the building of a church and educational facilities in the R-4-X Suburban Residential District. LoQated 580 feet east of Beach Boulevard and 640 feet north of Garfield Avenue and legally described as the SW4, NE4, SW4, SW4, Section 36-5-11. The hearing was opened to the audience. Edward Illig, 3577 N. Figueroa, Los Angeles, addressed the Board and questioned the landscaping as shown on the plan. It was his suggestion that a specific landscape plan of the entire project be submitted for review before the pm ject was built. Rev. Brickley, applicant, explained that it was their intent to provide sufficient landscaping to complement the project. Sid Sybrandy, architect, addressed the Board and explained their plans for future expansion of the project. At ---this time the conditions of approval`we-re presented. Mr. Sybrandy asked that the west wall required in Condition #7 be deleted because of the future expansion plans. There being no further comment, the hearing was closed. Board discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY DAY AND SEO)NDED BY HARLOW TO APPROVE UP 65-2 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The water, sewer -and -fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works` and Fire Department 2. Provide -sufficient evidence that the 40 foot alley located at the southeast corner of the parcel provides access to the subject property for Ellis Avenue. Said alley shall be paved to Building Department standards to a minimum width of 24 feet. 3. The alley shown on the east side of the parcel shall be private. 4. Dedicate to City Standards the proposed Constantine Drive adjacent to,the project or wait for the formation of the proposed improvement district. -1- 3/31/65 Page #2, MINUTES, March 31, 1965 5. Off-street parking facilities including landscaping, number, arrangement, access, paving and striping of all parking spaces shall meet the provisions of Section 9201.35 and the latest adopted Planning Commission Standards. 6. The necessary provisions for solving the drainage problems in the area shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works. 7. A masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property lines to City Standards. Said wall shall be 6 feet in height. 8. A soil report by an approved soils engineer shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. A plan of grading and bank protection shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works and the Department of Building and Safety for approval. 10. No structures, other than those shown on the approved plot plan which are indicated for immediate construction, shall be constructed within the project. 11. A landscape plan shall be submitted for approval by the Building Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 12. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with all condi- tions attached to the granting of UP 65-2 shall constitute grounds for the revocation of said Use Permit by the City Council. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Mandrell, Day, Harlow. NOES: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. USE PERMIT NO 65-3 Applicant: Ronald Brunswick To permit the construction of 30 units, some of which will extend more than 150 feet from a public street, in the R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. Located on the east side of Oak Street approximately 300 feet south of Cypress Avenue and* legally described as the WZ of Lots 4 and 5, Block D, Tract 436. the audience. The hearing was opened to Ronald Brunswick, applicant, addressed the Board and presented revised plans which corrected the dimensions of the parcel. comment, the hearing was closed. There being no further Board discussion followed. A MOTION BY DAY WAS SECONDED BY MANDRELL TO APPROVE UP 65-3 UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. A plan specifying trash pickup areas shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval. 2. The water, sewer and fire hydrant system shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. 3. Oak Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to City Standards. Improvements shall include street trees and street lights. -2- 3/31/65 Page #3, Minutes, March 31, 1965 4. Off-street parking facilities including landscaping, number, arrangement, access, paving and striping of all parking spaces shall meet all adopted ordinances and the latest adopted Planning Commission Standards. 5. No structures, other than those shoTn on the approved plot plan, shall be constructed within the project. 6. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach. 7. Sewage disposal shall.be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 8. The property shall participate in the local -drainage assessment district. 9. All provisions of the R3 Zone shall be met. 10. A new plot plan satisfying the above requirements shall be submitted to the Building Department for approval prior to the application for a building permit. 11. Failure to abide by and faithfully comply with all conditions attached to the granting of UP 65-3 shall constitute grounds for the revocation of said Use Permit by the City Council. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Mandrell, Day, Harlow. NOES: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE NO 65-7 Applicant: Mark Ramsey To allow one corner of an attached garage to set back 18 feet 6 inches from the ultimate right- of-way in deviation to the required 20 foot setback in the R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located on the southerly side of Sirius Drive between Bolero and Baruna{ Lanes and _legally described as Lot 26, Tract 5264, Huntington Harbour. The hearing was opened to the audience. Mark Ramsey, applicant, --addressed the Board and explained the reason. why the new application was filed. The reason being that in staking out the driveway apron it was found that the two required off -street -parking spaces with a minimum dimension of 20 feet in front of the garage could not be provided without decreasing the dimensions of the house itself. Stuart H. Zuck, prospective owner of the lot, addressed the Board. He stated that the house con- sisted of 3400 square feet and there were no other lots available in Huntington Harbour with a southerly exposure which would accommodate this particular plan. He also stated that he proposed a 3 car garage which would provide more off-street parking than required. hearing was closed. There being no further comment, the Board discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY HARLOW AND SECONDED BY DAY TO DENY AV 65-7 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: 1. This case had previously been considered by the Planning Commission and relief was granted conditioned upon the applicant providing two off-street parking spaces with a minimum dimension of 20 feet in front of the garage. In view of this decision an encroachment of an additional one and one-half feet could not be justified. -3- 3/31/65 Page #4, Minutes, March 31, 1965 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Mandre ll, Day, -Harlow., NOES: Nore . THE MOTION CARRIED. AREA VARIANCE NO 65-8 Applicant: Philip Thompson To allow the construction of a room addition 21 feet wide to encroach to within 16 feet of the rear property line on a .64 foot ._wide lot. -in the -R-1 Single Family Residence District. Located on the south side of. Sydney Drive approximately 70 feet west of Bolsa Park Lane and legally described as Lot 7, Tract 4575, otherwise known as 6102 Sydney Drive. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being no comment, it was closed. Board discussion followed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY HARLOW AND SECONDED BY DAY TO APPROVE AV 65-8 FOR THE -FOLLOWING REASON:- 1. The request is with in.the intent of Section 9103.423 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Mandrell, Day, Harlow. NOES: None. THE MOTION CARRIED. DIVISION,OF LAND NO 65-3 Applicant: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints To allow the division of land into two separate parcels. Located on the south side of Yorktown Avenue approximately 165 feet east of Huntington Street and legally described as: Parcel 1: the East 135 feet of Block 2403, East Side Villa Tract. Parcel 2: The West 165 feet of Block 2403, East Side Villa'Tract. The hearing was opened to the audience; there being -no comment, it was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MANDRELL AND SECONDED BY DAY TO APPROVE DV 65-3 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Yorktown Avenue shall be dedicated to City Standards. 2. Delaware Street, Yorktown Avenue and Huntington Street shall be improved to City -Standards at the .time the property is developed. Improvements shall include street trees, street lights and street signs. 3. All streets shall conform to City of Huntington Beach Standards. Master Plan of Arterial Street and Highways Standards shall apply where applicable. Street sections shall be determined by soil "R1' value and traffic index. 4. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach1s water system. 5. A domestic water system shall be installed at the time of development or fees paid. 6. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach's sewage system. 7. A sanitary sewer system shall be installed at the time of development or fees paid. -4- 3/31/65 Page #5, Minutes, March 31, 1965 8. Drainage of the property shall be approved by the Depart- ment of Public Works prior to issuance of a building pe rmit . 9. Retaining walls shall be provided where there is a difference in elevatirn of one (1) foot between adjoining lots or lots abutting City right-of-way. 10. Preliminary and final soil reports shall be submitted by an approved private soils engineer to the City prior to issuance of building permit. 11. The Division of Land shall not be effective until an agreement is signed and recorded agreeing to the conditions listed above. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Mandrell, Day, Harlow. N(E S : Nnne . THE MOTION CARRIED. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS TO COME BEFORE THE BOARD, A MOTION WAS MADE BY MANDRELL AND SECONDED BY HARLOW TO ADJOURN. 'Richard Harlow ohn Mandr ll Secretary hairman -5- 3/31/65