HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-06-08414,
H. B. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
MINUTES
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT John Mandrell,
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
AREA VARIANCE NO. 66-37 - continued -
Applicant - Forbeck-Montgomery
Conference Room, City Hall
Huntington Beach California
Wednesd'ay, June d. 1966
Herbert Day, Richard Harlow.
To allow the construction of
an 81-high block wall on the east and west side property lines,
in deviation to the 61 height -limit. Located on the north side
of Morningstar Drive, 400' west of Edgewater Lane and legally
described as Lot 75 of Tract 5360.-
Richard Harlow, Secretary, read
a letter from the applicant,-Forbeck-Montgomery, requesting
withdrawal of their request.
- A MOTION WAS MADE BY-HARLOW
AND SECONDED BY DAY TO APPROVE SHE APPLICANTS REQUEST TO
WITHDRAW AREA VARIANCE NO. 66-37.
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Mandrell, Day, Harlow.
NOES:_ None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED._
USE PERMIT'NO 66-I6 - continued
Applicant - Church of the -Nazarene
4 = To allow construction of"a-church
and educational facilities in the R4-X Suburban*Residential
District. Located 580' east of Beach Boulevard and 6401 north
of Garfield Avenue and legally described -as the SW4, NE4, SW-4
SW4 of Section 36-5-11...
John Mandrell felt that drainage
of the property presented a problem due to the possible failure
of the Flood Control Bond election.
Rev. Brickley, -the applicant,
stated that he f< access to the property did not present a
problem in this area. He also stated that drainage,was not
a problem and unless there would-be a tremendous rain, this
area would not be affected.
Rev. Brickley stated that the
maximum church capacity would be 175 to 180 persons, which would
require parking for_. approximately 60: automobiles . - -
H8 also informed the Board that
the church would face -towards Constantine Drive as,shown on the
Precise Plan for the-accessment district. -
Paul Co#, Traffic Engineer,
reviewed the request and stated that the proposed use will not
present a traffic problem.
The Board members discussed the'_
suggested conditions to the applicant.
-1- 6/8/66
H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments
Page No. 2
Minutes: 6/8/66
0
Lengthy Board discussion followed.
A -MOTION WAS MADE BY HARLOW AND SECONDED
BY MANDRELL TO ::APPROVE U 66-76 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The water, sewer and•fire hydrant system shall -be approved
by the Department of Public Works and Fire'Department.
2. Sufficient evidence shall be provided that'the 40'feet alley
located at the -southeast corner of the parcel provides access
to the -subject property from Garfield.Ave. :Said alley shall
be paved to Building Department standards --to a minimum width
of 40 feet.
3. The alley shown on the east side of the parcel shall be.private
4. Constantine Drive shall be -dedicated to City Standards.
5. Said property.shall participate.in the proposed assessment
district.
6.; Off-street,.parking facilities including landscaping,
arrangement, access, paving and striping of all parking _
spaces shall conform to Article 979.
7. The necessary provisions -for -solving the drainage•problems
in the area shall meet with the approval of the Department
of, ,Public Works .
S. A masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property
lines to City Standards. The height of said wall shall be
such that the top will be six (6) feet above the highest
- ground surface within twenty (20) feet of the common property
line.
9. Preliminary and final soil reports shall be submitted by
,an approved private -soils engineer to the City prior to
issuance of a building permit..
10.. A -plan conforming to the grading ordinance shall be sgbinitted
to the Department of Public Works for approval prior to
issuance of a building permit.
11. No structures; other -than -those shown on the approved plot
¢tan which.are indicated for immediate construction shall
be constructed within the project.
12. A plan conforming to the above conditions shall be submitted
for approval by the Board of Zoning Adjustments prior to
issuance of a--building--permit.
FOR THE • FOLLOWING 'REASONS
1. Although the assessment district has not been formed the
--applicant•has;.been required to solve the drainage problems
to the satisfaction -of the Department of Public Works.-
2. The traffic engineer-indicates-that,the proposed use will
not -present a•traffic problem.
ROLL CALL- •,VOTE: •• THERA LBEING NO FURTHER -BUSINESS TO COME
AYES: Mandrell, Day, BEFORE THE BOARD, THE MEETING ADJOURNED.:,
Harlow
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
Richard A. Harlow J hn K. Mandrell,
Secretary Chairman
-2- 6/8/66