HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-08-24MINUTES
OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY', AUGUST 24,r1965, ADJOURNED MEETING - STUDY SESSION
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Lawson, Crabb.
SPECIAL STUDY -.WARNER AND GOLDENWEST
The Secretary explained that the
property covered by Zone Case No. 525 on the west side -of Goldenwest
Street, 900 ft. south of Warner Avenue, had prompted a special land
use study for the general area south of Heil Avenue, east of Edwards
Street, north of Slater Avenue and west of Gothard Street.
Floyd Belsito, Associate Planner,
addressed the Commission -and explained the present zoning, existing
land use, and Master Plan of Land Use for the area.
Mr. Belsito. pointed out two
alternatives for additional commercial zoning as determined'by
the Planning Department. These alternatives were based on the
required amount of commercial property necessary to serve the
ultimate population within the area. It was noted that of the
two alternatives, one dealt with one parcel, while the other
affected three parcels.
The Secretary noted that the proposed
Post Office is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, west
of Goldenwest Street. It will serve two functions: (1) as a Post
Office, (2) as a motor pool. He stated that the Post Office
property will have 260 ft. frontage on Warner Avenue and is
within the area master planned and zoned for Commercial.
Chairman Kaufman felt that a
zone for public buildings should be made. Further discussion followed
as to a Post Office being a commercial use.
The Secretary also stated that the
area master planned for commercial along -the north side of Warner
Avenue did not coincide with that property zoned for commercial.
-1- 8/24/65
P4gO No. 2
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, August 24, 1965
Chairman Kaufman preferred equal
frontage of commercial zoning on the north and south sides of
Warner Avenue.
proposal, would be adequate.
Discussion followed as to which
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY MILLER TO HAVE THE SECRETARY INSTRUCT THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO REVISE THE
MASTER PLAN OF LAND USE STUDY AREAS II.AND III.AND REPORT BACK
TO THE COMMISSION.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Bazil, Kaufman,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Lawson, Crabb.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
R-5 ZONE AMENDMENT
Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
The Secretary distributed copies
of a proposed amendment to Article 925. He explained the amendment
and pointed out -various proposed changes.
It was noted that this proposal
would delete multiple.family dwelling units from the R-5 zone and
add sanitariums, convalescent hospitals, and hospitals as permitted
uses subjeOt to a Use Permit.
Commission discussion:followed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BAZIL AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO RECOMMEND,APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
TO ARTICLE 925 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE TO THE CITY
COUNCIL.
ROLL CALL VOTE: -
AYES: Bazil, Kaufman,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Lawson, Crabb.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Worthy, Miller, Larkin.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PR GRAM.
The Secretary briefly explained
the Capital Improvements Program.
-2- 8/24/65
Page No. 3
Minutes H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, August 24, 1965
The Commission felt that the
format was good and that',a degree of clarity could be, added
through more explanation,in the text.
Mr. Arguello, Finance Director,
addressed the Commission'and~explained various charts in the
Preliminary Capital Improvements Program. He -pointed out'that
past years"were-used as a basis for'his estimates. It was noted
that.in the.future.the costs•of operating the City would be higher
than -.the revenue, received -from property -taxes. He further emphasized
the fact that'in later years bond issues will be necessary in order
to support any Capital Improvements Program. He requested that
"ADOPTED BUDGET": be". taken. out of 'tbe- estimates 'for Capital Improvements
because it was,not in the_adopt'ed budget"arid could"be misleading.
Mr.'Belsito, Associate Planner,
stated,that-this_,was based on'the assumption that a bond issue would
be approved this -Fiscal -Year.
Mr. Arguello also mentioned that
the Water Department is, -a separate'entity'and could be in a
pQsition-to: start paying the"City back this year: He further
stated that if . the Water Department 'did -not make money for 'the
City,'it would at least pay it's own way.
Chairman'Kaufman felt that site
acquisition should be the, primary factor for a"bond issue.
George Shibata, Asst. City Attbrney,,
explained that he had seen County.plans for a•"West Orange`County
Civic Center. He went on to say that'these plans�had••been,made
for a site in the City of Westminster:. He felt •that 'Huntington
Beach should submit a proposal to the County. The importanc-e of
a County Civic Center branch is eviden.ced.by the development of
Santa Ana, which is the County Seat.
Wil'lis`Warner, of Toups engineering,
asked several questions. He felt -that -some of •the estimates'
pertaining to construction costs and lan.decapIng wer.et lour.. He said;
the lowest possible, estimate for landscaping was 200 pex.,s'q,.,ft.
He further stated that this -report was a good start toward a worthwile
project.
-3- 8/24/65
Page No. 4
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, August 24, 1965
Mr. Belsito explained the Parks
and Recreation Capital Tzpr,ovements chart to the Commission.
Chairman Kaufman felt that a municipal
owned golf course was a good source of revenue for the City.
Further discussion followed.
Mr. Arguello said that the planned
parks would require additional maintenance and personnel and that
this was not included in his estimates.
Discussion followed pertaining to
whether manly small parks or a few large parks was of most benefit to
the City. Also the type of golf courses the City should construct
was discussed.
It was decided that further discussions
should be held up until clarification of the Parks and Recreation
Departments Program by Mr. Worthy, Director of Recreation, was
obtained,
Mr, Belsito.explained the break-
down on proposals for the Capital Improvements Program.
It was the consensus of the
Commission to establish a priority list at their meeting on
September'21, 1965,
MISCELLANEOUS:
The Secretary read a letter from
the City Clerk to all department heads and members of all boards and
commissions regarding the City Councills new policy that all press
releases regarding City policy on any matter shall be submitted
to the City administrator for approval before being released to the
press.
The Communication was received and
ordered filed.
The Secretary read various sections
from the Leaaue of California Cities Newsletter, dealing with newly
enacted State Laws which become effective September 17, 1965. These
-4- 8/24/65
Page No. 5
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesday, August 24, 1965
laws deal with subdivision requirements, zoning, and soil reports
which will be mandatory for all subdivisions unless deemed
unnecessary by the Departnent of Building and Safety.
George Shibata reported on his Commun-
ication with the State Lands Commission. He said that nothing definite
had been stated but that he should have the necessary information
regarding UP 65-15 by September 8, 1965.
Chairman Kaufman recommended that
Mr. Shibata ask the State Lands Commission to have.a reprosen.tative
pres.erit at., the Planning, Commission's s, Septemb.er 8, 1965, J,m'ee.ting.
Chairman Kaufman stated that a
meeting concerning a proposed desalinization plant will be held at
noon Thursday, August 26, 1965, at Sam's Seafood, by the Northwesterly
Orange County Coastal Coordinating Committee.
Chairman Kaufman explained the
proposal to the Commission..
Bill Hartge, Deputy Director of
Public Works, said that Bechtel Corporation had an application on
file in the Engineering Department toy begin test drilling for the
off -shore desalinization plant. It was noted that the proposal will
be in conjunction with a marina and it will probably be a combined
government -private enterprise operation. He also stated that erosion
had stopped in Surfside and that the Corps of Engineers erosion
experts would study erosion of the beach in Huntington Beach. He
reported that it would take approximately two years to arrive at any
conclusion,
Discussion of jurisdiction followed.
It was the consensus of the
Commission to request the City Council to institute proceedinggfor
annexation of the property.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KAUFMAN AND
SECONDED BY WORTHY TO HAVE THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ANNEX
THE BEACH AND WATER FROM WARNER AVENUE TO SEAL BEACH AND FROM OCEAN
AVENUE TO THE THREE MILE LIMIT.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Bazil, ..Kaufm.an, Worthy, Miller, Larkin..
NOES : .None
_5_ 9/24/65
Wage No, 6
Minutes: H. B. Planning Commission
Tuesaay, August 24, 1965
ABSENT: Lawson, Crabb
THE MOTION CARRIED.
K, A, Reynolds
Secretary
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS,
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED.
Henry KOLdfman
Chairman
8/24/65